Academic literature on the topic 'Software protection / Law and legislation'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Software protection / Law and legislation.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Software protection / Law and legislation"
Nievienhlovskyi, Adrian. "Artificial intelligence from the perspective of polish intellectual property law. Selected issues." Theory and Practice of Intellectual Property, no. 5 (December 29, 2022): 93–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.33731/52022.270901.
Full textArmstrong, Timothy. "Symbols, Systems, and Software as Intellectual Property: Time for CONTU, Part II?" Michigan Technology Law Review, no. 24.2 (2018): 131. http://dx.doi.org/10.36645/mtlr.24.2.symbols.
Full textSuslina, Irina, and Valeriya Tarasova. "Law Protection of Computer Programs in the State of Israel." Tirosh. Jewish, Slavic & Oriental Studies 18 (2018): 206–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.31168/2658-3380.2018.18.4.2.
Full textLeonov, Borys, and Valerii Serohin. "Issues of Legal and Expert Support of Law Enforcement Activities in the Field of Cybercrime Counteraction." Information Security of the Person, Society and State, no. 27 (2019): 6–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.51369/2707-7276-2019-3-1.
Full textBelikova, Ksenia Michailovna. "The role of cryptography in ensuring cybersecurity and protecting information about technologies of strategic and advanced development in the context of protection of sci-tech achievements in the BRICS countries." Юридические исследования, no. 9 (September 2021): 22–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.25136/2409-7136.2021.9.36508.
Full textMaile, A. D. "Legislation on Administrative Procedures: The German Experience." Siberian Law Review 18, no. 2 (October 20, 2021): 204–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2021-18-2-204-215.
Full textMassacci, Fabio, Marco Prest, and Nicola Zannone. "Using a security requirements engineering methodology in practice: The compliance with the Italian data protection legislation." Computer Standards & Interfaces 27, no. 5 (June 2005): 445–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2005.01.003.
Full textRashid, Walaa Ahmed. "Constitutional Protection of Rights and Public Freedom in Light of Iraqi Constitution of 2005." Journal of AlMaarif University College 33, no. 4 (December 7, 2022): 211–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.51345/.v33i4.543.g309.
Full textSolovey, Yu P. "Modern Problems of Building the Russian Model of the Administrative Process: A Review of the All-Russian Scientific-Practical Conference." Siberian Law Review 18, no. 2 (October 20, 2021): 110–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2021-18-2-110-127.
Full textDias Canedo, Edna, Angelica Toffano Seidel Calazans, Eloisa Toffano Seidel Masson, Pedro Henrique Teixeira Costa, and Fernanda Lima. "Perceptions of ICT Practitioners Regarding Software Privacy." Entropy 22, no. 4 (April 10, 2020): 429. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e22040429.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Software protection / Law and legislation"
Karjiker, Sadulla. "Open-source software and the rationale for copyright protection of computer programs." Thesis, Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/80044.
Full textENGLISH ABSTRACT: The rationale for the legal protection of copyright works is based on the perceived need to encourage the creation of works which are considered to be socially beneficial. By awarding authors proprietary rights in their creations, copyright law allows authors the ability to earn direct financial returns from their efforts, and, thus, copyright law provides the required incentives for authors to create copyright works. Since the early days of commercial software development, copyright protection has been extended to computer programs; thus, by providing such protection it was assumed that their production should be encouraged, and that without such protection they will not be produced to the extent required by society. Comparatively recently, we have witnessed large-scale production of open-source software, which is licensed on generous terms, giving users the right to freely use, modify and redistribute such software. By adopting such licensing terms, the authors of open-source software are unable to charge licensees a fee for permission to use their software, which is the reward which copyright assumes authors seek to create such software. This development has made it necessary to re-evaluate the rationale for copyright protection of computer programs, and determine whether the continued protection of computer programs is justifiable. This study seeks to first establish a coherent theoretical justification for copyright protection, which it is submitted should be an economic justification, rather than a moral justification. The legal analysis in this work seeks to establish whether the copyright protection of computer programs is consistent with the economic justification for copyright protection. In particular, the analysis focuses on the current scope of copyright protection, and seeks to establish whether such protection is excessive, stifling creativity and innovation, and, thus, imposing too high a social cost. It is contended that copyright doctrine has generally sought to minimise these costs, and that current scope of copyright protection of computer programs leaves enough creative room for the production of new software. Despite the fact that the effect of open-source software licences is that authors are unable to earn the direct financial rewards which copyright enables authors to earn as an incentive to create such software, their authors continue to have financial incentives to create such software. Commercial firms who invest in open-source software do so because they seek to provide financially-rewarding related services in respect of software, or because it serves to promote sales in their complementary products. Similarly, the participation of individual computer programmers is largely consistent with the standard economic theories relating to labour markets and the private provision of public goods. Individuals are principally motivated by economic motives, such as career concerns. Copyright protection gives participants the choice to opt for the direct financial rewards which its proprietary protection enables, or the more indirect financial rewards of open-source software development. It is submitted within this research that rather than undermining the rationale for copyright protection of computer programs, the development of open-source software has illustrated that copyright protection allows for the emergence of alternative business models, which may be more economically advantageous to authors.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Die rasionaal agter outeursregbeskerming wat deur die reg verleen word is gebasseer op 'n behoefte om die skepping van werke wat sosiaal voordelig geag word te bevorder. Outeursreg verleen aan outeurs direkte finansiële vergoeding vir hul inspanning deur die vestiging van eiendomsreg oor hul werke. Dus, outeursreg voorsien outeurs van die nodige insentiewe om sulke werke te skep. Sedert die begindae van kommersiële sagteware ontwikkeling, is outeursregbeskerming uitgebrei om aan rekenaarprogramme sulke beskerming te bied. Deur die bied van outeursregbeskerming word daar aangeneem dat die ontwikkeling van rekenaarprogramme aangemoedig word en dat sonder die genoemde beskerming programme nie geproduseer sal word tot in 'n mate benodig deur die samelewing nie. Onlangs egter, is daar 'n grootskaalse ontwikkeling van oopbronsagteware opgemerk. Hierdie sagteware word onder ruime terme gelisensieer en gee aan gebruikers die reg om die genoemde sagteware te gebruik, te wysig en vrylik te versprei. Deur sulke terme van lisensiëring aan te neem word outeurs verhoed om vanaf lisensiehouers 'n fooi te vorder vir die toestemming om die sagteware te gebruik. Outeursreg neem aan dat hierdie vergoeding die basis vorm waarom outeurs sulke sagteware ontwikkel. Hierdie ontwikkeling maak dit nodig om die rasionaal agter outeursregbeskerming van rekenaarprogramme te her-evalueer en ook om vas te stel of die volgehoue beskerming van rekenaarprogramme regverdigbaar is. Hierdie studie poog om, eerstens, 'n samehangende teoretiese regverdiging vir outeursreg te vestig. Daar word aan die hand gedoen dat hierdie beskerming 'n ekonomiese, eerder as 'n morele regverdiging as grondslag moet hê. Die regsontleding vervat in hierdie werk poog om vas te stel of die outeursregbeskerming wat aan rekenaarprogramme verleen word in lyn is met die ekonomiese regverdiging van outeursregbeskerming. Die analise fokus in besonder op die huidige bestek van outeursregbeskerming en poog om vas te stel of sodanige beskerming oormatig is, of dit kreatiwiteit en innovasie onderdruk en derhalwe te hoë sosiale koste tot gevolg het. Daar word geargumenteer dat outeursreg in die algemeen poog om sosiale koste te verlaag en dat die huidige omvang van outeursregbeskerming van rekenaarprogramme voldoende kreatiewe ruimte vir die ontwikkeling van nuwe sagteware laat. Die effek van oopbronsagteware is dat outeurs nie in staat is om direkte finansiële vergoeding te verdien, wat as insentief gesien word vir die ontwikkeling van sagteware, nie. Ten spyte hiervan is daar steeds voldoende finansiële insentiewe om sodanige sagteware te ontwikkel. Kommersiële firmas belê in oopbronsagteware om finansiëel lonende verwante dienste ten opsigte van sagteware te voorsien. Dit kan ook dien om verkope in hul onderskeie aanvullende produkte te bevorder. Eweweens is die deelname van individuele rekenaarprogrameerders oorwegend in lyn met die standaard ekonomiese teoriëe ten opsigte van die arbeidsmark en die privaat voorsiening van openbare goedere. Individue word gemotiveer deur ekonomiese motiewe, soos byvoorbeeld oorwegings wat verband hou met hul loopbane. Outeursregbeskerming bied aan deelnemers die keuse om voordeel te trek uit die direkte finansiële vergoeding wat moontlik gemaak word deur outeursregbeskerming of uit die meer indirekte finansiële vergoeding gebied deur die ontwikkeling van oopbronsagteware. In hierdie navorsing word daar geargumenteer dat die ontwikkeling van oopbronsagteware geillustreer het dat outeursregbeskerming die onstaan van alternatiewe besigheidsmodelle toelaat wat ekonomies meer voordelig is vir outeurs in plaas daarvan dat dit die rasionaal vir die outeursregbeskerming van rekenaarprogramme ondermyn.
Everett, Christopher E. "Fundamentals of software patent protection at a university." Master's thesis, Mississippi State : Mississippi State University, 2003. http://library.msstate.edu/etd/show.asp?etd=etd-01062003-174536.
Full textForsyth, Guy, and N/A. "A minimalist sui generis legislative proposal for the application of common law principles to the protection of computer software." University of Canberra. Law, 1998. http://erl.canberra.edu.au./public/adt-AUC20090714.142532.
Full textKoutouki, Dina. "Reconsidering copyright protection for software and databases." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1999. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk1/tape9/PQDD_0015/MQ48159.pdf.
Full textChung, Kam-tong Peter, and 鍾錦棠. "China consumer protection law: panacea or placebo?" Thesis, The University of Hong Kong (Pokfulam, Hong Kong), 2005. http://hub.hku.hk/bib/B45012799.
Full textMartin, Daniel Gordon 1963. "The Archaeological Resources Protection Act, other federal legislation, and the protection of cultural resources in the United States." Thesis, The University of Arizona, 1987. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/276621.
Full textMdluli, Buyile Doris. "Online Consumer Protection: an analysis of the nature and extent of online consumer protection by South African legislation." Master's thesis, University of Cape Town, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/12894.
Full textBelevici, Stanislav. "The legal framework for investment protection in [the] Russian federation /." Thesis, McGill University, 2005. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=83946.
Full textThe first aim of this thesis is to identify the major policy issues that inform the multilateral investment protection debate and to identify the motives that have influenced Russia not to participate. The second aim is to provide an analysis of the progress that the Russian Federation has made in reforming its internal legal framework to better accommodate and protect foreign investment and identify the deficiencies that still have to be addressed.
Kyaboba, Kasobwa Léon. "La prévention des atteintes à la sécurité des consommateurs de denrées alimentaires: étude comparée des droits congolais et belge et de l'Union européenne." Doctoral thesis, Universite Libre de Bruxelles, 2001. http://hdl.handle.net/2013/ULB-DIPOT:oai:dipot.ulb.ac.be:2013/211556.
Full textStoddard, Damon. "A new Canadian intellectual property right : the protection of data submitted for marketing approval of pharmaceutical drugs." Thesis, McGill University, 2006. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=101828.
Full textOn June 17, 2006, the federal government of Canada published a proposed data protection regulation, which would provide an initial applicant with eight years of protection for clinical test results submitted in a new drug submission. This protection would lead to an eight year period of market exclusivity for the drug associated with the clinical test data, regardless of whether that drug was protected by a Canadian patent.
In this thesis, the author first describes what data protection is on a practical level, and distinguishes data protection from other forms of intellectual property rights. Next, the author discusses how various jurisdictions choose to protect clinical test data submitted to their health authorities. Canada's international obligations pursuant to the NAFTA and the TRIPS Agreement are also examined. In this regard, the author argues that Canada is under no obligation to provide initial applicants with eight years of data protection. Furthermore, the author argues that exclusive time-limited property rights in clinical test data are difficult to justify from a theoretical perspective. Finally, the author prescribes certain legislative changes to Canada's proposed data protection regulation.
Books on the topic "Software protection / Law and legislation"
1966-, Lemley Mark A., ed. Software and Internet law. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Aspen Publishers, 2003.
Find full textSamuelson, Pamela. Intellectual property protection for software. Pittsburgh, Pa: Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute, 1989.
Find full textSimon, David F. Computer law handbook: Software protection, contracts, litigation, forms. Philadelphia, Pa: American Law Institute-American Bar Association Committee on Continuing Professional Education, 1990.
Find full textXue, Hong, and Hong Xue. Software protection in China: A complete guide. Hong Kong: Sweet & Maxwell Asia, 1999.
Find full textThe software developer's and marketer's legal companion: Protect your software and your software business. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., 1993.
Find full textSoftware law: A user-friendly legal guide for software developers : with forms. Naperville, Ill: Sourcebooks, 1997.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Software protection / Law and legislation"
Hart, Robert. "Software Protection." In Information Technology & The Law, 47–69. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11768-0_4.
Full textHart, Robert. "Software Protection." In Information Technology & The Law, 53–74. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08652-8_4.
Full textBieker, Felix. "EU Data Protection Legislation." In Information Technology and Law Series, 13–46. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-503-4_2.
Full textGuo, Yimeei. "Software Copyright Protection." In Modern China’s Copyright Law and Practice, 159–77. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5352-8_8.
Full textUnni, V. K. "Software Protection Under Copyright Law." In Copyright Law in the Digital World, 185–203. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3984-3_9.
Full textBecher, Shmuel I. "Key Lessons for the Design of Consumer Protection Legislation." In Law and Economics of Regulation, 73–99. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70530-5_5.
Full textZhang, Xinbao. "Operators’ Duty of Safety Protection on Business Premises." In Legislation of Tort Liability Law in China, 283–302. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6961-1_11.
Full textHansson, U. "The Swedish Animal Protection Law — stricter than EU legislation?" In Ersatz- und Ergänzungsmethoden zu Tierversuchen, 150–61. Vienna: Springer Vienna, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-7500-2_21.
Full textLazar, Elena, and Dragos Nicolae Costescu. "Data Protection Regulations: Overview of the Romanian Legislation and Deficiencies." In Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law, 285–307. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28049-9_12.
Full textFoucher, Patricia, Anne Morin, and Agnès Chambraud. "The Importance of Community Law for French Consumer Protection Legislation." In European Consumer Policy after Maastricht, 209–23. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1484-6_11.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Software protection / Law and legislation"
Salgado, Marina. "Cultural heritage and urban protection legislation." In XXVI World Congress of Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy. Initia Via, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.17931/ivr2013_wg155_01.
Full textPasca, Ioana-Celina. "Criminal Protection of Privacy in Legislation of Romania." In The 7th International Scientific Conference of the Faculty of Law of the University of Latvia. University of Latvia, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.22364/iscflul.7.2.23.
Full textPapanikolaou, Apostolos, George Zaraphonitis, Markus Jokinen, Adrien Aubert, Stephan Harries, Jochen Marzi, George Mermiris, and Rachmat Gunawan. "Holistic Ship Design for Green Shipping." In SNAME Maritime Convention. SNAME, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.5957/smc-2022-020.
Full textGolovina, Svetlana, and Ilona Voitkovska. "Protection Against Violence in the Workplace: International Standards and Labor Legislation of Russia and Kazakhstan." In XIV European-Asian Congress "The value of law" (EAC-LAW 2020). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201205.020.
Full textКнишенко, С. Ю. "Modern trends in criminal law protection of life in Russian legislation." In XXIII Международная научная конференция «Цивилизация знаний: российские реалии» «Цивилизационные задачи современного правоведения: наука, образование, практика» (стратегическая панель). Crossref, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.18137/cz22.2022.41.52.001.
Full textСулейманова, Галия, and Galiya Sulyeymanova. "Social support for a large family: a critical analysis of the current legislation." In International legal aspects of family law and protection of children's rights. Москва: INFRA-M Academic Publishing LLC., 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/2969-337-342.
Full textАлександрова, Анна, and Anna Aleksandrova. "The rights of persons with family responsibilities in the labor legislation of foreign countries." In International legal aspects of family law and protection of children's rights. Москва: INFRA-M Academic Publishing LLC., 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/2968-328-336.
Full textБакаева, Ирина, and Irina Bakaeva. "Marriage contract in the legislation of the Russian Federation and foreign countries: problems of theoretical analysis." In International legal aspects of family law and protection of children's rights. Москва: INFRA-M Academic Publishing LLC., 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/2960-254-265.
Full textIlyin, Innokentiy, and Ruslan Ahmedov. "FORMATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF LEGISLATION ON animal protection IN PRE-REVOLUTIONARY RUSSIA." In Current problems of jurisprudence. ru: Publishing Center RIOR, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.29039/02058-6/149-154.
Full textDimitrova, Darina. "ON SOME QUESTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE LEGAL PROTECTION OF THE RIGHT TO WORK." In THE LAW AND THE BUSINESS IN THE CONTEMPORARY SOCIETY 2020. University publishing house "Science and Economics", University of Economics - Varna, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.36997/lbcs2020.254.
Full textReports on the topic "Software protection / Law and legislation"
Devereux, Stephen. Policy Pollination: A Brief History of Social Protection’s Brief History in Africa. Institute of Development Studies (IDS), December 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.19088/ids.2020.004.
Full textLEONOV, T. M., V. M. BOLSHAKOVA, and P. YU NAUMOV. THEORETICAL AND LEGAL ASPECTS OF PROVIDING MEDICAL ASSISTANCE TO EMPLOYEES OF THE MILITARY PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE. Science and Innovation Center Publishing House, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.12731/2576-9634-2021-5-4-12.
Full textEastman, Brittany. Legal Issues Facing Automated Vehicles, Facial Recognition, and Privacy Rights. SAE International, July 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4271/epr2022016.
Full text