Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Speeches (Cicero, Marcus Tullius) / Journal articles

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Speeches (Cicero, Marcus Tullius).

Journal articles on the topic 'Speeches (Cicero, Marcus Tullius)'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 4 March 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Speeches (Cicero, Marcus Tullius).'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Tsyhanok, Olha, and Svitlana Vynnychuk. "Marcus tullIus Cicero’s works in the textbook on eloquence “The Mohyla Speaker” (1636)." LITERARY PROCESS: methodology, names, trends, no. 15 (2020): 95–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.28925/2412-2475.2020.15.15.

Full text

Abstract:

The article analyses which works of Marcus Tullius Cicero are mentioned and (or) quoted in the textbook on the rhetoric of the Kyiv-Mohyla Academy “Orator Mohileanus” (1636) by Joseph Kononovich-Gorbatsky. The Ukrainian teacher prefers the speeches of the Roman orator. 49 speeches of Cicero are mentioned or quoted 228 times (16 legal speeches — 148 times, 33 political speeches — 80 times).There are three cases of special attention to Cicero’s speeches: their chronology is presented; the technique of confirmation is analysed on the example of “In Defense of Archias the Poet” and common places are collected for imitation. Among Cicero’s treatises on oratory, the most popular are “Rhetorica ad Herennium” (as Joseph Kononovich-Gorbatsky means, authored by Cicero) and “About the Subdivisions of Oratory”. In total, seven rhetorical treatises are mentioned or cited 101 times. A special role is given to “About the Subdivisions of Oratory”. The structure of the first treatise clearly repeats the composition of the work of the Roman classic, the titles of the sections are duplicated, parallels are constantly drawn. Unlike other rhetorical works, Cicero’s “About the Subdivisions of Oratory” are quoted in Ukrainian rhetoric in large fragments. Six Tullius’s philosophical works are sporadically (12 times) presented in Ukrainian rhetoric; Cicero’s letters — three times only.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Andrijasevic, Marina. "Cicero’s mission of transferring Greek philosophy into Latin language and the creation of Latin philosophical terminology." Theoria, Beograd 64, no. 3 (2021): 39–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/theo2103039a.

Full text

Abstract:

Marcus Tullius Cicero is considered to be one of the greatest Roman statesmen and orators, however, this lucid creator?s philosophical writings lie in the shadow of his highly valued speeches, rhetorical writings and letters. He is widely regarded as a politician, lawyer, orator, yet few consider him a philosopher. This seems unjustified, having in mind that he received an outstanding philosophical education, wrote about numerous philosophical subjects, translated and explicated Greek authors and their philosophical doctrine. The goal of this paper is to show Cicero?s contribution to the transfer of Greek philosophy onto Latin soil, illuminate his role in the creation of Latin philosophical terminology, as well as reasons which motivated him to do so. Our subject will be presented from a linguoculturological aspect with the analysis of some of the terms, which Cicero imported into Latin philosophical vocabulary.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Kleyhons, Ferdinand. "Pons et cella penaria – Die Bedeutung Siziliens für die Entwicklung des Imperium Romanum ausgehend von Ciceros „Verrinen“." historia.scribere, no. 13 (June 22, 2021): 9. http://dx.doi.org/10.15203/historia.scribere.13.618.

Full text

Abstract:

Pons et cella penaria – The importance of Sicily for the formation of the Roman Empire on the basis of Ciceros “In Verrem”In the year 70 BCE, one of the most renowned trials in Roman history took place: The lawsuit of Gaius Verres, former propraetor of the Roman province Sicilia. Marcus Tullius Cicero, taking up the role of the claimant in this trial, wrote a series of speeches against Verres (“In Verrem”). Therein he stated, among other things, the importance of Sicily for the Roman Empire. As the first Roman province, it introduced the Romans to a new system of governing foreign territory. It functioned as a “bridge” for the conquest of Carthage and, finally, it fed the Roman population and its army. The following paper will examine each of these three steps, as well as use them as a framework to discuss the role of Sicily for the formation of the Roman Empire.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Bellemore, Jane. "The Date of Cicero's Pro Archia." Antichthon 36 (November 2002): 41–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0066477400001325.

Full text

Abstract:

The Bobiensian scholiast tells us that the speech Pro Archia was delivered by Cicero in a court presided over by his brother Quintus as praetor, who held this office in 62 B.C. The scholiast makes two clear references to Quintus (ad Pro Archia 3):(a) Archias presented this case, dealing with the Papian law on Roman citizenship, in the court of Quintus Cicero, the brother of this Marcus Tullius …(b) It is significant that he makes mention of the praetor himself, that is of his brother Quintus Cicero, who was in charge of the trial. Indeed, it is most appropriate that he speaks in praise of a fine poet in the court of someone who takes pleasure in pursuits of this kind, for Quintus Cicero was a writer not only of epic, but also of tragedy.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Renzo, Anthony Di. "His Master's Voice: Tiro and the Rise of the Roman Secretarial Class." Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 30, no. 2 (2000): 155–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/b4yd-5fp7-1w8d-v3uc.

Full text

Abstract:

The foundation for Rome's imperial bureaucracy was laid during the first century B.C., when functional and administrative writing played an increasingly dominant role in the Late Republic. During the First and Second Triumvirates, Roman society, once primarily oral, relied more and more on documentation to get its official business done. By the reign of Augustus, the orator had ceded power to the secretary, usually a slave trained as a scribe or librarian. This cultural and political transformation can be traced in the career of Marcus Tullius Tiro (94 B.C. to 4 A.D.), Cicero's confidant and amanuensis. A freedman credited with the invention of Latin shorthand (the notae Tironianae), Tiro transcribed and edited Cicero's speeches, composed, collected, and eventually published his voluminous correspondence, and organized and managed his archives and library. As his former master's fortune sank with the dying Republic, Tiro's began to rise. After Cicero's assassination, he became the orator's literary executor and biographer. His talents were always in demand under the new bureaucratic regime, and he prospered by producing popular grammars and secretarial manuals. He died a wealthy centenarian and a full Roman citizen.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

OLIVEIRA, ISADORA BUONO DE. "Marco Túlio Cícero: Possibilidades de Fontes sobre as Concepções Discursivas Religiosas Romanas no Século I a. C. * Marcus Tullius Cicero: Sources possibilities about the Roman Religious discoursive conceptions in the First-Century B.C." História e Cultura 2, no. 3 (2014): 79. http://dx.doi.org/10.18223/hiscult.v2i3.1098.

Full text

Abstract:

<p><strong>Resumo</strong>: O presente artigo visa discutir a utilização das obras de Cícero como fonte para analisar as concepções religiosas durante o período final da República. Considera-se assim, a perspectiva dos discursos filosófico-religiosos existentes juntamente com os grupos sociais relacionados às estas vertentes intelectuais. Aborda-se também, os aspectos metodológicos de trabalho com as fontes. Para o desenvolvimento desta reflexão serão utilizadas as obras:<em> De Natura Deorum, De Divinatione, De Legibus (Livro II) </em>e o discurso<em> De Domo Sua.</em></p><p>P<strong>alavras-chave: </strong>Cícero – Discurso Religioso – República.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong>Abstract:</strong> The present paper discusses the usage of Cicero’s works as a source to analyze religious conceptions during the late Republic. It is therefore considered the prospect of philosophical and religious discourses co-existing with social groups related to these intellectual strands. We also discuss the methodological aspects of working with these sources. For the development of this reflection it will be used the following works: <em>De Natura Deorum, De Divinatione, De Legibus (Book II) </em>and the speech<em> De Domo Sua.</em></p><p><strong>Keywords: </strong>Cicero – Religious Discourse – Republic.</p>

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Godfrey, Aaron W. "Marcus Tullius Cicero, How to Run a Country; Marcus Tullius Cicero, How to Grow Old; Marcus Tullius Cicero, How to Be a Friend." Forum Italicum: A Journal of Italian Studies 53, no. 3 (2019): 780–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0014585819875107.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Cape, Robert W. "M. Tullius Cicero, The Fragmentary Speeches." Rhetorica 16, no. 3 (1998): 319–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/rh.1998.16.3.319.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Nicholson, John. "Book Review: M. Tullius Cicero: The Fragmentary Speeches." American Journal of Philology 117, no. 1 (1996): 148–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/ajp.1996.0003.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Craig, Christopher P. "M. Tullius Cicero: The Fragmentary Speeches. Jane W. Crawford." Classical Philology 90, no. 4 (1995): 383–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/367485.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Mamoojee, A. H., and Jane W. Crawford. "M. Tullius Cicero: The Fragmentary Speeches, an Edition with Commentary." Phoenix 49, no. 2 (1995): 168. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1192635.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Mamoojee, A. H., and Jane W. Crawford. "M. Tullius Cicero: The Fragmentary Speeches, an Edition with Commentary." Phoenix 50, no. 2 (1996): 167. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1192704.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Protsiuk, A. "CICERO AND THE US POLITICAL CULTURE OF THE 18TH–19TH CENTURIES." Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. History, no. 139 (2018): 62–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.17721/1728-2640.2018.139.12.

Full text

Abstract:

This article covers the role of Ancient Roman statesman and intellectual Marcus Tullius Cicero in the culture of the United States of America during the 18th and 19th centuries, particularly his influence on the formation of democracy in the US. While the recent decades have witnessed the increasing scholarly attention to the impact of Cicero on the early political culture of the US, the body of historical research, especially the Ukrainian one, lacks general analyses of Cicero’s role in the American political system during the emergence of the American state and its existence on the early stages of its history. After a general overview of the historical context of Cicero’s biography and legacy, this article pays a particular attention to his impact on the creation of United States democracy. A significant number of Cicero’s ideas, more or less, had been reflected in the concepts which defined the newly created American democracy. The most important concepts in this regard are the ideas of a republic government, private property, just laws, and forms of state structure. Apart from the general importance of Cicero’s ideas for the early American democracy, Marcus Tullius Cicero himself was a notable example for some Founding Fathers of the US, especially for the 2nd President John Adams. During the 19th century, Cicero continued to play a significant role in the American society, specially in the fields of education and public speaking.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Simendic, Marko. "Cicero and hobbes on the person of the state." Filozofija i drustvo 33, no. 1 (2022): 247–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/fid2201247s.

Full text

Abstract:

The importance of Thomas Hobbes?s account of personation and representation can hardly be overstated. And his intellectual debt to one of his classical foes, Marcus Tullius Cicero, can hardly be ignored. This paper compares Hobbes?s ideas on personhood of the state with Cicero?s notion of persona civitatis, and attempts to describe how Hobbes reshaped Cicero?s guidelines for (re)presenting legitimate authority into a prop for defending any effective authority. Hobbes absorbs Cicero?s influential argument and builds on the idea of civic representation as guardianship done by role-playing, while tearing down Cicero?s account?s ethical foundations. In contrast to Cicero?s magistrate, the social role of Hobbes?s sovereign is not scripted by ethical constrains: its purpose is not to restrict license, but to present it.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Cıcero, Marcus Tullius. "Academica I. Kitap." Belleten 72, no. 264 (2008): 643–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.37879/belleten.2008.643.

Full text

Abstract:

Marcus Tullius Cicero Akademeia felsefesi ile ilgili görüşlerini üç ayrı kitapta açıklamıştır: Tanrıların Doğası (De Natura Deorum), Hortensius ve Academica. Cicero Academica'yı İ.Ö. 45 yılında ilkin Catulus ve Lucullus adıyla iki bölümden oluşan bir kitap olarak yayımlamıştır (Academica Priora). Sonra yayınladığı bu kitabı gözden geçirmiş ve dört bölümde yeniden yayımlamaya karar vermiştir (Academica Posteriora). Böylece o dönemde Cicero'nun bu çalışmasının hem ilk baskısını hem de yeniden düzenleyip yayımladığı ikinci baskısını bulmak mümkündü. Günümüze ise bu iki baskıdan (Academica Priora ve Academica Posteriora) Academica Priora'nın yalnızca ikinci, yani Lucullus adı altındaki 148 paragraflık bölümü ve Academica Posteriora'nın 46 paragraflık birinci bölümü ve fragmentler kalmıştır.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Pap, Levente. "Reticence in Cicero’s Discourse." Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica 8, no. 1 (2016): 117–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ausp-2016-0008.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract M. Tullius Cicero is one of the most prominent figures of ancient rhetoric. His rhetorical speeches are characterized first and foremost by outspokenness and offensiveness and they do not lack in temper either. Since he also dealt with rhetorical theory, Cicero was fully aware of the fact that not only the uttered words and revealed facts hold significance in a rhetorical speech but also concealment and omissions. The latter rhetorical techniques are used mainly in his ad personam attacks. An eloquent example of this is his invective against Piso which I would like to present in more detail.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Butler, Robert Olen. "Severance: Three Fictions: Marcus Tullius Cicero, and: Katheryn Howard, and: Claude Messner." Prairie Schooner 77, no. 4 (2003): 5–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/psg.2003.0111.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Prus, Robert. "Creating, Sustaining, and Contesting Definitions of Reality: Marcus Tullius Cicero as a Pragmatist Theorist and Analytic Ethnographer." Qualitative Sociology Review 6, no. 2 (2010): 3–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.6.2.01.

Full text

Abstract:

Although widely recognized for his oratorical prowess, the collection of intellectual works that Marcus Tullius Cicero (106-43 BCE) has generated on persuasive interchange is almost unknown to those in the human sciences. Building on six texts on rhetoric attributed to Cicero (Rhetorica ad Herennium, De Inventione, Topica, Brutus, De Oratore, and Orator), I claim not only that Cicero may be recognized as a pragmatist philosopher and analytic ethnographer but also that his texts have an enduring relevance to the study of human knowing and acting. More specifically, thus, Cicero's texts are pertinent to more viable conceptualizations of an array of consequential pragmatist matters. These include influence work and resistance, impression management and deception, agency and culpability, identity and emotionality, categorizations and definitions of the situation, and emergence and process.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Foley, Michael P., and Enrique Eguiarte. "Cicerón, Agustín y las raíces filosóficas de los diálogos de Casiciaco." Augustinus 54, no. 214 (2009): 315–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/augustinus200954214/21518.

Full text

Abstract:

To fully understand St. Augustine’s Cassiciacum dialogues, one must understand how they relate to the philosophical works of Marcus Tullius Cicero. Specifically, Augustine’s Contra Academicos is a response to Cicero’s Academica; and his De beata uita is a response to Cicero’s De finibus and Tusculanæ disputationes; and his De ordine is a response to Cicero’s trilogy on providence, De natura deorum, De diuinatione, and De fato. Recognizing the connection between these works sheds new light on the meaning and importance of the Cassiciacum dialogues.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Mehring, Reinhard. "Arnd Morkel: Marcus Tullius Cicero. Was wir heute noch von ihm lernen können." Philosophischer Literaturanzeiger 67, no. 2 (2014): 111–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.3196/219458451467213.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Cıcero, M. T., Ü. Fafo Telatar, Serap Gür, Turgay Erdoğan, and Cemil Koyuncu. "Post Reditum in Senatu ve Post Reditum ad Quirites Söylevleri." Belleten 74, no. 271 (2010): 871–904. http://dx.doi.org/10.37879/belleten.2010.871.

Full text

Abstract:

İ.Ö. 106-43 yılları arası yaşamış Marcus Tullius Cicero etkili konuşmaları ve devlet adamlığı yetenekleriyle İ.Ö. 63 yılında en yüksek kamu görevi olan consullüğe yükselmiştir. Cicero, bu görevde iken consullük seçimi sırasında yenilgiye uğrattığı Catilina, yandaşlarıyla birlikte düzene karşı isyan çıkarmıştır. Cicero'nun hem halkın hem de senatonun önünde yaptığı ustaca hazırlanmış coşkulu konuşmalarından etkilenen senato Catilina'nın yandaşları için idam kararı almış ve karar uygulanmıştır İ.Ö. 63 . Ama sonradan İ.Ö. 58 yılında halk tribunu Clodius'un senatoya verdiği yasa önerisiyle senato, Roma yurttaşlarının yargılanmadan idam edilmesini yasaklamıştır. Hukuksal geçerliliği kuşkulu olsa da bu yasaya göre Cicero'nun Catilina yandaşlarını idam ettirmiş olması suç sayılmıştı. Cicero, bu durumda kendini savunmadan Roma'dan uzaklaşmasının kendisi için acı da olsa Roma için daha iyi olacağını düşünmüş ve Roma'dan ayrılmıştır. Cicero'nun consullüğü sonrasındaki bu dönemde 62-57 Roma çalkantılar içindedir. Cicero'nun sürgünden sonra senatoya ve halka vermiş olduğu söylevler Post Reditum in Senatu ve Post Reditum ad Quirites bu çalkantılar hakkında bilgi verir niteliktedir.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Stepanova, Anna. "Book review: "Marcus Tullius Cicero and his contemporary education: does a scholar's paper blush?"." Hypothekai 4 (August 2020): 224–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.32880/2587-7127-2019-4-4-224-227.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Kowalski, Henryk. "Spokój czy smutek? Koncepcja starości w pismach Marka Tulliusza Cycerona." Vox Patrum 56 (December 15, 2011): 119–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.31743/vp.4211.

Full text

Abstract:

One of the great authorities in the antiquity who wrote about old age was Marcus Tullius Cicero, the author of „Cato Maior De senectute [Cato the Elder on Old Age]”. The famous orator wrote this work in 44 BCE and dedicated it to his friend Atticus. The author himself was almost 62 years old at that time, and Atticus 65. Cicero wrote the work in a dialogue form, setting the action in 150 BCE, the speakers being Marcus Porcius Cato the Elder, who in this case presented the views of Cicero, Publius Cornelius Scipio the Younger and Gaius Laelius Sapiens. Cicero followed the example of a Greek treatise on old age, probably written by a third-century BCE Peripatetic philosopher, Aristo of Ceos. The concept of the presentation of the treatise is based on comparison of two different views on old age. In one, sorrow and anxiety are visible. Through Cato’s words, Cicero names four reasons why people regard old age as an unhappy period of life: a). it moves us away from active life; b). it weakens physical strength, c). it deprives us of all sensual pleasures, d). it is close to death. The other view, represented by Cato, disproves the objections against old age, recommending calmness, activity, and moderation. Interestingly enough, apart from philosophical or medical arguments, Cicero also refers to political, religious, social and cultural aspects. The apologia for old age presented by Cicero was not always reflected in the reality. Roman sources, especially legal documents, inform about attempted suicide or euthanasia by the elderly. The fundamental reason was the condition of health and physical pain as well as mental illnesses, but the direct motive associated with old age was taedium vitae – weariness of life.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Prus, Robert. "Religion, Platonist Dialectics, and Pragmatist Analysis: Marcus Tullius Cicero’s Contributions to the Philosophy and Sociology of Divine and Human Knowing." Qualitative Sociology Review 7, no. 3 (2021): 1–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.7.3.01.

Full text

Abstract:

Whereas Socrates, Plato, Aristotle and Augustine are probably the best known of the early Western philosophers of religion, Marcus Tullius Cicero (106-43 BCE) also played a particularly consequential role in the development and continuity of Greco-Latin-European social thought. Cicero may be best known for his work on rhetoric and his involvements in the political intrigues of Rome, but Cicero’s comparative examinations of the Greco-Roman philosophies of his day merit much more attention than they have received from contemporary scholars. Cicero’s considerations of philosophy encompass much more than the theological issues considered in this statement, but, in the process of engaging Epicurean and Stoic thought from an Academician (Platonist) perspective, Cicero significantly extends the remarkable insights provided by Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle. Although especially central to the present analysis, Cicero’s On the Nature of the Gods (1972) is only one of several texts that Cicero directs to a comparative (multiparadigmatic and transhistorical) analysis of divine and human knowing. Much of Cicero’s treatment of the philosophy of religion revolves around variants of the Socratic standpoints (i.e., dialectics, theology, moralism) that characterized the philosophies of Cicero’s era (i.e., Stoicism, Epicureanism, Academician dialectics), but Cicero also engages the matters of human knowing and acting in what may be envisioned as more distinctively pragmatist sociological terms. As well, although Cicero’s materials reflect the socio-historical context in which he worked, his detailed analysis of religion represents a valuable source of comparison with present day viewpoints and practices. Likewise, a closer examination of Cicero’s texts indicates that many of the issues of divine and human knowing, with which he explicitly grapples, have maintained an enduring conceptual currency. This paper concludes with a consideration of the relevance of Cicero’s works for a contemporary pragmatist sociological (symbolic interactionist) approach to the more generic study of human knowing and acting.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Small, Michael Willoughby. "Business Practice, Ethics and the Philosophy of Morals in the Rome of Marcus Tullius Cicero." Journal of Business Ethics 115, no. 2 (2012): 341–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1401-8.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Powell, J. "Review. M. Tullius Cicero: The fragmentary speeches. An edition with commentary, 2nd edn. JW Crawford." Classical Review 47, no. 1 (1997): 50–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cr/47.1.50.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Zarecki, Jonathan. "Book review: Marcus Tullius Cicero: On the Republic and On the Laws, written by David Fott." Polis 31, no. 2 (2014): 471–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/20512996-12340033.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Altman, William H. F. "Marcus Tullius Cicero, On Duties. Translated with Introduction, Notes, and Indexes, written by Benjamin Patrick Newton." Polis: The Journal for Ancient Greek Political Thought 35, no. 1 (2018): 306–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/20512996-12340164.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Dawes, Tia. "STRATEGIES OF PERSUASION IN PHILIPPICS 10 AND 11." Classical Quarterly 64, no. 1 (2014): 241–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0009838813000682.

Full text

Abstract:

Cicero's level of success within the senate fluctuated throughout the period of his Philippic orations. These fluctuations reflect the very divisive nature of the conflict with Marcus Antonius, and the ever-changing circumstances that Cicero confronted. The orations themselves record Cicero's improvisational responses to these developments and allow us to study Cicero's range of persuasive techniques over a period of eight months, from September 44, when Cicero delivered his first Philippic, through to April 43, when he delivered his last. There has been a growing body of scholarship dealing with the Philippics, but there remains work to be done on the ad hoc nature of senatorial debate. Manuwald's recent study of praise and blame within the Philippics has provided a starting point, since she identifies strategic elements within the collection as a whole and how these elements functioned in terms of persuasion. She notes the short term use of praise and blame for the purpose of urging the senate to a particular course of action, but her avowed aims were not to isolate strategies within the speeches. And while Frisch provides full coverage of the historical context, he is less concerned with persuasive strategies within and between the speeches themselves. In this regard Philippics 10 and 11 provide an insight into the malleable and ad hoc nature of Roman oratory in the context of senatorial debate. We are able to follow Cicero's shifts in rhetorical strategies as he attempts to meet the exigencies of each situation. Philippics 10 and 11 have ostensibly similar rhetorical aims: to persuade the senate to appoint Marcus Brutus and Caius Cassius to powerful military commands in the eastern provinces, and yet the rhetorical strategies that Cicero employs differ in various ways. My aim is to examine what factors influenced his choice of strategy in the delivery of the two speeches.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Rollinger, Christian. "Rezension zu: Anja Behrendt, Mit Zitaten kommunizieren. Untersuchungen zur Zitierweise in der Korrespondenz des Marcus Tullius Cicero." Frankfurter elektronische Rundschau zur Altertumskunde, no. 23 (July 27, 2016): 55–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.21248/fera.23.98.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Lin, Richard. "Sallust’s Motivation and Cicero’s Influence in the Writing of the Bellum Catilinae." Review of European Studies 14, no. 3 (2022): 55. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/res.v14n3p55.

Full text

Abstract:

In 80 BC, at the age of 26, the future Roman statesman Marcus Tullius Cicero defended one Sextus Roscius from accusations of patricide. For Cicero, the stakes were high for challenging such a strong accusation, as patricide was seen as a horrific crime in the public eye of Rome. For one, if Cicero were to lose his defense, he would be the one to blame for Roscius&rsquo; consequential harsh punishment, Poena Cullei. Reserved only for patricide, this type of sentence involved wrapping the perpetrator&rsquo;s head in wolf skin and their beaten body sewn into a sack with live animals&mdash;namely snakes, dogs, chickens, and monkeys; only then was the body bag thrown into the water, preventing the traditional and honorable burial that most Romans had.1 Furthermore, Cicero decided to blame the murder on some men with close relations to Sulla, the dictator of the republic and an influential man easily able to silence him. Ultimately, the amateur lawyer won his first public case and used its high stakes to bring himself public recognition. Cicero acknowledges this in one of his works: Itaque prima causa publica pro Sex. Roscio dicta tantum commendationis habuit ut non ulla esset quae non digna nostro patrocinio videretur (&ldquo;My defense of Sex. Roscius, which was the first public cause I pleaded, met with such a favorable reception, that I was looked upon as an advocate of the first class, and equal to the greatest and most important causes&rdquo;).2 This fame kickstarted Cicero&rsquo;s public career, facilitated his rise to consulship in 63 BC, and foreshadowed one of the most notable events of his political career: the Catilinarian conspiracy.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Hamza, Gábor. "Nótári Tamás:Marcus Tullis Cicero összes perbeszédei(Marcus Tullius Cicero’s complete pleadings).Translated, notes and introduction by Tamás Nótári." Acta Juridica Hungarica 52, no. 4 (2011): 369–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/ajur.52.2011.4.8.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Corradetti, Claudio. "Marcus Tullius Cicero: How to Run a Country: An Ancient Guide to Modern Leaders with Introduction by Philip Freeman." Nordic Journal of Human Rights 31, no. 03 (2013): 458–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.18261/issn1891-814x-2013-03-11.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Dziuba, Agnieszka. "Military Rhetoric in the Description of Women’s Behavior on the Basis of Cicero’s and Livy’s Selected Texts." Roczniki Humanistyczne 67, no. 3 SELECTED PAPERS IN ENGLISH (2019): 23–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.18290/rh.2019.67.3-2en.

Full text

Abstract:

The Polish version of the article was published in Roczniki Humanistyczne vol. 60, issue 3 (2012). The article analyzes the original and rare Roman military phraseology found in surviving works of literature, which is part of the convention of invectives against women. As testified by the surviving fragments of the Law of the Twelve Tables, the Roman civilization divided the sphere of men’s activities (politics and war) from the sphere of women’s activities (home and family) quite early. Literature imbued with didacticism supported this division by creating archetypal figures of ideal representatives of both genders. In the course of development it worked out a stereotyped phraseology that served the purpose of describing virtutes feminae and, separately, men’s virtues, corresponding to the spheres ascribed to them. Any breach of the order established by tradition (mores maiorum) and law encountered severe reprimands, which nevertheless remained within the rhetorical convention of vituperatio. The two texts by outstanding rhetors that are analyzed here—Cato the Elder’s speech against the repeal of the Oppian law (AUC 34, 2-4) by Livy and Marcus Tullius Cicero’s speech Pro Caelio—supply examples of the use of military phraseology, usually used to describe typically male activities, in descriptions of women’s behavior. In the case of Marcus Porcius Cato’s speech, vocabulary belonging to the field of military science (agmen, expugnare, obsidere, coniuratio, seditio) serves the purpose of inducing fear in the men listening to him. In this way, by using the threat of power being seized in the republic by women, the consul motivated patres familias to act and not to yield to women. In the case of Cicero’s speech, military rhetoric was used to ridicule and embarrass Clodia Metelli as a credible witness for the prosecution in the trial of Marcus Caelius Rufus. Aggressive and at times obscene humor was supposed to divert the listeners’ attention from the defense’s lack of arguments concerning the substance of the trial. The original military phraseology used by both authors serves definite practical aims. What is more, its artistic dimension is decidedly pushed into the background. Cicero’s and Livy’s surprising idea allows us, on the one hand, to appreciate their ingeniousness in the field of rhetoric and their conscious rejection of conventions; on the other, it helps the contemporary reader of ancient texts realize the fact that men of the period of the Republic found it difficult to keep women within the limits imposed by tradition. They were forced to resort to sophisticated verbal argumentation in order to convince the judges and politicians (in both these groups patres familias prevailed) about the real threat posed by the ones in their charge.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

TSYGANOV, ROMAN. "ANTHROPOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF THE CONCEPT OF RELIGIO IN THE WORKS OF CICERO." Sociopolitical Sciences 11, no. 2 (2021): 152–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.33693/2223-0092-2021-11-2-152-158.

Full text

Abstract:

This article is devoted to the analysis of the anthropological aspects of the concept of religio used in the well-known legacy of Marcus Tullius Cicero. Cicero’s contribution to the development of philosophical understanding of various aspects of human society is generally recognized, but one of the most valuable “pearls”, which is highly valued by modern researchers, is his analysis of the Latin word religio, which is found in his works more than 600 times. In our opinion, an important aspect of Cicero’s reflections on religion is the consideration of his literary and philosophical heritage in the context of the crucial historical and political processes that took place in the Roman Republic in the first century BC, similar to the challenges facing the modern Russian and international community. The article attempts to comprehend the Latin lexemes superstitio and sacrum, which are close in meaning to the concept of religio, which allows us more accurately to explicate this concept from its related definitions. The results of the study. Cicero draws a clear line between the concepts of religio (internal and external sincere piety), sacrum (Roman state understanding of shrines) and superstitio (false beliefs). He identifies the following main functions in the concept of religio: Ideological (uniting people on the basis of pious beliefs in common gods), ideological (everything in the world happens with the permission of the gods as the foundations of the “higher order of nature”) and socio-managerial (universal values that govern the behavior of an individual in society).

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Almeida, José Luiz Gavião de, and Josias Jacintho Bittencourt. "Fraude contra credores: noção de fraude em geral. Escorço histórico e questões sobre a fraude contra credores. Ação pauliana." Revista da Faculdade de Direito, Universidade de São Paulo 115 (December 30, 2020): 63–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-8235.v115p63-91.

Full text

Abstract:

Este artigo não tem o objetivo de trazer respostas definitivas, obviamente, para a fraude contra credores, tampouco realizar estudos aprofundados sobre o vocábulo fraude – nem no Direito brasileiro, nem no Direito Comparado. Também não há a intenção de estudar a hermenêutica, a interpretação e a exegese aplicáveis. Apesar disso, alguns conceitos de fraude serão analisados, tanto no âmbito primitivo como no âmbito contemporâneo do Direito. Nuances sobre o conceito e a problemática da fraude são importantes para pensar, repensar e compreender a sua inserção na frase técnico-jurídica fraude contra credores. Nuances sobre a expressão ação pauliana, contida no título deste artigo, também são importantes para compreender os objetivos do estudo. Marcus Tullius Cicero (106-43 a.C.) articulou um interessante conceito de direitos e deveres, no contexto da fraude: “Embora o erro possa ser feito de duas maneiras, isto é, pela força ou pela fraude, ambas são bestiais; a fraude parece pertencer à raposa astuta, enquanto a força pertence ao leão. Apesar de ambas serem totalmente indignas do homem, a fraude é a mais desprezível. Isso porque, de todas as formas de injustiça, nenhuma é mais flagrante que a do hipócrita que, no exato momento em que é falso, faz questão de parecer virtuoso”. Este é o propósito, mesmo que singelo, deste artigo.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Billerbeck, Margarethe. "Philology at the Imperial Court." Greece and Rome 37, no. 2 (1990): 191–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0017383500028953.

Full text

Abstract:

In contrast to philosophy the study of language and literature always enjoyed in Rome an unqualified esteem. For experiments such as Plato undertook with Dion in Sicily a Roman would scarcely have had much sympathy. We recall too how disappointed and irritatedthe rhetorician Fronto was when his illustrious pupil Marcus Aurelius was converted to philosophy: ‘May the immortal gods forbid,’ he wrote years later to the emperor, ‘that the Comitium, the Rostra, and the tribunals, which resounded to the speeches of Cato, Gracchus, and Cicero, should fall silent in this very age of ours, that the whole world, which was eloquent when you received it, should through you lose its powers of speech!… [For if] someone should write using the language of the dialecticians, he would describe a Jupiter who sighs, or rather coughs, not one who thunders.’

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Pichugina, Victoria, Emiliano Mettini, and Yana Volkova. "Cicero’s writings as learning texts for humanities students: from Augustus Wilkins to Cicero Digitalis." Hypothekai 5 (September 2021): 191–213. http://dx.doi.org/10.32880/2587-7127-2021-5-5-191-213.

Full text

Abstract:

The heritage of the ancient Roman politician, orator and thinker Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 BC – 43 BC), is considered as a set of texts that over centuries have been included in the curricula for humanities students, significantly changing the narrative tradition and detecting a way of understanding what is related to humanities. The key questions for the authors is the following: how and for what purposes was Cicero’s heritage presented to humanities students in educational texts in the first two decades of the 20th and 21st centuries? At the beginning of last century, scholars’ attention to Cicero was largely due to Augustus Samuel Wilkins (1843–1905), Paul Monroe (1869–1947) and his disciple Ellwood Cubberley (1868-1941). Many textbooks compiled by P. Monroe, A.S. Wilkins and E. Cubberley were published one after another. Thanks to the educational books of P. Monroe, A.S. Wilkins and E. Cubberley, different approaches to presenting Cicero's works for educational purposes were developed. It is these approaches that were reflected in educational books for humanists a century later. In Russian textbooks, sourcebooks, and anthologies on history of pedagogy, Cicero was mostly a figure of omission not only in the first decades, but throughout the entire 20th century. At the beginning of the 21st century, many learning books for humanities students appeared. Their authors and compilers consider Cicero as an author who left a conceptual description of pedagogical reality (a detailed description of educational process) and chose a narrative description (description of what happened through the eyes of those who take part in it). We have to regret that the Russian domestic tradition of including Cicero's heritage in the content of humanitarian education has hardly undergone any changes over a century: fragments of his works continue to be presented on a small scale, are practically not grouped according to key issues, and rarely accompanied by pedagogical commentaries. The question of why some texts were selected while others were not, can be asked to every author and compiler who included Cicero's texts in their books for humanities students. The search for answers to this “eternal question” can be associated both with the flexibility of the humanitarian curriculum, and with the personal preferences of the authors and compilers of learning books.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Liebersohn, Yosef Z. "How to Win an Argument: An Ancient Guide to the Art of Persuasion by Marcus Tullius Cicero, Selected. edited, and Translated by James M. May." Philosophia 46, no. 1 (2017): 251–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11406-017-9929-6.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

TAVARES, ANDRÉ LUIZ CRUZ. "Aspectos da representação de Marco Túlio Cícero nos compêndios de História Universal do Ensino Secundário na Primeira República Brasileira (1889-1930) * Aspects of the representation of Marcus Tullius Cicero in textbooks on Universal History of the Second." História e Cultura 1, no. 1 (2012): 7. http://dx.doi.org/10.18223/hiscult.v1i1.553.

Full text

Abstract:

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; text-align: justify;">O artigo tem como objetivo o estudo das origens e das características da representação de Marco Túlio Cícero (106-43 a.C.) nos compêndios de História Universal utilizados no Ensino Secundário durante a Primeira República do Brasil (1888-1930), bem como a utilização dessa representação na construção identitária nacional republicana brasileira no início do século XX.</p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt;"><span><strong><span style="font-family: ">Palavras-chave:</span></strong></span><span><span style="font-family: "> Cícero – República – Brasil.</span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-family: ">Abstract:</span></strong></span><span style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: "> </span></span><span style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: " lang="EN-US">This paper aims to study the origins and characteristics of the representation of Marcus Tullius Cicero (103-46 BC) in textbooks on Universal History used in Secondary Education during the First Republic of Brazil (1889-1930), as well as use of this representation in the Brazilian republican national identity construction in early twentieth century.</span></span></p> <p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="text-align: justify;"><span><strong><span style="font-family: " lang="EN-US">Keywords:</span></strong></span><span><span style="font-family: " lang="EN-US"> Cicero – Republic – Brazil.</span></span></p>

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Levene, D. S. "C. Schäublin: Marcus Tullius Cicero, Über die Wahrsagung. De Divinatione, Lateinisch-deutsch. Herausgegeben, übersetzt und erläutert. (Sammlung Tusculanum.) Pp. 420. Munich and Zurich: Artemis and Winkler, 1991. Cased, DM 68." Classical Review 45, no. 1 (1995): 167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0009840x0029286x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Litovchenko, Sergey. "Cicero’s Proconsulship in Cilicia: The Foreign Policy Aspect." Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: History, no. 60 (December 10, 2021): 72–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.26565/2220-7929-2021-60-04.

Full text

Abstract:

The correspondence of Marcus Tullius Cicero during his term as proconsul of Cilicia provides an opportunity to better understand the complexities of governing Roman provinces during the crisis of the Republic, and above all to assess Rome’s ability to counter external threats. However, the genre of this source has strongly shaped the historiographical tradition, which has come to reflect the view of the events held by the author of most of the letters. Thus, works by modern scholars commonly justify and show full support for the proconsul’s actions. Those isolated studies that try to look critically at Cicero’s efforts during his proconsulship negatively assess the measures taken to counter the Parthian threat but identify the Roman proconsul himself as the culprit for their failure. In our view, Cicero’s correspondence allows us, at least in part, to consider the problem of the Roman provinces in the East as a whole, leaving aside the figure of one particular governor. It can be said with a high degree of confidence that the system of Roman provincial government during the late Republic did not meet the requirements of effective frontier defense in the East. The appointment of governors (proconsuls and propraetors) depended on too many random factors (as did the election of consuls and praetors) for professional managers and military men to always hold these key positions. Cicero’s example is the most striking, but obviously not unique. The elite’s focus on domestic politics automatically made foreign policy tasks secondary. Further, the governors had only limited resources, suitable for localized policing operations but inadequate even against a large-scale plunder raid, not to mention a major invasion. The allies, for many decades protecting the Roman borders with their troops and territories, now for the most part lost even the ability to control their own possessions. Traditional reliance on allied monarchs not only deprived the Romans of military support, but also led to misinformation about the situation at the border. The center’s quick response to instability on the periphery was hampered not only by slow communications, but also by the lack of a clear decision-making mechanism in Rome. Ironically, the Republic was saved by the absence of a real adversary in the East.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Gildenhard, Ingo. "QUOTATIONS IN CICERO'S LETTERS - A. Behrendt Mit Zitaten kommunizieren. Untersuchungen zur Zitierweise in der Korrespondenz des Marcus Tullius Cicero. (Litora Classica 6.) Pp. 382. Rahden/Westf.: Verlag Marie Leidorf, 2013. Paper, €49.80. ISBN: 978-3-86757-476-1." Classical Review 65, no. 2 (2015): 432–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0009840x15001043.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Hunt, Ailsa. "(P.) Freeman (trans.) Marcus Tullius Cicero: How to Think about God. An Ancient Guide for Believers and Nonbelievers. Pp. xiv + 151. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2019. Cased, £13.99, US$16.95. ISBN: 978-0-691-18365-7." Classical Review 70, no. 2 (2020): 531. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0009840x2000061x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Domingo, Rafael. "Marcus Tullius Cicero (Marcus Tullius Cicero)." SSRN Electronic Journal, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2930721.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Kiss, Zoltán. "Marcus Tullius Cicero – Válogatott vádbeszédek." Debreceni Jogi Műhely 7, no. 3 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.24169/djm/2010/3/9.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Krebs, Christopher B. "PAINTING CATILINE INTO A CORNER: FORM AND CONTENT IN CICERO'S IN CATILINAM 1.1." Classical Quarterly, December 17, 2020, 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0009838820000762.

Full text

Abstract:

Quo usque tandem abutere, Catilina, patientia nostra? (‘Just how much longer, really, Catiline, will you abuse our patience?’). The famous incipit—‘And what are you reading, Master Buddenbrook? Ah, Cicero! A difficult text, the work of a great Roman orator. Quousque tandem, Catilina. Huh-uh-hmm, yes, I've not entirely forgotten my Latin, either’— already impressed contemporaries, including some ordinarily not so readily impressed. It rings through Sallust's version of Catiline's shadowy address to his followers, when he asks regarding the injustices they suffer (Cat. 20.9): quae quousque tandem patiemini, o fortissumi uiri? (‘Just how much longer, really, will you put up with these, o bravest men?’). More playfully, and less well-known, Sallust employed the expression again in a speech by Philippus (Hist. 1.77.17 M./67 R.): uos autem, patres conscripti, quo usque cunctando rem publicam intutam patiemini et uerbis arma temptabitis? (‘But you, members of the Senate, just how much longer will you suffer our Republic to be unsafe by your hesitation and make an attempt on arms with words?’). Soon afterwards it served Cicero's son, who, as governor of Asia, put down Hybreas fils for having dared to quote from his father's work in his presence (Sen. Suas. 7.14): ‘age’, inquit [sc. Marcus Tullius], ‘non putas me didicisse patris mei: “quousque tandem abutere, Catilina, patientia nostra”?’ (‘“Come now”, he said, “do you think that I do not know by heart my father's ‘Just how much longer, really, Catiline, will you abuse our patience’?”’). Just about the same time, Livy recalled it in order to colour Manlius’ exhortation of his followers (6.18.5): quousque tandem ignorabitis uires uestras, quas natura ne beluas quidem ignorare uoluit? … audendum est aliquid uniuersis aut omnia singulis patienda. quousque me circumspectabitis? (‘Just how much longer, really, will you remain ignorant of your own strength, which nature has willed even brutes to know? … We must dare all together, or else, separately, suffer all. Just how much longer will you keep looking round for me?’). Thereafter Quintilian would refer to it twice, when discussing apostrophe and rhetorical questions (Inst. 4.1.68, 9.2.7), just a couple of years before Tacitus has the maladroit Q. Haterius encourage Tiberius to seize the reins—quo usque patieris, Caesar, non adesse caput rei publicae? (‘Just how much longer, Caesar, will you suffer the absence of the head of state?’, Ann. 1.13.4); a few decades later still, Apuleius puts it into the mouth of the slave who chastises his master, now in asinine form (Met. 3.27): ‘quo usque tandem’, inquit, ‘cantherium patiemur istum paulo ante cibariis iumentorum, nunc etiam simulacris deorum infestum?’ (‘“Just how much longer, really,” he said, “will we suffer this old gelding to attack the animals’ food just a little while ago and now even the gods’ statues?”’). He trusted, no doubt, that the famous question would alert his readers more than anything to the many ‘similarities between Catiline and Lucius’, in order to have them appreciate this ‘ludicrous copy of Cicero's arch-enemy’. Some time after, and in a different corner of the Empire altogether, a teacher's bronze statue would carry the inscription: VERBACICRO | NISQVOVSQ | TANDEMABVTE | RECATELINAPA | TIENTIANOS | TRA.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Garcia, Janete Melasso. "“A ECONOMIA DAS TROCAS LINGÜÍSTICAS”, DE PIERRE BOURDIEU E “AS CATILINÁRIAS”, DE MARCUS TULLIUS CÍCERO: REFLEXÃO SOBRE A APLICABILIDADE DE UMA TEORIA SOCIOLÓGICA A UM TEXTO LATINO." Organon 13, no. 27 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.22456/2238-8915.30433.

Full text

Abstract:

Marcus Tullius Cicero, born 106 B.C., has always been considered the greatest and mostcompetent orator that has ever lived. Pierre Bourdieu, a modern sociologist, has developed a theory aboutthe concept of broadened linguistic competence, stressing the necessary requirements for a speaker to beconsidered competent from the scientific point of view. The present article deals with the applicability ofBourdieu’s sociological theory, entitled : The Economy of Linguistic Exchanges”, to a Latin text by Cicero,with a view to confirming the pertinence of the ancient orator’s prestige.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Vanderlaan, Albert W. "Marcus Tullius Cicero: A Look into the Role of Rome's Greatest Orator During the Decline and Fall of the Roman Republic." SSRN Electronic Journal, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1347815.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Gulyás, Ábel. "Marcus Tullius Cicero: Válogatott védőbeszédek II. Fordította, jegyzetekkel ellátta és a bevezetést írta Nótári Tamás. Szeged, Lectum Kiadó, 2009. 224 oldal." Debreceni Jogi Műhely 7, no. 1 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.24169/djm/2010/1/4.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!