Academic literature on the topic 'Stoppard, Tom. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are dead'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Stoppard, Tom. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are dead.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Stoppard, Tom. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are dead"
Kazemi, Elham, and Mohsen Hanif. "Spatial Politics in Tom Stoppard’s Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead." Ilha do Desterro A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies 70, no. 1 (January 27, 2017): 287. http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2175-8026.2017v70n1p287.
Full textSklizkova, Tina A. "The notions "Englishness" and "Russianess" in Tom Stoppard's fi lm "Anna Karenina"." Vestnik of Kostroma State University, no. 2 (2019): 195–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.34216/1998-0817-2019-25-2-195-199.
Full textZaslavskii, Oleg B. "Маленький человек в неевклидовом мире: о художественном пространстве в фильме и пьесе Т. Стоппарда “Розенкранц и Гильденстерн мертвы ”." Sign Systems Studies 33, no. 2 (December 31, 2005): 343–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/sss.2005.33.2.05.
Full textMoosavinia, Sayyed Rahim, and Fatemeh Raeisi. "“Stark Raving Sane”: A Deconstructionist Reading of Tom Stoppard’s Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead." Anafora 8, no. 1 (2021): 187–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.29162/anafora.v8i1.10.
Full textÜlker Erkan, Ayça Berna. "Humour and Fate in Tom Stoppard's Play Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead." Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute 2016, no. 50 (2016): 74–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.5505/pausbed.2016.20092.
Full textŞENTÜRK UZUN, NESLİHAN. "HAUNTOLOGICAL CRISES OF IDENTITY, MEMORY, AND PERSONAL HISTORY IN TOM STOPPARD S ROSENCRANTZ AND GUILDENSTERN ARE DEAD." Modernism and Postmodernism Studies Network 2, no. 1 (September 25, 2021): 110–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.47333/modernizm.2021171849.
Full textMostafalou, Abouzar, and Hossein Moradi. "Persistence of Baroque Trauerspiel in Tom Stoppard’s Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead as a Postmodern Literature: Rejection of Metanarrative." Journal of Language Teaching and Research 8, no. 2 (March 1, 2017): 322. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0802.14.
Full textEKLER, Onur, and Razan Sayed Ali. "The Literary Evocation of Loeb’s Theory of Universe in Tom Stoppard’s Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead." International Journal of Language Academy 43, no. 43 (2022): 177–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/ijla.64936.
Full textStrang, Ronald W. "Bareham, T. ed., Tom Stoppard: Rosencrantz and Guildenstem are Dead; Jumpers; Travesties. A Casebook; Delaney, P., Tom Stoppard: The Moral Vision of the Major Plays." Notes and Queries 39, no. 2 (June 1, 1992): 242–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nq/39.2.242.
Full textAbramovskikh, Elena Valerievna, Sof`ya Mikhailovna Pasashkova, and Mariya Aleksandrovna Smolenskaya. "THE ISSUES OF META-NARRATIVE STRUCTURE IN TOM STOPPARD’S PLAY AND FILM <i>ROSENCRANTZ AND GUILDENSTERN ARE DEAD</i>." Sphere of Culture, no. 2 (2022): 25–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.48164/2713-301x_2022_8_25.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Stoppard, Tom. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are dead"
Holden, Martin Lee Castleberry Marion. "A director's approach to Tom Stoppard's Rosencrantz & Guildenstern are dead." Waco, Tex. : Baylor University, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/2104/5064.
Full textPritzker, Elaine C. "Tom Stoppard: Humanizing Chaos." FIU Digital Commons, 2011. http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/401.
Full textLin, Po-chen, and 林柏辰. "The Postmodernist Strategies in Tom Stoppard''s Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead, Jumpers, and The Real Thing." Thesis, 2004. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/12247160873328659161.
Full text中國文化大學
英國語文學研究所
93
Tom Stoppard adopts a lot of postmodernist techniques in creating his works. The aim of this thesis is to examine postmodernist strategies which Stoppard uses in his three plays. Chapter One begins with a short biography of Stoppard, and then introduces the features of postmodernism and the differences between modernism and postmodernism. While modernists exhibit anxiety and a sense of loss because of the destruction of the faith in the Western civilization, postmodernists exhibit the uncertainty and the decentering. Postmodernists usually use a lot of parody and collage in their works. Stoppard uses parody to subvert the convention and the classics and to give the audience the new perspective of human beings. Chapter Two deals with Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead. The intertextuality of this play is obvious. Stoppard puts two minor characters from Shakespeare’s Hamlet into a Beckettian world of Waiting for Godot. The setting of this play is divided into two different worlds﹘the medieval and the contemporary. The context of this play continuously interlaces with that of Hamlet. Stoppard wants to reveal the powerful control of the author in a play and reveals the theatricalization in this play. Chapter Three deals with Jumpers. Stoppard uses two opposite philosophical theories﹘logical positivism and altruism﹘to express his farcical, conflicting and, dialectical ideas. The uncertainty, which is one feature of postmodernist works, is prevailing in this play. The setting is not a complete one, but is split into two conflicting areas. This feature is one kind of postmodernist strategies. Stoppard also presents the postmodern situation of the marriage relationship and that of human relations. Chapter Four deals with The Real Thing. Stoppard attempts to explore “the real thing” in the way of debating and discusses this issue in three perspectives: love, writing, and politics. This play contains four plays-within-the-play, and is also related to other literary works. The intertextuality is a prominent feature of this play. The structure of this play, which interlaces fictional scenes and real scenes, functions as two mirrors which mirror, echo and contrast with each other. Chapter Five is the Conclusion. Stoppard attempts to convey his idea in his plays through the postmodernist devices or strategies. However, evidently, he is influenced by modernism a lot. Therefore, he is the crossover between modernism and postmodernism, and between tradition and innovation.
Teng, An-ni, and 鄧安妮. "Misreading Tom Stoppard: Alienation Effect and Intertextuality in His Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead and Dogg's Hamlet, Cahoot's Macbeth." Thesis, 2005. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/39515437898549487853.
Full text國立中興大學
外國語文學系
93
This thesis deals with the issues of misreading, alienation effect and intertextuality in Tom Stoppard’s Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead and Dogg’s Hamlet, Cahoot’s Macbeth. By interpreting Stoppard’s plays with the idea of alienation effect and intertextuality, his plays would reveal the gap in Harold Bloom’s idea of misprision. Chapter One is to illustrate the theoretical basis of Bloom’s misreading, Bertolt Brecht’s alienation effect and Roland Barthes’s intertextual concept, and explain the relationship of three theories. Chapter Two discusses Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead and Dogg’s Hamlet, Cahoot’s Macbeth in terms of Brecht’s alienation effect. In this discussion, the concept of alienation effect is related to Barthes’s intertextual approach, by which Bloom’s idea of misprision reveals its gap. The gap means that Stoppard’s plays real the idea of misprision even though Stoppard does not follow Bloom’s six strategies of misprision. Chapter Three tries to deal with Stoppard’s plays with Barthes’s intertextual approach. Parody and metatheatre are other concepts used to further illustrate the intertextual approach in Stoppard’s plays in order to make the intertextual approach in Chapter Three more integrated. Conclusion aims to illustrate the shortages in my thesis, my attempt to interpret Bloom’s concept in different aspects, and my ideal writerly texts which would produce the alienation effect.
Liao, Fei-Pi, and 廖非比. "Tom Stoppard’s Doubleness: Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead, Hapgood, and The Invention of Love." Thesis, 2006. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/90721544383872978727.
Full textLin, Chih-chung, and 林志忠. "Intertextuality, Parody and Meta-art in Tom Stoppard's Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead and Travesties." Thesis, 1999. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/57121897191411881797.
Full text國立臺灣大學
外國語文學系研究所
87
Abstract This thesis aims to discuss the issues of intertextuality, parody and meta-art in Stoppard's theater by analyzing Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead and Travesties. Parody is without doubt a motley form, incorporating various texts; parodists also become conscious of the self-reflexive manner in manipulating the used materials, which resurges as the dominant concern of postmodern parody. Parody is not a literary parasite, but a re-interpretation of the past. By analyzing the two selected plays which serve to illustrate the Stoppardian conventions, we may better appreciate the seemingly chaotic design in Stoppard's theater. Introduction is to delineate the disparate concepts of intertextuality and the relationship between parody and self-conscious literature. Chapter One attempts to sketch the relationship between Shakespeare's Hamlet, Beckett's Waiting for Godot and Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead. In his misreading of the giant precursor, Stoppard re-characterizes the monolithic figure Hamlet and the two insignificant courtiers, and resituates them in the Beckettian world where we reach a new understanding of the original and the later plays. Chapter Two discusses Travesties, which is inextricably related to Oscar Wilde's The Importance of Being Earnest. Stoppard, however, replaces the Wildean content with a serious contemplation on the aesthetic-political subject matters. The divergent values of aestheticism are claimed and counter-claimed by James Joyce (advocator of high modernism), Tristan Tzara (leader of anti-establishment) and V. I. Lenin (enthusiastic partisan of Marxism). Chapter Three tries to deal with the different meta-discursive aspects in parody of the plays. In Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead, Stoppard puts his play on the blurred precinct between art and life; spectators and audience; theatricality and reality. In Travesties, Stoppard shifts his critical concerns to the questioning of the authenticity of history. The discussion will focus on Henry Carr, a self-contradictory and unreliable narrator, whose fragmentary memory is tainted with distortion. Conclusion aims to problematize the difficulty of defining parody. At the same time, it will briefly introduce Stoppard's later works which demonstrate the parodic characteristics.
Books on the topic "Stoppard, Tom. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are dead"
Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are dead. London, England: Penguin Books, 1988.
Find full textBirmingham Public Libraries. Language and Literature Department. Tom Stoppard: 'Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are dead'. Birmingham: B.P.L., 1987.
Find full textSales, Roger. Tom Stoppard: Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are dead. West Drayton: Penguin, 1988.
Find full textHunter, Jim. Tom Stoppard: Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are dead, Jumpers, Travesties, Arcadia. London: Faber, 2000.
Find full textTom Stoppard: Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are dead, Jumpers, Travesties, Arcadia. London: Faber and Faber, 2000.
Find full textPlayers, Shakespeare Institute. Tom Stoppard's Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are dead. [Stratford-upon-Avon]: Shakespeare Institute, 1999.
Find full textProductions, Vanessa Ford. Vanessa Ford Productions presents a national tour of 'Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are dead' by Tom Stoppard. and 'Macbeth' by William Shakespeare. [G.B.]: Vanessa Ford Productions, 1989.
Find full textTony, Bareham, ed. Tom Stoppard: Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are dead, Jumpers, Travesties : a casebook. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1990.
Find full textParry, P. H. York Notes on Tom Stoppard's "Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead". Longman, 1991.
Find full textCampos, Liliane. ‘Wheels have been set in motion’: Geocentrism and Relativity in Tom Stoppard’s Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead. Edinburgh University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474427814.003.0012.
Full textBook chapters on the topic "Stoppard, Tom. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are dead"
Glomb, Stefan. "Stoppard, Tom: Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead." In Kindlers Literatur Lexikon (KLL), 1–2. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05728-0_17171-1.
Full textMancewicz, Aneta. "Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead, Tom Stoppard." In Adaptation in Theatre and Performance, 45–69. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96806-9_3.
Full textScott, Michael. "Parasitic Comedy: Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead." In Shakespeare and the Modern Dramatist, 13–27. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13340-6_2.
Full textDelaney, Paul. "Through a Glass Darkly: Mortality and the Outer Mystery in Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead." In Tom Stoppard, 14–35. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20603-2_2.
Full textGordon, Robert. "Stoppard and the Critics." In Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead, Jumpers and The Real Thing, 42–46. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09381-6_5.
Full textGordon, Robert. "George vs the Logical Positivists: Stoppard on Philosophy." In Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead, Jumpers and The Real Thing, 21–28. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09381-6_3.
Full textGordon, Robert. "Plays Within Plays: Stoppard on Hamlet and Waiting for Godot." In Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead, Jumpers and The Real Thing, 9–17. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09381-6_1.
Full textMoriarty, Julia. "Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead by Tom Stoppard." In How to Teach a Play. Methuen Drama, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781350017566.ch-079.
Full text"Appendix 1: Hamlet vs Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead." In Tom Stoppard’s Plays, 585–603. Brill | Rodopi, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004319653_010.
Full text"Stoppard On His Own Art And Practice." In Tom Stoppard: Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead, Jumpers and Travesties. Bloomsbury Academic, 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781350388024.0009.
Full text