Academic literature on the topic 'Russo-Polish War'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Russo-Polish War.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Russo-Polish War"

1

Bury, Jan. "POLISH CODEBREAKING DURING THE RUSSO-POLISH WAR OF 1919–1920." Cryptologia 28, no. 3 (2004): 193–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0161-110491892872.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Chiharu, Inaba. "Polish‐Japanese military collaboration during the Russo‐Japanese war." Japan Forum 4, no. 2 (1992): 229–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09555809208721459.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Papakin, A. "REVENGE OF THE RUSSIAN HISTORIOGRAPHY: KANIV 1662 REVIEW OF THE BOOK: Babulin, I. B. (2015) Kaniv Battle of 16 July 1662. Moscow: Fond "Russkie Vitiazi"." Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. History, no. 132 (2017): 83–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.17721/1728-2640.2017.132.1.17.

Full text
Abstract:
We review a monograph published in 2015 in Moscow by Igor Babulin. It deals with an episode of the Russo-Polish War of 1654–1667, held in Ukraine during the Ruin in the times of Hetman Yuri Khmelnitsky. The reviewed publication contains a number of controversial statements, which are analyzed in this review. Attention is drawn to the politicization of the author and his distorted assessment of past events. It's important to bring under question the author's position on the battle between Moscow State and the Cossack army, led by Yuri Khmelnitsky, in Kaniv in 1662 as the biggest victory in the Russo-Polish War of 1654–1667. We analyze the reasons of exaggerating the importance of the victory of Russian troops in Kaniv in 1662.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

CROWLEY, DAVID. "Seeing Japan, Imagining Poland: Polish Art and the Russo-Japanese War." Russian Review 67, no. 1 (2008): 50–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9434.2007.00473.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Kimla, Piotr. "George F. Kennan a „sprawa polska” u schyłku II wojny światowej." Studia nad Autorytaryzmem i Totalitaryzmem 39, no. 2 (2017): 95–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.19195/2300-7249.39.2.6.

Full text
Abstract:
GEORGE F. KENNAN AND THE “POLISH CAUSE” AT THE END OF WORLD WAR IIThe article aims at explaining why the famous American diplomatist and intriguing political thinker George F. Kennan already in 1944 considered “the Polish cause” as the “all alost cause” and did not believe in the possibility of restitution of Poland as an independent country after World War II. According to Kennan, this was determined primarily by the Russo-German Nonaggression Pact signed in August 1939. Strictly speaking, by the crimes committed on the Polish population by the Soviet police authorities in 1939–1941. Another important factor was the general expansionist nature of the Soviet regime. Even the Warsaw uprising filled with the unprecedented heroism could not change anything in Stalin’s policy towards Poland.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Airapetov, O. R. "1829–1839: Russia's Foreign Policy on the Eve of the 1839 Events." Orthodoxia, no. 3 (May 22, 2024): 80–121. http://dx.doi.org/10.53822/2712-9276-2024-3-80-121.

Full text
Abstract:
The resolution of the Uniate schism marked a pivotal moment in Emperor Nicholas I's reign. Initially, there were no indications or plans for substantial changes in policies regarding the Empire's western territories. Petersburg adhered to the tradition of dialogue with the first estate, while Nicholas upheld his predecessor's stance towards the Kingdom of Poland. Viewing the Constitution of 1815 as part of his heritage, Nicholas assumed the title of King of Congress Poland and displayed considerable generosity towards his Polish subjects. Russo-BritishFrench collaboration on the Eastern question, particularly in addressing the pressing Greek issue, created favorable external political circumstances for Petersburg before the Russo-Turkish War of 1828–1829. This period seemingly marked the end of the monarchical solidarity of the Holy Alliance and preserved the status quo of the Vienna System. However, the revolutionary events of 1830 precipitated significant changes. The demise of the Bourbons severed the possibility of allied or partnership relations with Paris for the foreseeable future. Following the deposition of the Romanovs, sanctioned by the Sejm of rebels in January 1831, the Russo-Polish conflict erupted, resulting in the further dissolution of Polish statehood. Consequently, Emperor’s trust in the Polish nobility waned. The first Egyptian crisis of 1833 reignited tensions among European powers, and by 1836, relations between Petersburg and London teetered on the brink of war for the first time in years. The second Turkish-Egyptian crisis of 1839–1840 once again altered the diplomatical landscape. France, the most ardent supporter of the Poles after 1831, found itself isolated. Austria, as the second Catholic State, aligned itself with Russia. As for Great Britain, the religious policy of London, while supporting the Papal State in Italy, was quite distant from supporting Catholicism in their own territories, especially in Ireland. All these factors created favorable conditions for the reform of 1839.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Lašas, Ainius. "When History Matters: Baltic and Polish Reactions to the Russo-Georgian War." Europe-Asia Studies 64, no. 6 (2012): 1061–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2012.691724.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Petelin, Boris Valentinovich, and Vladilena Vadimovna Vorobeva. "World War II in modern interpretations of Russian and Polish politicians." Vestnik of Kostroma State University 27, no. 2 (2021): 82–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.34216/1998-0817-2021-27-2-82-90.

Full text
Abstract:
In the political circles of European countries attempts to reformat the history of World War II has been continuing. Poland is particularly active; there at the official level, as well as in the articles and in the speeches of politicians, political scientists and historians crude attacks against Russia for its commitment to objective assessments of the military past are allowed. Though, as the authors of this article mention, Russian politicians have not always been consistent in evaluation of Soviet-Polish relationships, hoping to reach a certain compromise. If there were any objections, they were mostly unconvincing. Obviously, as the article points, some statements and speeches are not without emotional colouring that is characteristic, when expressing mutual claims. However, the deliberate falsification of historical facts and evidence, from whatever side it occurs, does not meet the interests of the Polish and Russian peoples, in whose memory the heroes of the Red Army and the Polish Resistance have lived and will live. The authors point in the conclusions that it is hard to achieve mutual respect to key problems of World War II because of the overlay of the 18th – 19th centuries, connected with the “partitions of Poland”, the existence of the “Kingdom of Poland” as part of the Russian Empire, Soviet-Polish War of 1920. There can be only one way out, as many Russian and Polish scientists believe – to understand the complex twists and turns of Russo-Polish history, relying on the documents. Otherwise, the number of pseudoscientific, dishonest interpretations will grow.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Pałasz-Rutkowska, Ewa. "Poland and Japan ‒ the impact of the Cold War on bilateral relations." Prace Historyczne 147, no. 3 (2020): 619–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.4467/20844069ph.20.033.12487.

Full text
Abstract:
Bilateral relations between Poland and Japan were generally friendly since the Russo-Japanese War (1904–1905), throughout the entire interwar era, after the government of Japan recognized independent Poland after WWI (on 6 March 1919), and even during WWII. What was seen as important was a mutual support on the international arena during international conflicts (such as those in Upper Silesia, Manchuria, etc.) and especially military and espionage cooperation. How did the Cold War influence Polish-Japanese relations? Did the relations, which were until that time friendly, play a role in this period – a time of trouble for the entire world? The author tries to answer these questions, relying on selected and important events and issues from the period of the Cold War (until 1989).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Korotkov, Vasilii Olegovich. "Commanders of foreign order regiments in 1654: peculiarities of formation of the Russian officer corps." Исторический журнал: научные исследования, no. 4 (April 2021): 40–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.7256/2454-0609.2021.4.36230.

Full text
Abstract:
The subject of this research is the formation of the higher command personnel of the foreign order regiments in 1654. The article examines the details of the biographies of 37 commanders of the foreign order regiments that existed by the beginning of the Russo-Polish War of 1654–1667, namely their origin in Russia, foreign service experience, production in the ranks, ethnic composition, attitude towards Orthodoxy, army allocation in the campaign of 1654, and share of troops they led in the chief armies. The work is based on the wide array of documentary materials of IInozemsky Prikaz (Office for the Affairs of the Foreigners) and Posolsky Prikaz (Ambassadorial Office); some of the materials are newly introduced to the scientific discourse. This article is first to explore the biographies of majority of commanders of foreign order regiments in 1654. Analysis is conducted on their origin, production in the Russian prior to the Russo-Polish War, participation in the campaign of 1654, ethnic composition, confession; classification is offered based on the service experience in Western European countries. The analysis of officer “services” acknowledges that the foreign order regiments in the chief armies were led by the most competent newcomer foreigners with the Western European military experience. The young Russian officers service led by the experienced foreigners became a pivotal stage in the formation of the national officer corps.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Russo-Polish War"

1

Ruskoski, David T. "The Polish Army in France immigrants in America, World War I volunteers in France, defenders of the recreated state in Poland /." unrestricted, 2006. http://etd.gsu.edu/theses/available/etd-07172006-145252/.

Full text
Abstract:
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Georgia State University, 2006.<br>Title from title screen. Christine M. Skwiot, Gerald H. Davis, committee co-chairs; Hugh H. Hudson, committee member. Electronic text (184 p. : ill. (some col.), col. maps) : digital, PDF file. Description based on contents viewed June 13, 2007. Includes bibliographical references (p.175-184).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Malarenko, Henady. "Isaak Bábel e o seu Diário de Guerra de 1920." Universidade de São Paulo, 2011. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/8/8155/tde-11102011-133125/.

Full text
Abstract:
O Diário escrito por Isaak Bábel, durante sua participação na guerra russo-polonesa de 1920, serviu de base para a sua obra mais importante Konármia ou O Exército de Cavalaria. A existência desse material permite entrever os bastidores da técnica criativa de um dos grandes mestres do conto russo do século XX, conforme foi visto na análise de alguns trechos do Diário, comparados com os de Konármia. No entanto, o Diário de 1920, de per si, não deixa de representar, hoje, uma obra com marcantes características literárias. Assim, o nosso objetivo foi, inicialmente, fazer uma tradução direta do Diário de Bábel, do russo para o português. A seguir, ao lado de sua breve biografia, uma análise e uma discussão de sua maneira de construir o que hoje é considerada uma obra literária.<br>The Diary written by Isaak Babel, during his participation in the Russian-Polish war of 1920, was the basis for his most important work Konarmia also called The Red Cavalry. The existence of this material allows us to foresee the backstage of the creative technique of one of the great Russian short story masters of the XX century, as we saw analysing some parts of the Diary and comparing them to the short stories of Konarmia. However, the 1920 Diary, is considered today by itself a literary work, with relevant artistic characteristics. Therefore, our goal was initially the direct translation of the Diary from Russian into Portuguese. Afterwords, beside his short biography, an analysis and discussion of his method of constructing the Diary as a literary piece.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Liška, Jan. "Zánik polsko-litevského státu 1791-1795." Master's thesis, 2018. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-388922.

Full text
Abstract:
This thesis aims to analyze the events that led in the years 1791-1795 to the gradual decline of the Polish-Lithuanian state. The year 1791 was chosen as a starting point for the reason that it was during this year that the so-called Great Sejm adopted the Constitution of 3 May, considered a last attempt to reform the dysfunctional constitutional system that paralysed the political life of the Commonwealth, crippled its ability to defend itself and made it a marionette in the hands of powerful neighbours, especially Prussia and Russia. The thesis concentrates on the ambiguous role played in this period by the last king Stanisław II August. It also focuses on the opposition against the constitutional changes, associated in the so-called Targowica Confederation, the ensuing Russo-Polish War of 1792, the Second Partition of Poland, Kościuszko Uprising and the final Third Partition of 1795 - all these events are discussed in the wider context of European politics. The author makes use of sources and secondary literature in Polish, Russian, German, English and French.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Russo-Polish War"

1

Malov, A. V. Russko-pol £skai Ła voi na 1654-1667 gg. T ŁSei khgauz, 2006.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Neiberg, Michael S. The Eastern Front 1914-1920: From Tannenberg to the Russo-Polish war. Amber Books, 2012.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Neiberg, Michael S. The Eastern Front 1914-1920: From Tannenberg to the Russo-Polish war. Amber Books, 2008.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Cisek, Janusz. American reports on the Polish-Bolshevik War 1919-1920. Wojskowe Centrum Edukacji Obywatelskiej, 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Wolański, Adam. Wojna polsko-rosyjska 1792 r. Oficyna Wydawnicza Volumen, 1996.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Bobiatynski, Konrad. Od Smolenska do Wilna: Wojna Rzeczypospolitej z Moskwa 1654-1655. Wydawnictwo Inforteditions, 2004.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Derdej, Piotr. Zieleńce--Mir--Dubienka 1792. Bellona, 2000.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Klimecki, Michał. Czas próby: Wojna polsko-sowiecka 1919-1920 r. Vipart, 2000.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Poltorak, S. N. Pobedonosnoe porazhenie: Razmyshlenii͡a︡ o sovetsko-polʹskoĭ voĭne 1920 goda v kanun ee 75-letii͡a︡. TOO "Tert͡s︡ii͡a︡, 1994.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Martin, Ros. Een vergeten oorlog: Polen-Rusland 1920. Aspekt, 2003.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Russo-Polish War"

1

Ponichtera, Robert M., and David R. Stone. "The Russo-Polish War." In The Military History of the Soviet Union. Palgrave Macmillan US, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-12029-8_3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Ponichtera, Robert M., and David R. Stone. "The Russo-Polish War." In The Military History of the Soviet Union. Palgrave Macmillan US, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230108219_3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

"THE RUSSO-POLISH WAR 1920." In The Routledge Atlas of Russian History. Routledge, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203074473-96.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Kashirin, Vasili B. "«A correct description of the bygone war»: previously unknown strategic memorandum by the General en chef, Count Petr Panin and the unraveled mystery of authorship of the anonymous memoirs about the Russo-Turkish War of 1736–1739." In Russia: A Look at the Balkans. Eighteenth - Nineteenth Centuries. On the 100th anniversary of Irina S. Dostyan's. Institute of Slavic Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.31168/2618-8570.2021.03.

Full text
Abstract:
The article for the first time introduces into scientific circulation a valuable historical document ― the second part of the well-known memoir of a participant in the Russo-Turkish war of 1736–1739 under the title “Zapiska o tom skol’ko ya pamiatuyu o krymskih I turetskih pohodah” (“A note about how much I remember about the Crimean and Turkish campaigns”). The second part of the document discovered in the archive is a generalisation of the military experience of fightings against the Turkish and Tatar troops, and contains specific proposals for the operations of the Russian army at the beginning of the Russo-Turkish war of 1768–1774. This discovery made it possible to prove that the author of both parts of the document is an outstanding military figure, General en Chef, Count Petr Panin (1720–1789). The article proves that the document was drawn up by him at the end of 1768 to reinforce Panin's position in developing military strategy of the Russian Empire in the fight against Turkey. As the analysis of the document shows, Panin was a supporter of active offensive actions in the Dniester theatre of war, in particular, the preventive occupation of Polish fortresses in that area. Among other things, the established authorship of the document sheds light on the early stage of Petr Panin's military career and the circumstances of his participation in the Russo-Turkish war of 1736–1739. The full text of the document is published in the appendix to the article for the first time.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Smallman-Raynor, Matthew, and Andrew Cliff. "Wars and War Epidemics." In War Epidemics. Oxford University Press, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198233640.003.0010.

Full text
Abstract:
Disease is a head of the Hydra, War. In his classic book, The Epidemics of the Middle Ages, J. F. C. Hecker (1859) paints an apocalyptic picture of the war–disease association. For Hecker, infectious diseases, the ‘unfettered powers of nature . . . inscrutable in their dominion, destructive in their effects, stay the course of events, baffle the grandest plans, paralyse the boldest flights of the mind, and when victory seemed within their grasp, have often annihilated embattled hosts with the flaming sword of the angel of death’ (Hecker, 1859: 212). The theme is developed by August Hirsch who, in the second edition of his Handbook of Geographical and Historical Pathology (1883), was repeatedly moved to comment on the manner in which wars fuelled the spread of infectious diseases. Writing of Asiatic cholera in the Baltic provinces and Poland in 1830–1, Hirsch concluded that the ‘military operations of the Russo-Polish war contributed materially to its diffusion’ (i. 398). Similarly, Hirsch traced one of the last ‘considerable’ outbreaks of bubonic plague in nineteenth-century Europe to ‘1828–29, when the Russian and Turkish forces came into collision in Wallachia’ (i. 503–4), while the waves of typhus fever that rolled around early-modern Europe were attributed to ‘the turmoil of great wars, which . . . shook the whole framework of European society to its foundations’ (i. 549). In much earlier times, Book I of Homer’s epic poem the Iliad—which may well be based on historical fact—tells of a mysterious epidemic that smote the camp of the Greek Army outside Troy around 1200 BC. According to Homer, the fate of King Agamemnon’s legions was sealed thus: . . . Say then, what God the fatal strife provoked? Jove’s and Latona’s son; he filled with wrath Against the King, with deadly pestilence The camp afflicted,—and the people died,— For Chryses’ sake . . . . . . Elsewhere, the celebrated works of ancient Greek historians—Herodotus (?484–?425 BC) on the later Assyrian Wars, Thucydides (?460–?395 BC) on the Great Peloponnesian War and Diodorus Siculus ( fl. first century BC) on the Carthaginian Wars—all attest to the antiquity of the war–disease association. Of ancient Rome, Bruce-Chwatt notes that ‘Foreign invaders . . . found that the deadly fevers of the Compagna Romana protected the Eternal City better than any man-made weapons’ (cited in Beadle and Hoffman, 1993: 320).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Wight, Martin, and DAVID S. YOST. "Review of Charles Petrie, Diplomatic History 1713–1933 (London: Hollis & Carter, 1946)." In History and International Relations. Oxford University PressOxford, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192867476.003.0020.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract Petrie composed, Wight observed, “an international history that falls into two contrasted sections. The first is interesting and useful, the second is the reverse.… The survey of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, which makes the bulk of the book, is skilful and lucid.… It is in the final chapters that the book goes to pieces.… The politics of the Central Powers, the Polish Question, Ludendorff’s diplomacy which was to Hitler’s what Louis XIV’s was to Napoleon’s, the defeat of Russia, are ignored altogether.… It contains no mention of the League of Nations as a new departure in diplomacy. It omits the Washington Conference of 1921–2 and the post-war settlement in the Pacific. It ignores Mussolini’s seizure of power, and the Corfu incident.… It assumes, without describing or explaining, the break-up of the Hapsburg and Russian Empires and the establishment of the Succession States;… it mentions neither Allied intervention in Russia, nor the Russo-Polish War, nor the Little Entente.… Sir Charles deplores a Europocentric view of international relations.… but in the final chapter, covering 1923 to 1933, he is once more culpable. His picture is Western Europe, and Locarno is the centre-piece. The Far East, the Civil War in China, is again ignored.… The curtain falls upon Hitler’s accession to power, without the Japanese conquest of Manchuria having been mentioned.”
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography