Academic literature on the topic 'Retraduire'

Cette thèse vise à analyser quatre traductions du roman de Walter Scott Quentin Durward (1823) par le même traducteur, Auguste-Jean-Baptiste Defauconpret. Nous proposons de déterminer si ce traducteur est intervenu seul dans le processus de retraduction, si les trois versions françaises postérieures à la première traduction de 1823 sont de véritables retraductions ou de simples révisions, et si les modifications successives apportées à la première traduction vont dans le sens d’un rapprochement vers le texte source. La première partie de la thèse est dédiée, tout d’abord, aux concepts traductologiques, et plus particulièrement au phénomène de retraduction dont nous faisons l’état des lieux avant d’évoquer les théories de Brownlie et de Koskinen et Paloposki, puis d’envisager les raisons qui peuvent motiver une retraduction. Dans un second temps, nous abordons les contextes de la traduction, de l’édition et de la littérature au début du XIXe siècle. La deuxième partie de la thèse s’intéresse à Walter Scott, à Defauconpret et à l’œuvre dont les traductions sont analysées. Leur réception par la critique et par le lectorat est notamment évoquée. La dernière partie de ce travail est consacrée à l’analyse de notre corpus. Il y est en particulier question des notes de bas de page et des scotticismes, qui représentent deux éléments caractéristiques de la littérature scottienne
This dissertation aims to analyse four translations of Walter Scott’s novel Quentin Durward (1823), all translated by the same translator, Auguste-Jean-Baptiste Defauconpret. We consider determining whether the translator was the sole participant in the retranslation process, whether the three French versions that followed the first translation of 1823 are genuine retranslations or mere corrections, and whether or not the successive modifications to the first translation are oriented towards the source text. In the first part of the dissertation, some translation studies concepts are proposed, particularly the retranslation phenomenon, of which we offer an overview, before we evoke the Brownlie and the Koskinen & Paloposki theories, and the reasons why a retranslation can be envisaged. Secondly, we describe the translational, literary and publishing contexts in the beginning of the 19th century. The second part of the dissertation is dedicated to Walter Scott, Defauconpret and the novel whose translations are analysed. Their reception by the critics and the readership is discussed in particular. The analysis of the corpus follows in the last part of our work, in which we mainly study the footnotes and the scoticisms that represent characteristic features of Walter Scott literature

Meschonnic soulignait l’importance de l’« inséparabilité entre histoire et fonctionnement, entre langage et littérature », la nécessité de « reconnaître l’historicité du traduire, et des traductions » (poétique du traduire, introduction). En s’appuyant sur l’analyse des différentes traductions françaises de l’œuvre du poète-philosophe Coleridge, traductions publiées entre 1825 et 2015, nous tenterons de mettre en perspective ces traductions plurielles et les différentes théories de la traduction. Entre théorie de la traduction et pratique du traduire, comment peut-on définir le rôle et la place du traducteur ? La poésie est souvent considérée comme « intraduisible ». Pourtant, la poésie se traduit depuis des siècles. S’agit-il de traduction ou de « transposition créatrice », comme le pensait Jakobson ? Nous analyserons les différents procédés mis en œuvre pour compenser « what gets lost in translation », selon la formule de Robert Frost. En se plaçant dans une perspective comparative, nous examinerons le rôle joué par la traduction dans l’introduction de la poésie et de la pensée de Coleridge en France, ainsi que les échanges intellectuels entre France et Angleterre au moment de la naissance du Romantisme
Meschonnic emphasized the importance of the "inseparability of history and modes of operating, between language and literature", the necessity of "recognizing the historicity of translating, and of translations" (Poetics of translating, introduction). By analyzing the different French translations of the work of the poet-philosopher Coleridge, published between 1837 and 2006, I will try to put these translations in the context of the different theories of translation and the different aesthetics of reception. Between the theory of translation and the practice of translating, how can the role and position of the translator be defined? Poetry is often considered as "untranslatable". Yet poetry has been translated for centuries. Is it translation or, what Jakobson calls a process of "creative transposition"? I will analyse the different processes used to make up for "what gets lost in translation" (Robert Frost). In a comparative perspective, I will discuss the role played by translation in the reception of Coleridge's poetry and thought in France and examine the intellectual exchanges between France and Great-Britain at the time of the birth of Romanticism

Orientador: Fabio Akcelrud Durão
Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Estudos da Linguagem
Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-22T20:39:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Moira_Amara_M.pdf: 2083817 bytes, checksum: 688ce4a9ffecb500ae13e648428af24b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013
Resumo: O fato de existirem sete traduções do "Dubliners" de James Joyce poderia indicar duas situações diametralmente opostas: de um lado, que é possível já existir uma versão cujo brilho seria capaz de apagar, pelo menos temporariamente, a necessidade de se retraduzir os quinze contos; de outro, que há algo neste livro que resistiu e segue resistindo às mais obstinadas tentativas de tradução. O estudo destas traduções, entretanto, demonstrará que poucas são as divergências nas propostas que as animam, diferindo entre si tão-somente no grau de ousadia com que buscaram recriar o "Dubliners" em português: no geral, todas as sete (quatro brasileiras e três lusitanas) seriam filhas dum mesmo desejo de preservar a camada superficial de sentido a qualquer custo, mesmo que isto implique em apagar algumas das características mais intrigantes da prosa joyceana (a saber, a possibilidade de usos verbais dos personagens inadvertidamente despontarem na voz do narrador, as experiências coloquiais que abundam em qualquer dos contos [desvios da norma culta, expressões que não conhecem registro nos principais dicionários da língua, giros lexicais de sentido obscuro, peculiaridades do inglês falado na Irlanda, falas vazias de significação ou demasiado vagas, etc.] e as repetições que criam uma teia de sentidos dentro da obra). Pensando nisto e munido de um conhecimento minucioso tanto do texto inglês quanto do das versões em nosso idioma, empreendi uma nova tentativa de tradução do "Dubliners", tradução de viés acadêmico por vir acompanhada de notas e de um arcabouço teórico sólido, mas que não coloca em segundo plano a necessidade de se recriar a instigância do original irlandês. No que toca à obra joyceana, o crítico Hugh Kenner será uma das pedras de toque do projeto, enquanto que, no tocante à teoria da tradução, Walter Benjamin servirá como iluminador de caminhos. A versão castelhana de Guillermo Cabrera Infante, o genial escritor cubano e um admirador de Joyce, será um modelo de possibilidades criativas: não temos uma versão que se lhe equipare, uma versão que se proponha a criar uma obra rigorosa e de fato literária. Eis o desafio a que me proponho nesta dissertação
Abstract: The fact that there are seven translations of James Joyce's "Dubliners" could indicate two diametrically opposite situations: on the one hand, that it is possible that the splendour of one of these versions would be able to suppress, temporarily at least, the need for another translation; on the other, that there is something in this book that resisted and keeps resisting to the most obstinate attempts of translation. However, the analysis of these translations will show that there are few differences between their proposals: in general terms, all them ( four Brazilians and three Lusitanians) descended from the same desire of preserving at any cost the superficial layer of sense, even when it deletes some of his most intriguing characteristics (as some idioms of the characters appearing in the narrator's voice, or the numerous coloquial experiences, or the repetitions that create a web of signifiers inside the work). With that in mind and provided with a thorough knowledge of the English text as well as of the Portuguese translations, I undertake another attempt to translate it, an academic attempt with plenty of notes and a solid framework but bringing also to foreground the necessity of recreating a literary work, a work that deserves to be called literature. Hugh Kenner will be the touchstone regarding the Joycean criticism, while Walter Benjamin will illuminate new paths in translation studies. Guillermo Cabrera Infante, the bright Cuban writer and an admirer of Joyce, was my model of creative possibilities: we do not have a version as good as this one. This is my challenge with this dissertation
Mestrado
Teoria e Critica Literaria
Mestre em Teoria e História Literária