Academic literature on the topic 'Revised Bloom's Taxonomy'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Revised Bloom's Taxonomy.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Revised Bloom's Taxonomy"
Oktaviana, Dwi, and Utin Desy Susiaty. "Development of Test Instruments Based on Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy to Measure the Students' Higher Order Thinking Skills." JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika) 9, no. 1 (September 14, 2020): 21. http://dx.doi.org/10.25273/jipm.v9i1.5638.
Full textBobunova, A., M. Sergeeva, and E. Notina. "Integrating Computer-Assisted Language Learning into ESL Classroom: Formation of Moral and Aesthetic Values." International Journal of Information and Education Technology 11, no. 1 (2021): 24–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2021.11.1.1484.
Full textLee, Yoon Suk, Tonya L. Smith-Jackson, and Maury A. Nussbaum. "Multidimensional Training System Evaluation using the Revised Bloom's Taxonomy." Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 53, no. 25 (October 2009): 1878–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154193120905302505.
Full textRadmehr, Farzad, and Michael Drake. "Revised Bloom's taxonomy and integral calculus: unpacking the knowledge dimension." International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 48, no. 8 (May 8, 2017): 1206–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2017.1321796.
Full textSweet, Charlie, Hal Blythe, and Rusty Carpenter. "Why the Revised Bloom's Taxonomy Is Essential to Creative Teaching." National Teaching & Learning Forum 26, no. 1 (December 2016): 7–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ntlf.30095.
Full textWaite, Laura H., Jason F. Zupec, Diane H. Quinn, and Cathy Y. Poon. "Revised Bloom's taxonomy as a mentoring framework for successful promotion." Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning 12, no. 11 (November 2020): 1379–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2020.06.009.
Full textNetriwati, Netriwati. "Penerapan Taksonomi Bloom Revisi untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis." Desimal: Jurnal Matematika 1, no. 3 (September 30, 2018): 347–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/djm.v1i3.3238.
Full textErnawati, Ernawati, and Baharullah Baharullah. "ANALYSIS OF HIGHER ORDER THINKING SKILLS (HOTS) IN MATHEMATICAL PROBLEM SOLVING BASED ON REVISED BLOOMS’ TAXONOMY VIEWED FROM GENDER EQUALITY." MaPan 8, no. 2 (December 15, 2020): 315–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.24252/mapan.2020v8n2a10.
Full textKOÇ, E. Seda, and Turgay Öntaş. "A comparative analysis of the 4th and 5th grade social studies curriculum according to revised bloom taxonomy." Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences 15, no. 3 (June 29, 2020): 540–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v15i3.4931.
Full textGreen, Kris H. "Matching Functions and Graphs at Multiple Levels of Bloom's Revised Taxonomy." PRIMUS 20, no. 3 (March 17, 2010): 204–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10511970802207212.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Revised Bloom's Taxonomy"
Coleman, Vada M. "National Music Education Standards and Adherence to Bloom's Revised Taxonomy." ScholarWorks, 2011. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/1048.
Full textDeForest, Reynolds Siri Torrence. "Validating Bloom's Revised Taxonomy as a Rubric for Assessing Middle School Students' Levels of Thinking." ScholarWorks, 2019. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/6990.
Full textWheeler, Donald. "Using a summative assessment alignment model and the Revised Bloom's Taxonomy to improve curriculum development, instruction, and evaluation." Related electronic resource:, 2007. http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=1342741571&sid=1&Fmt=2&clientId=3739&RQT=309&VName=PQD.
Full textDaniel, Bethany Rae. "Defining Critical Thinking for the 21st Century World Language Classroom." BYU ScholarsArchive, 2013. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/4288.
Full textSagaskie, Erin Elizabeth. "The Effect of Instruction in Alternative Solutions on American Ninth-Grade Algebra I Students' Problem Solving Performance." OpenSIUC, 2014. https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/dissertations/969.
Full textJansson, Tobias. "Vad kommer på provet? : Gymnasielärares provpraxis i samhällskunskap." Licentiate thesis, Karlstads universitet, Centrum för de samhällsvetenskapliga ämnenas didaktik, 2011. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-6716.
Full textNäsström, Gunilla. "Measurement of alignment between standards and assessment." Doctoral thesis, Umeå universitet, Beteendevetenskapliga mätningar, 2008. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-1865.
Full textBorgelind, Andreas, and Bassel Mekhelif. "Det som inte prövas är lika viktigt : En kartläggning av samstämmighet mellan Lgr 11 och de nationella proven i historia och religion för årskurs 6." Thesis, Södertörns högskola, Lärarutbildningen, 2016. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-31644.
Full textThompson, Lisa Anne. "Bloom's taxonomy goes high tech: A software review." CSUSB ScholarWorks, 2001. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project/3017.
Full textMatloob, Haghanikar Mojgan. "Exploring students’ patterns of reasoning." Diss., Kansas State University, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/2097/13646.
Full textDepartment of Physics
Dean Zollman
As part of a collaborative study of the science preparation of elementary school teachers, we investigated the quality of students’ reasoning and explored the relationship between sophistication of reasoning and the degree to which the courses were considered inquiry oriented. To probe students’ reasoning, we developed open-ended written content questions with the distinguishing feature of applying recently learned concepts in a new context. We devised a protocol for developing written content questions that provided a common structure for probing and classifying students’ sophistication level of reasoning. In designing our protocol, we considered several distinct criteria, and classified students’ responses based on their performance for each criterion. First, we classified concepts into three types: Descriptive, Hypothetical, and Theoretical and categorized the abstraction levels of the responses in terms of the types of concepts and the inter-relationship between the concepts. Second, we devised a rubric based on Bloom’s revised taxonomy with seven traits (both knowledge types and cognitive processes) and a defined set of criteria to evaluate each trait. Along with analyzing students’ reasoning, we visited universities and observed the courses in which the students were enrolled. We used the Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP) to rank the courses with respect to characteristics that are valued for the inquiry courses. We conducted logistic regression for a sample of 18 courses with about 900 students and reported the results for performing logistic regression to estimate the relationship between traits of reasoning and RTOP score. In addition, we analyzed conceptual structure of students’ responses, based on conceptual classification schemes, and clustered students’ responses into six categories. We derived regression model, to estimate the relationship between the sophistication of the categories of conceptual structure and RTOP scores. However, the outcome variable with six categories required a more complicated regression model, known as multinomial logistic regression, generalized from binary logistic regression. With the large amount of collected data, we found that the likelihood of the higher cognitive processes were in favor of classes with higher measures on inquiry. However, the usage of more abstract concepts with higher order conceptual structures was less prevalent in higher RTOP courses.
Books on the topic "Revised Bloom's Taxonomy"
Lee, Yew-Jin, Mijung Kim, and Qingna Jin. East-Asian Primary Science Curricula: An Overview Using Revised Bloom's Taxonomy. Springer, 2016.
Find full textLee, Yew-Jin, Mijung Kim, Qingna Jin, Hye-Gyoung Yoon, and Kenji Matsubara. East-Asian Primary Science Curricula: An Overview Using Revised Bloom's Taxonomy. Springer, 2016.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Revised Bloom's Taxonomy"
Lalwani, Amar, and Sweety Agrawal. "Validating Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy Using Deep Knowledge Tracing." In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 225–38. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93843-1_17.
Full textLee, Yew-Jin, Mijung Kim, Qingna Jin, Hye-Gyoung Yoon, and Kenji Matsubara. "Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy—The Swiss Army Knife in Curriculum Research." In SpringerBriefs in Education, 11–16. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2690-4_2.
Full textKrishnan, Reshmy. "Achieving Cognitive Skills in Multimedia Through Revised Bloom Taxonomy." In Creative Business and Social Innovations for a Sustainable Future, 11–20. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01662-3_2.
Full textKrouska, Akrivi, Christos Troussas, and Maria Virvou. "Computerized Adaptive Assessment Using Accumulative Learning Activities Based on Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy." In Knowledge-Based Software Engineering: 2018, 252–58. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97679-2_26.
Full textLaddha, Manjushree D., Laxman D. Netak, and Hansaraj S. Wankhede. "A Correlation Analysis Between Cognitive Process and Knowledge Dimension in Software Engineering by Using the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy." In Intelligent Human Computer Interaction, 34–41. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68449-5_4.
Full textGreiner, Christian, Florian Jovy-Klein, and Tom Peisl. "AI as Co-workers: An Explorative Research on Technology Acceptance Based on the Revised Bloom Taxonomy." In Proceedings of the Future Technologies Conference (FTC) 2020, Volume 1, 27–35. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63128-4_3.
Full textCrawford, Caroline M., and Marion S. Smith. "Rethinking Bloom's Taxonomy." In Advances in Psychology, Mental Health, and Behavioral Studies, 86–103. IGI Global, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6599-6.ch004.
Full textTao, Congwu. "A Model of Designing Online Assignments Based on the Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy." In Increasing Productivity and Efficiency in Online Teaching, 186–93. IGI Global, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0347-7.ch011.
Full textAlqurashi, Emtinan, and Ariel R. Siegelman. "Designing and Evaluating Technology-Based Formative Assessments." In Handbook of Research on Faculty Development for Digital Teaching and Learning, 222–44. IGI Global, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8476-6.ch012.
Full textHarvey, Trish, and Vivian Johnson. "The Discussion Forum." In Increasing Productivity and Efficiency in Online Teaching, 137–50. IGI Global, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0347-7.ch008.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Revised Bloom's Taxonomy"
Raykova, Mariana, Hristina Kostadinova, and George Totkov. "Adaptive test system based on revised Bloom's taxonomy." In the 12th International Conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2023607.2023692.
Full textDian Edy Prismana, Rosana, Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi, and Ikrar Pramudya. "Analyzing Students' Difficulty Based on Revised Bloom's Taxonomy." In University of Muhammadiyah Malang's 1st International Conference of Mathematics Education (INCOMED 2017). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/incomed-17.2018.45.
Full textAlaoutinen, Satu, and Kari Smolander. "Student self-assessment in a programming course using bloom's revised taxonomy." In the fifteenth annual conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1822090.1822135.
Full textMasapanta-Carrión, Susana, and J. Ángel Velázquez-Iturbide. "Evaluating Instructors' Classification of Programming Exercises Using the Revised Bloom's Taxonomy." In ITiCSE '19: Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3304221.3319748.
Full textUma, D., S. Thenmozhi, and Rabin Hansda. "Analysis on Cognitive Thinking of an Assessment System Using Revised Bloom's Taxonomy." In 2017 5th IEEE International Conference on MOOCs, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE). IEEE, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mite.2017.00033.
Full textKostadinova, Hristina, George Totkov, and Hristo Indzhov. "Adaptive e-learning system based on accumulative digital activities in revised Bloom's taxonomy." In the 13th International Conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2383276.2383330.
Full textWang, Chunying. "Marketing Curriculum Design and Application Research Based on Revised Edition of Bloom's Educational Objective Taxonomy." In Proceedings of the 2018 2nd International Conference on Economic Development and Education Management (ICEDEM 2018). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/icedem-18.2018.93.
Full textKiesler, Natalie. "Towards a Competence Model for the Novice Programmer Using Bloom's Revised Taxonomy - An Empirical Approach." In ITiCSE '20: Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3341525.3387419.
Full textRodrigues, Ariane Nunes, and Simone C. dos Santos. "A systems approach to managing learning based on Bloom's revised taxonomy to support student assessment in PBL." In 2013 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/fie.2013.6684978.
Full textJohnson, Gregory K., William D. Armitage, Alessio Gaspar, Naomi Boyer, and Cliff Bennett. "Multi-perspective survey of the relevance of the revised bloom's taxonomy to an introduction to linux course." In the 13th annual conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2380552.2380584.
Full text