To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Stephen Criticism and interpretation.
Journal articles on the topic 'Stephen Criticism and interpretation'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Stephen Criticism and interpretation.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
Dale, James. "‘How can you say to me I am a King?’: New Historicism and its (Re)interpretations of the Design of Kingly Figures in Shakespeare’s History Plays." Multicultural Shakespeare: Translation, Appropriation and Performance 23, no. 38 (2021): 143–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/2083-8530.23.09.
Full textAbstract:
The 1980’s saw the emergence of New Historicist criticism, particularly through Stephen Greenblatt’s work. Its legacy remains influential, particularly on Shakespearean Studies. I wish to outline New Historicist methodological insights, comment on some of its criticisms and provide analytical comments on the changing approach to historical plays, asking “What has New Historicism brought into our understanding of historical plays and the way(s) of designing kingly power?” Examining Shakespeare’s second tetralogy, I will review Greenblatt’s contention that these plays largely focus on kingly power and its relationship to “subversion” and “containment”. I intend to focus on aspects of the plays that I believe have not received enough attention through New Historicism; particularly the design of the kingly figures.
2
Rodiah, Ita. "New Historicism: Kajian Sejarah dalam Karya Imajinatif Ukhruj Minha Ya Mal’un Saddam Hussein." Jurnal Kajian Islam Interdisipliner 4, no. 2 (2020): 125. http://dx.doi.org/10.14421/jkii.v4i2.1102.
Full textAbstract:
Penelitian ini membuktikan bahwa kajian kesusastraan dengan menggunakan new historicism mampu mengungkap pelbagai kekuatan budaya, sosial, ekonomi, dan politik yang menyetubuh dan menyelinap dalam setiap sela teks sastra yang merupakan ranah estetik (aesthetic richness). Penelitian ini mengungkapkan bahwa karya sastra tidak dapat dipisahkan dengan pelbagai konteks zaman dan praksis budaya, sosial, ekonomi, serta politik yang melingkupinya. Penelitian ini tidak sependapat dengan konsep new criticism John Crowe Ransom (The New Criticism, 1941 dan Criticism as Pure Speculation, 1971) dan William K. Wimsatt dan Monroe Beardsley (The Intentional Fallacy, 1946 dan The verbal Icon, 1954) yang mengatakan bahwa karya sastra merupakan autotelic artefact. Sehingga menjadi tidak tepat ketika pemahaman terhadap sastra dikaitkan dengan pengarang, pembaca, maupun konteks di luar karya sastra. Penelitian ini mendukung konsep new historicism Stephen Greenblatt (Practicing New Historicism, 2000) yang menyatakan bahwa dunia imajinatif-estetis tidak pernah terlepas dari relasi kekuasaan dunia realitas yang termanifestasi dalam karya sastra sebagai apresiasi estetis individu dan praksis budaya, sosial, ekonomi, dan politik. Berdasarkan interpretasi kritis new historicism Greenblatt terhadap novel Ukhruj Minha Ya Mal’un diperoleh hasil penelitian berupa pemahaman karya imajinatif yang penuh dengan simbol yang lebih lengkap dan dalam (deeper understanding of value) dengan melibatkan konteks ekstrinsikalitas karya sastra di dalamnya dan novel Ukhruj Minha Ya Mal’un hadir sebagai tanggapan reflektif-imajinatif Saddam Hussein sebagai pengarangnya.[This research proves that literary studies using new historicism can reveal the various cultural, social, economic, and political forces that intercourse and sneak in every literary text: aesthetic richness. This research reveals that literary works cannot be separated from the various contexts of the era and the cultural, social, economic, and political praxis that surround them. This study disagrees with the concept of new criticism John Crowe Ransom (The New Criticism, 1941 and Criticism as Pure Speculation, 1971) and William K. Wimsatt and Monroe Beardsley (The Intentional Fallacy, 1946 and The verbal Icon, 1954) literature is an autotelic artifact. So it is not appropriate when the understanding of literature is associated with authors, readers, and contexts outside of literary works. This research supports Stephen Greenblatt's new historicism concept (Practicing New Historicism, 2000), which states that the imaginative-aesthetic world is never separated from the power relations of the world of reality which are manifested in literature as an individual aesthetic appreciation and cultural, social, economic, and political praxis. Based on the critical interpretation of Greenblatt's new historicism of the Ukhruj Minha Ya Mal'un novel, the research results are in the form of a deeper understanding of imaginative works of symbols (deeper understanding of value) involving the context of the extrinsicality of literary works in it and the novel Ukhruj Minha Ya Mal. 'un appears as the reflective-imaginative response of Saddam Hussein as the author.]
3
Benson, Sean. "Materialist Criticism and Cordelia's Quasi-Resurrection in King Lear." Religion and the Arts 11, no. 3-4 (2007): 436–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156852907x244584.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractThis essay examines King Lear's belief that the dead Cordelia revives or resuscitates near the very end of the play. This quasi-resurrection, which occurs only in the First Folio (1623), has divided critics into those who regard the moment as mere delusion and others who see it as adumbrating a moment of blessed release. Following a survey of these "redemptionist" versus the predominant nihilist-oriented readings of the play, I examine the influential materialist interpretations offered by Stephen Greenblatt and Jonathan Dollimore. Both insist that Cordelia's quasi-resurrection, since it never reaches fruition, frustrates a religious understanding of the play. (Materialist criticism only counts tangible rewards as meaningful.) The play, however, is more consistent with Hans-Georg Gadamer's view that tragedy overwhelms us with its suffering rather than promotes this-worldly justice. Cordelia's quasi-resurrection gestures towards a possible otherworldly redemption even as it reminds audiences of the Resurrection that, in Lear's pagan world, cannot be replicated. Shakespeare's anachronisms thus superimpose the Christian resurrectionary tradition on the pagan setting of the play; his doing so places the hope and despair of the final scene—the contrast between their transcendent aspirations and the mundane reality of their unresurrected corpses—in the delicate equipoise of his art.
4
Anastasova, Maria. "Puritan Projections In Nathaniel Hawthorne’s "The Scarlet Letter" And Stephen King’s "Carrie"." English Studies at NBU 7, no. 1 (2021): 69–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.33919/esnbu.21.1.5.
Full textAbstract:
It is considered that the Puritans that populated New England in the 17th century left a distinctive mark on the American culture. The article explores some projections of Puritan legacy in two American novels of different periods – Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter (1850) and Stephen King’s Carrie (1974). After establishing a connection between the Puritan writings and gothic literature, the two novels are analyzed in terms of some Puritan projections, among which are the problem of guilt and the acceptance of an individual in the society. Some references regarding the idea of the witch and the interpretations it bears, especially in terms of the female identity, are also identified. Despite the different approach of the authors in terms of building their characters, those references are mostly used in a negative way, as an instrument of criticism and exposing inconvenient truths.
5
Febel, Gisela. "How to shape Black diasporic identity in France by reading (about) literature." Journal of Global Diaspora 3, no. 1 (2022): 55–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1386/gdm_00024_1.
Full textAbstract:
This article gives an overview of francophone African diasporic websites such as Africultures.com, africavivre.com and other digital magazines, networks and blogs that are present on different platforms. Taking recent novels, texts of literary criticism, reviews and comments as examples, I analyse in what way they share in discourse about diasporic and migratory identity positions of Afropéens (‘Afropeans’) (and differ therein from other readings of the same novels). Methodologically, I draw on Stephen Greenblatt’s concepts of self-fashioning and circulation of social energy as well as on Pierre Bourdieu’s notion of the production of social capital. With respect to socially preformed discursive formation of Black people as an ostensibly homogeneous minority in the twenty-first century France, I refer to Pap Ndiaye’s ground-breaking study La condition noire from 2009 which closely analyses the complex situation of the Black migrant and post-migrant population. I focus on two narrative texts which are widely perceived both in France and on an international level: First, the autobiographically inspired novel Le Ventre de l’Atlantique (The Belly of the Atlantic) by Fatou Diome and second, Marie Ndiaye’s narrative triptych Trois femmes puissantes (Three Strong Women). Studying remarks and comments of literary criticism concerning these texts on francophone African diasporic websites, I raise the following questions: What relevance do these narrated characters (still) have today? To what extent do they shape the discourse of Black migrants in France? What kind of interpretation of the colonial history and context do they offer? And which emancipatory moments and decolonial strategies create a new, proper symbolic capital and, thus, add to the Imagined Community of ‘Noirs en France’ (‘Black people in France’)?
6
Mandelbrote, Scott. "‘A duty of the greatest moment’: Isaac Newton and the writing of biblical criticism." British Journal for the History of Science 26, no. 3 (1993): 281–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s000708740003106x.
Full textAbstract:
Will Ladislaw's words, which so disillusion the young Dorothea, might also depress the modern interpreter of Newton's theology. Encountering the bulk of Newton's manuscript theology, it is tempting to sympathize with Dorothea's eventual response to The Key to all Mythologies, and to want nothing of it. The assessment of John Conduitt, Newton's son-in-law and executor, that his ‘relief and amusement was going to some other study, as history, chronology, divinity, and chemistry’ has in the past provided an ample excuse for those who have wished to take such a course, and to ignore Newton's biblical criticism. In the last three decades, however, Newton scholarship has come to terms with its hero's twilight activities, and reclassified them as being at least as important to him as the natural philosophy of the Principia, and intimately bound up with the thinking behind that philosophy. But although many modern scholars are now reluctant to see Newton as Stephen Hawking in breeches, historians of science have tended to concentrate on the implications for Newton's philosophy of his religious and alchemical writings, and in the process often have distorted their religious context. Historians of ideas have been beguiled by Newton's disciples, and by the esoteric texts from Newton's library, to ride hobbyhorses of their own which do not always illuminate Newton's reasons for writing theology. There is a danger of ‘knowing what is being done by the rest of the world’ before troubling with what Newton was up to when he worried about religion and theology, channelling his energies into treatise after treatise on the interpretation of prophecy. I want to suggest what some of Newton's concerns may have been, by looking at his ideas of religious duty and of the Church, and to liberate Newton from his disciples for long enough to consider some of his ideas about the relationships of prophetic and natural philosophical explorations of divinity.
7
Siti Heidi Karmela, Eva Meliana Magdalena Panggaribuan,. "AGAMA KATOLIK DI KOTA JAMBI 1925 – 2013." Istoria: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Sejarah Universitas Batanghari 4, no. 2 (2021): 68. http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/istoria.v4i2.91.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractThis research is a historical research with the theme of religion which examines religion from an empirical point of view rather than from a normative point of view. As for what is being researched is about the growth and development of Catholicism in the city of Jambi. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to explain historically the dynamics of Catholicism in Jambi City from the initial process of its spread to its development since the Dutch colonial period, the Japanese occupation, to independence, and to describe the existence of missionary groups who were important figures in the process of its spread. The method used is the historical method starting from the heuristic, criticism, interpretation, and historiographic stages. Some of the theories used refer to the theory from E.B. Taylor on the "theory of the soul" or "anima", Stephen K, Anderson on the "theory of stages of religious development", and the theory of R.N. Bellah on the evolution of religion. In the end, the findings obtained after conducting field research were that the Catholic religion that developed in Jambi City has gone through a long process in its history, was carried and spread by missionary groups (priests, brothers, nuns), and contributed a lot to the lives of the population starting from field work. religious, social, and economic.Keywords: Religion, Catholicism, Missionary, Jambi City AbstrakPenelitian ini merupakan penelitian sejarah yang bertemakan bertemakan agama yang mengkaji agama dari sudut empiris bukan dari segi normatifnya. Adapun yang diteliti adalah tentang pertumbuhan dan perkembangan agama Katolik di Kota Jambi. Oleh karenanya tujuan penelitian ini adalah menjelaskan secara historis dinamika agama katolik di Kota Jambi mulai dari proses awal penyebaran hingga perkembangannya sejak periode Kolonial Belanda, Pendudukan Jepang, hingga kemerdekaan, serta mendeskripsikan keberadaan kelompok misionaris yang menjadi tokoh penting dalam proses penyebarannya. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode sejarah mulai dari tahapan heuristik, kritik, interpretasi, dan historiografi. Beberapa teori yang dipakai mengacu pada Teori dari E.B. Taylor tentang “teori jiwa” atau “anima”, Stephen K, Anderson tentang “teori tahapan perkembangan agama”, dan teori dari R.N. Bellah tentang evolusi agama. Pada akhirnya hasil temuan yang didapat setelah melakukan penelitian lapangan adalah bahwa agama Katolik yang berkembang di Kota Jambi telah melewati proses panjang dalam sejarahnya, dibawa dan disebarkan oleh kelompok misionaris (pastor, bruder, suster), dan banyak berkontribusi bagi kehidupan penduduk mulai dari karya bidang keagamaan, sosial, dan ekonomi.Kata Kunci : Agama, Katolik, Misionaris, Kota Jambi
8
Beebe, James R., and Ryan Undercoffer. "Individual and Cross-Cultural Differences in Semantic Intuitions: New Experimental Findings." Journal of Cognition and Culture 16, no. 3-4 (2016): 322–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12342182.
Full textAbstract:
In 2004 Edouard Machery, Ron Mallon, Shaun Nichols and Stephen Stich published what has become one of the most widely discussed papers in experimental philosophy, in which they reported that East Asian and Western participants had different intuitions about the semantic reference of proper names. A flurry of criticisms of their work has emerged, and although various replications have been performed, many critics remain unconvinced. We review the current debate over Machery et al.’s (2004) results and take note of which objections to their work have been satisfactorily answered and which ones still need to be addressed. We then report the results of studies that reveal significant cross-cultural and intra-cultural differences in semantic intuitions when we control for variables that critics allege have had a potentially distorting effect on Machery et al.’s findings. These variables include the epistemic perspective from which participants are supposed to understand the research materials, unintended anchoring effects of those materials, and pragmatic factors involved in the interpretation of speech acts within them. Our results confirm the robustness of the cross-cultural differences observed by Machery et al. and thereby strengthen the philosophical challenge they pose.
9
Sénéchal, Héloϊse. "The Antitheatrical Criticism of Stephen Gosson." Literature Compass 1, no. 1 (2004): **. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4113.2004.00037.x.
Full text
10
Zaret, David, and Michael Walzer. "Interpretation and Social Criticism." Contemporary Sociology 17, no. 1 (1988): 122. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2069485.
Full text
11
Senchuk, Dennis M., and Michael Walzer. "Interpretation and Social Criticism." Noûs 26, no. 3 (1992): 389. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2215966.
Full text
12
Gorski, Philip S. "SCIENTISM, INTERPRETATION, AND CRITICISM." Zygon� 25, no. 3 (1990): 279–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1990.tb00793.x.
Full text
13
Rosen, Bernard. "Interpretation and Social Criticism." Journal of Higher Education 59, no. 6 (1988): 704–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1988.11780237.
Full text
14
Rosen, Bernard, and Michael Walzer. "Interpretation and Social Criticism." Journal of Higher Education 59, no. 6 (1988): 704. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1982241.
Full text
15
Green, Joel B. "Rethinking "History" for Theological Interpretation." Journal of Theological Interpretation 5, no. 2 (2011): 159–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/26421422.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract In recent years, theological interpretation of Christian Scripture has often been distinguished by its wholesale antipathy toward history and/or to historical criticism. Working with a typology of different forms of "historical criticism," this essay urges (1) that historical criticism understood as reconstruction of "what really happened" and/or historical criticism that assumes the necessary segregation of "facts" from "faith" is inimical to theological interpretation; (2) that this form of historical criticism is increasingly difficult to support in light of contemporary work in the philosophy of history; and (3) that contemporary theological interpretation is dependent on expressions of historical criticism concerned with the historical situation within which the biblical materials were generated, including the sociocultural conventions they take for granted.
16
Green, Joel B. "Rethinking "History" for Theological Interpretation." Journal of Theological Interpretation 5, no. 2 (2011): 159–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/jtheointe.5.2.0159.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract In recent years, theological interpretation of Christian Scripture has often been distinguished by its wholesale antipathy toward history and/or to historical criticism. Working with a typology of different forms of "historical criticism," this essay urges (1) that historical criticism understood as reconstruction of "what really happened" and/or historical criticism that assumes the necessary segregation of "facts" from "faith" is inimical to theological interpretation; (2) that this form of historical criticism is increasingly difficult to support in light of contemporary work in the philosophy of history; and (3) that contemporary theological interpretation is dependent on expressions of historical criticism concerned with the historical situation within which the biblical materials were generated, including the sociocultural conventions they take for granted.
17
Cezar, Cesar Ribas. "Suarez precursor de Descartes? A doutrina suareziana sobre a causa final revista." EDUCAÇÃO E FILOSOFIA 33, no. 68 (2020): 989–1022. http://dx.doi.org/10.14393/revedfil.v33n68a2019-48674.
Full textAbstract:
Suarez precursor de Descartes? A doutrina suazeriana sobre a causa final revista
Resumo: Stephan Schmid busca mostrar que Francisco Suárez é um precursor da crítica que Descartes fez à causalidade final na explicação da natureza. Suárez teria reduzido a noção de causa à causa eficiente, teria eliminado a presença da causa final nas ações dos agentes naturais, isto é, daqueles entes que não possuem intelecto, e teria eliminado a presença da causa final nas ações divinas. Deste modo, ele seria um precursor do pensamento mecanicista de Descartes e, sob certo aspecto, também de Espinosa. Contra esta interpretação, procuro mostrar que Suárez não reduz a noção de causa à causa eficiente, não elimina a presença da causa final nem nos agentes naturais, nem na ação divina e que, portanto, ele não pode ser considerado, neste assunto, um precursor de Descartes nem de Espinosa.
Palavras-Chave: Metafísica. Causa eficiente. Causa final.
Abstract: Stephan Schmid try to show that Francisco Suárez is a forerunner of the criticism made by Descartes of end causes in the explanation of nature. The hypothesis is that Suárez had reduced the notion of cause to efficient cause, had eliminated the presence of end causes in the actions of the natural agents, i. e., of the beings that have not an intellect, and had eliminated the presence of end causes in the actions of God. In this way he would be a forerunner of the mechanistic thought of Descartes and, from a certain aspect, of Spinoza. Against this interpretation I try to show that Suárez do not reduce the notion of cause to efficient cause and that he eliminates the presence of end cause neither in the natural agents nor in the actions of God. Therefore, he should be considered in this issue a forerunner neither of Descartes nor of Spinoza.
Keywords: Metaphysics. Efficient cause. End cause.
Résumé: Stephan Schmid essaie de montrer que Francisco Suárez est um précurseur de la critique faite par Descartes à la cause finale dans l’explication de la nature. Suárez aurait réduit la notion de cause à la cause efficiente, elimine la présence de la cause finale dans les actions des agentes naturels, c'est-à-dire, de ceux qui ne possèdent pas d'intellect, et aurait elimine la présence de la cause finale dans les actions divines. Il serait ainsi um précurseur de la pensée mécaniste de Descartes et, dans une certaine mesure, de Spinoza. Contre cette interprétation, j'essaie de montrer que Suárez ne réduit pas la notion de cause à la cause efficiente, n'élimine pas la présence de la cause finale ni dans les agentes naturels ni dans l'action divine et qu'il ne peut donc être considéré comme um précurseur de Descartes ni d'Espinosa.
Mots clés: Metaphysique. Cause finale. Cause eficiente.
Data de registro: 13/05/2019
Data de aceite: /10/2019
18
Morrow, Jeffrey L. "The Politics of Biblical Interpretation: A ‘Criticism of Criticism’." New Blackfriars 91, no. 1035 (2010): 528–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2005.2009.01342.x.
Full text
19
Rosenberg, Ruth, and Jerome J. McGann. "Textual Criticism and Literary Interpretation." South Central Review 3, no. 4 (1986): 119. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3189693.
Full text
20
Brown, S. "Reading Machines. Toward an Algorithmic Criticism. Stephen Ramsay." Literary and Linguistic Computing 28, no. 3 (2012): 480–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqs042.
Full text
21
Tatsumi, Takayuki. "The Future of Cyberpunk Criticism: Introduction to Transpacific Cyberpunk." Arts 8, no. 1 (2019): 40. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/arts8010040.
Full text
22
Davies, Paul, Greta Gaard, and Patrick D. Murphy. "Ecofeminist Literary Criticism: Theory, Interpretation, Pedagogy." Modern Language Review 95, no. 4 (2000): 1174. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3736723.
Full text
23
Woodward, Michael. "Dictionary of Biblical Criticism and Interpretation." Theological Librarianship 2, no. 1 (2009): 113–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.31046/tl.v2i1.74.
Full text
24
Robbins, Vernon K. "New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism." Rhetorica 3, no. 2 (1985): 145–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/rh.1985.3.2.145.
Full text
25
Fowler, Robert M., and George A. Kennedy. "New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism." Journal of Biblical Literature 105, no. 2 (1986): 328. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3260415.
Full text
26
Slater, Niall W. "‘Against Interpretation’: Petronius and art Criticism." Ramus 16, no. 1-2 (1987): 165–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0048671x00003295.
Full textAbstract:
For forty years a debate has raged in Petronian studies between the moralists and, for want of a better term, the anti-moralists. From Highet in the 1940's to Bacon and Arrowsmith in the 1950's and 60's, the moralists held a certain advantage. Whatever important divergences there were among these critics, all agreed on a Petronius who stood in some critical relation to his society. The dissenting voices have grown much louder of late. Ironically, the literary brilliance of Arrowsmith's New Critical reading of the Satyricon helped to turn the tide against the moralist viewpoint. The more apparent the literary sophistication of the Satyricon has become, the less willing late twentieth century readers have been to see a programmatic moral critique as its main purpose. Sullivan's view of Petronius as a ‘literary opportunist’ has come to dominate the field.With Graham Anderson's book, Eros Sophistes: Ancient Novelists at Play, the retreat from the position of Highet is now complete. We have finally reached the logical, New Critical conclusion that the Satyricon is an entirely self-contained literary game without any message whatsoever; in effect we are told that, like any serious piece of literature, the Satyricon ‘should not mean, but be’. Anderson is eager to disavow ‘the unproven conviction that every work must have a message, however diffusely or perversely expressed’.
27
Herbert, T. Walter, Roberta Rubenstein, and Amy Schrager Lang. "Feminist Literary Criticism and Cultural Interpretation." American Quarterly 39, no. 4 (1987): 656. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2713134.
Full text
28
Evans, R. L. S., and George A. Kennedy. "New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism." Classical World 80, no. 3 (1987): 222. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4350026.
Full text
29
Arutynyan, J. I. "Contemporary art criticism: judgment and interpretation." Vestnik of Saint Petersburg State University of Culture, no. 1 (30) (March 2017): 177–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.30725/2619-0303-2020-3-177-180.
Full textAbstract:
An important question of contemporary art studies is the problem of expanding the methodological base of the discipline. Modern art criticism refl ects the fundamental problems of contemporary art. Clash of the axiological approaches and the principle of interpretation, subjectivity, the infl uence of requests of the art market and commercialization are the main problems of formation of the expressive language of art criticism in the 20th–21st centuries
30
Perry, John Oliver, and G. N. Devy. "Indian Literary Criticism: Theory and Interpretation." World Literature Today 77, no. 1 (2003): 95. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/40157830.
Full text
31
Dietrich, Richard S. "Book Review: Interpretation and Social Criticism." Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 42, no. 3 (1988): 310–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002096438804200315.
Full text
32
Taylor, James E. "Hume on Miracles: Interpretation and Criticism." Philosophy Compass 2, no. 4 (2007): 611–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00088.x.
Full text
33
Sardocč, Mitja. "An Interview with Stephen Macedo." Theory and Research in Education 1, no. 3 (2003): 343–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1477878503001003006.
Full textAbstract:
In this interview, Stephen J. Macedo, Laurance S. Rockefeller Professor of Politics and the University Center for Human Values, and Director of the University Center for Human Values, at Princeton University, critically discusses some of the main lines of criticism addressed to contemporary liberal political theory and develops further a liberal conception of civic education presented in his book Diversity and Distrust. The main issues addressed in the interview present a detailed and well-documented critique of the hands-off stance toward diversity of the ‘politics of difference’ and articulate a pervasive defense of the project of ‘civic liberalism’ that supports a liberal agenda for civic education, necessary to sustain our liberal democratic regimes.
34
CAN GÜRBÜZ, Gülsevim. "Araştırıcı Sanat Eleştirisi ve Bir Sanat Eleştirisi Örneği." Journal of Social Research and Behavioral Sciences 7, no. 14 (2021): 150–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.52096/jsrbs.7.14.7.
Full textAbstract:
Art criticism can be described as an examination, determination, and mental activity that seeks the value of an art work. In an art criticism, different analysis strategies and methods can be chosen for the related artwork. Edmund Burke Feldman's “researching art criticism” criticism model, which is determined as a method in thearticle, is one of them. In th earticle, it is aimed to examine the method of “researching art criticism” in general, and in particular, to criticize Paula Rego’s artwork called “The Maids” with this method. For this criticism, “description, analysis, interpretation and judgment-evaluation” phases for the work were formed. Description and analysis subheadings are included in the “results section”. The other two subheadings, which include the relationship, interpretation and evaluation of the results section’s informations, are also considered as the “discussion section”. Keywords: Art criticism, Feldman model of criticism, Description, Analysis, İnterpretation, Judgment, Evaluation, Paula Rego, The Maids
35
Brown, Frank Burch. "Reading the Text: Biblical Criticism and Literary Theory. Stephen Prickett." Journal of Religion 75, no. 1 (1995): 164–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/489555.
Full text
36
Ridwan, MK. "TRADISI KRITIK TAFSIR: Diskursus Kritisisme Penafsiran dalam Wacana Qur’anic Studies." Jurnal THEOLOGIA 28, no. 1 (2017): 55. http://dx.doi.org/10.21580/teo.2017.28.1.1418.
Full textAbstract:
<div class="Section1"><p class="Iabstrak"><strong>Abstract: </strong><em>This paper aims to discuss the methodology of interpretation criticism in the qur'anic studies discourse. As new plots in the Qur'an studies, the interpretation criticism has not been much sought after by Qur’anic scholars. As a consequence, in methodological discourse has not yet found a definite method can be used to criticize an interpretation. As for the thought-provoking critique of the interpretation for this still are sporadic and likely are political-ideological. For that, it needs special attention in developing area studies the Quran towards the study criticism of interpretation. Finally, this paper gives the conclusion that, in the discourse of criticism the methodological framework needed interpretation, as a step towards the operational interpretation of criticism. So, the criticism was done not nuanced political-ideological, but able to uphold the values of objectivity, comprehensiveness, scientific and systematic. There are at least four operational steps in carrying out work interpretation of criticism of the region of ontology, epistemology, and axiology i.e; Firstly, the critic must understand the substance of exegesis are an interpretation as process and interpretation as a product. Secondly, understand the construction of criticism interpretation, namely the construction of the historicity of the critique, the base of criticism, the purpose of criticism, as well as the principles and parameters of criticism. Thirdly, start working with two regions exegesis critique work i.e; intrinsic and extrinsic criticism. Fourthly, give the evaluation and assessment of the object of study of criticism that is good and decent, or perverted and unworthy of being used.</em></p><p class="Iabstrak"><strong>Abstrak:</strong> Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mendiskusikan metodologi kritik tafsir dalam diskursus wacana Qur’anic Studies. Sebagai wilayah garapan baru dalam studi al-Qur’an, kritik tafsir belum banyak diminati oleh kalangan sarjana al-Qur’an. Akibatnya, dalam wacana metodologis belum banyak ditemukan metodebaku yang dapat digunakan untuk mengkritisi sebuah tafsir. Adapun pemikiran kritik tafsir selama ini masih bersifat sporadis dan cenderung bersifat politis-ideologis. Untuk itulah dibutuhkan perhatian khusus dalam mengembangkan wilayah studi al-Qur’an ke arah studi kritik tafsir. Akhirnya, tulisan ini memberikan kesimpulan bahwa, dalam diskursus kritisisme penafsiran, dibutuhkan kerangka metodologis sebagai langkah operasional kritik tafsir. Sehingga, kritik yang dilakukan tidak bernuansa politis-ideologis, namun mampu mengedepankan nilai-nilai objektivitas, komprehensivitas, ilmiah dan sistematis. Setidaknya terdapat empat langkah operasional dalam melaksanakan kerja kritik tafsir yang bermuara pada wilayah ontologis, epistemologis, dan aksiologis yaitu; Pertama, kritikus harus terlebih dahulu memahami hakikat tafsir yakni tafsir sebagai proses (<em>interpretation as process</em>) dan tafsir sebagai produk (interpretation as product). Kedua, memahami konstruksi kritik tafsir, yaitu historisitas kritik, landasan kritik, tujuan kritik, serta prinsip dan parameter kritik. Ketiga, memulai kerja kritik tafsir dengan dua wilayah kerja yaitu; kritik intrinsik dan kritik ekstrinsik. Keempat, memberikan evaluasi dan penilaian terhadap objek kajian kritik yaitu, baik (<em>maḥmūd</em>) dan layak pakai (<em>maqbūl</em>), atau menyeleweng (<em>munḥarif</em>) dan tidak layak digunakan (<em>mardūd</em>).</p></div>
37
Mkandawire, Thandika. "Rejoinder to Stephen Ellis." Journal of Modern African Studies 41, no. 3 (2003): 477–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022278x03004336.
Full textAbstract:
Stephen Ellis's response can be divided into two parts. One concerns my interpretation of the violence of rebel movements in Africa; the other relates to my misunderstanding of his position. With respect to the former, Ellis raises four objections. I will start with these.
38
JEON, Kyung-Jin. "A Criticism of Immoralistic Interpretation of Nietzsche." Journal of the Daedong Philosophical Association 77 (December 31, 2016): 23–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.20539/deadong.2016.77.02.
Full text
39
JEON, Kyung-Jin. "A Criticism of Immoralistic Interpretation of Nietzsche." Journal of the Daedong Philosophical Association 77 (December 31, 2016): 23–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.20539/deadong.2016.77.2.
Full text
40
Jabborova, Dilafruz. "Interpretation of Fitrat Dramas in Literary Criticism." International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology 9, no. 12 (2021): 2437–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2021.39332.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract: This article examines the fact that after the independence of Uzbekistan, the works of modern literature began to be reevaluated on the basis of new approaches. Literary scholar Ilhom Ganiev's monograph "Poetics of Fitrat dramas" is analyzed and the poetic world of the playwright is covered. The article is based on the analysis of the physicist's focus on Fitrat's character creation skills, the symbolic and figurative motives used in dramas, and the use of artistic language. Keywords and word expressions: drama, jadid literature, criticism, natural science, jadid studies, jadid writers, playwright, drama, symbolism, theater, tragedy, soviet ideology, “Abulfayzkhan”, confection, “Hindu ihtilotonzhon”, conflict, independence ideas, poetic thought, hermeneutic thinking, vulgar-sociological approach, principle, reassessment, new scientific and aesthetic thinking, systematic approach, analysis and interpretation, hermeneutics, synergetics, structuralism, historical-biographical approach, historical-cultural approach, modernism, absurdity, existentialism.
41
Pelias, Ronald J. "Schools of interpretation thought and performance criticism." Southern Speech Communication Journal 50, no. 4 (1985): 348–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10417948509372640.
Full text
42
NANNICELLI, TED. "Ethical Criticism and the Interpretation of Art." Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 75, no. 4 (2017): 401–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jaac.12395.
Full text
43
Kaufman, Daniel A. "Interpretation and the “Investigative” Concept of Criticism." Angelaki 17, no. 1 (2012): 3–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0969725x.2012.671635.
Full text
44
West, David W. "Practical Criticism: I.A. Richards' experiment in interpretation." Changing English 9, no. 2 (2002): 207–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1358684022000006311.
Full text
45
Wicaksono, Arif. "Pandangan Kekristenan Tentang Higher Criticism." FIDEI: Jurnal Teologi Sistematika dan Praktika 1, no. 1 (2018): 115–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.34081/fidei.v1i1.6.
Full textAbstract:
The interpretation of the Bible in the present continues to grow rapidly. This progress has both positive and negative effects in the realm of biblical interpretation. The positive impact that is with the progress of interpretation, it was found many truth values that were not understood and now start out one by one. The negative as the progress of biblical interpretation is the loss of boundaries. With the method of high-criticism interpretation makes the Bible originally believed to be the infallible Word, and now it is equated with another book of lesser value than the scriptures. The Bible is aligned with the ordinary book, even the authority of the Bible as God's Word is in doubt, denied and demeaned to an ordinary literary work.This is a challenge for Christianity today. It takes a firm stance in the face of the Higher Criticism interpretation movement. Christians need to determine a position to deflect any allegations that undermine the authority of the Bible and any allegations that cast doubt on the inspiration and revelation of the existing Scriptures. This paper is expected to give a little apologetic response to the Higher Criticism movement Keywords: Higher Criticism, Apologetic, Bible AbstrakPenafsiran Alkitab dalam masa kini terus mengalami perkembangan dengan pesat. Kemajuan ini memberikan dampak positif maupun negative dalam ranah dunia tafsir Alkitab. Positive karena dengan kemajuannya banak nilai-nilai kebenaran yang dul tidak dipahami mulai keluar satu persatu. Negatifnya saat kemajuan penafsiran Alkitab kehilangan batasan, dengan metode penafsiran higher Critism menjadikan Alkitab yang awalnya diyakini sebagai Firman yang tanpa salah, layaknya buku lain yang nilainya lebih rendah dari kitab suci. Aklitab disejajarkan dengan buku biasa. Bahkah otoritas Alkitab sebagai Firman Allah diragukan, disangkal dan direndahkan sebatas karya sastra biasa.Ini merupakan tantangan bagai kekristenan saat ini. Diperlukan sikap yang tegas dalam menghadapi pergerakan penafsiran Higher Critism. Orang Kristen perlu menentukan posisi dalam menangkis segala tuduhan yang merendahkan otoritas Alkitab. Segala tuduhan yang meragukan pengilhaman dan pewahyuan penulisan kitab Suci yang ada. Tulisan ini diharapkan memberikan sedikit sikap apologetika terhadap gerakan Higer Critism Kata Kunci: Higer Critism, Apologet, Alkitab
46
Rabbany T, Al-Faiz M., and Indal Abror. "TAFSIR PROGRESIF ATAS KISAH-KISAH DALAM AL-QUR’AN KARYA EKO PRASETYO." Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Hadis 19, no. 1 (2019): 85. http://dx.doi.org/10.14421/qh.2018.1901-05.
Full textAbstract:
Kitab Pembebasan is Eko Prasetyo’s first work in the field of interpretation contains the stories of prophets and friends in the Qur'an. For him, the stories of the prophets no longer have the power to change circumstances, then progressive logic brings Eko to an interpretation of the stories of the prophet to the surrounding social problems. When many commentators who interpret the Quran relate to the social community, then interpreting the Quran leads to social criticism being unique to discuss. So this paper is focused on discussing social criticism in the Book of Liberation. In this paper, there are indications of the content of social criticism Eko Prasetyo then grouped them into five fields, namely economics, religion, education, politics and society. Then explained based on the theme specifically. Then develop social criticism based on each theme. Among them is a criticism of the economic system of capitalism, interpretation of the meaning of Satan, tyranny, seditious and idolatrous, religious and financiers, criticism of Suharto and the New Order, the case of the murderous activist Salim deer. Also, Eko's other works were reviewed to develop his criticisms. The interpretation for Eko through the Book of Liberation is the contextualization of the problems that occur around him, Eko does not care about the interpretation of the interpretation, because for Eko, the Qur'an is a book of movements that must be practiced.Keyword: Eko Prasetyo, Progressive Interpretations, Qissah, al-Qur’an
47
Moberly, R. W. L. "Biblical Criticism and Religious Belief." Journal of Theological Interpretation 2, no. 1 (2008): 71–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/26421447.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract Moberly discusses John Barton's Nature of Biblical Criticism and takes issue with Barton's portrayal of theological interpretation as hostile to the values of biblical criticism. After showing how Barton misrepresents theological interpretation, not least because of a failure to do justice to the changing frames of reference of critical scholarship, Moberly extends the discussion to include the preunderstandings that interpreters inevitably bring to the Bible in ways analogous to how one reads a classic; the way in which appreciation of deep literature relates to personal maturity; and the way in which theological dogma, rightly understood, can make truer one's perception of reality.
48
Moberly, R. W. L. "Biblical Criticism and Religious Belief." Journal of Theological Interpretation 2, no. 1 (2008): 71–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/jtheointe.2.1.0071.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract Moberly discusses John Barton's Nature of Biblical Criticism and takes issue with Barton's portrayal of theological interpretation as hostile to the values of biblical criticism. After showing how Barton misrepresents theological interpretation, not least because of a failure to do justice to the changing frames of reference of critical scholarship, Moberly extends the discussion to include the preunderstandings that interpreters inevitably bring to the Bible in ways analogous to how one reads a classic; the way in which appreciation of deep literature relates to personal maturity; and the way in which theological dogma, rightly understood, can make truer one's perception of reality.
49
Harrison, Bernard. "Israel and Antisemitism." Journal of Contemporary Antisemitism 2, no. 1 (Spring 2019) (2019): 19–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.26613/jca/2.1.20.
Full textAbstract:
Recent senior legal opinion in Britain has inclined to the view that all criticism of Israel falls into the category of legitimate political opinion deserving the protection of laws guar- anteeing freedom of speech. Argument for this view, from Sir Stephen Sedley and others, is defective in that it ignores an evident distinction between antisemitism considered as an emotional disposition, and antisemitism considered as a deranged pseudo-explanatory political theory. Israel has become of late years the main focus for theoretical antisemitism of this latter kind. “Criticism” of this type is antisemitic, not because it manifests “hate speech” targeted at individual Jews qua Jews, but rather because it defames the Jewish community, falsely imagined by antisemites of this type to be unanimous, uncritical, and politically isolated in its support for Israel. The kinds of “criticism” of Israel characterized as antisemitic by the IHRA Definition of antisemitism are all of this type; and the Definition therefore poses, contrary to opinion widely expressed in recent debate on both sides of the Atlantic, no threat whatsoever to freedom of speech. Keywords: IHRA Definition, Sir Stephen Sedley, Social vs. Political Antisemitism, Labour Party
50
Uniłowski, Krzysztof, and Jakob Ziguras. "Textualism, Materialism, Immersion, Interpretation." Praktyka Teoretyczna 34, no. 4 (2019): 13–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/prt2019.4.2.
Full textAbstract:
Krzysztof Uniłowski passed away earlier this December. For the last twenty years, he has been crucial to Polish literary studies. Writing on a broad range of topics – from reviews of contemporary Polish novels to essays on the idea of modernity, from class-oriented analyses of sci-fi books and TV shows to comments on the politics and ethics of literary criticism – he developed an impressive and highly unique critical perspective, or indeed: a unique language of criticism, one that has managed and will undoubtedly still manage to inspire countless critics of all generations. Throughout his work, Uniłowski drew heavily on historical materialism, constantly balancing his instinctive focus on the political – and, specifically, on class – with his equally instinctive conviction as to the irreplaceability of literary form. While we might not have agreed on every single issue – as is always the case on the Left – we in “Praktyka Teoretyczna” are proud to have called him not just an inspiration, but a comrade. Uniłowski passed away while putting finishing touches to the essay we’re presenting below. Unfortunately, he never managed to send us the finished abstract/summary for this article, so it falls to us to try and summarise its main theses. Krzysztof Uniłowski passed away earlier this December. For the last twenty years, he has been crucial to Polish literary studies. Writing on a broad range of topics – from reviews of contemporary Polish novels to essays on the idea of modernity, from class-oriented analyses of sci-fi books and TV shows to comments on the politics and ethics of literary criticism – he developed an impressive and highly unique critical perspective, or indeed: a unique language of criticism, one that has managed and will undoubtedly still manage to inspire countless critics of all generations. Throughout his work, Uniłowski drew heavily on historical materialism, constantly balancing his instinctive focus on the political – and, specifically, on class – with his equally instinctive conviction as to the irreplaceability of literary form. While we might not have agreed on every single issue – as is always the case on the Left – we in “Praktyka Teoretyczna” are proud to have called him not just an inspiration, but a comrade. Uniłowski passed away while putting finishing touches to the essay we’re presenting below. Unfortunately, he never managed to send us the finished abstract/summary for this article, so it falls to us to try and summarise its main theses.Krzysztof Uniłowski passed away earlier this December. For the last twenty years, he has been crucial to Polish literary studies. Writing on a broad range of topics – from reviews of contemporary Polish novels to essays on the idea of modernity, from class-oriented analyses of sci-fi books and TV shows to comments on the politics and ethics of literary criticism – he developed an impressive and highly unique critical perspective, or indeed: a unique language of criticism, one that has managed and will undoubtedly still manage to inspire countless critics of all generations. Throughout his work, Uniłowski drew heavily on historical materialism, constantly balancing his instinctive focus on the political – and, specifically, on class – with his equally instinctive conviction as to the irreplaceability of literary form. While we might not have agreed on every single issue – as is always the case on the Left– we in “Praktyka Teoretyczna” are proud to have called him not just an inspiration, but a comrade. Uniłowski passed away while putting finishing touches to the essay we’re presenting below. Unfortunately, he never managed to send us the finished abstract/summary for this article, so it falls to us to try and summarise its main theses. The issues raised in this erudite and formally complex piece include such fundamental questions as: in what sense do the fictional worlds resemble the non-fictional one, and how do we inhabit them? What’s the relationship between immersion and interpretation? What real-life figures can help us imagine or visualise our intimate yet inherently social relationship with the fictional (are we guests, dwellers, passersby...)? Uniłowski looks for answers in contemporary Marxist criticism (Eagleton, Jameson, Berardi), sci-fi and fantasy writing (Lem, Sapkowski, Martin), as well as modern continental philoso phy (Gadamer, Heidegger) and – in the last part of the essay – contemporary game studies. We’re happy to be able to present Uniłowski’s piece in two versions, the original Polish as well as its English translation (by Jakob Ziguras). In order to preserve the unmistakable flow of Uniłowski’s thought in English, small changes were introduced – with the author’s full approval – in the English version. We trust that our Polish-speaking readers will fin the comparison of the two versions interesting and instruc tive, as they seem to give a unique insight into Uniłowski’s writing process.