Contents
Academic literature on the topic 'South african company act 71 of 2008'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'South african company act 71 of 2008.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "South african company act 71 of 2008"
1
Phakeng, M. "REGULATION OF MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS IN TERMS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN COMPANIES ACT 71 OF 2008: AN OVERVIEW." BRICS Law Journal 7, no. 1 (2020): 91–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2020-7-1-91-118.
Full textAbstract:
The Companies Act 71 of 2008 (the 2008 Act) replaced the Companies Act No. 61 of 1973, effective 1 May 2011. The 2008 Act was aimed at keeping pace with developments in company law internationally. It is not intended to entirely replace the well-established principles and has largely retained the pre-existing South African company law. The mergers and acquisitions provisions are aimed at creating transparent, efficient, and simple procedures. Different types of mergers and acquisitions are clearly defined as “affected transactions” or “offers” in section 117. Section 118 provides for companies to which the provisions apply. The reasons for regulating these transactions and powers of the regulator – The Takeover Regulation Panel, have been reviewed, clarified, and improved. The previous section on disposal of all or greater part of assets or undertaking of a company has been re-written. The 2008 Act further introduces a new type of affected transaction in section 113, in the form of a “merger” or an “amalgamation.” The 2008 Act has retained the scheme of arrangement in section 114, but has changed its format by removing compulsory court application and approval. The courts get involved under certain prescribed circumstances. The 2008 Act has enhanced shareholder protection for fundamental transactions in the form of section 164 – Appraisal Rights and section 115, dealing with shareholder approval of fundamental transactions. Some scholars and practitioners have criticised certain provisions. However, in general, the provisions have received favourable commentary. They regarded as progressive and comparable with others internationally.
2
Cassim, Rehana. "The Device of Weighted Votes in Blocking the Removal of Directors from Office under the South African Companies Act 71 of 2008." Journal of African Law 63, no. 2 (2019): 281–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0021855319000172.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractA director may serve a company in more than one capacity. In his capacity as a shareholder, a director may hold voting rights in the company. One consideration regarding the removal of a director from office is their removal by shareholders in circumstances where the directors are themselves shareholders in the company and hold weighted votes. This article appraises whether, under the South African Companies Act 71 of 2008, a shareholding-director who holds shares with weighted votes would validly and lawfully be able to block his removal from office by the company's shareholders. This article makes suggestions regarding the use of weighted votes to block the removal of directors from office, and calls for an important amendment to the South African Companies Act 71 of 2008 to prevent weighted votes being used as a device to block the removal of directors from office.
3
Mupangavanhu, Brighton M. "Evolving Statutory Derivative Action Principles in South Africa: The Good Faith Criterion and Other Legal Grounds." Journal of African Law 65, no. 2 (2021): 293–311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0021855321000115.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractThe recent Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) judgment in Lazarus Mbethe v United Manganese of Kalahari raises jurisprudential questions regarding statutory derivative actions in South Africa. For example, the SCA did not agree with the court a quo's ruling that the discretion to be exercised by the court is limited by provisions of section 165(5). The SCA also questioned whether it is necessary for South African courts to follow the good faith criterion in the Australian case of Swansson v Pratt as adopted into South African law through Mouritzen v Greystones Enterprises (Pty) Ltd & Another. This article contributes to these questions, and proposes possible criteria for other requirements in section 165(5)(b) of the Companies Act 71 of 2008. These other requirements are that the statutory derivative action proceedings must involve “a trial of a serious question of material consequence to a company” and that proceedings be “in the best interests of the company”.
4
Phiri, Siphethile. "Piercing the corporate veil: A critical analysis of section 20(9) of the South African Companies Act 71 of 2008." Corporate & Business Strategy Review 1, no. 1 (2020): 17–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv1i1art2.
Full textAbstract:
When a company is incorporated it becomes a juristic entity with rights and obligations of its own and is distinct from its shareholders and directors. Hence, company liabilities are not those of its shareholders and directors. However, section 20(9) of the Companies Act 71 of 2008 grants the court the discretion to disregard the corporate veil where there is an unconscionable abuse of the juristic personality so as to impose personal liability upon directors or any other person involved in that transaction. However, the section fails to define what constitutes “unconscionable abuse” which is the key to the application of that provision. This research thus seeks to discover what constitutes unconscionable abuse of the juristic personality. Simply put, this research aims to identify the circumstances under which the corporate veil may be pierced. The results from this extensive inquiry are that the term ‘unconscionable abuse’ is a legislative derivate from the various terms used by the courts at common law to justify the disregarding of the separate legal personality of the corporate entity. Therefore, the inescapable conclusion reached is that just as those terms used at common law are confounding, so shall this rather legislative innovation remain to be confounding until a specific meaning is assigned to it by the parliament.
5
Boraine, A. "Formal Debt-Relief, Rescue and Liquidation Options for External Companies in South Africa." BRICS Law Journal 7, no. 4 (2020): 85–126. http://dx.doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2020-7-4-85-126.
Full textAbstract:
This article discusses how foreign companies doing business in South Africa during periods of financial distress and registered locally as external companies are, as a recent High Court decision confirms, denied the formal debt-relief measures of business rescue and therefore a compromise with creditors because of being excluded by the definition of “company” in the Companies Act 71 of 2008. Nor, for the same reason, may these companies, if solvent, rely on the current liquidation procedures. But they may possibly use the procedure preserved in the otherwise repealed Companies Act 61 of 1973 for liquidation as far as the transitional arrangements in the Companies Act 71 of 2008 allow. The purposive solution suggested in this article for the interplay between the two Acts may need legislative attention. This article surveys other possibilities relevant to these companies such as informal voluntary arrangements, applications for winding-up, ordinary debt collection, and perhaps compulsory sequestration applications. Finally, it raises the policy issue for the legislature to consider why these companies should be denied business rescue and/or a compromise with their creditors when these formal debtrelief measures might help them survive their financial stress and emerge stronger, to the advantage of themselves, their creditors, their stakeholders and communities, and the entire nation. It is submitted that these issues could and should be considered as part of the current law reform process of South African insolvency law.
6
Subramanien, Darren. "Section 165(5)(b) of the Companies Act 71 of 2008: A discussion of the requirement of good faith." Journal of Corporate and Commercial Law & Practice, The 6, no. 2 (2020): 212–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.47348/jccl/v6/i2a8.
Full textAbstract:
In terms of s 165(5)(b) of the Companies Act 71 of 2008, ‘the court must be satisfied that the applicant is acting in good faith’; that ‘the proceedings involve the trial of a serious question of material consequence to the company’; and that it is ‘in the best interests of the company’ that the applicant(s) be granted leave. The legislature has chosen to provide guiding criteria that are vague and general rather than detailed legal steps for the exercising of judicial discretion. It would therefore be open to the courts to provide an interpretation of the words found in s 165(5)(b) especially regarding the good faith requirement. This article discusses the requirement of good faith. The interpretation and application of the good faith requirement found in s 165(5)(b) will ultimately determine the success or failure of the new statutory derivative action as an adequate remedy for aggrieved applicants who may seek redress on the company’s behalf, if the company or those in control of it improperly fail or refuse to do so. The comparable sections in the law of the United Kingdom will be evaluated in order to determine whether it is feasible to transplant selected rules and principles into South African law.
7
Nwafor, Anthony. "Protection of shareholders class rights in company law." International Journal of Law and Management 63, no. 5 (2021): 517–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijlma-11-2020-0288.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose A company that is registered with share capital may issue different classes of shares and may confer rights on members, which place them in different classes in the company’s organisational structure. This paper is concerned with the propensity for encroachment on such vested class rights as companies strive to wriggle out of business challenges spawn by the COVID-19 pandemic. The purpose of this study is to ascertain the extent of protection that the law accords to the different classes of shareholders and members in a company especially when the company seeks to vary the vested class rights. Design/methodology/approach A doctrinal methodology, which relies on existing literature, case law and statutory instruments, is adopted to explore the nature of class rights and the adequacies of the remedial measures availed by statute to the aggrieved bearers of class rights in the context of the South African Companies Act 71 of 2008 with inferences drawn from the UK companies statute and case law. Findings The findings indicate that accessing the remedies available to aggrieved shareholders under the relevant statutory provisions are fraught with conditionality, which could make them elusive to those who may seek to rely on such provisions to vindicate any encroachment on their class rights. Practical implications The paper embodies cogent information on the interpretation and application of the relevant statutory provisions geared at the protection of shareholders class rights, which should serve as guides to companies and the courts in dealing with matters that affect the vested class rights of shareholders and members of a company. Originality/value The paper shows that protections offered to classes of shareholders under the law can also be extended to classes of members who are not necessarily shareholders, and that shareholders who seek to vindicate their class rights may conveniently rely on Section 163 that provides for unfair prejudice remedy to avoid the onerous conditions under Section 164 of the South African Companies Act 71 of 2008, which directly deals with class rights.
8
Botha, Monray Marsellus. "The Different Worlds of Labour and Company Law: Truth or Myth?" Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad 17, no. 5 (2017): 2103. http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2014/v17i5a2157.
Full textAbstract:
Recently the South African company law landscape underwent a dramatic overhaul with the introduction of the Companies Act 71 of 2008. Central to company law is the promotion of corporate governance. It is clear that companies are no longer accountable just to their shareholders but also to society at large. Leaders should, for example, direct company strategies and operations with a view to achieving the triple bottom-line (economic, social and environmental performance) and should thus also manage the business in a sustainable manner. An important question in company law still today is in whose interest the company should be managed. Different stakeholders of importance to companies include shareholders, managers, employees, creditors etcetera. The Companies Act aims to balance the rights and obligations of shareholders and directors within companies, and it encourages the efficient and responsible management of companies. When considering the role of employees in corporations it must be noted that the Constitution grants every person a fundamental right to fair labour practices. Social as well as political changes were evident after South Africa's re-entering the world stage in the 1990s. Changes in socio-economic conditions within a developing country were also evident. These changes had a major influence on the South African labour law dispensation. Like company law, labour law is to a large extent also codified. Like company law, no precise definition of labour law exists. It is clear from the various definitions of labour law that it covers both the individual and collective labour law and that various role-players are involved. Some of these role-players include trade unions, employers/companies, employees, and the state. The various relationships between these parties are ultimately what will guide a certain outcome if there is a power play between them. In 1995 the South African labour market was transformed with the introduction of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995. The LRA remains the primary piece of labour legislation that governs labour law in South Africa. The notion of industrial democracy and transformation of the workplace are central issues in South African labour law. This is due to the constitutional changes that have taken place in South Africa, where the protection of human rights and the democratisation of the workplace are advanced. Before the enactment of the LRA, employee participation and voice was a much-debated topic not only locally but also internationally. It is therefore essential when considering employee participation to take due cognisance of both the labour and company law principles that may be pertinent, as well as the need for workers to have a voice in the workplace and for employers to manage their corporations. This article will attempt to indicate how the different functions, theories and models of labour and company law accommodate and promote the interests of employees in corporations and will also attempt to reconcile these differences.
9
Pillay, Dr Surendran, Dr Rajendra Rajaram, and Kajal Ramnanun. "Ascertaining the Impact of Post-Commencement Finance on Business Rescue in Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa." Journal of Social Sciences Research, no. 63 (March 24, 2020): 236–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.32861/jssr.63.236.244.
Full textAbstract:
Corporate rescue in South Africa has been bedevilled by many challenges. The new South African Companies Act 71 of 2008 (hereafter referred to as “the Act”), which came into effect in May 2011 contains a new chapter titled “Business rescue and Compromise with Creditors”. Post commencement finance (PCF) is finance or credit approved for a company in business rescue, which is regulated by section 135 of the South African Companies Act. The Act provides for companies to secure PCF as turnaround investment to secure its financial well-being. However, it is difficult for a distressed business to access PCF as it is challenging to operate on a cash basis when they face the likelihood of insolvency or forced sale of their assets to remain sustainable. This was evident during the recent global financial crises when obstacles to accessing PCF were identified as the chief deterrent for businesses that require rescue or reorganization (Pretorius and Du Preez, 2013). A review was performed to assess what the impact was, of a distress company obtaining PCF in KZN. Empirical research includes a qualitative research design engaged to explore the impact of PCF on the success of business rescue efforts for distressed companies in KZN. Insights and understandings were drawn from the participation of business rescue practitioners in Kwa Zulu Natal. This included addressing the challenges of obtaining PCF and what finance is available. The findings from the literature review confirm that the barriers to obtaining PCF are the most limiting factors in rescuing businesses in distress in KZN and the challenges include the time frame within the business rescue plan and that financial institutions are not prepared to support a business rescue without collateral.
10
Rautenbach, Christa, and Brighton M. Mupangavanhu. "Impact of the Constitution's Normative Framework on the Interpretation of Provisions of the Companies Act 71 of 2008." Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal 22 (November 6, 2019): 1–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2019/v22i0a7417.
Full textAbstract:
Given the intention of section 7(a) of the Companies Act 71 of 2008 (the Act) to promote compliance with the Bill of Rights in the interpretation and application of company law in SA, this article assesses the extent to which the Act actually does this. The article thus seeks to showcase evidence of the Act's intentional alignment with the normative framework of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 (the Constitution). The paper does this by answering the question: what are the implications of the Constitution's normative framework on the interpretation and application of the Act? The term "normative framework" is defined, and a distinction is drawn between the descriptive and explanatory social science research questions and the legal research questions which are evaluative and normative in nature. The article provides examples of the contexts in which the intentional alignment of the Act with the Constitution's normative framework is evident. To this extent, commentary is made on the following selected issues: remedies to facilitate the realisation and enjoyment of rights established by company law; the direct and indirect horizontal application of the Bill of Rights to provisions of the Act; and a discernible court's duty to develop the common law as necessary to improve the realisation of the rights established by the Act. A point is made in the article that judicial decisions involving the application of company law must be justified by reference to a cohesive set of values from the Bill of Rights. This is part of transformative constitutionalism. It demands that even commercial law principles should no longer be blindly accepted simply because precedent says so, or for the reason that it is expedient for the purposes of commercial certainty. The article argues that the Act permits the direct horizontal application of the Bill of Rights on its provisions in two stated ways. It is also argued that the Act permits the indirect application of the Bill of Rights through the development of the common law where it is deficient in promoting the spirit, purport and objects of the Bill of Rights. The development of the common law, it is argued, is vital for producing an incremental and cohesive body of constitutionalised common law in the company law context.
Dissertations / Theses on the topic "South african company act 71 of 2008"
1
Etienne, Aubrey Olivier. "Corporate capacity, special purpose vehicles, and traditional securitisation in South African company Law." University of the Western Cape, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/11394/7635.
Full textAbstract:
Doctor Legum - LLD<br>The ideals of shareholder and creditor protection are affected by legislation pertaining
to the validity of a company’s transactions. Until legislative reforms introduced in the
twentieth century, a company’s capacity and the ultra vires doctrine traditionally limited
the company’s ability to contract. Therefore, the legal framework regulating corporate
capacity influences a company’s interactions with outsiders. The goal of the law in this
regard should be to facilitate commerce while providing adequate protection to all
affected stakeholders. South Africa’s Companies Act 71 of 2008 (the Act) contains
several novel provisions regarding a company’s capacity, the desirability of which is
questionable.
Special purpose vehicles (SPVs) are used for various purposes in commerce, from
asset holding in the financial services sector to concluding complex financial functions
in corporate finance. For instance, traditional securitisation is a financial engineering
technique that makes use of corporate SPVs. Traditional securitisation is a valuable
risk management, earnings management, and corporate financing tool. Incorporators
of securitisation SPVs often include capacity restrictions in the constitutions of such
entities as a means of reducing the likelihood that the SPV will be subject to liquidation
proceedings.This thesis analyses the capacity provisions in the Act to determine
whether they provide a commercially desirable framework to facilitate the activities of
SPVs used in traditional securitisation schemes.
The thesis argues that the capacity provisions in the Act in their current form are
undesirable because they place third parties at too great a risk in exchange for
inconsistent and unreliable shareholder protection. Executory ultra vires contracts
concluded by limited capacity companies are at the same time valid and capable of
being restrained by a single shareholder, director or prescribed officer of the company.
It is argued that the Act’s approach to corporate capacity is detrimental to commercial
certainty and creditor protection, and that capacity restrictions under the current
framework do not provide any more shareholder protection than ordinary authority
limitations would. Consequently, it is argued that the capacity provisions in the Act do
not make a positive contribution to the “insolvency-remoteness” of SPVs used in
traditional securitisation schemes. It is recommended that the capacity provisions in
the Act should be substantially amended, or deleted.
2
Smit, Imogan. "The application of the business judgment rule in fundamental transactions and insolvent trading in South Africa : foreign precedents and local choices." Thesis, University of the Western Cape, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/11394/5523.
Full text
3
Havenga, Kelsey. "How comparative laws of foreign jurisdictions may be used by South African courts to find the fair value of shares when shareholders use the appraisal remedy provided for in s 164 of the South African Companies Act 71 of 2008." Master's thesis, University of Cape Town, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/19739.
Full textAbstract:
A set method of determination of the fair value of shares is omitted from s164 of the South African Companies Act 71 of 2008 (the South African Act), which deals with the appraisal remedies of dissenting shareholders. This dissertation will consider how courts in the United Kingdom and the United States have dealt with the question of what is fair value in the context of oppression remedies and appraisal rights
4
Tlhapi, Onkabetse Matlhogonolo. "Rescuing creditors from business rescue : dissecting the detrimental effects of business rescue on creditors." Diss., University of Pretoria, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/2263/75318.
Full textAbstract:
This dissertation critically analyses the business rescue regime, with a specific focus on those attributes of the regime which detrimentally affect creditors. The main aspects which will be critically analysed include, the moratorium, the effect of business rescue on suretyships and the costs of business rescue. Examples will be used to illustrate the ways in which the business rescue regime is disproportionately slanted in favour of debtor companies as opposed to their creditors. Proposals as to how the regime can be developed to balance the competing interests of debtor companies and their creditors will also be made.<br>Mini Dissertation (LLM (Corporate Law))--University of Pretoria, 2020.<br>Mercantile Law<br>LLM (Corporate Law)<br>Unrestricted
5
Kaudeer, Ashirah Bibi. "Does the role and duties of the business rescue practitioner as conferred by the South African Companies Act 71 of 2008 give rise to conflicts with respect to the powers and duties of directors during business rescue proceedings?" Master's thesis, University of Cape Town, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/20859.
Full textAbstract:
The objective of this thesis is to research to what extent do the duties and powers conferred to the business rescue practitioner conflict with that of the directors during the business rescue proceedings since both of them form part of the management of the financially distressed company. In so doing, an analysis of the South African statutory provisions will be undertaken, followed by a probe into how those provisions can lead to the probable conflicts to be encountered between management and the practitioner, which can in turn considerably affect the effectiveness and success of the corporate reorganisation. In order to be able to find solutions to reduce possible conflicts, a juxtaposed analysis will be made with similarly statutory provisions in Australia, United Kingdom and United States of America.
6
Masipa, Mayoba. "Public and non-public offers of securities in terms of the Companies Act, Act 71 of 2008." Diss., 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/2263/26631.
Full text
7
Mpofu, Kudzai. "Exploring the novel concept of business rescue under the South African Companies Act 71 of 2008." Diss., 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/11602/1065.
Full textAbstract:
LLM<br>Department of Mercantile Law<br>Business rescue provisions are meant to assist a financially distressed company. It seems that the success of business rescue rests on three factors, namely a competent business rescue practitioner and a practicable business rescue plan; the consent and cooperation of shareholders and creditors. However, academics and case law point out concerns as to the regulation of the aforementioned essential ingredients. The purpose of this study is to ascertain the level of the efficacy of the Companies Act provisions on business rescue as contained in Chapter 6. The researcher compares the current business rescue regime and the previous judicial management procedure to find out how the current regime can be improved. Since the business rescue regime was adopted from other jurisdictions the researcher also compares the practices in some of those jurisdictions with that of South Africa to establish the goals and expectations of business rescue in modern corporate operations.<br>NRF
8
Sibanda, Mandlaenkosi. "A critical appraisal of the creditor protective mechanisms under the South African Companies Act 71 of 2008." Diss., 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/11602/1365.
Full textAbstract:
LLM<br>Department of Mercantile Law<br>This research examined the mechanisms that were employed by the Companies Act 71 of 2008 in order to protect the interests of creditors in company affairs. At the preamble of the aforementioned Act lies an undertaking from legislature to provide appropriate redress to investors and third parties/creditors. It was on that basis that the researcher sought to establish whether legislature had indeed fulfilled its commitment to provide appropriate redress to creditors. Traditionally, companies have been run to promote the interests of shareholders with little attention given to the interests of other stakeholders such as creditors. It is this research`s findings that South African company law has moved from the traditional view, that is the shareholder value approach, to the enlightened shareholder value approach: a model of corporate governance which permits directors to have regard, where appropriate, to the interests of other stakeholders but with shareholders’ interests retaining primacy. It is thus found that creditors cannot be protected by contract laws alone but that their protection should be enhanced by mandatory corporate laws which regulates the manner and conduct of company controllers in a way that ensures that the interests of all stakeholders, including creditors, are given due regard. Finally, it has been found that much work has been done by legislature in developing the re-enacted creditor protective mechanisms and also in statutorily adopting new mechanisms which are aimed at advancing creditor interests. Recommendations have thus been made to legislature for possible amendments to refine its corporate laws.<br>NRF
9
Frantzen, Erinda. "The powers and authority of directors to act on behalf of a company under South African law." Diss., 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/25735.
Full textAbstract:
As a company is a juristic person it can only act through human agency. A question that arises because of this fact is under what circumstances a company can be held to a contract by a third party where its representative was unauthorised to enter into such contract. There should be a careful weighing and balancing of the interests of the shareholders and the company on the one hand and the contracting third party on the other. It is further important to have legal certainty on the validity and enforceability of contracts concluded by and with companies as the absence of certainty can hamper business dealings with companies which would have an impact on the economy.
The common-law principles of agency form the foundation upon which representation within the context of company law takes place. The law of agency has been adapted in the context of company law to satisfy the unique needs that have originated in this regard. One such adaptation is the creation of the Turquand rule by the English courts which rule was taken over by the South African courts. One of the primary reasons for creating the Turquand rule was due to the harsh effect that the common-law doctrine of constructive notice had on third parties dealing with a company.
In this study an examination of the current legal position regarding representation of a company in South Africa was undertaken. The history and development of the common-law principles of agency and doctrines that are unique to representation in a company law context are analysed and the relevant sections of the Companies Act 71 of 2008 are discussed. The integration of the common-law principles with the relevant provisions of the Companies Act 71 of 2008 is considered and recommendations are made in respect thereof.
In support of the analysis, a comparative study was undertaken of the history and development of this subject matter in England. It was concluded that South African company law, with all its shortcomings and uncertainties is still to be preferred above the position in England.<br>Aangesien ‘n maatskappy ‘n regspersoon is, kan dit slegs deur middel van natuurlike persone as agente optree. ‘n Vraag wat as gevolg van hierdie feit ontstaan is onder watter omstandighede ‘n maatskappy deur ‘n derde party gebonde gehou kan word aan ‘n kontrak waar die maatskappy se verteenwoordiger nie gemagtig was om die kontrak aan te gaan nie. Daar behoort ‘n versigtige afweging te wees tussen die belange van die maatskappy en sy aandeelhouers aan die een kant en ‘n derde party wat met die maatskappy kontrakteer aan die ander kant. Dit is verder belangrik om regsekerheid te hê oor die geldigheid en afdwingbaarheid van kontrakte wat met maatskappye aangegaan word aangesien die afwesigheid daarvan besigheidsverkeer met maatskappye kan kortwiek wat ‘n impak op die ekonomie tot gevolg sal hê.
Die gemeenregtelike beginsels van verteenwoordiging vorm die basis waarop verteenwoordiging binne die konteks van maatskappyereg plaasvind. Verteenwoordigingsreg is aangepas binne die konteks van maatskappye om voorsiening te maak vir die unieke behoeftes wat in hierdie verband ontstaan het. Een sodanige aanpassing is die skepping van die Turquand reël deur die Engelse howe, welke reël deur die Suid-Afrikaanse howe oorgeneem is. Een van die hoofredes vir die skepping van die Turquand reël is die onregverdige uitwerking wat die gemeenregtelike leerstuk van toegerekende kennis op derde partye gehad het wat met ‘n maatskappy onderhandel.
‘n Studie van die huidige regsposisie rakende verteenwoordiging van ‘n maatskappy in Suid-Afrika is hierin gedoen. Die geskiedenis en ontwikkeling van die gemeenregtelike beginsels van verteenwoordiging en leerstukke eie aan verteenwoordiging in die konteks van maatskappyereg is geanaliseer. Die betrokke artikels van die Maatskappywet 71 van 2008 word bespreek. Die integrasie van hierdie gemeenregtelike beginsels met die betrokke bepalings van die Maatskappywet 71 van 2008 is oorweeg en aanbevelings in verband daarmee gemaak.
Ter ondersteuning van die analise is ‘n vergelykende studie van die gekiedenis en ontwikkeling van hierdie onderwerp in Engeland onderneem. Daar is tot die slotsom gekom dat die Suid-Afrikaanse maatskappyereg, met al sy tekortkominge en onsekerhede nogsteeds bo die posisie in Engeland te verkies is.<br>Mercantile Law<br>LL. M.
10
Heapy, Stephanie Claire. "A company's share capital and the aquisition of its own shares : a critical comparison between the relevant provisions of the companies and act 71 of 1973 and the companies act 71 of 2008." Diss., 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/4660.
Full textAbstract:
The Companies Act 71 of 2008 (“2008 Companies Act”) will have far reaching effects on the manner in which a company is formed and operated under South African company law and in particular entrenches the procedure that must be followed by a company when acquiring its own shares. The radical amendment of the capital maintenance rules by the introduction of the solvency and liquidity tests to the Companies Act 61 of 1973 has been carried forward under the 2008 Companies Act. These tests impose an obligation on a company to ensure that the company is both solvent and liquid at the time of the acquisition of its own shares and for a stated period thereafter. The 2008 Companies Act further brings the duties and liabilities of the directors in line with their current fiduciary duties in terms of common law.<br>Mercantile Law<br>LLM