Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Samoyedic languages

Contents

Journal articles
Books
Book chapters
Conference papers

Academic literature on the topic 'Samoyedic languages'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 29 July 2024

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Samoyedic languages.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Samoyedic languages"

1

Tuchkova, N. A. "Review of the dissertation “Reconstruction of the linguistic landscape of Western Siberia (a case study of the Samoyedic languages),” submitted by A. Y. Urmanchieva for the degree of Doctor of Philology." LANGUAGES AND FOLKLORE OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF SIBERIA 49 (2024): 153–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.25205/2312-6337-2024-1-153-160.

Full text

Abstract:

The dissertation “Reconstruction of the linguistic landscape of Western Siberia (a case study of Samoyedic languages)” written by A. Y. Urmanchieva focuses on tracing the Samoyedic group language history. The period under study starts after the collapse of the Proto‒Samoyedic language and ends with the resettlement of the native speakers of Samoyedic languages as recorded in historical documents (16th–18th centuries). The work substantiates the preservation of the links between the Proto-Samoyedic and the Proto-Ob-Ugric languages after their collapse, with separate contacts between the Mansi and South Samoyedic languages. The author confirms the original boundary between the Mansi and Khanty languages, from west to east, and shows that Proto-Mansi was widespread in more southern territories, while Proto-Khanty was prevalent to the north (and not to the east) of the lower Ob basin. Additionally, the author confirms that Matorsky belongs to the Northern Samoyed subgroup. The analysis of separate parallels allowed the author to establish the early contacts between Nganasan, Selkup, and Kamassian and later between Nganasan and common Enets languages. Given these findings, the following successive linguistic landscapes of Western Siberia have been reconstructed. Initially, the migration of the forebears of Samoyedic language speakers moved towards the Ob basin from their original homeland, with a settlement pattern along the Ob tributaries determined by taiga fishing culture. Later, the expansion of the Khants towards the east along the middle Ob River disrupted the previously established pattern, leading to a break in the linguistic continuity of the Samoyed area.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Urmanchieva, Anna. "Is it Necessary to Reconstruct *ö for Proto-Samoyedic: Sources of o after Palatal Consonants in First and Non-First Syllables in Tundra Nenets." Izvestiia Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriia literatury i iazyka 81, no. 6 (2022): 61. http://dx.doi.org/10.31857/s160578800023678-1.

Full text

Abstract:

The article discusses the need to reconstruct the phoneme *ö for the Proto-Samoyed language. As is known, for Proto-Samoyedic (in the system proposed by J. Janhunen in “Samojedischer Wortschatz”) this phoneme is reconstructed only for the first syllable. Its reconstruction relies primarily on the data of the Nenets language: the words of the phonetic structure palatal consonant in anlaut + vowel o, such as syoncya ‘inside’ serve as the base. The article analyzes all cases in which a Nenets word of this type has Proto-Samodic or Proto-Northern Samoyedic etymology. Etymological correlates in other Samoyedic and Northern Samoyedic languages allow to demonstrate, that the initial o palatalizing an anlaut consonant either originates in a more complex phonetic sequence, or is positionally determined and can be explained by the influence of the vowel of the subsequent syllable. Neither for Proto-Samoyedic nor for Proto-Northern Samoyedic are reconstructed words of a “phonetically neutral” structure like *СV, *CVC or even *СVCə̑, *CVCå, where *V is represented by *ö. The etymological correspondences of Nenets words with the sequence palatal consonant + vowel o in non-first syllables are also analyzed: all such words are derivatives, and the material of other Samoyedic languages shows that in this case, too, Nenets o, palatalizing the preceding consonant, does not correspond to a single vowel, but to a more complex phonetic sequence.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Normanskaja, Julia V. "Новые полевые и архивные данные к глоттохронологической классификации самодийских языков." Oriental Studies 16, no. 5 (December 25, 2023): 1343–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2023-69-5-1343-1366.

Full text

Abstract:

Introduction. Classification of the Samoyedic languages ranks among most popular topics of Uralistics in recent years, with at least six different perspectives — often in contradiction with one another — expressed by leading experts. In fact, there is no single subgroup of the Samoyedic languages on which all the authors would unanimously agree. Goals. The article attempts an analysis of word lists of the Samoyedic languages available on the LingvoDoc platform (lingvodoc.ispras.ru) — recorded from the last native speakers and collected from archives. Materials and methods. The LingvoDoc platform stores a total of 16 Samoyedic-language dictionaries (and text concordances) containing some basic vocabularies. Ten dictionaries were compiled from native speakers (Nenets, Enets, Nganasan, and Selkup dialects), while six others were derived from archival and published sources. They are processed using the glottochronology formula developed by S. Starostin. The LingvoDoc-based analysis yields 3D proximity degree graphs calculated depending on divergence time points of the Samoyedic language unity. Results. It has been determined that, from a glottochronological perspective, there was a certain proximity between Nenets, Enets, and Nganasan traditionally grouped into the North Samoyedic cluster, while Selkup, Mator, and Kamassian are regarded as South Samoyedic. However, these communities were short-lived enough, a longer period of unity be observed between Mator and Kamassian, and between Nenets and Enets. The highest number of words with no etymology in other basic vocabulary lists was found in Selkup dialects (up to 18 lexemes) and in the Nganasan language (13 words), which attests to their prolonged isolated existence. Conclusions. The current analysis supports the validity of the traditional classification of the Samoyedic languages. The involvement of materials from early Selkup texts provides more reliable evidence for delineating a South Samoyedic group.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Ilyina, L. A. "Grammaticalized sensory evidence as typological peculiarity of the North Asian languages." Languages and Folklore of Indigenous Peoples of Siberia, no. 40 (2020): 78–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.25205/2312-6337-2020-2-78-88.

Full text

Abstract:

The paper defines a semantic zone of non-visual sensory evidence, grammaticalized in the verbal system, as “sensory evidence.” Sensory evidence grammaticalized in the verbal system is rare in contemporary languages. It is likely to be found in languages that are or were used in the recent past traditional cultures of ancient origin. Many Eurasian languages have evidential grammatical verbal forms, with most not having sensory evidential forms. Such verbal forms were known as auditive in Eurasia only in four Samoyedic languages: Nenets, Enets, Nganasan, and Selkup. Recently, the traditional Yukaghir folklore archaic texts collected by V. I. Jochelson in the late 19th – early 20th centuries revealed similar grammatical and semantic analog of Samoyedic auditive, suggesting sensory evidential verbal grammemes to be more widespread in the past in the languages of aboriginal Northern Asia peoples, in diachronic retrospective. Our main goal was to identify the inter-disciplinary evidence of diachronically earlier communicative functions and meanings of Northern Asian sensory evidential verbal forms. These functions and meanings are most informatively presented in the archaic texts of Nenets traditional folklore, especially shaman songs and heroic epos. The paper proves basic semantics of the Northern Samoyedic sensory evidential grammemes to refer to the auditive perception of non-visible situations (events). Thus, non-visible events were opposed grammatically to visual situations by verbal forms concerned. Considering historical ethnology data in an interdisciplinary way, the author explains the fact above as a grammaticalized language replica of fundamental mental opposition of ancient mythological thinking – the opposition of visible and non-visible situations.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Гусев, Валентин Юрьевич. "NEW EVENKI-SAMOYEDIC ETYMOLOGIES." Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology, no. 2(28) (September 18, 2020): 9–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.23951/2307-6119-2020-2-9-17.

Full text

Abstract:

В статье предлагается 19 новых этимологий и 1 дополнение к существующей этимологии, которые связывают самодийские языки с эвенкийским. В большинстве случаев предполагается заимствование из эвенкийского языка или его более ранней формы в прасамодийский или отдельные самодийские языки, особенно в нганасанский, и в 2 случаях – заимствование в эвенкийский из какого-то самодийского идиома, близкого к тундровому ненецкому. The paper presents 19 new etymologies and 1 addition to an existing etymology that bring together Samoyedic languages with Evenki. In most cases they presuppose borrowing from Evenki or some its earlier form into Proto-Samoyedic or separate Samoyedic languages, especially Nganasan; 2 etymologies propose borrowing into Evenki from a Samoyedic dialect close to Tundra Nenets. The etymologies under discussion are: TM sōl- ‘mix’ > ? PS *sVl- > *tålå- > Ngan tolu- ‘be mixed’; Ev. kawri(kī) > ? Nen. χăŕei̯, En. koriˀo, Ngan. kəriˀə ‘pole for driving reindeer’; Ev. malŋa ~ PSS məlkə ‘hornless reindeer’; Ev. mə̄ nə̄ - > ? Nen. meneq-, Ngan. mintə- ‘live settled, without wandering’; Ev. čātā > Ngan. satu ‘clay’, En. seδuo, seδui, Ngan. satüə ‘live coals’; Ev. kirka ~ En. kirkaa, Ngan. kirkaˀa ‘short-wooled dog’; Ev. ebej > Nen. abej, En. aboj etc., Ngan əbəj ‘exclamation of fright; frightful; powerful’; Ev. kiri ‘dirt; disgusting’ > ? Ngan. kur ‘rubbish’, kir ‘fly’; Ev. ūďa > Ngan. ŋuə(ďəə) ‘trace, footprint’; Ev. nika > Ngan. ńükü ‘little one’; Ev. činə ‘tree disease, witches’ broom’ > Ngan. sənə (huaa) ‘(tree) with a bare trunk and a thick crown’; Ev. hońo, həńə > Ngan. hoj ‘chink’; Ev. činə-kə̄ > ? Selk. suə̑ nə̠ , En. sanike, Ngan. soni̮, sonali̮ə ‘seagull’; Ev. ūkə̄ ŋ > ? En. uxo-seri, Ngan. uku-ďari̮ ‘loon’; Ev. ugučak ‘saddle reindeer’ > Ngan. uučakə ‘saddle’; Ev. ulikta > Ngan. uľikta ‘dried meat’; Ev. uŋtrə(wūn) ‘shaving-brush’ > ? Selk. umtə/untə ‘beard’, Ev. ude, Ngan. untiə ‘pubis’; Ev. -mō > Ngan. -mə, emphatic suffix; Ev. lamba ‘spoon, scoop etc.’ Nen. lămba; Ev. ďēlar ‘white (reindeer)’ ? North-Sam. jälä ‘day; bright’

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Kuznetsova, Nadežda, and Eleonora Usenkova. "Comparative constructions of similarity in Northern Samoyedic languages." Acta Linguistica Hungarica 61, no. 2 (June 2014): 177–223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/aling.61.2014.2.3.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Resnikova, K. V. "Specific aspects of the samoyedic languages, including the nenets and enets languages." Siberian journal of Anthropology 2, no. 4 (December 27, 2018): 62–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.31804/2542-1816-2018-2-4-62-82.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Urmanchieva, Anna. "Linguistic areas in the history of the Mansi language." Voprosy Jazykoznanija, no. 5 (2022): 7. http://dx.doi.org/10.31857/0373-658x.2022.5.7-34.

Full text

Abstract:

The article is devoted to the reconstruction of historical contacts of the Mansi language with Samoyedic languages. On the modern linguistic map of Western Siberia these languages are not in direct contact, however, linguistic data make it possible to reconstruct several contact situations of varying degrees of temporal depth. I suppose that in the region of the Upper Ob there was a historical linguistic area, which included the Mansi, Selkup, and Kamas languages. In the eastern periphery of this zone, some limited contacts between the Selkups and the Kets took place. The Khanty language was widespread north of the Mansi language, possibly, in the northern periphery of this area. The ancestor of the modern Eastern Khanty language was located closest to the Mansi language. The Mansi contacted with the speakers of the Southern Samoyedic languages most probably across the rivers of Chizhapka and Parabel. Within the same area E. G. Bekker identifi ed the zone of distribution of the Kamas toponymy. During the period of these contacts, in my opinion, Kamas and Selkup were already two separate languages, but the dialectal diff erentiation of Selkup had not yet begun: the article proposes a number of Mansi-Selkup areal isoglosses, equally represented in all Selkup dialects. Subsequently, the relative position of the Khanty and Mansi languages on the linguistic map of Western Siberia changed. The Eastern Khanty penetrated the Upper Ob area. Then the Northern and Southern Khanty settled in a wide zone stretching from north to south along the course of the Middle Ob and Irtysh. This interrupts the connection between the Mansi and the Eastern Khanty and cuts off the Mansi from the Upper Ob area. During this period, the modern “Ostyak” area including the Selkup, Ket, and Khanty languages began to form in the Upper Ob region. The formation of this “Ostyak” area should be attributed to the period after the dialectal differentiation of the both mentioned Uralic languages: this area includes only the easternmost dialects of Khanty and only the Northern and Tym dialects of Selkup.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Mus, Nikolett. "The North Samoyedic interrogative verb meaning ‘say what’." Eesti ja soome-ugri keeleteaduse ajakiri. Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics 11, no. 2 (December 31, 2020): 119–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/jeful.2020.11.2.05.

Full text

Abstract:

A cross-linguistically rare interrogative category (i.e., an interrogative verb with the meaning ‘say what’) is observed in the North Samoyedic (Uralic) languages. The interrogative verb in these languages is used in content questions, and functions as the predicate of the main or the embedded clause. It takes the regular verb morphemes with two exceptions: it (i) does not display object agreement, and (ii) cannot combine with the regular past tense morpheme. Furthermore, there is also an ordering restriction on multiple questions containing the interrogative verb. The morphosyntactic evidence suggests that the North Samoyedic interrogative verb is analyzed as a result of a wh-object incorporation. Kokkuvõte. Nikolett Mus: Põhjasamojeedi keelte küsiverb tähendusega ‘mida ütlema’. Põhjasamojeedi (uurali) keeltes esineb keeleüleselt haruldane küsiv kategooria (st küsiverb tähendusega ’mis asja’). Nendes keeltes kasutatakse küsiverbi sisuküsimustes ja küsiverb toimib pea- või kõrvallauses predikaadina, liitudes tavaliste verbimorfeemidega, välja arvatud kahel juhul: küsiverb (i) ei väljenda objektiühildumist, ja (ii) ei kombineeru lihtmineviku morfeemiga. Lisaks on küsiverbil teatavad järjestuspiirangud küsiverbi sisaldava kompleksküsimuse korral. Morfosüntaktilised andmed viitavad, et põhjasamojeedi küsiverb on analüüsitav kui küsisõnalise objekti inkorporatsiooni tulemus. Аннотация. Николетт Муш: Северосамодийский вопросительный глагол ‘что сказать’. В северосамодийских языках (уральская языковая семья) есть типологически редкий вопросительный глагол со значением ‘что сказать’. Этот глагол используется в частных вопросах в качестве предиката главного или подчиненного предложения. Он принимает обычные словоизменительные суффиксы за двумя исключениями: он не сочетается (i) с объектным спряжением и (ii) с показателем прошедшего времени индикатива. Кроме того, существуют ограничения на относительный порядок вопросов с вопросительным глаголом. Данные морфосинтаксиса свидетельствуют о том, что северносамодийский вопросительный глагол возник в результате инкорпорации объекта — вопросительного местоимениия.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Pineda, David. "Некоторые наблюдения над заимствованиями в русском говоре Кольского полуосторва(Some Observations on Borrowings in the Russian Dialect on the Kola Peninsula)." Poljarnyj vestnik 7 (February 1, 2004): 25. http://dx.doi.org/10.7557/6.1335.

Full text

Abstract:

The present article gives an overview of the borrowed vocabulary of the Rus- sian dialect of the Kola peninsula, which mostly comes from Finno-Ugric languages. Some remarks are made as to the phonetical and morphological adaptations to Russian, the etymology and the distribution of the loanwords over the different semantic fields. Not surprisingly, the terminology on rein- deer husbandry is dominated by loans from Sámi languages. Some names for fishes are also Sámi, but fishing terminology is almost exclusively borrowed from Baltic-Finnic. Other source languages include Samoyedic (clothing), Norwegian and Dutch (ship types).

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

More sources

Books on the topic "Samoyedic languages"

1

Siegl, Florian. Materials on Forest Enets, an indigenous language of Northern Siberia. Helsinki: Société Finno-Ougrienne, 2013.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Wagner-Nagy, Beáta Boglárka. On the typology of negation in Ob-Ugric and Samoyedic languages. Helsinki: Société Finno-Ougrienne, 2011.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Cheremisina, M. I. Predlozhenie v i︠a︡zykakh Sibiri: Sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Novosibirsk: [publisher not identified], 1989.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

A, Morev I͡U︡, and Tomskiĭ gosudarstvennyĭ pedagogicheskiĭ institut imeni Leninskogo komsomola., eds. Struktura samodiĭskikh i eniseĭskikh i͡a︡zykov. Tomsk: Tomskiĭ pedinstitut, 1985.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Az ősi uráli tárgyragok története és vesszőfutása: Accusatum et expulsum. Budapest: Tinta Könyvkiadó, 2022.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Khelimskiĭ, E. A. Komparativistika, uralistika: Lekt͡s︡ii i statʹi. Moskva: I͡A︡zyki russkoĭ kulʹtury, 2000.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Contact-induced perspectives in Uralic linguistics. München: LINCOM Europa, 2000.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Lil, Elma. Ot ėtnogeneza k ėtnofuturizmu: Finno-ugry i samodiĭt︠s︡y. [Place of distrbution not identified]: Izdatelʹskie reshenii︠a︡, 2019.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Hajdu, Péter. The Samoyed Peoples and Languages (Uralic and Altaic). RoutledgeCurzon, 1997.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Konverbkonstruktionen im Kamassischen. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz in Kommission, 2002.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Samoyedic languages"

1

Khanina, Olesya. "A history of Northern Samoyedic: adding details to the dialect continuum hypothesis." In Siberica et Uralica, 77–94. Szeged: University of Szeged, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.14232/sua.2022.56.77-94.

Full text

Abstract:

A striking peculiarity in the historical development of Northern Samoyedic were the never-ending contacts between various groups and thus a dialect continuum spanning their languages. This paper aims at contributing to the solid establishment of this historical scenario by summarizing geographic evidence from the last 400 years, sociolinguistic evidence from the last 200 years, evidence from unpublished manuscripts based on Samoyedic linguistic data from the 18th and 19th centuries, and evidence from the history of reindeer herding in Western Siberia. Different types of data are integrated into a single history of Northern Samoyedic speakers, drawn here with more details than ever before.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Урманчиева, А. Ю. "Система послелогов со значением ‘рядом’, ‘в направлении’, ‘напротив’ в северносамодийских языках и в прасеверносамодийском." In Siberica et Uralica, 95–125. Szeged: University of Szeged, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.14232/sua.2022.56.95-125.

Full text

Abstract:

The paper concernes the formation in the Northern Samoyedic languages of a system of postpositions expressing the meaning of close proximity to a landmark or of movement towards a landmark / away from a landmark / along a landmark. In the Northern Samoyedic languages, this semantic sphere is quite detailed, distinguishing following meanings: A) ‘the action acciplishes near the landmark / starts in a place near the landmark / takes place near the landmark’ (e. g. near the house); B) ‘the action is directed towards the landmark / directed from the side of the landmark / takes place in the vicinity of the landmark’ (goes to the north; goes from the sea side). C) the action is performed in order to reach a landmark (goes to the house); D) the action implies a close contact between the object and the landmark; in this case the specific localization (‘inside’, ‘on the surface’, ‘on the side surface’) is not important (put it in the hand; wrote on the door); E) the action is performed, being localized in a certain way relative to a landmark (lies with feet to the door); F) the action is carried out strictly according to the course set by a landmark (follows the stars; points the knife at the pole); G) the action implies a “malefactive” contact of an object with a landmark (catched on the stone; cut his hand on the knife). These postpositions also developed a set of non-spatial uses: a) the formation of locative cases of personal pronouns; b) comitative meaning; c) the meaning of the equivalent ‘for the sake of something’, ‘in exchange for something’; d) the meaning of the topic (of messages, thoughts, etc.) ‘about something’. The paper reconstructs the development of the system of postpositions in each Northern Samoyedic language from Proto-Northern Samoyedic to the present state.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Siegl, Florian. "Prädikative Kasus und depiktive sekundäre Prädikation in Nordeurasien - eine Vorstudie unter Berücksichtigung der Verhältnisse im Tundrajukagirischen." In Siberica et Uralica, 335–57. Szeged: University of Szeged, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.14232/sua.2022.56.335-357.

Full text

Abstract:

Although a number of Uralic languages, especially Finnic, Saami and Northern Samoyedic possess predicative cases which are used to encode a change of state as well as impermanent states, the existence of such cases is, of course, not a unique feature of Uralic. Similar cases are known e.g. in Yukaghir and Chukchi (and in fact, even beyond). Upon a short areal synopsis, this study covers the so called purposive case in Tundra Yukaghir in great detail and compares its function with that of Forest Enets. Although the grammaticalization history of the Tundra Yukaghir purposive and the Northern Samoyedic essive-translative case shows significant typological parallels since it arose of the grammaticalization of a converbal form of the copula, its synchronic morphosyntax differs significantly, because the Tundra Yukaghir purposive case is used as depictive, whereas the Northern Samoyedic essive-translative is compatible with both depictive and resultative readings.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Кахейнен, Kайсла. "К вопросу о ранних контактах между самодийскими языками: заметки об истории нган. колииң." In Siberica et Uralica, 63–75. Szeged: University of Szeged, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.14232/sua.2022.56.63-75.

Full text

Abstract:

The current article is concerned with the development of Proto-Samoyed *j in intervocalic position in Nganasan. In previous studies, intervocalic PS *j is said to disappear in Nganasan, leading into the formation of secondary vowel sequences in addition to the primary ones inherited from Proto-Samoyed. A more detailed inspection of certain Proto-Samoyed etymologies reveals that *j indeed disappears in intervocalic position unless it is either preceded or followed by a sequence of two vowels, in which case it is preserved and phonetically often strenghtened to d’. The implications of this change are further discussed in light of one particular etymology, that of PS *kåläjə̑ŋ ’mammoth / whale’, for which Nganasan has, in addition to the regular reflex kol’iiŋ ’whale’, several doublet reflexes that appear to be early borrowings from a neighbouring Samoyed language.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Dobzhanskaja, Oksana. "The music of shamanistic rite as a language system (on the example of Samoyed languages)." In Ural-Altaic Studies 1 (1) 2009, edited by Maria Amelina, 31–42. Piscataway, NJ, USA: Gorgias Press, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.31826/9781463234188-004.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Wagner-Nagy, Beáta, and Sándor Szeverényi. "Samoyedic." In The Oxford Guide to the Uralic Languages, 658–73. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198767664.003.0034.

Full text

Abstract:

The Samoyedic branch now consists of the following languages indigenous to Western Siberia: Nenets, Enets, Nganasan, and Selkup. Two Southern Samoyedic languages, Mator and Kamas, are extinct, and also the remaining Samoyedic languages are severely or critically endangered. This chapter describes the characteristics of Samoyedic languages and their background in the reconstructible Proto-Samoyedic. All Samoyedic languages are predominantly agglutinative, but Northern Samoyedic (Enets, Nenets, Nganasan) shows a high degree of fusion in the marking of case and number. In addition to singular and plural, Samoyedic languages have a dual number. Similarly to Ugric and Mordvin, their verbal inflection includes a distinct objective conjugation (object-agreement paradigm). As concerns their syntax, the Samoyedic languages are characterized by PRO-DROP and diverse types of non-finite subordination.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Siegl, Florian. "The Enets languages." In The Oxford Guide to the Uralic Languages, 708–53. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198767664.003.0036.

Full text

Abstract:

Tundra and Forest Enets, indigenous languages spoken on the Taimyr Peninsula in Northern Siberia by several dozen elderly multilingual individuals, are the smallest Samoyedic languages and severely endangered. Until recently, both languages have been classified as dialects of a single language (in older sources also known as "Yenisey Samoyed"), but against recent data, they are better analysed as separate languages, as there are marked differences in phonology, morphology, morphosyntax, and the lexicon. Apparently, syntactic differences are to be expected too, but owing to the scarcity of published Tundra Enets data, this section inevitably remains impressionistic. As Tundra Enets is insufficiently covered, the description will inevitably focus on Forest Enets. Wherever possible, individual language differences will be addressed given that sufficient data is available.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Helimski, Eugen. "Zur Stellung des Matorischen innerhalb der samojedischen Sprachen." In Siberica et Uralica. Szeged: University of Szeged, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.14232/sua.2022.56.479-495.

Full text

Abstract:

This is an unpublished text from the legacy of Eugen Helimski, which discusses the position of Mator inside the Samoyed branch. It shows that Mator may have had specific relations with the North Samoyedic languages, especially with Nenets and Enets, and its ties with Kamas are of thee late, areal origin.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Klumpp, Gerson. "Kamas." In The Oxford Guide to the Uralic Languages, 816–44. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198767664.003.0039.

Full text

Abstract:

Kamas is an extinct Samoyed language of Southern Siberia, most closely related to Selkup. In the extinct Sayan Samoyedic group it is the only language of which proper documentation survives. Its last speaker, Klavdia Plotnikova, died in 1989. Kamas was documented starting from the eighteenth century. Over centuries it had been in close contact with South Siberian Turkic languages, from the nineteenth century on also with Russian. There are two main dialects, Kamas proper and Koybal. The chapter provides an introduction into the grammar of Kamas, based on the main sources from the mid-nineteenth and the beginning of the twentieth century. The chapter also addresses morphosyntactic parallels with Siberian Turkic, as well as the differences between traditional Kamas as documented until 1914 and terminal Kamas, documented in the 1960s and 1970s.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Saarikivi, Janne. "The divergence of Proto-Uralic and its offspring." In The Oxford Guide to the Uralic Languages, 28–58. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198767664.003.0002.

Full text

Abstract:

The chapter deals with the dispersal of Proto-Uralic into reconstructible intermediate protolanguages, from which the current Uralic languages can easily be derived: Proto-Saamic, Proto-Finnic, Proto-Mordvin, Proto-Mari, Proto-Permic, Proto-Samoyedic and the three Ugric languages or language groups traditionally conflated into a subtaxon: Proto-Hungarian, Proto-Mansi, and Proto-Khanty. The Uralic intermediate protolanguages are localized and dated on the basis of loanword strata, areal linguistics, and toponymy. The chapter also discusses the prehistory of each proto-language in terms of speaker populations and their contacts with other ethnic groups, in the light of archaeological evidence of their subsistence and possible migrations. The chapter includes maps and diagrams illustrating the original speaking areas and dispersal of the intermediate protolanguages.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Samoyedic languages"

1

Normanskaja, Julia. "DICTIONARIES ON SAMOYEDIC LANGUAGES AND LINGVODOC SOFTWARE SYSTEM FOR COLLABORATIVE WORK ON DICTIONARIES AND ONLINE PUBLISHING." In NORDSCI Conference on Social Sciences. SAIMA CONSULT LTD, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.32008/nordsci2018/b1/v1/29.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Klubkova, Tat’iana V. "JOHANN SEVERIN VATER AND SAMOYEDS." In 49th International Philological Conference in Memory of Professor Ludmila Verbitskaya (1936–2019). St. Petersburg State University, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.21638/11701/9785288062353.11.

Full text

Abstract:

The purpose of the article is to show the process of formatting a new kind of linguistics, a contribution by A. Schlözer and I. S. Vater of their version of modern linguistics based on the Samoyed (Nenets) language research. The article demonstrates the way the researchers have arrived at their conclusions through careful selection of sources, both published and archived. The 18th century, the “age of systematics”, complete with a new division of sciences, arrived at the transformation of ethnography and linguistics into independent disciplines. Those were prerequisites for the emergence of comparative- historical linguistics. Using the Samoyed language studies as an example, the article examines Schlözer and Vater’s solution of the problems arising in identifying linguistic kinship: the lack of grammatical descriptions and the difficulties of reliable fixation of a non-written language. The works by Vater are the most significant precursors for the first grammar of the Samoyed language, i. e. The Samoyed Grammar by M. Castrén (1854). Schlözer insisted that the Samoyeds were an independent people, and that the section of his Northern History devoted to their community was a traditional comprehensive description of history, geography, customs, and language. The author determines the place of the Samoyed language among the neighboring peoples, critically analyzing the sources while offering a thematic Latin-Samoyed dictionary. Schlözer’s materials were later referred to in the Comparative Dictionaries… by P. S. Pallas. I. S. Vater, realizing the need for a new classification of sciences, headed the department of ethnography and linguistics, thus re-defining the object of linguistics. Regularly addressing the Samoyed language, as well as publishing texts, dictionaries and grammar notes in it, both addressing his informants and actively cooperating with the international academic community, Vater placed the Samoyed language into a rich academic context. The activities of the conscientious and impartial authors in their particular academic field demonstrates a long process of introducing their new information into circulation, together with changes of visual description: from a mixed description (by Schlözer) to the distinction between ethnography and linguistics (Vater). Refs 12.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!