Academic literature on the topic 'Rhinomodelation'

O presente artigo trata-se de uma revisão bibliográfica referente à rinomodelação e sua relação com a oclusão vascular devido ao uso de ácido hialurônico. Os procedimentos estéticos estão inseridos na sociedade desde a antiguidade, mas nos últimos anos a busca por procedimentos com acido hialurônico vem crescendo por todo o mundo. O preenchimento com AH é considerado seguro e com baixa incidência de complicações, apesar de a rinomodelação ser considerada como um dos procedimentos de mais riscos devido à vasculatura da região. Como tais eventos adversos são raros ou tem sido sub-relatados são de extrema importância o conhecimento e mais informações para identificá-los, administra-los e tratá-los da maneira correta. O foco desse artigo foi destacar a problemática da injeção intra- arterial, seus sinais e sintomas, fatores de riscos, manejo da intercorrência e possíveis tratamentos. Foi possível compreender que a maioria dos casos de oclusão vascular estão relacionados com a falta de experiência com a técnica ou pela falta de conhecimento anatômico.

The correction of imperfections in the nasal dorsum and attached structures with hyaluronic acid (HA) has become common because it is less invasive and a quick recovery procedure. Hyaluronic acid is the product of choice for rhinomodeling procedures, because it is moldable, it allows us to restructure the skin of the nose area, giving us immediate results, which can be reversed with the use of hyaluronidase. Given the above, this work aims to present a clinical case of rhinomodeling using hyaluronic acid. Female patient, sought care with a complaint regarding the tip of the nose, as she considered it “fallen”. To perform the rhinomodeling, we use hyaluronic acid at the points defined in the planning. Two orifices were used and the filled areas were the columella, base of the columella and the point of the nose. The patient was satisfied with the immediate result. It is concluded that rhinomodeling with hyaluronic acid provides immediate and satisfactory effects, being in the correction of small defects or improving the result of surgical rhinoplasties.

ABSTRACTIntroductionNonsurgical rhinoplasty or rhinomodelation is a sought‐after procedure in aesthetic practice. The current product of choice remains hyaluronic acid (HA) because of its ease of use and reversibility. However, it does carry some risks. Polycaprolactone (PCL) fillers hold a lot of promise in aesthetic practice. It has an established safety profile and a longer duration of action. Because of its unique properties, it may hold the key to the future of nonsurgical rhinomodelation.MethodsTwelve patients were enrolled in the study. Ten out of these were not willing to ask for surgery and had no breathing problems. Two were post‐surgical rhinoplasty complications who did not want another surgery. 0.2 mL of PCL filler was injected at each site according to the need (radix, spine, and or tip). The Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS; 3 = very much improved, 2 = considerably improved, 1 = improved, 0 = no change, and −1 = worse) was used along with a patient satisfaction scale (highly satisfied, satisfied, dissatisfied) were used. The sum of the GAIS ratings was quantified as total improvement (TMI). The patients were followed up for 12 months before and 12 months after procedures were taken and documented.ResultsThe GAIS score was 98% for the study and all patients were highly satisfied with their treatment right after procedure and 12 months later.ConclusionPCL fillers may be the way forward for long‐term sustained results in nonsurgical rhinomodelation. Expert injection techniques and knowing the side effects and handling them is mandatory.