Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Stepfamilies / Journal articles

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Stepfamilies.

Journal articles on the topic 'Stepfamilies'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 30 July 2024

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Stepfamilies.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Coleman, Marilyn, and Lawrence H. Ganong. "Stepfamilies from the Stepfamily's Perspective." Marriage & Family Review 26, no. 1-2 (December 9, 1997): 107–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/j002v26n01_07.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Mandell, Deena, and Esther Birenzweig. "Stepfamilies:." Journal of Divorce & Remarriage 14, no. 1 (October 19, 1990): 29–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/j087v14n01_04.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Everett,, Lou. "Stepfamilies." Nurse Educator 20, no. 6 (November 1995): 29–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006223-199511000-00011.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Barnes, Gill Gorell. "Stepfamilies." Advances in Psychiatric Treatment 4, no. 1 (January 1998): 10–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/apt.4.1.10.

Full text

Abstract:

Family life in Britain is changing daily to include more stepfamilies, which have widely differing structures with varying histories, losses, transitions and economic circumstances. Of the one in five children who currently experience separation before they are 16, over half will live in a stepfamily at some point in their lives. Of the 150 000 couples with children who divorced each year at the end of the 1980s, a further 35 000 had a subsequent divorce. For some children we need to think of step-parenting within wider processes of transition, which include relationship changes of many kinds. The National Stepfamily Association have calculated that if current trends of divorce, cohabitation, remarriage and birth continue, there will be around 2.5 million children and young adults growing up in a stepfamily by the year 2000. The true pattern of re-ordering of partnership and family life is hard to chart, since many couples second or third time around prefer to cohabit rather than to marry.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Guzzo, Karen Benjamin. "Shifts in Higher-Order Unions and Stepfamilies Among Currently Cohabiting and Married Women of Childbearing Age." Journal of Family Issues 38, no. 12 (August 13, 2016): 1775–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192513x16664180.

Full text

Abstract:

Shifts in union formation and childbearing have undoubtedly altered the prevalence and structure of higher-order unions and stepfamilies, but no study has examined trends over time. Comparing the 1988 and 2011-2013 cycles of the National Survey of Family Growth, I produce estimates of repartnering and stepfamily formation among currently partnered women aged 15 to 44 years. The percentage of intact unions that are remarriages stayed stable (around 27% to 28%), but a growing proportion of currently married and cohabiting women had another cohabiting partner in the past. The percentage of intact unions that are stepfamilies increased from 24% to 31%, with an increase in cohabiting stepfamilies from 19% to 39% of all stepfamilies. Furthermore, while the majority of remarriages are stepfamilies, the majority of women’s stepfamilies are no longer remarriages due to union formation among never-married parents. Cohabiting (but not marital) stepfamilies also exhibited changes in which partner had children and in shared childbearing.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Stewart, Susan D., and Elcy E. Timothy. "Stepfamily Policies and Laws in the United States: Lessons from the West." Journal of Family Issues 41, no. 7 (May 13, 2020): 891–912. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192513x20918429.

Full text

Abstract:

Although stepfamilies exist in some form in nearly every country in the world, they are most common in Western countries. This paper provides a summary of laws, policies, and programs pertaining to stepfamilies in a selection of Western countries, with a special focus on the United States. Although stepfamilies have been prevalent throughout the West for decades, they remain “incompletely institutionalized,” and governments have been slow to address their needs and concerns. There is large variation across Western countries with respect to how stepfamilies are treated under the law, with some countries employing more liberal definitions of “parents,” “children,” and “families,” than others. In contrast, stepfamilies in the United States must contend with a complex and conflicting set of federal laws, state laws, and court precedents. Their legal status is uncertain and the way stepfamilies are treated is inconsistent across social programs and policies. Overall, there is clear bias against stepfamilies within most U.S. institutions. The review includes recommendations for change that would enhance stepfamily stability and quality of life in both Western and non-Western contexts.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

White, Lynn, and William R. Beer. "American Stepfamilies." Social Forces 71, no. 4 (June 1993): 1098. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2580145.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Pasley, Kay, and William R. Beer. "American Stepfamilies." Family Relations 42, no. 1 (January 1993): 110. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/584938.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Hall, Kelley J., and Gay C. Kitson. "Lesbian Stepfamilies." Journal of Lesbian Studies 4, no. 3 (September 2000): 31–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/j155v04n03_02.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Webber, Ruth. "Making Stepfamilies Work: Step-relationships in Singaporean Stepfamilies." Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development 13, no. 2 (December 2003): 90–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21650993.2003.9755930.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Nozawa, Shinji. "Similarities and Variations in Stepfamily Dynamics among Selected Asian Societies." Journal of Family Issues 41, no. 7 (May 12, 2020): 913–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192513x20917766.

Full text

Abstract:

Stepfamilies, an emerging family form in Asia, are gaining growing academic and social attention in Asia. This paper presents an overview of stepfamilies in Asia, based primarily on research findings in Japan, which suggest underlying two competing stepfamily models as key factors in understanding stepfamily dynamics: the “scrap and build” household model versus the expanded and interconnected network model. The findings in Japan are, then, juxtaposed with existing research findings on stepfamilies in East Asia and Singapore in terms of (a) cultural views on stepfamilies; (b) values of grandparenting, mothering, and fathering; and (c) family law and policies. Some commonalities are found in remaining influence of the “scrap and build” household model and in recent policy changes toward the expanded and interconnected network model, along with some variations, across these societies. Evidently, more studies across Asian societies are needed to obtain a clearer picture of stepfamilies in Asia.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Kelley, Patricia. "Healthy Stepfamily Functioning." Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services 73, no. 10 (December 1992): 579–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/104438949207301001.

Full text

Abstract:

Stepfamilies are the fastest growing family form in the country. Although clinicians note the need for different family patterns for stepfamilies, those differences have not been identified and empirically tested. The predominance of literature on the subject has been problem focused: Research has often been based on families in treatment or has assessed differences in stepfamilies as problematic. In this exploratory research, well–functioning stepfamilies were interviewed in their homes, themes common to and different from biologically based families were noted, and differences from families in treatment were assessed. A further purpose of this study was to assess the usefulness of standardized family-functioning measures on this population.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Brownridge, Douglas A. "Male Partner Violence Against Women in Stepfamilies: An Analysis of Risk and Explanations in the Canadian Milieu." Violence and Victims 19, no. 1 (February 2004): 17–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/vivi.19.1.17.33239.

Full text

Abstract:

Using a representative sample of 2,703 Canadian women living in either a stepfamily or a biological family, this investigation assesses the extent of women’s elevated risk for violence in stepfamilies relative to biological families as well as explanations for this relationship. Canadian women living in stepfamilies are shown to be twice as likely as their counterparts in biological families to experience violence. Differences between the two groups are greatest on some of the most severe forms of violence, suggesting that women in stepfamilies are at particular risk for severe violence. Institutional incompleteness (number of children; depression; alcohol consumption), duration of relationship, evolutionary psychology (sexual possessiveness; sexual jealousy; female employment; education compatibility) and selection factors (previous marriage/common-law union; previous partner violence; marital status) are applied and tested. Results show partial support for each explanation and that no explanation alone accounts for the disproportionate risk of violence in stepfamilies. Rather, a combination of elements from all explanations is required to account for the higher odds of violence against women in stepfamilies.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Giles-Sims, Jean, and Gay Ochiltree. "Children in Stepfamilies." Journal of Marriage and the Family 53, no. 2 (May 1991): 525. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/352922.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Coleman, Marilyn, and Lawrence H. Ganong. "REMARRIAGE AND STEPFAMILIES." Family Court Review 29, no. 4 (March 15, 2005): 405–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.174-1617.1991.tb00248.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Stoll, Barre M., Genevieve L. Arnaut, Donald K. Fromme, and Jennifer A. Felker-Thayer. "Adolescents in Stepfamilies." Journal of Divorce & Remarriage 44, no. 1-2 (March 23, 2006): 177–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/j087v44n01_10.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Duran-Aydintug, Candan, and Marilyn Ihinger-Tallman. "Law and Stepfamilies." Marriage & Family Review 21, no. 3-4 (July 12, 1995): 169–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/j002v21n03_09.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Visher, Emily B., and John S. Visherf. "Stepfamilies are different." Journal of Family Therapy 7, no. 1 (1985): 9–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j..1985.00661.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Fredriksen-Goldsen, Karen I., and Pauline I. Erera. "Lesbian-Headed Stepfamilies." Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment 8, no. 2-3 (June 28, 2004): 171–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/j137v08n02_11.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Kupisch, Susan. "Children in Stepfamilies." School Psychology Review 20, no. 1 (March 1, 1991): 143–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02796015.1991.12085539.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Ihinger-Tallman, Marilyn. "Research on Stepfamilies." Annual Review of Sociology 14, no. 1 (August 1988): 25–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.000325.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Kelley, Patricia. "Stepfamilies Under Study." Contemporary Psychology: A Journal of Reviews 42, no. 3 (March 1997): 252–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/000537.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Miran-Khan, Claire. "Working with Stepfamilies." Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy 38, no. 3 (September 2017): 329–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anzf.1235.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Guzzo, Karen Benjamin. "Marriage and Dissolution Among Women’s Cohabitations: Variations by Stepfamily Status and Shared Childbearing." Journal of Family Issues 39, no. 4 (January 6, 2017): 1108–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192513x16686136.

Full text

Abstract:

Cohabiting unions increasingly involve children, either born during the union and/or from prior relationships (i.e., stepchildren). Drawing from arguments about the institutionalization of cohabitation and stepfamilies as well as the family systems perspective, this article examines dissolution and marriage risks among women’s cohabiting unions by stepfamily status, configuration (which partner has children), and shared intended and unintended fertility using the 2006-2013 National Survey of Family Growth. A minority (32%) of first cohabitations, but the majority of second (65%), and third (75%) cohabitations, are stepfamilies. Stepfamily cohabitations are less likely to transition to marriage compared with nonstepfamily unions, especially among complex stepfamilies (both partners have children), but neither stepfamily status nor configuration affect dissolution. Shared intended and unintended births are associated with dissolution and marriage risks but largely only for nonstepfamily cohabitations, suggesting that shared childbearing is only indicative of the institutionalization for cohabitations that are not stepfamilies.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Saint-Jacques, Marie-Christine, Élisabeth Godbout, and Hans Ivers. "People’s Opinions and Stereotypes about Stepfamilies." Journal of Family Issues 41, no. 11 (January 25, 2020): 2136–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192513x19896060.

Full text

Abstract:

The stepfamily represents an increasingly common form of the family structure. Numerous studies have nonetheless shown that people living in stepfamilies are often stigmatized. The present study focused on public opinion based on a representative sample ( N = 1,202) regarding: (a) stepfamilies as a unit; (b) the current situation and future of children; (c) the rights and responsibilities of stepparents; and (d) the perception of stepparents as well as the stereotypes about them. The results showed that people had a favorable opinion about some dimensions, like the future of children living in stepfamilies, but an examination of stereotypes concerning stepfathers and perceptions about stepparents showed a more unfavorable opinion. A latent class analysis showed that there were three opinion profiles. Though there was a positive perception of several stepfamily dimensions, it can be seen that the opinions about stepfamilies were not monolithic. Moreover, the stereotype of the sexual abuser was always present.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Kelley, Patricia. "Family-Centered Practice with Stepfamilies." Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services 77, no. 9 (November 1996): 535–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.970.

Full text

Abstract:

The stepfamily is one of the fastest growing family forms, and family-centered practitioners can expect to have such families in their case loads. Differences between stepfamilies and biologically based families need to be understood by practitioners, because work with these families requires different approaches. The author notes these differences as well as the usefulness and problematic aspects of the systemic and behavioral approaches traditionally used by family-centered practitioners in work with stepfamilies. An integrated model for working with stepfamilies, developed by the author, is presented. This model integrates postmodern approaches into eco-systemic and behavioral work.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Kirby, James B. "From Single-Parent Families to Stepfamilies." Journal of Family Issues 27, no. 5 (May 2006): 685–711. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192513x05284855.

Full text

Abstract:

This study addresses two questions: Is stepfamily formation associated with the likelihood that adolescents will initiate alcohol use, and if so, does this association differ by the type of single-parent families from which adolescents move or the type of stepfamilies to which they move? The author found that adolescents who moved to stepfamilies from single-parent families had an elevated risk of initiating alcohol use. A transition from a divorced single-parent family to a stepfamily is associated with an increase in alcohol initiation among boys, but a transition from an unwed single-parent family to a stepfamily is not. In contrast, girls who transition from an unwed single-parent family to a stepfamily show an elevated likelihood of initiating alcohol use, whereas those who transition from divorced single-parent families do not. Adolescents who move to cohabiting stepfamilies do not respond differently than do adolescents who move to married stepfamilies regardless of gender.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Gold, Joshua M. "Recognizing and Resolving Ethical Issues." Family Journal 26, no. 1 (January 2018): 73–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1066480718754768.

Full text

Abstract:

Counseling stepfamilies necessitates appreciating the relational complexity of this family constellation and the impact of these relational schema on the provisions of ethical counseling. Clinicians need to recognize common ethical concerns as specific to stepfamilies and learn how to resolve these potential concerns in a manner that enhances therapeutic service and honors the ethical aspirations of the counseling profession.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Kuhn, Daniel R., Darby J. Morhardt, and Geraldine Monbrod-Framburg. "Late-Life Marriages, Older Stepfamilies, and Alzheimer's Disease." Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services 74, no. 3 (March 1993): 154–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/104438949307400303.

Full text

Abstract:

Little attention has been focused on remarriage among older persons and on the effects of chronic illness on late-life marriages and kinship relations. The authors examine the developmental tasks of older stepfamilies and the impact of a dementing illness on family members. Case examples are provided and recommendations offered to enable older stepfamilies to cope with anticipated problems.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Stewart, Susan D. "Boundary Ambiguity in Stepfamilies." Journal of Family Issues 26, no. 7 (October 2005): 1002–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192513x04273591.

Full text

Abstract:

Family boundary ambiguity refers to a lack of clarity as to who is in and who is out of the family system. Few studies have examined this concept in the stepfamily context, which is problematic because such definitional problems hinder our understanding of close relationships in stepfamilies. Based on a nationally representative sample of first-married, remarried, and cohabiting couples with minor children, this study investigates the prevalence and nature of boundary ambiguity in stepfamilies (families that include children from previous unions) and the relationship between boundary ambiguity and couples’ relationship quality and stability. Results suggest that boundary ambiguity is much more prevalent in stepfamilies than original two-parent families and that boundary ambiguity is associated with the structure of the stepfamily. Boundary ambiguity is negatively associated with the quality of the couple’s relationship and stability of the union, but only from the perspective of wives and female partners.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Kreyenfeld, Michaela, and Valerie Martin. "Economic conditions of stepfamilies from a cross-national perspective." Journal of Family Research 23, no. 2 (September 1, 2011): 128–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.20377/jfr-204.

Full text

Abstract:

This paper investigates the economic conditions of stepfamilies in Germany, the Russian Federation and France using data from the first wave of the Generations and Gender Survey (GGS). The analysis shows that stepfamilies more often report economic hardship than nuclear families in France and Western Germany. Socio-demographic differences between family types – particularly the fact that stepfamilies tend to be larger families – explain the differences in economic well-being between families in France. For Western Germany, differences between nuclear and stepfamilies remain after controlling for socio-economic composition of different family types. For the Russian Federation and Eastern Germany, we do not find any statistically significant differences in economic well-being between stepfamilies and nuclear families. The major dividing line for these regions runs between single parents and other types of families. Zusammenfassung In diesem Beitrag werden die Daten der ersten Welle des Generations and Gender Survey (GGS) verwendet, um die die ökonomische Situation von Stieffamilien in Deutschland, der russischen Föderation und Frankreich zu untersuchen. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass Stieffamilien in Frankreich und in Westdeutschland häufiger ökonomischen Schwierigkeiten ausgesetzt sind als Kernfamilien. Soziodemographische Unterschiede zwischen den unterschiedlichen Familientypen, insbesondere die Tatsache, dass Stieffamilien größere Familien mit mehreren Kindern sind, können die Unterschiede in der Einschätzung der ökonomischen Situation in Frankreich erklären. Für Westdeutschland bleiben jedoch auch nach Kontrolle der soziodemographischen Merkmale die Unterschiede zwischen den Familientypen bestehen. Für die russische Föderation und für Ostdeutschland lassen sich keine signifikanten Unterschiede in der Einschätzung der ökonomischen Situation zwischen Stieffamilien und Kernfamilien aufzeigen. Die zentrale Trennlinie verläuft hier zwischen Alleinerziehenden und anderen Familienformen.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Temrin, Hans, Johanna Nordlund, Mikael Rying, and Birgitta S. Tullberg. "Is the higher rate of parental child homicide in stepfamilies an effect of non-genetic relatedness?" Current Zoology 57, no. 3 (June 1, 2011): 253–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/czoolo/57.3.253.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract In an evolutionary perspective individuals are expected to vary the degree of parental love and care in relation to the fitness value that a child represents. Hence, stepparents are expected to show less solicitude than genetically related parents, and this lack of genetic relatedness has been used to explain the higher frequencies of child abuse and homicide found in stepfamilies. However, other factors than non-genetic relatedness may cause this over-representation in stepfamilies. Here we use a 45-year data set of parental child homicides in Sweden to test two hypotheses related to the higher incidence in stepfamilies: 1) adults in different types of family differ in their general disposition to use violence, and 2) parents are more likely to kill stepchildren than genetically related children. Of the 152 perpetrators in biparental families there was an overrepresentation of perpetrators in step-families (n=27) compared with the general population. We found support for the first hypothesis in that both general and violent crime rates were higher in stepfamilies, both in the general population and among perpetrators of child homicide. However, we found no support for the second hypothesis because of the 27 perpetrators in stepfamilies the perpetrator killed a genetically related child in 13 cases, a stepchild in 13 cases and both types of children in one case. Moreover, out of the 12 families where the perpetrator lived with both stepchildren and genetic children, there was no bias towards killing stepchildren. Thus, we found no evidence for an effect of non-genetic relatedness per se.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Heintz-Martin, Valerie, Céline Le Bourdais, and Dana Hamplová. "Childbearing among Canadian stepfamilies." Canadian Studies in Population 41, no. 1-2 (March 19, 2014): 61. http://dx.doi.org/10.25336/p6d89w.

Full text

Abstract:

This article analyses childbearing in stepfamilies in Canada, using the 2001 General Social Survey on family. It estimates the probability that stepfamily couples will give birth to a child according to the composition of the stepfamily, and then moves on to explore the factors that are associated with such an event. Particular attention is given to the type of union, parental status, and number of children of both partners. Contrary to past studies, this research is based not only on women’s retrospective conjugal and parental histories but also on those reported by male respondents, and it controls for women’s work status.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Pill, Cynthia J. "Stepfamilies: Redefining the Family." Family Relations 39, no. 2 (April 1990): 186. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/585722.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Reutter, L. "Children and New Stepfamilies." Nurse Practitioner 12, no. 1 (January 1987): 82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006205-198701000-00018.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Gold, Joshua M. "Intergenerational Attachments in Stepfamilies." Family Journal 23, no. 2 (March 20, 2015): 194–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1066480715572979.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Bray, James H. "Assessment Issues with Stepfamilies." Family Journal 2, no. 2 (April 1994): 163–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1066480794022014.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Berger, Roni. "Children Draw Their Stepfamilies." Journal of Family Psychotherapy 5, no. 4 (February 7, 1995): 33–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/j085v05n04_05.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Visher, Emily B., and John S. Visher. "Dynamics of Successful Stepfamilies." Journal of Divorce & Remarriage 14, no. 1 (October 19, 1990): 3–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/j087v14n01_02.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Berger, Roni. "Three Types of Stepfamilies." Journal of Divorce & Remarriage 24, no. 1-2 (March 1996): 35–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/j087v24n01_04.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Berger, Roni. "Stepfamilies in Cultural Context." Journal of Divorce & Remarriage 33, no. 1-2 (August 9, 2000): 111–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/j087v33n01_07.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Lewis, Helen Coale. "Family Therapy with Stepfamilies." Journal of Strategic and Systemic Therapies 4, no. 1 (March 1985): 13–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/jsst.1985.4.1.13.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Christopherson, Patricia M. "Book Review: American Stepfamilies." Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services 74, no. 3 (March 1993): 189–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/104438949307400308.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Ganong, Lawrence H., and Marilyn Coleman. "How Society Views Stepfamilies." Marriage & Family Review 26, no. 1-2 (December 9, 1997): 85–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/j002v26n01_06.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Bernstein, Anne C. "Stepfamilies from Siblings' Perspectives." Marriage & Family Review 26, no. 1-2 (December 9, 1997): 153–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/j002v26n01_10.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

HALFORD, KIM, JAN NICHOLSON, and MATTHEW SANDERS. "Couple Communication in Stepfamilies." Family Process 46, no. 4 (December 2007): 471–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2007.00226.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

COLEMAN, MARILYN, and LAWRENCE GANONG. "Marital Conflict in Stepfamilies." Youth & Society 19, no. 2 (December 1987): 151–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0044118x87019002004.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

van der Pas, Suzan, Theo G. van Tilburg, and Merril Silverstein. "Stepfamilies in Later Life." Journal of Marriage and Family 75, no. 5 (September 3, 2013): 1065–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12054.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Ihinger-Tallman, Marilyn, Gill Gorrell Barnes, Paul Thompson, Gwyn Daniel, and Natasha Burchardt. "Growing Up in Stepfamilies." Contemporary Sociology 28, no. 5 (September 1999): 555. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2655004.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Schroeder, Carolyn S., Betty N. Gordon, and Patricia McConnell. "Coping With Stepfamilies (Book)." Journal of Clinical Child Psychology 16, no. 3 (September 1987): 276–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp1603_27.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!