To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Ricardo, David, Marx, Karl.
Journal articles on the topic 'Ricardo, David, Marx, Karl'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Ricardo, David, Marx, Karl.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
Kurz, Heinz D. "Schumpeter im sozialwissenschaftlichen Pantheon." Leviathan 47, no. 3 (2019): 375–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/0340-0425-2019-3-375.
Full textAbstract:
Der Aufsatz vergleicht die Wirtschafts- und Gesellschaftstheorie Joseph Alois Schumpeters mit den Theorien anderer großer Sozialwissenschaftler, insbesondere denjenigen von Adam Smith, David Ricardo, Karl Marx, Léon Walras und John Maynard Keynes. Das Hauptaugenmerk gilt Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschieden. Die in der Sekundärliteratur absolut und relativ wachsende Bedeutung des „Propheten der Innovation“ wird unterstrichen.
2
Previatti, Carine Botelho. "A recusa de Marx da teoria do valor - David Harvey." GEOUSP: Espaço e Tempo (Online) 22, no. 1 (2018): 257–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/issn.2179-0892.geousp.2018.145931.
Full textAbstract:
Neste artigo recente, ainda não publicado em livro, David Harvey compara a teoria do valor-trabalho de Ricardo e a teoria do valor adotada por Karl Marx, trazendo uma amostra das discussões de seu mais recente livro, Capital e a loucura da razão econômica. O autor discute as diferenças entre essas teorias e seus desdobramentos nos estudos marxistas atuais, concluindo que a forma valor dos estudos de Marx não pode ser considerada um “princípio imóvel e estável no mundo tumultuado do capital, mas uma métrica instável e em constante mudança”, que se expressa nas “novas práticas de reprodução social e massivas transformações nas vontades, necessidades e desejos de toda uma população” pela inserção na vida cotidiana. Segundo o autor, isso demonstra que essa teoria está “muito além do que Ricardo tinha em mente e é igualmente distante daquela concepção de valor geralmente atribuída a Marx”.
3
Chaikind, Stephen. "The Role of Viticulture and Enology in the Development of Economic Thought: How Wine Contributed to Modern Economic Theory." Journal of Wine Economics 7, no. 2 (2012): 213–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jwe.2012.17.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractThis paper introduces the role wine has played as a central factor in the history of economic thought. The focus is on an examination of documented sources that connect wine and its viticulture and enology with the evolution of economic concepts. Works by Adam Smith, David Ricardo, Karl Marx, John Stuart Mill, Léon Walras, Alfred Marshall, and others are examined, as well as wine economic ideas postulated by Greek and Roman thinkers. (JEL Classification: A1, B1, B3, N00)
4
Sholahuddin, M. "KRITIK TERHADAP SISTEM EKONOMISOSIALIS DAN KAPITALIS." Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan: Kajian Masalah Ekonomi dan Pembangunan 2, no. 2 (2007): 193. http://dx.doi.org/10.23917/jep.v2i2.3915.
Full textAbstract:
The failure of economic capitalism system stated by Adam Smith (1723-1790) and David Ricardo (1772-1823) actually have been criticized by Karl Marx (1818-1883) in his book "A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy" (1857) and "A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy" (1859). Karl Marx and Engels compile a new synthesis of economic socialist system. Stranger enough, socialism particularly as economic ideology is destroyed earlier than Capitalism. Meanwhile, capitalism still survives by transforming performance. For examples, at the time of the glory of Socialism age, capitalism was transformed into socialism state with social justice and welfare state concepts, and when Islam began to rise, it was transformed into new performance as if it has characteristic of Islam, but in fact it is still capitalism. This writing tries to criticize both of them by Islamic economic perspective.
5
Rodríguez Herrera, Adolfo. "Adam Smith’s concept of labour: value or measure?" Revista de Ciencias Económicas 34, no. 2 (2016): 152–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/rce.v34i2.27195.
Full textAbstract:
Smith is considered the father of the labour theory of value developed by David Ricardo and Karl Marx and simultaneously of the cost-of-production theory of value developed by John Stuart Mill and Alfred Marshall. This polysemy is partly because Smith is developping the terminology to refer to value and measure of value, and often uses it with much imprecision. That has led to different interpretations about his position on these issues, most of them derived from an error of interpretation of Ricardo and Marx.
 This paper reviews the concepts developed by Smith to formulate his theory of value (value, real price and exchangeable value). Our interpretation of his texts on value does not coincide with what has traditionally been done. According to our interpretation, it would not be correct the criticism made by Ricardo and Marx on Smith’s position about the role of labour as measure of value. For these authors, Smith is not consistent in proposing that the value of a commodity is defined or measured as the amount of labour necessary to produce it and simultaneously as the amount of labour that can be purchased by this commodity. We try to show that for Smith the labour has a double role –as source and measure of value–, and that to it is due the confusion that generates his use of some terms: Smith proposes labour as a measure of value because he conceives it as a source of value. With this interpretation it becomes clear, paradoxically, that Smith holds a labour theory of value that substantially corresponds to the one later developed by Ricardo and Marx.
6
Couto, Joaquim Miguel, Maria de Fátima Garcia, Carlos Eduardo de Freitas, and Rodolfo Cezar Silvestre. "Desemprego tecnológico: Ricardo, Marx e o caso da indústria de transformação Brasileira (1990-2007)." Economia e Sociedade 20, no. 2 (2011): 299–327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0104-06182011000200004.
Full textAbstract:
A questão do desemprego tecnológico preocupou a mente de dois dos maiores pensadores da ciência econômica: David Ricardo e Karl Marx. Ambos acreditaram que a introdução de novas máquinas poderia causar uma situação de desemprego crônico durante certo período de tempo. No entanto, esta era apenas uma possibilidade, que já havia ocorrido no capitalismo industrial inglês, mas que poderia ser evitada caso novos investimentos absorvessem a mão de obra dispensada pela introdução de nova maquinaria. O Brasil, por sua vez, passou, ao longo da década de 1990, por um período de reestruturação de seu parque industrial que, mediante a metodologia utilizada em nosso estudo, resultou na conclusão da existência do fenômeno do desemprego tecnológico durante boa parte da referida década.
7
Couto, Joaquim Miguel, Carlos Eduardo de Freitas, and Ana Cristina Lima Couto. "A visão clássica da ameaça do desemprego tecnológico." A Economia em Revista - AERE 17, no. 1 (2011): 5. http://dx.doi.org/10.4025/aere.v17i1.13066.
Full textAbstract:
A questão do desemprego tecnológico preocupou a mente de dois dos maiores pensadores da ciência econômica: David Ricardo e Karl Marx. Ambos acreditaram que a introdução de novas máquinas poderia causar uma situação de desemprego crônico durante certo período de tempo, prejudicial a classe trabalhadora. O movimento luddita do início do século XIX deixou claro que o desemprego tecnológico era um fenômeno real. No entanto, os autores reconheceram que o desemprego tecnológico poderia ser evitado caso novos investimentos absorvessem a mão-de-obra dispensada pela introdução de nova maquinaria. Ou seja, tudo dependeria da velocidade do desenvolvimento da tecnologia e do crescimento da economia, aliada ainda ao crescimento da população e da redução da jornada de trabalho.
8
Da Silva, Edmilson Gomes. "O CONCEITO DE TRABALHO ALIENADO EM KARL MARX NA SOCIEDADE CAPITALISTA: DISCUSSÕES FILOSÓFICAS NA MODERNIDADE NOS MANUSCRITOS ECONÔMICOS - FILOSÓFICOS." Cadernos Cajuína 3, no. 1 (2018): 35. http://dx.doi.org/10.52641/cadcaj.v3i1.197.
Full textAbstract:
<p>O objetivo desta pesquisa é analisar o conceito de trabalho alienado no pensamento de Karl Marx na sociedade moderna capitalista aos conhecimentos filosóficos nos manuscritos econômicos – filosóficos,1844. Desse modo, o trabalho alienado é fundamental para um debate e discussões filosóficas na teoria marxista e o liberalismo econômico na modernidade. Na discussão teórica - filosófica, Marx discute o conceito de trabalho alienado a partir de uma crítica aos fundamentos econômicos e políticos na sociedade do mercado/capitalista. Contudo, a literatura teórica é apresentada nos manuscritos econômicos – filosóficos. Nesta obra, Marx faz crítica aos filósofos fisiocratas de Adam Smith e David Ricardo. Estes consideram o trabalho como de fonte de riqueza do trabalhador. Assim, trabalho e alienação vão na lógica sob o processo da mais valia dos sujeitos como a exploração da força do trabalhador para manter a relação econômica para o sistema de produção capitalista. Dessa forma, A metodologia utilizada foi uma pesquisa bibliográfica no pensamento marxista sobre e o conceito de trabalho alienado na sociedade capitalista.</p><p> </p>
9
Howard, M. C., and J. E. King. "Marx, Jones, Rodbertus and the Theory of Absolute Rent." Journal of the History of Economic Thought 14, no. 1 (1992): 70–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1053837200004405.
Full textAbstract:
As is well-known, Karl Marx distinguished three types of rent. In addition to two categories of differential rent, closely related to the Ricardian extensive and intensive margins, he argued (against David Ricardo) that rent was paid on the least fertile land. For Marx this so-called “absolute rent” resulted from the barrier posed by landed property to the free movement of capital into agricultural production. Since the organic composition of capital was relatively low in agriculture, the prices of production of farm products were lower than their labor values. The existence of private property in land prevented the reduction of agricultural prices to these prices of production, and allowed the payment of rent even on what could be described, in Ricardian terms, as marginal land. There exists a sizeable literature on Marx's theory of absolute rent,1 but there is no systematic account of its gestation and development. In this paper we explain how Marx's critique of Ricardian rent theory evolved between his first doubts early in 1851 and the articulation of a distinctive alternative analysis in the manuscripts of 1862–63. We also assess the influence exerted on Marx by Richard Jones and Johann Karl Rodbertus, and briefly discuss the significance of Marx's theory of absolute rent for his political economy as a whole.
10
Kurz, Heinz D. "Technical progress, capital accumulation and income distribution in Classical economics: Adam Smith, David Ricardo and Karl Marx." European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 17, no. 5 (2010): 1183–222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2010.522242.
Full text
11
Couto, Joaquim Miguel, José Adalberto Morão Dantas, and Carlos Eduardo Freitas. "A CRISE FINANCEIRA INTERNACIONAL E O MERCADO DE TRABALHO NOS ESTADOS UNIDOS: LIÇÕES PARA O BRASIL." A Economia em Revista - AERE 21, no. 2 (2016): 61. http://dx.doi.org/10.4025/aere.v21i2.23178.
Full textAbstract:
A crise financeira internacional de 2008/2009 revelou aos Estados Unidos que sua economia é atualmente incapaz de gerar empregos de qualidade suficientes para sua população economicamente ativa. As teorias de David Ricardo, Karl Marx e J. M. Keynes ajudam a entender o que se passa na principal economia do planeta. Este trabalho aponta que a causa do alto desemprego, além do baixo crescimento da economia e do avanço tecnológico, é o processo de desindustrialização que o país enfrenta desde os anos 1980. A lição para o Brasil, neste momento de perda de competitividade da indústria nacional em relação aos produtos importados, causada principalmente pela valorização cambial, é que a indústria brasileira deve ser protegida da concorrência desleal de outros países, e com isso evitar ou retroceder o processo de desindustrialização.
12
Amitrano, Claudio, and Lucas Vasconcelos. "Income distribution, inflation and economic growth: A post-Keynesian approach." Panoeconomicus 66, no. 3 (2019): 277–306. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/pan1903277a.
Full textAbstract:
The dispute between social classes for fractions of income was a central theme for economic analysis at least since David Ricardo and Karl Marx. Its importance as an interpretative key declined with the marginalist revolution of the late nineteenth century and did not regain its central role in the conventional economic approach ever since. However, its relevance was maintained among heterodox economists such as Michal Kalecki and reinvigorated by post-Keynesian thinking. This paper seeks to offer three analytical contributions to the post- Keynesian literature: (1) it presents an integrated framework on the relationship between distributive conflict, inflation and economic growth in an open economy with government; (2) it proposes the use of a general framework, based on liquid preference, assets own interest rates, currency hierarchy and productivity differentials to understand the determinants of the spot exchange rate; and (3) it suggests a distinct monetary rule to take into account the role of interest rates on distributive conflict inflation and demand and growth regimes.
13
Vernengo, Matías. "Classical Political Economy and the Evolution of Central Banks: Endogenous Money and the Fiscal-Military State." Review of Radical Political Economics 50, no. 4 (2018): 660–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0486613418773754.
Full textAbstract:
The paper analyzes briefly the changing ideas on the role of money and banks from William Petty to Thomas Tooke, including the works of Adam Smith, David Ricardo, and Karl Marx. It analyzes the role of ideas in shaping the evolution of central bank regulation. Particular importance is given to the Bank of England’s inconvertibility period, from 1797 to 1821, and the ensuing debate in shaping Robert Peel’s Bank Act of 1844, which is often seen as the birth of modern central banking. The importance of the Say’s Law, and the inexistence of an alternative theory of the determination of output, is shown to play an essential role in the policy prescriptions of the so-called Bullionist authors, who won the debates that shaped central banking practices in the nineteenth century. The paper concludes with a brief analysis of what is a central bank according to the dominant (marginalist) mainstream of the profession, and what an alternative conception based on what may be termed classical-Keynesian political economy would be. JEL Classification: B10, N20, E58
14
Newman, Joshua I., and Kyle S. Bunds. "Special Issue Foreword: On the Political Economy of Amateur Athletics." Journal of Amateur Sport 2, no. 1 (2016): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/jas.v2i1.5696.
Full textAbstract:
In its most artless definition, political economy refers to the study of inter- and intrastate transaction—concerned in large part with the dialectics of state governance and the production/consumption functions therein. Many of us, with varying degrees of deliberation, have read the works of forerunning political economists such as Adam Smith (c. 1723-1790), David Ricardo (c. 1772-1823), Thomas Malthus (c. 1766-1834), John Stuart Mill (c. 1806-1873), Karl Marx (c. 1818-1883), and Thorstein Veblen (c. 1857-1929). These classic political economists and their contemporaries shared a concern for the extent to which land, labor, income, capital, and the population derived value from, and maintained contingency with, state polity. While each diverged from the others in how to best organize the State in relation to markets and exchange activities (and vice versa) so as to optimize the citizenry’s well-being, these scholars and their contemporaries laid the foundations for the long-standing field of inquiry fixed on exploring how various national political systems (democracy, monarchy, aristocracy, oligarchy, etc.), markets, and political and economic behavior could bring about national prosperity, maximize individual freedom, or raise collective utility.
15
Penagos Rozo, Marco Leonardo. "Incidencia del sector financiero en el conflicto económico: la formación bruta de capital en Colombia y el prime rate." Equidad y Desarrollo, no. 12 (July 10, 2009): 87–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.19052/ed.218.
Full textAbstract:
El documento discute la incidencia reciente que tiene la tasa de interés norteamericana (Prime Rate) en la formación bruta de capital en Colombia. Se desarrolla con base en el modelo Solow-Swan ampliado que fuera presentado inicialmente por Mankiw, Romer y Weil en 1992, y seguido en el mismo año de una versión de Mankiw, Romer y Sala-i-Martin en la cual incorporan las economías abiertas. El soporte teórico está sustentado en Adam Smith, quien da importancia a la seguridad en las naciones que usan el capital; David Ricardo, quien presenta las maneras de la acumulación del capital; Karl Marx, quien interpreta el estímulo a la inversión a partir de la tasa de ganancia y de la tasa de interés; Joseph A. Schumpeter, quien ve en el capital un activo inmediato convertible en dinero; y los keynesianos como Harrod, quienes no consideran la intensidad en la utilización de capital como respuesta al descenso en la tasa de interés, en tanto Keynes sí la considera. El ejercicio conduce al cálculo en el que se define el coeficiente de participación del capital y su depreciación, con el fin de mostrar la relación entre la formación bruta de capital en Colombia y el Prime Rate, y su impacto en la economía.
16
Boros, József. "A technológiai fejlődés lehetséges munkahelyteremtő-, és romboló hatásai." International Journal of Engineering and Management Sciences 5, no. 1 (2020): 53–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.21791/ijems.2020.1.5.
Full textAbstract:
A történelem során a technológiai változások gyakran a munkavállalói szorongások alapját szolgálták. 1811 és 1816 között Angliában a munkavállalók egy csoportja – akik „Luddistáknak” nevezték magukat – tönkretették azokat a gépeket, amelyekről azt gondolták, hogy veszélyeztetik a munkahelyüket. A 19. századi gondolkodók és közgazdászok, mint Karl Marx és David Ricardo azt jósolták, hogy a gazdaság gépesítése végső soron a munkavállalói körülményeket rontaná, megfosztva őket attól, hogy egy elfogadható szintű bérből élhessenek. Az elmúlt évszázadban John M. Keynes (az 1930-as években) és Wassily Leontief (az 1950-es években) azon félelmüket fogalmazták meg, hogy egyre több és több munkást váltanak ki gépi megoldásokkal, amely munkanélküliséghez vezet. Az utóbbi években Brynjolfsson és McAfee (2014) állította, hogy a jelenlévő technológiák csökkentik a munkaerő iránti keresletet és az emberi munkaerő egy részét tartós hátrányba sodorják. Azonban számos kompenzációs mechanizmus létezik, amelyek ellensúlyozhatják az automatizálás és általában a folyamatinnováció kezdeti munkaerő-kiszorító hatásait (Vivarelli, 2015). Először is, miközben a munkavállalókat kiváltják azokban az iparágakban, amelyekben bevezetik az új gépekbe épített technológiát, további munkavállalókra van szükség az új gépeket gyártó iparágakban. Másodszor, az automatizálás (és általánosságban a folyamatinnováció) csökkenti az átlagos költségeket. Acemoglu és Restrepo (2017) azt állapították meg, hogy ez egyrészről ár-termelékenységi („priceproductivity”) hatást eredményez (mivel a termelési költségek csökkennek, az iparág kibővítheti és növelheti munkaerő-igényét); és másrészről a termelés méretgazdaságossági hatásához vezet (az automatizálás miatti költségcsökkenés a teljes kibocsátás növekedéséhez vezet, és minden iparágban növeli a munkaerő iránti igényt). Hasonlóképpen, Vivarelli (2015) azzal érvel, hogy az alacsonyabb átlagköltségek alacsonyabb árakat eredményezhetnek (ha az ipar piaci struktúrája tökéletesen versenyképes), stimulálják a termékkeresletet, vagy extra nyereséget eredményezhetnek (ha az ipar szerkezete nem tökéletesen versenyképes). Ha ezeket az extra nyereségeket újra befektetik a cégbe, ez a beruházás új munkahelyeket teremthet. Az előadás ezen ellensúlyozó eseteket szándékozik bemutatni és valós példákkal alátámasztani a szakirodalom alapján.
17
Bhandari, Lila Raj. "The Role of Tourism for Employment Generation in Nepal." Nepal Journal of Multidisciplinary Research 2, no. 4 (2019): 17–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/njmr.v2i4.28704.
Full textAbstract:
This study explores the contribution of tourism for employment generation that is also a major part of individual as well as national income. This is a strong pillar of the national income that may promote and upgrade the economic level of the citizens through service sectors. On the basis of secondary sources, this study has been analyzed the trend of employment generation due to tourism industry in government and private levels. Tourism industry helps not only for government level employment like: in Ministry of Tourism (MOT), Nepal Tourism Board (NTB) and Tourism Information Center (TIC) but it supports to the private sectors such as : Star Hotels, Tourist Standard Hotels (TSH), Home Stay (private and community),Tracking Agency, Travel Agency, Rafting Agency, International Airlines, Domestic Airlines, Paragliding, Tourist Transportation, and others( Porter, Guide, cook, Ultra-light) also. Descriptive research design, quantitative research method and average sampling have been applied in this research for proper analysis because of its nature. Secondary data of a decade have been selected and analyzed during this research. Under the guidance of economic growth model, development theory associates with Adam Smith, David Ricardo, Malthus, Karl Marx, and Rostow, has been applied. This study has moreover shown that the trend of employment in tourism sector has been increasing drastically during a decade which has been supported by table no 1, 2 and 3. Analyzing secondary data which was collected during the period of 2008/09 to 2017/18, this study has concluded that inadequate infrastructure, inadequate promoting activities and regularity mechanism, political unrest, lack of skilled human resources and unhealthy competition among tourism establishments were some major barriers faced by the tourism sector for employment generation. This study suggested that the government should develop tourism infrastructure including road, electricity and communication, and tourism promoting activities in government and non-government organizations. There is also an urgent need to invest more on improving hospitality skill of employees for quality tourism in Nepal.
18
Ray, Larry, and Iain Wilkinson. "Interview with David McLellan July 2018." Journal of Classical Sociology 19, no. 1 (2019): 87–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1468795x18810580.
Full textAbstract:
David McLellan, interviewed here, is a Fellow of Goldsmiths College, University of London and Emeritus Professor of Political Theory, University of Kent. Since the 1970s he has been one of the leading biographers, translators and commentators on Marx in the English-speaking world. He is the author of several books on Marx and Marxism, including The Young Hegelians and Karl Marx; Karl Marx: His Life and Thought; Karl Marx: Selected Writings; Marx before Marxism; and Marxism and Religion. He has also published a biography of Simone Weil, books on the political implications of Christianity, and a lengthy article on contract law and marriage. He lectures widely around the world on these topics, frequently in China, and in 2018 addressed a conference in Nairobi on religion and world peace. In this interview, or conversation, with Larry Ray and Iain Wilkinson, in July 2018, David discusses the origins of his interest in Marx, the development Marx’s thought and his critique of the Hegelians, Marx’s critical method, Marx and religion, Marx on Russia, the role of violence in social change, the relevance of Marx’s work today, and offers comments on some recent biographies. David has spent much of his intellectual career engaging with the meaning and legacy of Marxism and these reflections should generate reflection and debate on the significance of Marx and the possibilities of radical political change today.
19
Wellen, Henrique. "KARL MARX COMO PATRIMÔNIO DA HUMANIDADE: ENTREVISTA COM DAVID MCLELLAN." Revista Novos Rumos 58, no. 1 (2021): 21–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.36311/0102-5864.2021.v58n1.p21-33.
Full textAbstract:
Entrevista com o Cientista Poítico David McLellan, Professor Emérito da University of Kent (Inglaterra). McLellan é considerado um dos principais biógrafos, comentadores e tradutores de Marx e de sua obra no mundo anglófono. É autor de vários livros sobre Marx e o marxismo, entre eles destancam-se The Young Hegelians and Karl Marx (1969); Marx antes do marxismo (1970); Karl Marx: vida e pensamento (1973) e Marxism and e Religion (1987).
20
Rojas, Raul. "Die literarische Produktion von Marx im Zeitraum 1840 bis 1883." PROKLA. Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialwissenschaft 18, no. 72 (1988): 117–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.32387/prokla.v18i72.1288.
Full textAbstract:
Über wenige Autoren der Sozialwissenschaften gibt es derart gründliche und nahezu lückenlose Untersuchungen wie über Karl Marx. Während wir im Falle von Ökonomen wie Ricardo nur über Quellen verfügen, die einen relativ späteren Abschnitt ihres Lebens abdecken und wir von Sozialphilosophen wie Adam Smith nur das kennen, was Smith vor seinem Tod nicht verbrennen ließ, verhält es sich bei Marx völlig anders. Bereits in der MEW-Ausgabe finden sich Schriften und Briefe, die auf das Jahr 1837 zurückgehen und den Zeitraum bis zum Tode von Marx umfassen. In der neuen MEGA-Ausgabe wurde die Sammlung der Marxschen Schriften weiter vervollständigt...
21
Neves, Francisco Ramos. "Karl Marx: vida e obra em uma introdução histórico-crítica." Trilhas Filosóficas 11, no. 3 (2019): 21–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.25244/tf.v11i3.3542.
Full textAbstract:
Resumo: O artigo aborda de forma introdutória aspectos da vida e obra de Karl Marx. Apresenta uma investigação histórico-crítica do percurso intelectual e político de formação do pensamento marxiano, a partir da exposição de suas obras. Demonstramos os fundamentos filosóficos e políticos em sua obra e levantamos alguns elementos críticos para o debate contemporâneo. Palavras-chave: Karl Marx. Pensamento marxiano. Vida. Obra. Abstract: The article discusses introductory form aspects of the life and work of Karl Marx. Features a historical-critical investigation of the intellectual and political journey of formation of Marian thought, from the exhibition of his works. We demonstrate the philosophical foundations and politicians in your work and we raised some critical elements for the contemporary debate. Keywords: Karl Marx. Marxian thought. Life. Work. REFERÊNCIAS ALTHUSSER, Louis. A Favor de Marx – (Pour Marx). 2. Ed. Rio: Zahar, 1977. CHASIN, J. (Org.). Marx Hoje. São Paulo: Ensaio, 1987. (Cadernos Ensaio 1) ALTHUSSER, Louis. Marx – Da razão do mundo ao mundo sem razão. In: CHASIN, J. (Org.). Marx Hoje. São Paulo: Ensaio, 1987. (Cadernos Ensaio 1) ENGELS, F. Karl Marx. In: CHASIN, J. (Org.). Marx Hoje. São Paulo: Ensaio, 1987. (Cadernos Ensaio 1) ENGELS, F. Prefácio à edição alemã de 1883 do Manifesto Comunista. In: MARX, K.; ENGELS, F. Obras Escolhidas. v.1. São Paulo: Alfa-Ômega, 1980. ENGELS, Friedrich. Prefácio à edição inglesa de 1888 do Manifesto do Partido Comunista. In: MARX, Karl; ENGELS, Friedrich. Manifesto do Partido Comunista. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1988. GIANNOTTI, José Arthur. Marx: Vida e Obra. In: Karl Marx. 2.ed. São Paulo, Abril Cultural, 1978. (Col. Os Pensadores) LENIN, Vladimir Ilich Ulianov. As três fontes e as três partes constitutivas do Marxismo. 5.ed. São Paulo: Global, 1985. (Col. Bases 8). LÖWITH, Karl. El Sentido de la História. Madrid: Aguilar, 1956. MARX, Karl. A guerra civil na França. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2011. MARX, Karl; ENGELS, Friedrich. Ideologia Alemã. São Paulo: Moraes, 1984. MARX, Karl; ENGELS, Friedrich. Manifesto do Partido Comunista. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1988. MARX, Karl. Manuscritos econômicos filosóficos. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2008. McLELLAN, David. Karl Marx: Vida e Pensamento. Petrópolis-RJ: Vozes, 1990. TRAGTENBERG, Maurício. Marx/Bakunin. In: CHASIN, J. (Org.). Marx Hoje. São Paulo: Ensaio, 1987. (Cadernos Ensaio 1) VAZ, Henrique Lima. Sobre as fontes filosóficas do pensamento de Karl Marx. In: CHASIN, J. (Org.). Marx Hoje. São Paulo: Ensaio, 1987. (Cadernos Ensaio 1)
22
CERQUEIRA, HUGO E. A. DA GAMA. "Breve história da edição crítica das obras de Karl Marx." Revista de Economia Política 35, no. 4 (2015): 825–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0101-31572015v35n04a08.
Full textAbstract:
RESUMOEste artigo discute as tentativas de publicar uma edição histórico-crítica das obras de Karl Marx, o Marx-Engels Gesamtausgabe (MEGA): a primeira, que foi liderada por David Riazanov na décadas de 1920 e 1930, e o segundo, a MEGA2, projeto que começou na década de 1970 e ainda está em curso de publicação. O artigo apresenta essas duas edições e discute o seu impacto sobre a interpretação do pensamento econômico e filosófico de Marx.
23
Temkin, Gabriel. "Karl Marx and the Economics of Communism: Anniversary Recollections." Communist and Post-Communist Studies 31, no. 4 (1998): 303–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0967-067x(98)00014-2.
Full textAbstract:
This paper grew out of the author's Karl Marx studies and his practical knowledge of Soviet-type communist economies. It covers a broad spectrum of ideas and practices prevalent in those economies, which— rightly or wrongly—have become associated with Marx's teaching and predictions. Chapter I tries to explain the reasons for Marx's continuous popularity. Chapter II critically examines the validity of the claim about Marxian socialism being “scientific” as opposed to “utopian”. The article, especially in chapter III elaborates on a number of other Marxian ideas, like that of the so-called “anarchy of the market”, which for many decades exerted a negative influence on his followers—theoreticians and practitioners engaged in building what they believed to be a communist economy and society. One of the quintessential features of Marx's teaching, which he took over from Smith and Ricardo, was the labor theory of value and the “law of value” in particular. The latter, interpreted by Stalin as “the law of value under socialism”, was used by him for ideological and propaganda purposes, but after his death has in turn been utilized by Marxists, non-Marxists and anti-Marxists to discredit the Stalinist economic system, and to advance propositions ranking from profound, relevant and commendable to vague and frivolous. Tracing in Chapter IV the peripetia of this “law” provides a deeper insight into both the essential weaknesses of the Marxian theory and the acute dilemmas of the Soviet-type economies.
24
Wainwright, Joel. "What if Marx was an anarchist?" Dialogues in Human Geography 7, no. 3 (2017): 257–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2043820617732915.
Full textAbstract:
This essay responds to David Harvey (2017, ‘Listen, Anarchist!’ a personal response to Simon Springer’s ‘Why a radical geography must be anarchist’. Dialogues in Human Geography) by proposing that Karl Marx could be considered an anarchist. To make this argument, I draw on Kojin Karatani’s Transcritique: On Kant and Marx (2005, Cambridge: MIT Press).
25
Kluge, Alexander, and Oskar Negt. "Elements of a Political Economy of Labor Power." October 149 (July 2014): 9–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/octo_a_00182.
Full textAbstract:
The subtitle of Karl Marx's central work, Capital, reads: “Critique Of Political Economy.” Based on the observations of the Anglo-Saxon economists Adam Smith and David Ricardo, this work poses the following of many possible questions: If capital could speak, how would it explain itself? Can capital say “I”?
26
Machado, Rita de Cassia Fraga, and Luiz Fernando de Souza Santos. "Amazônia e Marx na periferia latino-americana." Germinal: Marxismo e Educação em Debate 13, no. 2 (2021): 367–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.9771/gmed.v13i2.45049.
Full textAbstract:
O presente trabalho tem por objetivo explorar a hipótese de um encontro entre Karl Marx e o mundo tropical que chamaremos de Amazônia. Exploraremos uma hipótese de David Harvey, que indica a presença de uma espacialidade, uma territorialidade na mobilização de categorias de valor-de-uso e valor-de-troca para indicar a exigência da Amazônia, considerando a América Latina.
27
Riva, Tommaso Redolfi. "Samuel Bailey and David Ricardo in Karl Marx’s Dialectic of the Form of Value." Dialogue and Universalism 28, no. 3 (2018): 55–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/du201828337.
Full text
28
Fontes, Virgínia. "David Harvey: Dispossession or Expropriation? Does capital have an “outside”?" Revista Direito e Práxis 8, no. 3 (2017): 2199–211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2179-8966/2017/30245.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract The present excerpt is taken from a book that stands for the concept of capital-imperialism in order to explain the contemporary period (which integrates theory of value and the state). It proposes a debate, with David Harvey, on the concept of accumulation by dispossession, arguing that expropriation forms are not limited to a "primitive" moment but they are part of an enlarged form of expansion of capital and capitalism itself. It presents a comparative investigation between the formulations present in the works of Karl Marx, Karl Kautsky and Rosa Luxemburg, to critically reflect on the concepts of "external/internal", as well as expropriation and capitalist accumulation in the contemporary context.
29
Herrera Zgaib, Miguel Ángel. "Coyuntura global, crisis de la deuda y cuarto de hora de América Latina." Criterios 4, no. 2 (2011): 183–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.21500/20115733.1956.
Full textAbstract:
La economía desde un comienzo fue entendida, primero como reflexión acerca de la organización y reproducción privada de la existencia, después con la creación del saber moderno de la economía política, ésta ubica las reglas del “buen vivir” colectivo en el espacio privado estatal.
 La posterior crítica de la disciplina en cabeza de Carlos Marx, expuesta en su monumental obra, El Capital, ajustó cuentas con los aportes de Adam Ferguson, Adam Smith y David Ricardo (Ricardo, D. 1943). Él mostró la condición antagónica, polar entre capital y trabajo, y su necesaria contradictoria coexistencia, alimentada de sangre, sudor y lágrimas.
 El siglo XX evidencia una transformación circuntancial en la política y la economía además de surelación con el crecimiento el Estado mismo, su tranformación y consolidación como Estado Máximo o Estado Minimo. El modelo económico jugo un papel importante ya que este determinaba la reducción del Estado a las márgenes del mercado. Para restablecer el reinado de los sponte acta, el espacio extraestatal de los individuos egoístas de la sociedad de ayer y hoy (Sartori: 1984, 219).
30
Musse, Ricardo. "DAVID HARVEY: PARA ALÉM DE UMA GEOGRAFIA DO CAPITAL." Sociologia & Antropologia 4, no. 1 (2014): 55–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2238-38752014v413.
Full textAbstract:
Resumo Em Os limites do capital, David Harvey atualiza e interpreta a obra de Karl Marx por meio de uma espécie de reconstituição da "crítica da economia política". Suas intervenções em diversos debates políticos e teóricos posteriores foram muitas vezes municiadas por esse trabalho. Sua participação na querela sobre o pós-modernismo, dialogando com Jürgen Habermas e Fredric Jameson, rendeu-lhe um reconhecimento público que não cessou de crescer desde então. Pouco mais de uma década após a publicação de Condição pós-moderna, Harvey reformulou seu diagnóstico do presente histórico. Em O novo imperialismo debruça-se sobre a nova ordem engendrada pela reação do Estado norte-americano aos atentados de 11 de setembro de 2001. Para qualificar o debate, procurou reestabelecer as determinações conceituais e históricas da teoria marxista do imperialismo.
31
Westra, Richard. "Local Trade and Exchange/Employment Systems (LETS) in Future Eco-sustainable Societies." Anthropology in Action 23, no. 2 (2016): 35–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.3167/aia.2016.230206.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractAll communities of practice must face questions relating to the material economic foundations of future sustainable societies. David Graeber, Karl Polanyi and Karl Marx each have produced typologies of possible types of economy, synthesised as: (1) the principle of individual reciprocity, (2) the market principle of capitalism, and (3) the planning principle of the state. I apply this synthesis to recent proposals for community change advanced by Bill McKibben and David Korten concerning economic scale and the re-localising of production and consumption sundered by globalisation, focused on the local exchange and trading system (LETS). The operationalising of LETS draws upon Adam Smith’s view of markets as face-to-face exchanges of goods taking place in small morality-bound communities. Smith, McKibben and Korten conflate two different meanings of the term ‘exchange’. To understand the role LETS may play in future sustainable economies in communities of practice demands treatment of this problem.
32
Bojorge Murillo, Alexander. "PROCESO DE EMPOBRECIMIENTO EN AMÉRICA CENTRAL, UN ACERCAMIENTO MARXISTA. CASO DE GUATEMALA DURANTE LA DICTADURA DE EFRAÍN RÍOS MONTT." Trama. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades. 6, no. 1 (2017): 35. http://dx.doi.org/10.18845/tramarcsh.v6i1.3167.
Full textAbstract:
<p>Para la sociología del trabajo1 en particular, y para la sociología en general, tanto la pauperización del trabajo, la acumulación por desposesión (Harvey, 2005), como la flexibilización laboral representan una parte dentro de la problemática planteada por el filósofo alemán Karl Marx, nacido en 1883, autor del texto El Capital. En el primer capítulo encontramos una crítica del sistema tradicional político y económico. Sin embargo, a lo largo de este estudio analizaremos los límites2 de la teoría marxista, para introducirnos en el proceso de empobrecimiento guatemalteco, para luego retomar la teoría de Karl Marx en lo referente a los procesos de acumulación originaria y la pauperización de las condiciones de trabajo campesino y las condiciones de vida. Esos procesos constituyen una extracción de su fuerza laboral y especialmente de las técnicas agrícolas, las cuales, muchas veces son producto de la herencia, ya que los conocimientos son parte de una cadena de sucesiones ancestrales. Este análisis observa las formas y motivos que llevaron al genocidio de la población Ixil, para luego relacionar aportes específicos de Marx con algunos marxistas e historiadores como David Harvey y Nico Poulantzas.</p><p>El principal hallazgo de la presente investigación bibliográfica señala con fuentes documentales a actores y la responsabilidad del genocidio como principal elemento generador de pobreza en Guatemala.</p>
33
Hernández Márquez, Victor M. "Marx y las ciencias sociales: La interpretación de Veblen sobre Das Kapital." Protrepsis, no. 15 (November 11, 2018): 61–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.32870/prot.i15.197.
Full textAbstract:
El presente trabajo se propone exponer y discutir la recepción temprana de Das Kapital en el campo de las ciencias sociales, enfocándose en el análisis que Thorstein Veblen hizo a principios del siglo XX. Con una formación sólida como filósofo y como economista, Veblen era la persona mejor preparada para mostrar las virtudes y defectos de la teoría de Marx. Según su análisis, el cual denomino interpretación holista, la originalidad de Marx recae en la forma como amalgama elementos pertenecientes a dos tradiciones de pensamiento completamente ajenas entre sí; es decir, el idealismo alemán, y en particular, al teoría de Hegel, con la economía política inglesa de Adam Smith, Jeremy Bentham y David Ricardo. Por consiguiente, dado que la fuerza de la teoría del capital no recaen en los elementos considerados de manera aislada, sino en la forma en que han sido incorporado en una estructura lógica fuerte, sostiene Veblen, no tiene sentido discutir la teoría de Marx analizando cada uno de sus elementos por separado; proceder de esta forma solo puede dar lugar al tipo de incomprensiones que han provocado por igual criticas desafortunadas y extensos comentarios insustanciales, algunos de los cuales es posible encontrar aún en la literatura.
34
ARAUJO, FABIO ANDERAOS DE. "Sraffa and the Labour Theory of Value: a note." Brazilian Journal of Political Economy 39, no. 4 (2019): 614–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0101-31572019-2859.
Full textAbstract:
ABSTRACT The author seeks to demonstrate that the price system proposed by Piero Sraffa in his major work Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities - Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory is compatible with both David Ricardo and Karl Marx’s labour embodied theory of value and with Adam Smith’s labour-commanded theory of value. In reality, Sraffa’s measure of prices, the Standard Commodity, satisfies rigorously the mathematical condition of invariability in relation to income distribution between wages and profits. In this sense, it offers a consistent solution to the transformation problem of embodied labour values into production prices. Besides, the Standard ratio or the maximum rate of profits R can be used to analyse the evolution of the three major types or forms of technical progress in a capitalist economy, as follows: labour-using, neutral and capital-using techniques.
35
Armitage, John, and Joanne Roberts. "The Spirit of Luxury." Cultural Politics 12, no. 1 (2016): 1–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/17432197-3436283.
Full textAbstract:
The aim of this article is to introduce and examine the concept of the “spirit of luxury.” Accordingly, we commence by delineating the philosophical idea of luxury, emphasizing its discursive meaning, and contemplating its earliest historical and etymological origins. We continue through the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries by means of a discussion of the philosophical, political, and economic writings of David Hume, Karl Marx, Thorstein Veblen, Émile Louis Victor de Laveleye, and Werner Sombart. Employing Sombart’s sociological work on the spirit of capitalism, we advance and elaborate on the notion of the spirit of luxury. Offering a “Sombartian” account of recent luxury research, specifically the core contributions to this special issue of Cultural Politics, we conclude by critically assessing the concepts of luxury, spirit, and capitalism.
36
Miller, John A. "Leaving the Sphere of Exchange with David Houston, Karl Marx, and Even Adam Smith: Insights into the Debate about Sweatshops." Review of Radical Political Economics 41, no. 3 (2009): 358–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0486613409336350.
Full text
37
Rössner, Philipp Robinson. "Introduction." History of Political Economy 53, no. 3 (2021): 371–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-8993260.
Full textAbstract:
Capitalism is often assumed to have been invented in the Anglosphere. Writings by Hume and Smith have been named as cornerstones in the making of capitalism and modern economic knowledge. But Smith’s and the other Enlightenment Scots’ works built on a commercial tradition that had been manifest in Anglo-Saxon economics since the sixteenth century or earlier. Moreover, this tradition of thinking about commercial society became quite widespread and in the seventeenth and eighteenth century extended to the entire European continent where it has become commonly known, in its manifold regional and national variants, under the general term Cameralism The usual genealogy of capitalist political economy, foundations of which were established by Marx (Capital, Vol. I), starts with William Petty, Richard Cantillon, Turgot and then winds down a well-known line from Adam Smith to David Ricardo, including John Stuart Mill, and Marx himself. The contributions made by continental Cameralists to the shaping of the political economy of modern capitalism on the other hand have tended to be overlooked. The present paper discusses the wider epistemic vantage points of the present special issue, some basic assumptions, as well as the broad contributions made by subsequent papers to the study of Cameralism not only as a near pan-European economic discourse during the early modern period, but also how different authors from a Cameralist vantage point and spectrum contributed to rise of modern economic analysis and modern political economies of capitalism.
38
Marx Ferree, Myra, Jeffrey Luppes, Randall Newnham, et al. "Book Reviews." German Politics and Society 35, no. 4 (2017): 118–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.3167/gps.2017.350406.
Full textAbstract:
Charity Scribner, After the Red Army Faction: Gender, Culture and Militancy (New York: Columbia University Press, 2015) Reviewed by Myra Marx FerreeDespina Stratigakos, Hitler at Home (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2015) Reviewed by Jeffrey LuppesCarolin Hilpert, Strategic Cultural Change and the Challenge for Security Policy: Germany and the Bundeswehr’s Deployment to Afghanistan (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014) Reviewed by Randall NewnhamKlaus Weinhauer, Anthony McElligott, and Kirsten Heinsohn, ed., Germany 1916–1923: A Revolution in Context (Bielefeld: transcript, 2016) Reviewed by David FreisEsra Özyürek, Being German, Becoming Muslim: Race, Religion, and Conversion in the New Europe (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016) Reviewed by David N. CouryAmy Austin Holmes, Social Unrest and American Military Bases in Turkey and Germany since 1945 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014) Reviewed by Carol HagerClayton J. Whisnant, Queer Identities and Politics in Germany: A History 1880-1945 (New York: Harrington Park Press, 2016) Reviewed by Angelika von WahlJames Bindenagel, Matthias Herdegen, and Karl Kaiser, ed., Internationale Sicherheit im 21. Jahrhundert: Deutschlands internationale Verantwortung (Göttingen: V&R unipress, 2016) Reviewed by Randall Newnham
39
Villa Sánchez, José Alfonso. "Sobre la importancia del método en la formación filosófica." Protrepsis, no. 13 (November 18, 2017): 19–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.32870/prot.i13.152.
Full textAbstract:
La formación profesional en filosofía debe poner la misma atención al contenido de los filósofos estudiados que al método del que dichos filósofos se valen, pues unas ideas se dejan expresar de unos modos mejor que de otros, y unos problemas filosóficos reclaman ser tratados más con un género literario que con otro. De manera que el método en filosofía no es un asunto menor en la formación del profesional de la filosofía. El presente estudio profundiza en el método utilizado por algunos pensadores consagrados en la historia de la filosofía, tomando como ejemplo algún fragmento significativo de su producción. Se trata de autores de la talla de Platón, Santo Tomás de Aquino y Søren Kierkegaard, David Hume, Friedrich Nietzsche y Ludwig Wittgenstein, Karl Marx y el trabajo conjunto de Max Horkheimer y Theodor W. Adorno, Martin Heidegger y Hans-Georg Gadamer.
40
Luna-Nemecio, Josemanuel. "Neoliberalismo y devastación ambiental: de los límites planetarios a la sustentabilidad como posibilidad histórica / Neoliberalism and environmental devastation: from the planetary boundaries to sustainability as a historical possibility." Resistances. Journal of the Philosophy of History 1, no. 2 (2020): 89–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.46652/resistances.v1i2.24.
Full textAbstract:
El presente estudio presenta la especificidad de la devastación ambiental en el marco del tipo particular de acumulación de capital y de desarrollo de fuerzas productivas técnicas y procreativas durante el neoliberalismo. El objetivo de la investigación fue ofrecer una síntesis de la teoría de Karl Marx, Jorge Veraza y Andrés Barreda para discutir con David Harvey y Joan Martínez Alier, respecto a la devastación ambiental, la acumulación por desposesión, los límites planetarios y la posibilidad histórica de alcanzar la sustentabilidad en el futuro inmediato. La investigación se basó en un análisis documental genético estructural. El estudio plantea tres resultados particulares sobre la devastación ambiental contemporánea: se le considera como un producto específico del neoliberalismo; es un resultado de una acumulación residual y termina de capital y de unas fuerzas ambientalmente destructivas; los imaginarios de la sostenibilidad son posibles respuestas de superación de los límites planetarios.
41
Macdonald, Bradley J. "The Young Karl Marx: German Philosophy, Modern Politics, and Human Flourishing. By David Leopold. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007. 338p. $115.00 cloth, $34.99 paper." Perspectives on Politics 8, no. 1 (2010): 343–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1537592709992337.
Full text
42
Del Valle Sánchez, Manuel, Braulio Morales Morales, and Arturo Perales Salvador. "ELABORACIÓN DE PLANES LOCALES DE DESARROLLO EN LA COMUNIDAD LAS LAJAS, SANTIAGO TULANTEPEC, HIDALGO." SEMESTRE ECONÓMICO 4, no. 2 (2018): 134–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.26867/seconomico.v4i2.119.
Full textAbstract:
El presente trabajo fue presentado en la Universidad Nacional del Altiplano-Puno. Perú en la Escuela de Postgrado en la maestría en Economía con motivo de cumplir 50 años de su creación en el seminario Internacional de planificación y Gestión del desarrollo, Puno al 2030 en los días 29 y 30 de septiembre del 2014.
 Las teorías del desarrollo tienen una preocupación y origen desde los primeros economistas llamados clásicos, para tratar de explicar los diferentes niveles de desarrollo de los países, desde el mercantilismo, el capitalismo manufacturero del siglo XVIII ( Adam Smith, David Ricardo) y el desarrollo del capitalismo Industrial del siglo XIX (Carlos Marx, Walras, Jevons, Marshall,). En el siglo XX surgen interpretaciones del desarrollo, en los años 40´s y 50´s (Lewis,Harrod, Domar, Solow etc.) tratan de teorizar y de explicar esa dicotomía entre los países desarrollados y los subdesarrollados desde una visión analítica e histórica. La teoría convencional de la economía (neoclásica), ponía de modelo a los países industrializados. En los 90´s, Amartya Sen introduce el Índice de Desarrollo Humano (IDH) con nuevos indicadores y posteriormente el ambiental, las políticas públicas afrontan los diversos problemas de los países desarrollados, las economías denominadas emergentes y los menos desarrollados. En el siglo XXI la elaboración de planes y diagnósticos se convierten en un instrumento principal para detectar la problemática de las comunidades y orientar las acciones en una economía global.
43
Moskowitz, Alex. "Economic Imperception; or, Reading Capital on the Beach with Thoreau." American Literary History 32, no. 2 (2020): 221–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/alh/ajaa008.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract This essay argues that throughout his oeuvre, Henry David Thoreau develops a theory of sensory perception that comes to its literary culmination in Cape Cod (1865). I argue that Thoreau’s thinking on the senses demonstrates that the senses are a product of historical development. In Cape Cod, Thoreau is particularly interested in how economic interest has trained the senses to become structurally incapable of sensing the death that is a necessary part of the commodity form and social life in general—similar to what Karl Marx in Capital (1867) would describe as “dead labor.” This essay explores how in Cape Cod, Thoreau offers his reader a method of reading that seeks to make legible through literary form—specifically through puns, metaphor, and juxtaposition—the point at which the senses fail. Thoreau’s method in Cape Cod therefore differs from his more well-known works such as Walden (1854), where he only explicitly tells his readers about that to which they are blind. Ultimately, I claim that Thoreau’s political message throughout his career remains much the same, but the way in which he mobilizes literary form to convey that message marks an important change in how we might make sense of—and make sensible—political economy.
44
SENGUPTA, PROMONA. "Doing ‘Social Practice’: Political Strategies of Truth Generation for the Friendly Neighbourhood Theatre Historian." Theatre Research International 44, no. 02 (2019): 203–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0307883319000087.
Full textAbstract:
To articulate what is past does not mean to recognize ‘how it really was.’ It means to take control of a memory, as it flashes in a moment of danger.The last two years have seen some significant anniversaries being celebrated – one hundred years of the Bolshevik Revolution, fifty years since May 1968, two hundred years since the birth of Karl Marx and, most recently, the birth centenary of Rosa Luxemburg. As a student activist more or less masquerading as an amateur theatre historian, I have never felt more in need of the tools of my so-called trade than during these interesting times when I found myself assiduously attending conferences, memorials, re-enactments and commemorative performances earmarking moments of radical histories. David Wiles's article, charting the contours – often clear and sometimes obscure – of the field of theatre history as it stands at the moment brings into relief some of the questions that have been running in the background of the heady extended solidarity party that has been my engagement with the field in recent times, resonating with his conclusion of history-writing as ‘practice, not product’. I will attempt to glean from Wiles's reflections some points that I feel may be important for scholars for whom history writing is most certainly a ‘social practice’, if not also a deeply political act.
45
Medema, Steven G. "THE ECONOMIST AND THE ECONOMIST’S AUDIENCE." Journal of the History of Economic Thought 41, no. 03 (2019): 335–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s105383721900018x.
Full textAbstract:
The history of economics, properly read, is very much a history of economics in the public sphere. Sir William Petty developed his most important insights in the process of providing advice on taxation to the monarch. Adam Smith wrote with a view to influencing the habits of thought of both the educated layman and policy makers. Jane Marcet and Harriet Martineau brought early classical political economy to the masses. David Ricardo formulated foundational elements of the nineteenth-century classical system writing policy pamphlets and then entered Parliament with a view to putting policy making on a solid economic footing. Karl Marx’s intended audience was anything but the practitioners of the emerging science of political economy. Alfred Marshall buried his technical analysis in appendices to maximize the exposure of his work. John Maynard Keynes’s influence can be ascribed, without too much injustice, as much to his effectiveness outside the walls of Cambridge as within them and to the use by others of his ideas in that same public realm. Yet, despite this lengthy history of economists’ engagements with various publics, including those pulling the levers of policy, those writing on the history of economics have focused far more intently on the history of theory and the implications for the construction of a body of thought known as “economic analysis” than on the interplay among economists, economic ideas, and the public realm. It is as if the economic conversation went on solely within the space of academic departments of economics, even though those spaces are very recent creations.
46
Ingram, David. "FROM POLITICAL TO HUMAN EMANCIPATION - David Leopold: The Young Karl Marx: German Philosophy, Modern Politics, and Human Flourishing (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007. Pp. xii, 315. $110.00.)." Review of Politics 71, no. 3 (2009): 500–505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s003467050999012x.
Full text
47
Bhandai, Mediani. "Theories and Contemporary Development of Organizational Perspectives in Social Sciences. The founding writers of Western sociology. Part 1." ASEJ Scientific Journal of Bielsko-Biala School of Finance and Law 24, no. 1 (2020): 8–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.1342.
Full textAbstract:
This paper is purely theoretical in which I have illustrated the contributions of the founding theorist of Western sociology, by focusing on how they addressed (or didn’t address) organizations. Then, I have discussed (in brief) the development of organizational theory and how organizational theorists are responding to the emergence of challenges to the traditional rational approaches to understanding organizations. These analyses are situated on the historical contexts include major contributions of each theorist. This research is solely based on the secondary information. Paper contents four Sections: first the work of the three founding theorists of Western Sociology, Karl Marx; Émile Durkheim and Max Weber, secondly, I have exemplified the development of organizational theory and the emergence of challenges to the traditional rational approaches to understand the organization; where I have analyzed the work of Classical theorists- Max Weber, Henri Fayol, Frederick Taylor, Luther Halsey Gulick, Herbert A. Simon, Berton H. Kaplan, modern theorist- Michel Foucault, Jurgen Habermas, Jacques Derrida, Jurgen Habermas etc. Third Section covers the contemporary theories and perspectives. In this section I have exemplified how Philip Selznick, Peter Blau, James David Thompson and Charles Perrow incorporated the Weber notion of bureaucracy followed by DiMaggio, Paul, J. and Walter W. Powell etc. and in forth section, covers the feminist approach in theory building with focus of organizational analysis (with the focus of Arlene Daniels, Dorothy Smith, Marjorie DeVault, Gisela Bock and Susan James, Martha Calas, Linda Smircich etc. work). This paper has detailed footnotes quoted from the original sources and contents useful reference of the sociological theory and practices for concerned social scientist to build their knowledge base and research direction.
48
Bhandai, Mediani. "Theories and Contemporary Development of Organizational Perspectives in Social Sciences. The development of organizational theory and the emergence of challenges to the traditional rational approaches to understand the organization. Part 2." ASEJ Scientific Journal of Bielsko-Biala School of Finance and Law 24, no. 1 (2020): 14–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.1343.
Full textAbstract:
This paper is purely theoretical in which I have illustrated the contributions of the founding theorist of Western sociology, by focusing on how they addressed (or didn’t address) organizations. Then, I have discussed (in brief) the development of organizational theory and how organizational theorists are responding to the emergence of challenges to the traditional rational approaches to understanding organizations. These analyses are situated on the historical contexts include major contributions of each theorist. This research is solely based on the secondary information. Paper contents four Sections: first the work of the three founding theorists of Western Sociology, Karl Marx; Émile Durkheim and Max Weber, secondly, I have exemplified the development of organizational theory and the emergence of challenges to the traditional rational approaches to understand the organization; where I have analyzed the work of Classical theorists- Max Weber, Henri Fayol, Frederick Taylor, Luther Halsey Gulick, Herbert A. Simon, Berton H. Kaplan, modern theorist- Michel Foucault, Jurgen Habermas, Jacques Derrida, Jurgen Habermas etc. Third Section covers the contemporary theories and perspectives. In this section I have exemplified how Philip Selznick, Peter Blau, James David Thompson and Charles Perrow incorporated the Weber notion of bureaucracy followed by DiMaggio, Paul, J. and Walter W. Powell etc. and in forth section, covers the feminist approach in theory building with focus of organizational analysis (with the focus of Arlene Daniels, Dorothy Smith, Marjorie DeVault, Gisela Bock and Susan James, Martha Calas, Linda Smircich etc. work). This paper has detailed footnotes quoted from the original sources and contents useful reference of the sociological theory and practices for concerned social scientist to build their knowledge base and research direction.
49
Bhandai, Mediani. "Theories and Contemporary Development of Organizational Perspectives in Social Sciences. Feminist approach to organizational analysis. Part 3." ASEJ Scientific Journal of Bielsko-Biala School of Finance and Law 24, no. 1 (2020): 20–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.1344.
Full textAbstract:
This paper is purely theoretical in which I have illustrated the contributions of the founding theorist of Western sociology, by focusing on how they addressed (or didn’t address) organizations. Then, I have discussed (in brief) the development of organizational theory and how organizational theorists are responding to the emergence of challenges to the traditional rational approaches to understanding organizations. These analyses are situated on the historical contexts include major contributions of each theorist. This research is solely based on the secondary information. Paper contents four Sections: first the work of the three founding theorists of Western Sociology, Karl Marx; Émile Durkheim and Max Weber, secondly, I have exemplified the development of organizational theory and the emergence of challenges to the traditional rational approaches to understand the organization; where I have analyzed the work of Classical theorists- Max Weber, Henri Fayol, Frederick Taylor, Luther Halsey Gulick, Herbert A. Simon, Berton H. Kaplan, modern theorist- Michel Foucault, Jurgen Habermas, Jacques Derrida, Jurgen Habermas etc. Third Section covers the contemporary theories and perspectives. In this section I have exemplified how Philip Selznick, Peter Blau, James David Thompson and Charles Perrow incorporated the Weber notion of bureaucracy followed by DiMaggio, Paul, J. and Walter W. Powell etc. and in forth section, covers the feminist approach in theory building with focus of organizational analysis (with the focus of Arlene Daniels, Dorothy Smith, Marjorie DeVault, Gisela Bock and Susan James, Martha Calas, Linda Smircich etc. work). This paper has detailed footnotes quoted from the original sources and contents useful reference of the sociological theory and practices for concerned social scientist to build their knowledge base and research direction.
50
Djera, Adelvia Tamu Ina Pay. "ALIENASI ISRAEL UTARA." Pute Waya : Sociology of Religion Journal 1, no. 01 (2021): 24–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.51667/pwjsa.v1i01.217.
Full textAbstract:
Masyarakat sebagai elemen dasar dari peradaban manusia, sejatinya terbentuk dalam berbagai upaya dan interaksi sosial. Interaksi yang terjalin disebabkan oleh berbagai aspek, hubungan biologis, lokasi tempat tinggal, suku, pemahaman ideologi yang sama termasuk usaha untuk mencapai tujuan bersama melalui kesepakatan-kesepakatan sosial tertentu yang mengikat. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji fenomena ini dengan teori Karl Marx sebagai acuan dari munculnya konflik dalam kehidupan Bangsa Israel, lebih lanjut didukung oleh beberapa teori sosial lainnya. Adapun tulisan ini menggunakan metode hermeneutik untuk memahami situasi sosio-historis dari keberadaan Israel dan menganalisanya sesuai dengan teori-teori sosial. Dinamika sosial kehidupan bangsa Israel menunjukkan bahwa sebagai komunitas,yaitu komunitas yang bersatu pada masa kepemimpinan Daud (Israel Bersatu) dan terpecah pada masa pemerintahan Salomo menjadi Israel Selatan dan Israel Utara.
 KEPUSTAKAAN 
 Bernhard W. Anderson. The Books of the Bible. New York: CSS, 1991.
 Elly M. Setiadi & Usman Kolip. Pengantar Sosiologi: Teori, Aplikasi dan 
 Pemecahannya. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2011.
 George Ritzer & Douglas J.Goodman. Teori Sosiologi: Dari Teori Sosiologi Klask 
 sampai perkembangan terakhir teori sosial postmodern. Bantul: Kreasi Wacana, 2016.
 Heine Andersen & Lars Bo Kaspersen. Classical and Modern Social Theory. Malden:
 Blackwell Publishers, 2000.
 John A. Titaley. Persepuluhan dalam Alkitab Ibrani Israel Alkitab. Salatiga: Satya
 Wacana Press, 2016.
 Norman K. Gottwald. The Hebrew Bible: A Socio-Literary Introduction. Philadelphia:
 Fortress Press, 1985.
 Norman K. Gottwald. The Tribes of YHWH: A Sosiology of The Religion of Liberated Israel.
 New York: Orbis Book, 1979.
 Norman K. Gottwald. The Politics of Ancient Israel. Louisville Kentucky:Westminster John
 Knox Press, 2001.
 Robert B. Coote & David Robert Ord. Sejarah Pertama Alkitab: Dari Eden hingga 
 Kerajaan Daud berdasarkan Sumber Y. BPK Gunung Mulia; Satya Wacana Press,
 2015.
 Robert B. Coote. Demi Membela Revolusi: Sejarah Elohist. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia,
 2011.
 Soerjono Soekanto. Sosiologi: Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 1982.
 Samuel Koenig. Mand and Society, the basic teaching of sociology. New York: Barners &
 Noble Inc, 1957