Relevant bibliographies by topics / Sociological aspects of Israel-Arab War, 1967

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Books
  3. Book chapters

Academic literature on the topic 'Sociological aspects of Israel-Arab War, 1967'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 16 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Sociological aspects of Israel-Arab War, 1967.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Sociological aspects of Israel-Arab War, 1967"

1

Einhorn, Talia. "Restitution of Archaeological Artifacts: The Arab-Israeli Aspects." International Journal of Cultural Property 5, no. 1 (January 1996): 133–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0940739196000252.

Full text
Abstract:
SummarySince the second half of the last century, public international law has been developing rules regulating the restitution of cultural objects removed from occupied territories during armed conflict. Today it is generally recognized that customary international law forbids pillage. The Protocol to the 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict further mandates that artifacts removed from an occupied territory must be returned to the competent authorities of that territory at the close of hostilities. The Arab-Israeli case highlights the problematic side of this solution. Following the Six Day War in 1967, the Sinai Peninsula, the Golan Heights, the Gaza strip and the territory known as the “West Bank” came under Israeli control. Israeli archaeologists carried out numerous excavations, and discovered artifacts of special importance to Jewish cultural heritage. It is regrettable that, as a result of the peace treaty with Egypt, these artifacts can no longer be exhibited and appreciated at the Israel Museum in Jerusalem, but had to be delivered to Egypt, where they now face an uncertain future. A similar fate may befall the artifacts excavated in the Golan Heights. The Palestinian claim for restitution cannot be based on the Protocol. The Problem is nevertheless the same in all cases; if the artifacts are to be preserved, properly appreciated and made available for purposes of study and research, it may be more appropriate to distribute them among the states by way of compromise and agreement, that will seek to enhance their cultural significance, rather than use the arbitrary sole criterion of the place of discovery.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Krylov, A. V. "The problem of the status of the Holy Places in Jerusalem and its impact on the Palestinian-Israeli conflict." Journal of International Analytics, no. 2 (June 28, 2016): 67–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2016-0-2-67-82.

Full text
Abstract:
This article focuses on the legal status of Jerusalem - one of the most complex and debated issues of international law and international politics. Before the establishment of Israel in 1948, over the centuries in the Ottoman period and the years of the British Mandate there was no legally binding bilateral or international treaty that would clearly define the legal status of Jerusalem. However, both the Turkish authorities and the British administration in Palestine preceding from the fact that Jerusalem is the center of three world religions, fully ensured of the rights of believers of all confessions. In accordance with the well-known international instruments of law all Jerusalem should be a special territory of Corpus Separatum, which will be subjected to the international control (UN General Assembly Resolution 181 / II of 29 November 1947). However, in 1980 the Israeli Parliament declared Jerusalem the «eternal and undivided capital» of Israel, including the Arab territories of East Jerusalem occupied in 1967. This law, as well as the Israeli law on the protection of the Holy Places has radically changed the Status quo which existed for centuries. No country in the world recognizes Israel’s attempts to change the legal Status of the City. In the present article the following aspects are analyzed: • The Status of the Holy Places in Jerusalem, before the establishment of the British mandate over Palestine in 1922; • The Status of the Holy Places in Jerusalem in accordance with the international law instruments; • The Status of the Holy Places in Jerusalem after the partition of the City on the Israeli and Jordanian enclaves in 1948; • Change of the Status of the Holy Places of Jerusalem after the June 1967 War and the impact of this transformation both on the Arab-Israeli and the Palestinian-Israeli conflicts; • Actions taken by Israel to change the Status of the Temple Mount; • The problem of the Status of Jerusalem in the Palestinian-Israeli Peace Process.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Sociological aspects of Israel-Arab War, 1967"

1

Amin, Galal A. al- Muthaqqafūn al-ʻArab wa-Isrāʾīl. al-Qāhirah: Dār al-Shurūq, 1998.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Bakr, Midḥat Abū. Muḥāwalāt tahwīd al-insān al-Miṣrī. Ḥammāmāt al-Qubbah, al-Qāhirah: Miṣr al-ʻArabīyah lil-Nashr wa-al-Tawzīʻ, 1987.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Bakr, Midḥat Abū. Muḥāwalāt tahwīd al-insān al-Miṣrī. Ḥammāmāt al-Qubbah, al-Qāhirah: Miṣr al-ʻArabīyah lil-Nashr wa-al-Tawzīʻ, 1987.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Ḳunṭres Dibrot ḳodesh: Be-shabatot Naśo, Be-haʻalotkha, Shelaḥ, Ḳoraḥ shenat 727 ... : uve-farashat Ṿa-yishlaḥ shenat 717 ... uva-kinus ha-kelali ... 721 ... Ḳiryat Yoʼel: Maʻatiḳe shemuʻah, 2007.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Itzhak, Shnell, ed. The impacts of lasting occupation: Lessons from Israeli society. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Ḳunṭres Dibrot ḳodesh: Bi-yeme ha-shovavim. Bruḳlin: Ḥevrah Maʻtiḳe shemuʻah, 2005.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Teitelbaum, Joel. Ḳunṭres Dibrot ḳodesh: Be-yom Hoshaʻna Rabah. Bruḳlin, N.Y: Ḥevrah "Maʻtiḳe shemuʻah", 2004.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Ginbar, Yuval. Israeli settlement in the occupied territories as a violation of human rights: Legal and conceptual aspects. Jerusalem: Bʼtselem, The Israeli Information Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories, 1997.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

author, Jiryis Ḥusām, ed. Dawlat rafāh al-mustawṭinīn: Al-iqtiṣād al-siyāsī lil-mustawṭanāt. Rām Allāh: Madār, al-Markaz al-Filasṭīnī lil-Dirāsāt al-Isrāʼīlīyah, 2013.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Itzhak, Shnell, ed. Hashpaʻat ha-kibush ʻal ha-ḥevrah ha-Yiśreʼelit. [Jerusalem]: ha-Agudah ha-Yiśreʼelit le-madaʻ ha-medinah, 2013.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Sociological aspects of Israel-Arab War, 1967"

1

Smith, Charles. "12. The Arab–Israeli Conflict." In International Relations of the Middle East. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198708742.003.0013.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter examines the military, political, and economic aspects of the Arab–Israel conflict over time. The Arab–Israeli conflict refers to the belligerency between the Arab states and Israel. The first Arab–Israeli War broke out immediately after the proclamation of the state of Israel on 14 May 1948, followed by other conflicts such as the 1967 and 1973 wars. The chapter first provides a historical background on the creation of Israel and how the Six Day War in 1967 gave rise to Arab nationalist rivalries and led to the re-emergence of the Palestinian factor in the Arab–Israeli conflict. It then considers the Egyptian–Israeli peace treaty and the Oslo peace process and shows how both realism and the contours of identity politics inform the position of different states in the conflict. It also discusses the relations between Palestine and Israel during the period 2000–2015.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Smith, Charles. "12. The Arab–Israeli Conflict." In International Relations of the Middle East, 271–97. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198809425.003.0012.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter discusses different aspects of the Arab–Israeli conflict over time — military, political, and economic. The first two decades of the Arab–Israeli conflict, often marked by armed hostilities, were notable for Arab refusal to recognize Israel's existence. Since the 1967 war, Arab states, specifically Syria and Saudi Arabia, have displayed willingness to recognize Israel, and two, Egypt and Jordan, have signed peace treaties; Yasser Arafat recognized Israel's right to exist in the 1993 Oslo agreement. In this regard, most Arab states have adopted a realist approach to the Arab–Israeli conflict, seeking coexistence based in part on acceptance of Israel's military supremacy. In contrast, Israel appears to insist on security through regional domination, coupled with retention of the West Bank as Greater Israel.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Sociological aspects of Israel-Arab War, 1967' for particular source types:
Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography