Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Steinthal / Journal articles

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Steinthal.

Journal articles on the topic 'Steinthal'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 3 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Steinthal.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Di Cesare, Donatella. "‘Innere Sprachform’ Humboldts Grenzbegriff, Steinthals Begriffsgrenze." Historiographia Linguistica 23, no. 3 (1996): 321–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/hl.23.3.05dic.

Full text

Abstract:

Zusammenfassung Der vorliegende Aufsatz untersucht die Frage nach dem besonderen Beitrag Heymann Steinthals (1823–1899) zur Interpretation der Sprachauffassung Wilhelm von Humboldts (1767–1835). Er argumentiert, daß bei seinem fast lebenslänglichen Bemuhen, den wirklichen hinter dem idealen, ‘mystischen’ und genialen Humboldt zu erhellen, Steinthal den Versuch untemimmt, Humboldts Gegensatz zwischen Empirie und Theorie zu iiberwinden. Dies soil auf dem nach seiner Begegnung mit Moritz Lazarus (1824–1903) eingeschlagenen sprachpsychologischen Weg geschehen. Humboldts ‘mystischer Dualismus’ – für Steinthal ein Überrest der kantischen Philosophic – wird aber einfach durch einen herbartisierten Hegelismus ersetzt: In seinem Versuch, Humboldt dialektisch zu vollenden, seinen Dualismus dadurch aufzulösen, daß er die Empirie gegenüber der Theorie die Oberhand gewinnen läßt, um Humboldt einen guten empirischen Schritt weiterzubringen, fällt Steinthal im Endergebnis einen ganzen metaphyischen Schritt zurück, indem er das trennt, was Humboldt zusammenhält, und dabei zu einem substantiellen Dualismus zwischen Außerem und Innerem, ja zu einem Vorrang des Inneren, Geistlichen vor dem Außeren, Sinnlichen gelangt. Hauptpunkt der unuberbrückbaren Distanz zwischen Steinthal und Humboldt ist der Begriff der ‘inneren Sprachform’. Während die ‘innere Sprachform’ bei Humboldt einen Grenzbegriff darstellt, so erweist sie sich paradoxerweise bei Steinthal als eine Begriffsgrenze, die letzlich der Grenze seines Psychologismus gleichkommt.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Mukai, Naoki. "H. Steinthal: A Psychologist of the Jewish People." European Journal of Jewish Studies 6, no. 2 (2012): 275–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1872471x-12341237.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract This paper deals with the concept of Judaism by H. Steinthal (1823–1899), a renowned linguist in nineteenth-century Germany and a lecturer at the Hochschule für Wissenschaft des Judentums. The first part (sections 1–3) outlines his early education and scholarly development with regard to Völkerpsychologie, which strives to clarify the mental characteristics of peoples in the richness and pletitude of their diversity. Through his intensive study of the works by Wilhelm von Humboldt, Steinthal constructed his own theory of linguistics, which would play a crucial role in that socio-psychological study of the culture represented by the discipline of Völkerpsychologie. The second part (sections 4–6) discusses in the main Steinthal’s commitment to Judaism in regard to personal, public and cultural aspects. Throughout this part of the paper, the role of emotional elements within his concept of Judaism is emphasized. As Dieter Adelman has pointed out, the notion of devotion (Andacht) constitutes the crux of his view on religious practice, even if Steinthal offered a quite rational (and almost atheistic) concept of religion, inclusive of Judaism. Section 6 explores Steinthal’s treatise on Deuteronomy (Das fünfte Buch Mose/Die erzählende Stücke im fünften Buch Mose) as a work of Völkerpsychologie. In this treatise, Steinthal sought to find a coherency of Deuteronomy, which originally consists of various sources, as Bible studies had revealed already in the mid-nineteenth century. Steinthal found it in the prosaic style of Deuteronomy, which he characterized as ‘charming’ and ‘endearing’, and it marked for him the birth of Jewish national literature and Jewish national spirit or national mind (Volksgeist). In conclusion, his treatise is reconsidered in its historical context. It was a challenge to reconstruct a synthetic view of Jewish literature, after Bible studies and the Wissenschaft des Judentums had pointed up the great variety and diversity within the history of Jews. Hermann Cohen succeeded in this task, building on Steinthal, in his major work, Religion of Reason Out of the Sources of Judaism.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Mackert, Michael. "The roots of franz boas’ view of linguistic categories as a window to the human mind." Historiographia Linguistica 20, no. 2-3 (1993): 331–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/hl.20.2-3.05mac.

Full text

Abstract:

Summary Historiographers of linguistics have frequently pointed out the presence of the Humboldtian term ‘inner form’ in Franz Boas’ (1858–1942) work on linguistic categorization and have suggested a link to Heymann Steinthal’s (1823–1899) Völkerpsychologie and psycholinguistics. This essay demonstrates, however, that Boas’ discourse on the inner form of language, grammatical categories, and the human mind did not develop in a unilinear fashion from the work of Steinthal. Although Boas adhered to a Steinthalian notion of inner form of language and linguistic relativism and his research on Native American languages was initially guided by Steinthal’s criteria ‘form’ and ‘material,’ Boas’ texts also exhibit some disontinuities with Steinthal’s work, and they carry traces linking his linguistics to the work of Adolf Bastian (1826–1905), Theodor Waitz (1826–1864), Herbert Spencer (1820–1903), Wilhelm Wundt (1832–1920), and Daniel Garrison Brinton (1837–1899). Boas strategically distanced his discourse from the hierarchical thinking underlying the work of Steinthal, Spencer, and Wundt. As part of this distancing strategy, Boas shifted from Herbartian psychology, informing his early phonetic theory, to an associationist framework, and he postulated a universal mental faculty of abstraction as a necessary condition for human language to arise. Boas also introduced the concept of ‘coordinate elements’ in morphology, and he assumed the existence of universal relational functions in the languages of the world.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Leopold, Joan. "Ernest Renan (1823–1892)." Historiographia Linguistica 37, no. 1-2 (2010): 75–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/hl.37.1-2.03leo.

Full text

Abstract:

Summary This article, a successor to the author’s 2002 “Steinthal and Max Müller: Comparative Lives”, attempts to situate the Semiticist and ‘Orientalist’ Ernest Renan in a nexus between the poles represented by Heymann Steinthal (1823–1899) and Friedrich Max Müller (1823–1900). Renan can be viewed as wavering — in the 1840s through 1860s — between (and perhaps developing from) a natural scientific and linguistic orientation influenced by Humboldtians such as August Friedrich Pott (1802–1887) and the Völkerpsychologist Steinthal and a racial ideology in linguistics similar to that of the more historicist linguist Max Müller. Max Müller had a similar set of influences in Paris to Renan in this period, such as their common amateur mentor Baron Ferdinand von Eckstein (1790–1861) and Collège de France professor Eugène Burnouf (1801–1852). But a crucial hypothesis relates to how much Renan was influenced in his change to racial ideology by the advent of the 1848 Revolution. The author explains how this hypothesis can be tested by specific further research into the manuscript of Renan’s 1847 Prix Volney prizewinning essay.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Reda, El Alami, Kadiri Mohammed, Driss Jeddi, et al. "Hahn-Steinthal Fracture: About 3 Cases." SAS Journal of Surgery 06, no. 05 (2020): 215–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.36347/sasjs.2020.v06i05.001.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Thomas, Abey. "Displaced Hahn-Steinthal fracture: a case report." IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences 12, no. 1 (2013): 27–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.9790/0853-1212729.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Lessing, Hans-Ulrich. "Zum letzten Band der Lazarus-Steinthal-Briefe." Dilthey-Jahrbuch für Philosophie und Geschichte der Geisteswissenschaften 4 (1986): 274–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/dj1986-87414.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Pénisson, Pierre. "Steinthal : la linguistique entre l’allemand et l’hébreu." Revue germanique internationale, no. 17 (January 15, 2002): 55–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/rgi.883.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Pénisson, Pierre. "Heymann Steinthal et la psychologie linguistique des peuples." Revue germanique internationale, no. 10 (July 15, 1998): 41–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/rgi.685.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Eling, Paul. "The psycholinguistic approach to aphasia of Chajim Steinthal." Aphasiology 20, no. 9 (2006): 1072–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02687030600741600.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Trautmann-Waller, Céline. "La Psychologie des peuples de Heymann Steinthal et Moritz Lazarus." Revue d'Histoire des Sciences Humaines 19, no. 2 (2008): 197. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/rhsh.019.0197.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Bondě, Davide. "Heymann Steinthal tra scienze della cultura e "filosofia della storia"." RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA, no. 4 (December 2010): 781–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.3280/sf2010-004008.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Parfait Bienvenu Bouhelo-Pam, Kevin, Amine El Rhazi, Mohamed Azarkane, et al. "Le vissage d’Herbert dans la fracture de Hahn-Steinthal – 3 cas." Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique 100, no. 7 (2014): S310—S311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rcot.2014.09.242.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Nithyananth, J. Manasseh, Vinoo Mathew Cherian, K. Venkatesh, and Rohit Amritanand. "Bilateral Hahn–Steinthal fracture: a case report and review of literature." European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 18, no. 5 (2008): 395–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00590-008-0323-8.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Kalmar, Ivan. "The Volkerpsychologie of Lazarus and Steinthal and the Modern Concept of Culture." Journal of the History of Ideas 48, no. 4 (1987): 671. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2709693.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Benes, Tuska. "Language and the cognitive subject: Heymann Steinthal (1823–1899) and Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900)." Language & Communication 26, no. 3-4 (2006): 218–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2006.02.005.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Dendane, M. A., H. Gorinda, A. Amrani, and Z. F. El Alami. "La fracture de Hahn-Steinthal chez l’adolescent. Une lésion rare à ne pas méconnaître." Journal de Traumatologie du Sport 28, no. 4 (2011): 251–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jts.2011.10.002.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Westerkamp, Dirk. "Sprache, objektiver Geist und kulturelles Gedächtnis." Zeitschrift für Kulturphilosophie 2008, no. 2 (2008): 279–304. http://dx.doi.org/10.28937/1000106503.

Full text

Abstract:

The paper argues that a philosophically sound theory of cultural memory has to clarify three presuppositions. First, the relationship between individual and collective memory has to be explained. Second, the empirical data on recollection and memory provided by neurological and historical research has to be discussed in terms of a philosophy of culture. Third, the specific material and/or immaterial „memory-bearers“ or memory-media („Trägermedien“) in which cultural memory takes shape have to be examined. The article, then, shows that the first elaborate account of cultural memory was given by 19th century „Völkerpsychologie“, inaugurated by Moritz Lazarus and Heyman Steinthal. Their theory of cultural memory was much indebted to a critical interpretation of Hegel’s conception of „objective spirit“. Accordingly, the last sections of the paper give a reexamination of Hegel’s theory of recollection and memory and deal with the question whether this theory can contribute to present cultural memory discourse.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Veldre, Georgia. "Zur Diskussion Über den Begriff ‘Tochtersprache’ im 19. Jahrhundert." Historiographia Linguistica 19, no. 1 (1992): 65–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/hl.19.1.05vel.

Full text

Abstract:

Zusammenfassung Der Begriff ‘Tochtersprache’ spielt in der Sprachdiskussion des 19. Jahrhunderts eine eher untergeordnete Rolle, seine inhaltliche Bestimmung ist jedoch in Zusammenhang mit dem Orientierungswechsel innerhalb der vergleichenden Sprachbetrachtung von Interesse. Vor allem durch die Abgrenzung gegenüber dem Komplementärbegriff ‘Schwestersprache’ u.a. durch Franz Bopp gewinnt er deutlich an Präzision. Innerhalb des von den beiden Schlegel ausgehenden Sprachenklassifikationsmodells ist insbesondere die Bestimmung des Verhältnisses von ‘Tochtersprachen’ zum analytischen Sprachtyp problematisch. In einem anderen Kontext dient die Bezeichnung ‘Tochtersprache’ in direkter Abbildung politischer Auffassungen auf die Sprachbetrachtung dazu, das Französische als vom Latein abgeleitete Sprache insbesondere dem ‘ursprünglichen’ Deutschen gegenüberzustellen. Die inhaltliche Reduzierung auf den oftmals ideologisch geladenen Begriff des Verfalls, die nach 1850 insbesondere durch Heymann Steinthal erfolgt, führt in der zweiten Hälfte des 19. Jahrhunderts zu einer kritischen Bewertung des Tochtersprachenbegriffs, der in einem auf nachweisbare ‘Fakten’ orientierten sprachwissenschaftlichen Konzept an Bedeutung verliert. Einen wesentlichen Einfluß auf diese Diskussion haben die Vertreter der in Deutschland noch jungen Neuphilologien.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Albano Leoni, Federico, and Francesca M. Dovetto. "From Maine de Biran to the ‘Motor Theory’ of speech." Historiographia Linguistica 23, no. 3 (1996): 347–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/hl.23.3.06alb.

Full text

Abstract:

Summary The basic idea of the modern Motor Theory of Speech Perception (Liberman et al. 1963) is that “the perception of speech is tightly linked to the feedback from the speaker’s own articulatory movements”. In this paper we try to show how the same idea was already formulated by the French philosopher Maine de Biran (1805) and taken up in the second half of the 19th century by psychologists (like Steinthal) and linguists (like Kruszewski and Paul). However, whereas in the 19th century the articulatory point of view was not only dominant, but also the only one incorporated in a general theory of language, in the 20th century the articulatory perspective is supplemented by the acoustic one (cf. Malmberg 1967). This was only hinted at by Ferdinand de Saussure in the Cours, but fully expressed in Jakobson & Halle (1956). In this respect, Liberman’s Motor Theory is to be considered much less original than it has been claimed.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Guski-Leinwand, Susanne. "Becoming a Science." Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology 217, no. 2 (2009): 79–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409.217.2.79.

Full text

Abstract:

The scientific approach of “Völkerpsychologie” (roughly translated in English as “ethnic psychology”) as founded by Lazarus and Steinthal, and later by Wilhelm Wundt, was criticized early on by conservative protagonists in Germany, such as Houston Stewart Chamberlain and others. This article looks into how their criticism influenced and changed Völkerpsychologie in its two facets: Völkerpsychologie as a theoretical approach and as an “applied approach.” Furthermore, the consequences of this double concept and the change to Völkerpsychologie regarding its role and the meaning for political objectives are discussed. In contrast to Wundt’s theoretical Völkerpsychologie, which is based on the thesis that peoples’ development originally started with similar behaviors, the so-called applied or “differentielle Völkerpsychologie” implied that people are different, that they are devaluated, selected, and eventually separated as races from one another. Changing psychology by adding a more biological dimension and approach led to differentielle Völkerpsychologie becoming an instrument for political goals. The concluding section of this article focuses on the question of to what extent this change of Völkerpsychologie might have prepared the foundation for totalitarian structures.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

McElvenny, James. "August Schleicher and Materialism in 19th-Century Linguistics." Historiographia Linguistica 45, no. 1-2 (2018): 133–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/hl.00018.mce.

Full text

Abstract:

Summary Towards the end of his career, August Schleicher (1821–1868), the great consolidator of Indo-European historical-comparative linguistics in the mid-19th century, famously drew explicit parallels between linguistics and the new evolutionary theory of Darwinism. Based on this, it has become customary in linguistic historiography to refer to Schleicher’s ‘Darwinian’ theory of language, even though it has long been established that Schleicher’s views have other origins that pre-date his contact with Darwinism. For his contemporary critics in Germany, however, Schleicher’s thinking was an example not of Darwinism but of ‘materialism’. This article examines what ‘materialism’ meant in 19th-century Germany – its philosophical as well as its political dimensions – and looks at why Schleicher’s critics applied this label to him. It analyses the relevant aspects of Schleicher’s linguistics and philosophy of science and the criticisms directed against them by H. Steinthal (1823–1899). It then discusses the contemporary movement of scientific materialism and shows how Schleicher’s political views, social background and personal experiences bound him to this movement.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Jeevannavar, S. S., K. S. Shenoy, and R. M. Daddimani. "Corrective osteotomy through fracture site and internal fixation with headless screws for type I (Hahn-Steinthal) capitellar malunion." Case Reports 2013, may24 1 (2013): bcr2013009230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2013-009230.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Trautmann-Waller, Céline. "Du « caractère des peuples sémitiques » à une « science de la mythologie hébraïque » (Ernest Renan, Heymann Steinthal, Ignác Goldziher)." Revue germanique internationale, no. 7 (May 15, 2008): 169–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/rgi.408.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Boumediane, El Mehdi, Youssef Najeb, Abkari Imad, and Faycale Tajeddine. "La fracture de Hahn Steinthal traitée par vissage à propos d’un cas et revue de la littérature récente." Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation 35, no. 6 (2016): 466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hansur.2016.10.127.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Meyran, Régis. "Céline Trautmann-Waller, Aux origines d’une science allemande de la culture. Linguistique et psychologie des peuples chez Heymann Steinthal." Gradhiva, no. 5 (May 1, 2007): 135–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/gradhiva.832.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Rupp-Eisenreich, Britta. "Céline Trautmann-Waller, Aux origines d’une science allemande de la culture. Linguistique et psychologie des peuples chez Heymann Steinthal." L'Homme, no. 184 (November 1, 2007): 235–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/lhomme.12972.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Trautmann-Waller, Céline. "Aux origines de la narratologie : mythe, poésie populaire et épopée entre philologie allemande et philologie russe (Steinthal, Potebnja, Veselovskij)." Revue germanique internationale, no. 3 (April 28, 2006): 95–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/rgi.117.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Christy, T. Craig. "Aux origines d’une science allemande de la culture: Linguistique et psychologie des peuples chez Heymann Steinthal. By Céline Trautmann-Waller." Historiographia Linguistica International Journal for the History of the Language Sciences 36, no. 2-3 (2009): 452–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/hl.36.2-3.19chr.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Christy, T. Craig. "Aux origines d’une science allemande de la culture: Linguistique et psychologie des peuples chez Heymann Steinthal. By Céline Trautmann-Waller." Quot homines tot artes: New Studies in Missionary Linguistics 36, no. 2-3 (2009): 452–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/hl.36.2.19chr.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

KLAUTKE, EGBERT. "THE FRENCH RECEPTION OFVÖLKERPSYCHOLOGIEAND THE ORIGINS OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES." Modern Intellectual History 10, no. 2 (2013): 293–316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1479244313000024.

Full text

Abstract:

This article reconstructs French readings and debates of German approaches toVölkerpsychologie. Irrespective of its academic credentials,Völkerpsychologiewas a symptomatic approach during a transformative period in German, and indeed European, intellectual history: based on the idea of progress—both scientific and moral—and on the belief in the primordial importance of theVolk, it represented the mindset of “ascendant liberalism” in an almost pure form. The relevance and importance ofVölkerpsychologiecan be gauged from a list of scholars and intellectuals who discussed its merits as well as its problems. Moreover, the reception ofVölkerpsychologiewas not restricted to German academics: it was in France where central elements ofVölkerpsychologiehad the most profound effect on scholars who tried to establish a social science. Some of the best-known French academics and intellectuals of the late nineteenth and the early twentieth centuries—Théodule Ribot, Célestin Bouglé, Ernest Renan, Alfred Fouillée, Emile Durkheim, and Marcel Mauss—commented extensively on the works of Moritz Lazarus, Heymann Steinthal and Wilhelm Wundt, and developed their concepts of a “social science” that would reach beyond traditional philosophy, philology and history in a close dialogue with their German colleagues. HenceVölkerpsychologiewas not a German oddity, but an integral part of the debates that led to the establishing of the modern social sciences, as its French reception shows.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Driel, Lodewijk van. "19th-century linguistics." Historiographia Linguistica 15, no. 1-2 (1988): 155–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/hl.15.1-2.09dri.

Full text

Abstract:

Summary In this paper an attempt has been made to draw a picture of linguistics in the Netherlands during the 19th century. The aim of this survey is to make clear that the influence of German linguistics on Dutch works of the period is characteristic of the development of Dutch linguistics in that century. Emphasis has been placed on the period 1800–1870; three traditions are distinguished: First of all there is the tradition of prescriptive grammar and language instruction. Next attention is drawn to the tradition of historical-comparative linguistics. Finally, by about the middle of the century, the linguistic views of German representatives of general grammar become prominent in Dutch school grammars. Successively we point to the reception by the schoolmasters of K. F. Becker’s (1775–1849) work; then Taco Roorda (1801–1874) is discussed, and the relationship between L. A. te Winkel (1809–1868) and H. Steinthal (1823–1899) is presented. In conjunction with Roorda’s work on Javanese the analysis of the so-called exotic languages is mentioned, an aspect of Dutch linguistics in the 19th century closely connected with the Dutch East Indies. It is obvious that the German theme is one of the most conspicuous common elements in 19th-century Dutch linguistics, as Dutch intellectuals in many respects took German culture as a model.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Hutton, Christopher M. "Chajim H. Steinthal: Sprachwissenschaftler und Philosoph im 19. Jahrhundert / Linguist and philosopher in the 19th century. Edited by Hartwig Wiedebach & Annette Winkelmann." Historiographia Linguistica 32, no. 1-2 (2005): 228–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/hl.32.2.15hut.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Koerner, E. F. K. "Aux Sources De La Sociolinguistique." Lingvisticæ Investigationes. International Journal of Linguistics and Language Resources 10, no. 2 (1986): 381–401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/li.10.2.08koe.

Full text

Abstract:

RESUME Bien que le terme 'sociolinguistics' n'ait ete introduit dans le vocabulai-re technique de la linguistique qu'en 1952 par Haver Currie et que la socio-linguistique ne soit devenue une sous-discipline importante de la science du langage que depuis les annees soixante (v. Bright 1966), cet article main-tient qu'une telle approche du langage existait depuis longtemps, peut-etre plus de cent ans. En d'autres mots, nous avangons qu'il y avait une sociolin-guistique bien avant la lettre. En effet, on retrouve dans la linguistique generate de Wiliam Dwight Whitney (1827-1894) et de Heymann Steinthal (1823-1899) et dans quel-ques articles de Michel Breal (1832-1915) des annees 60 et 70 du siecle dernier des observations qui mettent en relief la nature sociale du langage. Les dialectologues de la meme periode, surtout en France et dans les pays de langue allemande, etaient tout a fait conscients du fait que l'etude des patois, des parlers et des langues orales en general devait etre guidee par des considerations sociologiques (v. Malkiel 1976). Dans la linguistique compa-ree et historique c'est Antoine Meillet (1866-1936), eleve de Saussure et de Breal et collaborates de la revue d'Emile Durkheim, Vannee sociologique, au debut de notre siecle, qui a insiste sur l'importance de l'aspect social (et sociologique) dans l'etude du changement linguistique (par ex., Meillet 1905). Avec ses eleves de Paris, surtout Joseph Vendryes (1875-1960), Alf Sommerfelt (1892-1965) et Marcel Cohen (1884-1974), Meillet etablit l'ecole sociologique du langage (par ex., Vendryes 1921; Sommerfelt 1932; Cohen 1956). Enfin, il existe — a cote de la dialectologie et de l'histoire des langues — encore une troisieme source de la sociolinguistique: l'etude du bilinguisme (par ex., Max Weinreich 1931; Haugen 1953). Ces trois traditions de la recherche linguistique se trouvent toutes reunis dans l'etude de Uriel Weinreich (1926-1967), Languages in Contact (1953), et puisque l'ouvrage de William Labov de 1966, The Social Stratification of English in New York City, qui est souvent cite (bien a tort) comme point de depart de la sociolo-gie moderne, representait sa these de doctorate ecrite sous la direction de Weinreich, il n'est pas etonnant de voir ces traditions, surtout celles de la linguistique geographique et de la linguistique historique, maintenues dans l'oeuvre de Labov (par ex., 1976, 1982). SUMMARY Although the term 'sociolinguistics' was not introduced into linguistic nomenclature before 1952 (see Currie 1952) and the field became a recognized field of research in the late 1960s only (e.g., Bright 1966), it is clear that the subject did not begin two decades ago. Indeed, an investigation into the sources of 'sociolinguistics' reveals that its beginnings go back at least 100 years, to the work of William Dwight Whitney (1827-1894), Heymann Steinthal (1823-1899), Michel Breal (1832-1915), and others. However, these were the first programmatic statements and a number of developments in the study of language were necessary to converge upon the kind of sociolinguistics which most students of language associate with the name of William Labov (e.g., Labov 1966), at least in North America. Interestingly enough, it is also in the work of Labov (e.g., 1972) that the origins of 'sociolinguistics' (to some extent in contradistinction to the 'sociology of language' approach associated with Basil Bernstein, Joshua A. Fishman, and others) could be traced, although neither Labov nor the prolific Dell Hymes has written anything on the history of sociolinguistics. (Indeed, the only paper that comes close to it was written by an outsider to the field, the great Romance scholar Yakov Malkiel, in 1976.) In my paper, I shall demonstrate that there are essentially three major traditions of investigation that led to 'sociolinguistics', namely, (1) Dialectology, especially the work done in German-speaking lands and in France from the 1870s onwards (e.g., Georg Wenker [1852-1911], Jules Gillieron [1854-1926], and others) — part of which had been undertaken in an effort to verify and possibility to support the neogrammarian 'regularity hypothesis' of sound changes; (2) Historical Linguistics, in particular the kind advocated by Antoine Meillet (1866-1936) and his school (e.g., Meillet 1905; Vendryes 1921), which developed into a 'science sociologique' of linguistics in general (Sommerfelt 1932) and a 'sociologie du langage' (e.g., Cohen 1956) among the younger Meillet disciples, and (3) Bilingualism Studies (e.g., Max Weinreich 1931; Haugen 1953), traditions all of which can be found united in the 1953 study of Uriel Weinreich (1926-1967), who happens to have been Labov's teacher and mentor.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Koerner, E. F. Konrad. "Wilhelm Von Humboldt and North American Ethnolinguistics." Historiographia Linguistica 17, no. 1-2 (1990): 111–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/hl.17.1-2.10koe.

Full text

Abstract:

Summary Noam Chomsky’s frequent references to the work of Wilhelm von Humboldt during the 1960s produced a considerable revival of interest in this 19th-century scholar in North America. This paper demonstrates that there has been a long-standing influence of Humboldt’s ideas on American linguistics and that no ‘rediscovery’ was required. Although Humboldt’s first contacts with North-American scholars goes back to 1803, the present paper is confined to the posthumous phase of his influence which begins with the work of Heymann Steinthal (1823–1899) from about 1850 onwards. This was also a time when many young Americans went to Germany to complete their education; for instance William Dwight Whitney (1827–1894) spent several years at the universities of Tübingen and Berlin (1850–1854), and in his writings on general linguistics one can trace Humboldtian ideas. In 1885 Daniel G. Brinton (1837–1899) published an English translation of a manuscript by Humboldt on the structure of the verb in Amerindian languages. A year later Franz Boas (1858–1942) arrived from Berlin soon to establish himself as the foremost anthropologist with a strong interest in native language and culture. From then on we encounter Humboldtian ideas in the work of a number of North American anthropological linguists, most notably in the work of Edward Sapir (1884–1939). This is not only true with regard to matters of language classification and typology but also with regard to the philosophy of language, specifically, the relationship between a particular language structure and the kind of thinking it reflects or determines on the part of its speakers. Humboldtian ideas of ‘linguistic relativity’, enunciated in the writings of Whitney, Brinton, Boas, and others, were subsequently developed further by Sapir’s student Benjamin Lee Whorf (1897–1941). The transmission of the so-called Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis – which still today is attracting interest among cultural anthropologists and social psychologists, not only in North America – is the focus of the remainder of the paper. A general Humboldtian approach to language and culture, it is argued, is still present in the work of Dell Hymes and several of his students.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Di Cesare, Donatella. "Organismus der Sprachidee: H. Steinthals Weg von Humboldt zu Humboldt. Von Manfred Ringmacher." Historiographia Linguistica 24, no. 3 (1997): 417–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/hl.24.3.14dic.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Reiners, Stefan. "Kritik der historischen Vernunft in Zeitschriftenform." Internationales Archiv für Sozialgeschichte der deutschen Literatur 45, no. 2 (2020): 456–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/iasl-2020-0027.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractThis paper deals with Moritz Lazarus and Heymann Steinthal’s 19th century journal Zeitschrift für Völkerpsychologie und Sprachwissenschaft and its media-historical context. I will argue that the medial form of the journal enabled Völkerpsychologie’s founders to put their theory and methodology into practice by creating a forum for interdisciplinary collaboration and unification of the humanities as psychology and thus achieving their goal of a ʻcritique of historical reasonʼ, i. e., revealing the historical nature of reason, ethics, and culture in general.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Noras, Andrzej J. "Początki filozofii Cohena a problem psychologii." Kultura i Wartości, no. 13 (August 7, 2015): 153. http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/kw.2015.13.153.

Full text

Abstract:

Hermann Cohen, twórca neokantowskiej szkoły marburskiej, jest uznawany za jednego z najbardziej radykalnych reprezentantów antypsychologizmu. Okazuje się jednak, że stanowisko to jest rezultatem procesu, w którym ujawniają się trzy ważne elementy, a mianowicie spór o psychologię, spór o Platona i spór o Kanta. W pierwszym wypadku Cohen okazuje się związany z psychologicznie zorientowanymi językoznawcami, a mianowicie Heymannem Steinthalem i Moritzem Lazarusem. W drugim wypadku Cohen okazuje się interpretatorem Platona, przy czym początkowo ujmuje go w duchu psychologizmu, od którego się później dystansuje. I wreszcie, w trzecim wypadku, z tego wynika późniejszy obraz filozofii Kanta

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Thomas, Margaret (Margaret Ann). "The Prix Volney: Its History and Significance for the Development of Linguistic Research. Volumes 1a and 1b, and: The Prix Volney: Early Nineteenth-Century Contributions to General and Amerindian Linguistics: Du Ponceau and Rafinesque. Volume 2, and: The Prix Volney: Contributions to Comparative Indo-European, African and Chinese Linguistics: Max Muller and Steinthal. Volume 3 (review)." Language 78, no. 2 (2002): 335–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/lan.2002.0137.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Gnatenko, P. I. "Society, Ethnicity, People: Dialectics of COMMUNICATION. Results of scientific research." All Ukrainian scientific-practical magazine Principal of School Liceum Gymnasium, no. 6 (2019): 6–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.37836/2309-7744-2019-6-1.

Full text

Abstract:

In the article the problem of the interconnection of social philosophy and social psychology is considered. The dialectic of their relationship is analyzed. Based on the work of domestic philosophers and psychologists, the author reveals the methodological nature of the principles of social philosophy to determine the essence of social psychology. The importance of the researches of G. Steintal, M. Lazar, V. Wundt, G. Lebon and G. Tarde for the development of social psychology as a scholar discipline is investigated. It is emphasized that social philosophy and social psychology are complementary. Social philosophy is based on the theoretical and methodological principles of analysis, and social psychology is the concrete factual material of individual and super-individual being, since empirical research methods occupy a significant place in social psychology, the role of which is much less in social philosophy. Social philosophy uses the theoretical and methodological principles of analysis, and social psychology is distinguished by the concrete factual material of individual and super-individual being. Empirical research methods occupy a significant place in social psychology, their role is much less in social philosophy.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Lauria, Philippe. "La femme et sa destinée d'après Edith Stein." Labyrinth 16, no. 2 (2014): 92. http://dx.doi.org/10.25180/lj.v16i2.5.

Full text

Abstract:

Woman's Destiny according Edith SteinThe following essay aims to show that Edith Stein's conception of women was a feminist and a traditionalist one. This could be interpreted by some philosophers as a sort of contradiction. Thus the author presents the different arguments detecting such a conflict between feminism and traditionalism. These arguments are based in fact on the opposition between nature or essence, on the one hand, and freedom, on the other hand. The thesis of the author is that there is not necessarily a conflict between essence and freedom, and that essence is not a fiction but an ontological reality which, interpreted in the way of Edith Stein, makes it possible to conceive sexual difference in a perfect synthesis between the Christian tradition and gender equality.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Heid, Ludger. "Evelyn Steinthaler: Mag’s im Himmel sein, mag’s beim Teufel sein. Stars und die Liebe unter dem Hakenkreuz." Das Historisch-Politische Buch (HPB): Volume 67, Issue 3 67, no. 3 (2019): 361–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.3790/hpb.67.3.361b.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Graffi, Giorgio. "The treatment of syntax by some early 19th-century linguists." Historiographia Linguistica 25, no. 3 (1998): 257–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/hl.25.3.04gra.

Full text

Abstract:

Summary This article examines the views about syntax held by Humboldt, on the one hand, and by the founders of historical-comparative grammar (Bopp, Rask, Grimm, Pott, Schleicher), on the other. In general, it is noted that the grammaire générale tradition of 17th and 18th centuries still survives in the work of such scholars, despite of all criticism they seemingly raised against it. For Humboldt, the common core of all languages has its source in the identity of human thought; also his treatment of the verb and especially his reference to a ‘natural’ word order (i.e., SVO) are clearly reminiscent of this tradition. Traces thereof are also found in Bopp’s analysis of Indo-European conjugation, and in some of Rask’s writings. For instance, Rask, just as Humboldt, assumes a ‘natural’ word order and proposes a list of possible syntactic forms which closely remind us of Girard’s membres de phrase. Grimm’s position appears as more innovative, heavily influenced by a Romantic view of language, but some older conceptions sometimes show up in his work, e.g., when he deals with the notion of ‘subject’. Pott does not completely reject general grammar and a logically-based view of language; he only stresses the need of a more empirical approach than that adopted by the 17th and 18th century linguists. This picture radically changed with Steinthai and Schleicher: the former scholar pronounced a ‘divorce’ between grammar and logic, while the latter one argued that syntax does not belong to linguistics proper and rejected any possibility of postulating syntactic distinctions which do not have any direct morphological correlate.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Bischof, Günter. "Niko Rohrbach, and Niko Wahl, eds. Austria—A Soldier's Guide, trans. Evelyn Steinthaler. Vienna: Cerznin Verlag, 2017. Pp. 80." Austrian History Yearbook 49 (April 2018): 333–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0067237818000553.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Dubin, Steven C. "Official Images: New Deal Photography.Pete Daniel , Merry A. Foresta , Maren Strange , Sally SteinThe Arts at Black Mountain College.Mary Emma Harris." American Journal of Sociology 94, no. 2 (1988): 421–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/229005.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Mackert, Michael. "Franz Boas’ Theory of Phonetics." Historiographia Linguistica 21, no. 3 (1994): 351–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/hl.21.3.04mac.

Full text

Abstract:

Summary Franz Boas’ (1858–1942) Statements on phonetics can only be appreciated adequately if they are read against the background of 19th-century experimental psychology, acoustics, physiology, and psychophysics. This paper demonstrates that Boas adhered to a theory of phonetics which included a physical and a psychological component. The former component was informed by contemporary ideas on phonetics put forward by Hermann Helmholtz (1821–1894), Wilhelm Wundt (1832–1920), Hermann Paul (1846–1921), and Mikołaj Kruszewski (1851–1887). Within this component, Boas included the production of speech sounds, their acoustical nature, and the mechanical workings of the ear. For Boas, speech-sounds were averages consisting of groups of oscillations which gave each sound its peculiar character. The ear analyzed speech-sounds into their component groups of oscillations, and the resulting sensations were individually transmitted into consciousness. The psychological component of Boas’ theory was influenced by Gustav Fechner’s (1801–1887) psychophysics, and it was initially based on Herbartian psychology. This second component included mental representations (Vorstellungen) of sounds, the process of apperception, and Fechner’s law of thresholds (Schwellengesetz). Boas’ theory presupposed a model of the mind as machine in which the ear was seen as a mechanical extension of the mind. Within this mechanical model of the mind, the recognition of speech-sounds was deterministically governed by the law of thresholds and the process of apperception. The interaction of the law of thresholds with the process of apperception was responsible for the phenomenon of alternating sounds. With the help of his theory, Boas countered positions which considered such seemingly fluctuating sounds as the hallmark of ‘primitive’ languages. In order to distance himself from Heymann Steinthal’s (1823–1899) Eurocentric linguistics, which was rooted in the Herbartian tradition, Boas later abandoned his Herbartian framework in favor of an associationist theory of psychology.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Cleveland, Ray L. "The Land Question in Palestine, 1917-1939, by Kenneth W. SteinThe Land Question in Palestine, 1917-1939, by Kenneth W. Stein. Chapel Hill and London, University of North Carolina Press, 1984. xxi, 314 pp. $29.00." Canadian Journal of History 21, no. 3 (1986): 462–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cjh.21.3.462.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Nawghare, Shishir P., Rudraprasad Baidyaray, and JGV Neyt. "Hahn-Steinthal fracture: a case report." Cases Journal 1, no. 1 (2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-1626-1-239.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Mutiso, VM. "Type I (Hannis - Steinthal) Capitellar Fracture: Case Report." East African Orthopaedic Journal 1, no. 1 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/eaoj.v1i1.49458.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Parfait, Bouhelo-Pam Kevin, El Rhazi Amine, Chmali Khalid, et al. "La fracture de Hahn Steinthal traitée par vissage d’Herbert: 3 cas." Pan African Medical Journal 20 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2015.20.30.4196.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!