Academic literature on the topic 'Scriptural Reasoning'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Scriptural Reasoning.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Scriptural Reasoning"

1

Higton, Mike. "Scriptural Reasoning." Conversations in Religion & Theology 7, no. 2 (November 2009): 129–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-2214.2009.00163.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

McGowan, Andrew. "Scripture, Conversation and Anglican Identity." Journal of Anglican Studies 11, no. 2 (September 27, 2013): 139–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1740355313000314.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThis editorial piece considers the implications of Scriptural Reasoning, a method of inter-religious exchange that is the subject of the present number of the journal, for contemporary Anglicanism. It suggests that the character of Scriptural Reasoning as a conversation held across and despite religious difference offers a challenge to contemporary Anglicans to maintain their own conversation about Scripture.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

KEPNES, STEVEN. "A HANDBOOK FOR SCRIPTURAL REASONING." Modern Theology 22, no. 3 (July 2006): 367–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0025.2006.00323.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

OCHS, PETER. "PHILOSOPHIC WARRANTS FOR SCRIPTURAL REASONING." Modern Theology 22, no. 3 (July 2006): 465–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0025.2006.00328.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

HARDY, DANIEL W. "THE PROMISE OF SCRIPTURAL REASONING." Modern Theology 22, no. 3 (July 2006): 529–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0025.2006.00333.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Ochs, Peter. "The Hearths of Scriptural Reasoning." Modern Theology 37, no. 3 (June 20, 2021): 769–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/moth.12717.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Ochs, Peter. "Hospitality and the Power of Divine Attraction: A Jewish Commentary on the Anglican Setting of Scriptural Reasoning." Journal of Anglican Studies 11, no. 2 (September 27, 2013): 179–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s174035531300017x.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThe emergence of Scriptural Reasoning (SR) as a movement and a society of scholars was made possible by the hospitality, influence and cohort of two Anglican theologians, the late Revd Daniel Hardy and Professor David Ford. In this essay, I offer a Jewish commentary on several Anglican theological dispositions that might contribute to this hospitality: among them are ‘found theology’ (as I label it), responsiveness to the powers of divine attraction, concern to repair obstructions to the healing work of the Spirit, and attentiveness to Scripture as host and source of reparative reasoning. While the primary subject of the essay is a species of Christian theology, the method of the essay emerges from a recent approach to Jewish philosophy we call ‘textual reasoning’ (TR), one of the antecedents of SR. In the style of TR, I encounter theology as a ‘disposition’, or mode of practice, displayed in particular in practices of reading and interpreting Scripture and of responding to the call of Scripture in societal action. The essay is structured as a series of brief accounts of Anglican theological dispositions, each one followed by a Jewish ‘commentary’, culminating in a sample of Anglican-Jewish dialogue as it might be overheard within a session of scriptural reasoning.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Huilin, Y. "'Scriptural Reasoning' and the 'Hermeneutical Circle'." Literature and Theology 28, no. 2 (May 27, 2014): 151–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/litthe/fru027.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Cheetham, David. "Scriptural reasoning: texts or/and tents?" Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations 21, no. 4 (October 2010): 343–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2010.527102.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Ahmed, Rumee. "Scriptural Reasoning and the Anglican–Muslim Encounter." Journal of Anglican Studies 11, no. 2 (September 27, 2013): 166–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1740355313000053.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThe process of scriptural reasoning promises to facilitate dialogue and understanding across religious divides. In this paper, the author reflects on the experience of scriptural reasoning with Anglicans and Muslims; describing the phenomenon of ‘fellowship, not consensus’ with reference to key points of doctrinal difference between the two religious traditions.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Scriptural Reasoning"

1

Slater, Gary. "Trajectories of Peircean philosophical theology : scriptural reasoning, axiology of thinking, and nested continua." Thesis, University of Oxford, 2015. http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:7d901745-ca3e-47d1-8143-c4b70a127c31.

Full text
Abstract:
The writings of the American pragmatist thinker Charles S. Peirce (1839-1914) provide resources for what this thesis calls the “nested continua model” of theological interpretation. A diagrammatic demonstration of iconic relational logic akin to Peirce’s Existential Graphs, the nested continua model is imagined as a series of concentric circles graphed upon a two-dimensional plane. When faced with some problem of interpretation, one may draw discrete markings that signify that problem’s logical distinctions, then represent in the form of circles successive contexts by which these distinctions may be examined in relation to one another, arranged ordinally at relative degrees of specificity and vagueness, aesthetic intensity and concrete reasonableness. Drawing from Peter Ochs’s Scriptural Reasoning model of interfaith dialogue and Robert C. Neville’s axiology of thinking—each of which makes creative use of Peirce’s logic—this project aims to achieve an analytical unity between these two thinkers’ projects, which can then be addressed to further theological ends. The model hinges between diagrammatic and ameliorative functions, honing its logic to disclose contexts in which its theological or metaphysical claims might, if needed, be revised. Such metaphysical claims include love as that which unites feeling with intelligibility, hell as imprisonment within an opaque circle of interpretation whose distorted reflections render violence upon oneself and others, and the divine as both the center of aesthetic creativity and outermost horizon from which our many layers of interpretive criteria emerge. These are claims made from a particular identity in a particular cultural context, but the logical rules upon which they are based are accessible to all, and the hope of the model is to help people overcome problems of interpretation and orient themselves toward eternity without ignoring the world around them.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Moseley, Anne. "An inquiry into the development of intercultural learning in primary schools using applied scriptural reasoning principles." Thesis, University of Warwick, 2018. http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/112822/.

Full text
Abstract:
This thesis explores the possibility of applying Scriptural Reasoning (SR) principles for promoting Intercultural Communicative Competence (ICC) in primary schools. It used storytelling and interfaith dialogue to encourage pupils to exercise these competences in classroom settings. It takes its philosophical position from the work of Ricoeur and combines a phenomenological and interpretive approach to Religious Education (RE) to develop pupils' understanding of both the "other" and the "self." From this theoretical position, an age-appropriate intervention was developed based on the principles of Scriptural Reasoning in collaboration with the Cambridge Interfaith Program (CIP). The resulting "Story Tent" themed day built on the established work of Julia Ipgrave's dialogic and Esther Reed's narrative approach to religious education. The underpinning work utilised Action Research (AR) methodology through a cyclical approach which took place over two iterative cycles in three different schools, each with its own distinctively-different religious ethos and demographic make-up. It was unusual in combining the contributions not only of teachers and researcher but also faith representatives from local communities. Data was collected through pupil self-assessments, group work, and research team interviews during the Story Tent Intervention day. Follow-up interviews were completed with a selection of pupils using a semi-structured interview - The Autobiography of Intercultural Encounter (AIE). The data was combined to produce pupil case study portfolios. ATLAS.ti was used to support the coding process and analysis of the data. The initial primary findings suggest that the genre of story; the pedagogic style of drama; and the process of interreligious dialogue were particularly effective approaches which provided an environment where pupils and adults could explore and exercise intercultural communication. The secondary findings indicate that the skills and attitudinal competences outlined by Michael Byram seemed to lie within a hierarchy, both cognitively and interactionally. There was evidence which suggested that pupils with a strong sense of identity and were also able to tolerate ambiguity demonstrated a range of intercultural competences including critical cultural awareness. Finally, the personal religious identity of the pupils also had an impact on the pupils' responses to the encounters, which (in combination with other factors) could be associated with particularly positive or negative outcomes.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Scriptural Reasoning"

1

Milton's scriptural reasoning: Narrative and protestant toleration. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Reasoning from the Scriptures with Catholics. Eugene, Or: Harvest House Publishers, 2000.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

1930-, Bodine Marian, ed. Reasoning from the Scriptures with the Mormons. Eugene, Or: Harvest House Publishers, 1995.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Rhodes, Ron. Reasoning from the Scriptures with the Jehovah's Witnesses. Eugene, Or: Harvest House, 1993.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Reasoning from the Scriptures with the Jehovah's Witnesses. Eugene, Or: Harvest House Publishers, 2009.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Magnani, Duane. Point/counterpoint: A refutation of the Jehovah's Witness book, Reasoning from the Scriptures. Clayton, CA: Witness Inc., 1986.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Yurtsever, Savasan. Scriptural Unity: An interfaith dialogue through Scriptural Reasoning. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2012.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

1948-, Ford David, and Pecknold C. C, eds. The promise of scriptural reasoning. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2006.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Moyaert, Marianne. Interreligious Literacy and Scriptural Reasoning. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190677565.003.0007.

Full text
Abstract:
In this chapter, I first lay out the most important hermeneutical and anthropological principles that undergird my understanding of interreligious learning. As will become clear, I take my inspiration to a large extent from the French philosopher Paul Ricoeur, who has been called “the philosopher of all dialogues.” Then I will make these theoretical considerations more concrete by elaborating on an interreligious dialogical approach that to my mind works transformatively: scriptural reasoning. I will explain what this practice is all about and how I try to guide my students throughout this learning process. As an introduction, I briefly dwell upon the particular context in which I work and from which I speak.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Donnelly, Phillip J. Milton's Scriptural Reasoning: Narrative and Protestant Toleration. University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations, 2012.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Scriptural Reasoning"

1

Ford, David F. "Developing Scriptural Reasoning Further." In Scripture, Reason, and the Contemporary Islam-West Encounter, 201–19. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230605626_10.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Kavka, Martin. "Is Scriptural Reasoning Senseless?" In Scripture, Reason, and the Contemporary Islam-West Encounter, 133–46. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230605626_7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Moyaert, Marianne. "Scriptural Reasoning as a Ritualized Practice." In Interreligious Relations and the Negotiation of Ritual Boundaries, 87–106. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05701-5_6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Slater, Gary. "Between Comparison and Normativity: Scriptural Reasoning and Religious Ethics." In Scripture, Tradition, and Reason in Christian Ethics, 45–66. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25193-2_3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Adams, Nicholas. "Beyond Logics of Preservation and Burial: The Display of Distance and Proximity of Traditions in Scriptural Reasoning." In Scripture, Reason, and the Contemporary Islam-West Encounter, 123–32. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230605626_6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

"Scriptural Reasoning: A Feminist Response." In Interreligious Hermeneutics in Pluralistic Europe, 79–82. Brill | Rodopi, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789401200370_006.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

"Scriptural Reasoning and Interfaith Hermeneutics." In Interreligious Hermeneutics in Pluralistic Europe, 57–78. Brill | Rodopi, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789401200370_005.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Ford, David F. "The Theological and Educational Promise of Scriptural Reasoning." In Schools of Faith. T&T Clark, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9780567667960.ch-022.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Moriarty, Michael. "The Wager." In Pascal: Reasoning and Belief, 358–88. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198849117.003.0020.

Full text
Abstract:
Pascal argues, on the basis of the logic of probability, that it is more advantageous to believe in God than not, since the gains of belief, if he exists, are far greater than any loss we would incur by believing if he does not exist. In the light of this, he argues that anyone who cannot believe should condition himself or herself to do so by the bodily discipline of practising Christian rituals. These arguments are clarified in detail, and the objections addressed to both are evaluated, especially the argument that the Wager would validate belief in any God. The conclusion is that our assessment of the Wager’s efficacy must depend on our views as to its relation to the anthropological, scriptural, and historical arguments discussed in earlier chapters.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Slater, Gary. "The Status of History in Peter Ochs’s Scriptural Reasoning." In C. S. Peirce and the Nested Continua Model of Religious Interpretation, 112–39. Oxford University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198753230.003.0005.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography