Academic literature on the topic 'Sewage farming'

C, Nielsen V., Voorburg J. H, and L'Hermite P. 1936-, eds. Volatile emissions from livestock farming and sewage operations. Elsevier Applied Science, 1988.

Stevens, Daryl, Jim Kelly, Mike McLaughlin, and Murray Unkovich. Growing crops with reclaimed wastewater. CSIRO Pub., 2006.

Nielsen, V. C., and J. H. Voorburg. Odour Prevention and Control of Organic Sludge and Livestock Farming. Taylor & Francis Group, 1986.

Nielsen, V. C., and J. H. Voorburg. Odour Prevention and Control of Organic Sludge and Livestock Farming. Taylor & Francis Group, 1986.

Nielsen, V. C., and J. H. Voorburg. Odour Prevention and Control of Organic Sludge and Livestock Farming. Taylor & Francis Group, 1986.

Nielsen, V. C., and J. H. Voorburg. Odour Prevention and Control of Organic Sludge and Livestock Farming. Taylor & Francis Group, 2011.

Chayon ŭl kkum kkunŭn twikkan. Tŭllyŏk, 2000.

Kajitvichyanukul, Puangrat, and Brian D'Arcy, eds. Land Use and Water Quality: The Impacts of Diffuse Pollution. IWA Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/9781789061123.

Mundoli, Seema, C. S. Dechamma, Madhureema Auddy, Abhiri Sanfui, and Harini Nagendra. "A New Imagination for Waste and Water in India’s Peri-Urban Interface." In Water Security, Conflict and Cooperation in Peri-Urban South Asia. Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79035-6_2.

Shenoy, Rashmi S., Prathibha Narayanan, and Savithri Bhat. "Emerging Technologies for Separation and Recycle of Phosphorous from Sewage Sludge for Hydroponic Farming System." In Biorefinery for Water and Wastewater Treatment. Springer International Publishing, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20822-5_12.

Mabhaudhi, Tafadzwanashe, T. L. Dirwai, C. Taguta, E. K. Kanda, L. Nhamo, and O. Cofie. "Irrigation Development and Agricultural Water Management in Rwanda: A Systematic Review." In Enhancing Water and Food Security Through Improved Agricultural Water Productivity. Springer Nature Singapore, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-1848-4_16.

"Box 3.3 Sewage and farming in Hubli-Dharwad." In Rural-Urban Interaction in the Developing World. Routledge, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203646274-20.

"(3) Commission of the European Communities. COST project 68 ter. Final Reports of the Community COST Concertation Committee. 1983. (4) Department of the Environment/National Water Council Standing Committee on the Disposal of Sewage Sludge. Sewage Sludge Survey 1980 Data. Department of the Environment 1983. (5) Anaerobic digestion of Sewage Sludge and Organic Agricultural Waste. Proceedings of a COST 681 Workshop held in Athens May 1984. (In the Press). (6) EIKUM, A.S., and BERG, N. Odour characterisation and removal of odours from facilities receiving septage. To be published in Review Papers on Sewage Sludge Processing, 1985. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels." In Odour Prevention and Control of Organic Sludge and Livestock Farming. CRC Press, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781482286311-15.

Bhardwaj, L. K., P. Rath, H. Jain, and M. Choudhury. "A comprehensive review of wetlands in India and their conservation." In Nature-Based Technologies for Wastewater Treatment and Bioenergy Production. IWA Publishing, 2025. https://doi.org/10.2166/9781789064100_0043.

"COST 68 bis was more extensive in scope than the initial project since it covered both treatment and use of sewage sludge. This meant that the topics included both the engineering and economics aspects of sludge processing at sewage works and the environmental aspects of sludge disposal particularly in regard to its utilisation as a fertilizer in agriculture. The use of sewage sludge in this way is important in most countries and it was recognised that co-ordinated research was desirable into both the possible adverse environmental effects of heavy metals and pathogens in sludges and the beneficial effects of plant nutrients in sludge. The problem of odour nuisance arising from the handling and spreading of sewage sludge was also recognised as an important subject-area for research. Under COST 68 bis, five Working Parties were established to co-ordinate the various areas of research. As a 'Concerted Action1, no direct funding was available from the European Commission to finance research projects on sewage sludge, each country being expected to contribute its own publicly-funded projects to the common ’pool*. COST 68 bis ran from 1977 to 1980(2) and was followed by an extension programme - COST 68 ter - which ran from 1981 to 1983(3). In 1983, it was decided to further extend this Concerted Action but to widen the range of research topics in the scientific programme to include animal manures. The renewed programme was designated COST Project 681 'Treatment and Use of Organic Sludges and Liquid Agricultural Wastes'. It is obvious that sewage sludges and farm manures have many aspects in common particularly with regard to handling and treatment techniques and to the environmental impact (e.g. odour) which can occur from their utilisation on land. On the other hand, from the administrative point of view, sewage sludge and farm manures are in two different 'worlds'. Sewage sludge is the general responsibility of public authorities while responsibility for disposing of animal manures belong mainly to the private farming sector. Funding for research on the two types of waste, even if from Government sources, is usually from different Departments and there is little cross-involvement of research scientists in the two sectors. Nonetheless, the COST 681 activity is attempting to promote some co-ordination of effort between the two research areas and, hopefully, this will result in mutual benefit to both those authorities responsible for sewage sludge treatment and those concerned with farm manures and their disposal. This joint Workshop on 'odours' is a good example of the type of co-operation, and sharing of information on a common problem, which can be of great mutual benefit to both sectors. PARTICIPATING COUNTRIES." In Odour Prevention and Control of Organic Sludge and Livestock Farming. CRC Press, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781482286311-11.

"different aspects of slurry disposal, for example, spreading, and odour from land after spreading. Correlation work to establish which fractions are best remains to be done, and will probably involve chemical analysis. It is clear then, that the concept of Odour Potential of a sludge or slurry can be a useful tool not only to the odour specialist but also to the operators of sewage treatment works and agricultural slurry handling facilities in minimising the nuisance from the disposal of sludges. (1 j GILLARD, F. ’Measurements of odours by dynamic olfactometry; application to the steel and carbonisation industries." Paper presented at internation symposium: Characterisation and control of odoriferous pollutants in process industries, Belgian Filtration Society, Louvain-La-Neuve, April 1984. (2) TOOGOOD, S. J., and HOBSON, J.A. ’The Discharge of Volatile M rials to Sewers", Water Research Centre, Technical Report TR142, England, 1979. (5) Commission of European Communities, ’The use of Sewage Sludge in Agriculture’, Draft Directive, November 1981. (6) HURLEY, B. J., and RACHWAL, A. J. "Reducing Sludge Volune" Effluent and Water Treatment Journal, 21» 292-296, 1981." In Odour Prevention and Control of Organic Sludge and Livestock Farming. CRC Press, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781482286311-66.

van Santen, Rutger, Djan Khoe, and Bram Vermeer. "Water for Life." In 2030. Oxford University Press, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195377170.003.0008.

"In any case, covering may be impracticable for other reasons. Many processes as they are currently designed depend upon at least visual access by operators for process control, and in other instances the production of odorous chemicals such as hydrogen sulphide can be accompanied by the formation of methane, giving a potential fire or explosion hazard. 1.1.1. Odours .from the Spreading of Sludge and Slurries on Land The chimney, originally devised to increase draught through fires and to provide smoke extraction, has found extensive use in many industries to aid the dispersion of odour. The extra height gained by the point of emission is frequently enough to give the extra dilution required to reduce the risk of odour nuisance at even relatively nearby properties. This is an option that is not open to the farmer or the sewage works operator. The cost and practicability of enclosing the processes used in sewage treatment varies considerably, but in the disposal of sludge or animal slurries to land there is never a realistic option that the dispersion of odours once transferred to the gas phase might be effectively controlled. For the prevention of nuisance therefore there are two possibili­ ties. First, the formation or release of odorous chemical species can be discouraged. In practice this usually means the prevention of reducing conditions (negative redox potential) and possibly the prior removal of certain key compounds. Second, the time of contact between the sludge/ slurry and the air can be reduced, for example by ploughing in or sub-surface injection, and the act of spreading can be timed to coincide with favourable atmospheric conditions. These two approaches can of course be used in combination. Both approaches naturally add to the cost of sludge disposal, and for the sewage works manager add to the risk that farmers might be less willing to accept sludge to land, causing a greater problem still. For the fanner, sewage sludge can be a useful source of cheap nitrogen, though of unspecified strength, and also of much needed soil structure, but the imposition of no-grazing periods after application can add to the cost taken as a whole. A further problem, especially for farmers with arable crops is that the demand for soil nutrients and the practicability of spreading and ploughing in are seasonal, whereas a sludge and slurry are produced at a more or less constant rate. In the case of slurries, seme form of storage is inevitable, and commonly takes place in open pits. Scxne digestion and therefore stabilisation takes place during storage, reducing the capacity of the slurry to cause odour nuisance, and as long as the surface crust is not disturbed, little odour results. It is the emptying of slurry pits that gives rise to the release of odour. 2. P rin ciple, Sources, of Odour at .^ weg e .lreatment Works." In Odour Prevention and Control of Organic Sludge and Livestock Farming. CRC Press, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781482286311-58.

Kuusik, Argo, Karin Pachel, Aare Kuusik, and Enn Loigu. "Anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge with fish farming waste." In The 9th International Conference "Environmental Engineering 2014". Vilnius Gediminas Technical University Press “Technika” 2014, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/enviro.2014.084.

KEMESIUS, Martynas, Gerda SILINGIENE, Regina VASINAUSKIENE, and Remigijus ZALKAUSKAS. "THE INFLUENCE OF SEWAGE SLUDGE ON NORWAY SPRUCE (PICEA ABIES (L.) H. KARST.) SEEDLINGS GROWTH." In Rural Development 2015. Aleksandras Stulginskis University, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.15544/rd.2015.079.

Huppmann, Gerhard. "The MTU Carbonate Fuel Cell HotModule®: Utilization of Biomass and Waste Originated Fuels for Polygeneration in Fuel Cells." In ASME 2006 4th International Conference on Fuel Cell Science, Engineering and Technology. ASMEDC, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/fuelcell2006-97120.

Cauduro, Ma´rcia. "Plan of Communications and Relationship With Third Parties for the Bolivia-Brazil Pipeline Right-of-Way." In 2010 8th International Pipeline Conference. ASMEDC, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/ipc2010-31603.

Bonchkovskyi, Andrii. "Assessment of anthropogenic pressure by nutrients and organic substances in the Sula river basin." In International Conference of Young Scientists on Meteorology, Hydrology and Environmental Monitoring. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.15407/icys-mhem.2023.029.