Relevant bibliographies by topics / Review conference in Kampala / Journal articles
To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Review conference in Kampala.

Journal articles on the topic 'Review conference in Kampala'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 11 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Review conference in Kampala.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Jia, Bing Bing. "The Crime of Aggression as Custom and the Mechanisms for Determining Acts of Aggression." American Journal of International Law 109, no. 3 (2015): 569–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.5305/amerjintelaw.109.3.0569.

Full text
Abstract:
The fallout from the 2010 Kampala Review Conference for the United States has been explained by Harold Koh and Todd Buchwald, who were officially involved in the negotiations at the conference. The concerns they enumerate serve to implicate, inter alia, two issues of broad importance for the international community: the definition of the crime of aggression, and the clear divide between the positions of the permanent members of the UN Security Council and the rest of the Kampala participants with respect to the Councils role in implementing the Rome Statute’s new provisions on the crime of aggression. This Note, which focuses on those two issues, is partly a response to some of their criticisms and partly an independent assessment of the consequences of the Review Conference. It also evaluates the Kampala amendments to the Rome Statute’in particular, Articles 8 bis, 15 bis, and 15 ter—from the perspective of customary law and considers their impact on the role assigned to the Council under the UN Charter.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

WENAWESER, CHRISTIAN. "Reaching the Kampala Compromise on Aggression: The Chair's Perspective." Leiden Journal of International Law 23, no. 4 (2010): 883–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0922156510000439.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThis contribution sets out the path towards consensus at Kampala. Before the Review Conference, two main issues remained unresolved: the question whether some form of consent by the alleged aggressor state should be required, and the role of the UN Security Council. Few had expected a consensus on a comprehensive package. The outcome of Kampala reflects significant compromises, but also a significant step to advance international criminal law.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Nsereko, Judge Daniel David Ntanda. "The Kampala Review Conference: The Capstone of the Rome System." Criminal Law Forum 22, no. 4 (2011): 511–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10609-011-9153-1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

FERENCZ, DONALD M. "The Crime of Aggression: Some Personal Reflections on Kampala." Leiden Journal of International Law 23, no. 4 (2010): 905–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0922156510000464.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThe International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg established a legal precedent for the proposition that waging a war of aggression is an international offence, for which individuals may be held criminally accountable. The efforts of the First Review Conference of the Rome Statute have resulted in a definition of the crime of aggression being included in the Rome Statute. Although a framework for the International Criminal Court's exercise of jurisdiction over the crime of aggression was also included in the amendments adopted at the Review Conference, such exercise of jurisdiction has not been given immediate effect and is subject to further action by the members of the Assembly of States Parties.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Trahan, Jennifer. "The Rome Statute's Amendment on the Crime of Aggression: Negotiations at the Kampala Review Conference." International Criminal Law Review 11, no. 1 (2011): 49–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157181211x543920.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThis past June, in Kampala, Uganda, at the first Review Conference on the International Criminal Court, States Parties forged an historic agreement, amending the Rome Statute to define the crime of aggression, and agreeing on conditions for the exercise of jurisdiction. While the definition had been essentially agreed upon during years of earlier negotiations, delegations in Kampala had to grapple with a host of complex issues related to the exercise of jurisdiction. They resolved that jurisdiction will be triggered both through Security Council referrals, as well as State Party or Prosecutor referrals, and the related "filter" mechanisms to achieve this. This result represented a significant breakthrough that was pragmatic, designed to avoided potential conflict with the U.N. Charter, and designed to protect the Court's independence. The final agreement, however, also contained compromises, excluding the acts of Non-States Parties from jurisdiction, allowing States Parties to opt out of jurisdiction, and delaying the exercise of jurisdiction until at least 2017.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Mancini, Marina. "A Brand New Definition for the Crime of Aggression: The Kampala Outcome." Nordic Journal of International Law 81, no. 2 (2012): 227–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157181012x638098.

Full text
Abstract:
At the first Review Conference of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, which was held in Kampala in 2010, the negotiations on the crime of aggression resulted in a complex package, at the core of which are the definition of the crime and the conditions for the exercise of the Court’s jurisdiction over it. This article examines the definition of the crime of aggression, as enshrined in the new Article 8 bis, considering the various parts of that package as well as the existing practice and case law. On the basis of this analysis, it evaluates the relevance of the Kampala definition to the evolution of customary international law.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Trahan, Jennifer. "From Kampala to New York—The Final Negotiations to Activate the Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court over the Crime of Aggression." International Criminal Law Review 18, no. 2 (2018): 197–243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718123-01802003.

Full text
Abstract:
The article focusses on the final negotiations this December during the Assembly of States Parties meeting, where states decided to activate the icc’s jurisdiction over the crime of aggression. The article commences with a brief background on prosecuting the crime, the negotiation of the definition and conditions for the exercise of icc jurisdiction over it, and the Kampala Review Conference adoption of the crime. It then discusses the dispute as to jurisdiction that developed post-Kampala, and how it was apparently resolved at the December meeting. The article then assesses the potential impact of activating the icc’s 4th crime in terms of deterrence, and whether the December activating resolution actually resolved the jurisdiction dispute, taking the view that it did not, and that the activating resolution was arguably an improper modification of the Kampala agreement and jurisdiction may not be as limited as what appears to have been agreed.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Nemane, Vivek V., and Indraneel D. Gunjal. "Article 124 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: ‘Transitional Provision’ or ‘The Right to (Convenient) Opt-out’." International Criminal Law Review 15, no. 5 (2015): 949–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718123-01505004.

Full text
Abstract:
Article 123 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court provides for a Review Conference to consider any amendments to the statute. Amendments proposed and forwarded by the Assembly of State Parties (asp) were considered during the first Review Conference held at Kampala in 2010. Out of the three potential amendments to the Rome Statute, a proposal to delete Article 124 of the Statute failed. This article evaluates the consistency between contents and objectives of the Rome Statute with reference to a dichotomy which has been emerged after the first Review Conference due to the retention of Article 124. The article questions the basis of the retention of Article 124, and argues that the ‘opt-out provision’ enshrined in Article 124 should be deleted from the Rome Statute during the fourteenth session of the asp in 2015.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Koh, Harold Hongju, and Todd F. Buchwald. "The Crime of Aggression: The United States Perspective." American Journal of International Law 109, no. 2 (2015): 257–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.5305/amerjintelaw.109.2.0257.

Full text
Abstract:
At the 2010 Review Conference in Kampala, the states parties to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) decided to adopt seven amendments to the Rome Statute that contemplate the possibility of the Court exercising jurisdiction over the crime of aggression subject to certain conditions. One condition was that the exercise of jurisdiction would be “subject to a decision to be taken after 1 January 2017 by the same majority of States Parties as is required for the adoption of an amendment to the Statute,” and another was that such jurisdiction could be exercised “only with respect to crimes of aggression committed one year after the ratification or acceptance of the amendments by thirty States Parties.” As these dates approach, we—two lawyers who represented the United States at the Kampala conference and who worked many hours on the United States’ reengagement with the ICC during the Obama administration—thought it an appropriate moment to take stock of where we are, how we got here, and where we might or should be headed with respect to the crime of aggression.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

BLOKKER, NIELS, and CLAUS KRESS. "A Consensus Agreement on the Crime of Aggression: Impressions from Kampala." Leiden Journal of International Law 23, no. 4 (2010): 889–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0922156510000440.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThe authors participated in the ICC Review Conference held in Kampala in June 2010, which adopted by consensus a package agreement on the crime of aggression. This contribution presents some impressions from these negotiations. It was rather unexpected that consensus agreement could be reached, and the authors offer some explanations why this was possible. They also analyse the key elements of the agreement. After the international criminalization of aggression has been debated for decades, a decisive step has now been taken towards bringing this crime within the effective jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Wong, Meagan S. "Ratifying the Amendments to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court on the Crime of Aggression." Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law Online 19, no. 1 (2016): 176–215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/18757413-00190007.

Full text
Abstract:
The Review Conference of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court in Kampala adopted amendments to the Rome Statute, providing for a definition and conditions for the jurisdiction of the crime of aggression (‘Kampala Amendments’). At present, the jurisdiction over crime of aggression has not come into effect at the International Criminal Court (ICC). For the activation of the Court’s jurisdiction over the crime of aggression, two cumulative conditions must be met: first, a minimum of 30 ratifications of the Kampala Amendments must take place; second, a majority of two thirds of States Parties have to make a decision to activate the Court’s jurisdiction after 1 January 2017. This paper analyses salient legal aspects of the activation of the Court’s jurisdiction over the crime of aggression. First, the question whether the requirements of 30 ratifications will be met will be considered. Second, the relationship of the entry into force mechanism of the amendments and the conditions for the exercise of jurisdiction will be analysed. Third, the procedure of ascertainment of the jurisdictional regime of the ICC over the crime of aggression, with particular reference to State referrals and proprio motu investigations, will be dealt with. Fourth, the need for States Parties intending to ratify the Kampala Amendments to implement the crime of aggression into their domestic legislation will be explored. Finally, the paper will explore the question whether the aggressor State (party) must ratify the Kampala Amendments in order for the jurisdictional regime over the crime of aggression to apply, or whether it suffices that the aggressed State is a ratifying State Party. A qualified solution will be suggested: while the latter reading of the law is the better one, consent of the aggressor State (party) is nevertheless upheld pursuant to the sui generis jurisdictional regime of the ICC over the crime of aggression.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Barriga, Stefan, and Leena Grover. "A Historic Breakthrough on the Crime of Aggression." American Journal of International Law 105, no. 3 (2011): 517–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.5305/amerjintelaw.105.3.0517.

Full text
Abstract:
At 12:20 in the morning on Saturday, June 12, 2010, the Review Conference of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court in Kampala, Uganda, adopted by consensus a comprehensive package of amendments on the crime of aggression. States parties to the Rome Statute thereby delivered on their promise, reflected in Article 5 (2) of the Statute, to define the crime of aggression and to agree on the conditions for the Court’s exercise of jurisdiction over that crime. Despite a thorough and more than decadelong preparatory process, few, if any, had predicted such a substantive outcome on the crime of aggression in light of the serious disagreements on major questions, which persisted until the last days of the conference. The key elements of the final package are a definition of the crime of aggression, which limits criminal responsibility to leaders who are responsible for the most serious forms of the illegal use of force between states, and a complicated set of conditions for exercising jurisdiction. Investigations would be based on either a Security Council referral or state consent.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

Hajdin, Nikola. "The Nature of Leadership in the Crime of Aggression: The ICC’s New Concern?" International Criminal Law Review 17, no. 3 (2017): 543–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718123-01703007.

Full text
Abstract:
Since the Nuremberg trials, it has been accepted that only the highest echelon of state leadership can be responsible for the crime of aggression. The crime of aggression is distinguished from other core crimes under the International Criminal Court’s (icc) purview by, inter alia, its leadership nature. According to Articles 8bis(1) and 25(3bis) of the Rome Statute, only a person ‘in a position effectively to exercise control over or direct the political or military action of a State’ can be held responsible for aggression. The ‘control or direct’ standard was adopted at the first Review Conference of the Rome Statute in Kampala in 2010 and differs from the customary counterpart (‘shape or influence’) established by the Nuremberg Military Tribunal (nmt). This article will explore how the leadership clause has evolved and whether the new standard is more appropriate for the icc.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

ZHU, Dan. "China, the Crime of Aggression, and the International Criminal Court." Asian Journal of International Law 5, no. 1 (2014): 94–122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s2044251314000046.

Full text
Abstract:
At the Kampala Review Conference in 2010, the adoption of the amendments to the Rome Statute laid the groundwork for the eventual prosecution of the crime of aggression. China, a non-State Party to the International Criminal Court, has articulated its concerns regarding the Court's jurisdiction over the crime of aggression in legal terms. This paper examines the Chinese concerns regarding the role of the Security Council in the determination of an act of aggression and the definition of aggression primarily from a legal perspective. It argues that China has hovered back and forth between two conflicting legal positions on these issues during different periods in history according to its policy preference. This paper also considers the concerns of China from a policy perspective before concluding that the crime of aggression should not be regarded as an insurmountable barrier preventing China's accession to the ICC in years to come.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Stephen, Christopher. "INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW: WIELDING THE SWORD OF UNIVERSAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE?" International and Comparative Law Quarterly 61, no. 1 (2012): 55–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0020589311000704.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractWriting 62 years ago, Georg Schwarzenberger posited that international criminal law did not exist. As long as some States, those larger or more powerful, were held to a different standard, or, in fact, not held to account at all, it was premature to speak of such a thing. For Schwarzenberger, international criminal law was a misnomer withoutuniversalcriminal justice. This article considers whether that same criticism can be made of international criminal law today. Indeed, it asks whether this is a realistic expectation in the first place. The recently concluded Review Conference of the International Criminal Court in Kampala, Uganda is seen as an ideal juncture at which to do so. This article analyses what is meant by the term international criminal law and then selects two models; the International Criminal Court and the exercise of universal jurisdiction, to gauge the success, or failure, of international criminal law in satisfying Schwarzenberger's criterion.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

Navarro, Marta Sosa. "A Hybrid Strategy to Prosecute the Waging of War." Spanish Yearbook of International Law Online 17, no. 1 (2013): 73–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22116125-01701005.

Full text
Abstract:
The Kampala Conference held in 2010 to review the Rome Statute portrays a discouraging image regarding the fight against impunity for those responsible for the waging of war. Its outcome reflects the international community’s lack of willingness to take the necessary steps to hold accountable those responsible for the crime of aggression. Regardless of the existing agreement on its definition, the International Criminal Court’s jurisdiction has been postponed again, fostering the need to resort to alternative formulas to prosecute this crime. This paper aims to study the possibility of prosecuting aggression as a crime against humanity in so far as the illegal use of force amounts to “other inhuman acts of similar character (. . .)”, articulated in article 7.1.k of the Statute. It also searches for alternative procedures to prosecute these crimes, focusing on the emerging role of domestic jurisdiction through the consolidation of the aut dedere aut judicare clause.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

Trahan, Jennifer. "Erratum to “The Rome Statute's Amendment on the Crime of Aggression: Negotiations at the Kampala Review Conference” [International Criminal Law Review 11 (2011) 49–104]." International Criminal Law Review 11, no. 4 (2011): 829. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157181211x587454.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

Stemmet, André. "All's well that ends postponed: the adoption of a definition of the crime of aggression at the Rome Statute Review Conference in Kampala." African Security Review 19, no. 4 (2010): 2–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10246029.2010.539806.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

Rapp, Kyle. "Law and contestation in international negotiations." Review of International Studies 46, no. 5 (2020): 672–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0260210520000303.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractWhat is the role of rhetoric and argumentation in international relations? Some argue that it is little more than ‘cheap talk’, while others say that it may play a role in persuasion or coordination. However, why states deploy certain arguments, and why these arguments succeed or fail, is less well understood. I argue that, in international negotiations, certain types of legal frames are particularly useful for creating winning arguments. When a state bases its arguments on constitutive legal claims, opponents are more likely to become trapped by the law: unable to develop sustainable rebuttals or advance their preferred policy. To evaluate this theory, I apply qualitative discourse analysis to the US arguments on the crime of aggression at the Kampala Review Conference of the International Criminal Court – where the US advanced numerous arguments intended to reshape the crime to align with US interests. The analysis supports the theoretical propositions – arguments framed on codified legal grounds had greater success, while arguments framed on more political grounds were less sustainable, failing to achieve the desired outcomes. These findings further develop our understanding of the use of international law in rhetoric, argumentation, and negotiation.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

Williams, Sarah. "Aggression, Affected States, and a Right to Participate: A Response to Koh and Buchwald." AJIL Unbound 109 (2015): 246–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s2398772300001537.

Full text
Abstract:
At the review conference in Kampala, States Parties adopted three new provisions on the crime of aggression for inclusion in the Rome Statute, as well as consequential amendments to the Elements of Crimes. However, states parties did not consider revisions to the procedural arrangements that may be required to accommodate the crime of aggression. The crime of aggression requires a link to states, being limited to acts of aggression by one state against another state. The individuals that can be charged with the crime of aggression are persons “in a position effectively to exercise control over or to direct the political or military action of a State.” The crime is also connected to the international security framework, in particular the UN Charter. Given that aggression is intrinsically linked to state acts, it is “likely that the ICC [International Criminal Court] would need relevant states to cooperate, present evidence, and argue the case.” Yet the existing framework does not include an adequate right of participation for affected states. This contribution suggests one possible revision to provide a clearer legal basis for states to participate directly in ICC proceedings in respect of the crime of aggression.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Wanyama, Edrine. "Demystifying the Crime of Aggression: A Case for the International Criminal Court." Christ University Law Journal 2, no. 1 (2013): 153–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.12728/culj.2.8.

Full text
Abstract:
The crime of aggression forms one of the most
 controversial parts of international law in contrast with
 the need to protect national sovereignty of a given state
 without undue interference. Even with the adoption of
 the Rome Statute in 1998, the crime of aggression seems to
 have been sidelined in favour of other matters of
 international justice concerns that did not directly touch
 the political status of the different states parties.
 Jurisdictional issues concerning aggression were left
 unresolved. The term „aggression‟ was nevertheless given
 recognition in the year 2010 at a Review Conference of the
 Rome Statute held in Kampala, Uganda, from 31 May to
 11 June 2010. However, the concept still remains on paper
 due to the postponement in establishing the jurisdiction
 of the International Criminal Court till 2017. Currently,
 only four states have signed and ratified the amendments
 to the Rome Statute 1998 and they are to be enforced over
 the next couple of years. This article gives an overview of
 the crime of aggression. It examines some of the
 contentious issues that may arise in relation to the crime
 of aggression.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

Bachmann, Sascha-Dominik, and Gerhard Kemp. "AGGRESSION AS “ORGANIZED HYPOCRISY?” – HOW THE WAR ON TERRORISM AND HYBRID THREATS CHALLENGE THE NUREMBERG LEGACY." Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice 30, no. 1 (2012): 233. http://dx.doi.org/10.22329/wyaj.v30i1.4365.

Full text
Abstract:
Modern threats to international peace and security from so called “Hybrid Threats”, multimodal threats such as cyber war, low intensity asymmetric conflict scenarios, global terrorism etc. which involve a diverse and broad community of affected stakeholders involving both regional and international organisations/structures, also pose further questions for the existing legacy of Nuremberg. The (perhaps unsettling) question arises of whether our present concept of “war and peace”, with its legal pillars of the United Nations Charter’s Articles 2(4), 51, and the notion of the criminality of waging aggressive war based on the “legacy” of Nuremberg has now become outdated to respond to new threats arising in the 21st century. This article also serves to warn that one should not use the definition of aggression, adopted at the ICC Review Conference in Kampala in 2010, to repeat the most fundamental flaw of Nuremberg: ex post facto criminalisation of the (unlawful) use of force. A proper understanding of the “legacy of Nuremberg” and a cautious reading of the text of the ICC definition of aggression provide some markers for purposes of the debate on the impact of new threats to peace and security and the use of force in international law and politics.Les menaces modernes à la paix et à la sécurité internationales, par exemple les menaces dites « hybrides », les menaces multimodales comme la cyberguerre, les conflits asymétriques de faible intensité et le terrorisme mondial, qui impliquent un groupe vaste et diversifié d’intervenants provenant de structures et d’organismes régionaux ou internationaux, remettent en cause l’héritage du procès de Nuremberg. Se pose également la question (peut-être troublante) de savoir si la notion actuelle de « guerre et paix » ancrée juridiquement dans le paragraphe 2(4) et l’article 51 de la Charte des Nations Unies et la criminalisation de la guerre d’agression fondée sur l’« héritage » du procès de Nuremberg demeure encore pertinente en ce qui concerne la réponse aux menaces du 21e siècle. Le présent article sert également à prévenir qu’il ne faut pas utiliser la définition du terme « crime d’agression » adoptée à la Conférence de révision du Statut de Rome (ayant instauré la Cour pénale internationale (CPI)), qui a eu lieu à Kampala en 2010, pour reproduire la lacune la plus fondamentale du procès de Nuremberg : la criminalisation a posteriori du recours (illégal) à la force. Une compréhension adéquate de l’héritage du procès de Nuremberg et une lecture prudente de la définition du terme « crime d’agression » de la CPI fournissent des balises au débat sur l’incidence des nouvelles menaces à la paix et à la sécurité, ainsi qu’à l’utilisation de la force en politique et en droit internationaux.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

Hilmes, Michele. "Conference Review." Critical Studies in Television: The International Journal of Television Studies 2, no. 1 (2007): 102–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.7227/cst.2.1.9.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

Dormán, György. "Conference Review." Journal of Flow Chemistry 1, no. 2 (2011): 97–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/jfchem.2011.11113.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

Bull, Gillian. "Conference review." Computer Law & Security Review 13, no. 5 (1997): 381–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0267-3649(97)80184-7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

Wiseman, David. "Conference review." Computer Law & Security Review 13, no. 3 (1997): 197–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0267-3649(97)86901-4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

Hickman, Richard. "Conference Review." Journal of Art & Design Education 15, no. 2 (1996): 215–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.1996.tb00668.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

Nelson, Robin. "Conference review." European Journal of Cultural Studies 8, no. 1 (2005): 113–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1367549405049497.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

Westbrook, Lydia J. "Conference Review." Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism 4, no. 3 (2005): 101–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/j172v04n03_07.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

Miller, Mervyn, Robert Freestone, David Gordon, Michael Hebbert, and Stephen V. Ward. "Conference Review." Journal of Planning History 10, no. 1 (2011): 87–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1538513210396346.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

Al-Sumait, Fahed. "Conference Review." Journal of Arab & Muslim Media Research 2, no. 1 (2009): 159–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1386/jammr.2.1and2.159/7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

Arya, Rina. "Conference Review." Journal of Curatorial Studies 2, no. 2 (2013): 295–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1386/jcs.2.2.295_7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

Haines, Chelsea. "Conference Review." Journal of Curatorial Studies 2, no. 3 (2013): 431–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1386/jcs.2.3.431_7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

Goodwin, Jenn. "Conference Review." Journal of Curatorial Studies 4, no. 1 (2015): 205–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1386/jcs.4.1.205_7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

Strüngmann, Agustina. "Conference Review." Journal of Curatorial Studies 4, no. 2 (2015): 353–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1386/jcs.4.2.353_7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

Spooner, Rosie. "Conference Review." Journal of Curatorial Studies 4, no. 3 (2015): 505–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1386/jcs.4.3.505_7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

Morie, Jacquelyn Ford. "Conference Review." Virtual Creativity 8, no. 1 (2018): 117–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1386/vcr.8.1.117_5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

Lohrke, B. "Conference Review." European Journal of Archaeology 4, no. 3 (2001): 423–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/146195710100400310.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

Norskov, V. "Conference Review." European Journal of Archaeology 6, no. 3 (2003): 333–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/146195710300600307.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

Goldthorpe, Charlotte. "Conference Review." Craft Research 4, no. 2 (2013): 293–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1386/crre.4.2.293_7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

Nimkulrat, Nithikul. "Conference Review." Craft Research 5, no. 1 (2014): 131–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1386/crre.5.1.131_5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

Harper, Dr Paul. "Conference Review." Craft Research 5, no. 2 (2014): 281–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1386/crre.5.2.281_5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

Perren, Nicola. "Conference Review." Craft Research 6, no. 1 (2015): 139–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1386/crre.6.1.139_5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

Goldthorpe, Charlotte. "Conference Review." Craft Research 7, no. 2 (2016): 319–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1386/crre.7.2.319_7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

Hardy, Dorothy, and Richard Arm. "Conference Review." Craft Research 8, no. 1 (2017): 141–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1386/crre.8.1.141_7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

Gardner, Laura. "Conference Review." Craft Research 8, no. 2 (2017): 317–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1386/crre.8.2.317_7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

Shercliff, Emma. "Conference Review." Craft Research 9, no. 1 (2018): 171–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1386/crre.9.1.171_7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

Borzenkova, Ganna. "Conference Review." Craft Research 9, no. 2 (2018): 339–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1386/crre.9.2.339_7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

Gardner, Heather. "CONFERENCE REVIEW." Nursing Inquiry 3, no. 1 (1996): 61–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1800.1996.tb00013.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

Taylor, Peter G. "CONFERENCE REVIEW." Nursing Inquiry 4, no. 3 (1997): 209–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1800.1997.tb00104.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography