Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Sino-Soviet Split

Contents

Journal articles
Dissertations / Theses
Books
Book chapters

Academic literature on the topic 'Sino-Soviet Split'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 27 April 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Sino-Soviet Split.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Sino-Soviet Split"

1

Leese, Daniel. "Identity Discourses and the Sino-Soviet Split." Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History 16, no. 4 (2015): 988–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/kri.2015.0057.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Roberts, Priscilla, Steven I. Levine, Péter Vámos, Deborah Kaple, Jeremy Friedman, Douglas A. Stiffler, and Lorenz Lüthi. "FORUM: Mao, Khrushchev, and China's Split with the USSR: Perspectives on The Sino-Soviet Split." Journal of Cold War Studies 12, no. 1 (January 2010): 120–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jcws.2010.12.1.120.

Full text

Abstract:

This forum includes six commentaries on Lorenz M. Lüthi's book The Sino-Soviet Split: Cold War in the Communist World, published by Princeton University Press in 2008. Drawing on recently declassified documents and memoirs from numerous countries, Lüthi explains how and why the close alliance between the Soviet Union and the People's Republic of China fell apart in a remarkably short time, dissolving into fierce mutual enmity. Amassing a wealth of evidence, Lüthi stresses the role of ideology in the split, lending support to the arguments put forth nearly five decades ago by analysts like Donald Zagoria in his pioneering book on the Sino-Soviet rift. Six leading experts on Chinese foreign policy and Sino-Soviet relations discuss the strengths of Lüthi's book but also raise questions about some interpretations and omissions. The forum includes Lüthi's reply to the commentaries.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Keith, Ronald C. "Revisiting Ideology's Role in the Sino-Soviet Split." Diplomatic History 34, no. 3 (June 2010): 619–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7709.2010.00877.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Xia, Yafeng. "Mao's China and the Sino-Soviet Split: Ideological Dilemma." Journal of Cold War Studies 16, no. 4 (October 2014): 260–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jcws_r_00495.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Schelchkov, Andrey. "Communist movement in Argentina and the Sino-Soviet split." Latinskaia Amerika, no. 5 (2020): 66–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.31857/s0044748x0009124-5.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Whibley, James. "Mao's China and the Sino-Soviet Split: Ideological Dilemma." Asian Journal of Political Science 20, no. 3 (December 2012): 326–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2012.748973.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Cheng, Yinghong. "Sino-Cuban Relations during the Early Years of the Castro Regime, 1959–1966." Journal of Cold War Studies 9, no. 3 (July 2007): 78–114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jcws.2007.9.3.78.

Full text

Abstract:

China's relations with Cuba in the first half of the 1960s—when the Sino-Soviet split was rapidly intensifying—were important to both Beijing and Havana as well as to the world Communist movement. The Sino-Cuban relationship during this period moved from one of intimate comradeship to deterioration and finally a bitter separation. Although Fidel Castro's ties with Mao Zedong survived the immediate start of the Sino-Soviet rift, Castro's dependence on the Soviet Union ultimately doomed his courtship of China. Castro's vehemently anti-Chinese speech in March 1966 marked the end of Sino-Cuban amity. The Sino-Cuban case sheds valuable light on the tensions that bedeviled the international Communist movement after the Sino-Soviet divide flared to the surface.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Croitor, Mihai. "The beginning of the Sino-Soviet Split: two different approaches." Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Historia 62, no. 1 (December 30, 2017): 60–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.24193/subbhist.2017.2.05.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Shiwen, Wang. "The Sino-Soviet split: Cold War in the communist world." Cold War History 9, no. 4 (November 2009): 525–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14682740903268586.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Moody, Peter R. "Book review: Mao’s China and the Sino-Soviet Split: Ideological Dilemma." China Information 27, no. 1 (March 2013): 133–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0920203x12472012e.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Sino-Soviet Split"

1

Li, Mingjiang. "Turbulent years Mao's China and Sino-Soviet split /." 2007. http://catalog.hathitrust.org/api/volumes/oclc/232360099.html.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Crean, Jeffrey 1977. "The Turning Point: Perceptions and Policies Concerning Communist China during the Kennedy Years." Thesis, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/148381.

Full text

Abstract:

When analyzing the policies of the John F. Kennedy administration towards the People’s Republic of China, previous historians have focused on the lack of substantive change, emphasizing the continuity of action with the prior polices of the Dwight D. Eisenhower administration. At the same time, a number of historians have noted that it was during the years Kennedy was in office that a majority of the American people began viewing communist China as a greater threat to world peace than the Soviet Union. However, none have sought to explain this sizeable shift in public opinion, or analyze its potential impact on policy. This thesis incorporates archival materials with contemporary print and visual media to make a connection between the sources of public opinion shifts and a change in the assumptions upon which U.S. China policy was based. Almost from the moment the new president assumed office, Robert Komer at the National Security Council and Chester Bowles at the State Department began pushing for changes in China policy based on the assumptions that the communist regime was not a “passing phase,” would only become more powerful and over time constitute an inexorable greater threat to U.S. interests in Asia, and that rapprochement, rather than isolation, was the best means of ameliorating this threat. Together with James Thomson, Roger Hilsman, and eventually Walt Rostow, they pushed for the adoption of what A. Doak Barnett would later term “Containment Without Isolation.” While the Sino-Soviet split accentuated charges of Chinese anti-white racism and the Great Leap Forward reinforced the sense of Mao’s irrationality, the Sino-Indian War confirmed both rising Chinese power and their leadership’s capacity for rational calculation. Meanwhile, in the popular culture, particularly motion pictures, the Yellow Peril enjoyed a revival as Chinese villains stepped to the fore, beginning to free themselves of their Soviet masters. However, while foreign Chinese were feared as never before, Chinese in America gained new acceptance. Laying the groundwork for the next five decades of China policy and enemy images, Kennedy’s Thousand Days constituted a turning point.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Osiac, Alina Floriana. "Sino-Romanian ties before and after 1989: A special relation revisited." 2018. https://ul.qucosa.de/id/qucosa%3A35171.

Full text

Abstract:

The study deals with the Sino-Romanian political, diplomatic, economic, technological and cultural ties from the very beginning in 1880, to this day. It precisely attempts to illustrate how, following Romania's bitter transition to democracy in 1989 and during its process of Westernisation and presence in a global context for internationalisation, the Sino-Romanian bilateral relationship has undoubtedly deteriorated, in comparison to the period prior to the revolution when the two countries’ constantly expanding bilateral political and economic partnership, as well as their public support, enabled Bucharest to attenuate the Soviet economic pressure, to improve its autonomous policy towards the Communist Party of the Soviet Union and to undergo processes that resulted in the Romanian Communist Party sharing brotherly relations with the Communist Party of China in the 1970s. The research investigated the Romanian anti-communist revolution of December 1989 as the watershed for the Sino-Romanian relationship as, in the wake of those events, China embarked on the road of becoming a global superpower while the government in Bucharest, struggling economically, politically and socially to cope with the reverberations of the regime change, utterly disregarded the Asian capital’s economic and military potential as well as diplomatic influence in the international arena, and eventually turned its eyes to the West. The work emphasised that, when compared to other CEECs trade with China, Romania only ranked 5th, preceded by Hungary, Poland, the Czech Republic and Slovakia, suggesting that previous academic research - that placed emphasis on the traditional friendly relations which the two countries have shared since the 1960s and that has yielded, beginning with the 2000s, to a steady development of the Sino- Romanian pragmatic cooperation - and statements of (former) diplomats or experts working in the field - that tend to overemphasise the outcomes of the bilateral ties between Romania and China in the 2000s - are either too optimistic, or unfounded. The research established that the lessening of the Sino-Romanian collaboration after 1989 resides in Bucharest leadership’s inefficiency in developing a strategic partnership with Beijing subsequent to Romania’s accession to NATO (2004) and the EU (2007) and in their hesitation in capitalising on the rising Chinese economic presence in CEE since the beginning of the new millennium.:I. Introduction II. Historical background and Sino-Romanian earliest ties III. Sino-Romanian relations 1949-1969 IV. Sino-Romanian relations 1969-1989 V. Sino-Romanian relations 1989-2004 VI. Sino-Romanian relations 2004-2016 VII. Conclusion Annexes Bibliography

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Crhák, Ondřej. "Postoj Československa k vývoji čínsko-sovětských vztahů v 50. a 60. letech 20. století." Master's thesis, 2017. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-369808.

Full text

Abstract:

This thesis discusses the role of Czechoslovakia within the framework of the Chinese- Soviet split. Based on the analysis of archival sources, it explores Czechoslovak proceedings within the given issue at the diplomatic level as well as the Communist Party level. Its aim is to confirm or disprove the statement that Czechoslovakia was a so-called small player in this dispute and acted more independently on the USSR policy . It focuses on mutual Czechoslovak-Chinese relations and their development in the given period, i.e. 1950-1969. It analyzes the progress of the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia from its viewpoint at international conferences of Communist and workers' organizations, but also at Party sessions. The thesis also describes the Chinese-Soviet split in the Third World and its influence on Czechoslovak policy. Last but not least, the thesis focuses on the factors that influenced the formation of the Czechoslovak attitude on this issue. The thesis studies given range of issues with the help of archival sources of Czech provenance and foreign materials available in electronic form.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Panák, Břetislav. "Čínsko-sovětská roztržka, 1958-1964." Master's thesis, 2015. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-347837.

Full text

Abstract:

The Sino-Soviet Split of the late 1950s and the beginning of the 1960s was a multidimensional crisis of nationalism, national interests, domestic politics, personal problems, cultural differences, border issues, Soviet-American détente, communication misunderstanding, and different interpretations of ideology. The goal of this diploma thesis is to analyse the important domestic and foreign factors which contributed to the worsening of Sino-Soviet relations. In this interdisciplinary study, the author wants to over bridge the differences between Diplomatic History and International Relations Theory, the subfields of History and Political Science. In the first part, there is an analysis of current Sino-Soviet Split historiography (Lorenz Lüthi, Sergey Radchenko, Xia Yafeng, Austin Jersild) by using theories of International Relations (liberalism, realism and constructivism). The second part provides a historical description of the Sino-Soviet Split. Emphasis is placed on the Chinese side and especially regarding the role of Mao Zedong. This thesis focuses on the period between 1958 and 1964, nevertheless it is neccessary to include preceding and subsequent phases of the relations. It is essential due to cultural, ideological and national factors. These factors endured a long time and it would be impossible to...

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Sino-Soviet Split"

1

Mao's China and the Sino-Soviet split: Ideological dilemma. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2012.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Contending with contradictions: China's policy toward Soviet Eastern Europe and the origins of the Sino-Soviet split, 1953-1960. Lanham, Md: Lexington Books, 2001.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Luthi, Lorenz. Sino-soviet Split. princeton, 2008.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Li, Mingjiang. Mao's China and the Sino-Soviet Split: Ideological Dilemma. Taylor & Francis Group, 2014.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Luthi, Lorenz M. Sino-Soviet Split: Cold War in the Communist World. Princeton University Press, 2010.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Xia, Yafeng, and Danhui Li. Mao and the Sino-Soviet Split, 1959-1973: A New History. Lexington Books/Fortress Academic, 2020.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

The Sino-Soviet Split: Cold War in the Communist World (Princeton Studies in International History and Politics). Princeton University Press, 2008.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Luthi, Lorenz M. The Sino-Soviet Split: Cold War in the Communist World (Princeton Studies in International History and Politics). Princeton University Press, 2008.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Mitter, Rana. China and the Cold War. Edited by Richard H. Immerman and Petra Goedde. Oxford University Press, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199236961.013.0008.

Full text

Abstract:

This chapter examines the role of China in the Cold War. It describes the origins of Cold War in China and the participation of nationalist China in World War 2 and the Cold War, and suggests that China played a pivotal role as the third (albeit shorter) leg of a cold war tripod. The chapter contends that the Cold War era in China is inseparable from the political supremacy Mao Zedong, and highlights the impact of the split between China and the Soviet Union on the role of China in the Cold War. It also argues that the 1972 Sino-United States rapprochement contributed to the fading of China from the Cold War narrative.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Sino-Soviet Split"

1

Swift, John. "The Sino-Soviet Split." In The Palgrave Concise Historical Atlas of the Cold War, 54–55. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230001183_24.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Kochavi, Noam. "The Sino-Soviet Split." In A Companion to John F. Kennedy, 366–83. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118608760.ch19.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Keith, Ronald C. "‘Peaceful Coexistence’ and the Sino-Soviet Split." In The Diplomacy of Zhou Enlai, 88–116. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09890-3_5.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Braddick, C. W. "Independent thinking: Japanese civil society and the open Sino-Soviet split, 1962–64." In Japan and the Sino-Soviet Alliance, 1950–1964, 241–68. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230005693_9.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Sodhar, Muhammad Qasim. "The impact of the Sino-Soviet split on the politics of the left in Pakistan." In China and South Asia, 175–85. London: Routledge India, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780367855413-14.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

"Sino-Soviet Split." In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Imperialism and Anti-Imperialism, 2457. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29901-9_300886.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Whiting, Allen S. "The Sino-Soviet split." In The Cambridge History of China, 478–538. Cambridge University Press, 1987. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/chol9780521243360.012.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Radchenko, Sergey. "The Sino-Soviet split." In The Cambridge History of the Cold War, 349–72. Cambridge University Press, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/chol9780521837200.018.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

"The Sino-Soviet Split." In Russia: From Proletarian Revolution to State-Capitalist Counter-Revolution, 378–97. BRILL, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004347618_017.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

"Introduction." In The Sino-Soviet Split, 1–18. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9781400837625.1.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!