Academic literature on the topic 'Roman law. Vis major (Civil law)'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Roman law. Vis major (Civil law).'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Roman law. Vis major (Civil law)"
Bartoszewicz, Anna. "UZNANIE ZA ZMARŁEGO I STWIERDZENIE ZGONU (GENEZA, ROZWÓJ INSTYTUCJI I POSTĘPOWANIA)." Zeszyty Prawnicze 7, no. 2 (2017): 147. http://dx.doi.org/10.21697/zp.2007.7.2.05.
Full textYABLOCHKOV, T. M. "THE CONCEPT OF VIS MAJOR IN CIVIL LAW." Civil Law Review 18, no. 3 (2018): 202–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.24031/1992-2043-2018-18-3-202-237.
Full textPerry, Diana. "Paridis de Puteo: A Fifteenth-Century Civilian’s Concept of Papal Sovereignty." Studies in Church History. Subsidia 9 (1987): 369–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0143045900002052.
Full textvan Caenegem, Raoul. "The modernity of medieval law." European Review 8, no. 1 (2000): 37–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1062798700004531.
Full textSzczygielski, Krzysztof. "ROMANISTYKA POLSKA W LATACH 1918-1945 (PRZEGLĄD BIBLIOGRAFII)." Zeszyty Prawnicze 10, no. 2 (2016): 355. http://dx.doi.org/10.21697/zp.2010.10.2.22.
Full textBartis, Előd. "A megbízási szerződés szabályozásának történeti vázlata Romániában." Erdélyi Jogélet 3, no. 1 (2020): 5–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.47745/erjog.2020.01.01.
Full textJanku, Martin. "Contractual Penalty and the Right to Payment for Delays Caused by Force Majeure in Czech Civil Law under the New Civil Code." DANUBE: Law and Economics Review 6, no. 4 (2015): 259–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/danb-2015-0016.
Full textVasiljević, Mirko. "Company law of the twenty-first century." Revija Kopaonicke skole prirodnog prava 3, no. 1 (2021): 51–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/rkspp2101051v.
Full textBiasi, Marco. "‘We will all laugh at gilded butterflies’. The shadow of antitrust law on the collective negotiation of fair fees for self-employed workers." European Labour Law Journal 9, no. 4 (2018): 354–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2031952518810640.
Full textPoesche, Jürgen. "Conflict of Ethics: Indigenous Americans and Settler Colonists = Conflicto de ética: Los pueblos indígenas y los colonos en las Américas." EUNOMÍA. Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad, no. 18 (April 1, 2020): 29. http://dx.doi.org/10.20318/eunomia.2020.5262.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Roman law. Vis major (Civil law)"
Nwafor, Ndubuisi Augustine. "Comparative and critical analysis of the doctrine of exemption/frustration/force majeure under the United Nations Convention on the Contract for International Sale of Goods, English law and UNIDROIT principles." Thesis, University of Stirling, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/1893/21805.
Full textBooks on the topic "Roman law. Vis major (Civil law)"
Von der vis maior zur höheren Gewalt: Geschichte und Dogmatik eines haftungsentlastenden Begriffs. P. Lang, 1989.
Find full textGuarido, Natalia del Olmo. El caso fortuito: Su incidencia en la ejecución de las obligaciones : doctrina y jurisprudencia. Aranzadi, 2004.
Find full textDunné, J. M. van. "Acts of God", overmacht en onvoorziene omstandigheden in het bouwrecht. Kluwer, 1998.
Find full textGianfelici, Mario César. Caso fortuito y caso de fuerza mayor : en el sistema de responsabilidad civil. Abeledo-Perrot, 1995.
Find full textGoedmakers, A. J. Overmacht bij overeenkomst en onrechtmatige daad =: Force majeure en matière de la responsabilité contractuelle et délictuelle en droit néerlandais et français : une comparaison. Gouda Quint, 1998.
Find full textFernandes, Luís A. Carvalho. A teoria da imprevisão no direito civil português. Quid Juris, 2001.
Find full textLarrañaga, Nelson. La fuerza mayor en el derecho del trabajo. Fundación de Cultura Universitaria, 1991.
Find full textVoidey, Nadège. Le risque en droit civil. Presses universitaires d'Aix-Marseille, 2005.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Roman law. Vis major (Civil law)"
Epstein, Richard A. "One Step at a Time in Roman Law." In Roman Law and Economics. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198787211.003.0020.
Full textSorkin, David. "Civil Rights in Western Europe." In Jewish Emancipation. Princeton University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691164946.003.0006.
Full text"Southern Water Authority v Pegrum and Pegrum [1989] Crim LR 442 (DC) Facts: The respondents were charged with an offence contrary to s 31(1) of the Control of Pollution Act 1974, causing polluting matter (pig effluent) to enter a stream. The respondents reared pigs; effluent produced by the pigs was held initially in tanks and then transferred by gravity into a lagoon constructed for the purpose. The lagoon itself was emptied of liquid content for use as manure several times a year and of sediment annually. In the winter of 1987, after heavy rain, a blocked drain resulted in rain water flowing into the lagoon. A fissure developed at the top of one side of the lagoon and polluting liquid escaped, finding its way into a stream and eventually into a river. The magistrates found that the overflow from the lagoon was caused by an act of God – the ingress of rainwater – and that it was unnecessary to consider whether the respondents were negligent either in not inspecting the drain or discovering the overflow promptly enough or in not providing an adequate drain. They further found that the blocked drain causing the ingress of rainwater was an intervening event ‘breaking the chain of causation’. They dismissed the information and the prosecutor appealed by way of case stated. Held, allowing the appeal and remitting the case with a direction to convict, the following principles applied: (1) where the defendant conducts some active operation involving the storage, use or creation of material capable of polluting a river should it escape, then if it does escape and pollute, the defendant is liable if he ‘caused’ that escape; (2) the question of causation is to be decided in a common sense way; (3) a defendant may be found to have caused that escape even though he did not intend that escape and even though the escape happened without his negligence; (4) it is a defence to show that the cause of the escape was the intervening act of a third party or act of God or vis major which are the novus actus interveniens defences to strict civil liability referred to in Rylands v Fletcher (1868) LR 3 HL 330; (5) in deciding whether the intervening cause affords a defence the test is whether it was of so powerful nature that the conduct of the defendant was not a cause at all, but was merely part of the surrounding circumstances. On the facts of the present case, the active operations or positive acts of the respondents were the storage and re-use of the effluent which resulted in the formation of the toxic sediment which polluted the stream. The magistrates erred in finding that the ingress of rainwater was an act of God; an act of God is an operation of natural forces so unpredictable as to excuse a defendant all liability for its consequences. The quantity of rain could not properly be regarded in itself as an act of God and in any event the ingress of rainwater into the lagoon was the result of the overflow from the blocked drain. Although unpredictable and unforeseeable operation of animate forces can amount to an act of God (see Carstairs v Taylor (1870) LR 6 Exch 217), there was no factual basis for such finding in the present case. The respondents submitted that the blocked drain was an effective intervening cause relegating the respondent’s effluent operation to a mere surrounding circumstance; it was sought to distinguish Alphacell Ltd v Woodward [1972] AC 824 on the basis that in." In Sourcebook Criminal Law. Routledge-Cavendish, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781843143093-71.
Full text