To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Science of language (Linguistics).
Journal articles on the topic 'Science of language (Linguistics)'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Science of language (Linguistics).'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
B.R, Kadirova. "LINGUISTICS AS A MODERN SCIENCE IN LINGUISTICS." International Journal of Pedagogics 03, no. 02 (February 1, 2023): 43–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.37547/ijp/volume03issue01-08.
Full textAbstract:
The article is devoted to the development of the foundations of a new branch of knowledge — linguoculturology, which emerged at the junction of linguistics and cultural studies and examines the manifestations of the culture of the people, which were reflected and fixed in the language. It shows how culture forms and organizes the thinking of a language personality, language categories and concepts, how one of the fundamental functions of language is carried out — to be a tool for creating, developing, storing and transmitting культурыобъектыcultural objects.It issuggested that vocabulary remains the most stable object in this aspect.
2
Fletcher, Paul. "Language Pathology." Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 10 (March 1989): 26–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0267190500001197.
Full textAbstract:
Language pathology is a broad term, used to refer to the symptoms of speech and language speech and language disorders, the aetiologies of these disorders, and the methods and results of the disciplines which study them. The major disciplines involved are medicine, psychology, and linguistics (including speech science). It is neither possible nore desirable, in an inter-disciplinary field, to ignore the contribution of other sciences. Here, however, the concentration will be, so far as is feasible, on the distincitve role of linguistics in the investigation of language disorders. The term language disorder is used as a general label for any persistent non-normal linguistic behaivor in children or adults.
3
Uktamovna, Khusenova Mekhriniso. "COMPARATIVE TYPOLOGY OF THE ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES." International Journal Of Literature And Languages 03, no. 06 (June 1, 2023): 44–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.37547/ijll/volume03issue06-08.
Full textAbstract:
Comparative linguistics, or comparative-historical linguistics (formerly comparative philology ) is a branch of historical linguistics that is concerned with comparing languages to establish their historical relatedness. This article focuses on the comparative typology of English, Uzbek and discusses the formation of comparative typology as a science, its methods of analysis, and the relations it with other linguistic subjects. Key words-comparative typology, confrontative linguistics, contrastive linguistics, linguistic characterology, comparativists, notions of a type of a language and a type in a language, linguistic universals, recessives and uncials
4
Włodarczyk, Hélène &. Andre, and Andre Włodarczyk. "The Interactive Method for Language Science and Some Salient Results." Zagadnienia Naukoznawstwa 55, no. 3 (April 6, 2022): 73–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/zn.2019.025.
Full textAbstract:
The use of information technology in linguistic research gave rise in the 1950s to what is known as Natural Language Processing, but that framework was created without paying due attention to the need for logical reconstruction of linguistic concepts which were borrowed directly from barely (or even not at all) formalised structural linguistics. The Computer-aided Acquisition of Semantic Knowledge project (CASK) based on the Knowledge Discovery in Databases technology (KDD) enabled us to interact with computers while gathering and improving our knowledge about languages.
Thus, with the help of data mining tools, as a result of revisiting two sorts of generally admitted linguistic theories (the Predicate Argument Structure theory and Information Structure theory), we succeeded in improving these local linguistic approaches by proposing to unify the Associative Semantics (AS) theory (in which we introduced the concept of ortho-information) with the Meta-Informative Centering (MIC) theory (in which we described the meta-informative layer of natural languages). The resulting Distributed Grammar (DG) program (sketched out in this paper) treats, in addition to the above types of information, the third one, para-information (concerning identity and alikeness with respect to context and language ontology) which – despite many studies – had no uniform theoretical background in general linguistics. This DG program aims to lay the foundations for creating the theoretical background of Conceptual Linguistics.
5
Tanwete, Charles Silinda, and Nafari Kombinda. "Object of study and linguistic subdisciplinary." Macrolinguistics and Microlinguistics 1, no. 1 (January 17, 2020): 23–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.21744/mami.v1n1.3.
Full textAbstract:
General linguistics is linguistics that tries to study the rules of language in general. The resulting theoretical statements will concern language in general, not specific languages. Meanwhile, special linguistics is linguistics that tries to study the rules of language specifically. This special study can also be carried out on one language family / sub-family, ex: the Austronesian language family, the Indo-German sub-family. General linguistics is a field of science that not only investigates a particular langue but also pays attention to the characteristics of other languages. Linguistics does not only study one langue but also language. The object of linguistic study is language. The language that is meant in this sense is language in the true sense, namely the language used by humans as a means of communication, not the language in the sense of a class.
6
Feruza Sherali qizi, Mannonova. "NEUROLINGUISTICS AS AN INTERDISCIPLINARY SCIENCE." International Journal of Business, Law, and Education 2, no. 2 (June 29, 2021): 63–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.56442/ijble.v2i2.14.
Full textAbstract:
The article makes a certain contribution to Methodology, Neuro-linguistics, Classroom Management, Cognitive Linguistics, and Text Interpretation. For further investigation we can suggest the followings: cross-level competence on language learning in different types standards and distinguishing skills of language. According to this helpful investigation the state of congruence in neuro-linguistic programming is believed to help with language fluency, as it suggests that teaching non-verbal communication in conjunction with phonology and functional language produces better language learning results.
7
Mursa, Irina N., and Kseniya D. Shadrina. "Journal “Legal Linguistics”: abstract review." Neophilology, no. 1 (2023): 211–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2023-9-1-211-219.
Full textAbstract:
The result of close and significant social, state and scientific interaction between language and law is the development of a new applied branch of linguistic knowledge – Legal Linguistics. The term “legal linguistics” was introduced in 1999. At the same time, the first issue of the publication “Legal Linguistics” was published – a project designed to comprehend and discuss current problems at the intersection of language and law and immediately became one of the most cited scientific sources in the academic community of Russia. The rubrication of the journal, gradually formed in the course of analysis by the editorial board of submitted copyright materials, reflects the most acute and global issues of this scientific direction. In November 2021, a significant event took place that opened a new milestone in the life of a twenty-year-old publication. The journal “Legal Linguistics” is included in the list of peer-reviewed scientific publications, which should publish the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of Candidate of Science, for the degree of Doctor of Science (VAK) in the following specialties: 5.1.1. Theoretical and historical legal sciences, 5.1.4. Criminal Law Sciences, 5.9.5. Russian language. Languages of the peoples of Russia, 5.9.8. Theoretical, applied and comparative linguistics. The work presents an abstract review of the issues of the journal “Legal Linguistics”, summarizing the scientific developments of researchers in the field of interaction between language and law. The specifics of the journal and the periodicity of its publication are analyzed; the main thematic sections and headings are indicated.
8
Lafasov, U. P. "BASICS OF LANGUAGE SCIENCE AMONG UZBEKS." Oriental Journal of Education 02, no. 02 (August 1, 2022): 9–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.37547/supsci-oje-02-02-02.
Full text
9
BETSENKO, Tetyana. "LINGUISTICS AND LANGUAGE SCIENCE: SIDES OF RELEVANCE." Culture of the Word, no. 97 (2022): 50–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.37919/0201-419x-2022.97.6.
Full textAbstract:
The modern school of Ukrainian linguistic stylistics produces new approaches, formulates new theoretical positions, generates current, relevant directions of research, marks the latest ideas in the field of linguistic stylistic studies, which testifies to the significant achievements of the national linguistic stylistic scientific school in the world continuum. Ukrainian scientists, noting the change in the scientific paradigm of linguistic-stylistic research, direct attention to the integrative approach in modern linguistic-stylistics as a field of scientific knowledge. Justifying integrative approaches to the definition of the main categories of stylistics and style, pointing out the need to use new methods of interpreting artistic texts, they emphasize the role of linguistic stylistics in the education of linguistic personality. The proven emergence of stylistic research into a wider range of linguistic, literary, folkloristic, cultural, social and communication topics is dictated by the scientific and educational demands of our time. At the time of integration of linguistic stylistics with oral folk literature – a linguistic oral lexicologist. Linguistics is the science of language styles, varieties, forms of speech, language means of all levels. Linguistic oral verbal science studies the language of folklore works. Today, in stylistics, the question of the independence of the folk language style remains unsolved. There is an opinion that folklore can be qualified as a separate type of artistic style or, more broadly, as a separate functional style of literary language. The proven influence of the language of oral creativity on the development of the stylistic system of the Ukrainian language (the selection of colorful and stylistic varieties of the language). In linguistic stylistics, folk songs have been established as a stylistic category. The doctrine of linguistic and aesthetic signs of Ukrainian culture (S.Ya. Yermolenko) also appeals to the depths of the language of oral folk creativity. Connections of linguistic oral word science with all sections of stylistics are observed. The use of stylistic terminology in the process of analyzing the language of texts of oral folk literature is evidenced. The influence of oral folk literature on the development of the artistic style of the Ukrainian language is undeniable.
10
Argamon, Shlomo Engelson. "Register in computational language research." Register Studies 1, no. 1 (April 26, 2019): 100–135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/rs.18015.arg.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract Shlomo Argamon is Professor of Computer Science and Director of the Master of Data Science Program at the Illinois Institute of Technology (USA). In this article, he reflects on the current and potential relationship between register and the field of computational linguistics. He applies his expertise in computational linguistics and machine learning to a variety of problems in natural language processing. These include stylistic variation, forensic linguistics, authorship attribution, and biomedical informatics. He is particularly interested in the linguistic structures used by speakers and writers, including linguistic choices that are influenced by social variables such as age, gender, and register, as well as linguistic choices that are unique or distinctive to the style of individual authors. Argamon has been a pioneer in computational linguistics and NLP research in his efforts to account for and explore register variation. His computational linguistic research on register draws inspiration from Systemic Functional Linguistics, Biber’s multi-dimensional approach to register variation, as well as his own extensive experience accounting for variation within and across text types and authors. Argamon has applied computational methods to text classification and description across registers – including blogs, academic disciplines, and news writing – as well as the interaction between register and other social variables, such as age and gender. His cutting-edge research in these areas is certain to have a lasting impact on the future of computational linguistics and NLP.
11
Ashurova, Delyaram, and Margarita Galieva. "Cultural Linguistics: Main Issues, Trends and Tasks." Uzbekistan: language and culture 1, no. 2 (June 10, 2019): 42–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.52773/tsuull.uzlc.2019.2/ubbd9506.
Full textAbstract:
Linguistics of the XXI century is intensively developing the idea that language is not only an instrument of communication but also the cultural code of a nation. It happened due to the development of a new anthropocentric paradigm, which gives the human the status of being “the measure of all things” and focuses on studying the “human factor” in the language. The emergence of the anthropocentric paradigm caused the shift in linguistic views, methods of investigations and the emergence of new interdisciplinary linguistic trends such as Sociolinguistics, Cognitive Linguistics, Cultural Linguistics (Linguoculturology), Gender Linguistics, etc., which focus on the study of relationships between language and society, language and mind, language and culture. Among these trends, one of the actively developing interdisciplinary linguistic sciences is Cultural Linguistics (Linguoculturology) aimed to investigate the correlation between language and culture, between linguistic meanings and the concepts of universal and national cultures. Currently, though Linguoculturology is a comparatively new science there distinguished within it several trends: lexicographical, phraseological, conceptological, stylistic and comparative. Each of these trends focus on the investigation of a particular aspect of Cultural Linguistics and therefore they have their own research problems and tasks. The article deals with the identification of these trends, and highlights their theoretical assumptions, evolution, main problems and achievements done within each trend.
12
Musthofa, Musthofa. "COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS (Model Baru Kajian Linguistik dalam Perspektif Komputer)." Adabiyyāt: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra 9, no. 2 (December 31, 2010): 247. http://dx.doi.org/10.14421/ajbs.2010.09203.
Full textAbstract:
This paper describes a new discipline in applied linguistics studies, computational linguistics. It’s a new model of applied linguistics which is influenced by computer technology. Computational linguistics is a discipline straddling applied linguistics and computer science that is concerned with the computer processing of natural languages on all levels of linguistic description. Traditionally, computational linguistics was usually performed by computer scientists who had specialized in the application of computers to the processing of a natural language. Computational linguists often work as members of interdisciplinary teams, including linguists (specifically trained in linguistics), language experts (persons with some level of ability in the languages relevant to a given project), and computer scientists. The several areas of computational linguistics study encompasses such practical applications as speech recognition systems, speech synthesis, automated voice response systems, web search engines, text editors, grammar checking, text to speech, corpus linguistics, machine translation, text data mining, and others. This paper presents the definition of computational linguistics, relation between language and computer, and area of computational linguistics studies.
13
Mezhoud, Salim. "Language Mathematics and Mathematics Language, Reading from Computational Linguistics." Mathematical Linguistics 1, no. 1 (December 31, 2021): 7–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.58205/ml.v1i1.140.
Full textAbstract:
The language of mathematics is the system used by mathematicians to communicate mathematical ideas among themselves. This language consists of a substrate of some natural language using technical terms and grammatical conventions that are peculiar to mathematical discourse, supplemented by a highly specialized symbolic notation for mathematical formulas.
mathematical characterizations of various notions of linguistic complexity include also computational linguistics, philosophical logic, knowledge representation as a branch of artificial intelligence, theoretical computer science, and computational psychology. Mathematical linguistics has initially served as a foundation for computational linguistics, though its research agenda of designing machines to simulate natural language understanding is clearly more applied. Inductive methods have gained the upper hand in applied computational linguistics
The question is whether mathematics is a language, or that language is mathematical, and how computational linguistics employs language as mathematics.
14
Lidz, J., and L. Pearl. "LINGUISTICS: Language Learning Through Selection." Science 315, no. 5810 (January 19, 2007): 332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1135673.
Full text
15
Murray, Stephen O. "The first quarter century of the Linguistic Society of America, 19240–1949." Historiographia Linguistica 18, no. 1 (January 1, 1991): 1–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/hl.18.1.03mur.
Full textAbstract:
Summary The Linguistic Society of America was founded in 1925 by scholars trained in traditional philological methods but more interested in building a science of linguistics than in literary studies. Language, the official journal of the new society became an organ for structural descriptions of sound systems of diverse languages. The Linguistic Institute, a summer training program, speeded diffusion of the new structuralist methods. Focus on native speech rather than on literary texts was a hallmark of the ‘application’ of structuralist linguistics to the teaching of languages in military intensive language programs during the Second World War, and in some academic programs (notably at Cornell University) after the war. After the war Language expanded, and a number of other linguistics journals began publishing. The extent to which these other journals were complements and the extent to which they were rivals remains controversial. Patterns of publications follow lines of theoretical divergence within what is sometimes mistakenly regarded as a neo-Bloomfieldian monolith. It is argued that the self-annuling prestige of the linguistic analyst in the process of language learning contributed to the difficulty of establishing a profession based on ‘the science of language’ in the late 1940s and through the 1950s. The analytical role of native speakers in the Bloomfieldian tradition is contrasted with that in the Sapirian tradition.
16
Polyakov, О. M. "R-linguistics. The Principle of Linguistic Duality." Discourse 9, no. 2 (April 21, 2023): 103–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2023-9-2-103-110.
Full textAbstract:
Introduction. R-linguistics uses the axiomatic method in its approach to modeling the world and language [1]. Axioms define the categories of language, their properties and ways of formation. On this basis, when processing the accumulated data in the form of relations, it is possible to form systems of categories and determine the verbs connecting these categories. A reasonable question arises: if categories (to be such) must satisfy certain axioms, does this requirement apply to verbs as well? The purpose of this article is to deal with this issue.Methodology and sources. The results of the previous parts of the series are used as research tools. The axioms and methods of verb categorization formulated earlier are used to develop the necessary mathematical representations of the verb axiomatics.Results and discussion. The article introduces the axiom for the verbs of the language (the axiom of the verbal cross) and shows that this axiom is related to the categorization axiom (the correctness axiom). Although this connection is not identical, it becomes such with the additional use of the axiom of extensiveness. This relationship made it possible to formulate the fundamental principle of linguistics – the principle of duality.Conclusion. The axiomatics of verbs and categories of a language turns out to be connected, and one determines the other, so that by and large it does not matter which of them is the source of the model of the world and the appearance of language. This unity is formulated as the principle of duality in linguistics. The manifestations of the principle of duality in the language are diverse, but this article focuses on the discussion of the appearance in the language of verbs-processes and adverbs. This transition is considered, starting with obtaining the initial data about the world, to the emergence of ideas about processes and adverbs as a feature system of verbs.
17
Seldikov, Aleksandr Mergenovich, Timur Stanislavovich Goryaev, Badma Erdnievich Dovunov, Snezhana Valerevna Shonkhorova, and Aleksandr Vladimirovich Katashov. "To the question on methodology of the concept in modern science." Litera, no. 10 (October 2020): 114–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.25136/2409-8698.2020.10.34002.
Full textAbstract:
The scientific works of scholars and experts dedicated to conceptology, intercultural communication, and linguistics became the foundation for this research. The author analyzes bibliography, presents various approaches towards conceptology, formulates main conclusions of recent research on the indicated problematic, as well as provides specific examples. Research of the concepts presented in different linguistic worldviews, including Russian linguistic paradigm of the world, is first and foremost substantiated by the importance of intercultural communication in the current context. The relevance of this topic is defined by the significance of studying the dialogue of cultures, language, culture and mentality. The selected topic is of interest to the philosophers, linguists, culturologists and foreign language pedagogues. In anthropological linguistics, cognitive linguistics, psycholinguistics, sociolinguistics, ethnolinguistics, linguoculturology and other fields, the subject of research is the concept of the dialogue of cultures along with interaction between language, culture and mentality. The development of Russian relations on international arena over the past decade led to active cooperation in the area of education, economy, trade and tourism. Therefore, there is an urgent need for studying communication in the situation of interaction between the representatives of Russian and foreign cultures from the perspective of teaching languages as a means of intercultural communication. The need to study communication is justified by different communication behavior in Russia and other countries in the cultural aspect. Insufficient understanding of the language of communication can result in communication failures and even initiate cross-cultural conflict. In the following paragraphs of this article, the author gives detailed attention to specificity of the concept in the linguistic worldviews.
18
BEHME, CHRISTINA. "A ‘Galilean’ science of language." Journal of Linguistics 50, no. 3 (May 7, 2014): 671–704. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022226714000061.
Full textAbstract:
The Science of Language, published in the sixth decade of Noam Chomsky's linguistic career, defends views that are visibly out of touch with recent research in formal linguistics, developmental child psychology, computational modeling of language acquisition, and language evolution. I argue that the poor quality of this volume is representative of the serious shortcomings of Chomsky's recent scholarship, especially of his criticism of and contribution to debates about language evolution. Chomsky creates the impression that he is quoting titbits of a massive body of scientific work he has conducted or is intimately familiar with. Yet his speculations reveal a lack of even basic understanding of biology, and an unwillingness to engage seriously with the relevant literature. At the same time, he ridicules the work of virtually all other theorists, without spelling out the views he disagrees with. A critical analysis of the ‘Galilean method’ demonstrates that Chomsky uses appeal to authority to insulate his own proposals against falsification by empirical counter-evidence. This form of discourse bears no serious relation to the way science proceeds.
19
Orgoňová, Oľga. "Language – speech – social inclusion." Journal of Linguistics/Jazykovedný casopis 71, no. 2 (December 1, 2020): 269–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/jazcas-2020-0026.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract The study presents an overview of reflections on the synergic application of methodological paradigms in predominantly paradigmatic structuralism after the communicative and pragmatic turn in linguistics. The reflections on methodological continuity are applied to the research of the active aspect of language rooted in the real social world. These theoretical pillars of linguistic research are seen in relation to the methodological situation in the humanities, as well as in the social sciences and are enriched with stimuli from the functioning of the so-called civil science. The foundations of researching and stimulating social inclusion are laid on the background of the mentioned theoretical frameworks, with the support of a selected professional semi-variety of the national language. The so-called easy language rooted in the professional vocabulary for the laymen, created by linguists and supported by civil science in the conditions of liberalization of the digital era society, becomes the medium for optimizing social relations between experts and non-experts.
20
Askhatkyzy, B., and U. T. Kydyrbayeva. "Dictionaries oflinguistics in the Kazakh andTurkish languages from the XX century to the present: comparative analysis." Bulletin of the L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. Political Science. Regional Studies. Oriental Studies. Turkology Series. 134, no. 1 (2021): 109–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.32523/2616-6887/2021-134-1-109-121.
Full textAbstract:
Linguistics is a branch of science that reflects the internal laws and rules of the language. Thanks to dictionaries published in the field of linguistics, you can see whether terms are formed in a particular system or not.The article analyzes description oflinguistic dictionaries published in theKazakh and Turkish languages from the twentieth century to thepresentday.Various factors have influenced the change in language throughout the century. For example, in Kazakh linguistics before independence, most of the terms were given Russian names. The grammar of theArabic, Persian and Western languages had a particular influence on the formation of Turkish linguistics. In the article, there are analyzed features and disadvantages of the internal structure of dictionaries and there has been determined their number. An example of a linguistic term for each dictionary is also provided.There wereused such linguistic method as comparative historical analysisand description
21
Müller, Natascha. "AAiMLL: Acquisition Advantages in MultiLingual Learners: The Case of the Multilingual Child." Languages 9, no. 1 (December 21, 2023): 8. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/languages9010008.
Full textAbstract:
Cognitive science has demonstrated that multilinguals (including children) show a cognitive advantage over monolinguals. Linguistics has provided evidence that multilinguals (including children) are able to successfully separate their lexicons and grammars and negotiate multilingual environments. Apart from these achievements, linguistics has generally failed to demonstrate a multilingual advantage related to the multilingual’s linguistic proficiency. The present article summarizes the current literature, which shows that there are first indications of an acceleration effect in multilingual children. This effect is discernable if the languages radically differ, if the child uses a ‘weak’ language (often a minority language), if the child acquires more than two languages from birth, and if contact with the language exhibiting the acceleration effect is delayed until kindergarten age. This kind of acceleration effect represents an explanation gap under current theorizing in cognitive science and linguistics, and calls for a new language acquisition theory, a best-of-breed solution for further research in language acquisition. AAiMLL (Acquisition Advantages in MultiLingual Learners) combines cognitive and linguistic aspects with a threshold theory. It is claimed here that the multilingual child learns from two cognitive acquisition strategies. One is fed by grammatical features, and requires the child to (re-)use already acquired knowledge by generalizing to new domains. The other strategy enables the child to consider rejected alternatives of earlier decisions in one language, for use in the other language. An acceleration effect related to the multilingual’s linguistic proficiency is indicative of the success of both strategies. The success of the strategies is argued to be related to a threshold of language usage from a quantitative or a qualitative perspective.
22
Pavlič, Matic. "Selected topics in Slovenian Sign Language linguistics." Hrvatska revija za rehabilitacijska istraživanja 58, Special Issue (October 12, 2022): 175–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.31299/hrri.58.si.9.
Full textAbstract:
Minority languages are often given less importance than national languages, especially when the languages differ in their modalities. In addition, the hearing majority often do not recognise sign languages, leading to prejudice and discrimination against them. Apart from the theoretical relevance of the study of sign languages for linguistic research, linguistic studies have proved crucial in reducing the social and cultural isolation of Deaf communities. At the same time, the specific sociolinguistics of sign languages must be considered when conducting such linguistic research. This paper presents relevant background information that needs to be considered when conducting research on the grammar of Slovenian Sign Language (SZJ), as well as the research topics in SZJ linguistics that have been addressed in recent decades.
23
KHADRA , Chettouh. "LINGUISTIC FOUNDATIONS OF TERMINOLOGY ACCORDING TO MAHMOUD FAHMY HEGAZY THE INTERSECTION OF CRITICAL TERMINOLOGY AND MODERN LINGUISTICS AS AN EXAMPLE." International Journal of Humanities and Educational Research 03, no. 06 (December 1, 2021): 493–502. http://dx.doi.org/10.47832/2757-5403.6-3.37.
Full textAbstract:
Linguistic research is based on two principles: the specific and the general. The specific aspect is linked to the fact that linguistics is considered as an autonomous science having its scientific characteristics which distinguish it from other human sciences. And given its particular interest in language, it has its internal and external foundations and its own objectives. It describes the structure of the language, seeks to know its secrets, explores its rules which control its fundamental structure, and among other things delves into its sound, structural and semantic characteristics in order to put a set of universal rules. As for the general aspect, it is linked to the relationship existing between linguistics and the other sciences: a relationship of mutual influence. Linguistic research has played a major role in the institution of contemporary Arab critical terminology starting from its beginning in the 1960s. Critical research aims to institute critical terminology according to a system influenced by the descriptive approach in the institution of thematic and conceptual oriented terminology. This article aims to highlight the collaborative relationship between linguistic research and critical research. So what are the limits of this collaboration, What are the linguistic bases of terminology according to the perception of Mahmoud Fahmy Hegazy in his The Linguistic Foundations of Terminology as a model reflecting the efforts of Arabs in the field of critical linguistics.
24
Sunu Setiawan Utama, Andhika Wirya Nuswantoro, Andrian Febrianto, and Slamet Mulyono. "Hubungan Kekerabatan Bahasa Jawa Dan Bahasa Melayu (Kajian Linguistik Historis Komparatif)." Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa dan Budaya 2, no. 3 (July 16, 2023): 60–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.55606/jpbb.v2i3.1972.
Full textAbstract:
Language as a means of human communication has become one of the interesting studies from time to time considering that language is dynamic. The science that studies language is linguistics, in which between branches of linguistics there is comparative historical linguistics. This study aims to describe how comparative linguistic studies are between Javanese regional languages and Malay regional languages. This research uses descriptive qualitative and quantitative methods. Qualitatively it functions to collect data and analyze it both orally and in writing, while quantitatively to get comparisons and the number of percentages between language kinships obtained by using lexicostatistics techniques. The data source for this research is a Pontianak Malay language text entitled Bawang Merah and Bawang Puteh . The steps taken to determine language kinship are: (1) determine the basic vocabulary of Bawang Merah and Bawang Puteh folklore, (2) determine the pairs of the two languages, (3) determine the time of separation and age of language kinship. Based on the results of the analysis, Javanese and Malay were the only languages between 2325 – 1845 years ago. Javanese and Malay languages separated into a proto language between 302 - 178 AD (calculated by 2023).
25
Luchkanyn, Sergiy. "THE FEATURES OF IDEOLOGIZATION OF GENERAL LINGUISTICS IN UKRAINIAN AND ROMANIAN SCIENCE ABOUT LANGUAGE (THE XXST CENTURY)." Studia Linguistica, no. 14 (2019): 107–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.17721/studling2019.14.107-117.
Full textAbstract:
The imposition of official state ideology (Marxism-Leninism) is characteristic for Ukrainian and Romanian theoretical linguistics of the middle and second half of the 20th century. It was the leading methodology for solving the problems of nature and essence of the human language. With its help, it was possible to study internal structure of the linguistic system and use linguistic research methods, which are the subject of general linguistics. Issues that are related to the problems of ideology and specific linguistics (Ukrainization, Russification, Romanization, Magyarization, etc.) are not considered and addressed. The subject of research is the penetration of official state ideology into linguistic questions about the nature and essence of language, its reflection in the methods of linguistic research. In Ukrainian Soviet theoretical linguistics of the 1930–1940s, Marism was officially propagated as a proletarian ideology directed against bourgeois comparative studies. Some Ukrainian linguists, following Ivan Meshchaninov (which then was the official head of Soviet linguistics), used the name Marr as a “shield”. They started with quoting Marr in their own works, but that did not affect much the language material investigation (for example, Academician Mykhailo Kalynovych (1888-1949) and others). After appearance of Stalin’s work “Marxism and Problems of Linguistics” (1950), well-known quotes from this work occured widely in Ukrainian and Romanian theoretical linguistics. They were about the class nature of the language, developed the ideas of revolutionary upheavals in it, stated the need for a dialectical combination of language learning with the history of the society. They have been quoted in the linguistic literature of Ukraine until the 22nd Congress of the CPSU (1961). In Romania, they have been quoted until the death of Gheorghe Gheorghiu-Dej (1965). Only by this time the development of linguistic structuralism had begun, because the linguistic outlook of the “leader” allowed comprehending lingual facts exclusively within the framework of comparative-historical and descriptive paradigm.
26
Kukić, Marko. "Contrastive analysis of word-formation processes of derivation and inflection in English and Serbian." Reci Beograd 14, no. 15 (2022): 50–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/reci2215050k.
Full textAbstract:
Language as the primary means of communication has been developing for centuries. Each unit within a language, starting from sounds, words, phrases, and sentences, has been changed and harmonized with norms, reforms, and modern linguistic theories. Linguistic theories, which have been adopted and proposed, are part of the framework of language science. As the science of language dates back to ancient times, different terms were used for the mentioned field. Today, the science that delves into the research, influence, and shaping of a language is linguistics. This research aims to display the part of linguistics that deals with the study of word formation and its processes. The paper is based on a theoretical and practical presentation of the basic morphological processes of the English language, derivation and inflection. Special attention is paid to conversion and back-formation. Furthermore, the paper sheds light on the role of the morphological notions of root, stem, and base. Not only does the paper examine the morphological notions, but it also compares and contrasts the above-stated processes within English and Serbian languages relying on contrastive analysis. The main goal is to establish the degree of equivalence of word-formation processes between the two languages. The obtained results indicate that certain morphological processes of the two languages posess direct equivalents, but some do not share complete or direct equivalence.
27
ÜÇER, Gamze. "DİLBİLİM TARİHİ BAĞLAMINDA RUS DİLBİLİMİN GELİŞİM SÜRECİ." TOBIDER - International Journal of Social Sciences 6, no. 1 (May 29, 2022): 239–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.30830/tobider.sayi.10.11.
Full textAbstract:
Development of linguistics has gone through various stages until it became an independent science. The universal structure of the language, as well as the features that distinguish it from other languages, form the basis of linguistic research. Linguistics researchers have different views and fields of study on this basis. Throughout the history of linguistics, research on language and the methods used by these researches have led to the emergence of different schools. Scientists who were influenced from each others, used the same methods in the language they studied and from time to time they contributed to the expansion of linguistics by adding on these methods and studies. Similar processes exist for linguistic studies in Russia. Russian linguists, who are followers of the studies in the field of linguistics, have been the founders of new movements and schools, while operating on a similar level to the studies of other scientists. In the beginning, dictionary studies and research in the field of dictionary and grammar studies have evolved into evaluation of nature of language, comparison of languages, evaluating historical aspects, social and spiritual aspects of language. The intensity of studies in the field of linguistics in Russia increased gradually in the 19th century and formed the basis for 20th-century linguistic studies. Russian linguists who carried out their studies in the 19th-century both influenced their contemporaries and became a guided 20th-century linguists. In this respect, the aim of the study is to examine the developmental stages of linguistics in Russia based on the history of linguistics and to reveal these stages in general terms. In addition, the studies of Russian linguists and the development of Russian linguistics in the historical process are mentioned.
28
Ebzeeva, Yulia N. "QS Subject Focus Summit 2020 on Modern Languages and Linguistics: Languages and migration in a globalized world." Russian Journal of Linguistics 25, no. 2 (December 15, 2021): 299–316. http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-2-299-316.
Full textAbstract:
This article summarizes some of the results of the first QS Subject Focus Summit on Linguistics and Modern Languages held jointly with the RUDN University on December 15-17, 2020. It provides rationale for the choice of venue of this linguistic forum and analyzes the most relevant topics of discussion, including interdisciplinarity in modern linguistic research, comparative studies of languages and cultures, and intercultural and cross-cultural communication. Participants explored the topics as diverse as the role of linguistics in developing artificial intelligence systems and application of artificial intelligence in linguistic research, the dynamics of languages in minority situations and the efforts in preserving endangered languages. They dwelt on the current state of translation studies and discussed prospects for their future in view of advances in computer technologies, and many others. The articles included in this issue and authored by the Summit participants clearly show that language has become an object of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary studies. Moreover, the interdisciplinary research paradigm is manifested not only in the convergence of linguistics with other areas of humanities, but also with sciences. This article provides a brief overview of the contributions which present major paradigms of modern linguistics. It highlights the importance of applying computer technologies in linguistic research and emphasizes the necessity to modify language policies in order to preserve minority languages and meet the needs of language education in a multilingual and multicultural environment.
29
Bara, Aicha. "Computational Linguistics Approach." Mathematical Linguistics 2, no. 1 (December 31, 2022): 100–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.58205/ml.v2i1.155.
Full textAbstract:
This article aims to explain the field of computational linguistics and its specializations، its interest in computational modeling of natural language، and the study of computational approaches appropriate to linguistic questions. In general، computational linguistics draws on linguistics، computer science، artificial intelligence، mathematics، logic، philosophy، cognitive science، cognitive psychology، psycholinguistics، anthropology، and neuroscience، among others.
30
Aldasheva, K. S., K. A. Kabassova, K. B. Koptleuova, and D. A. Karagoishiyeva. "SYNERGISTIC POSSIBILITIES OF LANGUAGE RESEARCH." Tiltanym 92, no. 4 (December 30, 2023): 3–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.55491/2411-6076-2023-4-3-11.
Full textAbstract:
As it is known, in accordance with the paradigmatic prism, the formation and development of linguistics as a science for a number of years have traditionally been correlated with comparative-historical, system-structural directions. It should be noted that in recent years, language and speech have been considered in aspects of anthropocentrism. The transition of general scientific evolution to a synergetic platform requires a different methodology for studying linguistic objects. In world linguistics, the methodological possibilities of synergetics are actively used for linguistic research, attempts are being made to interpret language and its sublevels (phonetics, word formation, lexicology, syntax, text, discourse, translation studies, etc.) as a synergetic, self-organizing, complex system in which it is constantly in dynamics. As a result of scientific research, a new direction of linguistics was formed – language synergetics / linguosynergetics. Language synergetics / linguosynergetics is a methodological platform for analyzing and modeling the evolution, development, open nature of the national language, and dynamic processes in it. As a new scientific direction, the synergetics of language allows Kazakh linguistics to develop in accordance with the scientific trends of world linguistics. The article analyzes the formation of a synergetic trend in world linguistics, the first searches and results in order to substantiate the concept of "language is a synergetic system".
31
Kusse, Holger. "Lingwistyka kulturowa i kulturoznawcza. Od Humboldta do dyskursu." tekst i dyskurs - text und diskurs, no. 13 (2020) (December 30, 2020): 149–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.7311/tid.13.2020.08.
Full textAbstract:
The combination of linguistics and cultural analysis leads back to Wilhelm von Humboldt’s concept of linguistic worldview. In it, a direct connection between thinking and speaking (in a particular ethnic or national language) is presupposed, thus implying the influence of languages on cultures. In contrast to this postulate of the unity of languages and cultures, discourse-sensitive linguistics shows the diversity of varieties within ethno- or national-language-demarcated cultures. Linguistics in cultural studies thus escapes the danger of hypostasis of languages and cultures and methodologically becomes an integrative linguistics in which systemic, pragma- and sociolinguistic methods can be incorporated. Discourse-sensitive cultural linguistics analyzes cultures according to thematic and, above all, institutional discourses (of politics, religion, law, economics, science, etc.) and examines language use down to the level of individual utterances and their linguistic microstructures within the framework of these discursive macro levels. Another type is perlocutionary discourses which almost exclusively aim at the effect of communicative actions: advertising, propaganda, scandalous discourses etc. Discourse types are shown by Russian examples, especially the Russian national hymn, the provocative performances of the group Pussy Riot as an example of scandalous discourses, and state patriotic education as an example of propaganda discourses.
32
Smolensky, Paul, and Emmanuel Dupoux. "Universals in cognitive theories of language." Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32, no. 5 (October 2009): 468–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x09990586.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractGenerative linguistics' search for linguistic universals (1) is not comparable to the vague explanatory suggestions of the article; (2) clearly merits a more central place than linguistic typology in cognitive science; (3) is fundamentally untouched by the article's empirical arguments; (4) best explains the important facts of linguistic diversity; and (5) illuminates the dominant component of language's “biocultural” nature: biology.
33
Gojayeva, Shukufa. "MODERN LEXICOLOGY AND ITS MAIN BRANCHES." Scientific Journal of Polonia University 56, no. 1 (June 1, 2023): 35–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.23856/5605.
Full textAbstract:
The field of linguistics, the scientific study of human natural language, is a growing and exciting area of study, with an important impact on fields as diverse as education, anthropology, sociology, language teaching, cognitive psychology, philosophy, computer science, neuroscience, and artificial intelligence, among others. Indeed, the last five fields cited, along with linguistics, are the key components of the field of cognitive science, the study of the structure and functioning of human cognitive processes. In spite of the importance of the field of linguistics, many people, even highly educated people, will tell you that they have only a vague idea of what the field is about. Some believe that a linguist is a person who speaks several languages fluently. What is linguistics, then? Fundamentally, the field is concerned with the nature of language and (linguistic) communication. It is apparent that people have been fascinated with language and communication for thousands of years, yet in many ways we are only beginning to understand the complex nature of this aspect of human life.
34
Izzah, Nailul, M. Agus Mushodiq, and Muhammad Syaifullah. "Semantics of Lexicology in the Study of Arabic Phonemes and Lexemes." Mantiqu Tayr: Journal of Arabic Language 1, no. 1 (January 11, 2021): 71–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.25217/mantiqutayr.v1i1.1327.
Full textAbstract:
Linguistics is the name of the field of science, and the adjective is linguistic. Meanwhile in Arabic, the linguistic equivalent is known as Ilmu lughah or al-lisaaniyyat. The study of language is generally directed at four discussions. First, regarding the sounds of language. If the research of language sounds is carried out without looking at the sound function it is known as phonetic, whereas if the study of language sounds by looking at the sound function in language it is known as phonology. Second, the study of the form of the word (sharf). In the sharf, it is studied about changing the words of a language, where this science is known as morphology. Third, discussion of sentence structure (nahwu). The scope of study in Nahwu is the wording of a sentence in a language, this knowledge is known as syntax or grammar. Fourth, discussion about the good meaning of a word, sentence, or the meaning of an expression. This science is called semantics. Linguistics can be divided into two major branches, namely micro linguistics and macro linguistics. The object of micro linguistic study is the internal structure of the language itself, including the structure of phonology, morphology, syntax, and lexicon. While the object of factors outside of language is such as sociological, psychological, anthropological, and ethnolinguistic factors. The author will only discuss phonology (phoneme) and lexicology (lexeme) in an Arabic linguistic study using library research methods.
35
Shodieva, Shokhida Inatovna. "BASIC CONCEPTS OF COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS." CURRENT RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PEDAGOGICS 02, no. 12 (December 1, 2021): 156–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.37547/pedagogics-crjp-02-12-31.
Full textAbstract:
This article discusses the basic concepts of cognitive linguistics. This lays the groundwork for a deeper understanding of the nature of language and thinking, language and mind connections in linguistic research. Cognitive linguistics is a linguistic field that to some extent unites the research conducted in these areas.This science involves cognitive processes, also known as cognition related to knowledge and information, for the application of special applications. This requires a clear definition of the content of Uzbek cognitive linguistics, its relationship with other disciplines, the development of specific methods of research and analysis.
36
Love, Nigel. "Science, language and linguistic culture." Language & Communication 29, no. 1 (January 2009): 26–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2008.04.001.
Full text
37
Kim, Agnes, and Ludwig M. Breuer. "On the Development of an Interdisciplinary Annotation and Classification System for Language Varieties – Challenges and Solutions." Journal of Linguistics/Jazykovedný casopis 68, no. 2 (December 1, 2017): 191–207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jazcas-2017-0029.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract The Special Research Programme (SFB) ‘German in Austria: Variation – Contact – Perception’ is a project financed by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF F60). Its nine project parts are collaboratively conducting research on the variation and change of the German language in Austria. The SFB explores the use and the subjective perception of the German language in Austria as well as its contact with other languages. Methodologically and theoretically, most SFB project parts are situated within variationist linguistics, others in contact linguistics and perceptionist linguistics. This paper gives an insight into the conception of a framework for the annotation and ultimately also classification of language varieties, which is being developed within the SFB. It outlines the requirements of the various project parts and reviews, whether and how standardised language codes (ISO 639) and language tags (following BCP 47) can be utilised for the annotation of language varieties in variationist linguistic projects.
38
Sagyndykuly, B., and A. А. Adamova. "Interdisciplinary nature of scientific maxims of Kazakh linguists (early twentieth century)." Altaistics, no. 4 (January 1, 2024): 5–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.25587/2782-662-2023-4-5-15.
Full textAbstract:
Linguistics is one of the social sciences and studies the various characteristics and functions of language. Various features of the internal system of language are also studied in relation to linguistics. At the same time, linguistic knowledge develops and changes under the influence of external social phenomena. The authors of the article are convinced of this property of language by applying natural science teachings to the object. This can be argued as a conflictological aspect of linguistics. This means that the conflictological aspect can prove the relevance of the article. The purpose of the article is to differentiate the scientific conclusions of the first Kazakh linguists of a linguobiological nature. This goal requires the solution of at least two tasks: 1) introduces the first Kazakh linguists to the common Eurasian scientific environment and disseminates their scientific and pedagogical works; 2) obliges to solve general interscientific relations through the relations of man and language, language and biology, language and speech, language and thinking. The first scientific works of the first Kazakh scientists are considered as the methodology of the article. In particular, the scientific principles of A. Baitursynuly, K. Zhubanuly, S. Amanzholuly were in the spotlight. Given specific examples and facts related to Turkic languages (Kazakh, Chuvash, Yakut) were given. In addition, materials from the dictionary of the Kazakh literary language and information from Wikipedia provided a lot of methodological information. The article is based on the methods of historical comparison, scientific analysis, analysis and collection. The main results of the article are reflected in the connection between linguistics and natural science. Likewise, the problems of paleontology and pathopsycholinguistics, presented in a small volume, make researchers think and lead to the study of general scientific research in this direction.
39
Reed, Paul E., and Melissa M. Baese-Berk. "Addressing diversity in speech science curricula." Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 153, no. 3_supplement (March 1, 2023): A210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/10.0018682.
Full textAbstract:
A fundamental understanding of speech science is a critically important component in fields such as linguistics, communication disorders and sciences, cognitive science, and speech technology. Therefore, courses in speech communication are integral to the undergraduate and graduate curricula of these and other subjects. Despite being at the forefront of pedagogical innovations, speech science courses have lagged in representing cultural and linguistic diversity in the classroom. Many speech scientists understand that linguistic diversity is fundamental to human language systems. However, discussions of language variation tend to be relegated to a single section within a course. The lack of inclusion of diverse language varieties results in a lack of engagement with many social variables such as race, ethnicity, and gender identity, among others. We argue that this “status quo” in speech science courses must change, such that linguistic diversity must be addressed in and throughout all courses, even those where diversity is not the focus. We will present concerns with current approaches to teaching about cultural and linguistic diversity. Furthermore, we will explain the benefits of including diversity instruction throughout the curriculum. Finally, we present specific recommendations for instructors to incorporate teaching of linguistic diversity throughout their curriculum and speech science courses.
40
Nilufar Ilkhamovna Nurmatova. "Linguistic Features of Studying The Theory of Deixis in Linguistics." Journal of Advanced Zoology 44, S6 (December 10, 2023): 1781–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.17762/jaz.v44is6.2617.
Full textAbstract:
The article deals with the problem of study of the theory of deixis in a literary text. Besides that it has its own linguistic characteristics due to the fact that the author uses various ways of indicating objects in the real world, which can be both concrete and abstract. The study of the theory of deixis in quotation of a literary text requires careful consideration of various contextual authorial and linguistic factors that influence the use and meaning of deictic expression in the literary text. The investigation employs a multidisciplinary approach, drawing on insights from linguistics, semiotics, and cognitive science to unravel the complexities of deixis. It investigates how deixis operates across different languages and cultures, shedding light on universal principles and language-specific variations. The study also explores the pragmatic functions of deixis in communication, elucidating how speakers utilize deictic expressions to convey reference, spatial relations, and temporal distinctions. Additionally, the research delves into the cognitive aspects of deixis, examining how individuals process and interpret deictic elements in real-time communication. It addresses the challenges posed by deixis in cross-cultural communication and explores strategies for resolving potential misunderstandings arising from contextual dependencies. The linguistic features under scrutiny include personal, spatial, and temporal deixis, as well as the distinctions between deixis in spoken and written discourse. The study incorporates both theoretical analyses and practical applications, offering valuable insights for linguists, language educators, and communication scholars.
41
Chen, Weiying. "The Development of Linguistics in China." Historiographia Linguistica 44, no. 1 (July 21, 2017): 1–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/hl.44.1.01che.
Full textAbstract:
Summary Prompted by Western science in late 19th century, Chinese linguistics gradually moved to a new direction after two thousand years of philological tradition centered on rhetoric and textual exegesis. Through the intense efforts of a few scholars in the early twenti-eth century, linguistic study in China became a science and a discipline. Yuen Ren Chao (1892–1982) and Wang Li (1900–1986) were first-generation linguists who led the movement to apply the methodology of modern linguistics to the systematic study of Chinese. This paper investigates the trend setting achievements of these founders of the discipline, and it introduces their biographical and scholarly backgrounds. It also provides a brief history of philology through the lens of Wang Li who was the first historian of Chinese linguistics. Contemporary linguists need both a critical mind to understand the philological legacy of Chinese and an open mind to welcome new interdisciplinary approaches that could produce innovative theories and facilitate the growth of the discipline. Moreover, this paper expands the history of linguistics by introducing linguistic features not found in Indo-European languages, thereby making the history of linguistics more inclusive than it has previously been. Consequently, this paper contributes to a rethinking of the definition of language.
42
Potyakailo, Sergei Aleksandrovich. "Bibliometric analysis of research paradigms in linguistics." Litera, no. 6 (June 2022): 129–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.25136/2409-8698.2022.6.38210.
Full textAbstract:
The paper discusses issues related to the bibliometric analysis of current linguistic paradigms in the framework of scientific specialties 10.02.19 – Theory of Language and 10.02.04 – Germanic languages for the period from 2000 to 2020. The subject of the study is the patterns, trends and prospects for the development of current linguistic paradigms. The purpose of the work is to analyze dissertation research of scientific specialties 10.02.04 – Germanic languages and 10.02.19 – Language theory selected using structural bibliometry methods, as well as to identify promising areas for the development of the science of linguistics. In the course of the study, it was possible to substantiate the structure of the transition from one linguistic paradigm to another. Due to the permanently decreasing relevance and the need to study topics identified by keywords defining current linguistic paradigms, as well as the constant regression in publication activity, a crisis is brewing in science, according to which scientists partially or fully cannot substantiate the existing problems, the so-called anomalies, within the framework of the paradigm under study. An undoubted marker of the future bifurcation point, the moment when quantitative will turn into qualitative, is the level of research publications that dropped below the level of 2000 in 2020. The stages of T. Kuhn's theory can be traced throughout the 20s, and the data obtained by bibliometric analysis indicate a crisis in linguistic research.
43
Normurodovna, Torakulova Oysulton. "FORMATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF MEDICAL TERMS IN LINGUISTICS: THE EXAMPLE OF CLASSICAL LANGUAGES." American Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovations and Research 05, no. 05 (May 1, 2023): 4–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.37547/tajiir/volume05issue05-02.
Full textAbstract:
Every science develops and improves with time. The development of the science of Latin language and medical terminology in the field of medicine is related to medical sciences. The names of medical news, diseases, and drugs have been given in Latin-Greek for centuries and will remain so. It is not for nothing that Latin is recognized as the international medical language. This will further help medical scientists to work together.
44
Dedinkin, A. L. "Legal Discourse as a Multi-Dimensional Integrated Phenomenon and Legal Linguistics as a Syncretic Science." Bulletin of Kemerovo State University 23, no. 1 (April 10, 2021): 220–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2021-23-1-220-228.
Full textAbstract:
The article introduces legal discourse as part of a complex communicative activity. It is an integrative interdisciplinary phenomenon on the border of jurisprudence and linguistics. The research objective was to establish the constituent parts of legal discourse, which includes legal texts, related scientific literature, and other documents. Legal linguistics is a generalizing discipline that studies the interaction of language and law. The line between legal discourse and other discourses is hard to define. Legal discourse is characterized by unified subjects, procedures, circumstances, and impersonality, that is, the absence of recipient and sender, hence the abundance of impersonal verb forms and impersonal constructions. Legal texts are devoid of national marks, and the vocabulary has equivalents in other languages. The present research was the first to designate a set of texts that make up legal discourse, i.e. texts of laws, decrees, scientific literature on legal matters, various legal documents, judicial texts, texts of interrogations, court speeches, expert opinion, etc. Although legal discourse and legal linguistics have different subjects and tasks, they share the same object, i.e. the interaction of language and law. Legal linguistics is an integrative science based on linguistics and legal theory, which uses achievements of philosophy, psychology, sociology, ethics, cognitive linguistics, pragmalinguistics, linguistic conflictology, etc.
45
van Naerssen, Margaret, and Robert B. Kaplan. "Language and Science." Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 7 (March 1986): 86–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0267190500001677.
Full textAbstract:
Teaching English [or any language] as a medium for science and technologymust involve us in the teaching of how scientists and technologistsuse the system of language to communicate, and not just what linguistic elements are most commonly used (1979:12–23).In this comment, he implies the definition of the problem underlying any discussion of “language and science.” Such a discussion must deal with the language(s) used to communicate science, with the varieties scientists use to communicate with each other, and with the ways in which those varieties (as differentiated from the “general variety” of the language) may be taught to someone else. These different issues assume quite different underlying questions. This brief review will try to address some of the complex questions involved.
46
Falk, Julia S. "Turn to the history of linguistics." Historiographia Linguistica 30, no. 1-2 (September 16, 2003): 129–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/hl.30.1.05fal.
Full textAbstract:
Summary In the 1940s and 1950s, the leading proponents of American synchronic linguistics showed little interest in the history of linguistics. Some attention to historiography occurred in subfields of linguistics closest to the humanities – linguistic anthropology, historical linguistics, modern European languages – but the ‘science of language’ developed by Leonard Bloomfield and his descriptivist followers demanded autonomy from other disciplines and from the past. Increasing American contact with European linguistics during the 1950s culminated in the 1962 Ninth International Congress of Linguists in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Here Noam Chomsky presented a plenary session paper that appeared in print in four versions between 1962 and 1964, each version incorporating an increasing amount of discussion of the early 20th-century precursors to the descriptivists and a number of 17th- and 19th-century studies of language and mind. Charles Hockett responded by organizing his 1964 presidential address to the Linguistic Society of America as a history of linguistics, emphasizing periods, figures, and ideas not included in Chomsky’s work. Historiographers of the time recognized a surge of American interest in the history of linguistics beginning in the early 1960s and most attributed it largely to Chomsky’s work. Historiographic publication increased significantly among the descriptivists; at the same time it emerged among the generativists, most of whom followed Chomsky in exploring pre-20th-century philosophical ideas or reconsidering concepts and practices of the descriptivists’ forerunners. The resulting visibility and impetus to the history of linguistics contributed to the foundation upon which linguistic historiography matured in North America in the later decades of the 20th century.
47
Dorofeev, Yury V., and Evgenia A. Zhuravleva. "Functional paradigm in Russian studies: from the functioning of units to the regulatory concept of language." Russian Language Studies 21, no. 1 (March 30, 2023): 49–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/2618-8163-2023-21-1-49-63.
Full textAbstract:
Today the Russian language has gone beyond Russia and forms the planetary Russian-speaking world, so Russian language studies, whose subject matter is traditionally considered the literary form of the language, seeks to reach a new level of comprehension of both the language and individual facts. The relevance of the study is due to the fact that at the present stage ideas of synthesis come to the fore in linguistics, there are tendencies to develop a theory of language integrating the latest achievements of different areas of linguistics on a single basis. In accordance with this, the aim of the research is to compare the regulative concept of language in the works of A.N. Rudyakov with the works of other linguists in order to establish the key features and principles of a new linguistic paradigm and define language as a regulatory system based on linguistic functionalism. Deductive, analytical-theoretical and modeling methods describe the current state of the scientific linguistic paradigm and general linguistic problems associated with the concepts under study. The key features of the modern scientific linguistic paradigm are established, since without defining theoretical guidelines, modern language science loses its practical value. As a result, the authors substantiated that the new paradigm is not only an appeal to new material and new research methods, but the creation of a fundamentally new theory that will take into account the role of language in society, its ontological, functional essence. Based on the definition of the key features of the functional approach to the language and its units, the authors demonstrate that linguistics not only borders on other sciences, but is in some way an integral part of them, the basis of the human Universe. In the future, the presented material allows us to see that the change of the scientific paradigm, despite the objective difficulties, today is a prerequisite for the further development of linguistics. It also outlines a range of theoretical and practical tasks that modern linguistics faces and which can be solved within the framework of a new paradigm.
48
Aroshidze, Marine, and Nino Aroshidze. "Language of Science – Language of Translation." Balkanistic Forum 29, no. 3 (November 1, 2020): 286–305. http://dx.doi.org/10.37708/bf.swu.v29i3.15.
Full textAbstract:
Modern civilisation processes, which are closely interrelated with cultural and linguistic globalisation, have entered the era of the noosphere; humanity is encountering these problems at present, the solution to which requires joint efforts and a high level of knowledge about globalisation. However, for a constructive dialogue amongst all nationalities within the framework of the world community and the achievement of a "knowledge society", it is necessary to understand the functioning of a world language, the peculiarities of intercultural communication, the originality of national ideas of the world, and the ideological concepts conveyed in natural languages; thus, the language of science and of scientific thinking is of particular importance in terms of the target language.The choice of the language of science, which must fulfil all the functions assigned to it, is determined by a complex socio-political conditions; otherwise, we would have an intermediary language, a translation language, or a language of cognitive thinking. A review of the change in the languages of science in the post-Soviet space (in the example of Georgia) allows us to assert that only the harmonious development of a global language within the national languages of science can provide a multifaceted reflection of reality and the dynamism of the development of science.
49
Semenova, Zh. "Influence of New Trends in Kyrgyz Language Studies." Bulletin of Science and Practice, no. 3 (March 15, 2023): 501–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/88/69.
Full textAbstract:
This article is devoted to the problem of expansionism, which, influencing the subject-content environment of the language, covers the extralinguistic side. This approach allows you to explore the field of linguistics as a multifaceted and heterogeneous industry. Modern linguistics allows you to explore the language, taking into account the influence of the human factor, since anthropocentrism contributes to the emergence of new directions in linguistics. We know that “new” views on the language are beginning to take root in modern Kyrgyz linguistics. Like general linguistics, Kyrgyz linguistics is freely integrated with other sciences, for example, cognitive linguistics already has a strong place in Kyrgyz linguistics. If cognitive linguistics, gender, political linguistics, pragmalinguistics, cultural linguistics, ethnolinguistics, legal linguistics and other similar areas are not new in Russian linguistics, then in Kyrgyz linguistics they have become the basis for the emergence of new theories and concepts. The variety of new directions in linguistics allows us to analyze the language in a new way, since new directions in linguistics appear on the basis of public interest. The change in attitude to language is due to its ontological properties in relation to the linguistic society and linguistic personality that take place in life. Thus, the article gives a brief description of the formation and development of new directions in general linguistics, as well as the influence in Kyrgyz linguistics.
50
Perdana Prasetya, Eska, Anita Dewi Ekawati, Deni Sapta Nugraha, Ahmad Marzuq, and Tiara Saputri Darlis. "CORPUS LINGUISTICS, LANGUAGE CORPORA AND LANGUAGE TEACHING." ENGLISH JOURNAL 14, no. 2 (September 17, 2020): 75. http://dx.doi.org/10.32832/english.v14i2.3845.
Full textAbstract:
<span lang="EN-GB">This research is about Corpus Linguistics, Language Corpora, And Language Teaching. As we know about this science is relatively new and is associated with technology. There are several areas discussed in this study such as several important parts of the corpus, the information generated in the corpus, four main characteristics of the corpus, Types of Corpora, Corpora in Language Teaching, several types that could be related to corpus research, Applications of corpus linguistics to language teaching may be direct or indirect. The field of applied linguistics analyses large collections of written and spoken texts, which have been carefully designed to represent specific domains of language use, such as informal speech or academic writing.</span>