Relevant bibliographies by topics / Self-attribution bias

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Book chapters

Academic literature on the topic 'Self-attribution bias'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 1 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Self-attribution bias.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Self-attribution bias"

1

Doukas, John A., and Dimitris Petmezas. "Acquisitions, Overconfident Managers and Self-attribution Bias." European Financial Management 13, no. 3 (June 2007): 531–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036x.2007.00371.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

van Elk, Michiel. "The self-attribution bias and paranormal beliefs." Consciousness and Cognition 49 (March 2017): 313–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2017.02.001.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Dunn, Dana S. "Demonstrating a Self-Serving Bias." Teaching of Psychology 16, no. 1 (February 1989): 21–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top1601_6.

Full text
Abstract:
A self-serving attributional bias is demonstrated in a classroom exercise. Students' self-descriptions reveal a bias toward reporting positive attributes, a result that allows for discussion of motivational and cognitive processes in attribution.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Czaja, Daniel, and Florian Röder. "Self-attribution bias and overconfidence among nonprofessional traders." Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 78 (November 2020): 186–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2020.02.003.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Cristofaro, Matteo, and Pier Luigi Giardino. "Core Self-Evaluations, Self-Leadership, and the Self-Serving Bias in Managerial Decision Making: A Laboratory Experiment." Administrative Sciences 10, no. 3 (September 3, 2020): 64. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/admsci10030064.

Full text
Abstract:
The self-leadership construct has received great attention from scholars over the last 40 years due to its capacity to influence personal effectiveness. However, despite strongly influencing individuals’ self-efficacy, performed studies did not determine whether self-leadership is connected, and how, with the Core-Self Evaluation (CSE) trait—a complex personality disposition based on self-efficacy, self-esteem, locus of control, and emotional stability—that has been found impacting decision-making processes within organizations. Moreover, it has not been identified whether individuals with a high level of self-leadership are more prone to be victims of some cognitive biases in decision-making processes, such as the internal attribution of successes and external attribution of failures (i.e., Self-Serving Bias, SSB) that are usually led by the strong belief of individuals in their own capacities. The outlined gaps can be substantiated by the following two research questions: “How is self-leadership related with CSE?” and “How does self-leadership influence the attribution of successes/failures?”. To answer these questions, the following were identified and analyzed for 93 executives: (i) the tendency in the attribution of successes and failures, (ii) the CSE, and (iii) their self-leadership level. Results show that: (i) a high level of CSE is connected with high levels of self-leadership; (ii) high levels of self-leadership bring individuals to the internal attribution of successes and external attribution of failures. This work reinforces the stream of (the few) studies that considers a high level of CSE and self-leadership as not always being desirable for managerial decision-making processes and consequent performance. This paper aims to enrich the debate concerning the relations between, on the one hand, self-leadership and, on the other hand, personality traits between self-leadership and decision making.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

이수남, Donghoon Lee, Bia Kim, and HyunJung Shin. "The Effect of Affect in Self-Serving Attribution Bias." Institute for Humanities and Social Sciences 17, no. 2 (May 2016): 1–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.15818/ihss.2016.17.2.1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Twardawski, Torsten, and Axel Kind. "Board Overconfidence in Mergers & Acquisitions: A Self-Attribution Bias." Academy of Management Proceedings 2016, no. 1 (January 2016): 18240. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2016.18240abstract.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Ong, Desmond C., Noah D. Goodman, and Jamil Zaki. "Happier than thou? A self-enhancement bias in emotion attribution." Emotion 18, no. 1 (February 2018): 116–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/emo0000309.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Bertella, Mario A., Felipe R. Pires, Henio H. A. Rego, Jonathas N. Silva, Irena Vodenska, and H. Eugene Stanley. "Confidence and self-attribution bias in an artificial stock market." PLOS ONE 12, no. 2 (February 23, 2017): e0172258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172258.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

van Dijk, Anouk, Sander Thomaes, Astrid M. G. Poorthuis, and Bram Orobio de Castro. "Can Self-Persuasion Reduce Hostile Attribution Bias in Young Children?" Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 47, no. 6 (December 4, 2018): 989–1000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10802-018-0499-2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Self-attribution bias"

1

Kunkel, Jennifer, and Kristina Chen. "Actor-observer effekten och bilkörning : Hur attribuerar människor beteenden vid riskabel bilkörning?" Thesis, Mälardalen University, School of Sustainable Development of Society and Technology, 2008. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-677.

Full text
Abstract:

Actor-observer bias är tendensen där människan som aktörer tillskriver sitt beteende till yttre omständigheter medan observatörer tenderar till att tillskriva aktörens beteende till personliga faktorer. Syftet med denna studie var att få en klarare bild av hur människor i sin roll som aktör eller observatör attribuerar ett riskabelt bilkörningsbeteende. Deltagarna bestod av 101 svenska studenter från en högskola i Mellansverige varav 77 stycken var kvinnor och 24 stycken var män. Deltagarna fick svara på en enkät angående actor-observer bias och riskfullt bilkörningsbeteende. Resultaten visade att andras beteende förklaras mer av personliga egenskaper än då personen själv kör riskfullt medan yttre omständigheter inte gav skillnad för vare sig andra eller en själv. Betydelsen av detta och implikationer för framtida forskning diskuterades.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Hsieh, Tasi-Hsiung, and 謝才雄. "The Impact of Self-Attribution Bias on Investors’ Overconfident Trading Behavior." Thesis, 2012. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/13768574572280735333.

Full text
Abstract:
碩士
國立臺灣大學
財務金融學研究所
100
This study focus on the investor overconfidence related to individual investors and institutional investors under the different information uncertainty levels and puts the self-attribution into the model. Self-attribution is composed of the investor sentiment index and the market return, and the difference of investor sentiment index is on behalf of the expectation of market’s future direction. When investors make the correct prediction on the future market return, investors should be more likely to have a tendency to be overconfident. During the sample period from 1981 to 2010 which was divided into 26 five-year sub-samples. In each five-year sub-sample period, the information uncertainty and institutional holding are the two variables used to divide the sample into 12 portfolios. Finally, to investigate whether there are significant differences in the investor overconfidence in the following situations, we set up five kinds of situations: (1) The prediction towards the market’s future return is correct or not (2) The market is bull-market or not (3) The market return is extremely high or not. The empirical results show that: (1) when the prediction of market''s future return is correct, most of the portfolios in the weekly data are showing that investor overconfidence is significant; (2) investors in a bull-market are more likely to have a tendency to be overconfident; (3) The investor overconfidence is not significant when the market return is extremely high of its distribution (4) In the different kinds of market circumstances, most of the investors are more likely to have a tendency to be overconfident in the higher information uncertainty portfolio; (5) In the different kinds of market circumstances, there is no conclusion that what kind of portfolio investors are more likely to have a tendency to be overconfident but in most of the circumstances, individual investors are more likely to have a tendency to be overconfident than institutional investors.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Self-attribution bias"

1

"Self-Attribution Bias." In Behavioral Finance and Wealth Management, 165–71. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781119202400.ch14.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

"Violent Self-narratives and the Hostile Attribution Bias." In Behavioural Analysis of Crime, 39–60. Routledge, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315568911-7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Rochat, Philippe. "Fundamental Attribution Error." In Moral Acrobatics, 75–78. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190057657.003.0014.

Full text
Abstract:
We live in a world that is greatly imagined and made of quick and dirty inferences, especially in the social domain that is mined with moral heuristics and other quick moral judgments. A major moral drift is the so-called fundamental attribution error or correspondence bias. This error consists in the propensity to erroneously explain and attribute strongly biased causes to the behaviors of self and others. At least in our individualistic Western cultures, we tend to make attribution and explain our as well as others’ behavior mainly in terms of dispositional features of the individual and much less in terms of the situation in which the person is embedded (e.g., her social class, economic resources, place in society, etc.).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Self-attribution bias' for particular source types:
Journal articles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography