Relevant bibliographies by topics / Robert Nozick

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters

Academic literature on the topic 'Robert Nozick'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 25 April 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Robert Nozick.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Robert Nozick"

1

Gendler, T. S. "Robert Nozick." Philosophical Review 112, no. 1 (January 1, 2003): 106–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00318108-112-1-106.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Sahd, Luiz Felipe Netto de Andrade e. Silva. "O ESTADO MÍNIMO DE ROBERT NOZICK." Síntese: Revista de Filosofia 31, no. 100 (May 20, 2010): 225. http://dx.doi.org/10.20911/21769389v31n100p225-238/2004.

Full text
Abstract:
O presente artigo tem como objetivo reconstruir argumentos centrais desenvolvidos por Robert Nozick, acerca das posições extremas que não diferenciam Estado-providência e Estado totalitário na política dos libertarianos norte-americanos, isto é, sobre as afinidades percebidas por Nozick com as teses desta corrente de pensamento, embora se afastando num ponto essencial: a questão do Estado. Ao contrário da teoria anarquista, o Estado mínimo é preferível ao estado de natureza, tal como John Locke o descreve. De fato, o estado de natureza expõe, segundo Nozick, os indivíduos a todo tipo de violência que nenhum “sistema de proteção privado” bastaria para evitar. O remédio para as violações dos contratos consiste na criação de um sistema de proteção público dotado oficialmente do monopólio do uso da força.Abstract: The present article aims at reconstructing Robert Nozick’s central arguments about the extreme positions held by North American libertarians who do not distinguish between Welfare State and Totalitarian State. Despite divergences on a pivotal question, that of the State, there are some affinities between Nozick and this current of thought. Contrary to the anarchist theory, the Minimal State is preferable to the state of nature as described by John Locke. According to Nozick, the state of nature exposes individuals to all kinds of violence from which no “private assurance system” whatsoever can protect them. The remedy for the breach of contracts resides in the creation of a public system of protection that officially holds the monopoly of the use of force.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Boaheng, Paul, and Wesley Cooper. "Robert Nozick, Libertarian?" South African Journal of Philosophy 30, no. 3 (January 2011): 257–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/sajpem.v30i3.69575.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Uszkai, Radu. "Robert Nozick’s Evolutionist Turn in Ethics." Balkan Journal of Philosophy 10, no. 2 (2018): 115–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/bjp201810213.

Full text
Abstract:
The purpose of the present study is that of examining what I call Robert Nozick’s “evolutionist turn” in ethics. More specifically, my aim is to provide an answer to the following question: what type of ethical theory does Robert Nozick sketch in his last book, Invariances? My first objective will be that of delineating the philosophical framework which will accommodate my future discussion, highlighting the distinction between the metaphysical and scientific approaches to ethics as proposed by Ken Binmore, but also Emanuel Socaciu's taxonomy of ethical theories, which stems from the particular way in which moral philosophers tackle the nature of ethical norms and moral motivation. I then set forth to show that, in the philosophical framework previously described, Robert Nozick's approach from Anarchy, State, and Utopia should be seen as a metaphysical one. The last and most important part of my study aims to show how Nozick's “evolutionist turn” took place and developed, from his perspective on rationality in The Nature of Rationality, to his ethical theory advanced in Invariances.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Stout, Jeffrey. "Philosophical Explanations. Robert Nozick." Journal of Religion 65, no. 1 (January 1985): 133–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/487200.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Lillehammer, H. "Socratic Puzzles. Robert Nozick." Mind 110, no. 439 (July 1, 2001): 802–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mind/110.439.802.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Persson, Zngmar. "Robert Nozick Philosophical Explanations." Theoria 47, no. 3 (February 11, 2008): 160–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-2567.1981.tb00477.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Asquin, Nicholas. "Nozick, Entitlement Theory and the Justification for Maximizing Individual Freedoms." Political Science Undergraduate Review 1, no. 1 (October 15, 2015): 7–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.29173/psur4.

Full text
Abstract:
The purpose of this paper was, in explaining Robert Nozick’s ‘Entitlement theory’, to argue whether his ideas of ‘just acquisition’ and ‘self-ownership’ provided sufficient justification for maximizing individual freedom. In this paper I examined the key principles of Entitlement theory Nozick uses, in conjuncture to his concepts of ‘self-ownership and ‘just acquisition’, to justify his conception of freedom. I performed this by exploring the implications of these principles and the extent to which they are logically coherent with the rest of his theory after first laying out the definitions of the terms Nozick uses as a foundation. Although I found that Nozick provides a couple of compelling cases that support his theory, Entitlement theory in general falls short of complete justification for maximized personal freedoms due to unaddressed problems with his concepts of ‘self-ownership’ and ‘just acquisition’. Namely, that the extent which to these concepts apply eventually create situations in which the natural execution of Nozick’s acquisition and transfer rights can impede on the rights of others, undermining his theory.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Bracho Fuenmayor, Pedro Luis. "Justicia desde la óptica de John Rawls y Robert Nozick: una perspectiva comparada." Cuestiones Políticas 39, no. 70 (October 10, 2021): 44–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3970.02.

Full text
Abstract:
In this research the objective was to analyze justice considering the optics of John Rawls and Robert Nozick, from a comparative perspective. A documentary review of the bibliographic material on Rawls' Theory of Justice (1975) and Nozick's Anarchy, State and Utopia (1988) was carried out, also considering the knowledge of different experts on the subject. It is qualitative research of descriptive type, with a methodological design of theoretical, documentary, and diachronic cut. In relation to the data collection technique, the registration or registration of author, documentary and content references was used. As a result, it was possible to establish an analytical comparison referring to some outstanding criteria on the notion of justice, especially in relation to how the ownership and distribution of wealth is assumed, according to both philosophers, the action of the State, for Rawls of great inherence and for Nozick of minimal participation. It can be concluded from this analysis that there are antagonisms between these two philosophers because for Rawls justice is framed in a social egalitarianism, where society is something ideal, abstract, while Nozick assumes it within the thought of conservative liberalism, considering a real and concrete society.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Schaefer, David Lewis. "PROCEDURAL VERSUS SUBSTANTIVE JUSTICE: RAWLS AND NOZICK." Social Philosophy and Policy 24, no. 1 (December 18, 2006): 164–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0265052507070070.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper critically assesses the “procedural” accounts of political justice set forth by John Rawls in A Theory of Justice (1971) and Robert Nozick in Anarchy, State, and Utopia (1974). I argue that the areas of agreement between Rawls and Nozick are more significant than their disagreements. Even though Nozick offers trenchant criticisms of Rawls's argument for economic redistribution (the “difference principle”), Nozick's own economic libertarianism is undermined by his “principle of rectification,” which he offers as a possible ground in practice for the application of something like the difference principle. Both Rawls's and Nozick's accounts of justice fail because of their abstraction from human nature as a ground of right. At the same time the libertarianism on which they agree in the non-economic sphere would deprive a free society of its necessary moral underpinning. Rawls and Nozick err, finally, by demanding that the policies pursued by a just society conform to theoretical formulas concocted by philosophy professors, rather than leaving room (as Lockean liberalism does) for the adjustment of policies to particular circumstances based on statesmen's prudential judgment and the consent of the governed. Particularly troubling from the perspective of a citizen seriously concerned with the advancement of justice and freedom is both thinkers' shrill denunciations of existing liberal societies for failing to conform to their particular strictures.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Robert Nozick"

1

Michel, Voltaire de Freitas. "Os fundamentos do liberalismo em Robert Nozick." reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRGS, 2003. http://hdl.handle.net/10183/104819.

Full text
Abstract:
A dissertação propõe o exame da teoria da justiça e do Estado apresentadas pelo filósofo americano Robert Nozick em sua obra Anarchy, State and Utopia (1974). Na primeira parte do trabalho, três conceitos fundamentais da tradição liberal clássica são examinados: estado de natureza, justiça e direitos, e Estado Liberal. Os paradigmas adotados são John Locke e Immanuel Kant. O primeiro, porque Nozick parte de pressupostos lockeanos para desenvolver sua teoria do Estado. O segundo, pelo paralelismo entre a concepção de justiça de Nozick e a do filósofo alemão. Na segunda parte da dissertação, procede-se ao exame do modo como Nozick abordou os conceitos a que alude a parte inicial do trabalho. A conclusão propõe identificar as aproximações e divergências de Nozick com a sua própria tradição.
This work proposes the examination of Robert Nozick‟s Theory of justice and state in his book Anarchy, state and Utopia (1974). In the first part, three main concepts of the classical liberal tradition are sutied: state of nature, justice and rights, and the Liberal State. The thought of John Locke and Immanuel Kant are the adopted paradigms. The former, because Nozick assumes lockean concepts to develop his theory of the state. The later, because of the approximation between Nozick‟s concepts of justice and the one of the philosofy born in Könisberg. In the second part, the object is to undercover how Nozick described the same main concepts of the classical liberal tradition. Conclusively, this work proposes to identify the convergences and divergences between nozick and his own tradition.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Blume, G. Gerhardt. "The critical trajectory of the Nozickean philosophy : from social atomism and a libertarian doctrine grounded thereupon to an interpretive-holistic conception of identity reaching toward a Post-Modern politic /." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1997. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk2/ftp04/mq22515.pdf.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Roussel, Diane. "La liberté et la propriété chez Robert Nozick." Thesis, University of Ottawa (Canada), 1990. http://hdl.handle.net/10393/5811.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Driessen, Bartholomeus Eduard Peter. "Van utopie naar anarchie : een kritische studie van de politieke theorie van Robert Nozick /." Voorschoten : B. Driessen, 1990. http://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb355335479.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Knoll, Bodo. "Minimalstaat eine Auseinandersetzung mit Robert Nozicks Argumenten." Tübingen Mohr Siebeck, 2007. http://d-nb.info/98896192X/04.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Bulnes, Beniscelli Blas. "De la libertad al estado: análisis comparativo de la obra de Wolff y Nozick." Tesis, Universidad de Chile, 2009. http://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/108583.

Full text
Abstract:
Tesis para optar al grado de Magister en Filosofía mención Axiología y Filosofía Política
Años atrás la opinión pública vio como un grupo de jóvenes arrojaba un arma incendiaria contra el palacio La Moneda (símbolo del Estado en Chile). Dicho grupo se auto identificaba como “Movimiento Anarquista” y predicaban más o menos lo mismo que el movimiento anarquista español (o CNT) que luchó en contra de la dictadura franquista; me refiero a un rechazo a la autoridad del Estado. También, desde hace algunos años, vemos como otro grupo le exige al Estado lo mismo que aquel grupo de jóvenes. Ahora, eso sí, no se trata de jóvenes protestando; se trata de gente algo mayor identificados con los altos poderes económicos del país que, con corbatas y ternos exigen algo similar: un Estado que no se entrometa es sus acciones. Pero ¿Qué tienen en común estos grupos tan disímiles? ¿Por qué culpan al Estado de sus males? ¿Qué hace el Estado en su contra? ¿Será que al menos, en esencia, comparten ideas similares? La primera respuesta que a cualquiera que se le viene a la cabeza sobre estos cuestionamientos es que claramente este rechazo de la autoridad del Estado tiene algo que ver con nuestra Libertad. Pareciese, según lo creen algunos, que el gran problema que ven en el Estado es que éste intefiere con nuestra Libertad y con nuestras decisiones; pareciese que el Estado les ata las manos y no les deja actuar a sus anchas. De este modo, si es que aceptásemos que estas respuestas instintivas tienen algo de verdad, deberíamos aceptar también que, por lo menos en apariciencia, estos grupos sostienen que el Estado necesariamente viola Libertades. ¿No sería más sensato ver al Estado como institución política que trata de promover nuestra Libertad? En esta tesis trataremos de mostrar las soluciones teóricas que estas posiciones han dado a estas interrogantes junto con tratar de resolver la cuestión de si estas posturas sotienen una semejanza significativa. Para esto, nuestra primera labor será posicionar filosóficamente lo que representan estas posturas. Respecto a las posiciones Anarquistas, no hay ningún problema ya que dicha postura tiene una vasta defensa teórica representada por un largo historial de pensadores. Respecto a los grupos que exigen más libertad al Estado y que representan a altos poderes económicos del país es algo más complejo, filosóficamente hablando. Es fácil encontrar un correlato teórico en términos económicos (se les suele llamar capitalistas, libre cambistas, liberales, etc.), no obstante en términos filosóficos no es tan claro a quién representan. Descartamos a los liberales (principalmente a los de corte ralwsiano) ya que sus posiciones no representan una confrontación directa entre las Libertades y el Estado. Creemos que la posición filosófica que más se ajusta a dicha descripción son los Libertarios ya que estos serían quienes extreman el rasgo de la libertad en su argumentación que incluso se acentúa cuando hablamos sobre derechos de propiedad.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Salido, Pla Juan. "La ética y la racionalidad instrumental en el neocontractualismo político de Robert Nozick." Doctoral thesis, Universitat de Barcelona, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/133595.

Full text
Abstract:
Esta tesis doctoral tiene como objetivo estudiar el pensamiento moral y político de Robert Nozick para demostrar que Nozick, en su obra “Anarquía, Estado y utopía”, no forma un Estado mínimo ni el equivalente al Estado gendarme de la teoría liberal clásica. Lo que forma Nozick son unas mutuas aseguradoras de carácter privado que podrían servir para administrar a la sociedad. Para efectuar su despliegue argumentativo desde el estado de naturaleza de John Locke, Nozick, a diferencia de otros pensadores, no privatiza el Estado sino que construye desde un principio una sociedad utópica en la que no existe el Estado. Las agencias de protección sirven para administrar la sociedad donde viven los clientes de la misma que contratan con sus agencias de forma libre y voluntaria. Aquellos individuos que no quieren contratar con las agencias de protección privadas que actúan en un territorio determinado no tienen por qué hacerlo y nadie puede obligarles a ello a diferencia de nuestros Estados que nos afilian a ellos sin nuestro consentimiento explícito y de forma obligatoria. El pensamiento racional es utilizado en la obra política de Nozick de forma instrumental para formar una utopía en la que el individuo de una sociedad pasa de ser ciudadano a “cliente “de una institución privada que administra la sociedad. Mientras que entre las relaciones contractuales entre individuos, todos los neocontractualistas (como Hayek, Rothbard, Buchanan, Apel o Habermas) parecen buscar explícitamente la justicia y la equidad, Nozick parece buscar la permisibilidad moral de las relaciones entre individuos más allá de las relaciones propias del noecontractualismo político al defender la vida ética y las virtudes morales (como la no instrumentalización de un individuo por otro o valorar a un individuo como un fin y no utilizarlo como un medio forjando una organización de la sociedad que permita a los individuos, tal como dice Nozick en Anarchy, State and utopia, pg. 334, “ser inviolables en el uso de sus derechos y libertades individuales, no ser tratados como instrumentos o recursos con la dignidad que esto supone permitiendo a cada individuo, individualmente o con quien él decida, decidir sobre su vida y alcanzar sus fines personales y profesionales ayudados por otros individuos a través de la cooperación y no de la competición ni confrontación, que posean la misma dignidad”) e incluyendo las relaciones contractuales dentro de la necesidad de obedecer a esa eticidad. De esta manera es como Nozick desea que se relacionen los individuos que podrían convivir en la sociedad utópica creada por él en Anarquía, Estado y utopía.” También ha sido la intención de esta tesis colocar el pensamiento de Nozick dentro de la Historia para ver que su utopía es una obra atractiva y sugestiva en sintonía con los padres fundadores de los Estados Unidos de América, con el espíritu de la declaración de independencia, con la ideología de los pensadores liberales libertarios y anarcoindividualistas estadounidenses, con los fundadores de sociedades utópicas en los Estados Unidos en el siglo XlX e incluso con pensadores anarquistas europeos como Bakunin y Kropotkin.
This doctoral tesis has the paramount goal to study the political and moral thought of Robert Nozick developed in “Anarchy, State and utopia”. We say that the mutual protection associations of Nozick are a Scheme of private associations and, therefore, a very different institution of the minimal State (night-watchman State). Nozick starts his Framework from de John Locke’s state of nature. Nozick doesn’t destroy the State or privatize it. Robert Nozick creates a society without State. The Mutual protection associations are private institutions and maintain the under control of the society. The liberal contractualism is developed from the ethical thought and rational mind. The men and woman who don’t want to join with the agency are free to do it. This question is an important difference about the organization of under control of our societies because, for all of us, the affiliation to the State is compulsory. The change is very important. With the mutual protection associations of Nozick, the citizen become a customer. Several questions about the moral thought of Robert Nozick are studied. The goal is to see that Nozick doesn’t a selfish-man; his philosophy of individualism is an instrument to protect the individual freedom of all men and woman. The framework of Nozick “treats the individuals, who may not be used in certain ways by others as means or tools or instruments or resources; it treat us as persons having individual rights with the dignity this constitutes. Treating the individuals with respect by respecting their rights, it allows to the individuals, individually or with whom they choose, to choose their life and to realize their ends and their life with liberty, aided by the voluntary cooperation of other individuals possessing the same dignity.” This is the goal of the framework of Robert Nozick developed in “Anarchy, State and utopia.”
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Tocchetto, Daniela Goya. "Julgamentos de justiça distributiva em John Rawls e Robert Nozick : uma investigação experimental." reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRGS, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/10183/15269.

Full text
Abstract:
No presente trabalho, é realizado um experimento para investigar as escolhas entre distintas distribuições de renda, sob diferentes conjuntos informacionais. Os indivíduos são defrontados com distribuições baseadas nas teorias de John Rawls (2002), Robert Nozick (1991) e duas distribuições mistas, sob dois tratamentos distintos: o primeiro com o véu de ignorância da teoria rawlsiana e, o segundo, sem o véu de ignorância. Os resultados revelaram um maior número de escolhas do modelo rawlsiano sob o véu de ignorância, enquanto no tratamento sem véu a maioria dos participantes escolheu o modelo de Nozick, ainda que sob esse tratamento o padrão de escolhas tenha sido mais homogêneo. Esses resultados indicam a instabilidade de princípios escolhidos sob o véu de ignorância.
This work provides a synthesis of three theories of justice: from Rawls, Nozick and the utilitarian theory. Then an experiment is proposed, aimed to investigate choices of distributive justice based on these theories. The individuals are confronted with different income distributions, under two distinct informational treatments: the first with a veil of ignorance and, the second, with no veil of ignorance. The results point to a majority of choices of the rawlsian principle under the veil of ignorance treatment, while under the non veil of ignorance treatment there is a majority of choices of Nozick’s model of distribution of income. These results indicate the instability of principles of justice chosen under the veil of ignorance.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Leung, Sing-chow. "Social justice : a critical comparison of the theories of Robert Nozick and John Rawls /." [Hong Kong : University of Hong Kong], 1987. http://sunzi.lib.hku.hk/hkuto/record.jsp?B12335708.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

梁醒洲 and Sing-chow Leung. "Social justice: a critical comparison of the theories of Robert Nozick and John Rawls." Thesis, The University of Hong Kong (Pokfulam, Hong Kong), 1987. http://hub.hku.hk/bib/B31207753.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Robert Nozick"

1

Robert Nozick. New York: Continuum International Pub. Group, 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Robert Nozick. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 2001.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Robert Nozick. Chesham, Bucks: Acumen, 2001.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Bader, Ralf M. Robert Nozick. New York: Continuum International Pub. Group, 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Robert Nozick: Property, justice, and the minimal state. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 1991.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Wolff, Jonathan. Robert Nozick: Property, justice and the minimal state. Oxford: Polity Press in association with Basil Blackwell, 1991.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Robert Nozick: Property, justice and the minimal state. Oxford: Polity Press in association with Basil Blackwell, 1991.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Scattone, Giovanni. Due filosofie della libertà: Karl Popper e Robert Nozick. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino, 2002.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Castiñeira, Angel. Els límits de l'Estat: El cas de Robert Nozick. Barcelona: Centre d'Estudis de Temes Contemporanis, 1994.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Blomgren, Anna-Maria. Nyliberal politisk filosofi: En kritisk analys av Milton Friedman, Robert Nozick och F.A. Hayek. Nora: Nya doxa, 1997.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Robert Nozick"

1

Varden, Helga. "Nozick, Robert." In Encyclopedia of Global Justice, 760–62. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9160-5_41.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Batt, Helge. "Nozick, Robert." In Kindlers Literatur Lexikon (KLL), 1. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05728-0_15770-1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Coffee, Alan M. S. J. "Nozick, Robert." In Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, 1–5. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_194-2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Scruton, Roger. "Robert Nozick." In Conservative Texts, 227–41. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21728-1_16.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Lüthy, Herbert. "Robert Nozick (1938–2002)." In Die Fairness-Formel, 71–76. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07956-7_8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Binmore, Kenneth. "Robert Nozick Versus David Lewis." In Imaginary Philosophical Dialogues, 181–87. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65387-3_31.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Barry, Norman P. "Robert Nozick and the Minimal State." In On Classical Liberalism and Libertarianism, 132–60. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1987. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18727-0_8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Batt, Helge. "Nozick, Robert: Anarchy, State, and Utopia." In Kindlers Literatur Lexikon (KLL), 1–2. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05728-0_15771-1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Machan, Tibor R. "Robert Nozick and the Libertarian Alternative." In Libertarianism Defended, 163–83. London: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315250526-13.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Niesen, Peter. "Die politische Theorie des Libertarianismus: Robert Nozick und Friedrich A. von Hayek." In Politische Theorien der Gegenwart I, 77–117. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-94929-5_3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Robert Nozick' for particular source types:
Journal articles Dissertations / Theses Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography