Academic literature on the topic 'Softer Defined Networking (SDN)'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Softer Defined Networking (SDN).'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Softer Defined Networking (SDN)"
Guesmi, Tawfik, Anwar Kalghoum, Badr M. Alshammari, Haitham Alsaif, and Ahmed Alzamil. "Leveraging Software-Defined Networking Approach for Future Information-Centric Networking Enhancement." Symmetry 13, no. 3 (March 9, 2021): 441. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sym13030441.
Full textBenzekki, Kamal, Abdeslam El Fergougui, and Abdelbaki Elbelrhiti Elalaoui. "Software-defined networking (SDN): a survey." Security and Communication Networks 9, no. 18 (December 2016): 5803–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sec.1737.
Full textTian, Chen, Jie Wu, and Haibin Song. "Software-Defined Networking in Access Networks." International Journal of Web Services Research 12, no. 1 (January 2015): 1–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/ijwsr.2015010101.
Full textMustafa, Firas M. "Software Defined Networking Based Optical Network: A review." Academic Journal of Nawroz University 9, no. 2 (June 29, 2020): 139. http://dx.doi.org/10.25007/ajnu.v9n2a718.
Full textBabbar, Himanshi, and Shalli Rani. "Emerging Prospects and Trends in Software Defined Networking." Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience 16, no. 10 (October 1, 2019): 4236–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1166/jctn.2019.8506.
Full textHussein, A., Louma Chadad, Nareg Adalian, Ali Chehab, Imad H. Elhajj, and Ayman Kayssi. "Software-Defined Networking (SDN): the security review." Journal of Cyber Security Technology 4, no. 1 (August 8, 2019): 1–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23742917.2019.1629529.
Full textKarakus, Murat, and Arjan Durresi. "Economic Viability of Software Defined Networking (SDN)." Computer Networks 135 (April 2018): 81–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2018.02.015.
Full textAli, Tariq Emad, Ameer Hussein Morad, and Mohammed A. Abdala. "Traffic management inside software-defined data centre networking." Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics 9, no. 5 (October 1, 2020): 2045–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.11591/eei.v9i5.1928.
Full textFondo-Ferreiro, Pablo, and Felipe Gil-Castiñeira. "The Role of Software-Defined Networking in Cellular Networks." Proceedings 21, no. 1 (July 31, 2019): 23. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019021023.
Full textFarhady, Hamid, and Akihiro Nakao. "Tag-Based Classification for Software-Defined Networking." International Journal of Grid and High Performance Computing 7, no. 1 (January 2015): 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/ijghpc.2015010101.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Softer Defined Networking (SDN)"
Liver, Toma, and Mohammed Darian. "Soft Migration from Traditional to Software Defined Networks." Thesis, Mälardalens högskola, Akademin för innovation, design och teknik, 2019. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-44265.
Full textPitzus, Antonio. "SDN : Software Defined Networking." Bachelor's thesis, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, 2017. http://amslaurea.unibo.it/14006/.
Full textJiménez, Agudelo Yury Andrea. "Scalability and robustness in software-defined networking (SDN)." Doctoral thesis, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/397652.
Full textEn las redes tradicionales, los operadores de red son responsables de proporcionar una configuración de red lo suficientemente robusta que permita gestionar los diferentes tipos de eventos que puedan afectar el funcionamiento de esta y los requerimientos de los servicios. Esto es difícil de alcanzar dado que: i) el funcionamiento de las redes puede variar en cualquier momento y las redes actuales no cuentan con un mecanismo que les permita reaccionar eficientemente al amplio rango de eventos que pueden ocurrir y ii) la naturaleza estática de las elementos de red no permite una detallada configuración dado que su hardware/software no pueden ser modificados de una manera eficiente. El impredecible crecimiento de la red en terminos de su tamaño y su heterogeneidad, han expuesto un número de complejidades en la actual arquitectura de red. Primero, los elementos de red tienen que soportar un gran número de comandos/configuraciones sobre un especifico sistema operativo, dificultando la instalación de un nuevo software sobre ellos, debido a incompatibilidades con el hardware o debido a que el software es incapaz de gestionar las capacidades del hardware. Segundo, la configuración manual de las funciones de control sobre los elementos de red pueden llevar a configurar erróneamente las tablas de enrutamiento. Finalmente, la integración vertical de los middleboxes dificulta a los operadores especificar las políticas de alto nivel sobre las tradicionales tecnologías de red. La gestión de la red requiere un sistema inteligente y eficiente que coordine: i) los miles de elementos y aplicaciones presentes en la red, ii) la alta demanda sobre el rendimiento de la red y iii) la creciente complejidad en la configuración de las redes. En las últimas décadas, diferentes soluciones han sido propuestas con el objetivo de mejorar la gestión de la red, tales como MPLS, virtualización y las redes programables. En este último caso, las redes definidas por software o SDNs permiten a los desarrolladores de software gestionar los recursos de red en una manera fácil, dado que la distribución del estado de la red es unificado, lo cual permite gestionar cualquier tipo de red en una manera transparente y en tiempo eficiente. En SDN, la inteligencia de la red esta lógicamente centralizada en unos elementos de red llamados controladores, de modo que los demás elementos que actúan en la red solo transmiten paquetes hacia el destino. Estos elementos, son configurados por los controladores a través de una interface abierta. Es decir, SDN desacopla la capa de control de la capa de datos permitiendo que los elementos de red puedan ser programados y re-configurados independiente del tipo de red. Aún cuando SDN es reciente, este ha sido estandarizado e implementado por diferentes compañías (ej. Google). Sin embargo, hay varios desafios por resolver en SDN aún. Algunos de estos desafios están relacionados con: i) la escalabilidad de los controladores, como estos están centralizados, ii) la robustez de la capa de control, dado que un fallo en esta puede dejar los elementos de red sin conexión con el controlador, iii) la consistencia de la información de control, para evitar tomar decisiones que afecten la operación de la red, y finalmente iv) la seguridad. En esta tesis, los primeros tres desafios son tratados desde el punto de vista de la localización de los controladores en la red, los cuales son seleccionados teniendo en cuenta los requerimientos de los servicios/aplicaciones y las características de la red. La primera contribución de esta tesis es un algoritmo que selecciona el número de controladores y su localización en la red. Un parámetro de robustez que permite seleccionar los controladores desde los cuales se construye una capa de control robusta y también puede medir la robustez de cualquier capa de control, es definida. Finalmente, un protocolo que descubre la topología y características de cualquier red es propuesto y evaluado.
Hossain, Md Billal. "QoS-Aware Intelligent Routing For Software Defined Networking." University of Akron / OhioLINK, 2020. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=akron1595086618729923.
Full textTseng, Yuchia. "Securing network applications in software defined networking." Electronic Thesis or Diss., Sorbonne Paris Cité, 2018. http://www.theses.fr/2018USPCB036.
Full textThe rapid development and convergence of computing technologies and communications create the need to connect diverse devices with different operating systems and protocols. This resulted in numerous challenges to provide seamless integration of a large amount of heterogeneous physical devices or entities. Hence, Software-defined Networks (SDN), as an emerging paradigm, has the potential to revolutionize the legacy network management and accelerate the network innovation by centralizing the control and visibility over the network. However, security issues remain a significant concern and impede SDN from being widely adopted.To identity the threats that inherent to SDN, we conducted a deep analysis in 3 dimensions to evaluate the security of the proposed architecture. In this analysis, we summarized 9security principles for the SDN controller and checked the security of the current well-known SDN controllers with those principles. We found that the SDN controllers, namely ONOS and OpenContrail, are relatively two more secure controllers according to our conducted methodology. We also found the urgent need to integrate the mechanisms such as connection verification, application-based access control, and data-to-control traffic control for securely implementing a SDN controller. In this thesis, we focus on the app-to-control threats, which could be partially mitigated by the application-based access control. As the malicious network application can be injected to the SDN controller through external APIs, i.e., RESTful APIs, or internal APIs, including OSGi bundles, Java APIs, Python APIs etc. In this thesis, we discuss how to protect the SDN controller against the malicious operations caused by the network application injection both through the external APIs and the internal APIs. We proposed a security-enhancing layer (SE-layer) to protect the interaction between the control plane and the application plane in an efficient way with the fine-grained access control, especially hardening the SDN controller against the attacks from the external APIs. This SE-layer is implemented in the RESTful-based northbound interfaces in the SDN controller and hence it is controller-independent for working with most popular controllers, such as OpenDaylight, ONOS, Floodlight, Ryu and POX, with low deployment complexity. No modifications of the source codes are required in their implementations while the overall security of the SDN controller is enhanced. Our developed prototype I, Controller SEPA, protects well the SDN controller with network application authentication, authorization, application isolation, and information shielding with negligible latency from less than 0.1% to 0.3% for protecting SDN controller against the attacks via external APIs, i.e, RESTful APIs. We developed also the SE-layer prototype II, called Controller DAC, which makes dynamic the access control. Controller DAC can detect the API abuse from the external APIs by accounting the network application operation with latency less than 0.5%. Thanks to this SE-layer, the overall security of the SDN controller is improved but with a latency of less than 0.5%. However, the SE-layer can isolate the network application to communicate the controller only through the RESTful APIs. However, the RESTful APIs is insufficient in the use cases which needs the real-time service to deliver the OpenFlow messages. Therefore, we proposed a security-enhancing architecture for securing the network application deployment through the internal APIs in SDN, with a new SDN architecture dubbed SENAD. In SENAD, we split the SDN controller in: (1) a data plane controller (DPC), and (2) an application plane controller (APC) and adopt the message bus system as the northbound interface instead of the RESTful APIs for providing the service to deliver the OpenFlow messages in real-time. (...)
Aydeger, Abdullah. "Software Defined Networking for Smart Grid Communications." FIU Digital Commons, 2016. http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/2580.
Full textAdduci, Pietro. "Software-Defined Networking: lo standard Openflow." Bachelor's thesis, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, 2014. http://amslaurea.unibo.it/7241/.
Full textNyberg, Tihmmy. "Introduktion till Software Defined Networking : Utvärdering av kontroller." Thesis, Mittuniversitetet, Institutionen för informationssystem och –teknologi, 2020. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-39380.
Full textThis study focuses on gathering information about Software Defined Networking, it's protocols ans it's controllers. What I have learned doing this will be used to evaluate two different controllers, POX and ONOS. A traditional network setup will be set up physically and serve as a base when it comes to comparing the controllers. The traditional setup includes two routers and four switches, and among the tested characteristics are layer 2 and 3 and it's redundancy protocols. The controllers will then be used to try and live up to the same characteristics. The result of this study shows that neither POX nor ONOS could be used for every scenario tested, not with the basic modules the controllers comes with. It also showed that the characteristics they did manage was a fair bit easier to setup and monitor compared to it's traditional counterparts, thus showing the importance of figuring out what is needed from a network before trying to find a fitting solution to how it needs to be set up. All the information gathered in this study is also used to create a lab instruction meant to introduce others to the concepts of SDN. It explores how to use Mininet to virtualise a network environment, how to install flows using OpenFlow and how to use a controller to simplify the management of the network.
Kim, Hyojoon. "Facilitating dynamic network control with software-defined networking." Diss., Georgia Institute of Technology, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/1853/53939.
Full textFahlén, Tony. "En jämförande studie mellan Software-Defined Networking protokollen OpenFlow & OpFlex." Thesis, Mälardalens högskola, Akademin för innovation, design och teknik, 2017. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-35565.
Full textSoftware-Defined Networking is a way to implement a fully-managed network from a central location. The goal of SDN is to be a flexible network that can quickly adapt to new configurations to handle today’s massive data streams. In order for SDN to work, a protocol is required to manage communication between the central control point and the network equipment within the network. OpenFlow is such a protocol, The OpenFlow protocol is very well established and used in many of today’s SDN networks. An alternative to OpenFlow is OpFlex, a protocol that is relatively new on today’s market, but has the support of many major manufacturers within networking and computers. The aim of this thesis is to compare these protocols both theoretically and practically through experiments in a laboratory environment to identify similarities and differences between these protocols. In order to be able to compare them, a comprehensive literature study was first conducted where information about the protocols was collected and compiled. After this, a laboratory environment was set up to test how the protocols work. After the experiments, the literature study and the laboratory results were compiled the protocols were assessed in different areas. Finally, different situations were raised where each protocol would be suitable to be chosen over the other.
Books on the topic "Softer Defined Networking (SDN)"
Italy) IEEE SDN for Future Networks and Services (2013 Trento. 2013 IEEE SDN for Future Networks and Services (SDN4FNS 2013): Trento, Italy, 11-13 November 2013. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2013.
Find full textHares, Susan. SDN Distilled: A Brief Guide to Software Defined Networking. Pearson Education, Limited, 2025.
Find full textBlokdyk, Gerardus. Software-Defined Networking SDN production A Complete Guide - 2019 Edition. 5STARCooks, 2019.
Find full textSDN and NFV Security: Security Analysis of Software-Defined Networking and Network Function Virtualization. Springer, 2018.
Find full textauthor, Szarkowicz Krzysztof Grzegorz, ed. MPLS in the SDN era: Interoperable scenarios to make networks scale to new services. 2016.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Softer Defined Networking (SDN)"
Ali, Syed Riffat. "Software Defined Networking (SDN)." In Signals and Communication Technology, 105–30. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01647-0_4.
Full textPujolle, Guy. "SDN (Software-Defined Networking)." In Software Networks, 15–48. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781119005100.ch2.
Full textZeng, Deze, Lin Gu, Shengli Pan, and Song Guo. "Software Defined Networking I: SDN." In Software Defined Systems, 57–76. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32942-6_4.
Full textHuang, Dijiang, Ankur Chowdhary, and Sandeep Pisharody. "SDN and NFV." In Software-Defined Networking and Security, 81–108. First edition. | Boca Raton, FL : CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group, 2018. | Series: Data-enabled engineering: CRC Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781351210768-4.
Full textHuang, Dijiang, Ankur Chowdhary, and Sandeep Pisharody. "SDN and NFV Security." In Software-Defined Networking and Security, 127–49. First edition. | Boca Raton, FL : CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group, 2018. | Series: Data-enabled engineering: CRC Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781351210768-6.
Full textAttili, Venkata Ramana, Sreenivasa Rao Annaluri, and V. S. Podili Srinivas. "Security Issues in SDN." In Software-Defined Networking for Future Internet Technology, 1–55. New York: Apple Academic Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781003145721-1.
Full textHuang, Dijiang, Ankur Chowdhary, and Sandeep Pisharody. "Security Policy Management in Distributed SDN Environments." In Software-Defined Networking and Security, 247–80. First edition. | Boca Raton, FL : CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group, 2018. | Series: Data-enabled engineering: CRC Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781351210768-12.
Full textApat, Hemant Kumar, Bibhudatta Sahoo, Pranitha Madapathi, and Prasenjit Maiti. "SDN-Enabled Fog Computing Architecture." In Software-Defined Networking for Future Internet Technology, 217–36. New York: Apple Academic Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781003145721-8.
Full textCugini, Filippo, Piero Castoldi, Mayur Channegowda, Ramon Casellas, Francesco Paolucci, and Alberto Castro. "Software Defined Networking (SDN) in Optical Networks." In Optical Networks, 217–44. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30174-7_9.
Full textNantoume, Adama, Benjamin Kone, Ahmed Dooguy Kora, and Boudal Niang. "Software Defined Networking (SDN) for Universal Access." In Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, 133–44. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05198-3_12.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Softer Defined Networking (SDN)"
Zhang, Zhao, Hailong Li, Siqi Dong, and Lei Hu. "Software Defined Networking (SDN) Research Review." In 2018 International Conference on Mechanical, Electronic, Control and Automation Engineering (MECAE 2018). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/mecae-18.2018.129.
Full textMahmoodi, T. "5G and Software-defined Networking (SDN)." In 5G Radio Technology Seminar. Exploring Technical Challenges in the Emerging 5G Ecosystem. Institution of Engineering and Technology, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/ic.2015.0034.
Full textKarakus, Murat, and Arjan Durresi. "Service Cost in Software Defined Networking (SDN)." In 2017 IEEE 31st International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA). IEEE, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/aina.2017.111.
Full textThangaMurugan, K. A. "Software Defined Networking (SDN) for Aeronautical communications." In 2013 IEEE/AIAA 32nd Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC). IEEE, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/dasc.2013.6719632.
Full textGelberger, Alexander, Niv Yemini, and Ran Giladi. "Performance Analysis of Software-Defined Networking (SDN)." In 2013 IEEE 21st International Symposium on Modelling, Analysis & Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems (MASCOTS). IEEE, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mascots.2013.58.
Full textAchleitner, Stefan, Thomas La Porta, Trent Jaeger, and Patrick McDaniel. "Adversarial Network Forensics in Software Defined Networking." In SOSR '17: Symposium on SDN Research. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3050220.3050223.
Full textAchleitner, Stefan, Thomas La Porta, Trent Jaeger, and Patrick McDaniel. "Adversarial Network Forensics in Software Defined Networking." In SOSR '17: Symposium on SDN Research. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3050220.3060599.
Full textShin, Seungwon, Lei Xu, Sungmin Hong, and Guofei Gu. "Enhancing Network Security through Software Defined Networking (SDN)." In 2016 25th International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN). IEEE, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icccn.2016.7568520.
Full textAziz, Normaziah A., Teddy Mantoro, M. Aiman Khairudin, and A. Faiz b. A. Murshid. "Software Defined Networking (SDN) and its Security Issues." In 2018 International Conference on Computing, Engineering, and Design (ICCED). IEEE, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icced.2018.00018.
Full textElDefrawy, Karim, and Tyler Kaczmarek. "Byzantine Fault Tolerant Software-Defined Networking (SDN) Controllers." In 2016 IEEE 40th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC). IEEE, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/compsac.2016.76.
Full textReports on the topic "Softer Defined Networking (SDN)"
Denazis, S., J. Hadi Salim, D. Meyer, and O. Koufopavlou. Software-Defined Networking (SDN): Layers and Architecture Terminology. Edited by E. Haleplidis and K. Pentikousis. RFC Editor, January 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.17487/rfc7426.
Full textBhuvaneswaran, V., A. Basil, M. Tassinari, V. Manral, and S. Banks. Terminology for Benchmarking Software-Defined Networking (SDN) Controller Performance. RFC Editor, October 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.17487/rfc8455.
Full textBhuvaneswaran, V., A. Basil, M. Tassinari, V. Manral, and S. Banks. Benchmarking Methodology for Software-Defined Networking (SDN) Controller Performance. RFC Editor, October 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.17487/rfc8456.
Full textMarin-Lopez, R., G. Lopez-Millan, and F. Pereniguez-Garcia. A YANG Data Model for IPsec Flow Protection Based on Software-Defined Networking (SDN). RFC Editor, July 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.17487/rfc9061.
Full text