Academic literature on the topic 'Shakespeare, William, 1564-1616 – Tragedies'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Shakespeare, William, 1564-1616 – Tragedies.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Shakespeare, William, 1564-1616 – Tragedies"
Cotterill. "William Shakespeare (1564-1616)." Clinical and Experimental Dermatology 25, no. 1 (January 2000): 93–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2230.2000.0580g.x.
Full textDa Universidade Coimbra, Biblioteca Geral. "William Shakespeare (1564-1616)." Boletim da Biblioteca da Universidade de Coimbra, no. 46/47 (December 22, 2016): 305–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.14195/1647-8436_46_47_20.
Full textDa Universidade Coimbra, Biblioteca Geral. "William Shakespeare (1564-1616)." Boletim da Biblioteca Geral da Universidade de Coimbra, no. 46/47 (December 22, 2016): 305–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.14195/2184-7681_46_47_20.
Full textRössner, Stephan. "William Shakespeare (1564-1616)." Obesity Reviews 9, no. 5 (August 11, 2008): 508–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-789x.2008.00474.x.
Full textGupton, Janet L. "The Complete Works of William Shakespeare, and: William Shakespeare, 1564-1616 (review)." Theatre Journal 51, no. 4 (1999): 482–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/tj.1999.0086.
Full textBertin, Marilise Rezende. "O erótico, o chulo e o obsceno em traduções e adaptações de William Shakespeare: Hamlet, Romeu e Julieta e Otelo." Cadernos de Literatura em Tradução, no. 10 (August 1, 2009): 47–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/issn.2359-5388.i10p47-70.
Full textGomes, Marleide da Mota. "Shakespeare’s: his 450th birth anniversary and his insights into neurology and cognition." Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria 73, no. 4 (April 2015): 359–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0004-282x20150023.
Full textRathore, Dr Madhvi, and Prabha Prabha Gour. "The Exploration of the Postcolonial Essence in The Tempest." SMART MOVES JOURNAL IJELLH 8, no. 2 (February 28, 2020): 14. http://dx.doi.org/10.24113/ijellh.v8i2.10429.
Full textRobert Bearman. "The Life and Times of William Shakespeare, 1564-1616 (review)." Shakespeare Quarterly 59, no. 3 (2008): 335–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/shq.0.0016.
Full textDolinin, Alexander. "Итальянские мотивы в поэме Пушкина «Анджело» [Italian Motifs in Pushkin’s Poem _Andzhelo_]." Slavica Revalensia 8 (2021): 289–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.22601/sr.2021.08.10.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Shakespeare, William, 1564-1616 – Tragedies"
Walworth, Alan M. (Alan Marshall). "A Challenge to Charles Lamb's "On the Tragedies of Shakespeare"." Thesis, University of North Texas, 1990. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc504543/.
Full textSaavedra, Claudia Carla Echenique 1962. "Shakespeare além do espaco tempo : uma conversa sobre direitos humanos nas tragedias Titus Andronicus, Ricardo III e Macbeth." [s.n.], 2014. http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/285241.
Full textTese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Artes
Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-26T05:11:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Saavedra_ClaudiaCarlaEchenique_D.pdf: 8077044 bytes, checksum: 8547a9c2f2c589fa4b2ad2d839809ca7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014
Resumo: Esta tese investiga três tragédias de William Shakespeare: Tito Andrônico, Ricardo III e Macbeth, e sua relação com a construção e defesa dos direitos humanos no mundo contemporâneo. Nós estabelecemos que tanto as narrativas como o discurso das realidades apresentadas nessas tragédias elisabetanas, oferecem um material que, mediado por o corpo total, dos atores e que, expostos diante da assembléia por meio de sua atualização teatral, contribuem para a compreensão de como operam, tanto os mecanismos de poder como o circulo trágico da vingança gerando violência. Postulamos que, elaboradas em comunidade, essas obras, educam e fornecem um terreno fértil para a elaboração da memória coletiva e, assim, alcançar uma compreensão compartilhada dos fenômenos que afetam nossas convivências latino-americanas
Abstract: The present study involves research on the construction and defense of Human Rights through an analysis of William Shakespeare¿s three tragedies: Tito Andronicus, Richard III, and Macbeth, in the context of contemporary Latinamerica. We establish that both narrative and discourse and the realities presented in these Elizabethan tragedies, mediated through the "total bodies" of actors exposed to the assembly, allow a deep comprehension of how power mechanisms operate and how violence and revenge circulate in society. These plays elicit in the community a sense of pity for the pain of others and thus help us reach a shared understanding of vital issues that affect societies in Latinamrica. We believe that Aristotelic catharsis and Brechtian estrangement may occur simultaneously, experienced as emotive consciousness
Doutorado
Artes Cenicas
Doutora em Artes
Closel, Régis Augustus Bars 1985. "Diálogos Miméticos entre Sêneca e Shakespeare = As Troianas e Ricardo III." [s.n.], 2011. http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/270174.
Full textDissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Estudos da Linguagem
Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-19T08:54:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Closel_RegisAugustusBars_M.pdf: 2038312 bytes, checksum: 7c1b1af36416b37e4e7597571df3f57d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011
Resumo: A presente dissertação tem por objetivo propor um diálogo entre duas obras dramáticas de grande significância, Ricardo III e As Troianas, no cânone de seus autores, respectivamente, William Shakespeare (1564 - 1616) e Lucius Annaeus Sêneca (4 a.C - 65 d.C). A premissa inicial é a relação tradicional entre ambos, que atribui ao tragediógrafo elisabetano uma influência textual, temática e estilística originária do filósofo e tragediógrafo latino. Para o estudo dessas relações, limitadas ao escopo de duas obras, o trabalho foi dividido em três partes. No primeiro capítulo é realizado um percurso sobre toda a historiografia da crítica da influência que Sêneca teria exercido sobre os dramaturgos que escreveram durante a segunda metade do século XVI, na Inglaterra. Observa-se, principalmente, como a visão e a metodologia de se tratar o tema da influência se altera, ao longo dos anos, chegando, por exemplo, a ser negada por alguns críticos durante certo tempo, além da observação do delineamento do próprio objeto. Toma-se o cuidado, durante todo o trabalho de não fazer opção a favor ou negar a presença de Sêneca para não incorrer em extremismos. No segundo capítulo, busca-se, com base nos resultados do primeiro capítulo, a leitura histórica dos elementos temáticos e estilísticos lidos como derivados de ou influenciados por Sêneca. Neste ponto o foco distancia-se do campo de discussão crítica do fenômeno para o campo de crítica histórico-literária e os objetos focados, agora, são exatamente aqueles que anteriormente foram levantados como ?"senequianos". No terceiro capítulo, conhecida a história da influência e tendo sido feita uma gama de opções e leituras sobre a época de Shakespeare, inicia-se a leitura das duas obras. Tal abordagem preambular se fez necessária para que houvesse um embasamento tanto da crítica da discussão da influência, como da leitura histórica da cultura que produziu Ricardo III. Foi feita a opção de seguir com a leitura de René Girard sobre os conceitos de Teoria Mimética e Crise de Diferenças, pois tocam em noções basilares do mundo Elisabetano, apresentando, portanto, uma atmosfera na qual os diálogos poderiam situar relações de aproximação e afastamento entre a dupla de obras escolhida. Observa-se uma leitura mítica, muito rica politicamente, ao trabalhar com a história/mito conhecidos por ambas as obras
Abstract: This dissertation aims to propose a dialogue between two dramatic works of great importance, Richard III and Trojan Women, both canonic for their authors, respectively, William Shakespeare (1564 - 1616) and Lucius Annaeus Seneca (4 BC - 65 AD). The initial premise is the traditional relationship between them, which presupposes that the Elizabethan tragedies have textual, thematic and stylistic influence of the Latin philosopher and tragedian. In order to study these relationships, restricted to the scope of the two referred plays, the dissertation was divided into three parts. The first chapter is about Seneca's influence on playwrights who wrote along the second half of the sixteenth century in England. It focuses mainly the vision and methodology used to study the issue of influence and changes of views over the years, reaching, for example, the fact that the influence was denied by some critics for some time. It also observes the outline of the object - the relation between plays - itself. Along these considerations, I was aware that I should not propose or deny the influence of Seneca in order not to incur in extremism. The second chapter, based on the results of the first chapter, seeks to read the historical interpretation of stylistic and thematic elements as derived from or influenced by Seneca. At this point, the analysis moves away from the critical discussion to approach the field of historical and literary criticism. The focused objects are exactly those that have previously been raised as "senequians", like the blank verse, the tyrant and the presence of ghosts. In the third chapter begins the interpretation of both tragedies. This preliminary approach was necessary in order to have a critical foundation for the discussion of influence, as that one produced by historical reading of Richard III. The mimetic theory of René Girard and the Crisis of Differences offered fundamental notions for the Elizabethan world, which presented interlocution between both tragedies, so that it was possible to examine approaches and distances between the two chosen plays. It was observed a very rich mythical and political relation among the plays using the known versions of history/myth
Mestrado
Teoria e Critica Literaria
Mestre em Teoria e História Literária
Mezghanni, Miriam. "Unsettling heroines : towards a cognitive poetics exploration of power dynamics (Ophelia, Lady Macbeth, Desdemona and Cleopatra as case studies)." Thesis, Montpellier 3, 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016MON30015.
Full textThe Shakespearean tragic heroines are a polemical topic. Critics are divided between a reading that describes them as complex and dynamic protagonists and a reading that sees their presence as ornamental and paper-thin in the Shakespearean dramatic tradition. This study examines tenets of power within four major tragic figures, Ophelia, Desdemona, Lady Macbeth, and Cleopatra. Conversation analysis and disciplines from cognitive poetics, text world theory and conceptual metaphor analysis, will be used to study these characters’ utterances and thoughts. The research shows that Ophelia, Desdemona, Lady Macbeth, and Cleopatra are actively involved in power relations. They manifest dominance, exercise resistance, and sow dissidence within masculine narratives of authority. The conclusion can also be drawn that the Shakespearean tragic heroine succeeds in breaking through patriarchal embargo, embraces power, and inaugurates a distinctive concept of female heroism
Srigley, Michael. "Images of regeneration : a study of Shakespeare's "The Tempest" and its cultural background /." Stockholm : Almqvist och Wiksell, 1985. http://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb348248795.
Full textSmith, Cristiane Busato. "Representações da Ofélia de Shakespeare na Inglaterra Vitoriana." reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFPR, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/1884/23026.
Full textVillaça-Bergeron, Maud. "Shakespeare et la transmission des classiques grecs : influences de la mythographie et de la tragédie attique dans Hamlet, Macbeth et King Lear de William Shakespeare." Caen, 2010. http://www.theses.fr/2010CAEN1587.
Full textThe main objective of this dissertation is to consider the possibility of a Greek influence, namely mythology and tragedy, on Shakespeare's masterpieces Hamlet, Macbethand KingLear. This study first draws an impartial account of the current knowledge concerning Shakespeare's supposed education and of the major role played by Byzantine scholarship in the rediscovery of Greek texts which led to a huge wave of translations into Latin first and then into the vernaculars. The second part tries to establish textual and thematic correlations between Shakespeare's works and some Attic plays together with the epics of Homer and several other ancient Greek authors by picking passages drawn from both sides and explaining the common point between them. Finally, the third part deals with the place Shakespeare gave his main heroines in these plays, a place which corresponds in some significant aspects to the Greek tragic heroine
Crohem, Laurence. ""My single self" : paradoxes du singulier dans All's well that ends well, Hamlet, Julius Caesar, Measure for Measure et Troilus and Cressida de William Shakespeare." Lille 3, 2009. http://www.theses.fr/2009LIL30057.
Full textIs every human being unique ? Five Shakespeare plays sometimes labelled problem plays - All's well that Ends Well, Hamlet, Julius Caesar Measure for Measure and Troilus and Cressida - raise the issue of the singularity or uniqueness of the self, one aspect of the question of the subject in the early modern age. Uniqueness is in crisis in these plays : the study of the substitutions in action, love and death shows the absence of the self and the emergence of doubles instead of the expected proofs of uniqueness. This study of the scenes of perception of singularity and of self-speaking in the dialogues or soliloquies shows confused identities : the unique self flickers and is superseded by doubles. The crisis of uniqueness also questions the link to social and inner space and to temporality. The subjects dissolve into the community and fail to draw borders between themselves and others. The veils supposed to unveil an intimate space uncover a place of paradox. Perspective effects displace the watching character, who is then deprived of a proper place, and the return of the political reestablishes set places. The subjects wish to engage in a linear time which is deconstructed by repetitions. They do no build a proper linear history but present themselves as traces of events that did not happen and make up an impossible present. There is no time for oneself : Hamlet, the victim of agentless action and of unmastered duration, lives and dies the lives and deaths of others in the time of others. The dramatic art of space and time in the problem plays is linked to the paradoxes of singularity that question the relationship between oneself and the other and to the other in oneself
Claret, Jean-Louis. "Le traitement de la révélation dans trois tragédies de Shakespeare : "Hamlet", "Le roi Lear", "Macbeth" : la clairvoyance sublime de l'égarement." Nancy 2, 1995. http://www.theses.fr/1995NAN21009.
Full textThe heroes of the great tragedies of Shakespeare lose their way and manage, thanks to this drift organized by the playwright, to transcend their nature and attain to a precious knowledge. They leave the darkness of their world and rise to a bright light which enables them to take a new look at the meaning of human experience. Hamlet sinks into the quicksands of his consciousness, Lear is overcome by madness and Macbeth commits himself body and soul to evil. These three characters fascinate owing to the greatness they are endowed with at the end of their course and to the mystery they are shrouded in. Their fates are approached in terms of dramatic writing technique: Shakespeare does not introduce us to men but to 'word creatures' and all that happens to them is nothing but the image of a destiny. The theatre obeys its own rules and the analysis of the words; along with the relation to the spectators are the be-all and end-all of the method the critic must use. The audience attends the disintegration of characters that suddenly grow in stature as they realize how meaningless man's life is. This recognition (anagnorisis in Greek) proves pointless in that the dramatis personae are unable to take advantage of that painful revelation. The public, included in the performance thanks to breathtaking mirroring effects, are the only people who can actually draw
Segurado, Nunes Livia. "Popular Shakespeare : Brazilian reappropriations." Thesis, Aix-Marseille, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017AIXM0364.
Full textThis thesis is the result of an interdisciplinary research at the crossroads of anthropology and literary, comparative, and performance studies. Brazilian "popular" theatre productions of Shakespeare are an unusual object of study that is also ephemeral, constantly changing, combining circus arts, religious fervour, and carnival traditions. Shakespeare was introduced in Brazil through its elites, who attended performances adapted from translations/rewritings by the French Jean-François Ducis. In 1928, the "Anthropophagous Manifesto" written by Oswald de Andrade permanently changed Brazilian mentality: Brazil then truly emancipated from its former status as a colony to cannibalise European traditions and promote its mixed nature. Shakespeare has thus been completely reinvented by a changing country. Today, Brazilian productions are reappropriating Shakespeare as an icon of erudite culture in order to legitimise popular culture and to resist the imposition of a cultural hierarchy by the elites. They have been so successful that, in an ironic turn, they now export their own theatrical productions abroad
Books on the topic "Shakespeare, William, 1564-1616 – Tragedies"
Harold, Bloom, ed. Shakespeare's tragedies. Broomall, PA: Chelsea House Publishers, 2000.
Find full textSmidt, Kristian. Unconformities in Shakespeare's tragedies. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan, 1989.
Find full textSmidt, Kristian. Unconformities in Shakespeare's tragedies. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1989.
Find full textSmidt, Kristian. Unconformities in Shakespeare's tragedies. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1990.
Find full textKuiper, Kathleen. The tragedies of William Shakespeare. New York: Rosen Pub., 2013.
Find full text1936-, Young David, ed. Shakespeare's middle tragedies: A collection of critical essays. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall, 1993.
Find full textGreenblatt, Stephen. Shakespeare Tragedies. Norton & Company, Incorporated, W. W., 2002.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Shakespeare, William, 1564-1616 – Tragedies"
Casey, Francis. "William Shakespeare 1564–1616." In King Lear by William Shakespeare, 1–6. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08342-8_1.
Full text"William Shakespeare (1564–1616)." In The Routledge Anthology of Poets on Poets, 112–29. Routledge, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203360118-11.
Full textSimonton, D. K. "William Shakespeare 1564–1616." In Encyclopedia of Creativity, e72-e75. Elsevier, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-375038-9.00198-9.
Full text"William Shakespeare (1564–1616)." In London, 85–94. Harvard University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv22jnsm7.23.
Full textSautter, Udo. "William Shakespeare (1564–1616)." In Die 101 wichtigsten Personen der Weltgeschichte, 57. C.H.Beck, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.17104/9783406679483-57.
Full text"Shakespeare, William (1564–1616)." In Encyclopedia of Lesbian and Gay Histories and Cultures, 1323–25. Garland Science, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203487884-154.
Full text"William Shakespeare (1564–1616)." In Early Modern Sonneteers, 50–63. Liverpool University Press, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/jj.3079181.15.
Full textBauer, Mark S. "William Shakespeare (1564–1616)." In A Mind Apart, 53. Oxford University PressNew York, NY, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195336405.003.0009.
Full textHolland, Peter. "Background, early life, and marriage." In William Shakespeare, 1–11. Oxford University PressOxford, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199212835.003.0001.
Full text"William Shakespeare (1564–1616) from Henry VI, Part II." In London, 85–86. Harvard University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.4159/9780674273702-022.
Full text