To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Skeletal MyoD Protein MyoD Protein Myogenin Transcriptional Activation.
Journal articles on the topic 'Skeletal MyoD Protein MyoD Protein Myogenin Transcriptional Activation'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Skeletal MyoD Protein MyoD Protein Myogenin Transcriptional Activation.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
Parker, Maura H., Robert L. S. Perry, Mélanie C. Fauteux, Charlotte A. Berkes, and Michael A. Rudnicki. "MyoD Synergizes with the E-Protein HEBβ To Induce Myogenic Differentiation." Molecular and Cellular Biology 26, no. 15 (August 1, 2006): 5771–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mcb.02404-05.
Full textAbstract:
ABSTRACT The MyoD family of basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors function as heterodimers with members of the E-protein family to induce myogenic gene activation. The E-protein HEB is alternatively spliced to generate α and β isoforms. While the function of these molecules has been studied in other cell types, questions persist regarding the molecular functions of HEB proteins in skeletal muscle. Our data demonstrate that HEBα expression remains unchanged in both myoblasts and myotubes, whereas HEBβ is upregulated during the early phases of terminal differentiation. Upon induction of differentiation, a MyoD-HEBβ complex bound the E1 E-box of the myogenin promoter leading to transcriptional activation. Importantly, forced expression of HEBβ with MyoD synergistically lead to precocious myogenin expression in proliferating myoblasts. However, after differentiation, HEBα and HEBβ synergized with myogenin, but not MyoD, to activate the myogenin promoter. Specific knockdown of HEBβ by small interfering RNA in myoblasts blocked differentiation and inhibited induction of myogenin transcription. Therefore, HEBα and HEBβ play novel and central roles in orchestrating the regulation of myogenic factor activity through myogenic differentiation.
2
Li, L., R. Heller-Harrison, M. Czech, and E. N. Olson. "Cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase inhibits the activity of myogenic helix-loop-helix proteins." Molecular and Cellular Biology 12, no. 10 (October 1992): 4478–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mcb.12.10.4478.
Full textAbstract:
Differentiation of skeletal muscle cells is inhibited by the cyclic AMP (cAMP) signal transduction pathway. Here we report that the catalytic subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) can substitute for cAMP and suppress muscle-specific transcription by silencing the activity of the MyoD family of regulatory factors, which includes MyoD, myogenin, myf5, and MRF4. Repression by the PKA catalytic (C) subunit is directed at the consensus sequence CANNTG, the target for DNA binding and transcriptional activation by these myogenic regulators. Phosphopeptide mapping of myogenin in vitro and in vivo revealed two PKA phosphorylation sites, both within the basic region. However, repression of myogenin function by PKA does not require direct phosphorylation of these sites but instead involves an indirect mechanism with one or more intermediate steps. Regulation of the transcriptional activity of the MyoD family by modulation of the cAMP signaling pathway may account for the inhibitory effects of certain peptide growth factors on muscle-specific gene expression and may also determine the responsiveness of different cell types to myogenic conversion by these myogenic regulators.
3
Li, L., R. Heller-Harrison, M. Czech, and E. N. Olson. "Cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase inhibits the activity of myogenic helix-loop-helix proteins." Molecular and Cellular Biology 12, no. 10 (October 1992): 4478–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mcb.12.10.4478-4485.1992.
Full textAbstract:
Differentiation of skeletal muscle cells is inhibited by the cyclic AMP (cAMP) signal transduction pathway. Here we report that the catalytic subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) can substitute for cAMP and suppress muscle-specific transcription by silencing the activity of the MyoD family of regulatory factors, which includes MyoD, myogenin, myf5, and MRF4. Repression by the PKA catalytic (C) subunit is directed at the consensus sequence CANNTG, the target for DNA binding and transcriptional activation by these myogenic regulators. Phosphopeptide mapping of myogenin in vitro and in vivo revealed two PKA phosphorylation sites, both within the basic region. However, repression of myogenin function by PKA does not require direct phosphorylation of these sites but instead involves an indirect mechanism with one or more intermediate steps. Regulation of the transcriptional activity of the MyoD family by modulation of the cAMP signaling pathway may account for the inhibitory effects of certain peptide growth factors on muscle-specific gene expression and may also determine the responsiveness of different cell types to myogenic conversion by these myogenic regulators.
4
Wyzykowski, Jeffrey C., Therry I. Winata, Natalia Mitin, Elizabeth J. Taparowsky, and Stephen F. Konieczny. "Identification of Novel MyoD Gene Targets in Proliferating Myogenic Stem Cells." Molecular and Cellular Biology 22, no. 17 (September 1, 2002): 6199–208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mcb.22.17.6199-6208.2002.
Full textAbstract:
ABSTRACT A major control point for skeletal myogenesis revolves around the muscle basic helix-loop-helix gene family that includes MyoD, Myf-5, myogenin, and MRF4. Myogenin and MRF4 are thought to be essential to terminal differentiation events, whereas MyoD and Myf-5 are critical to establishing the myogenic cell lineage and producing committed, undifferentiated myogenic stem cells (myoblasts). Although mouse genetic studies have revealed the importance of MyoD and Myf-5 for myoblast development, the genetic targets of MyoD and Myf-5 activity in undifferentiated myoblasts remain unknown. In this study, we investigated the function of MyoD as a transcriptional activator in undifferentiated myoblasts. By using conditional expression of MyoD, in conjunction with suppression subtractive hybridizations, we show that the Id3 and NP1 (neuronal pentraxin 1) genes become transcriptionally active following MyoD induction in undifferentiated myoblasts. Activation of Id3 and NP1 represents a stable, heritable event that does not rely on continued MyoD activity and is not subject to negative regulation by an activated H-Ras G12V protein. These results are the first to demonstrate that MyoD functions as a transcriptional activator in myogenic stem cells and that this key myogenic regulatory factor exhibits different gene target specificities, depending upon the cellular environment.
5
Biesiada, Elzbieta, Yasuo Hamamori, Larry Kedes, and Vittorio Sartorelli. "Myogenic Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Proteins and Sp1 Interact as Components of a Multiprotein Transcriptional Complex Required for Activity of the Human Cardiac α-Actin Promoter." Molecular and Cellular Biology 19, no. 4 (April 1, 1999): 2577–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mcb.19.4.2577.
Full textAbstract:
ABSTRACT Activation of the human cardiac α-actin (HCA) promoter in skeletal muscle cells requires the integrity of DNA binding sites for the serum response factor (SRF), Sp1, and the myogenic basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) family. In this study we report that activation of the HCA correlates with formation of a muscle-specific multiprotein complex on the promoter. We provide evidence that proteins eluted from the multiprotein complex specifically react with antibodies directed against myogenin, Sp1, and SRF and that the complex can be assembled in vitro by using the HCA promoter and purified MyoD, E12, SRF, and Sp1. In vitro and in vivo assays revealed a direct association of Sp1 and myogenin-MyoD mediated by the DNA-binding domain of Sp1 and the HLH motif of myogenin. The results obtained in this study indicate that protein-protein interactions and the cooperative DNA binding of transcriptional activators are critical steps in the formation of a transcriptionally productive multiprotein complex on the HCA promoter and suggest that the same mechanisms might be utilized to regulate the transcription of muscle-specific and other genes.
6
Mak, K. L., R. Q. To, Y. Kong, and S. F. Konieczny. "The MRF4 activation domain is required to induce muscle-specific gene expression." Molecular and Cellular Biology 12, no. 10 (October 1992): 4334–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mcb.12.10.4334.
Full textAbstract:
MRF4 is a member of the basic helix-loop-helix muscle regulatory factor family that also includes MyoD, myogenin, and Myf-5. Overexpression of MRF4 or the other muscle regulatory factors in fibroblasts converts the cells to differentiated muscle fibers and transcriptionally activates expression of endogenous and cotransfected muscle genes. Although these factors induce a similar phenotype, they also exhibit some distinct biological activities. For example, MyoD trans activates alpha-actin and troponin I reporter genes to very high levels, whereas MRF4 efficiently activates only alpha-actin expression. Since these proteins have a common basic helix-loop-helix domain, it is likely that portions of the proteins outside of this region impart some specificity to the activity of each muscle regulatory factor. As an initial step in determining the mechanism by which MRF4 and MyoD activate gene transcription, the transcriptional activation domain of MRF4 has been characterized. Experiments utilizing chimeric proteins containing the yeast GAL4 DNA-binding domain and portions of the MRF4 protein indicate that the MRF4 activation domain is located within amino acids 10 to 30. This amino terminus is both necessary and sufficient to elicit a transcriptional response in transfected cells. The MRF4 activation domain and the related amino-terminal MyoD activation domain are capable of substituting for one another in converting fibroblasts to a myogenic phenotype and in activating expression of an alpha-actin reporter gene, although the MRF4 and MyoD activation domains on these chimeric proteins also dictate the specificity of transcriptional activation. The different primary amino acid sequences of these regions leave open the possibility that different coregulator proteins interact with the muscle regulatory factors to elicit their correct transcriptional activity during skeletal muscle development.
7
Mak, K. L., R. Q. To, Y. Kong, and S. F. Konieczny. "The MRF4 activation domain is required to induce muscle-specific gene expression." Molecular and Cellular Biology 12, no. 10 (October 1992): 4334–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mcb.12.10.4334-4346.1992.
Full textAbstract:
MRF4 is a member of the basic helix-loop-helix muscle regulatory factor family that also includes MyoD, myogenin, and Myf-5. Overexpression of MRF4 or the other muscle regulatory factors in fibroblasts converts the cells to differentiated muscle fibers and transcriptionally activates expression of endogenous and cotransfected muscle genes. Although these factors induce a similar phenotype, they also exhibit some distinct biological activities. For example, MyoD trans activates alpha-actin and troponin I reporter genes to very high levels, whereas MRF4 efficiently activates only alpha-actin expression. Since these proteins have a common basic helix-loop-helix domain, it is likely that portions of the proteins outside of this region impart some specificity to the activity of each muscle regulatory factor. As an initial step in determining the mechanism by which MRF4 and MyoD activate gene transcription, the transcriptional activation domain of MRF4 has been characterized. Experiments utilizing chimeric proteins containing the yeast GAL4 DNA-binding domain and portions of the MRF4 protein indicate that the MRF4 activation domain is located within amino acids 10 to 30. This amino terminus is both necessary and sufficient to elicit a transcriptional response in transfected cells. The MRF4 activation domain and the related amino-terminal MyoD activation domain are capable of substituting for one another in converting fibroblasts to a myogenic phenotype and in activating expression of an alpha-actin reporter gene, although the MRF4 and MyoD activation domains on these chimeric proteins also dictate the specificity of transcriptional activation. The different primary amino acid sequences of these regions leave open the possibility that different coregulator proteins interact with the muscle regulatory factors to elicit their correct transcriptional activity during skeletal muscle development.
8
Black, Brian L., Jeffery D. Molkentin, and Eric N. Olson. "Multiple Roles for the MyoD Basic Region in Transmission of Transcriptional Activation Signals and Interaction with MEF2." Molecular and Cellular Biology 18, no. 1 (January 1, 1998): 69–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mcb.18.1.69.
Full textAbstract:
ABSTRACT Establishment of skeletal muscle lineages is controlled by the MyoD family of basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors. The ability of these factors to initiate myogenesis is dependent on two conserved amino acid residues, alanine and threonine, in the basic domains of these factors. It has been postulated that these two residues may be responsible for the initiation of myogenesis via interaction with an essential myogenic cofactor. The myogenic bHLH proteins cooperatively activate transcription and myogenesis through protein-protein interactions with members of the myocyte enhancer factor 2 (MEF2) family of MADS domain transcription factors. MyoD-E12 heterodimers interact with MEF2 proteins to synergistically activate myogenesis, while homodimers of E12, which lack the conserved alanine and threonine residues in the basic domain, do not interact with MEF2. We have examined whether the myogenic alanine and threonine in the MyoD basic region are required for interaction with MEF2. Here, we show that substitution of the MyoD basic domain with that of E12 does not prevent interaction with MEF2. Instead, the inability of alanine-threonine mutants of MyoD to initiate myogenesis is due to a failure to transmit transcriptional activation signals provided either from the MyoD or the MEF2 activation domain. This defect in transcriptional transmission can be overcome by substitution of the MyoD or the MEF2 activation domain with the VP16 activation domain. These results demonstrate that myogenic bHLH-MEF2 interaction can be uncoupled from transcriptional activation and support the idea that the myogenic residues in myogenic bHLH proteins are essential for transmission of a transcriptional activation signal.
9
Dacwag, Caroline S., Yasuyuki Ohkawa, Sharmistha Pal, Saïd Sif, and Anthony N. Imbalzano. "The Protein Arginine Methyltransferase Prmt5 Is Required for Myogenesis because It Facilitates ATP-Dependent Chromatin Remodeling." Molecular and Cellular Biology 27, no. 1 (October 16, 2006): 384–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mcb.01528-06.
Full textAbstract:
ABSTRACT Skeletal muscle differentiation requires the coordinated activity of transcription factors, histone modifying enzymes, and ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling enzymes. The type II protein arginine methyltransferase Prmt5 symmetrically dimethylates histones H3 and H4 and numerous nonchromatin proteins, and prior work has implicated Prmt5 in transcriptional repression. Here we demonstrate that MyoD-induced muscle differentiation requires Prmt5. One of the first genes activated during differentiation encodes the myogenic regulator myogenin. Prmt5 and dimethylated H3R8 (histone 3 arginine 8) are localized at the myogenin promoter in differentiating cells. Modification of H3R8 required Prmt5, and reduction of Prmt5 resulted in the abrogation of promoter binding by the Brg1 ATPase-associated with the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling enzymes and all subsequent events associated with gene activation, including increases in chromatin accessibility and stable binding by MyoD. Prmt5 and dimethylated H3R8 were also associated with the myogenin promoter in activated satellite cells isolated from muscle tissue, further demonstrating the physiological relevance of these observations. The data indicate that Prmt5 facilitates myogenesis because it is required for Brg1-dependent chromatin remodeling and gene activation at a locus essential for differentiation. We therefore conclude that a histone modifying enzyme is necessary to permit an ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling enzyme to function.
10
Kong, Y., M. J. Flick, A. J. Kudla, and S. F. Konieczny. "Muscle LIM protein promotes myogenesis by enhancing the activity of MyoD." Molecular and Cellular Biology 17, no. 8 (August 1997): 4750–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mcb.17.8.4750.
Full textAbstract:
The muscle LIM protein (MLP) is a muscle-specific LIM-only factor that exhibits a dual subcellular localization, being present in both the nucleus and in the cytoplasm. Overexpression of MLP in C2C12 myoblasts enhances skeletal myogenesis, whereas inhibition of MLP activity blocks terminal differentiation. Thus, MLP functions as a positive developmental regulator, although the mechanism through which MLP promotes terminal differentiation events remains unknown. While examining the distinct roles associated with the nuclear and cytoplasmic forms of MLP, we found that nuclear MLP functions through a physical interaction with the muscle basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors MyoD, MRF4, and myogenin. This interaction is highly specific since MLP does not associate with nonmuscle bHLH proteins E12 or E47 or with the myocyte enhancer factor-2 (MEF2) protein, which acts cooperatively with the myogenic bHLH proteins to promote myogenesis. The first LIM motif in MLP and the highly conserved bHLH region of MyoD are responsible for mediating the association between these muscle-specific factors. MLP also interacts with MyoD-E47 heterodimers, leading to an increase in the DNA-binding activity associated with this active bHLH complex. Although MLP lacks a functional transcription activation domain, we propose that it serves as a cofactor for the myogenic bHLH proteins by increasing their interaction with specific DNA regulatory elements. Thus, the functional complex of MLP-MyoD-E protein reveals a novel mechanism for both initiating and maintaining the myogenic program and suggests a global strategy for how LIM-only proteins may control a variety of developmental pathways.
11
Sandmöller, A., H. Meents, and H. H. Arnold. "A novel E1A domain mediates skeletal-muscle-specific enhancer repression independently of pRB and p300 binding." Molecular and Cellular Biology 16, no. 10 (October 1996): 5846–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mcb.16.10.5846.
Full textAbstract:
The adenovirus E1A oncoprotein completely blocks muscle differentiation and specifically inhibits the transactivating function of myogenic basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors. This inhibition is dependent on the conserved region CR1 of E1A, which also constitutes part of the binding sites for the pocket proteins pRB, p107, and p130 and the transcriptional coactivators p300 and CBP. Here we report a detailed mutational analysis of E1A and the identification of a muscle inhibition motif within CR1. This motif encompasses amino acids 38 to 62 and inhibits Myf-5- or MyoD-mediated activation of myogenin and the muscle creatine kinase gene. Overexpression of this E1A region also inhibits the conversion of 10T1/2 fibroblasts to the myogenic lineage. The sequence motif EPDNEE (amino acids 55 to 60) within CR1 appears to be particularly important, because point mutations of this sequence diminish the E1A inhibitory activity. Interactions of E1A with pRB and with p300 do not seem to be necessary for the muscle-specific enhancer repression, because E1A mutants which lack these interactions still inhibit Myf-5- and MyoD-mediated transactivation. Moreover, overexpression of p300 fails to overcome muscle-specific inhibition by wild-type E1A and mutant E1A protein which lacks pRB binding. Since we have no evidence for direct E1A interaction with bHLH proteins, we propose that E1A may target a necessary cofactor of the muscle-specific bHLH transcription complex.
12
Cserjesi, P., B. Lilly, L. Bryson, Y. Wang, D. A. Sassoon, and E. N. Olson. "MHox: a mesodermally restricted homeodomain protein that binds an essential site in the muscle creatine kinase enhancer." Development 115, no. 4 (August 1, 1992): 1087–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.115.4.1087.
Full textAbstract:
Myogenic helix-loop-helix (HLH) proteins, such as myogenin and MyoD, can activate muscle-specific transcription when introduced into a variety of nonmuscle cell types. Whereas cells of mesodermal origin are especially permissive to the actions of these myogenic regulators, many other cell types are refractory to myogenic conversion by them. Here we describe a novel homeodomain protein, MHox, that binds an A+T-rich element in the muscle creatine kinase (MCK) enhancer that is essential for muscle-specific transcription and trans-activation by myogenic HLH proteins. MHox is completely restricted to mesodermally derived cell types during embryogenesis and to established cell lines of mesodermal origin. In contrast to most other homeobox genes, MHox expression is excluded from the nervous system, with the highest levels observed in limb bud and visceral arches. In adult mice, MHox is expressed at high levels in skeletal muscle, heart and uterus. The DNA-binding properties and pattern of MHox expression are unique among homeobox genes and suggest a role for MHox as a transcriptional regulator that participates in the establishment of diverse mesodermal cell types.
13
Goldhamer, D. J., B. P. Brunk, A. Faerman, A. King, M. Shani, and C. P. Emerson. "Embryonic activation of the myoD gene is regulated by a highly conserved distal control element." Development 121, no. 3 (March 1, 1995): 637–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.121.3.637.
Full textAbstract:
MyoD belongs to a small family of basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors implicated in skeletal muscle lineage determination and differentiation. Previously, we identified a transcriptional enhancer that regulates the embryonic expression of the human myoD gene. This enhancer had been localized to a 4 kb fragment located 18 to 22 kb upstream of the myoD transcriptional start site. We now present a molecular characterization of this enhancer. Transgenic and transfection analyses localize the myoD enhancer to a core sequence of 258 bp. In transgenic mice, this enhancer directs expression of a lacZ reporter gene to skeletal muscle compartments in a spatiotemporal pattern indistinguishable from the normal myoD expression domain, and distinct from expression patterns reported for the other myogenic factors. In contrast to the myoD promoter, the myoD enhancer shows striking conservation between humans and mice both in its sequence and its distal position. Furthermore, a myoD enhancer/heterologous promoter construct exhibits muscle-specific expression in transgenic mice, demonstrating that the myoD promoter is dispensable for myoD activation. With the exception of E-boxes, the myoD enhancer has no apparent sequence similarity with regulatory regions of other characterized muscle-specific structural or regulatory genes. Mutation of these E-boxes, however, does not affect the pattern of lacZ transgene expression, suggesting that myoD activation in the embryo is E-box-independent. DNase I protection assays reveal multiple nuclear protein binding sites in the core enhancer, although none are strictly muscle-specific. Interestingly, extracts from myoblasts and 10T1/2 fibroblasts yield identical protection profiles, indicating a similar complement of enhancer-binding factors in muscle and this non-muscle cell type. However, a clear difference exists between myoblasts and 10T1/2 cells (and other non-muscle cell types) in the chromatin structure of the chromosomal myoD core enhancer, suggesting that the myoD enhancer is repressed by epigenetic mechanisms in 10T1/2 cells. These data indicate that myoD activation is regulated at multiple levels by mechanisms that are distinct from those controlling other characterized muscle-specific genes.
14
Xu, Qing, Lu Yu, Lanying Liu, Ching Fung Cheung, Xue Li, Siu-Pok Yee, Xiang-Jiao Yang, and Zhenguo Wu. "p38 Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase-, Calcium-Calmodulin–dependent Protein Kinase-, and Calcineurin-mediated Signaling Pathways Transcriptionally Regulate Myogenin Expression." Molecular Biology of the Cell 13, no. 6 (June 2002): 1940–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.02-02-0016.
Full textAbstract:
In this report, we identify myogenin as an important transcriptional target under the control of three intracellular signaling pathways, namely, the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase- (MAPK), calcium-calmodulin–dependent protein kinase- (CaMK), and calcineurin-mediated pathways, during skeletal muscle differentiation. Three cis-elements (i.e., the E box, myocyte enhancer factor [MEF] 2, and MEF3 sites) in the proximal myogenin promoter in response to these three pathways are defined. MyoD, MEF2s, and Six proteins, the trans-activators bound to these cis-elements, are shown to be activated by these signaling pathways. Our data support a model in which all three signaling pathways act in parallel but nonredundantly to control myogenin expression. Inhibition of any one pathway will result in abolished or reduced myogenin expression and subsequent phenotypic differentiation. In addition, we demonstrate that CaMK and calcineurin fail to activate MEF2s in Rhabdomyosarcoma-derived RD cells. For CaMK, we show its activation in response to differentiation signals and its effect on the cytoplasmic translocation of histone deacetylases 5 are not compromised in RD cells, suggesting histone deacetylases 5 cytoplasmic translocation is necessary but not sufficient, and additional signal is required in conjunction with CaMK to activate MEF2 proteins.
15
Nguyen, Mai Thi, Kyung-Ho Min, and Wan Lee. "MiR-96-5p Induced by Palmitic Acid Suppresses the Myogenic Differentiation of C2C12 Myoblasts by Targeting FHL1." International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 24 (December 11, 2020): 9445. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21249445.
Full textAbstract:
Skeletal myogenesis is a multi-stage process that includes the cell cycle exit, myogenic transcriptional activation, and morphological changes to form multinucleated myofibers. Recent studies have shown that saturated fatty acids (SFA) and miRNAs play crucial roles in myogenesis and muscle homeostasis. Nevertheless, the target molecules and myogenic regulatory mechanisms of miRNAs are largely unknown, particularly when myogenesis is dysregulated by SFA deposition. This study investigated the critical role played by miR-96-5p on the myogenic differentiation in C2C12 myoblasts. Long-chain SFA palmitic acid (PA) significantly reduced FHL1 expression and inhibited the myogenic differentiation of C2C12 myoblasts but induced miR-96-5p expression. The knockdown of FHL1 by siRNA stimulated cell proliferation and inhibited myogenic differentiation of myoblasts. Interestingly, miR-96-5p suppressed FHL1 expression by directly targeting the 3’UTR of FHL1 mRNA. The transfection of an miR-96-5p mimic upregulated the expressions of cell cycle-related genes, such as PCNA, CCNB1, and CCND1, and increased myoblast proliferation. Moreover, the miR-96-5p mimic inhibited the expressions of myogenic factors, such as myoblast determination protein (MyoD), myogenin (MyoG), myocyte enhancer factor 2C (MEF2C), and myosin heavy chain (MyHC), and dramatically impeded differentiation and fusion of myoblasts. Overall, this study highlights the role of miR-96-5p in myogenesis via FHL1 suppression and suggests a novel regulatory mechanism for myogenesis mediated by miRNA in a background of obesity.
16
Ramocki, M. B., S. E. Johnson, M. A. White, C. L. Ashendel, S. F. Konieczny, and E. J. Taparowsky. "Signaling through mitogen-activated protein kinase and Rac/Rho does not duplicate the effects of activated Ras on skeletal myogenesis." Molecular and Cellular Biology 17, no. 7 (July 1997): 3547–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mcb.17.7.3547.
Full textAbstract:
The ability of basic helix-loop-helix muscle regulatory factors (MRFs), such as MyoD, to convert nonmuscle cells to a myogenic lineage is regulated by numerous growth factor and oncoprotein signaling pathways. Previous studies have shown that H-Ras 12V inhibits differentiation to a skeletal muscle lineage by disrupting MRF function via a mechanism that is independent of the dimerization, DNA binding, and inherent transcriptional activation properties of the proteins. To investigate the intracellular signaling pathway(s) that mediates the inhibition of MRF-induced myogenesis by oncogenic Ras, we tested two transformation-defective H-Ras 12V effector domain variants for their ability to alter terminal differentiation. H-Ras 12V,35S retains the ability to activate the Raf/MEK/mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase cascade, whereas H-Ras 12V,40C is unable to interact directly with Raf-1 yet still influences other signaling intermediates, including Rac and Rho. Expression of each H-Ras 12V variant in C3H10T1/2 cells abrogates MyoD-induced activation of the complete myogenic program, suggesting that MAP kinase-dependent and -independent Ras signaling pathways individually block myogenesis in this model system. However, additional studies with constitutively activated Rac1 and RhoA proteins revealed no negative effects on MyoD-induced myogenesis. Similarly, treatment of Ras-inhibited myoblasts with the MEK1 inhibitor PD98059 revealed that elevated MAP kinase activity is not a significant contributor to the H-Ras 12V effect. These data suggest that an additional Ras pathway, distinct from the well-characterized MAP kinase and Rac/Rho pathways known to be important for the transforming function of activated Ras, is primarily responsible for the inhibition of myogenesis by H-Ras 12V.
17
Henderson, E., and R. Stein. "c-jun inhibits transcriptional activation by the insulin enhancer, and the insulin control element is the target of control." Molecular and Cellular Biology 14, no. 1 (January 1994): 655–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mcb.14.1.655.
Full textAbstract:
Selective transcription of the insulin gene in pancreatic beta cells is regulated by its enhancer, located between nucleotides -340 and -91 relative to the transcription start site. One of the principal control elements within the enhancer is found between nucleotides -100 and -91 (GCCATCTGCT, referred to as the insulin control element [ICE]) and is regulated by both positive- and negative-acting transcription factors in the helix-loop-helix (HLH) family. It was previously shown that the c-jun proto-oncogene can repress insulin gene transcription. We have found that c-jun inhibits ICE-stimulated transcription. Inhibition of ICE-directed transcription is mediated by sequences within the carboxy-terminal region of the protein. These c-jun sequences span an activation domain and the basic leucine zipper DNA binding-dimerization region of the protein. Both regions of c-jun are conserved within the other members of the jun family: junB and junD. These proteins also suppress ICE-mediated transcription. The jun proteins do not appear to inhibit insulin gene transcription by binding directly to the ICE. c-jun and junB also block the trans-activation potential of two skeletal muscle-specific HLH proteins, MyoD and myogenin. These results suggests that the jun proteins may be common transcription control factors used in skeletal muscle and pancreatic beta cells to regulate HLH-mediated activity. We discuss the possible significance of these observations to insulin gene transcription in pancreatic beta cells.
18
Henderson, E., and R. Stein. "c-jun inhibits transcriptional activation by the insulin enhancer, and the insulin control element is the target of control." Molecular and Cellular Biology 14, no. 1 (January 1994): 655–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mcb.14.1.655-662.1994.
Full textAbstract:
Selective transcription of the insulin gene in pancreatic beta cells is regulated by its enhancer, located between nucleotides -340 and -91 relative to the transcription start site. One of the principal control elements within the enhancer is found between nucleotides -100 and -91 (GCCATCTGCT, referred to as the insulin control element [ICE]) and is regulated by both positive- and negative-acting transcription factors in the helix-loop-helix (HLH) family. It was previously shown that the c-jun proto-oncogene can repress insulin gene transcription. We have found that c-jun inhibits ICE-stimulated transcription. Inhibition of ICE-directed transcription is mediated by sequences within the carboxy-terminal region of the protein. These c-jun sequences span an activation domain and the basic leucine zipper DNA binding-dimerization region of the protein. Both regions of c-jun are conserved within the other members of the jun family: junB and junD. These proteins also suppress ICE-mediated transcription. The jun proteins do not appear to inhibit insulin gene transcription by binding directly to the ICE. c-jun and junB also block the trans-activation potential of two skeletal muscle-specific HLH proteins, MyoD and myogenin. These results suggests that the jun proteins may be common transcription control factors used in skeletal muscle and pancreatic beta cells to regulate HLH-mediated activity. We discuss the possible significance of these observations to insulin gene transcription in pancreatic beta cells.
19
Wang, Yujie, Jideng Ma, Wanling Qiu, Jinwei Zhang, Siyuan Feng, Xiankun Zhou, Xun Wang, et al. "Guanidinoacetic Acid Regulates Myogenic Differentiation and Muscle Growth Through miR-133a-3p and miR-1a-3p Co-mediated Akt/mTOR/S6K Signaling Pathway." International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19, no. 9 (September 19, 2018): 2837. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19092837.
Full textAbstract:
Guanidinoacetic acid (GAA), an amino acid derivative that is endogenous to animal tissues including muscle and nerve, has been reported to enhance muscular performance. MicroRNA (miRNA) is a post-transcriptional regulator that plays a key role in nutrient-mediated myogenesis. However, the effects of GAA on myogenic differentiation and skeletal muscle growth, and the potential regulatory mechanisms of miRNA in these processes have not been elucidated. In this study, we investigated the effects of GAA on proliferation, differentiation, and growth in C2C12 cells and mice. The results showed that GAA markedly inhibited the proliferation of myoblasts, along with the down-regulation of cyclin D1 (CCND1) and cyclin dependent kinase 4 (CDK4) mRNA expression, and the upregulation of cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 1A (P21) mRNA expression. We also demonstrated that GAA treatment stimulated myogenic differentiation 1 (MyoD) and myogenin (MyoG) mRNA expression, resulting in an increase in the myotube fusion rate. Meanwhile, GAA supplementation promoted myotube growth through increase in total myosin heavy chain (MyHC) protein level, myotubes thickness and gastrocnemius muscle cross-sectional area. Furthermore, small RNA sequencing revealed that a total of eight miRNAs, including miR-133a-3p and miR-1a-3p cluster, showed differential expression after GAA supplementation. To further study the function of miR-133a-3p and miR-1a-3p in GAA-induced skeletal muscle growth, we transfected miR-133a-3p and miR-1a-3p mimics into myotube, which also induced muscle growth. Through bioinformatics and a dual-luciferase reporter system, the target genes of miR-133a-3p and miR-1a-3p were determined. These two miRNAs were shown to modulate the Akt/mTOR/S6K signaling pathway by restraining target gene expression. Taken together, these findings suggest that GAA supplementation can promote myoblast differentiation and skeletal muscle growth through miR-133a-3p- and miR-1a-3p-induced activation of the AKT/mTOR/S6K signaling pathway.
20
Cooper, Lisa M., Rita C. West, Caleb S. Hayes, and David S. Waddell. "Dual-specificity phosphatase 29 is induced during neurogenic skeletal muscle atrophy and attenuates glucocorticoid receptor activity in muscle cell culture." American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology 319, no. 2 (August 1, 2020): C441—C454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00200.2020.
Full textAbstract:
Skeletal muscle atrophy is caused by a decrease in muscle size and strength and results from a range of physiological conditions, including denervation, immobilization, corticosteroid exposure and aging. Newly named dual-specificity phosphatase 29 ( Dusp29) has been identified as a novel neurogenic atrophy-induced gene in skeletal muscle. Quantitative PCR analysis revealed that Dusp29 expression is significantly higher in differentiated myotubes compared with proliferating myoblasts. To determine how Dusp29 is transcriptionally regulated in skeletal muscle, fragments of the promoter region of Dusp29 were cloned, fused to a reporter gene, and found to be highly inducible in response to ectopic expression of the myogenic regulatory factors (MRF), MyoD and myogenin. Furthermore, site-directed mutagenesis of conserved E-box elements within the proximal promoter of Dusp29 rendered a Dusp29 reporter gene unresponsive to MRF overexpression. Dusp29, an atypical Dusp also known as Dupd1/Dusp27, was found to attenuate the ERK1/2 branch of the MAP kinase signaling pathway in muscle cells and inhibit muscle cell differentiation when ectopically expressed in proliferating myoblasts. Interestingly, Dusp29 was also found to destabilize AMPK protein while simultaneously enriching the phosphorylated pool of AMPK in muscle cells. Additionally, Dusp29 overexpression resulted in a significant increase in the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) protein and elevation in GR phosphorylation. Finally, Dusp29 was found to significantly impair the ability of the glucocorticoid receptor to function as a transcriptional activator in muscle cells treated with dexamethasone. Identifying and characterizing the function of Dusp29 in muscle provides novel insights into the molecular and cellular mechanisms for skeletal muscle atrophy.
21
Oh, Sarah Se-Jung, Sujin Kim, Sohee Moon, Dong-Ho Park, and Ju-Hee Kang. "Lactate overload inhibits myogenic activity in C2C12 myotubes." Open Life Sciences 14, no. 1 (March 20, 2019): 29–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/biol-2019-0004.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractLactate (LA), an endogenous metabolite produced from pyruvate, can accumulate in skeletal muscle in certain conditions including major diseases, as well as during intensive exercise. Using differentiated C2C12 myotubes, we evaluated the early (1-h) and delayed (24-h) effects of LA (8 mM) on mechanisms involved in myogenesis or muscle atrophy, including 5'-adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK)-mediated inhibition of protein synthesis through the mTOR/P70-S6K pathway, Akt-mediated inhibition of expression of the MAFbx atrophic factor by FOXO3a and expression of the myogenic transcription factors, MyoD, myogenin and myosin heavy chain. Although the early effects of LA overload were not significant on myogenic or atrophic mechanisms, LA treatment for 24 h significantly activated atrophic mechanisms but suppressed myogenesis in myotubes. In addition, LA overload for 24 h significantly suppressed the expression of Sirtuin 1 and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator-1 alpha. Consistent with LA-induced activation of atrophic mechanisms, the diameter of C2C12 myotubes treated with LA for 24 h, but not for 1 h, was significantly lower than in control myotubes. Thus, a sustained, but not a transient, LA overload could induce muscle atrophy through the regulation of AMPK- and Akt-mediated pathways, although further in vivo studies are needed to confirm this.
22
Drummond, Micah J., Mitsunori Miyazaki, Hans C. Dreyer, Bart Pennings, Shaheen Dhanani, Elena Volpi, Karyn A. Esser, and Blake B. Rasmussen. "Expression of growth-related genes in young and older human skeletal muscle following an acute stimulation of protein synthesis." Journal of Applied Physiology 106, no. 4 (April 2009): 1403–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.90842.2008.
Full textAbstract:
Muscle growth is associated with an activation of the mTOR signaling pathway and satellite cell regulators. The purpose of this study was to determine whether 17 selected genes associated with mTOR/muscle protein synthesis and the satellite cells/myogenic program are differentially expressed in young and older human skeletal muscle at rest and in response to a potent anabolic stimulus [resistance exercise + essential amino acid ingestion (RE+EAA)]. Twelve male subjects (6 young, 6 old) completed a bout of heavy resistance exercise. Muscle biopsies were obtained before and at 3 and 6 h post RE+EAA. Subjects ingested leucine-enriched essential amino acids at 1 h postexercise. mRNA expression was determined using qRT-PCR. At rest, hVps34 mRNA was elevated in the older subjects ( P < 0.05) while there was a tendency for levels of myoD, myogenin, and TSC2 mRNA to be higher than young. The anabolic stimulus (RE+EAA) altered mRNAs associated with mTOR regulation. Notably, REDD2 decreased in both age groups ( P < 0.05) but the expression of Rheb mRNA increased only in the young. Finally, cMyc mRNA was elevated ( P < 0.05) in both young and old at 6 h post RE+EAA. Furthermore, RE+EAA also increased expression of several mRNAs associated with satellite function in the young ( P < 0.05), while expression of these mRNAs did not change in the old. We conclude that several anabolic genes in muscle are more responsive in young men post RE+EAA. Our data provide new insights into the regulation of genes important for transcription and translation in young and old human skeletal muscle post RE+EAA.
23
Cenciarelli, Carlo, Francesca De Santa, Pier Lorenzo Puri, Elisabetta Mattei, Letizia Ricci, Federica Bucci, Armando Felsani, and Maurizia Caruso. "Critical Role Played by Cyclin D3 in the MyoD-Mediated Arrest of Cell Cycle during Myoblast Differentiation." Molecular and Cellular Biology 19, no. 7 (July 1, 1999): 5203–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mcb.19.7.5203.
Full textAbstract:
ABSTRACT During the terminal differentiation of skeletal myoblasts, the activities of myogenic factors regulate not only tissue-specific gene expressions but also the exit from the cell cycle. The induction of cell cycle inhibitors such as p21 and pRb has been shown to play a prominent role in the growth arrest of differentiating myoblasts. Here we report that, at the onset of differentiation, activation by MyoD of the Rb, p21, and cyclin D3 genes occurs in the absence of new protein synthesis and with the requirement of the p300 transcriptional coactivator. In differentiated myocytes, cyclin D3 also becomes stabilized and is found nearly totally complexed with unphosphorylated pRb. The detection of complexes containing cyclin D3, cdk4, p21, and PCNA suggests that cdk4, along with PCNA, may get sequestered into high-order structures held together by pRb and cyclin D3. Cyclin D3 up-regulation and stabilization is inhibited by adenovirus E1A, and this correlates with the ability of E1A to promote pRb phosphorylation; conversely, the overexpression of cyclin D3 in differentiated myotubes counteracts the E1A-mediated reactivation of DNA synthesis. These results indicate that cyclin D3 critically contributes to the irreversible exit of differentiating myoblasts from the cell cycle.
24
Al-Shanti, Nasser, and Claire E. Stewart. "PD98059 enhances C2 myoblast differentiation through p38 MAPK activation: a novel role for PD98059." Journal of Endocrinology 198, no. 1 (May 8, 2008): 243–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1677/joe-08-0151.
Full textAbstract:
Cell differentiation is usually accompanied by irreversible cell cycle exit, which is a critical step for skeletal muscle differentiation. We therefore hypothesise that PD98059 that blocks the MAP kinase kinase (MEK) pathway (proliferation pathway) when administrated to murine C2 skeletal myoblasts will arrest cell cycle and, consequently, enhances differentiation relative to untreated controls. In this study, we aimed to examine this hypothesis using phenotypic differentiation, biochemical assays, flow cytometry and real-time PCR in C2 cells cultured for 48 h in differentiation media only (untreated) or supplemented with either a single dose of 10 ng/ml IGF-I or 20 μM PD98059 for 48 h. Creatine kinase (CK) activity was increased by 7.5-fold (P<0.05) in the presence of PD98059, whereas untreated and IGF-I-treated cells induced 4.5- and 4-fold increase respectively when compared with baseline controls. Increased CK values in the presence of PD98059 were not only associated with myotube formation but also associated with cell cycle arrest in G1 phase (86±3.2%; P<0.05). Moreover, the expression of myogenic-specific transcriptional factor mRNAs (MyoD and myogenin) was significantly higher in PD-treated cells (4.7±0.15 and 314±10.2 ng/reaction respectively; P<0.05) than untreated (2.0±0.2 and 233±11 ng/reaction respectively) or IGF-treated cells (3.2±0.24 and 296±16.2 ng/reaction respectively). Unexpectedly, Id3 mRNA, the potent negative regulator of muscle differentiation, was also expressed at significantly higher levels in PD-treated cells (77±0.346 ng/reaction; P<0.05) than untreated (49±7.7 ng/reaction) or IGF-I-treated cells (47±0.7 ng/reaction). Furthermore, expression of the muscle differentiation-specific genes (IGF-binding protein-5, IGF-II receptor and IGF-II) was also increased significantly in PD-treated cells when compared with untreated cells. Phosflow analysis showed a significant increase in the levels of phosphorylation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (49.0±6.7%, P<0.05) in PD-treated cells when compared with DM-treated cells (31.7±5.7%). These findings uncover a previously unconsidered positive effect of PD98059 on C2 myoblast differentiation and identify the pathway(s) underlying PD-induced C2 myoblast differentiation.
25
Bergstrom, Donald A., and Stephen J. Tapscott. "Molecular Distinction between Specification and Differentiation in the Myogenic Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factor Family." Molecular and Cellular Biology 21, no. 7 (April 1, 2001): 2404–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mcb.21.7.2404-2412.2001.
Full textAbstract:
ABSTRACT The myogenic basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) proteins regulate both skeletal muscle specification and differentiation: MyoD and Myf5 establish the muscle lineage, whereas myogenin mediates differentiation. Previously, we demonstrated that MyoD was more efficient than myogenin at initiating the expression of skeletal muscle genes, and in this study we present the molecular basis for this difference. A conserved amphipathic alpha-helix in the carboxy terminus of the myogenic bHLH proteins has distinct activities in MyoD and myogenin: the MyoD helix facilitates the initiation of endogenous gene expression, whereas the myogenin helix functions as a general transcriptional activation domain. Thus, the alternate use of a similar motif for gene initiation and activation provides a molecular basis for the distinction between specification and differentiation within the myogenic bHLH gene family.
26
Zhou, Hongyi, Huabo Su, and Weiqin Chen. "Neddylation Regulates Class IIa and III Histone Deacetylases to Mediate Myoblast Differentiation." International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 17 (September 1, 2021): 9509. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22179509.
Full textAbstract:
As the largest tissue in the body, skeletal muscle has multiple functions in movement and energy metabolism. Skeletal myogenesis is controlled by a transcriptional cascade including a set of muscle regulatory factors (MRFs) that includes Myogenic Differentiation 1 (MYOD1), Myocyte Enhancer Factor 2 (MEF2), and Myogenin (MYOG), which direct the fusion of myogenic myoblasts into multinucleated myotubes. Neddylation is a posttranslational modification that covalently conjugates ubiquitin-like NEDD8 (neural precursor cell expressed, developmentally downregulated 8) to protein targets. Inhibition of neddylation impairs muscle differentiation; however, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain less explored. Here, we report that neddylation is temporally regulated during myoblast differentiation. Inhibition of neddylation through pharmacological blockade using MLN4924 (Pevonedistat) or genetic deletion of NEDD8 Activating Enzyme E1 Subunit 1 (NAE1), a subunit of the E1 neddylation-activating enzyme, blocks terminal myoblast differentiation partially through repressing MYOG expression. Mechanistically, we found that neddylation deficiency enhances the mRNA and protein expressions of class IIa histone deacetylases 4 and 5 (HDAC4 and 5) and prevents the downregulation and nuclear export of class III HDAC (NAD-Dependent Protein Deacetylase Sirtuin-1, SIRT1), all of which have been shown to repress MYOD1-mediated MYOG transcriptional activation. Together, our findings for the first time identify the crucial role of neddylation in mediating class IIa and III HDAC co-repressors to control myogenic program and provide new insights into the mechanisms of muscle disease and regeneration.
27
Hughes, S. M., J. M. Taylor, S. J. Tapscott, C. M. Gurley, W. J. Carter, and C. A. Peterson. "Selective accumulation of MyoD and myogenin mRNAs in fast and slow adult skeletal muscle is controlled by innervation and hormones." Development 118, no. 4 (August 1, 1993): 1137–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.118.4.1137.
Full textAbstract:
Each of the myogenic helix-loop-helix transcription factors (MyoD, Myogenin, Myf-5, and MRF4) is capable of activating muscle-specific gene expression, yet distinct functions have not been ascribed to the individual proteins. We report here that MyoD and Myogenin mRNAs selectively accumulate in hindlimb muscles of the adult rat that differ in contractile properties: MyoD is prevalent in fast twitch and Myogenin in slow twitch muscles. The distribution of MyoD and Myogenin transcripts also differ within a single muscle and correlate with the proportions of fast glycolytic and slow oxidative muscle fibres, respectively. Furthermore, the expression of a transgene consisting of a muscle-specific cis-regulatory region from the myoD gene controlling lacZ was primarily associated with the fast glycolytic fibres. Alteration of the fast/slow fibre type distribution by thyroid hormone treatment or by cross-reinnervation resulted in a corresponding alteration in the MyoD/Myogenin mRNA expression pattern. These findings show that the expression of specific myogenic helix-loop-helix regulators is under the control of innervation and humoral factors and may mediate differential control of contractile protein gene expression in adult muscle.
28
Yutzey, K. E., S. J. Rhodes, and S. F. Konieczny. "Differential trans activation associated with the muscle regulatory factors MyoD1, myogenin, and MRF4." Molecular and Cellular Biology 10, no. 8 (August 1990): 3934–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mcb.10.8.3934.
Full textAbstract:
Expression of the mammalian muscle regulatory factors MyoD1, myogenin, and MRF4 will convert C3H10T1/2 fibroblasts to stable muscle cell lineages. Recent studies have shown that MyoD1 and myogenin also trans-activate expression of a number of cotransfected contractile protein genes, suggesting that these muscle regulatory factors are involved in controlling terminal differentiation events. The extent and specificity of trans activation by the muscle regulatory factors, however, have not been compared directly. In this study, we found that MyoD1, myogenin, and MRF4 exhibited different trans-activation capacities. In contrast to MyoD1 and myogenin, MRF4 was inefficient in trans-activating most of the genes tested, although conversion of C3H10T1/2 fibroblasts to a myogenic lineage was observed at similar frequencies with all three factors. Addition of basic fibroblast growth factor to cells expressing exogenous muscle regulatory factors inhibited the transcriptional activation of cotransfected genes, demonstrating that MyoD1, myogenin, or MRF4 proteins alone are not sufficient to produce a terminally differentiated phenotype. In all cases, trans activation was dependent on signal transduction pathways that are regulated by fibroblast growth factor. Our observations, coupled with previous studies showing differences in the temporal expression and protein structure of MyoD1, myogenin, and MRF4, suggest that the individual members of the muscle regulatory factor family have distinct biological roles in controlling skeletal muscle development.
29
Yutzey, K. E., S. J. Rhodes, and S. F. Konieczny. "Differential trans activation associated with the muscle regulatory factors MyoD1, myogenin, and MRF4." Molecular and Cellular Biology 10, no. 8 (August 1990): 3934–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mcb.10.8.3934-3944.1990.
Full textAbstract:
Expression of the mammalian muscle regulatory factors MyoD1, myogenin, and MRF4 will convert C3H10T1/2 fibroblasts to stable muscle cell lineages. Recent studies have shown that MyoD1 and myogenin also trans-activate expression of a number of cotransfected contractile protein genes, suggesting that these muscle regulatory factors are involved in controlling terminal differentiation events. The extent and specificity of trans activation by the muscle regulatory factors, however, have not been compared directly. In this study, we found that MyoD1, myogenin, and MRF4 exhibited different trans-activation capacities. In contrast to MyoD1 and myogenin, MRF4 was inefficient in trans-activating most of the genes tested, although conversion of C3H10T1/2 fibroblasts to a myogenic lineage was observed at similar frequencies with all three factors. Addition of basic fibroblast growth factor to cells expressing exogenous muscle regulatory factors inhibited the transcriptional activation of cotransfected genes, demonstrating that MyoD1, myogenin, or MRF4 proteins alone are not sufficient to produce a terminally differentiated phenotype. In all cases, trans activation was dependent on signal transduction pathways that are regulated by fibroblast growth factor. Our observations, coupled with previous studies showing differences in the temporal expression and protein structure of MyoD1, myogenin, and MRF4, suggest that the individual members of the muscle regulatory factor family have distinct biological roles in controlling skeletal muscle development.
30
Daubas, P., S. Tajbakhsh, J. Hadchouel, M. Primig, and M. Buckingham. "Myf5 is a novel early axonal marker in the mouse brain and is subjected to post-transcriptional regulation in neurons." Development 127, no. 2 (January 15, 2000): 319–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.127.2.319.
Full textAbstract:
Myf5 is a key basic Helix-Loop-Helix transcription factor capable of converting many non-muscle cells into muscle. Together with MyoD it is essential for initiating the skeletal muscle programme in the embryo. We previously identified unexpected restricted domains of Myf5 transcription in the embryonic mouse brain, first revealed by Myf5-nlacZ(+/)(−) embryos (Tajbakhsh, S. and Buckingham, M. (1995) Development 121, 4077–4083). We have now further characterized these Myf5 expressing neurons. Retrograde labeling with diI, and the use of a transgenic mouse line expressing lacZ under the control of Myf5 regulatory sequences, show that Myf5 transcription provides a novel axonal marker of the medial longitudinal fasciculus (mlf) and the mammillotegmental tract (mtt), the earliest longitudinal tracts to be established in the embryonic mouse brain. Tracts projecting caudally from the developing olfactory system are also labelled. nlacZ and lacZ expression persist in the adult brain, in a few ventral domains such as the mammillary bodies of the hypothalamus and the interpeduncular nucleus, potentially derived from the embryonic structures where the Myf5 gene is transcribed. To investigate the role of Myf5 in the brain, we monitored Myf5 protein accumulation by immunofluorescence and immunoblotting in neurons transcribing the gene. Although Myf5 was detected in muscle myotomal cells, it was absent in neurons. This would account for the lack of myogenic conversion in brain structures and the absence of a neural phenotype in homozygous null mutants. RT-PCR experiments show that the splicing of Myf5 primary transcripts occurs correctly in neurons, suggesting that the lack of Myf5 protein accumulation is due to regulation at the level of mRNA translation or protein stability. In the embryonic neuroepithelium, Myf5 is transcribed in differentiated neurons after the expression of neural basic Helix-Loop-Helix transcription factors. The signalling molecules Wnt1 and Sonic hedgehog, implicated in the activation of Myf5 in myogenic progenitor cells in the somite, are also produced in the viscinity of the Myf5 expression domain in the mesencephalon. We show that cells expressing Wnt1 can activate neuronal Myf5-nlacZ gene expression in dissected head explants isolated from E9.5 embryos. Furthermore, the gene encoding the basic Helix-Loop-Helix transcription factor mSim1 is expressed in adjacent cells in both the somite and the brain, suggesting that signalling molecules necessary for the activation of mSim1 as well as Myf5 are present at these different sites in the embryo. This phenomenon may be widespread and it remains to be seen how many other potentially potent regulatory genes, in addition to Myf5, when activated do not accumulate protein at inappropriate sites in the embryo.
31
Dechesne, C. A., Q. Wei, J. Eldridge, L. Gannoun-Zaki, P. Millasseau, L. Bougueleret, D. Caterina, and B. M. Paterson. "E-box- and MEF-2-independent muscle-specific expression, positive autoregulation, and cross-activation of the chicken MyoD (CMD1) promoter reveal an indirect regulatory pathway." Molecular and Cellular Biology 14, no. 8 (August 1994): 5474–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mcb.14.8.5474.
Full textAbstract:
Members of the MyoD family of gene-regulatory proteins (MyoD, myogenin, myf5, and MRF4) have all been shown not only to regulate the transcription of numerous muscle-specific genes but also to positively autoregulate and cross activate each other's transcription. In the case of muscle-specific genes, this transcriptional regulation can often be correlated with the presence of a DNA consensus in the regulatory region CANNTG, known as an E box. Little is known about the regulatory interactions of the myogenic factors themselves; however, these interactions are thought to be important for the activation and maintenance of the muscle phenotype. We have identified the minimal region in the chicken MyoD (CMD1) promoter necessary for muscle-specific transcription in primary cultures of embryonic chicken skeletal muscle. The CMD1 promoter is silent in primary chick fibroblast cultures and in muscle cell cultures treated with the thymidine analog bromodeoxyuridine. However, CMD1 and chicken myogenin, as well as, to a lesser degree, chicken Myf5 and MRF4, expressed in trans can activate transcription from the minimal CMD1 promoter in these primary fibroblast cultures. Here we show that the CMD1 promoter contains numerous E-box binding sites for CMD1 and the other myogenic factors, as well as a MEF-2 binding site. Surprisingly, neither muscle-specific and the other myogenic factors, as well as a MEF-2 binding site. Surprisingly, neither muscle-specific expression, autoregulation, or cross activation depends upon the presence of of these E-box or MEF-2 binding sites in the CMD1 promoter. These results demonstrate that the autoregulation and cross activation of the chicken MyoD promoter through the putative direct binding of the myogenic basic helix-loop-helix regulatory factors is mediated through an indirect pathway that involves unidentified regulatory elements and/or ancillary factors.
32
Dechesne, C. A., Q. Wei, J. Eldridge, L. Gannoun-Zaki, P. Millasseau, L. Bougueleret, D. Caterina, and B. M. Paterson. "E-box- and MEF-2-independent muscle-specific expression, positive autoregulation, and cross-activation of the chicken MyoD (CMD1) promoter reveal an indirect regulatory pathway." Molecular and Cellular Biology 14, no. 8 (August 1994): 5474–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mcb.14.8.5474-5486.1994.
Full textAbstract:
Members of the MyoD family of gene-regulatory proteins (MyoD, myogenin, myf5, and MRF4) have all been shown not only to regulate the transcription of numerous muscle-specific genes but also to positively autoregulate and cross activate each other's transcription. In the case of muscle-specific genes, this transcriptional regulation can often be correlated with the presence of a DNA consensus in the regulatory region CANNTG, known as an E box. Little is known about the regulatory interactions of the myogenic factors themselves; however, these interactions are thought to be important for the activation and maintenance of the muscle phenotype. We have identified the minimal region in the chicken MyoD (CMD1) promoter necessary for muscle-specific transcription in primary cultures of embryonic chicken skeletal muscle. The CMD1 promoter is silent in primary chick fibroblast cultures and in muscle cell cultures treated with the thymidine analog bromodeoxyuridine. However, CMD1 and chicken myogenin, as well as, to a lesser degree, chicken Myf5 and MRF4, expressed in trans can activate transcription from the minimal CMD1 promoter in these primary fibroblast cultures. Here we show that the CMD1 promoter contains numerous E-box binding sites for CMD1 and the other myogenic factors, as well as a MEF-2 binding site. Surprisingly, neither muscle-specific and the other myogenic factors, as well as a MEF-2 binding site. Surprisingly, neither muscle-specific expression, autoregulation, or cross activation depends upon the presence of of these E-box or MEF-2 binding sites in the CMD1 promoter. These results demonstrate that the autoregulation and cross activation of the chicken MyoD promoter through the putative direct binding of the myogenic basic helix-loop-helix regulatory factors is mediated through an indirect pathway that involves unidentified regulatory elements and/or ancillary factors.
33
Johnston, L. A., S. J. Tapscott, and H. Eisen. "Sodium butyrate inhibits myogenesis by interfering with the transcriptional activation function of MyoD and myogenin." Molecular and Cellular Biology 12, no. 11 (November 1992): 5123–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mcb.12.11.5123.
Full textAbstract:
Sodium butyrate reversibly inhibits muscle differentiation and blocks the expression of many muscle-specific genes in both proliferating myoblasts and differentiated myotubes. We investigated the role of the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) myogenic determinator proteins MyoD and myogenin in this inhibition. Our data suggest that both MyoD and myogenin are not able to function as transcriptional activators in the presence of butyrate, although both apparently retain the ability to bind DNA. Transcription of MyoD itself is extinguished in butyrate-treated myoblasts and myotubes, an effect that may be due to the inability of MyoD to autoactivate its own transcription. We present evidence that the HLH region of MyoD is essential for butyrate inhibition of MyoD. In contrast to MyoD and myogenin, butyrate does not inhibit the ubiquitous basic HLH protein E2-5 from functioning as a transcriptional activator.
34
Johnston, L. A., S. J. Tapscott, and H. Eisen. "Sodium butyrate inhibits myogenesis by interfering with the transcriptional activation function of MyoD and myogenin." Molecular and Cellular Biology 12, no. 11 (November 1992): 5123–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mcb.12.11.5123-5130.1992.
Full textAbstract:
Sodium butyrate reversibly inhibits muscle differentiation and blocks the expression of many muscle-specific genes in both proliferating myoblasts and differentiated myotubes. We investigated the role of the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) myogenic determinator proteins MyoD and myogenin in this inhibition. Our data suggest that both MyoD and myogenin are not able to function as transcriptional activators in the presence of butyrate, although both apparently retain the ability to bind DNA. Transcription of MyoD itself is extinguished in butyrate-treated myoblasts and myotubes, an effect that may be due to the inability of MyoD to autoactivate its own transcription. We present evidence that the HLH region of MyoD is essential for butyrate inhibition of MyoD. In contrast to MyoD and myogenin, butyrate does not inhibit the ubiquitous basic HLH protein E2-5 from functioning as a transcriptional activator.
35
Abu Hatoum, Ossama, Shlomit Gross-Mesilaty, Kristin Breitschopf, Aviad Hoffman, Hedva Gonen, Aaron Ciechanover, and Eyal Bengal. "Degradation of Myogenic Transcription Factor MyoD by the Ubiquitin Pathway In Vivo and In Vitro: Regulation by Specific DNA Binding." Molecular and Cellular Biology 18, no. 10 (October 1, 1998): 5670–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mcb.18.10.5670.
Full textAbstract:
ABSTRACT MyoD is a tissue-specific transcriptional activator that acts as a master switch for skeletal muscle differentiation. Its activity is induced during the transition from proliferating, nondifferentiated myoblasts to resting, well-differentiated myotubes. Like many other transcriptional regulators, it is a short-lived protein; however, the targeting proteolytic pathway and the underlying regulatory mechanisms involved in the process have remained obscure. It has recently been shown that many short-lived regulatory proteins are degraded by the ubiquitin system. Degradation of a protein by the ubiquitin system proceeds via two distinct and successive steps, conjugation of multiple molecules of ubiquitin to the target protein and degradation of the tagged substrate by the 26S proteasome. Here we show that MyoD is degraded by the ubiquitin system both in vivo and in vitro. In intact cells, the degradation is inhibited by lactacystin, a specific inhibitor of the 26S proteasome. Inhibition is accompanied by accumulation of high-molecular-mass MyoD-ubiquitin conjugates. In a cell-free system, the proteolytic process requires both ATP and ubiquitin and, like the in vivo process, is preceded by formation of ubiquitin conjugates of the transcription factor. Interestingly, the process is inhibited by the specific DNA sequence to which MyoD binds: conjugation and degradation of a MyoD mutant protein which lacks the DNA-binding domain are not inhibited. The inhibitory effect of the DNA requires the formation of a complex between the DNA and the MyoD protein. Id1, which inhibits the binding of MyoD complexes to DNA, abrogates the effect of DNA on stabilization of the protein.
36
Datta, Bansidhar, Wang Min, Sandeep Burma, and Peter Lengyel. "Increase in p202 Expression during Skeletal Muscle Differentiation: Inhibition of MyoD Protein Expression and Activity by p202." Molecular and Cellular Biology 18, no. 2 (February 1, 1998): 1074–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mcb.18.2.1074.
Full textAbstract:
ABSTRACT p202 is a primarily nuclear, interferon-inducible murine protein that is encoded by the Ifi 202 gene. Overexpression of p202 in transfected cells retards cell proliferation. p202 modulates the pattern of gene expression by inhibiting the activity of various transcription factors including NF-κB, c-Fos, c-Jun, E2F-1, and p53. Here we report that p202 was constitutively expressed in mouse skeletal muscle and that the levels of 202 RNA and p202 greatly increased during the differentiation of cultured C2C12 myoblasts to myotubes. When overexpressed in transfected myoblasts, p202 inhibited the expression of one muscle protein (MyoD) without affecting the expression of a second one (myogenin). Thus, the decrease in the level of MyoD (but not of myogenin) during muscle differentiation may be the consequence of the increase in p202 level. Overexpressed p202 also inhibited the transcriptional activity of both MyoD and myogenin. This inhibition was correlated with an interaction of p202 with both proteins, as well as the inhibition by p202 of the sequence-specific binding of both proteins to DNA. This inhibition of the expression of MyoD and of the transcriptional activity of MyoD and myogenin may account for the inhibition of the induction of myoblast differentiation by premature overexpression of p202.
37
Wilson, Elizabeth M., Jolana Tureckova, and Peter Rotwein. "Permissive Roles of Phosphatidyl Inositol 3-Kinase and Akt in Skeletal Myocyte Maturation." Molecular Biology of the Cell 15, no. 2 (February 2004): 497–505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e03-05-0351.
Full textAbstract:
Skeletal muscle differentiation, maturation, and regeneration are regulated by interactions between signaling pathways activated by hormones and growth factors, and intrinsic genetic programs controlled by myogenic transcription factors, including members of the MyoD and myocyte enhancer factor 2 (MEF2) families. Insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) play key roles in muscle development in the embryo, and in the maintenance and hypertrophy of mature muscle in the adult, but the precise signaling pathways responsible for these effects remain incompletely defined. To study mechanisms of IGF action in muscle, we have developed a mouse myoblast cell line termed C2BP5 that is dependent on activation of the IGF-I receptor and the phosphatidyl inositol 3-kinase (PI3-kinase)-Akt pathway for initiation of differentiation. Here, we show that differentiation of C2BP5 myoblasts could be induced in the absence of IGF action by recombinant adenoviruses expressing MyoD or myogenin, but it was reversibly impaired by the PI3-kinase inhibitor LY294002. Similar results were observed using a dominant-negative version of Akt, a key downstream component of PI3-kinase signaling, and also were seen in C3H 10T1/2 fibroblasts. Inhibition of PI3-kinase did not prevent accumulation of muscle differentiation-specific proteins (myogenin, troponin T, or myosin heavy chain), did not block transcriptional activation of E-box containing muscle reporter genes by MyoD or myogenin, and did not inhibit the expression or function of endogenous MEF2C or MEF2D. An adenovirus encoding active Akt could partially restore terminal differentiation of MyoD-expressing and LY294002-treated myoblasts, but the resultant myofibers contained fewer nuclei and were smaller and thinner than normal, indicating that another PI3-kinase-stimulated pathway in addition to Akt is required for full myocyte maturation. Our results support the idea that an IGF-regulated PI3-kinase pathway functions downstream of or in parallel with MyoD, myogenin, and MEF2 in muscle development to govern the late steps of differentiation that lead to multinucleated myotubes.
38
Lin, H., K. E. Yutzey, and S. F. Konieczny. "Muscle-specific expression of the troponin I gene requires interactions between helix-loop-helix muscle regulatory factors and ubiquitous transcription factors." Molecular and Cellular Biology 11, no. 1 (January 1991): 267–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mcb.11.1.267.
Full textAbstract:
The quail fast skeletal troponin I (TnI) gene is a member of the contractile protein gene set and is expressed exclusively in differentiated skeletal muscle cells. TnI gene transcription is controlled by an internal regulatory element (IRE), located within the first intron, that functions as a muscle-specific enhancer. Recent studies have shown that the TnI IRE may interact directly with the muscle regulatory factors MyoD, myogenin, and Myf-5 to produce a muscle-specific expression pattern, since these factors trans-activate cotransfected TnI gene constructs in C3H10T1/2 fibroblasts. In this study, we have examined the protein-IRE interactions that are responsible for transcriptionally activating the TnI gene during skeletal muscle development. We demonstrate that the helix-loop-helix muscle regulatory factors MyoD, myogenin, Myf-5, and MRF4, when complexed with the immunoglobulin enhancer-binding protein E12, interact with identical nucleotides within a muscle regulatory factor-binding site (MRF site) located in the TnI IRE. The nuclear proteins that bind to the MRF site are restricted to skeletal muscle cells, since protein extracts from HeLa, L, and C3H10T1/2 fibroblasts do not contain similar binding activities. Importantly, the TnI MRF site alone is not sufficient to elicit the full enhancer activity associated with the IRE. Instead, two additional regions (site I and site II) are required. The proteins that interact with site I and site II are expressed in both muscle and nonmuscle cell types and by themselves are ineffective in activating TnI gene expression. However, when the MRF site is positioned upstream or downstream of site I and site II, full enhancer activity is restored. We conclude that helix-loop-helix muscle regulatory factors must interact with ubiquitously expressed proteins to generate the active TnI transcription complex that is present in differentiated muscle fibers.
39
Lin, H., K. E. Yutzey, and S. F. Konieczny. "Muscle-specific expression of the troponin I gene requires interactions between helix-loop-helix muscle regulatory factors and ubiquitous transcription factors." Molecular and Cellular Biology 11, no. 1 (January 1991): 267–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mcb.11.1.267-280.1991.
Full textAbstract:
The quail fast skeletal troponin I (TnI) gene is a member of the contractile protein gene set and is expressed exclusively in differentiated skeletal muscle cells. TnI gene transcription is controlled by an internal regulatory element (IRE), located within the first intron, that functions as a muscle-specific enhancer. Recent studies have shown that the TnI IRE may interact directly with the muscle regulatory factors MyoD, myogenin, and Myf-5 to produce a muscle-specific expression pattern, since these factors trans-activate cotransfected TnI gene constructs in C3H10T1/2 fibroblasts. In this study, we have examined the protein-IRE interactions that are responsible for transcriptionally activating the TnI gene during skeletal muscle development. We demonstrate that the helix-loop-helix muscle regulatory factors MyoD, myogenin, Myf-5, and MRF4, when complexed with the immunoglobulin enhancer-binding protein E12, interact with identical nucleotides within a muscle regulatory factor-binding site (MRF site) located in the TnI IRE. The nuclear proteins that bind to the MRF site are restricted to skeletal muscle cells, since protein extracts from HeLa, L, and C3H10T1/2 fibroblasts do not contain similar binding activities. Importantly, the TnI MRF site alone is not sufficient to elicit the full enhancer activity associated with the IRE. Instead, two additional regions (site I and site II) are required. The proteins that interact with site I and site II are expressed in both muscle and nonmuscle cell types and by themselves are ineffective in activating TnI gene expression. However, when the MRF site is positioned upstream or downstream of site I and site II, full enhancer activity is restored. We conclude that helix-loop-helix muscle regulatory factors must interact with ubiquitously expressed proteins to generate the active TnI transcription complex that is present in differentiated muscle fibers.
40
Shih, Heather H., Sergei G. Tevosian, and Amy S. Yee. "Regulation of Differentiation by HBP1, a Target of the Retinoblastoma Protein." Molecular and Cellular Biology 18, no. 8 (August 1, 1998): 4732–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mcb.18.8.4732.
Full textAbstract:
ABSTRACT Differentiation is a coordinated process of irreversible cell cycle exit and tissue-specific gene expression. To probe the functions of the retinoblastoma protein (RB) family in cell differentiation, we isolated HBP1 as a specific target of RB and p130. Our previous work showed that HBP1 was a transcriptional repressor and a cell cycle inhibitor. The induction of HBP1, RB, and p130 upon differentiation in the muscle C2C12 cells suggested a coordinated role. Here we report that the expression of HBP1 unexpectedly blocked muscle cell differentiation without interfering with cell cycle exit. Moreover, the expression of MyoD and myogenin, but not Myf5, was inhibited in HBP1-expressing cells. HBP1 inhibited transcriptional activation by the MyoD family members. The inhibition of MyoD family function by HBP1 required binding to RB and/or p130. Since Myf5 might function upstream of MyoD, our data suggested that HBP1 probably blocked differentiation by disrupting Myf5 function, thus preventing expression of MyoD and myogenin. Consistent with this, the expression of each MyoD family member could reverse the inhibition of differentiation by HBP1. Further investigation implicated the relative ratio of RB to HBP1 as a determinant of whether cell cycle exit or full differentiation occurred. At a low RB/HBP1 ratio cell cycle exit occurred but there was no tissue-specific gene expression. At elevated RB/HBP1 ratios full differentiation occurred. Similar changes in the RB/HBP1 ratio have been observed in normal C2 differentiation. Thus, we postulate that the relative ratio of RB to HBP1 may be one signal for activation of the MyoD family. We propose a model in which a checkpoint of positive and negative regulation may coordinate cell cycle exit with MyoD family activation to give fidelity and progression in differentiation.
41
Lin, Yung-Jui, Chien-Han Kao, Sheng-Pin Hsiao, and Shen-Liang Chen. "The cooperation of cis-elements during M-cadherin promoter activation." Biochemical Journal 478, no. 4 (February 26, 2021): 911–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/bcj20200535.
Full textAbstract:
M-cadherin is a skeletal muscle-specific transmembrane protein mediating the cell-cell adhesion of myoblasts during myogenesis. It is expressed in the proliferating satellite cells and highly induced by myogenic regulatory factors (MRFs) during terminal myogenic differentiation. Several conserved cis-elements, including 5 E-boxes, 2 GC boxes, and 1 conserved downstream element (CDE) were identified in the M-cadherin proximal promoter. We found that E-box-3 and -4 close to the transcription initiation site (TIS) mediated most of its transactivation by MyoD, the strongest myogenic MRF. Including of any one of the other E-boxes restored the full activation by MyoD, suggesting an essential collaboration between E-boxes. Stronger activation of M-cadherin promoter than that of muscle creatine kinase (MCK) by MyoD was observed regardless of culture conditions and the presence of E47. Furthermore, MyoD/E47 heterodimer and MyoD ∼ E47 fusion protein achieved similar levels of activation in differentiation medium (DM), suggesting high affinity of MyoD/E47 to E-boxes 3/4 under DM. We also found that GC boxes and CDE positively affected MyoD mediated activation. The CDE element was predicted to be the target of the chromatin-modifying factor Meis1/Pbx1 heterodimer. Knockdown of Pbx1 significantly reduced the expression level of M-cadherin, but increased that of N-cadherin. Using ChIP assay, we further found significant reduction in MyoD recruitment to M-cadherin promoter when CDE was deleted. Taken together, these observations suggest that the chromatin-modifying function of Pbx1/Meis1 is critical to M-cadherin promoter activation before MyoD is recruited to E-boxes to trigger transcription.
42
Gillespie, Mark A., Fabien Le Grand, Anthony Scimè, Shihuan Kuang, Julia von Maltzahn, Vanessa Seale, Ana Cuenda, Jeffrey A. Ranish, and Michael A. Rudnicki. "p38-γ–dependent gene silencing restricts entry into the myogenic differentiation program." Journal of Cell Biology 187, no. 7 (December 21, 2009): 991–1005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200907037.
Full textAbstract:
The mitogen-activated protein kinase p38-γ is highly expressed in skeletal muscle and is associated with the dystrophin glycoprotein complex; however, its function remains unclear. After induced damage, muscle in mice lacking p38-γ generated significantly fewer myofibers than wild-type muscle. Notably, p38-γ-deficient muscle contained 50% fewer satellite cells that exhibited premature Myogenin expression and markedly reduced proliferation. We determined that p38-γ directly phosphorylated MyoD on Ser199 and Ser200, which results in enhanced occupancy of MyoD on the promoter of myogenin together with markedly decreased transcriptional activity. This repression is associated with extensive methylation of histone H3K9 together with recruitment of the KMT1A methyltransferase to the myogenin promoter. Notably, a MyoD S199A/S200A mutant exhibits markedly reduced binding to KMT1A. Therefore, p38-γ signaling directly induces the assembly of a repressive MyoD transcriptional complex. Together, these results establish a hitherto unappreciated and essential role for p38-γ signaling in positively regulating the expansion of transient amplifying myogenic precursor cells during muscle growth and regeneration.
43
Song, An, Qi Wang, Mark G. Goebl, and Maureen A. Harrington. "Phosphorylation of Nuclear MyoD Is Required for Its Rapid Degradation." Molecular and Cellular Biology 18, no. 9 (September 1, 1998): 4994–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mcb.18.9.4994.
Full textAbstract:
ABSTRACT MyoD is a basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor involved in the activation of genes encoding skeletal muscle-specific proteins. Independent of its ability to transactivate muscle-specific genes, MyoD can also act as a cell cycle inhibitor. MyoD activity is regulated by transcriptional and posttranscriptional mechanisms. While MyoD can be found phosphorylated, the functional significance of this posttranslation modification has not been established. MyoD contains several consensus cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) phosphorylation sites. In these studies, we examined whether a link could be established between MyoD activity and phosphorylation at putative CDK sites. Site-directed mutagenesis of potential CDK phosphorylation sites in MyoD revealed that S200 is required for MyoD hyperphosphorylation as well as the normally short half-life of the MyoD protein. Additionally, we determined that turnover of the MyoD protein requires the proteasome and Cdc34 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme activity. Results of these studies demonstrate that hyperphosphorylated MyoD is targeted for rapid degradation by the ubiquitin pathway. The targeted degradation of MyoD following CDK phosphorylation identifies a mechanism through which MyoD activity can be regulated coordinately with the cell cycle machinery (CDK2 and CDK4) and/or coordinately with the cellular transcriptional machinery (CDK7, CDK8, and CDK9).
44
Kong, Y., S. E. Johnson, E. J. Taparowsky, and S. F. Konieczny. "Ras p21Val inhibits myogenesis without altering the DNA binding or transcriptional activities of the myogenic basic helix-loop-helix factors." Molecular and Cellular Biology 15, no. 10 (October 1995): 5205–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mcb.15.10.5205.
Full textAbstract:
MRF4, MyoD, myogenin, and Myf-5 are muscle-specific basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors that share the ability to activate the expression of skeletal muscle genes such as those encoding alpha-actin, myosin heavy chain, and the acetylcholine receptor subunits. The muscle regulatory factors (MRFs) also exhibit the unique capacity to initiate the myogenic program when ectopically expressed in a variety of nonmuscle cell types, most notably C3H10T1/2 fibroblasts (10T1/2 cells). The commitment of myoblasts to terminal differentiation, although positively regulated by the MRFs, also is controlled negatively by a variety of agents, including several growth factors and oncoproteins such as fibroblast growth factor (FGF-2), transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-beta 1), and Ras p21Val. The molecular mechanisms by which these varied agents alter myogenic terminal differentiation events remain unclear. In an effort to establish whether Ras p21Val represses MRF activity by directly targeting the MRF proteins, we examined the DNA binding and transcription activation potentials of MRF4 and MyoD when expressed in 10T1/2 cells or in 10T1/2 cells expressing Ras p21Val. Our results demonstrate that Ras p21Val inhibits terminal differentiation events by targeting the basic domain of the MRFs, and yet the mechanism underlying this inhibition does not involve altering the DNA binding or the inherent transcriptional activity of these regulatory factors. In contrast, FGF-2 and TGF-beta 1 block terminal differentiation by repressing the transcriptional activity of the MRFs. We conclude that the Ras p21Val block in differentiation operates via an intracellular signaling pathway that is distinct from the FGF-2 and TGF-beta 1 pathways.
45
Parmacek, M. S., H. S. Ip, F. Jung, T. Shen, J. F. Martin, A. J. Vora, E. N. Olson, and J. M. Leiden. "A novel myogenic regulatory circuit controls slow/cardiac troponin C gene transcription in skeletal muscle." Molecular and Cellular Biology 14, no. 3 (March 1994): 1870–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mcb.14.3.1870.
Full textAbstract:
The slow/cardiac troponin C (cTnC) gene is expressed in three distinct striated muscle lineages: cardiac myocytes, embryonic fast skeletal myotubes, and adult slow skeletal myocytes. We have reported previously that cTnC gene expression in cardiac muscle is regulated by a cardiac-specific promoter/enhancer located in the 5' flanking region of the gene (bp -124 to +1). In this report, we demonstrate that the cTnC gene contains a second distinct and independent transcriptional enhancer which is located in the first intron. This second enhancer is skeletal myotube specific and is developmentally up-regulated during the differentiation of myoblasts to myotubes. This enhancer contains three functionally important nuclear protein binding sites: a CACCC box, a MEF-2 binding site, and a previously undescribed nuclear protein binding site, designated MEF-3, which is also present in a large number of skeletal muscle-specific transcriptional enhancers. Unlike most skeletal muscle-specific transcriptional regulatory elements, the cTnC enhancer does not contain a consensus binding site (CANNTG) for the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) family of transcription factors and does not directly bind MyoD-E12 protein complexes. Despite these findings, the cTnC enhancer can be transactivated by overexpression of the myogenic bHLH proteins, MyoD and myogenin, in C3H10T1/2 (10T1/2) cells. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays demonstrated changes in the patterns of MEF-2, CACCC, and MEF-3 DNA binding activities following the conversion of 10T1/2 cells into myoblasts and myotubes by stable transfection with a MyoD expression vector. In particular, MEF-2 binding activity was up-regulated in 10T1/2 cells stably transfected with a MyoD expression vector only after these cells fused and differentiated into skeletal myotubes. Taken together, these results demonstrated that distinct lineage-specific transcriptional regulatory elements control the expression of a single myofibrillar protein gene in fast skeletal and cardiac muscle. In addition, they show that bHLH transcription factors can indirectly transactivate the expression of some muscle-specific genes.
46
Parmacek, M. S., H. S. Ip, F. Jung, T. Shen, J. F. Martin, A. J. Vora, E. N. Olson, and J. M. Leiden. "A novel myogenic regulatory circuit controls slow/cardiac troponin C gene transcription in skeletal muscle." Molecular and Cellular Biology 14, no. 3 (March 1994): 1870–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mcb.14.3.1870-1885.1994.
Full textAbstract:
The slow/cardiac troponin C (cTnC) gene is expressed in three distinct striated muscle lineages: cardiac myocytes, embryonic fast skeletal myotubes, and adult slow skeletal myocytes. We have reported previously that cTnC gene expression in cardiac muscle is regulated by a cardiac-specific promoter/enhancer located in the 5' flanking region of the gene (bp -124 to +1). In this report, we demonstrate that the cTnC gene contains a second distinct and independent transcriptional enhancer which is located in the first intron. This second enhancer is skeletal myotube specific and is developmentally up-regulated during the differentiation of myoblasts to myotubes. This enhancer contains three functionally important nuclear protein binding sites: a CACCC box, a MEF-2 binding site, and a previously undescribed nuclear protein binding site, designated MEF-3, which is also present in a large number of skeletal muscle-specific transcriptional enhancers. Unlike most skeletal muscle-specific transcriptional regulatory elements, the cTnC enhancer does not contain a consensus binding site (CANNTG) for the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) family of transcription factors and does not directly bind MyoD-E12 protein complexes. Despite these findings, the cTnC enhancer can be transactivated by overexpression of the myogenic bHLH proteins, MyoD and myogenin, in C3H10T1/2 (10T1/2) cells. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays demonstrated changes in the patterns of MEF-2, CACCC, and MEF-3 DNA binding activities following the conversion of 10T1/2 cells into myoblasts and myotubes by stable transfection with a MyoD expression vector. In particular, MEF-2 binding activity was up-regulated in 10T1/2 cells stably transfected with a MyoD expression vector only after these cells fused and differentiated into skeletal myotubes. Taken together, these results demonstrated that distinct lineage-specific transcriptional regulatory elements control the expression of a single myofibrillar protein gene in fast skeletal and cardiac muscle. In addition, they show that bHLH transcription factors can indirectly transactivate the expression of some muscle-specific genes.
47
Braun, T., E. Bober, M. A. Rudnicki, R. Jaenisch, and H. H. Arnold. "MyoD expression marks the onset of skeletal myogenesis in Myf-5 mutant mice." Development 120, no. 11 (November 1, 1994): 3083–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.120.11.3083.
Full textAbstract:
The expression pattern of myogenic regulatory factors and myotome-specific contractile proteins was studied during embryonic development of Myf-5 mutant mice by in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. In contrast to somites in wild-type embryos, no expression of myogenin and Myf-6 (MRF4), or any other myotomal markers was detected in mutant animals at E9.0 and E10.0 indicating that Myf-5 plays a crucial role during this developmental period. Significantly, the onset of MyoD expression in rostral somites of E10.5 embryos was unaffected by the Myf-5 mutation suggesting that the activation of the MyoD gene occurs independently of Myf-5 at the correct developmental time. Immediately after the activation of MyoD myogenin transcripts and protein accumulated within the myotome. The first contractile proteins of the sarcomeric apparatus appeared slightly later. By E11.5 the expression of muscle markers were indistinguishable between wild-type and Myf-5 mutant mice. The migration of muscle precursor cells that leave the somites to form limb musculature was monitored in Myf-5-mutant mice by Pax-3 expression. Pax-3-positive cells were equally found in somites and limbs of E10.0 wild-type and mutant mice indicating that myogenic factor expression at the level of somites is not a prerequisite for determination and subsequent migration of limb precursor cells.
48
Rosenberg, Miriam I., Sara A. Georges, Amy Asawachaicharn, Erwin Analau, and Stephen J. Tapscott. "MyoD inhibits Fstl1 and Utrn expression by inducing transcription of miR-206." Journal of Cell Biology 175, no. 1 (October 9, 2006): 77–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200603039.
Full textAbstract:
Terminal differentiation of distinct cell types requires the transcriptional activation of differentiation-specific genes and the suppression of genes associated with the precursor cell. For example, the expression of utrophin (Utrn) is suppressed during skeletal muscle differentiation, and it is replaced at the sarcolemma by the related dystrophin protein. The MyoD transcription factor directly activates the expression of a large number of skeletal muscle genes, but also suppresses the expression of many genes. To characterize a mechanism of MyoD-mediated suppression of gene expression, we investigated two genes that are suppressed in fibroblasts converted to skeletal muscle by MyoD, follistatin-like 1 (Fstl1) and Utrn. MyoD directly activates the expression of a muscle-specific microRNA (miRNA), miR-206, which targets sequences in the Fstl1 and Utrn RNA, and these sequences are sufficient to suppress gene expression in the presence of miR-206. These findings demonstrate that MyoD, in addition to activating muscle-specific genes, induces miRNAs that repress gene expression during skeletal muscle differentiation.
49
Wheeler, Matthew T., Emily C. Snyder, Melissa N. Patterson, and Steven J. Swoap. "An E-box within the MHC IIB gene is bound by MyoD and is required for gene expression in fast muscle." American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology 276, no. 5 (May 1, 1999): C1069—C1078. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.1999.276.5.c1069.
Full textAbstract:
The myosin heavy chain (MHC) IIB gene is selectively expressed in skeletal muscles, imparting fast contractile kinetics. Why the MHC IIB gene product is expressed in muscles like the tibialis anterior (TA) and not expressed in muscles like the soleus is currently unclear. It is shown here that the mutation of an E-box within the MHC IIB promoter decreased reporter gene activity in the fast-twitch TA muscle 90-fold as compared with the wild-type promoter. Reporter gene expression within the TA required this E-box for activation of a heterologous construct containing upstream regulatory regions of the MHC IIB promoter linked to the basal 70-kDa heat shock protein TATA promoter. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays demonstrated that mutation of the E-box prevented the binding of both MyoD and myogenin to this element. In cotransfected C2C12myotubes and Hep G2 cells, MyoD preferentially activated the MHC IIB promoter in an E-box-dependent manner, whereas myogenin activated the MHC IIB promoter to a lesser extent, and in an E-box-independent manner. A time course analysis of hindlimb suspension demonstrated that the unweighted soleus muscle activated expression of MyoD mRNA before the de novo expression of MHC IIB mRNA. These data suggest a possible causative role for MyoD in the observed upregulation of MHC IIB in the unweighted soleus muscle.
50
Carnac, Gilles, Michael Primig, Magali Kitzmann, Philippe Chafey, David Tuil, Ned Lamb, and Anne Fernandez. "RhoA GTPase and Serum Response Factor Control Selectively the Expression of MyoD without Affecting Myf5 in Mouse Myoblasts." Molecular Biology of the Cell 9, no. 7 (July 1998): 1891–902. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.9.7.1891.
Full textAbstract:
MyoD and Myf5 belong to the family of basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors that are key operators in skeletal muscle differentiation. MyoD and Myf5 genes are selectively activated during development in a time and region-specific manner and in response to different stimuli. However, molecules that specifically regulate the expression of these two genes and the pathways involved remain to be determined. We have recently shown that the serum response factor (SRF), a transcription factor involved in activation of both mitogenic response and muscle differentiation, is required for MyoD gene expression. We have investigated here whether SRF is also involved in the control of Myf5 gene expression, and the potential role of upstream regulators of SRF activity, the Rho family G-proteins including Rho, Rac, and CDC42, in the regulation of MyoD and Myf5. We show that inactivation of SRF does not alter Myf5 gene expression, whereas it causes a rapid extinction of MyoD gene expression. Furthermore, we show that RhoA, but not Rac or CDC42, is also required for the expression of MyoD. Indeed, blocking the activity of G-proteins using the general inhibitor lovastatin, or more specific antagonists of Rho proteins such as C3-transferase or dominant negative RhoA protein, resulted in a dramatic decrease of MyoD protein levels and promoter activity without any effects on Myf5 expression. We further show that RhoA-dependent transcriptional activation required functional SRF in C2 muscle cells. These data illustrate that MyoD and Myf5 are regulated by different upstream activation pathways in which MyoD expression is specifically modulated by a RhoA/SRF signaling cascade. In addition, our results establish the first link between RhoA protein activity and the expression of a key muscle regulator.