Academic literature on the topic 'Russo-Turkish Relations'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Russo-Turkish Relations.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Russo-Turkish Relations"

1

Troulis, Markos. "Beyond the Gas Trade: The Structural Determinants of Russo-Turkish Relations." İnsan & Toplum Dergisi (The Journal of Human & Society) 5, no. 10 (2015): 113–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.12658/human.society.5.10.m0140.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Frolova, Marina. "Two-star general I.V. Gourko's Advanced detachment and the Bulgarians in the summer of 1877 (as remembered by the Russo-Turkish War of 1877-1878 participants)." Slavs and Russia, no. 2019 (2019): 198–239. http://dx.doi.org/10.31168/2618-8570.2019.8.

Full text
Abstract:
The article is based on the significant number of published sources, foremost the memoirs of the Russo-Turkish War of 1877-1878 participants. It is written in the form of imagology and considers relations between the soldiers and officers of the two-star general I.V. Gourko's Advanced detachment and the Bulgarians as well as recreates a multidimensional picture of these contacts.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Manakhova, Angelina V. "Revisiting the Awarding of Correspondents of the Russo-Turkish War of 1877-1878." Herald of an archivist, no. 2 (2019): 439–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.28995/2073-0101-2019-2-439-448.

Full text
Abstract:
The article is devoted to a brief analysis of the previously unknown archival file “On awarding of former newspaper correspondent Rose and Colonel Brukenberry.” It refers to military reporters William Kinnaird Rose and Charles Brackenbury who accompanied the army of the Russian Empire in the Russo-Turkish war of 1877-1878. William Rose represented provincial press of Great Britain; he wrote for the Scottish newspaper “The Scotsman.” Charles Brackenbury, Colonel of the British army, was absent with leave during the campaign; his reports were published in “The Times.” The file “On awarding of fo
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Gokov, O. A. "Russia, Iran, and the 'Eastern Question' in the 1850s–1870s (Россия, Иран и «Восточный вопрос» в 1850-х–1870-х гг.)". Canadian-American Slavic Studies 50, № 2 (2016): 177–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22102396-05002006.

Full text
Abstract:
This article examines Russian-Iranian relations in the context of the “Eastern Question” in the years 1850–1870. During the Crimean War (1853–1856) and the Russo-Turkish War of 1877–1878, each side tried to exploit the other to their own advantage, though in general relations in the first half of the nineteenth century saw both countries finding good cause to cooperate with each other on issues of comment interest in the region. This article, however, identifies a sharp reduction in the role of Iran in the “Eastern Question” in the second half of the century as compared to the first half of th
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Atanasova (Marcheva), Iliyana. "Celebration the 140th anniversary of the Russo-Turkish liberation war of 1877-1878 in the context of Bulgaria-Russia relations 2007-2018." Slavs and Russia, no. 2019 (2019): 403–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.31168/2618-8570.2019.18.

Full text
Abstract:
Considering anniversaries as part of the so-called «politics of memory» executed by the state which in fact is a tool used to construct Bulgarian identity, the author analyses three celebrations, i.e. the 130th (2008), the 135th (2013) and the 140th (2018) anniversaries of the end of the Russo-Turkish war of 1877-1878 that took place in Bulgaria in the form of national events. The article shows gradual formation of the offi cial interpretation of ‘March 3rd' that proceeded from 1991 to 2018 as well as attitudes of historians and expert discussions' contents. Special attention is paid to the thr
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Statiev, Alexander. "The Thorns of the Wild Rose: Russian Ordeals at the Shipka Pass During the Russo-Turkish War of 1877–1878." Journal of Slavic Military Studies 32, no. 3 (2019): 367–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13518046.2019.1646907.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Neuburger, Mary. "The Russo‐Turkish war and the ‘Eastern Jewish question’: Encounters between victims and victors in Ottoman Bulgaria, 1877–8." East European Jewish Affairs 26, no. 2 (1996): 53–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13501679608577830.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Statiev, Alexander. "A Hitch on the Path to Glory: The Breakthrough Across the Balkan Ridge During the Russo-Turkish War of 1877–78." Journal of Slavic Military Studies 32, no. 4 (2019): 507–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13518046.2019.1684012.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Acar, Keziban. "An Examination of Russian Imperialism: Russian Military and Intellectual Descriptions of the Caucasians during the Russo-Turkish War of 1877–1878." Nationalities Papers 32, no. 1 (2004): 7–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0090599042000186151.

Full text
Abstract:
In nineteenth-century Russia, the Caucasus was a large region composed of various territories and ethnic and religious groups. This region included Circassia, Mingrelia, Georgia, a part of Armenia, the ancient Media, Daghestan and the territories of Suanctians, Ossetians, Abkhazians, Karakalpaks and other mountaineer nations. During the nineteenth century, Persia, Russia and the Ottoman Empire wanted to establish their influence and power on the Caucasus. Due to this conflict, these powers, especially Russia with Persia and Russia with the Ottoman Empire, fought with each other.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Kuzmicheva, Lyudmila. "Serbia gains independence in 1878. Illusions and reality." Slavs and Russia, no. 2019 (2019): 271–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.31168/2618-8570.2019.11.

Full text
Abstract:
Serbia became an independent state after the Russo-Turkish war of 1877-1878. Relations between the Russian Empire and the Serbian Principality deteriorated on the eve of the signing of the Treaty of Berlin. This was largely due to the personal position of the Serbian Prince Milan. Serbian leadership considered it impossible to support Russia in the event of a new war. For the Russian side, the unwillingness of the Serbian side to follow Russia's recommendations was unexpected. Serbian historiography has long argued that this position of Serbia was due to the infringement of Serbian national in
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Russo-Turkish Relations"

1

Pospíšil, Tomáš. "Tatarstán mezi Moskvou a Ankarou: analýza postojů elit Tatarstánu k měnícím se vztahům mezi Tureckem a Ruskou federací." Master's thesis, 2017. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-365538.

Full text
Abstract:
The Master thesis is dealing with the external policies of the Republic of Tatarstan, a unit of the Russian Federation, and its relations to Turkey, a nation Tatarstan has cultural ties to, in light of the Russo-Turkish conflict following the shooting down of the Russian fighter jet Su-24 by the Turkish army. To answer questions about the influence of national diplomacy over a region's paradiplomacy, and the possibility to conduct independent paradiplomacy in an authoritarian state, speeches given on topics related to Turkey by the President of Tatarstan Rustam Minnikhanov were analysed agains
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Russo-Turkish Relations"

1

Danchenko, S. I. (Svetlana Ivanovna), Karasev A. V, and Institut slavi︠a︡novedenii︠a︡ (Rossiĭskai︠a︡ akademii︠a︡ nauk), eds. Pervoe serbskoe vosstanie i Rossii︠a︡ vo vremi︠a︡ russko-turet︠s︡koĭ voĭny, 1806-1812 gg. Rossiĭskai︠a︡ akademii︠a︡ nauk, In-t slavi︠a︡novedenii︠a︡, 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Institut slavi︠a︡novedenii︠a︡ (Rossiĭskai︠a︡ akademii︠a︡ nauk), ред. Voĭna, otkryvshai︠a︡ ėpokhu v istorii Balkan: K 180-letii︠u︡ Adrianopolʹskogo mira. URSS, 2009.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi (Ankara, Turkey). Department of History and Meiji Daigaku. Jinbun Kagaku Kenkyūjo, eds. The Ottoman-Russian war of 1877-78. Middle East University, Department of History, Meiji Daigaku, Institute of Humanities, 2007.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Arif, Mehmet. Başımıza gelenler. 4th ed. Adak Yayınları, 1990.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

editor, Yener Emir 1983, ред. Kafkasyaʹda Imparatorluklar Savaşı: Kırımʹa giden yolda Anapa Kalesi, 1781-1801. Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, 2014.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Zapadnai︠a︡ Cherkesii︠a︡ v sisteme vzaimodeĭstvii︠a︡ Rossii s Turt︠s︡ieĭ, Anglieĭ i imamatom Shamili︠a︡ v XIX v. (do 1864 g.). Izd-vo MGTU, 2007.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

editor, Tóth Ferenc 1967, and Center for Ottoman Diplomatic History, eds. La correspondance consulaire de Crimée du baron de Tott (1767-1770). Les Editions Isis, 2014.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Agachi, Alexei. Din istoria Moldovei și Țării Românești sub ocupația rusă (1806-1812). Civitas, 2003.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Lunochkin, A. V. "Ataman volʹnykh kazakov" Nikolaĭ Ashinov i ego dei͡a︡telʹnostʹ. Izd-vo Volgogradskogo gos. universiteta, 2000.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Vladimir, Mischevca, ed. Pacea de la București: Din istoria diplomatică a încheierii tratatului de pace ruso-turc de la 16 (28) mai 1812. Știința, 1993.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Russo-Turkish Relations"

1

Melakopides, Costas. "The Russo-Turkish Labyrinth and the Cyprus-Egypt-Israel-Greece Rapprochement." In Russia-Cyprus Relations. Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137347152_7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Bitis, Alexander. "The Diplomatic Background to the Eastern Question from Its Origins to 1821." In Russia and the Eastern Question. British Academy, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197263273.003.0002.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter gives an overview of the military and diplomatic history of Russo-Turkish relations from their origins to 1815. It outlines the reasons for Russian military ascendancy over its eastern neighbour. It covers the Eastern question in the Balkans, regarding the Russo-Turkish relations from 1810 to 1821; the relations between Russia, Turkey and Persia to 1813; the origins of the ‘weak neighbour’ policy. Political concerns, primarily the fear of the European powers' potentially hostile reaction to a Russian forward policy had frustrated the aims of the army in 1821. This was a precedent destined to characterize much of Russian policy during the Eastern crisis of the 1820s.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Stoilova, Tamara. "Russia, the Porte and the Sultan’s Orthodox subjects after the Treaty of Küçük Kaynarca (1774–1787)." In Slavs and Russia: Problems of Statehood in the Balkans (late XVIII - XXI centuries). Institute of Slavic Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.31168/2618-8570.2020.01.

Full text
Abstract:
The treaty signed on 10/21 July 1774 in Kuchuk-Kainarji forced the Ottoman empire to accept Russia’s peace conditions that expanded its borders to the south and abolished the Turks’ centuries long domination in the Black sea and their absolute control over the Turkish Straits. The treaty enabled offensive policy as a result of which St.Petersburg gained exceptional territorial and strategic positions. The main issues in the relations between the two empires connected with the situation of the sultan’s Orthodox subjects in the interwar period included above all Russia’s right to patronize the Orthodox Christians in the Ottoman Empire and the related amnesty for the participants in the Russo-Turkish war; fulfilment of the provisions enacting restoring of Orthodox churches, Russian support to higher Orthodox clerics as well as construction of a Russian church in Pera. The rights of the Turkish subjects to use Russian merchant flag and to migrate to Russia, still remaining within the sphere of trade relations between the two empires turned out to be a significant and hard to solve problem. The issues concerning St.Petersburg’s policy towards the Danubian Principalities, Montenegro and the Adriatic were still important issues in the Russia-Turkey relations. Most issues in the bilateral relations were a follow-up to the relations during the 1760s and the war of 1768–1774. In the following years the new situation in the Black sea basin, the Turkish Straits opening to merchant vessels under the Russian flag, the Danubian Principalities gradually slipping from Constantinople’s control and of course annexation of the Crimea by the Russian Empire would intensify the crisis in the Russia-Turkey relations and war would become inevitable. But also fatal for the Ottoman Empire.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!