Academic literature on the topic 'Search tools'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Search tools.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Search tools"
Boss, Stephen C., and Michael L. Nelson. "Federated Search Tools." Reference Librarian 44, no. 91-92 (October 26, 2005): 139–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/j120v44n91_10.
Full textGlusker, Ann. "PubMed’s Native Interface Remains the Best Tool for Systematic Searching of its Biomedical Citations." Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 12, no. 2 (June 29, 2017): 166. http://dx.doi.org/10.18438/b88s9k.
Full textGoodsett, Mandi. "Discovery search tools: a comparative study." Reference Reviews 28, no. 6 (August 12, 2014): 2–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/rr-12-2013-0312.
Full textMUMINOV, BAHODIR, and Ulugbek Bekmurodov. "FVS-TECHNOLOGY: INTELLECTUAL SEARCH TOOLS." IIUM Engineering Journal 22, no. 1 (January 4, 2021): 118–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.31436/iiumej.v22i1.1389.
Full textSparks, Susan. "Connecting to Internet -Search Tools." International Nursing Review 45, no. 6 (November 1998): 192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-7657.45.no.6issue342.9.x.
Full textSparks, Susan. "Connecting to Internet-Search Tools." International Nursing Review 46, no. 2 (March 1999): 64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-7657.45.no.6issue342.9.x-i2.
Full textSparks, Susan. "Connecting to Internet-Search Tools." International Nursing Review 46, no. 5 (January 31, 2003): 160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.1996.00012.x-i1.
Full textKimmel, Stacey. "WWW Search Tools in Reference Services." Reference Librarian 27, no. 57 (September 29, 1997): 5–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/j120v27n57_02.
Full textBoykin, Priscilla. "Excellent Article on Web Search Tools." Image: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship 31, no. 1 (March 1999): 10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1999.tb00409.x.
Full textLeBeau, Brandon. "pdfsearch: Search Tools for PDF Files." Journal of Open Source Software 3, no. 27 (July 8, 2018): 668. http://dx.doi.org/10.21105/joss.00668.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Search tools"
Saunders, Tana. "Evaluation of Internet search tools instrument design." Thesis, Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2004. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/49957.
Full textENGLISH ABSTRACT: This study investigated Internet search tools / engines to identify desirable features that can be used as a benchmark or standard to evaluate web search engines. In the past, the Internet was thought of as a big spider's web, ultimately connecting all the bits of information. It has now become clear that this is not the case, and that the bow tie analogy is more accurate. This analogy suggests that there is a central core of well-connected pages, with links IN and OUT to other pages, tendrils and orphan pages. This emphasizes the importance of selecting a search tool that is well connected and linked to the central core. Searchers must take into account that not all search tools search the Invisible Web and this will reflect on the search tool selected. Not all information found on the Web and Internet is reliable, current and accurate, and Web information must be evaluated in terms of authority, currency, bias, purpose of the Web site, etc. Different kinds of search tools are available on the Internet, such as search engines, directories, library gateways, portals, intelligent agents, etc. These search tools were studied and explored. A new categorization for online search tools consisting of Intelligent Agents, Search Engines, Directories and Portals / Hubs is suggested. This categorization distinguishes the major differences between the 21 kinds of search tools studied. Search tools / engines consist of spiders, crawlers, robots, indexes and search tool software. These search tools can be further distinguished by their scope, internal or external searches and whether they search Web pages or Web sites. Most search tools operate within a relationship with other search tools, and they often share results, spiders and databases. This relationship is very dynamic. The major international search engines have identifiable search features. The features of Google, Yahoo, Lycos and Excite were studied in detail. Search engines search for information in different ways, and present their results differently. These characteristics are critical to the Recall/Precision ratio. A well-planned search strategy will improve the Precision/Recall ratio and consider the web-user capabilities and needs. Internet search tools/engines is not a panacea for all information needs, and have pros and cons. The Internet search tool evaluation instrument was developed based on desirable features of the major search tools, and is considered a benchmark or standard for Internet search tools. This instrument, applied to three South African search tools, provided insight into the capabilities of the local search tools compared to the benchmark suggested in this study. The study concludes that the local search engines compare favorably with the major ones, but not enough so to use them exclusively. Further research into this aspect is needed. Intelligent agents are likely to become more popular, but the only certainty in the future of Internet search tools is change, change, and change.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Hierdie studie het Internetsoekinstrumente/-enjins ondersoek met die doel om gewenste eienskappe te identifiseer wat as 'n standaard kan dien om soekenjins te evalueer. In die verlede is die Internet gesien as 'n groot spinnerak, wat uiteindelik al die inligtingsdeeltjies verbind. Dit het egter nou duidelik geword dat dit glad nie die geval is nie, en dat die strikdas analogie meer akkuraat is. Hierdie analogie stel voor dat daar 'n sentrale kern van goed gekonnekteerde bladsye is, met skakels IN en UIT na ander bladsye, tentakels en weesbladsye. Dit beklemtoon die belangrikheid om die regte soekinstrument te kies, naamlik een wat goed gekonnekteer is, en geskakel is met die sentrale kern van dokumente. Soekers moet in gedagte hou dat nie alle soekenjins in die Onsigbare Web soek nie, en dit behoort weerspieël te word in die keuse van die soekinstrument. Nie alle inligting wat op die Web en Internet gevind word is betroubaar, op datum en akkuraat nie, en Web-inligting moet geëvalueer word in terme van outoriteit, tydigheid, vooroordeel, doel van die Webruimte, ens. Verskillende soorte soekinstrumente is op die Internet beskikbaar, soos soekenjins, gidse, biblioteekpoorte, portale, intelligente agente, ens. Hierdie soekinstrumente is bestudeer en verken. 'n Nuwe kategorisering vir aanlyn soekinstrumente bestaande uit Intelligente Agente, Soekinstrumente, Gidse en Portale/Middelpunte word voorgestel. Hierdie kategorisering onderskei die hoofverskille tussen die 21 soorte soekinstrumente wat bestudeer is. Soekinstrumente/-enjins bestaan uit spinnekoppe, kruipers, robotte, indekse en soekinstrument sagteware. Hierdie soekinstrumente kan verder onderskei word deur hulle omvang, interne of eksterne soektogte en of hulle op Webbladsye of Webruimtes soek. Die meeste soekinstrumente werk in verhouding met ander soekinstrumente, en hulle deel dikwels resultate, spinnekoppe en databasisse. Hierdie verhouding is baie dinamies. Die hoof internasionale soekenjins het soekeienskappe wat identifiseerbaar is. Die eienskappe van Google, Yahoo en Excite is in besonderhede bestudeer. Soekenjins soek op verskillende maniere na inligting, en lê hulle resultate verskillend voor. Hierdie karaktereienskappe is krities vir die Herwinning/Presisie verhouding. 'n Goedbeplande soekstrategie sal die Herwinning/Presisie verhouding verbeter. Internet soekinstrumente/-enjins is nie die wondermiddel vir alle inligtingsbehoeftes nie, en het voor- en nadele. Die Internet soekinstrument evalueringsmeganisme se ontwikkeling is gebaseer op gewenste eienskappe van die hoof soekinstrumente, en word beskou as 'n standaard vir Internet soekinstrumente. Hierdie instrument, toegepas op drie Suid-Afrikaanse soekenjins, het insae verskaf in die doeltreffendheid van die plaaslike soekinstrumente soos vergelyk met die standaard wat in hierdie studie voorgestel word. In die studie word tot die slotsom gekom dat die plaaslike soekenjins gunstig vergelyk met die hoof soekenjins, maar nie genoegsaam sodat hulle eksklusief gebruik kan word nie. Verdere navorsing oor hierdie aspek is nodig. Intelligente Agente sal waarskynlik meer gewild word, maar die enigste sekerheid vir die toekoms van Internet soekinstrumente is verandering, verandering en nogmaals verandering.
Moghaddam, Mehdi Minachi. "Internet search techniques : using word count, links and directory structure as Internet search tools." Thesis, University of Bedfordshire, 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/10547/314080.
Full textManicassamy, Jayanthi, and P. Dhavachelvan. "VirusPKT: A Search Tool For Assimilating Assorted Acquaintance For Viruses." Engg Journals Publications, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/212814.
Full textBani-Ahmad, Sulieman Ahmad. "RESEARCH-PYRAMID BASED SEARCH TOOLS FOR ONLINE DIGITAL LIBRARIES." Case Western Reserve University School of Graduate Studies / OhioLINK, 2008. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=case1207228115.
Full textKlein, Abigail (Abigail B. ). "Search tools for scaling expert code review to the global classroom." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/105991.
Full textThis electronic version was submitted by the student author. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections.
Cataloged from student-submitted PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (pages 57-58).
This thesis aims to answer the question "How can teachers of online classrooms give more qualitative feedback to students?" We narrow the scope of this question to an online software engineering class in which a major component is code review. We built two search tools that give teachers better coverage of student code. The first tool, Comment Search, allows students and staff to reuse any comment they previously wrote when reviewing another student's code. Staff can reuse any comment written by any staff member as well. After deploying Comment Search in a classroom for a full semester, we found that students and staff used this tool to write higher quality comments. We also found that many reused comments were about similar patterns in code. This inspired the second tool, Code Search, which allows teachers to search for sections of student code that contain a desired pattern. Preliminary results of Code Search are promising: for the queries that Code Search is built for, Code Search returns nearly all relevant results. Together, Comment Search and Code Search offer teachers the ability to give meaningful comments to many more students than otherwise possible.
by Abigail Klein.
M. Eng.
O'loughlin, Benjamin. "Evaluation of Search and Rescue Planning Tools on the West Florida Shelf." Scholar Commons, 2016. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/6557.
Full textHarris, Martyn. "The anatomy of a search and mining system for digital humanities : Search And Mining Tools for Language Archives (SAMTLA)." Thesis, Birkbeck (University of London), 2017. http://bbktheses.da.ulcc.ac.uk/236/.
Full textRAYAPROLU, SRINIVAS. "USING COM OBJECTS PROGRAMMING FOR ENHANCED LIBRARY SEARCH APPLICATIONS." University of Cincinnati / OhioLINK, 2002. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1029441248.
Full textDubey, Anshul. "Search and Analysis of the Sequence Space of a Protein Using Computational Tools." Diss., Georgia Institute of Technology, 2006. http://hdl.handle.net/1853/14115.
Full textWormet, Jody R. "Federated Search Tools in Fusion Centers : Bridging Databases in the Information Sharing Environment." Thesis, Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10945/17480.
Full textThis research utilized a semi-structured survey instrument delivered to subject matter experts within the national network of fusion centers and employed a constant comparison method to analyze the survey results. This smart practice exploration informed through an appreciative inquiry lens found considerable variation in how fusion centers plan for, gather requirements, select and acquire federated search tools to bridge disparate databases. These findings confirmed the initial hypothesis that fusion centers have received very little guidance on how to bridge disconnected databases to enhance the analytical process. This research should contribute to the literature by offering a greater understanding of the challenges faced by fusion centers, when considering integrating federated search tools; by evaluating the importance of the planning, requirements gathering, selection and acquisition processes for integrating federated search tools; by acknowledging the challenges faced by some fusion centers during these integration processes; and identifying possible solutions to mitigate those challenges. As a result, the research will be useful to individual fusion centers and more broadly, the National Fusion Center Association, which provides leadership to the national network of fusion centers by sharing lessons learned, smart practices, and other policy guidance.
Books on the topic "Search tools"
Ercegovac, Zorana. Information literacy: Search strategies, tools & resources. Los Angeles, Calif: InfoEN Associates, 1998.
Find full textFarnham, Alexander. Search for early New Jersey toolmakers. Stockton, N.J: Kingwood Studio Publications, 1992.
Find full textE, Rosch Mark, ed. Google for lawyers: Essential search tips and productivity tools. Chicago, Ill: Law Practice Management Section, American Bar Association, 2010.
Find full textInformation literacy: Search strategies, tools & resources for high school students. Worthington, Ohio: Linworth Pub., 2001.
Find full textRandolph, Ryan P. New research techniques: Getting the most out of search engine tools. New York: Rosen Central, 2011.
Find full textDavis, Harold. Building Research Tools with Google For Dummies. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2005.
Find full textDavis, Harold. Building research tools with Google for dummies. Indianapolis, Ind: Wiley, 2005.
Find full textMcFarlane, Nigel. Firefox Hacks: Tips & Tools for Next-Generation Web Browsing. Beijing: O'Reilly Media, 2005.
Find full textFirefox hacks: Tips & tools for next-generation web browsing. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media, 2005.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Search tools"
Umemoto, Kazutoshi, Takehiro Yamamoto, and Katsumi Tanaka. "Search Support Tools." In Human–Computer Interaction Series, 139–60. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38825-6_8.
Full textBrambilla, Marco, and Luca Tettamanti. "Tools Supporting Search Computing Application Development." In Search Computing, 169–81. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19668-3_16.
Full textZoroa, Noemí, María-José Fernández-Sáez, and Procopio Zoroa. "Tools to Manage Search Games on Lattices." In Search Theory, 29–58. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6825-7_3.
Full textHassan, Nihad A., and Rami Hijazi. "Search Engine Techniques." In Open Source Intelligence Methods and Tools, 127–201. Berkeley, CA: Apress, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-3213-2_4.
Full textSimonis, Helmut, and Abder Aggoun. "Search-Tree Visualisation." In Analysis and Visualization Tools for Constraint Programming, 191–208. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/10722311_8.
Full textCarro, Manuel, and Manuel Hermenegildo. "Tools for Search-Tree Visualisation: The APT Tool." In Analysis and Visualization Tools for Constraint Programming, 237–52. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/10722311_10.
Full textWang, Xinyuan, Fanhao Zhang, Zhuoran Liu, Changsheng Zhang, Qidong Zhao, and Bin Zhang. "A Novel Multi-objective Squirrel Search Algorithm: MOSSA." In Simulation Tools and Techniques, 180–95. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72795-6_15.
Full textKelsey, Todd. "Explore Indexing and Webmaster Tools/Search Console." In Introduction to Search Engine Optimization, 97–109. Berkeley, CA: Apress, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-2851-7_7.
Full textHuang, Pengyu, Fuping Wu, Wei Wang, Haiyan Liu, and Qin Liu. "Finding Good Mobile Sink Information Collection Paths with Quicker Search Time: A Single-Particle Multi-dimensional Search Algorithm-Based Approach." In Simulation Tools and Techniques, 385–98. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72795-6_32.
Full textHassan, Nihad A., and Rami Hijazi. "People Search Engines and Public Records." In Open Source Intelligence Methods and Tools, 261–84. Berkeley, CA: Apress, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-3213-2_6.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Search tools"
Pu, Pearl Huan Z., and Pratyush Kumar. "Evaluating example-based search tools." In the 5th ACM conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/988772.988804.
Full textJones, Rosie, and Ted Drake. "Applications of open search tools." In the 19th international conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1772690.1772926.
Full textGoutam, Rajesh Kumar. "Correlation Based Evaluation for Search Tools." In 2018 5th International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN). IEEE, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/spin.2018.8474041.
Full textYahya, Adnan H., and Ali Y. Salhi. "Enhancement tools for Arabic web search." In 2011 International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology (IIT). IEEE, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/innovations.2011.5893871.
Full textWrigley, Stuart N., Dorothee Reinhard, Khadija Elbedweihy, Abraham Bernstein, and Fabio Ciravegna. "Methodology and campaign design for the evaluation of semantic search tools." In the 3rd International Semantic Search Workshop. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1863879.1863889.
Full textGage, Douglas W. "Randomized search strategies with imperfect sensors." In Optical Tools for Manufacturing and Advanced Automation, edited by William J. Wolfe and Wendell H. Chun. SPIE, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.167503.
Full textKniazev, Alexei Y. "A Search for PNe in Nearby Galaxies with SDSS Imaging Data." In PLANETARY NEBULAE AS ASTRONOMICAL TOOLS: International Conference on Planetary Nebulae as Astronomical Tools. AIP, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2146218.
Full textAlshuwaier, Faisal A., Waleed A. Almutairi, and Ali M. Areshey. "Smart Search Tools Using Named Entity Recognition." In 2013 International Conference on Information Technology and Applications (ITA). IEEE, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ita.2013.78.
Full textHuang, Jimmy Xiangji, Aijun An, and Qinmin Hu. "Medical search and classification tools for recommendation." In Proceeding of the 33rd international ACM SIGIR conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1835449.1835574.
Full textWilcox, Lauren, Steven Feiner, Noemie Elhadad, David Vawdrey, and Tran Tran. "Patient-Centered Tools for Medication Information Search." In 8th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. ICST, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2014.254975.
Full textReports on the topic "Search tools"
Saulibio, Myles V. Internet Resource Search Tools - Analyses and Assessment. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, January 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada324029.
Full textPaynter, Robin A., Celia Fiordalisi, Elizabeth Stoeger, Eileen Erinoff, Robin Featherstone, Christiane Voisin, and Gaelen P. Adam. A Prospective Comparison of Evidence Synthesis Search Strategies Developed With and Without Text-Mining Tools. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), March 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.23970/ahrqepcmethodsprospectivecomparison.
Full textHerzer, John A., and Pengchu Zhang. The Bird project: Using Big Data tools to support Search Analytics. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), January 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1505412.
Full textPaulins, V. Ann, Julie L. Hillery, and Aaron Sturgill. Using Personal Mission Statements and Codes of Ethics as Career Search Tools. Ames: Iowa State University, Digital Repository, November 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/itaa_proceedings-180814-64.
Full textCunha Da Silva, Alice. Summary Report for the SINBAD Search Tool Project. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), June 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1050340.
Full textBeveridge, J. R., Christopher Graves, and Christopher E. Lesher. Local Search as a Tool for Horizon Line Matching. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, December 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada308540.
Full textNodine, Calvin F. Computer-Assisted Visual Search/Decision Aids as a Training Tool for Mammography. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, July 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada396613.
Full textNodine, Calvin. Computer-Assisted Visual Search/Decision Aids as a Training Tool for Mammography. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, July 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada374215.
Full textNodine, Calvin. Computer-Assisted Visual Search/Decision Aids as a Training Tool for Mammography. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, July 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada358072.
Full textDy, Sydney M., Julie M. Waldfogel, Danetta H. Sloan, Valerie Cotter, Susan Hannum, JaAlah-Ai Heughan, Linda Chyr, et al. Integrating Palliative Care in Ambulatory Care of Noncancer Serious Chronic Illness: A Systematic Review. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), February 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.23970/ahrqepccer237.
Full text