Academic literature on the topic 'Software comparison'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Software comparison.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Software comparison"

1

Olyai, Alireza, and Reza Rezaei. "Analysis and Comparison of Software Product Line Frameworks." Journal of Software 10, no. 8 (August 2015): 991–1001. http://dx.doi.org/10.17706//jsw.10.8.991-1001.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Sekhar, R. Poorna Chandra, and Dr G. Anjan Babu. "Comparison of Software Cost Estimation Techniques: An Overview." International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development Volume-1, Issue-5 (August 31, 2017): 26–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.31142/ijtsrd2248.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Gupta, Sanjali. "A Comparison between Various Software Cost Estimation Models." International journal of Emerging Trends in Science and Technology 03, no. 11 (November 22, 2016): 4771–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.18535/ijetst/v3i11.08.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Kumar, Gottipalla Ashok. "Comparison Of Conventional Approach with Component Based Software Development." International Journal of Scientific Research 2, no. 2 (June 1, 2012): 141–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.15373/22778179/feb2013/47.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Beck, Fabian, and Stephan Diehl. "Visual comparison of software architectures." Information Visualization 12, no. 2 (September 17, 2012): 178–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1473871612455983.

Full text
Abstract:
Reverse engineering methods produce different descriptions of software architectures. In this article we address the task of exploring and comparing these descriptions. We present a novel visualization technique to compare architectures consisting of a decomposition of the software system and the dependencies among the code entities. This technique uses a visual representation of an adjacency matrix to provide a scalable analysis tool. Advanced layout features such as an automatic level of detail algorithm and sorting strategies improve the readability of the visualization. Using a case study, we show how this technique can be applied in practice.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Mahalakshmi, R., and R. Saranya. "Comparison of Software Requirements Tools." Research Journal of Science and Technology 9, no. 2 (2017): 272. http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/2349-2988.2017.00049.3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Gonçales, Lucian José, Kleinner Farias, Toacy Cavalcante De Oliveira, and Murilo Scholl. "Comparison of Software Design Models." ACM Computing Surveys 52, no. 3 (July 27, 2019): 1–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3313801.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Khan,et al., Ali Athar. "Comparison of Software Complexity Metrics." International Journal of Computing and Network Technology 4, no. 1 (January 1, 2016): 19–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.12785/ijcnt/040103.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Eccarius, Petra. "Comparison of major software features." Sign Transcription and Database Storage of Sign Information 4, no. 1-2 (December 31, 2001): 299–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/sll.4.1-2.21ecc.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Eccarius, Petra. "Comparison of major software features." Sign Transcription and Database Storage of Sign Information 4, no. 1-2 (December 31, 2001): 299–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/sll.4.12.21ecc.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Software comparison"

1

Shepherd, Kristen Piggott. "A Comparison of Coalescent Estimation Software." Diss., CLICK HERE for online access, 2002. http://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/ETD/image/etd145.pdf.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Hingane, Amruta Laxman. "A POT of Software Metrics: A Physiological Overturn of Technology of Software Metrics." Kent State University / OhioLINK, 2008. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=kent1227118085.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Mirpour, Sasha. "A Comparison of 3D Camera Tracking Software." Thesis, University of Gävle, Department of Mathematics, Natural and Computer Sciences, 2008. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-779.

Full text
Abstract:

In the past decade computer generated images have become widely used in the visual effects industry. One of the main reasons is being able to seamlessly blend three dimensional (3D) animation with live-action footage. In this study, different 3D camera tracking software (also referred to as matchmoving) is compared focusing on workflow, user-friendly system, and quality of production.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Weber, Matthias. "Structural Performance Comparison of Parallel Software Applications." Doctoral thesis, Saechsische Landesbibliothek- Staats- und Universitaetsbibliothek Dresden, 2016. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa-216133.

Full text
Abstract:
With rising complexity of high performance computing systems and their parallel software, performance analysis and optimization has become essential in the development of efficient applications. The comparison of performance data is a key operation required in performance analysis. An analyst may conduct different types of comparisons in order to understand the performance properties of an application. One use case is comparing performance data from multiple measurements. Typical examples for such comparisons are before/after comparisons when applying optimizations or changing code versions. Besides comparing performance between multiple runs, also comparing performance characteristics across the parallel execution streams of an application is essential to detect performance problems. This is typically useful to detect imbalances, outliers, or changing runtime behavior during the execution of an application. While such comparisons are straightforward for the aggregated data in performance profiles, only limited solutions exist for comparing event traces. Trace-based analysis, i.e., the collection of fine-grained information on individual application events with timestamps and application context, has proven to be a powerful technique. The detailed performance information included in event traces make them very suitable for performance analysis. However, this level of detail also presents a challenge because it implies a large and overwhelming amount of data. Currently, users need to perform manual comparison of event traces, which is extremely challenging and time consuming because of the large volume of detailed data and the need to correctly line up trace events. To fill the gap of missing solutions for automatic comparison of event traces, this work proposes a set of techniques that automatically align traces. The alignment allows their structural comparison and the highlighting of differences between them. A set of novel metrics provide the user with an objective measure of the differences between traces, both in terms of differences in the event stream and timing differences across events. An additional important aspect of trace-based analysis is the visualization of performance data in event timelines. This has proven to be a powerful approach for the detection of various types of performance problems. However, visualization of large numbers of event timelines quickly hits the limits of available display resolution. Likewise, identifying performance problems is challenging in the large amount of visualized performance data. To alleviate these problems this work proposes two new approaches for event timeline visualization. First, novel folding strategies for event timelines facilitate visual scalability and provide powerful overviews of performance data at the same time. Second, this work presents an effective approach that automatically identifies and highlights several types of performance critical sections in an application run. This approach identifies time dominant functions of an application and subsequently uses them to analyze runtime imbalances throughout the application run. Intuitive visualizations present the resulting runtime variations and guide the analyst to performance hot spots. Evaluations with benchmarks and real-world applications assess all introduced techniques. The effectiveness of the comparison approaches is demonstrated by showing automatically detected performance issues and structural differences between different versions of applications and across parallel execution streams. Case studies showcase the capabilities of the event timeline visualization techniques by demonstrating scalable performance data visualizations and detecting performance problems and code inefficiencies in real-world applications.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Quincey, Ed De. "Software support for comparison of media across domains." Thesis, Keele University, 2010. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.535802.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Saarnak, Stefan, and Björn Gustafsson. "A comparison of lifecycles : Agile software processes vs. projects in non-Agile software companies." Thesis, Blekinge Tekniska Högskola, Institutionen för programvaruteknik och datavetenskap, 2003. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:bth-3251.

Full text
Abstract:
In the software industry a number of different software processes has been used throughout the years to address known problems with software development, despite their intention complains has been raised that some of these are too bureaucratic. The Agile Alliance was formed in 2001 and aimed to solve this problem, they developed a manifesto and twelve principles which are supported by all Agile software processes. The purpose with the manifesto and its principles is to uncover better ways of developing software and these are by many intercessors of Agile seen as common sense and not completely new ideas. The aim with this master thesis is to answer the question if companies that explicitly claim that they do not use any Agile software process are already applying some of these ideas since they are thought of as obvious and common sense. The comparison in this thesis is performed between the project lifecycles used in specific projects by five non-Agile software companies and four identified lifecycle characteristics and two more general characteristics of the Agile software processes Extreme Programming (XP) and Dynamic Systems Development Method (DSDM). The result from the analysis of these interviews has shown that it is very difficult to decide if a software company really is working as described by XP or DSDM, this is due to that many different factors affect the final outcome. For example type of project and is the software company using different software processes for different kinds of projects. Since we just covered specific projects we were only able to conclude with absolute certainty actions that really were performed in just these projects. The project lifecycles of these software companies had some similarities with the above mentioned Agile software processes, but as a whole the analysis showed that they are quite different due to that two very important characteristics according to us, namely iterative development and frequent releases, were not applied by any of the software companies and that their project phases differed tremendously compared to XP and DSDM. Our common sense hypothesis for Agile software development was shown in this investigation to be incorrect since important activities were not performed by any of the software companies. Instead of using an iterative approach with frequent releases they all followed sequential waterfall like software processes.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Zhang, Hailing. "Comparison of Open Source License Scanning Tools." Thesis, Linnéuniversitetet, Institutionen för datavetenskap och medieteknik (DM), 2020. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-97921.

Full text
Abstract:
We aim to determine the features of four popular FOSS scanning tools, FOSSology,FOSSA, FOSSID(SCAS), and Black Duck, thereby providing references for users tochoose a proper tool for performing open-source license compliance in their projects.The sanity tests firstly verify the license detection function by using the above tools toscan the same project. We consider the number of found licenses and scanned sizes asmetrics of their accuracy. Then we generate testing samples in different programminglanguages and sizes for further comparing the scanning efficiency. The experiment datademonstrate that each tool would fit different user requirements. Thus this project couldbe considered as a definitive user guide.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Caroline, Millgårdh. "Comparing Software Libraries." Thesis, Linnéuniversitetet, Institutionen för datavetenskap (DV), 2013. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-40544.

Full text
Abstract:
When building an application, native or web-based, you can be faced with the dilemma of finding an external library that will fit your needs. This thesis investigates the problem from a commercial viability standpoint. A new Compliance Reporting System needed a chart library to create appealing dashboards and reports. The aim of the thesis was to develop a generic method for finding, comparing and testing software libraries. The method was developed making use of multiple phases which were then applied to different chart libraries for the Compliance Reporting System. The devised method did not result in the desired outcome of finding a library for the Compliance Reporting System. It did, however, contain a number of successful steps. The first set of prerequisites was used to define relevant search terms. The second set of prerequisites reduced the selection of libraries. The adaptability tests examined the APIs. It was also found that the quality of documentation and public interface of the library can influence the possibility of successful utilization. Testing the extendibility would also have been beneficial. As for chart libraries in general, a lexicon of standardized terminology would be of great benefit.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Abdelmajid, Yezeed. "Investigation and Comparison of 3D Laser Scanning Software Packages." Thesis, KTH, Geodesi och geoinformatik, 2012. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-102421.

Full text
Abstract:
Laser scanning technologies has become an important tool in many engineering projects and applications. The output of laser measuring is the point cloud, which is processed in a way that makes it suitable for different applications. Processing of point cloud data is achieved through laser scanning software packages. Depending on the field of application, these packages have many different kinds of functions and methods that can be used. The main processing tasks used on a laser scanning software package include registration, modelling and texture mapping. Investigation and comparison of two laser scanning processing packages (Leica Cyclone and InnovMetric PolyWorks) are performed in this study. The theoretical and mathematical backgrounds of the above functions are presented and discussed. The available methods and functions used by each of the packages for these tasks are addressed and discussed. By using sample data, these functions are trailed and their results are compared and analyzed. The results from registration tests show the same results on both packages for the registration using target methods. Although, the results of cloud-to-cloud registration show some deviation from target registration results, they are more close to each other in both packages than to the target registration results. This indicates the efficiency of cloud-to-cloud methods in averaging the total registration error on all used points, unlike target registration methods. The modelling tests show more differences in the accuracy of generated models between the two packages. For both fitting and surface construction methods, PolyWorks showed better results and capabilities for three-dimensional modelling. As a result, the advantages and disadvantages of each package are presented in relation with the used task and methods, and a review of data exchange abilities is presented.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Jagannathan, Srivatsan. "Comparison and Evaluation of Open-source Cloud Management Software." Thesis, KTH, Kommunikationsnät, 2012. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-99004.

Full text
Abstract:
The number of cloud management software related to a private infrastructure-as-a-service cloud is increasing day-by-day. The features of the cloud management software vary significantly and this creates a difficulty for the cloud consumers to choose the software based on their business requirements. An example of the problem is choosing software with a power management feature. The power management feature is used to increase the efficiency of energy consumption by consolidating virtual machines together and turning off unused physical servers, which is not provided by many cloud management software. OpenNebula is one of the most widely used open-source cloud management software among research institutions and enterprises. However, the performance characteristic of OpenNebula is not well studied in the existing literature. An example of the problem is choosing a hardware configuration to run OpenNebula for the research institutions and enterprises. The first objective of this thesis is to develop a framework for comparing features of various cloud management software. For developing this framework, existing works are reviewed. The cloud management software is installed on the KTH LCN testbed for hands-on experience. Both the open-source and the commercial software are analyzed for developing the framework. The major contribution related to the framework is identifying features provided for the commercial software that are not available for the open-source software. The features are: (1) co-location of VMs is running a group of VMs on the same physical machine (for example, if the web server VM has to access the application server VM for getting the web pages, they can be placed on the same physical machine); (2) anti-co-location of VMs is not allowing a pair of VMs to run on a single physical machine (for example, the primary and back-up web server VMs should always run on the different physical machines); (3) the resources of the physical machines can be combined (e.g., number of CPU cores, physical memory) as a resource pool and compartmentalized into an organizational structure (e.g., HR, development, testing, etc). The second objective of this thesis is to evaluate the performance of the OpenNebula cloud management software. For the performance evaluation, existing works are reviewed to identify the metrics, and the OpenNebula cloud management software is installed on the KTH LCN testbed. The performance of the OpenNebula software was evaluated for different virtual machine operations, virtual machine types, number of virtual machines and change in load of the system. The major lessons learned related to the performance evaluation are: (1) the duration for the live migration does not change with the load; (2) the duration for the live migration increases linearly as the memory assigned to the VM increases; (3) the duration of the add and delete operations increases linearly as the number of VMs increases.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Software comparison"

1

James, Purtilo, and Zelkowitz Marvin V. 1945-, eds. Software specification: A comparison of formal methods. Norwood, N.J: Ablex Pub. Co., 1994.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Botterbusch, Karl F. A comparison of computerized job matching systems. Menomonie, Wis: Materials Development Center, Stout Vocational Rehabilitation Institute, School of Education and Human Services, University of Wisconsin-Stout, 1986.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Gale, Julia. A comparison of U.S. and Japanese software process maturity. Pittsburgh: Research Access Inc., 1991.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Jung, Young Je. Data compression and archiving software implementation and their algorithm comparison. Monterey, Calif: Naval Postgraduate School, 1992.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Zeidman, Robert. The software IP detective's handbook: Measurement, comparison, and infringement detection. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2011.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Shimeall, Tomothy J. An empirical comparison of software fault tolerance and fault elimination. Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School, 1989.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Zeidman, Robert. The software IP detective's handbook: Measurement, comparison, and infringement detection. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2011.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Hannah, Stan A. A comparison of software methodologies in the development of a serials control system. Ann Arbor, Mich: University Microfilms International, 1994.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

O'Reilly, Brendan. The comparison of software engineering and human computer interaction approaches to system development. [s.l: The author], 1998.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Cusumano, Michael A. Hardware and software customer satisfaction in Japan: A comparison of U.S. and Japanese vendors. Cambridge, Mass: Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1988.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Software comparison"

1

Kabbedijk, Jaap, Michiel Pors, Slinger Jansen, and Sjaak Brinkkemper. "Multi-tenant Architecture Comparison." In Software Architecture, 202–9. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09970-5_18.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Ebad, Shouki A., and Moataz Ahmed. "Software Packaging Approaches —A Comparison Framework." In Software Architecture, 438–46. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23798-0_44.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Desharnais, Jean-Marc, and Pam Morris. "Comparison between FPA and FFP: a field experience." In Software Measurement, 247–64. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitätsverlag, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-08949-0_15.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Clark, Andrew, Jovan Dj Golić, and Ed Dawson. "A comparison of fast correlation attacks." In Fast Software Encryption, 145–57. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60865-6_50.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Haugen, Øystein, Birger Møller-Pedersen, and Jon Oldevik. "Comparison of System Family Modeling Approaches." In Software Product Lines, 102–12. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11554844_12.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Burke, Michael Martin, and David Nicholas Wall. "Comparison of Mnemonics for Software Diversity Assessment." In Software Fault Tolerance, 135–46. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84725-7_8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Koziolek, Heiko, Sten Grüner, and Julius Rückert. "A Comparison of MQTT Brokers for Distributed IoT Edge Computing." In Software Architecture, 352–68. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58923-3_23.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Schagaev, Igor, and Thomas Kaegi-Trachsel. "Architecture Comparison and Evaluation." In Software Design for Resilient Computer Systems, 199–205. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29465-0_15.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Schagaev, Igor, Eugene Zouev, and Kaegi Thomas. "Architecture Comparison and Evaluation." In Software Design for Resilient Computer Systems, 207–13. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21244-5_15.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Smith, David J., and John S. Edge. "Comparison of Current Standards." In Quality Procedures for Hardware and Software, 11–21. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3862-8_3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Software comparison"

1

Bildhauer, Daniel, Tassilo Horn, and Jurgen Ebert. "Similarity-driven software reuse." In 2009 ICSE Workshop on Comparison and Versioning of Software Models (CVSM). IEEE, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/cvsm.2009.5071719.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Yu, Liguo, and Srini Ramaswamy. "Software and Biological Evolvability: A Comparison Using Key Properties." In Second International IEEE Workshop on Software Evolvability. IEEE, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/software-evolvability.2006.11.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Hellman, K., S. J. Johansson, P. O. Olsson, and T. D. Dahlin. "Resistivity Inversion Software Comparison." In Near Surface Geoscience 2016 - 22nd European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics. Netherlands: EAGE Publications BV, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201602016.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Ogasawara, Eduardo, Pablo Rangel, Leonardo Murta, Claudia Werner, and Marta Mattoso. "Comparison and versioning of scientific workflows." In 2009 ICSE Workshop on Comparison and Versioning of Software Models (CVSM). IEEE, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/cvsm.2009.5071718.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

"USB label." In 2009 ICSE Workshop on Comparison and Versioning of Software Models. IEEE, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/cvsm.2009.5071700.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

"Welcome." In 2009 ICSE Workshop on Comparison and Versioning of Software Models. IEEE, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/cvsm.2009.5071701.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

"Hub page." In 2009 ICSE Workshop on Comparison and Versioning of Software Models. IEEE, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/cvsm.2009.5071702.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

"Session list." In 2009 ICSE Workshop on Comparison and Versioning of Software Models. IEEE, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/cvsm.2009.5071703.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

"Table of contents." In 2009 ICSE Workshop on Comparison and Versioning of Software Models. IEEE, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/cvsm.2009.5071704.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

"Brief author index." In 2009 ICSE Workshop on Comparison and Versioning of Software Models. IEEE, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/cvsm.2009.5071705.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Reports on the topic "Software comparison"

1

Maguire, Jeffrey B., Scott G. Horowitz, Nathan Moore, and Patrick Sullivan. Validation of Tendril TrueHome Using Software-to-Software Comparison. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), September 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1399080.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Stoermer, Christoph, Felix Bachmann, and Chris Verhoef. SACAM: The Software Architecture Comparison Analysis Method. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, December 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada443499.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Stoermer, Christopher, Felix Bachmann, and Chris Verhoef. SCAM: The Software Architecture Comparison Analysis Method. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, December 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada421661.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Ferguson, Jack R., and Michael E. DeRiso. Software Acquisition: A Comparison of DoD and Commercial Practices. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, October 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada286506.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Humphrey, Watts S., David H. Kitson, and Julia Gale. A Comparison of U.S. and Japanese Software Process Maturity. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, October 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada245035.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Horowitz, Scott, Jeff Maguire, Paulo Cesar Tabares-Velasco, Jon Winkler, and Craig Christensen. EnergyPlus and SEEM Modeling Enhancements via Software-to-Software Comparison Using NREL's BEopt Test Suite. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), August 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1295388.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Gao, David Wenzhong, Eduard Muljadi, Tian Tian, and Mackay Miller. Software Comparison for Renewable Energy Deployment in a Distribution Network. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), February 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1345057.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Bass, Len, John Bergey, Paul Clements, Paulo Merson, Ipek Ozkaya, and Raghvinder Sangwan. A Comparison of Requirements Specification Methods from a Software Architecture Perspective. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, August 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada455888.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Boyd, Thomas J., and Richard B. Coffin. Isotope Ratio Spectrometry Data Processing Software: Multivariate Statistical Methods for Hydrocarbon Source Identification and Comparison. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, April 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada422798.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Preckshot, G. G., and J. A. Scott. Comparison of ISO 9000 and recent software life cycle standards to nuclear regulatory review guidance. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), January 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/585517.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography