Academic literature on the topic 'Romans 1:26-27'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Romans 1:26-27.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Romans 1:26-27"

1

de Bruyn, Theodore. "Ambrosiaster’s Interpretations of Romans 1:26-27." Vigiliae Christianae 65, no. 5 (2011): 463–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157007211x561635.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract Scholarly discussions of patristic interpretations of Romans 1:26-27 have overlooked the fact that Ambrosiaster revised his reading of the passage. In the first version of his commentary on Romans, Ambrosiaster understands verse 26 to refer to “unnatural” sexual relations between women and men, whereas in the second and third versions he understands the verse to refer to “unnatural” sexual relations between women. The paper examines the differences between the three versions, explains Ambrosiaster’s remarks, and situates his interpretation within the moral outlook and exegetical tradition of Latin Christian writers.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Nolland, John. "Romans 1:26-27 and the Homosexuality Debate." Horizons in Biblical Theology 22, no. 1 (2000): 32–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/187122000x00036.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Ward, Roy Bowen. "Why Unnatural? The Tradition behind Romans 1:26–27." Harvard Theological Review 90, no. 3 (July 1997): 263–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0017816000006349.

Full text
Abstract:
In his discussion of Romans 1:26–27, Robin Scroggs raised two important questions which have been the subject of much debate since the publication of his 1983 book. One is the question of why this passage mentions women at all in its remarks concerning same-sex acts. Scroggs commented:Since there are no Old Testament laws prohibiting female homosexuality, why does Paul include it here? If Paul is dependent on a preformed tradition for these two verses, he of course found it in that tradition. Why the tradition included it is a question to which I see no answer.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Smith, M. D. "Ancient Bisexuality and the Interpretation of Romans 1:26-27." Journal of the American Academy of Religion LXIV, no. 2 (January 1, 1996): 223–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lxiv.2.223.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Banister. "Ὁμοίως and the Use of Parallelism in Romans 1:26-27." Journal of Biblical Literature 128, no. 3 (2009): 569. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/25610204.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Botha, Peet H., and Fika J. van Rensburg. "Homosexuality as “Against Nature”: An Interpretation of Romans 1:26–27." Acta Patristica et Byzantina 15, no. 1 (January 2004): 38–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10226486.2004.11745734.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Davies, Margaret. "New Testament Ethics and Ours: Homosexuality and Sexuality in Romans 1:26-27." Biblical Interpretation 3, no. 3 (1995): 315–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156851595x00168.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThe article contains one major argument and one minor argument. The major argument is that Paul's strictures against homosexual practice were taken over from Leviticus and expressed a concern of Hellenistic Judaism. The Pauline subversion of the web of relations which make sense of the exclusion of homosexual practice within the Jewish tradition, however, leaves the Pauline strictures without warrant. The minor argument is that we in the twentieth century should subvert the Pauline assumption of difference between males and females, again adopted from the Jewish tradition, and that we should recognize a continuum and variety. Such a subversion would allow us to see ourselves primarily as people rather than primarily as either men or women.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Dodson, Joseph R. "The Fall of Men and the Lust of Women in Seneca’s Epistle 95 and Paul’s Letter to the Romans." Novum Testamentum 59, no. 4 (September 20, 2017): 355–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15685365-12341581.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract Seneca’s invective against the sexual misconduct in the Roman Empire as part of his decline narrative is a neglected parallel to Rom 1:26-27. Its resonances, however, give more support to Ben Witherington’s comment about specifically situating Romans 1 within the context of Seneca’s castigation of the lechery in Rome. Moreover, the parallels with Epistle 95 reinforce an excessive lust view of Rom 1:26-27.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Townsley, J. "Queer Sects in Patristic Commentaries on Romans 1:26-27: Goddess Cults, Free Will, and "Sex Contrary to Nature"?" Journal of the American Academy of Religion 81, no. 1 (November 19, 2012): 56–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfs086.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Larsson, Edvin. "Paul: Law and Salvation." New Testament Studies 31, no. 3 (July 1985): 425–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0028688500013953.

Full text
Abstract:
From F. Chr. Baur and onwards, New Testament scholarship has laid strong emphasis on the difference between the Paul of the letters and the Paul of Acts. A few examples will suffice to illustrate this approach. The real Paul, the Paul of the letters, claims to be an apostle. In Acts he is depicted as subordinate to the Twelve, for whom the title apostle is reserved. In Galatians and Romans Paul takes up a strongly polemical attitude to the Jewish torah and to circumcision. The Paul of Acts circumcizes Timothy (16. 3). And he declares his solidarity with the law, the prophets and the people of Israel (23. 6; 24. 14 f.; 26. 6, 23; 28. 21). In his epistles Paul strongly emphasizes the significance of the death of Christ. He proclaims its atoning effect for all mankind (Rom 3. 24 ff.; 5. 6 ff. 1 Cor 1. 18 ff.; 15. 3; 2 Cor 5. 18 ff.; Gal 3. 13). The author of Acts seems to regard the suffering and death of Jesus, the servant of God, almost as a test, which he had to undergo before ‘entering upon his glory’. To be sure, the death of Christ is also by Luke described as the act through which he won the church for himself (20. 28). And the missionary message in Acts contains the statement that he died according to the Scriptures (3. 18; 13. 27–29). It is, nevertheless, obvious that the death of Christ does not receive the same comprehensive interpretation in Acts as in the Pauline epistles.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Romans 1:26-27"

1

Reeser, Chad Eric. "Homosexuality in Romans 1:26-27 a response to the revisionist's approach to "against nature" /." Theological Research Exchange Network (TREN), 2008. http://www.tren.com/search.cfm?p001-1229.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Botha, Petrus Hendrik. "The Apostle Paul and homosexuality : a socio-historical study / Petrus Hendrik Botha." Thesis, North-West University, 2004. http://hdl.handle.net/10394/81.

Full text
Abstract:
Like many other people I have thought about the biblical understanding of homosexuality. Because of my previous study on sexual purity before marriage and the exegetical work done on key biblical passages for that study, I thought I understood where the real issues lay regarding the subject of homosexuality. This study is an attempt to contribute to the current discussion in the Dutch Reformed Church in South Africa on the topic of homosexuality. In bringing this study to its final format I have received the indispensable help of others. First and foremost I wish to express my gratitude to my promoter, Professor Fika J van Rensburg. I am indebted to him beyond what mere words could convey in terms of gratitude. Our academic relationship spans five years and has developed into a warm friendship. It has been to my matchless benefit to be associated with him. I have profited much from his biblical knowledge, scholarly experience and overall passion and love for the Lord Jesus Christ. I also want to thank Reverend Erlo Stegen of Mission Kwasizabantu for his support and spiritual guidance. It is very special to be associated with a person who preaches the Word of God unambiguously and who has given and dedicated his life to Christ and Christ alone. Through his dedication Mission Kwasizabantu had become a home to the spiritual homeless and a refuge for the spiritual weary. The Mission has also been my home since 1994. I would like to express appreciation to Dr Andre van Niekerk and the North-West University for the financial support to complete this study. It is my prayer that the critical reader of this thesis will acknowledge that the money was well invested. I also wish to express my sincere gratitude to my friend, Reverend Frits van der Menve, for proofreading the manuscript. A special word of thanks to the personnel of the Ferdinand Postma and Jan Lion Cachet Libraries for their help and assistance. All my requests were always met with a smile and helpful attitude. All work done for me was executed in a spirit of kindness and benevolence. Lastly, I would like to thank my wife Andra and my son Chris, whose lives are inextricably bound with my own and who shared in the sacrifices associated with this study.
Thesis (Ph.D. (New Testament))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2004.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Edgington, Brad. "Possible echoes and reverberations : Paul's disapproval of homoeroticism in context: Romans 1:26-27." Thesis, 2002. http://hdl.handle.net/2429/12027.

Full text
Abstract:
A heated contemporary debate interminably swirls around two verses (1:26-27) in Paul's letter to the Romans. This debate is about whether or not Paul is condemning what we understand today as homosexuality. In order to enter into this debate, one must first endeavour to understand Paul's words within their original context. By using the historical-critical method, this study attempts to capture the (plain) sense of the verses in question within their original context. First, the paper explores and critically analyzes a wide range of sources that reveal the attitudes toward same-sex relations in both the ancient Greco-Roman tradition and the Jewish tradition. Both these cultures had a strong influence and Paul's choice of words and thought patterns. Next, the investigation moves forward to analyze aspects of Romans 1:26-27 and the larger context in which this passage is contained. The following thesis is put forth: although Romans 1:26-27 appropriates the conventional language of the Greco-Roman tradition, especially in its reference to "nature" (physis), Paul's opposition to homoeroticism is informed by a Hellenistic-Jewish worldview that is influenced by the priestly texts of the Torah and Greco-Roman philosophy. Together, these influences propel Paul to condemn all homoerotic acts because they run counter to God's intended order for humankind.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Romans 1:26-27"

1

Sherlock, Peta. "Reading Romans as Anglicans Romans 1:26–27." In Five Uneasy Pieces, 31–46. ATF Press, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt163t97h.8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Provance, Brett. "Romans 1:26–27 in Its Rhetorical Tradition." In Greco-Roman and Jewish Tributaries to the New Testament, 83–116. Claremont Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvwrm4f2.11.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

"Can One Be Critical without Being Autobiographical? The Case of Romans 1:26-27." In Autobiographical Biblical Criticism, 34–59. BRILL, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004397514_006.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

"Commentary on Book IV." In De Civitate Dei Books III and IV, edited by P. G. Walsh, 219–46. Liverpool University Press, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.3828/liverpool/9780856687594.003.0005.

Full text
Abstract:
After recapitulation of the topics of the previous three books (1–2), Augustine discusses the morality of military conquest (3–6), the gods to whom Roman successes are ascribed (7– 13), the prominence of abstract deities (14–26), attitudes of Roman intellectuals (27–32), and the ordinance of the true God (33–34)....
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography