Academic literature on the topic 'Schleiermacher, Friedrich Daniel Ernst (1768-1834)'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Schleiermacher, Friedrich Daniel Ernst (1768-1834).'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Schleiermacher, Friedrich Daniel Ernst (1768-1834)"

1

Nádudvari, Gabriella. "Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher (1768-1834) pedagógiai gondolkodási stílusa az egyensúly eszméjének tükrében." OxIPO 2019, no. 4 (2019): 9–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.35405/oxipo.2019.4.9.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Willand, Marcus. "Historische Angemessenheit als hermeneutisches Konzept, Argument oder Problem?" Journal of Literary Theory 10, no. 1 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jlt-2016-0007.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractArguments about the concept of adequacy (›Angemessenheit‹) of interpretation are as constitutive for many hermeneutic theories of meaning as they are for the interpretive praxis derived from these theories. This essay seeks to illustrate by way of exemplary approaches by Georg Friedrich Meier (1718–1777), Johann Martin Chladenius (1710–1759) and Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher (1768–1834) that very different notions are prevalent within hermeneutics as to what counts as an adequate interpretation. For instance, the ascription ofThe goal of the following elaborations is not, however, a (linguistic) historical derivation of diverse forms of ›Angemessenheit‹. By means of a complex example for the interpretive deployment of (il-)legitimate anachronisms, the semantic conceptions of the three hermeneuticists mentioned above will be exemplified and analyzed with respect to the question of which bids for a specificallyUsing the scheme »a is suitable for b with respect to c«, we can with some clarity reconstruct the problem areas (among others, author, spatiotemporal contexts, reader, hypothetical reader models) associated with adequacy on the interpretive and theoretical levels. However, it will also be shown that a field of reference for arguments about adequacy which limits the scope of statements (»with reference to c«) is seldom explicated. It has to be deduced from precisely those premises which are axiomatic for a specific theory and its conception of meaning. If we compare the explicit arguments, the argumentative fields of reference, and the axiomatic premises of each hermeneutic with one another, we can very clearly prove that 1) there is noAgainst this background, a position can be taken with regard to the two arguments discussed repeatedly over the course of the essay: i) Arguments for adequacy are to be understood as hermeneutic topics and can in this way count as unproblematic aspects of theories of meaning. ii) Arguments for adequacy provide – contrary to i) – references to a previously insufficiently reflected type of argument in literary studies that hardly provides a solution to historically determined difficulties of understanding.The argumentative reference to specifically historical adequacy certainly invokes the central problems of a conception of meaning, but it does not explicate the strategies for solving them. The vagueness that results from such an attempt at reconstructive explication not only indicates the insufficient reflection of this type of argumentation (thesis ii). It also raises the question of whether adequacy – just like plausibility (cf. Winko 2015) – as a
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Schleiermacher, Friedrich Daniel Ernst (1768-1834)"

1

Balcon, Christophe Jean Nicolas. "La construction des savoirs dans l'oeuvre de Friedrich Schleiermacher (1768-1834) : approche dialectique et architectonique." Strasbourg, 2010. http://www.theses.fr/2010STRA1056.

Full text
Abstract:
Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher (1768-1834) est un professeur de théologie à l’Université de Berlin et un pasteur éduqué dans le piétisme. Il sera en 1811 l’un des membres de l’Académie des Sciences de Berlin. Sa réflexion théologique, herméneutique et dialectique requiert notre attention. Nous voulons appréhender sa pensée philosophique et théologique en ayant une approche dialectique et architectonique. En effet, la dialectique en tant que méthode de construction du savoir, philosophie de l’esprit, logique et philosophie de la science est au centre de son œuvre. Nous la retrouvons dans sa réflexion sur la religion, intuition de l’univers, connaissance immédiate et conscience de l’unité du monde<br>Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher (1768-1834) is a pietistically educated teaching pastor, a professor of theology at the University of Berlin, and in 1811, a member of the Berlin Academy of Sciences. His philosophy of religion, his hermeneutics and his dialectics deserve the most attention. We want to give an overview of his philosophical and theological thoughts. A dialectical and architectonic approach is presented. The center of his Work is his dialectics as method of construction of knowledge, as philosophy of mind, logic, and philosophy of science. Based on a feeling of the universe and completed as immediate knowledge, consciousness of the unity of the world is found in his philosophy of religion
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Berner, Christian. "Le probleme des rapports entre hermeneutique et dialectique chez f. D. E. Schleiermacher." Caen, 1993. http://www.theses.fr/1993CAEN1123.

Full text
Abstract:
L'hermeneutique de schleiermacher n'apparait dans sa portee qu'une fois rapportee a l'ethique, science de l'esprit dans son apparition, et a la dialectique, science des conditions et de la construction du savoir. Dans cette perspective, l'unite systematique de la philosophie de schleiermacher est assuree comme developpement d'une problematique ethique de la synthese entre nature et raison ou la saisie du sens (hermeneutique) et l'etablissement de la verite (dialectique) viennent se completer dans une comprehension de l'individu fini et de son expression langagiere.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Reich, Andreas. "Friedrich Schleiermacher als Pfarrer an der Berliner Dreifaltigkeitskirche 1809-1834 /." Berlin ; New York : W. de Gruyter, 1992. http://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb35705766b.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Bazinek, Leonore. "Le "Cours magistral de pédagogie" de Friedrich D. E. Schleiermacher." Paris 8, 2007. http://octaviana.fr/document/143279432#?c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=0.

Full text
Abstract:
On étudie les logiques que Schleiermacher déploie pour mener à bien l'introduction du discours pédagogique dans l'univers des sciences. - Le texte de base est une transcription des Cours Magistraux professés par Schleiermacher en 1826 à l'Université de Berlin, sur la base des rapports de ses étudiants. - Le cadre historique du romantisme allemand joue un rôle subordonné dans notre étude, qui se concentre sur les problématiques dégagées du corpus, traduit par nos soins<br>Our study examines the reflections engaged by Schleiermacher to introduce the new academic section "educational science" at University level. - We have translated his Lectures on Education, delivered in 1826 at the Berlin University and written down by his students. - We do not especially deal with German romanticism, but will concentrate on the problematic questions implied in our text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Ndeh, Dominique. "Religion et éthique : une relecture herméneutique des Discours sur la religion de Schleiermacher." Université de Marne-la-Vallée, 2002. http://www.theses.fr/2002MARN0145.

Full text
Abstract:
Religion et Ethique est une recherche en philosophie de la religion, laquelle doit penser la religion réelle et non construire une religion de la raison. Adossée aux Discours sur la religion de Schleiermacher (1768-1834) dont elle fait une lecture intégrale et actualisante, cette recherche montre que pour mieux comprendre la religion, un dialogue doit être instauré avec l’éthique, l’histoire et les sciences humaines que sont la sociologie et la psychologie. La clarification des expressions : philosophie de la religion, théologie philosophique et philosophie religieuse constitue le premier moment de cette thèse. Elle détermine ensuite la place de la religion dans le système du savoir et pose le principe herméneutique de la fusion des horizons intégrant l’appropriation et la distanciation. Afin que la philosophie ne dénature pas la religion, l’approche tautégorique qui veut que la religion soit comprise par elle-même est adoptée comme méthode d’investigation. Pour Schleiermacher, la religion est intuition de l’Univers et sentiment. Ce qui implique qu’elle a deux versants : subjectif et objectif. Fondée sur la conscience immédiate de soi qui lui assure son autonomie, la religion n’a pas besoin de la médiation de la morale et de la métaphysique pour exister. Par contre, elle se manifeste par des expressions communautaires. C’est à travers la diversité des religions que l’essence de la religion apparaît dans l’histoire. La religion n’est effective que par l’homme, il n’existe pas de religion sans sujet religieux. La thèse considère l’homme comme le lieu herméneutique de la religion, et soutient que la raison de la religion est d’être une herméneutique de l’existence humaine<br>Religion and Ethic is a research in philosophy of religion, which doesn’t construct a religion of reason, but thinks the real religion. Supported by Schleiermacher’s Discours sur la religion (1768-1834), which is read in an integral and actualising way, the research demonstrates that a better understanding of religion must be achieved by the establishment of a dialogue with Ethics, history and human sciences such as sociology and psychology. The clarication of the terms: philosophy of religion, philosophical theology and religious philosophy constitutes the fisrt step of the thesis. It then moves on to determine the position of religion within the system of knowledge, and places the hermeneutic principle of fusion of horizons intagrating appropriation and distanciation. So as to avoid the denaturation of religion by philosophy, the tautegorical approach, which puts forward that religion should be understood by itself, is adopted as method of investigation. For Schleiermacher, religion is intuition of the universe and sentiment. It implies two versants, one subjective and other objective. Founded upon the immediate consciousness of the seft, which ensures its autonomy, religion doesn’t need the mediation of moral and methaphysic to exist. Nevertheless, it manifests itself through communitarian expression. It is through the diversity of religion that the essence of religion emerges in history. Religion is only effective through man since it cannot be without a religious subject. The thesis considers man as hermeneutic site of religion and claims that the reason of religion lays in being a hermeneutic of human existence
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Schleiermacher, Friedrich Daniel Ernst (1768-1834)"

1

Divergent traditions, converging faiths: Troeltsch, comparative theology, and the conversation with Hinduism. P. Lang, 2000.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Wyman, Walter E. The Concept of Glaubenslehre: Ernst Troeltsch and the Theological Heritage of Schleiermacher (American Academy of Religion Academy Series). An American Academy of Religion Book, 2000.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Schleiermacher, Friedrich Daniel Ernst (1768-1834)"

1

Raithel, Jürgen, Bernd Dollinger, and Georg Hörmann. "Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher (1768–1834)." In Einführung Pädagogik. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-93606-6_14.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Markham, Ian S. "Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher (1768-1834)." In The Student's Companion to the Theologians. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118427170.ch44.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Gräb, Wilhelm. "Ein Herrnhuter – höherer Ordnung. Die Spiritualität Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermachers (1768–1834)." In Handbuch Evangelische Spiritualität. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.13109/9783666567193.529.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Cancik, Hubert, and Hildegard Cancik-Lindemaier. "Die Debatte um Strauß’ ›zweites Leben Jesu‹: David Friedrich Strauß (1808–1874), Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher (1768—1854), Otto Thenius (1801–1876), Johann Friedrich Immanuel Tafel (1796—1863)." In Franz Overbeck Werke und Nachlaß. J.B. Metzler, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-00008-8_5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

"Bildung als vom Gefühl zu Gott Getragener Lebensprozess bei Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher (1768-1834)." In Wissen - Glauben - Bilden. Verlag Ferdinand Schöningh, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.30965/9783657771844_005.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!