Academic literature on the topic 'Stanislavsky, Konstantin, Acting'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Stanislavsky, Konstantin, Acting.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Stanislavsky, Konstantin, Acting"
1
Merlin, Bella. "Which Came First: The System or ‘The Seagull’?" New Theatre Quarterly 15, no. 3 (August 1999): 218–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0266464x00013014.
Full textAbstract:
Anton Chekhov's dissatisfaction with Konstantin Stanislavsky's early productions of his plays is well known and oft-discussed. However, it may be argued that the detailed analysis to which Stanislavsky subjected the script of The Seagull, though offensive to the author's intentions, led to the germination of Stanislavsky's acting system as well as laying the foundations for the success of Chekhov's own dramatic career. Bella Merlin, Lecturer in Drama and Theatre Arts at Birmingham University, explores this avenue of debate by assessing the possible reasons for the Alexandrinsky Theatre's failure in its premiere of The Seagull in 1896. Thereafter, the mutual dependency of Chekhov and Stanislavsky is discussed with reference to the success of the Moscow Art Theatre's production of 1898. In the following article in this issue, she links these reflections on the play's early fortunes to its relevance to the ‘Method of Physical Actions’ developed by Stanislavsky towards the end of his career.
2
Whyman, Rose. "Explanations and Implications of ‘Psychophysical’ Acting." New Theatre Quarterly 32, no. 2 (April 13, 2016): 157–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0266464x16000051.
Full textAbstract:
The term ‘psychophysical’ in relation to acting and performer training is widely used by theatre scholars and practitioners. Konstantin Stanislavsky is considered to have been an innovator in developing an approach to Western acting focused on both psychology and physicality. The discourse encompasses questions of practice, of creativity and emotion, the philosophical problem of mind–body from Western and Eastern perspectives of spirituality. In this article, Rose Whyman attempts to uncover what Stanislavsky meant by his limited use of the term ‘psychophysical’ and suggests that much of the discourse remains prone to a dualist mind–body approach. Clarification of this is needed in order to further understanding of the practice of training performers. Rose Whyman is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Drama and Theatre Arts at the University of Birmingham. She researches the science of actor training and is the author of The Stanislavsky System of Acting (Cambridge, 2008) and Stanislavsky: the Basics (Routledge, 2013).
3
Silberschatz, Marc. "Creative State / Flow State: Flow Theory in Stanislavsky's Practice." New Theatre Quarterly 29, no. 1 (February 2013): 13–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0266464x1300002x.
Full textAbstract:
Nearly seventy-five years after his death, Konstantin Stanislavsky remains a toweringly influential figure, and many fundamental ideas about acting can be traced back to his practice. In this article, Marc Silberschatz examines the correspondences with, and divergences from, flow theory – the theory surrounding the psychological state associated with ‘being in the zone’ – in Stanislavsky's practice. Although separated by vast differences in social, cultural, and historical context, some significant and increasing correspondences between flow theory and Stanislavsky's practice are revealed and examined. Additionally, divergences from flow theory are identified and interrogated, suggesting that Stanislavsky's reliance on fixed, repeatable performance scores and divided consciousness are direct impediments to the achievement of flow. Marc Silberschatz is a PhD candidate at the Royal Conservatoire of Scotland. He is also a professional theatre director whose work has been seen in both the United States and Scotland.
4
Daboo, Jerri. "Konstantin Stanislavsky Michael Chekhov Vsevolod Meyerhold Jacques Lecoq." Theatre Survey 47, no. 1 (April 13, 2006): 146–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s004055740638009x.
Full textAbstract:
The Routledge Performance Practitioners series, edited by Franc Chamberlain, is a new set of introductory guides to a range of key figures in the development of twentieth-century performance practice. Each book focuses on a single practitioner, examining his or her life, historical context, key writings, and productions, and a selection of practical exercises. These concise volumes are intended to offer students an initial introduction to the practitioner and to “provide an inspiring spring-board for future study, unpacking and explaining what can initially seem daunting” (Merlin, ii). The list of practitioners in the complete series include Stanislavsky, Brecht, Boal, Lecoq, Grotowski, Anna Halprin, and Ariane Mnouchkine, thus examining a range of performance styles and practices, creating a valuable overview of the development of performer training through the twentieth and into the twenty-first centuries. Such interest in the history of specific approaches to training performers has been addressed in other volumes, such as Twentieth-Century Actor Training, edited by Alison Hodge (New York: Routledge, 2000), and Acting (Re)considered: A Theoretical and Practical Guide, edited by Phillip Zarrilli (London: Routledge 2002). Both those collections contain in-depth chapters focusing on aspects of the selected practitioners' theoretical and practical approaches to the principles and concerns in their work. Where the books in the Routledge Performance Practitioners series differ is that they offer a more general overview of the practitioner in one volume, and in addition to the historical context, they provide a set of practical exercises that can be carried out by the student or teacher, as well as by the actor or director. The books are well presented, divided into clear sections, with relevant photographs and diagrams. There are also sidebars providing definitions and further information on key figures and terms mentioned in the main text. This review covers the first four books in the series, examining the work of Konstantin Stanislavsky, Michael Chekhov, Vsevolod Meyerhold, and Jacques Lecoq.
5
White, R. Andrew. "Stanislavsky and Ramacharaka: The Influence of Yoga and Turn-of-the-Century Occultism on the System." Theatre Survey 47, no. 1 (April 13, 2006): 73–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0040557406000068.
Full textAbstract:
Fin-de-siècle Russia was a culture replete with interest in the occult, spiritualism, and the religions of the Far East. Curiosity about the mystical infused all tiers of society. Among those influenced by the spiritual was none other than Konstantin Stanislavsky himself, who experienced a personal crisis in which he began to doubt his own ability as an actor. In 1906, he took his now-famous trip to Finland, where he sequestered himself for the summer, examined his artistic life, and began to reconsider seriously his process as an actor. While reflecting on his past artistic work, he began to organize years of notes on acting; and several notions drawn from Eastern mysticism in general and Yoga in particular found their way into his “system.” Although a handful of articles that examine Stanislavsky's use of Yoga have been published in the West, over the past century scholars and teachers have paid little attention to the spiritual facets of Stanislavsky's thinking, focusing instead on the psychological aspects of his work. Given, however, the presence of important Yogic elements in the system at its very inception, a full understanding of Stanislavsky's technique is impossible without knowledge of the intersections between his system and Yoga. Borrowing from Yoga, Stanislavsky offers actors much more than theories about how to be more believable or psychologically realistic in their roles. He adapts specific Yogic exercises in order to help actors transcend the limitations of the physical senses and tap into higher levels of creative consciousness.
6
McGillivray, Glen. "“Suiting Forms to Their Conceit”: Emotion and Convention in Eighteenth-Century Tragic Acting." Theatre Survey 59, no. 2 (April 25, 2018): 169–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0040557418000054.
Full textAbstract:
When Horace wrote in Ars Poetica, “If you would have me weep, you must first feel grief yourself” (“Si vis me flere dolendum est primum ipsi tibi”), he expressed the ancient world's view that, in order to emotionally affect his audience, an orator needed to feel the emotion himself. This idea was widely subscribed to in the eighteenth century. In the modern era Konstantin Stanislavsky engaged in a sustained investigation of emotion and acting, stressing that the actor needed to experience “real feeling” in order for the audience to experience authentic emotions also. As a theory of emotional transmission, it seems like common sense. Yet, when Denis Diderot witnessed in Baron d'Holbach's salon David Garrick's parlor trick of sticking his head out between two screens, and cycling through a range of passions with his face, the great philosophe wondered whether the actor felt anything at all even though his audience, including Baron Grimm, evidently did. “Can his soul have experienced all these feelings, and played this kind of scale in concert with his face?” Diderot asked, and then answered, “I don't believe it; nor do you.” By deciding in the negative, that Garrick could not have felt anything, Diderot reveals a common fallacy of the audience: the belief that what an audience feels reflects, and is a result of, what an actor feels. The problem for Diderot, which he addressed in the Paradox of Acting (1773), was how an actor such as Garrick managed to evoke emotions in his audience when he apparently felt nothing himself.
7
Marchenko, Herman. "Vsevolod Meyerhold’s Biomechanics and Boris Zakhava's Educational Work." Scientific and analytical journal Burganov House. The space of culture 16, no. 4 (December 10, 2020): 58–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.36340/2071-6818-2020-16-4-58-74.
Full textAbstract:
The article deals with two different approaches to training actors. One of them is Stanislavski’s system, and the other is Meyerhold’s biomechanics. Konstantin Stanislavski and Vladimir Nemirovich-Danchenko are reformers of the Russian theater. As the Art Theater founders, they understood that the emergence of a new drama would require a completely different approach to working with actors and a different design of the stage space. With regard to new performances, it became possible to pose critical social questions related to everyday life before the viewer. Therefore, it was logical that the director's profession became very important. Working on his system, Stanislavski paid great attention to the need for an actor’s comprehensive development. Many wonderful actors who attended his acting school were among the students of this great theater director. Vsevolod Meyerhold was one of them. However, the latter chose his direction and began to engage in staging performances actively and search for new means of expression, having come to an absolute convention on the stage. Meyerhold created his method of working with an actor, known as biomechanics, in the theatrical environment. The principle of this approach is the opposite of Stanislavski's system. With all the difference in views on the theater, in the early stages of Meyerhold's independent practice, Konstantin Stanislavski offered him the opportunity to cooperate, which led Vsevolod Meyerhold to the Studio on Povarskaya Street in Moscow. Evgeny Vakhtangov was another student of Stanislavski and Nemirovich-Danchenko. At the request of Stanislavski, Vakhtangov was engaged in educational work in the studio of Moscow Art Theatre. Unlike Meyerhold, he thoroughly mastered the system and then created his theatrical direction called fantastic realism. Vakhtangov's legacy was preserved thanks to the activities of his students, among whom was Boris Zakhava. He turned to Meyerhold for help and spent several seasons with the master, gaining invaluable experience, including revealing the features of biomechanics in practice. Boris Zakhava remained faithful to Vakhtangov’s principles and continued his teacher’s work at the Shchukin Theater Institute.
8
Hobgood, Burnet M. "Stanislavski's Books: an Untold Story." Theatre Survey 27, no. 1-2 (November 1986): 155–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0040557400008826.
Full textAbstract:
A number of questions about Stanislavski's writings on acting and the theatre still hang in the air nearly fifty years after his death. It seems curious that this should be the case when the ideas and books by the great Russian director-actor-teacher are so well known and have exerted such a profound influence on the modern theatre. The persistence of these questions through the years has even raised doubts concerning the authenticity of the writings attributed to Stanislavski and the accuracy of translations from his original Russian texts. As a result, serious students of Stanislavski's “System” feel unable to discriminate among the current interpreters of the man born Konstantin Sergeyevich Alexeyeff.
9
Rodríguez, Bárbara Caffarel. "Del sistema de Stanislavki al método Strasberg: aproximaciones teóricas, análisis y críticas a ambos sistemas." AVANCA | CINEMA, May 9, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.37390/ac.v0i0.29.
Full textAbstract:
Konstantin Stanislavski, Russian actor and director, creator of an acting system (The System) for the Moscow Art Theater established this method to get their actors to play roles, to create characters through natural means and embody them in the stage in an artistic way. His experience as an actor and the notes of his teachers helped him to develop a manual which remains valid nowdays.Taking Stanislavski as basis, Strasberg, the American theater director of Polish origin, created what is known as the Method, the basis of the well-known Actor’s Studio. Despite being one of the most studied and effective methods, it is sometimes rejected and criticized.In this article, we propose to explain the Stanislavski system, its evolution to the Strasberg method, and the criticisms that both awaken, using a descriptive methodology, based on the investigations established by Jorge Eines or María Ósipovna Knébel, among others. The objective of this research is to create a theoretical approach that will serve for future lines of investigation of both methods and analyze and ground the criticisms of both systems.
Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Stanislavsky, Konstantin, Acting"
1
Rupsch, Stephen Joseph. "Sublime union : the pedagogy of ecstasy, an examination of the superconscious state in acting training /." view abstract or download file of text, 2005. http://wwwlib.umi.com/cr/uoregon/fullcit?p3190504.
Full textAbstract:
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Oregon, 2005.Typescript. Includes vita and abstract. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 198-203). Also available for download via the World Wide Web; free to University of Oregon users.
2
Lee, Edward D. (Edward Dale). "Using the Stanislavski System to Teach Non-Realistic Acting." Thesis, University of North Texas, 1997. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc278896/.
Full textAbstract:
This study examined Stanislavski's system as it was explained in his three books, An Actor Prepares, Building A Character, and Creating A Character. The study then examined the applicability of the Stanislavski System to the theaters of Bertolt Brecht and Absurdist theatre as represented by Harold Pinter and Samuel Beckett.
3
Scandolara, Camilo. "Os estudios do Teatro de Arte de Moscou e a formação da pedagogia teatral no seculo XX." [s.n.], 2006. http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/285042.
Full textAbstract:
Orientador: Maria Lucia Levy CandeiasDissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Artes
Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-08T08:49:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Scandolara_Camilo_M.pdf: 4509987 bytes, checksum: c903d905692b040e95b375d9e3a3a31d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006
Resumo: Este trabalho aborda a experiência dos estúdios do Teatro de Arte de Moscou (T.A.M.) como um dos pilares da formação da tradição teatral ocidental do século XX. Os estúdios do T.A.M. inserem-se em um movimento característico do processo de renovação teatral do início do século passado: o afastamento em relação aos centros da produção com o objetivo de reconstruir o ofício do ator e do diretor desde as suas bases. Partindo da constatação de que renovar o teatro implicava, antes de tudo, em criar uma pedagogia teatral sólida, Leopold Sulerjítski, Evguiêni Vakhtângov e Konstantin Stanislávski geraram espaços de experimentação nos quais a pedagogia era concebida como ato criativo, como atividade de invenção de possibilidades de teatro. Utiliza-se nesta pesquisa a análise das trajetórias de Sulerjítski e de Vakhtângov junto aos estúdios como referência para a compreensão do estabelecimento de um entendimento do fazer teatral que antecede e transcende a dimensão do espetáculo
Abstract: This dissertation approaches the experience of the Moscow Art Theatre studios, as one of the pillars of the formation of theatrical tradition in the West, in the Twentieth Century. The studios of the Moscow Art Theatre are part of a movement which characterizes the theatre renovation process of the beginning of the Twentieth Century, that is, the detachment from the main stream production, in order to re-build both acting and directing from their basis. Based on the notion that any theatre renewing would imply in the creation of a solid theatrical pedagogy, Leopold Sulerjítski, Evguiêni Vakhtângov and Konstantin Stanislávski created spaces for experimentation, in which such a pedagogy was conceived as acts of creation, as the invention of possibilities in theatre. Thus, this research presents the analysis of Sulerjítski's and Vakhtângov's trajectory in the MAT studios and offers new elements for the understanding of theatre practices which precede and transcend theatrical performances
Mestrado
Mestre em Artes
4
Otani, Daves. "Geratriz improvisacional espetacular = processo criativo da Boa Companhia =Spectacular improvisational generatrix : Boa Companhia's creative process." [s.n.], 2012. http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/284587.
Full textAbstract:
Orientador: Verônica Fabrini Machado de AlmeidaTese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Artes
Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-21T22:11:29Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Otani_Daves_D.pdf: 3263077 bytes, checksum: b6e31bdd9d62b39a46f9ea95f66b1486 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012
Resumo: A presente pesquisa trabalha com a hipótese de que existe uma geratriz improvisacional espetacular (GIE) que, por meio de matrizes criativas definidas anteriormente e/ou encontradas durante o período inicial da montagem de um espetáculo teatral, proporciona que a improvisação, conduzida e provocada pelo tema do espetáculo, gere, ao mesmo tempo, precisão e abertura, rigor e risco. O período inicial marca o espetáculo de forma a dar-lhe uma pré-configuração, a estrutura enquanto um corpo a ser constantemente modelado, no entanto, sedimentado em uma matéria já pré-definida. Para investigar a hipótese, analiso o processo criativo e as apresentações públicas do espetáculo teatral "Primus" (adaptação do conto Comunicado a uma academia, de Franz Kafka) e, via a comparação, investigo ainda o processo criativo de "Mister K. e os artistas da fome" (adaptação do conto Um artista da fome, de F. Kafka) em busca de aprofundar a investigação e comprovar o fenômeno da GIE. Ambos os espetáculos são dirigidos por Verônica Fabrini e montados pelo grupo de pesquisa cênica "Boa Companhia", do qual participo como ator, desde sua formação, em 1992. É uma investigação participativa, do ator em diálogo com a encenação, do atuante que participa e, a partir de sua singularidade, compõe coletivamente. A reflexão toma como mote de partida os princípios conceituais do encenador e teórico russo C. Stanislavski, retrabalhados por E. Kusnet: improvisação como análise ativa, circunstancia propostas, objetivo da encenação, memória, ação interior e exterior, entre outros. Referencia ainda o trabalho aspectos do pensamento do filósofo G. Bachelard: imaginação material, potência do instante e intuição. O estudo conclui que a geratriz improvisacional espetacular de fato se caracteriza no trabalho da "Boa Companhia"
Abstract: The following research deals with the hypothesis that it does exist a spectacular improvisational generatrix (SIG) that, through a creative matrix previously defined and /or discovered during the theatrical initial stage, provides that the improvisation, conducted and provoked by the show's theme, generates at the same time precision and openness, rigor and risk. The initial period defines the show and gives it a pre-configuration to be worked - the structure as a body to be constantly shaped, however, settled in a pre-defined subject. To investigate that hypothesis, I do analyze the creative processes and public theatrical performances of the show "Primus" ( Franz Kafka tale's adaptation of "A report to an academy") and, by comparation, I do analyzed too the play "Mister K. e os artistas da fome" (Kafka tale's adaptation of "A hunger artist") both directed by Veronica Fabrini and performed by the scenic research group "Boa Companhia", in which I belong as an actor since it's foundation in 1992. It's a participatory investigation, a dialogue between actor and staging, of the actor that participates and forms the collective from its singularity. The reflexion begins with the russian theoretical Constantin Stanislavski's principles and theorical concepts, reworked by Eugenio Kusnet: improvisation as active analysis, event, given circumstances, staging objective, memory, inner and outer action. This work makes reference also to the philosopher Gaston Bachelard: material imagination, instant and intuition's power. The study concludes that the spectacular improvisational generatrix (SIG) in fact exists in Boa Companhia's performances and theatrical productions
Doutorado
Artes Cenicas
Doutor em Artes
5
Facio, Robert J. "How to Tame a Shrew (11 Things I Hate About Her) An Actor's Method to Characterizing Petruchio in The Taming of the Shrew." ScholarWorks@UNO, 2014. http://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/1794.
Full textAbstract:
The Taming of the Shrew is an early comedy that exposes the oddities we take for granted: curious conventions, wild assumptions, gender roles, relationships, social status, fashion, and everything else we know so defectively. The given circumstances of the script and Petruchio are specific in choice, yet broad in interpretation. Petruchio, the catalyst behind Katherine’s character arc, needed to not only be believable in his ways, but likeable by the audience.
This thesis examines the process required to successfully develop and bring to life the character of Petruchio to our modern audience. It includes historical background information on William Shakespeare and the origins of the play itself, Sanford Meisner’s Techniques (moment-to-moment analysis & actioning) and Konstantin Stanislavski’s system are included with the scored actor’s script, journals recorded by the actor to verify his victories and defeats during the six-week production process and critiques to support the success of the production.
6
Johnson, Anthony Lewis. "Training the Young Actor: A Physical Approach." University of Akron / OhioLINK, 2009. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=akron1258075804.
Full text
7
Canalles, Pablo. "Dos princípios do ator : a análise da ação física através da tríade percepção-imaginação-adaptação, a partir dos pressupostos de Konstantin Stanislávski." Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, 2008. http://tede.udesc.br/handle/handle/1324.
Full textAbstract:
Made available in DSpace on 2016-12-08T16:52:05Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
PABLO.pdf: 753020 bytes, checksum: c44d2dd10eb4b95a1abd5b26cbbd61fd (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2008-08-25Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
The essay presented here investigates the construction of the Physical Actions according to Russian actor, director and educationalist Konstantin Stanislavski, through the perception-imagination-adaptation triad, considering that these three properties of the human being are of fundamental importance for the actor's work. The research aims to create a compilation of Stanislavski's life and work, and how he arrived at his theory of the Physical Actions, always looking for true and organic acting, having as a goal the emotion of the actor. Therefore, part of this study is a profound investigation of the laws of man in action - applied by Stanislavski and, here, correlated to each of the three properties; as well as the last great contribution of the Russian scholar to the theatrical arts: the active analysis, which encompasses the laws, the physical action and the other elements of his System. The Russian master, at the end of his studies, leaves as his legacy, the distinct idea that the physical action is only the path to creation, which gives the actor the possibility of penetrating his or her own subconscious and being moved. To Stanislavski, it is through a series of actions performed by the actor that the public can see emotion run through the scene
O trabalho aqui apresentado procura investigar como se dá a construção das ações físicas, segundo o ator, diretor e pedagogo russo Konstantin Stanislávski, através da tríade percepção-imaginação-adaptação, tendo em vista que essas três faculdades do ser humano são de fundamental importância para o trabalho do ator. A pesquisa visa a fazer um apanhado geral sobre a vida e a obra de Stanislávski, e como ele chegou à questão da ação física, buscando sempre uma atuação verdadeira e orgânica, tendo como fim a emoção do ator. Nesse sentido, fazem parte do trabalho uma investigação aprofundada sobre as leis do homem em ação - postuladas por Stanislávski e, aqui, relacionadas a cada uma das três faculdades - e a última grande contribuição do pesquisador russo à arte teatral: a análise ativa, que engloba as leis, a ação física e os demias elementos do Sistema. O mestre russo, ao fim de seus estudos, lega-nos a primorosa idéia de que a ação física é apenas um meio para a criação, que possibilita ao ator penetrar no seu próprio subconsciente e emocionar-se. Para Stanislávski, é através de uma série de ações realizadas pelo ator que o público pode ver a emoção percorrendo a cena
8
Trevisan, Maria Christina Achutti [UNESP]. "Stanislávski-Laban: do texto à encenação." Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/86878.
Full textAbstract:
Made available in DSpace on 2014-06-11T19:22:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0
Previous issue date: 2009-08-14Bitstream added on 2014-06-13T19:07:55Z : No. of bitstreams: 1
trevisan_mca_me_ia.pdf: 885979 bytes, checksum: 66089eeec0f88c3c04ec404289460eb7 (MD5)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Esta pesquisa apresenta um caminho de encenar um texto teatral a partir da ação dramática de cada cena, utilizando a análise de texto e a movimentação corporal do ator como estímulos de criação, articulando, ao longo do percurso, esses dois elementos. Desenvolvemos esse trabalho fundamentados pelos estudos de Constantin Stanislávski e Rudolf Laban. Em um primeiro momento, aprofundamos nosso conhecimento sobre os dois autores e recortamos dos seus sistemas o que era pertinente a nossa proposta, isto é, os elementos que poderiam influenciar no tratamento da ação dramática. Em um segundo momento, aplicamos esses conteúdos na encenação do texto teatral O Provedor, de Marcos Benedito de Oliveira. No caminho que percorremos do texto a sua representação, confirmamos a hipótese formulada: a análise de texto segundo Stanislávski pode identificar e resumir as ações dramáticas de cada cena; por sua vez, o movimento corporal do ator preparado por meio do Sistema Laban pode executar essas ações expressivamente, estabelecendo-se, a partir do momento em que começamos a levantar o espetáculo, um diálogo dinâmico e constante entre esses dois elementos. Os resumos das ações dramáticas constituíram-se nas nossas células matrizes de criação, e a encenação foi construída e elaborada a partir deles...
This research presents a way of acting a theatrical text starting from the dramatic action in each scene, using the text analysis and the actor’s body movement as creation incentive, joining, along the movement, these two elements together. We developed this job based on Constantin Stanislávski and Rudolf Laban’s studies. In the first moment, we went deeper into our knowledge about these two authors and we took from their systems what was pertinent to our proposal, that is to say, the elements that could have influence in the treatment of the dramatic action. In the second moment, we applied these contents in the staging of the theatrical text O Provedor, of Marcos Benedito de Oliveira. From the text to the performance, we confirmed the formulated hypothesis: the text analysis according to Stanislávski can identify and summarize the dramatic actions of each scene; on the other hand, the actor’s body movement prepared by the Laban’s System can accomplish these actions meaningfully, establishing, since we started to build the show, a constant and dynamic dialog between these two elements. The summaries of the dramatic actions were formed in our creation mother cells, and the staging was built and elaborated from them. In this way, we highligt the relation between the stage score generated by the study of the text and the body movement, one supplementing and transforming the other... (Complete abstract click electronic access below)
9
Steiger, Amy Lynn. "Actors as embodied public intellectuals: reanimating consciousness, community and activism through oral history interviewing and solo performance in an intertextual method of actor training." Thesis, 2006. http://hdl.handle.net/2152/3502.
Full textBooks on the topic "Stanislavsky, Konstantin, Acting"
3
Pitches, Jonathan. Science and the Stanislavsky tradition of acting. London: Routledge, 2006.
Find full text
6
Whyman, Rose. The Stanislavsky system of acting: Legacy and influence in modern performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
Find full text
7
Parke, Lawrence. Since Stanislavski and Vakhtangov: The method as a system for today's actor. Hollywood: Acting World Books, 1986.
Find full text
9
Carnicke, Sharon Marie. Stanislavsky in focus: An acting master for the 21st century. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Routledge, 2008.
Find full text
10
Stanislavsky in practice: Actor training in post-Soviet Russia. New York: P. Lang, 2008.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Stanislavsky, Konstantin, Acting"
1
Grobe, Christopher. "The Breath of a Poem." In Art of Confession. NYU Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479829170.003.0003.
Full textAbstract:
Today, we may know confessional poetry as a set of texts that are printed in books, but in its time it was also a performance genre. This chapter demonstrates how the performance of poems—in the privacy of the poet’s study, at public poetry readings, and in the studios of recorded literature companies—shaped this genre, determined its tactics, and influenced its style. An extended comparison of Robert Lowell and Allen Ginsberg shows that breath was a key medium for confessional poets, and a study of Anne Sexton’s career—both on the page and at the podium—shows how she “breathed back” dead poems in live performance. Throughout, this chapter focuses on the feelings of embarrassment confessional poetry raised, and the uses to which poets could put such feelings. It also highlights contemporary trends in “performance” and their impact on confessional poets—e.g., Anne Sexton’s debt to the acting theories of Konstantin Stanislavsky and to Method acting as theorized by American director Lee Strasberg.