To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Scopus citation index.
Journal articles on the topic 'Scopus citation index'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Scopus citation index.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
Repiso, Rafael, Evaristo Jiménez-Contreras, and Ignacio Aguaded. "Revistas Iberoamericanas de Educación en SciELO Citation Index y Emerging Source Citation Index." Revista española de Documentación Científica 40, no. 4 (November 22, 2017): 186. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/redc.2017.4.1445.
Full textAbstract:
El presente trabajo es un análisis de las revistas de Educación iberoamericanas en SciELO Citation Index y Emerging Source Citation Index, dos de los nuevos productos incorporados a Web of Science. Para ello se analizan las revistas de Educación iberoamericanas presentes en estos productos, por separado y conjuntamente. Se compara su cobertura con otras bases de datos externas referentes (Scopus, Redalyc, Google Scholar Metrics and, Social Sciences Citation Index) así como la presencia de las revistas estudiadas en otras bases de datos. Igualmente se analizan características de las revistas como la representatividad por países, la tipología editorial, periodicidad de las cabeceras, antigüedad y la producción medida en artículos. En definitiva, Web of Science demuestra cubrir mejor el área de Educación Iberoamericana que su rival Scopus.
2
Giri, Rabishankar. "Influence of selected factors in journals’ citations." Aslib Journal of Information Management 71, no. 1 (January 21, 2019): 90–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ajim-07-2017-0170.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the influence of selected factors in journal citations. Various factors can affect citations distribution of journals. Among them, skewness of citations distribution, author self-citation, journal self-citation and recitations (RCs) have been studied. Design/methodology/approach The present study based on 16 systematically selected journals indexed in Scopus under the subject category “Library and Information Science.” The study was confined to original research and review articles that were published in the selected journals in the year 2011. The temporal citation window from 2011 to 2014 was taken for analysis. Tools like, Scopus author ID, ORCID and author profiles from Google Scholar were used to minimize the error due to homonyms, spelling variances and misspelling in authors’ names. Findings It is found that citations distribution in majority of the journals under the study is highly skewed and more likely to follow log-normal distribution. The nature of authorship in papers was found to have positive effect on citation counts. Self-citing data show that higher ranked journals have rather less direct impact on total citation counts than their lower counterpart. RCs are also found to be more in top-tier journals. Though the influence of self-citations and RCs were relatively less at individual level on total citations of journals but combined, they can play a dominant role and can affect total citation counts of journals at significant level. Research limitations/implications The present study is based on Scopus database only. Therefore, citation data can be affected by the inherent limitation of Scopus. Readers are encouraged to further the study by taking into account large sample and tracing citations from an array of citation indexes, such as Web of Science, Google citations, Indian Citation Index, etc. Originality/value This paper reinforces that the citations received by journals can be affected by the factors selected in this study. Therefore, the study provides better understanding of the role of these selected factors in journal citations.
3
Sankar, M. "Mapping of Research in Agricultural Scientist’s Citation Analysis in Google Scholar, Scopus and Publons." Asian Journal of Information Science and Technology 9, no. 2 (May 5, 2019): 28–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.51983/ajist-2019.9.2.282.
Full textAbstract:
An innovative idea developed by the researchers should reach the end user groups. The output of any researcher can be judged in terms of patents or his publications in the respective fields. Quality and impact of research work can be based on the citation and h index. Nowadays, there are several parameters considered for evaluating the performance of the research. Citation and h index are the quality parameters used for rating the originality and use of research. They are more useful for accessing the potentials of research as well as for providing a platform for collaborative projects at national / International levels. This paper presents the comparative analysis of citation and h index for identified researcher through three popular databases viz., Google Scholar, Scopus, and Publons. Among the three databases, Google Scholar showed a higher number of citations of the selected author due to data collected from unauthenticated documents as well as well established research databases.
4
Araújo, Paula Carina de, Renata Cristina Gutierres, and Birger Hjørland. "Citation Indexing and Indexes." KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION 48, no. 1 (2021): 72–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2021-1-72.
Full textAbstract:
A citation index is a bibliographic database that provides citation links between documents. The first modern citation index was suggested by the researcher Eugene Garfield in 1955 and created by him in 1964, and it represents an important innovation to knowledge organization and information retrieval. This article describes citation indexes in general, considering the modern citation indexes, including Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Crossref, Dimensions and some special citation indexes and predecessors to the modern citation index like Shepard’s Citations. We present comparative studies of the major ones and survey theoretical problems related to the role of citation indexes as subject access points (SAP), recognizing the implications to knowledge organization and information retrieval. Finally, studies on citation behavior are presented and the influence of citation indexes on knowledge organization, information retrieval and the scientific information ecosystem is recognized.
5
Kaliyadan, Feroze, and Karalikkattil T. Ashique. "Citation indices." Journal of Skin and Sexually Transmitted Diseases 2 (April 17, 2020): 2–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/jsstd_7_2020.
Full textAbstract:
Impact of research is generally measured through citation counts. For author impact, the most common impact indices considered are the h-index, i10-index, and the g-index, of which the h-index is the most commonly used. There are various resources available for retrieving researcher h-indices. The most common databases used for the same are Scopus, Google Scholar, and “Web of Science.” Ethical issues related to the use of these resources for h-index calculation include – gaming/manipulation and fake citations. An issue which we have noticed cropping up of late, is researchers claiming erroneous h-indices.
6
Nasibi-Sis, Hamed, Saeideh Valizadeh-Haghi, and Maryam Shekofteh. "ResearchGate Altmetric scores and Scopus bibliometric indicators among lecturers." Performance Measurement and Metrics 22, no. 1 (November 13, 2020): 15–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/pmm-04-2020-0020.
Full textAbstract:
PurposeMany researchers in ResearchGate (RG) engage in scholarly activity and share research findings. The researchers' activities in this social network may increase the probability of their works being cited. Thus, this study aims to examine the status of RG indices and the Scopus citation indicators of the allied medical sciences lecturers and their association with their academic rankings.Design/methodology/approachA cross-sectional, descriptive analytical study was performed. As a first step, the names of all 50 lecturers at the School of Allied Medical Sciences were searched through RG to find all the lecturers with profiles. Then, the h-index as well as the number of citations by them were extracted from Scopus. Spearman's correlation coefficient test was performed to explore the association of the RG score with the Scopus citation indicators and the academic rankings of the lecturers.FindingsThe findings demonstrated that there is a statistically significant relationship between the RG indices (except the question and answer indices) and the Scopus citation indicators with the academic rankings of the lecturers (p-value < 0.01).Originality/valueKnowledge of the significant relationship between the RG indices and the Scopus citation indicators may encourage the lecturers to make more efforts to be active on RG. Furthermore, policymakers can encourage their researchers and lecturers to be more active in this scientific social network, which could lead to promoting the university rankings in the global and national rankings systems.
7
James, Chris, Lisa Colledge, Wim Meester, Norman Azoulay, and Andrew Plume. "CiteScore metrics: Creating journal metrics from the Scopus citation index." Learned Publishing 32, no. 4 (June 19, 2019): 367–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/leap.1246.
Full text
8
S., Vijayalakshmi. "AWARENESS ON INDIAN CITATION INDEX AMONG INDIAN RESEARCHERS." International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH 8, no. 5 (May 27, 2020): 89–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v8.i5.2020.74.
Full textAbstract:
Indexing is the quality parameter and reflection of the higher quality of the journal. Indexing is a process in which indexes are created in order to maintain the records so that the researchers can reach the requisite particular record easily. SCi, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Indian Citation Index are some indexing agencies. Among this Indian Citation Index is functioning from India, it is a new web platform for measuring performance of Indian research periodically. Most of the researchers aim and dream is to publish their work in recognised and quality journal, in this regard to quality of indexing Indian citation Index play vital role in the context of Indian research. The awareness on Scopus, Google scholar are more predominate among scholars whereas the awareness Indian Citation Index is to be studied, Hence, the author chosen the awareness on Indian Citation Index among Indian researchers to study by following survey method. This paper discusses the aspects of awareness among Indian researchers.
9
Ball, Rafael, and Dirk Tunger. "Science indicators revisited – Science Citation Index versus SCOPUS: A bibliometric comparison of both citation databases." Information Services & Use 26, no. 4 (February 1, 2007): 293–301. http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/isu-2006-26404.
Full text
10
Demidov, Dmitri. "Bibliometric assessment of national library information journals." Scientific and Technical Libraries, no. 8 (August 1, 2017): 3–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2017-8-3-17.
Full textAbstract:
Findings of the bibliometric analysis of national library and information journals are highlighted. The range of publications for comparative analysis is reviewed. The key bibliometric indicators for journals assessment are defined; the choice of the data source, namely RSCI database is substantiated. Among the indicators selected for analysis are: number of publications and citations, two-year impact factor, 5-year impact factor, five-year self-citation coefficient, 5-year Herfindahl index - by citation journals and by author’s institutions. On the basis of average factors, the citation dynamics for 2013 - 2015 is determined. Other factors of journals’ authority are also discussed: Inclusion into the HAC (Highest Attestation Commission), world abstract databases and Web of Science and Scopus citation systems.
11
Sharipova, V. D. "RESEARCH OF SCIENTIFIC MEASURES IN THE FIELD OF DATA GOVERNANCE BASED ON PUBLICATION ACTIVITY IN THE RUSSIAN SCIENTIFIC CITATION INDEX AND SCOPUS." System analysis and logistics 2, no. 28 (June 1, 2021): 15–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.31799/2077-5687-2021-2-15-19.
Full textAbstract:
The article presents an analysis of publication activity in the field of data governance based on the Russian Science Citation Index and Scopus database. This area is relevant in application for leaders of digital transformation, for whom it is important to form a data infrastructure, support their error-free, unambiguous, and introduce definitions of terms. The paper presents a retrospective analysis of the intensity of publication and presents the authors and titles of articles with the highest citations. Key words: data governance, analysis of publications, Scopus, database, digital transformation.
12
Yoon, Byung-Ho, Bo Kwon Hwang, Eun-Ae Jung, and Deog-Yoon Kim. "Citation Analysis of the Journal of Bone Metabolism from Korean Citation Index, Web of Science, and Scopus." Journal of Bone Metabolism 28, no. 3 (August 31, 2021): 193–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.11005/jbm.2021.28.3.193.
Full textAbstract:
Background: Nine years have passed since the Journal of Bone Metabolism (JBM) was launched as an English journal in 2012; it was finally included in Scopus in January 2019. Therefore, this study aimed to provide evidence of increased international recognition based on journal metrics and reflect on its efforts to be recognized as a top-notch journal.Methods: Databases, such as the Web of Science (WoS), Scopus, Korean Citation Index (KCI), and citation indicators, including the impact factor (IF) and SCImago journal rank (SJR) were reviewed and calculated according to years, and the results were drawn. Furthermore, country-wise contributions and top-cited articles were also investigated.Results: The JBM 2020 IF was 2.17 in the WoS. The 2020 SJR in Scopus was 0.334, with a ranking of 165/219 (75.3%) in the Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism category. The 2020 KCI was 0.42. Of 263 articles, 260 were citable (98.9%), and of 176 original articles, 15 (8.5%) were supported by research grants. The total citation of JBM has increased from 16 in 2014 to 141 in 2020; however, its KCI remained stationary from 0.29 in 2015 to 0.42 in 2020.Conclusions: Currently, JBM is increasingly cited by international researchers than Korean researchers, indicating that the journal’s content is valued at an international level. Its inclusion in PubMed Central appears to have increased its international relevance; however, publishing English-only articles may hinder its use domestically. Therefore, efforts should be made to increase citation rates and enhance domestic readership.
13
Shrivastava, Rishabh, and Preeti Mahajan. "Relationship between citation counts and Mendeley readership metrics." New Library World 117, no. 3/4 (March 14, 2016): 229–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/nlw-09-2015-0064.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose – Social media has given way for the development of various new altmetric indicators. Mendeley readership count is one such indicator. The purpose of this paper is twofold. First, the paper aims to investigate the relationship between citation counts and Mendeley readership counts. The paper also evaluates the relationship between Mendeley readership metrics for two different time periods, thereby investigating its nature as an altmetric indicator. Design/methodology/approach – Data were collected using the Scopus database. Top 100 papers in Physics published during 2005 as well as in 2010 that received the largest number of citations were selected. Mendeley readership data were collected using Mendeley readership statistics for documents indexed in Scopus. For establishing a relationship between citation counts and Mendeley readership, correlation was calculated between the citations in Scopus database and Mendeley readership. The difference in Mendeley readership for different time periods was also investigated. Findings – The paper showed that for both the years, Mendeley readership counts were in positive correlation with citation counts. For the year 2010, it was found that Mendeley readership counts were in strong positive correlation with citation counts, whereas for 2005, they were in moderate positive correlation. Research limitations/implications – One of the limitations of this paper is that with time more scientists and researchers may join Mendeley causing various changes in data and giving different results. Also, the paper has focused on the highly cited papers in Physics. Originality/value – Very few studies have been conducted in the area of altmetrics, as it is a comparatively new and emerging field of research. The findings of this paper offer insights to the question whether Mendeley readership counts can be used as an alternative to traditional sources of bibliometric indicators like citations, h-index, etc. The paper also evaluates the difference in the nature of traditional bibliometric indicators and Mendeley readership counts.
14
Radha, L. "Research Output of Thiagarajar College of Engineering, Madurai during 2014- 2018: A Scientometric Analysis using Excel Sheet." Shanlax International Journal of Arts, Science and Humanities 8, no. 2 (October 1, 2020): 97–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.34293/sijash.v8i2.3337.
Full textAbstract:
This study examined the research publications of the faculty of Thiagarajar College of Engineering (TCE), Madurai, Tamilnadu, India. Data for this study have been collected from the Scopus and web of science databases for 2014-2018. Among 1270 papers published and indexed in the Scopus for five years and 437 papers published and indexed in the web of science. This paper shows how to use an excel sheet for calculating the h-index, i-10 index, average citation per year, cited rate, percentage of cited and non-cited paper, real average citation, etc.… Apart from the above analysis, this paper finds the overlap publications of Scopus and Web of Science.
15
Sutikno, Tole, Herman Yuliansyah, and Lina Handayani. "A Simple Way to Maintain the Top 50 Ranking Scientists in the SINTA from Excessive Self-Citations." Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics 7, no. 4 (December 1, 2018): 673–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.11591/eei.v7i4.674.
Full textAbstract:
Top 50 authors in the Science and Technology Index (SINTA) is become popular as Indonesian top 50 ranking scientists to measure both the productivity and quality of the publications. Unfortunately, to get a high ranking in SINTA, some authors are strongly indicated that they do instant and unfair ways through citation cartels or self-citation. Based on manual investigation, excessive self-citations are conducted through publication in international conference. This paper proposed a simple way to drop abuse of excessive self-citations by categorized research articles as main publication and others as secondary publication based on Scopus database. This method is proposed to avoid perverse and unintended effects on the direction of research and publication in Indonesia.
16
Mukundan, Ramina, and Nikesh Narayanan. "Research performance of Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi." Performance Measurement and Metrics 21, no. 1 (November 13, 2019): 52–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/pmm-06-2019-0022.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose Khalifa University of Science and Technology (KU) is one of the prominent Universities in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), of the Government of Abu Dhabi. The new Khalifa University was re-constituted in the year 2017 by merging three higher education institutions in Abu Dhabi, the Masdar Institute of Science and Technology, Khalifa University of Science, Technology and Research and the Petroleum Institute. The objectives of these institutions and their research areas were entirely disparate in the pre-merger era and hence the evaluation of the research performance of its pre-merged entities in the past is vital for Khalifa University to plan for the future course of actions. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach This study analyzes and visualizes scholarly publications of Khalifa University of Science and Technology (KU) using SCOPUS data. There are various qualitative and quantitative methods to measure research performance. This study adopted citation analysis, one of the widely recognized quantitative metrics to measure the citation impact of scholarly publications. Findings Khalifa University leads in productivity compared to other UAE universities but the citation impact of its publications is less in comparison to United Arab Emirates University and New York University, Abu Dhabi in terms of citations per publication. The majority of KU publications are not highly cited. The majority of the KU publications (80 percent) received fewer citations and few papers (20 percent of the KU publications) attracted 80 percent of the total citations received for KU publications. Analysis results indicate that publishing in top-ranked journals would improve the chance of getting more citations. On average, eight percentage difference is seen in the h-index of KU authors when removing self-citations. Research limitations/implications The study considered only publications that are indexed in SCOPUS. It covered a limited set of sources as per the SCOPUS editorial policy. Most of the covered sources are journals and conference proceedings. Books’ data coverage in Citation Index is comparatively low, which may affect results regarding social sciences and humanities publications because book publication is more prominent in these subject areas. Khalifa University is a science and technology university, and the majority of its academic departments fall in science and technology domains. Even though there are few arts and humanities departments in the University, it will not affect the overall findings of the results of the analysis. Originality/value This study is original research conducted to study the impact of research publications of Khalifa University using Scopus data.
17
Sujon, Mamun Khan, Siti Noor Fazliah Mohd Noor, Muhammad Azrul Bin Zabidi, Khairul Anuar Shariff, and Mohammad Khursheed Alam. "Bibliometric profiles of top 50 most cited articles on bioactive glass." Biomedical Glasses 6, no. 1 (December 31, 2020): 70–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bglass-2020-0007.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractCitation analysis of a certain publication acknowledges its impact on the scientific community. This study conducted a multivariate analysis of the top 50 most cited articles published on the field of Bioactive Glass. A systemic search was performed using the “All database” section of the Web of Science to retrieve the top 50 most cited original publications. The selected articles were then manually cross-matched with Elsevier Scopus and Google Scholar Database. Parameters such as article title, authorship, institution, country of publication, year, citation count, citation density, current citation index, and journal name were retrieved from Web of Science. Different ranges of citation numbers were retrieved for these publications in which 197-913 are from Web of Science, 209-962 are from Elsevier Scopus, and 269-1225 are from Google Scholar. A total of 153 authors contributed to this marked list, where Professor L.L. Hench contributed the highest number of articles (n=21). Imperial College London published the highest number of articles (n=21). In summary, this study provides a good scientometric picture of bioactive glass related publications, which illustrate the trend of biomaterials development over the years and suggests future scopes to the scientific community.
18
Rochim, Adian Fatchur, Abdul Muis, and Riri Fitri Sari. "Improving Fairness of H-index: RA-index." DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology 38, no. 6 (November 2, 2018): 378. http://dx.doi.org/10.14429/djlit.38.6.12937.
Full textAbstract:
<div class="page" title="Page 1"><div class="layoutArea"><div class="column"><p><span>H-index has been widely used as one of the bibliometric measurement methods for researchers’ performance. </span><span>On the other hand, H-index has been unfair for figuring authors that have high number of citations but fewer number </span><span>of papers (perfectionist researcher) and researchers that have many papers but fewer citations (productive researcher). The main objective of this article is to improve H-index for accommodating and calculating perfectionist and productive researchers’ impact based on Jain’s Fairness Index algorithm and Lotka’s Law. For improving H-index by RA-index is proposed. To prove the proposed a method, 1,710 citation data sets of top cited researchers from Scopus based on author names list from Webometrics site are used. Fairness index of the RA-index has the average of 91 per cent, which is higher than the fairness of H-Index 80 per cent has been found. </span></p></div></div></div>
19
C. Calver, M., and K. A. Bryant. "Pacific Conservation Biology: an authorship and citation analysis." Pacific Conservation Biology 14, no. 4 (2008): 285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/pc080285.
Full textAbstract:
We analysed Pacific Conservation Biology?s authorship and readership from 1993?2007 to quantify who publishes in the journal, who cites the journal, how the journal compares to other conservation journals and whether there are trends in authorship and useage over time. Authors came from Australia (73%, represented in 15 of 15 years), the Americas (Canada, USA and South American countries) (12%, represented in 13 of 15 years), New Zealand (8%, represented in 14 of 15 years), other Pacific and Asian countries (4%, represented in 11 of 15 years) and Europe (2%, represented in 11 of 15 years). Overall, 46% of authors were academics. Using the Scopus database in April 2008 and the cited reference feature in the ISI Web of Science in July 2008, =84% papers published each year between 1993 and 2001 were cited at least once in each database, declining to under 19% in 2007 because articles had far less time to accrue citations. Using the cited reference feature in the ISI Web of Science database in July 2008, authors citing Pacific Conservation Biology came from Australia and 82 other countries. Compared to 24 journals listed in Thomson Reuters? ?Biodiversity Conservation? category in 2008, Pacific Conservation Biology ranked between the 10th and 39th percentiles for a range of citation statistics derived from both Scopus and ISI Web of Science, including: Journal Impact Factor (JIF) for 2006, mean JIF for 2001?2006 and h-index, g-index, mean citations/paper and median citations/paper for 2000?2006. Overall, most authors are Australian, but with consistent international representation and academic and non-academic authors. With time, most papers are cited (including many international citations) and citation statistics are within the range of similar journals abstracted in ISI Web of Science. On the basis of the results, we offer suggestions for increasing Pacific Conservation Biology?s use and a critique of the growing tendency to accept citation-based bibliometric data as indicators of the quality or achievements of journals and individual scientists.
20
Berhidi, Anna, Péter Szluka, and Lívia Vasas. "Az Orvosi Hetilap idézetelemzése mutatószámok alapján 2012 és 2016 között." Orvosi Hetilap 159, no. 30 (July 2018): 1226–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/650.2018.31104.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract: Introduction: After getting indexed by scientific databases – Web of Science, Journal Citation Reports – the obtained scientific performance of the journal needs to be kept up. Aim: The aim of this article is to analyse citation numbers based on different bibliometric indicators between 2012 and 2016 comparing data with an article published in 2012. Method: Authors evaluated issues of Orvosi Hetilap published in 2013–2015 and searched data in various international databases. Number of citations, quality of citing journals were analysed based on the official 2015–2016 impact factor of Orvosi Hetilap. Scientific performance of the journal was evaluated according to data of SCImago webpage and Scopus database as well. Results: The official 2016 impact factor of Orvosi Hetilap is 0,349 which is the highest value compared with the previous factors. The articles of Orvosi Hetilap are cited by international authors and high impact factor journals, too. Further, more than half of the publications cited are open access. The most frequently cited categories are original and review articles, and case reports. Scientific performance of Orvosi Hetilap is promising according to indicators of SCImago webpage and Scopus database. Mean self-citation rate of the journal is about 30%. Its h-index is 7 in Web of Science Core Collection, and 19 in Scopus database. Conclusions: Citation analysis of this article shows that citation numbers and various bibliometric indicators can increase in a short period, but drastic changes can only happen in a long period with keeping and pushing the obtained values, and focusing on the further development of the journal. Orv Hetil. 2018; 159(30): 1226–1234.
21
Torgalo, E., S. Vakal, and L. Ostapchenko. "Scientometric databases and integration of Ukrainian biological journals into common information space." Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Series: Biology 68, no. 3 (2014): 5–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.17721/1728_2748.2014.68.5-11.
Full textAbstract:
The most well-known citation indices and scientometric databases are reviewed in the article. Among them are Web of Knowledge, Scopus, Index Copernicus, GoogleScholar, Russian Science Citation Index. Basic concepts of calculation, as well as differences between most widely used scientometric values (IF, h-index, SJR, SNIP, ICV etc.), are explained. Simple methods of search of indexed journals lists and abovementioned scientometric values are depicted. Up-to-date list of Ukrainian biological journals included in international citation indices, as well as their indexation and citation dynamics for the period 1996-2013, are represented. Modern problem of "predatory" journals and possible strategies for increase of Ukrainian journals representation in common informational space are discussed at the end of the paper.
22
Akoev, M. A., and O. V. Moskaleva. "FORECAST OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF RUSSIAN SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS: INDEXING IN INTERNATIONAL CITATION INDEXES (SCOPUS)." Scholarly Research and Information 3, no. 1 (January 1, 2020): 64–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.24108/2658-3143-2020-3-1-64-84.
Full textAbstract:
This article is the second in a series of articles representing the development forecast of Russian scientific journals. Based on the analysis of the dynamics of many bibliometric indicators of Russian journals presented in the Scopus citation index, a forecast is made for the development of journals by field of science using the OECD classifier. A forecast is made based on the data presented in the first article of this series, combined with the results of the analysis of Russian journals in the Scopus database, a list of journals that can soon replenish the collections of Russian journals in international citation indexes is presented.
23
Tsvetkova, Valentina, Galina Kalashnikova, and Yuliya Mokhnacheva. "Library and information scientific journals in the citation indices." Scientific and Technical Libraries, no. 5 (April 29, 2019): 37–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2019-5-37-48.
Full textAbstract:
The authors analyze the presence of the Russian journals in library and information sciences in the leading databases with the citation analysis function, i. e. Web of Science Core Collection (WoS CC), including Emerging Sources Citation Index, Scopus and Russian Index of Science Citation, as well as Russian Science Citation Index, EBSCO, LISA. About fifty Russian journals in these disciplines are revealed. The authors emphasize their insufficient coverage by the science citation databases. They suggest the following reasons for this situation: the limited number of journals in the library and information studies, non-compliance with formal requirements of citation databases, low quality of publications. The authors formulate the measures to improve the situation: to comply with international standards, to improve their quality so they could compete to foreign journals, as the international database generators and experts use international standards to select science journals for indexing.
24
Девисилов and Vladimir Devisilov. "Bases of Scientific Data, Citation Index, and How to Increase It." Safety in Technosphere 5, no. 6 (December 25, 2016): 3–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/24720.
Full textAbstract:
Scientometrical indicators for scientist activity, scientific magazines, citation indexes, methods of their definition and work with them have been considered. Main bases for scientific data – Scopus, Web of Science, Russian index of scientific citation (Russian science citation index) have been presented, rules of their use and work with them. Merits and demerits of the main scientometrical indicators are analyzed and recommendations for increase of scientist citation index are given. Scientific article’s structure, as well as requirements to its basic elements influencing a paper’s citation level, have been explained, recommendations for preparation of
such paper’s basic elements as its heading, abstract, keywords, citable sources’ bibliography have been given. The structure for the paper’s main text has been considered and recommendations on its writing have been given. A conclusion is drawn that one of the reasons related to low level citation of Russian scientists, and references to publications in Russian magazines is a lack of culture in writing of scientific papers and not observance of their preparation rules that complicates their annotation in bases of scientific data.
25
Meho, Lokman I., and Yvonne Rogers. "Citation counting, citation ranking, andh-index of human-computer interaction researchers: A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59, no. 11 (September 2008): 1711–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.20874.
Full text
26
Thomas, Jody R., and Alexander M. Clark. "Women with Heart Failure Are at High Psychosocial Risk: A Systematic Review of How Sex and Gender Influence Heart Failure Self-Care." Cardiology Research and Practice 2011 (2011): 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/918973.
Full textAbstract:
To improve patient support, it is important to understand how people view and experience Heart Failure (HF) self-care. This systematic review of qualitative studies included all published studies that examine the influence of sex and gender on HF self-care. A systematic search was done for papers (1995–2010) indexed in Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Medline, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid PsycINFO, CSA Sociological Abstracts, OVID AARP Ageline, EBSCO Academic Search Complete, EBSCO CINAHL, EBSCO SocINDEX, ISI Web of Science: Social Sciences Citation Index and Science Citation Index Expanded, and Scopus. After screening of 537 citations, six qualitative studies identified that differences existed in perceptions of symptoms with women having less family involvement and psychosocial support around self-care. Moreover, women had considerably more negative views of the future, themselves and their ability to fulfill social self-care roles. Women with HF represent a highly vulnerable population and need more support for psychosocial wellbeing and self-care.
27
Gupta, B. M., and SM Dhawan. "Electronic books A scientometric assessment of global literature during 1993 2018." DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology 39, no. 5 (September 12, 2019): 251–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.14429/djlit.39.5.14573.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose - This paper provides a quantitative and qualitative description of global research output in the “electronic books” published during 1993-18” based on select bibliometric indicators.
Design/Methodology/Approach - The study sourced sample data (2116 publications) from Scopus database covering period 1993-2018. The study analyzed data on a series of bibliometric measures (like average annual growth, citations per paper, international collaborative papers, relative citation index, activity index, top productive countries, organizations, authors, journals, and highly cited papers).
Findings - ‘E-books’ is fast emerging as a research topic in the domain of library and information science. Top 10 most productive countries in the subject account for 73.25% of global literature. The USA leads with 38.42% global publications share whereas other 9 of top 10 top productive countries are distant cousins contributing 1.61% to 8.74% share. United Kingdom registered the highest citation impact per paper and relative citation index (12.08 and 1.61). Bar-Ilan University, Israel was the most productive organization and H. Falk was the most productive author. Publishing Research Quarterly is the most popular journal in e-books.
Originality/value – This is the one of the comprehensive studies of its kind that provides a quantitative and qualitative description of research studies on the ‘e-books’.
28
Césars, Jasmine, Magline Alexis, and Evens Emmanuel. "Use Of Altmetric And Bibliometric Indicators To Measure Scientific Productivity In The Fields Of Life And Earth Sciences: Case Study From Haiti." European Scientific Journal, ESJ 17, no. 21 (June 30, 2021): 316. http://dx.doi.org/10.19044/esj.2021.v17n21p316.
Full textAbstract:
The objective of this study was to carry out, based on certain bibliometric and altimetric indicators, a summary assessment of the scientific productivity of Quisqueya University’s researchers in 3 specific fields: agronomy, the environment and health. An experimental framework was designed and implemented based on the quantitative information available on the academic social network ResearchGate, and on SCOPUS and Google scholar, out of a total of 12,731 citations enumerated for Quisqueya University as of December 31, 2020, 19% were for the environment, 19.3% were for health, 59.9% for agronomy and 1.8% for other sectors. All the sectors recorded a significant increase for the RG score altmetric indicator and for the two bibliometric indicators: number of citations and H-index. The data collected were analyzed using XLSTAT and R software. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test was applied for each of the indicators. Pearson's rank correlation was used to calculate the correlations between the altmetric indicator (RG-Score) from ResearchGate and the bibliometric indicators (citation and H-index) from Google Scholar and Scopus. A significant positive correlation of α = 0.918 was observed between the number of citations on ResearchGate and on Google Scholar. a result in the same direction (α = 0.991) is also observed between the number of citations on ResearchGate and on Scopus. These correlations allow us to conclude that the work of these researchers was cited in publications published in journals referenced in the Web of Science by a rate exceeding 90%.
29
Vílchez-Román, Carlos. "Bibliometric factors associated with h-index of Peruvian researchers with publications indexed on Web of Science and Scopus databases." Transinformação 26, no. 2 (August 2014): 143–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-37862014000200004.
Full textAbstract:
The objective of this article is: a) to identify Peruvian researchers with high, medium and low impact factor according to Web of Science and Scopus databases; b) to identify the bibliometric factor with the highest influence on h-index of Peruvian esearchers; c) to compare h-index between Web of Science and Scopus, at an individual and institutional level. Data were collected from Web of Science and Scopus (189 Peruvian researchers, 28 institutions on Web of Science and 33 on Scopus), between September 1823, 2013. Then, institutional registries were created and linear regression analysis with stepwise procedure was run to identify bibliometric factors with higher influence on the h-index of Peruvian researchers. Web of Science and Scopus showed interesting simmilarities in the h-index of Peruvian academic institutions. At individual level, documents indexed in citation database had the highest influence on the h-index. Regression model identified bibliometric factors with higher influence on the h-index of Peruvian researchers, however further large scale studies are needed to improve external validity.
30
Huh, Sun. "Citation Analysis of theKorean Journal of UrologyFrom Web of Science, Scopus, Korean Medical Citation Index, KoreaMed Synapse, and Google Scholar." Korean Journal of Urology 54, no. 4 (2013): 220. http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2013.54.4.220.
Full text
31
Allahabadi, Sachin, Ava Eftekhari, Sonali E. Feeley, Brian T. Feeley, and Drew A. Lansdown. "Influential and Highest Cited Shoulder Instability Articles: A Bibliometric Analysis." Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine 9, no. 3 (March 1, 2021): 232596712199257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121992577.
Full textAbstract:
Background: In orthopaedic surgery and other fields, the effect of influential journal articles has been evaluated by their citation counts and their correlation with methodological quality. Purpose: To identify and characterize the 50 most cited articles on shoulder instability, examine trends in publication characteristics, and evaluate the correlation of citations with quality of evidence. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: The Web of Science and Scopus online databases were searched to identify the top 50 most cited articles on shoulder instability, based on the average number of citations from each database. Article characteristics were recorded, and level of evidence and methodological quality were assessed using the modified Coleman Methodology Score (mCMS), Jadad scale, and Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). Spearman correlation was used to evaluate relationships between citations or citation density (citations/y) and level of evidence or methodological scoring. Top cited articles from recent years were also aggregated. Results: The top 50 most cited papers had a mean ± SD number of citations of 381.5 ± 166.7, with a mean of 15.0 ± 8.8 citations/y. Overall, 15 articles (30%) were biomechanical/cadaveric studies, and 15 (30%) were case series. Only 3 (6%) were considered to have level 1 evidence. The mean ± SD mCMS was 54.4 ± 12.7, mean ± SD Jadad score was 3.1 ± 1.4, and mean ± SD MINORS score was 10.5 ± 3.3. There were no significant correlations between citation rank or density and methodological assessments. There were weak correlations between citation rank and publication year ( rs = 0.32; P = .022) and between rank and level of evidence ( rs = –0.38; P = .047). The correlation between citation density and publication year was moderate ( rs = 0.70; P < .0001). There was no difference in citation density of the top 10 articles from 2010 to 2020 compared with the top 10 from the overall list (23.8 ± 5.3 vs 28.8 ± 9.5; P = .16). Conclusion: Influential articles in shoulder instability included a high proportion of biomechanical/cadaveric studies. The majority of top cited articles had lower evidence levels and poorer methodological quality without strong correlation with citations or citation density. There was a moderate correlation between citation density and year of publication.
32
Shved, Vadym V. "АНАЛІЗ ПРАКТИКИ ВИКОРИСТАННЯ НАУКОМЕТРИЧНИХ ПЛАТФОРМ В УКРАЇНІ." Information Technologies and Learning Tools 69, no. 1 (February 25, 2019): 235. http://dx.doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v69i1.2396.
Full textAbstract:
The article is devoted to the consideration of key scientometric platforms, which are widely used in Ukraine. The practice of application of such platforms as Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, Russian index of scientific citation, Index Copernicus, Journal's International Compliance Index, Ukrainian index of scientific citation, "Scientists of Ukraine" is analyzed. Key parametric tools that the above-mentioned platforms use to determine proposed scientometric indicators are identified and critically analyzed. In particular, attention is paid to the possibilities of evaluating the Hirsch-index for ranking scientific publications on the importance and value. The key shortcomings inherent in the Hirsch-index are revealed. Also, the practice of using the impact factor for assessing the quality of scientific publications is considered. Advantages and disadvantages of the practice of using these scientometric platforms for assessing the quality of the publication activity of institutions, publications and scientists are being studied. The key strengths and weaknesses of Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar have been identified. The possibility of using along with the above science-based platforms and such as: the Russian index of scientific citation and the Journal's International Compliance Index is being proved. The incorrectness of using the Index Copernicus platform for assessing the quality of scientific work and the inadequacy of the tools of the Ukrainian Index of Scientific Citation to the evaluation of the quality of scientific and publishing activity are justified. The inconsistency of using scientometric tools exclusively for assessing the quality of scientific work is being proved. The necessity of transforming the practice of assessing the quality of science through the prism of scientometric indicators, by changing the editorial policy (DORA) and the introduction of new parametric tools (R-factor) with another philosophy for the evaluation of scientific works is substantiated.
33
Galyani-Moghaddam, Golnessa, Hassan Jafari, and Asghar Sattarzadeh. "Publications by faculty members indexed in Science Citation Index and Scopus: an Iranian case study." Electronic Library 35, no. 6 (November 6, 2017): 1247–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/el-04-2016-0102.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose The paper aims to report an investigation that was conducted to identify the scholarly publications by faculty members of the Allameh Tabataba’i University that were indexed in two international databases, Science Citation Index (SCI) and Scopus, from the year the databases first included Iranian-authored papers (1987 and 1989, respectively) through the end of 2015. Design methodology/approach Scientometric methods and social network analysis techniques were used to conduct the study and to analyze the co-authorship network. Both quantitative and qualitative analyses were carried out on the data. Quantitative analysis was accomplished using Microsoft Excel, while the qualitative analysis was carried out using HistCite, VOSviewer and Pajek software. Findings Faculty members had the most international cooperation with colleagues from the USA and Switzerland, and they jointly authored papers with faculty and staff from other universities within Iran. The three institutions with the highest rate of co-authorship included the Islamic Azad University, Tehran University and Amir Kabir University of Technology. Practical implications The overall overlap among the two databases was about 21 per cent. The number of papers indexed by Scopus (583 records) was more than that by SCI (410 records). The total number of papers at an international level was much lower than that at the national level (6,426 records) in both the databases. Originality/value This paper provides insight into the scholarly works by the faculty of Allameh Tabataba’i University indexed in two international databases, SCI and Scopus. It also examines the co-authorship network structure.
34
Gupta, B. M., S. M. Dhawan, and Shankar Reddy Kolle. "Global Research Studies on Electronic Journals A Scientometric Study during 1990 2017." DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology 39, no. 3 (May 8, 2019): 116–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.14429/djlit.39.3.14016.
Full textAbstract:
This paper presents a quantitative and qualitative description of global research in the field “electronic journals”. The study is based on global publications data (1747 publications) on the subject sourced from SCOPUS database covering the period 1990-2017. The study analyzes the data on a series of measures, like average annual growth, citations per paper, international collaborative papers, relative citation index, and activity index. Global research in the subject registered 18.46% growth, research impact of 5.28 citations per paper, and contributed barely 26 highly cited papers within a long span of 28 years. The USA has emerged as the world leader in electronic journals research accounting for 45.28% global publications share, followed by U.K. (12.18%), India (5.49%), etc. Top 20 organizations and authors in the subject contributed 16.58% and 11.15% global publications share respectively and 37.72% and 43.92% global citations share respectively during the period.
35
Céspedes, Lucía. "LATIN AMERICAN JOURNALS AND HEGEMONIC LANGUAGES FOR ACADEMIC PUBLISHING IN SCOPUS AND WEB OF SCIENCE." Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada 60, no. 1 (April 2021): 141–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/010318138901311520201214.
Full textAbstract:
ABSTRACT This paper presents a descriptive analysis of SCOPUS’ and Web of Science’s journal lists, in order to illustrate and critically assess the current presence of Latin American journals included in these mainstream databases and their working languages for publication. The latest lists of journals released by both databases as of March 2020 were analyzed in terms of journal language and country of publication. Results show Brazil clearly emerges as the regional leader, especially in WoS’ Science Citation Index Expanded and Emerging Sources Citation Index. However, this predominance of Brazilian journals does not entail a corresponding relevance of the Portuguese language. Spanish is the predominant language in mainstream Latin American journals, especially in the Social Sciences and Humanities, while journals identified as multilingual tend to associate either Spanish or Portuguese with English. The combination of Spanish and Portuguese is significantly smaller. This calls for a critical revision of the state of the Latin American scientific-editorial field as a linguistic market, as well as for further questioning the role of English as the lingua franca of academia.
36
Bapte, Vishal Dattatray. "Information Literacy a Scientometric Assessment of Global Research Output." DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology 40, no. 01 (February 17, 2020): 374–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.14429/djlit.40.01.14686.
Full textAbstract:
The paper attempts to measure the global research output on information literacy (IL) on the basis of data retrieved from SCOPUS database during 1975 to 2019. The total output included 7070 record and 50584 citation. The average citation per paper was 7.15 per cent. Among the most significant sources titles used for the publication of IL research, Communication in Computer and Information Science was found to be leading journal with 380 papers. However, Journal of Academic Librarianship has been recorded for receiving highest citations (6.75 %) and highest (32) h-index. Pinto, M from Universidad de Granada has been observed as the most prolific author with 48 publication. Lloyed, A got maximum 1062 citation and the highest (17) h-index was calculated for him. Out of total output in the entire subject field, the subjects in the Social Sciences have been resulted for highest quantitative yield with h-index 170. With regard to the distribution by the types of documents, ‘Article’ seemed to be most preferred source over the rest. USA accounted for 46.94 per cent research output in total publications. Purdue University from United States and Queensland University of Technology ‘OUT’ from Australia have been most prominent institutions in terms of institutional output. 7070 documents produced 22353 keyword in which the phrase ‘information literacy’ dominated the remaining terms.
37
Wilkinson, Nicholas. "Editorial." Open House International 36, no. 4 (December 1, 2011): 4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ohi-04-2011-b0001.
Full textAbstract:
Three years ago Maarten Cleeren from Elsevier in the Netherlands wrote about Open House International as a fine journal stating that “ in recognition of the high quality and relevance to the scientific community of Open House International we are pleased to inform you that your publication has been selected for coverage in the Elsevier Bibliographic Database Scopus as of 2007”. This was therefore added to our two other database connections namely EBSCO PUBLISHING and Thomsons ISI database including all their products, The Social Science Citation Index, (SSCI,) the Arts & Humanities Citation Index, (A&HCI), Social Scisearch, Current Contents/Social & Behavioral Sciences,(CC/S&BS) and the Current Contents/Arts & Humanities, (CC/A&H) and Journal Citation Reports/Social Sciences Edition.
38
Zibareva, I. V., and N. S. Soloshenko. "Russian scientific publications 2005–2009 in the science citation index, scopus, and chemical abstracts databases." Scientific and Technical Information Processing 38, no. 3 (July 2011): 212–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.3103/s0147688211030178.
Full text
39
Jacsó, Péter. "The h‐index, h‐core citation rate and the bibliometric profile of the Scopus database." Online Information Review 35, no. 3 (June 21, 2011): 492–501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14684521111151487.
Full text
40
Sarasola Sánchez-Serrano, José Luis, Alicia Jaén-Martínez, Marta Montenegro-Rueda, and José Fernández-Cerero. "Impact of the Information and Communication Technologies on Students with Disabilities. A Systematic Review 2009–2019." Sustainability 12, no. 20 (October 17, 2020): 8603. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12208603.
Full textAbstract:
This article provides a bibliographic review of studies undertaken between 2009–2019 regarding the use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) to support the learning of students with disabilities, included in the following databases: Web of Science (WoS,) Scopus, ERIC, SciELO, and Google Scholar. Through a descriptive and quantitative methodology, and using bibliometric maps, the most significant data are presented according to their citation and repercussion index. The results show that ICTs are decisive for student with disabilities but there is evidence of a lack of training by teachers. In this regard, findings show that both the quantity of articles published in the different databases and the citations they receive have a medium-low impact index, as well as a low application of them.
41
KAMDEM, JEAN P., AMOS O. ABOLAJI, DANIEL H. ROOS, LUCIANA CALABRÓ, NILDA V. BARBOSA, DIOGO O. SOUZA, and JOÃO BATISTA T. ROCHA. "Scientific Performance of Brazilian Researchers in Pharmacology with grants from CNPq: A comparative study within the Brazilian categories." Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 88, no. 3 suppl (August 15, 2016): 1735–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201620150534.
Full textAbstract:
ABSTRACT In Brazil, scientific performance of researchers is one important criteria for decision-making in grant allocation. In this context, this study aimed to evaluate and compare the profile of 82 seniors' investigators (graded as level 1A-D) which were receiving CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development) productivity grant in Pharmacology, by analyzing the pattern of citation of their papers and h-index. Total documents, citations (with and without self-citations) and h-index (with and without self-citations) were retrieved from the Scopus database. The results indicated a clear difference among researchers from the higher categories (1A and 1B) in most of the parameters analyzed. However, no noticeable differentiation was found between researchers from grant category 1C and 1D. The results presented here may inform the scientific community and the grant agencies on the profile of PQ 1(A-D) fellows of Pharmacology, and may help to define new differences within CNPq grant categories, and consequently, a better allocation of grants.
42
Morokhovets, H., Yu Lysanets, L. Ostrovska, and T. Purdenko. "MASTERING THE TOOLS OF CITATION DATABASES IN HIGHER MEDICAL EDUCATION." Medical and Ecological Problems 23, no. 3-4 (June 19, 2019): 46–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.31718/mep.2019.23.3-4.11.
Full textAbstract:
In the contemporary academic setting, the quality of publications and the publication activity of a scientist, educational or research institution are evaluated using a set of scientific metric indicators. There are the following parameters: total citations, total number of links, the Hirsch index, impact factor, g-index, and-10 index. The aim of the paper is to cover the methods of working with the world scientific and metric databases of literature, as well as to explain the essence and algorithms for calculating the major scientific and metric indicators. We used the bibliosemantic research method in order to analyze the relevant scientific literature. The article describes the principles of mastering the tools of international databases Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Mendeley bibliographic manager, ORCID system. The paper focuses on the essence of scientific and metric indicators, calculated by these resources, as well as their scope and possibilities. The authors analyze the positive aspects of using the scientific metrics to determine the influence of a particular author or institution, as well as a number of subjective disadvantages of their widespread adoption in higher education. The modern tools for working with scientific information play a key role in the research activities of scientists, institutions of higher education, research institutions. The quality of publications is determined by a number of scientific metrics, calculated by authoritative scientific literature databases, such as Scopus and Web of Science. The h-indices are calculated in terms of publications in these bases, and serve as qualitative indicators for scientific activity evaluation. Scopus and Web of Science, in addition to their own built-in tools for searching, visualizing, analyzing and tracking data, integrated with the registers of scientists, bibliographic managers, plugins that allow to automate the processes of citation, lists of literature, preparation of publications according to the requirements of a specific edition, work with full-text versions of articles in different formats.
43
Семеріков, Сергій, Владислав Потоцький, Катерина Словак, Світлана Грищенко, and Арнольд Ків. "Automation of the Export Data from Open Journal Systems to the Russian Science Citation Index." Педагогіка вищої та середньої школи 51 (December 13, 2018): 276–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.31812/pedag.v51i0.3675.
Full textAbstract:
Semerikov S.O. Pototskyi V.S., Slovak K.I., Hryshchenko S.M. and Kiv A.E. Automation of the Export Data from Open Journal Systems to the Russian Science Citation Index.
It is shown that the calculation of scientometric indicators of the scientist and also the scientific journal continues to be an actual problem nowadays. It is revealed that the leading scientometric databases have the capabilities of automated metadata collection from the scientific journal website by the use of specialized electronic document management systems, in particular Open Journal Systems. It is established that Open Journal Systems successfully exports metadata about an article from scientific journals to scientometric databases Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar. However, there is no standard method of export from Open Journal Systems to such scientometric databases as the Russian Science Citation Index and Index Copernicus, which determined the need for research. The aim of the study is to develop the plug-in to the Open Journal Systems for the export of data from this system to scientometric database Russian Science Citation Index. As a result of the study, an infological model for exporting metadata from Open Journal Systems to the Russian Science Citation Index was proposed. The SirenExpo plug-in was developed to export data from Open Journal Systems to the Russian Science Citation Index by the use of the Articulusrelease preparation system.
44
Berhidi, Anna, Zsuzsa Margittai, and Lívia Vasas. "Looking back and moving forward: a bibliographic survey of the Hungarian-language Orvosi Hetilap." Orvosi Hetilap 153, no. 48 (December 2012): 1905–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/oh.2012.29499.
Full textAbstract:
Introduction: The first step in the process of acquisition of impact factor for a scientific journal is to get registered at Thomson Reuters Web of Science database. Aim: The aim of this article is to evaluate the content and structure of Orvosi Hetilap with regards to selection criteria of Thomson Reuters, in particular to objectives of citation analysis. Methods: Authors evaluated issues of Orvosi Hetilap published in 2011 and calculated the unofficial impact factor of the journal based on systematic search in various citation index databases. Number of citations, quality of citing journals and scientific output of the editorial board members were evaluated. Adherence to guidelines of international publishers was assessed, as well. Results: Unofficial impact factor of Orvosi Hetilap has been continuously rising every year in the past decade (except for 2004 and 2010). The articles of Orvosi Hetilap are widely cited by international authors and high impact factor journals, too. Further, more than half the articles cited are open access. The most frequently cited categories are original and review articles as well as clinical studies. Orvosi Hetilap is a weekly published journal, which is covered by many international databases such as PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Embase, and BIOSIS Previews. As regards to the scientific output of the editorial board members, the truncated mean of the number of their publications was 497, citations 2446, independent citations 2014 and h-index 21. Conclusions: While Orvosi Hetilap fulfils many criteria for getting covered by Thomson Reuters, it is worthwhile to implement a method of online citation system in order to increase the number of citations. In addition, scientific publications of all editorial board members should be made easily accessible. Finally, publications of comparative studies by multiple authors are encouraged as well as papers containing epidemiological data analyses. Orv. Hetil., 2012, 153, 1905–1917.
45
Allahabadi, Sachin, Sonali E. Feeley, Drew A. Lansdown, Nirav K. Pandya, and Brian T. Feeley. "Influential Articles on Pediatric and Adolescent Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: A Bibliometric Analysis." Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine 9, no. 6 (June 1, 2021): 232596712110107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671211010772.
Full textAbstract:
Background: The understanding of pediatric anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries and optimal treatment has evolved significantly. Influential articles have been previously evaluated using article citations to determine impact. Purpose: To identify and characterize the 50 most cited and recent influential articles relating to pediatric and adolescent ACL injuries, to examine trends in publication characteristics, and to evaluate correlations of study citations with quality of evidence. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: The top 50 most cited articles on pediatric and adolescent ACL injuries were gathered using the Web of Science and Scopus online databases by averaging the number of citations from each database. Articles from recent years were also aggregated and sorted by citation density (citations/year). Publication and study characteristics were recorded. Level of evidence and methodologic quality were assessed where applicable using the modified Coleman Methodology Score (mCMS), modified Jadad scale, and Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). Spearman correlation was used to evaluate the association between citation data and level of evidence or methodologic quality scorings. Results: The top 50 cited papers had a mean of 117.5 ± 58.8 citations (range, 58.5-288.5 citations), with a mean citation density of 9.4 ± 5.4 citations per year (range, 2.9-25.8 citations/year); 80% were published in 2000 or later, and 6% were considered basic science. Articles were mainly level 4 evidence (27/42; 64.3%), and none was level 1. There were moderate, significant associations between publication year and level of evidence ( r S = −0.45; P = .0030) and citation density and publication year ( r S = 0.59; P < .001). Mean methodologic quality scores were as follows: mCMS, 53 ± 7.2 (range, 39-68); modified Jadad scale, 3.2 ± 1.1 (range, 2-6); and MINORS, 11.2 ± 3.2 (range, 6-20). There was a significant, strong correlation between rank of mean citations and modified Jadad scale ( r S = 0.76; P < .0001), suggesting poorer score associated with more mean citations. Conclusion: Influential articles on pediatric and adolescent ACL injuries were relatively recent, with a low proportion of basic science–type articles. Most of the studies had a lower evidence level and poor methodologic quality scores. Higher methodologic quality did not correlate positively with citation data.
46
Babanov, S. A., and A. G. Baykova. "Analysis of publications on occupational bronchial asthma in the Scopus system and other citation databases." Okhrana truda i tekhnika bezopasnosti na promyshlennykh predpriyatiyakh (Labor protection and safety procedure at the industrial enterprises), no. 1 (December 20, 2020): 40–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.33920/pro-4-2101-05.
Full textAbstract:
The authors analyzed and determined the scientometric indicators of the institutions, journals and authors who have published the largest number of scientific articles on such a disease as occupational bronchial asthma. On average, the authors produced 58 articles per year and had a high H-index. Their knowledge will allow interested users to conduct a more targeted information search for publications.
47
Liu, Zao. "Bibliometric Study of Family Studies Journals Using Journal Impact Factors, CiteScore and H-index." International Journal of Librarianship 6, no. 1 (July 10, 2021): 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.23974/ijol.2021.vol6.1.174.
Full textAbstract:
Although there are bibliometric studies of journals in various fields, the field of family studies remains unexplored. Using the bibliometric metrics of the two-year and five-year Journal Impact Factors, the H-index, and the newly revised CiteScore, this paper examines the relationships among these metrics in a bibliometric study of forty-four representative family studies journals. The citation data were drawn from Journal Citation Reports, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The correlation analysis found strong positive relationships on the metrics. Despite the strong correlations, discrepancies in rank orders of the journals were found. A possible explanation of noticeable discrepancy in rankings was provided, and the implications of the study for stakeholders were discussed.
48
Rios-González, Carlos Miguel, Ginno Alessandro De Benedictis-Serrano, Laura Valentina Contreras Lugo, Génesys José Córdova-Rivas, and María Lucía Contreras Romero. "Análisis bibliométrico sobre las publicaciones de eutanasia en SCOPUS, MEDLINE/Pubmed, Science Citation Index y SciELO." Revista Medica Herediana 29, no. 2 (July 12, 2018): 125. http://dx.doi.org/10.20453/rmh.v29i2.3355.
Full text
49
Lepard, Jacob R., and Beverly C. Walters. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Neurosurgical Practice Guidelines." Neurosurgery 86, no. 5 (July 2, 2019): 605–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyz240.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract BACKGROUND In the last 20 yr, the rate of neurosurgical guideline publication has increased. However, despite the higher volume and increasing emphasis on quality there remains no reliable means of measuring the overall impact of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). OBJECTIVE To utilize citation analysis to evaluate the dispersion of neurosurgical CPGs. METHODS A list of neurosurgical guidelines was compiled by performing electronic searches using the Scopus (Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands) and National Guideline Clearinghouse databases. The Scopus database was queried to obtain current publication and citation data for all included documents and categorized based upon recognized neurosurgical specialties. The h-index, R-index, h2-index, i10-index, and dissemination index (D-Index) were manually calculated for each subspecialty. RESULTS After applying screening criteria the search yielded 372 neurosurgical CPGs, which were included for bibliometric analysis. The overall calculated h-index for neurosurgery was 56. When broken down by subspecialty trauma/critical care had the highest value at 35, followed by spine and peripheral nerve at 30, cerebrovascular at 28, tumor at 16, pediatrics at 14, miscellaneous at 11, and functional/stereotactic/pain at 6. Cerebrovascular neurosurgery was noted to have the highest D-Index at 3.4. CONCLUSION A comprehensive framework is useful for guideline impact analysis. Bibliometric data provides a novel and adequate means of evaluating the successful dissemination of neurosurgical guidelines. There remains a paucity of data regarding implementation and clinical outcomes of individual guidelines.
50
Altun, Gürcan, and Yasemin Balcı. "2000-2004 Yılları Arasında Science Citation Index’de Taranan Türkiye Kaynaklı Adli Tıp Yayınlarına Yapılan Atıflar." Bulletin of Legal Medicine 15, no. 2 (August 1, 2010): 48–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.17986/blm.2010152706.
Full textAbstract:
Bir makalenin çok sayıda atıf alması ilgili olduğu bilim alanına katkısını gösterir. Bu amaçla, 2000-2004 yılları arasında adli tıp uzman ve asistanlarının katkısı ile Science Citation Index/Expanded kapsamındaki dergilerde yayınlanmış olan 86 yayının, Scopus ve Web of Science (WoS) veri tabanlarındaki atıf sayıları ve yayınlandıkları dergilerin etki değerleri araştırıldı. Her iki veri tabanındaki atıf sayılarına göre yayın etki değeri hesaplandı. Çalışma grubunu oluşturan yayınların etki değerinin 1.48 olduğu (WoS için) ve ülke ortalamasının altında kaldığı saptandı. Bu durum yayınların yarısının yayınlanmış olduğu dergilerin etki değerinin görece düşük olması ile açıklanabilir. Yayınların etki değeri, 2001 yılında en yüksek (Scopus: 3.18, WoS: 2.64), 2004 yılında en düşük (Scopus: 1, WoS: 0.78) idi. 2004 yılındaki yayın etki değerinin düşük olması, taramanın yapıldığı zamana kadar geçen sürenin kısa oluşu ve bu süreçte yayınların yaklaşık yarısının hiç atıf almamış olmasından kaynaklanmaktadır.Anahtar kelimeler: Adli tıp, Türkiye’nin adli tıp yayınları, atıf, etki değeri