Academic literature on the topic 'Stylistic'

The article analyzes the concept of “stylistic competence”, which is defined as the ability to learn the stylistic system of the language at the phonetic, lexical-semantic, phraseological and grammatical levels. The main concepts of stylistics have been clarified. The object and subject of studying stylistics have been characterized. Such sections of stylistics as stylistics of language, stylistics of speech and stylistics of fiction have been studied. The concept of “language style” and “speech style” has been distinguished. The problem of compliance with stylistic norms and features of formation of stylistic abilities and skills has been outlined. The linguistic-didactic system for the formation of students’ stylistic competence has been defined, which includes: approaches to learning (functional-stylistic, which ensures effective work on the representation of the features of the functioning of language units, their implementation in each style; the formation of fluency in speaking skills), learning patterns (patterns of language learning and patterns of speech learning); teaching principles (general didactic and linguistic didactic); groups of exercises (according to the content of the main material, according to the method of execution) and specific methods (observation of stylistic functions of language units, stylistic experiment; stylistic editing; stylistic construction).

Abstract Over recent years, the use of corpora in stylistic analysis has grown in popularity. However, questions still remain over the remit of corpus stylistics, its distinction from corpus linguistics generally and its capacity to explain complex stylistic effects. This article argues in favour of an integrated corpus stylistics; that is, an approach to corpus stylistics that integrates it with other stylistic methods and analytical frameworks. I suggest that this approach is needed for two main reasons: (i) it is analytically necessary in order to fully explain stylistic effects in texts, and (ii) integrating corpus methods with other stylistic tools is what will distinguish corpus stylistics from corpus linguistics. My argument is supported by reference to examples from Mark Haddon’s no vel The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time and the HBO TV series Deadwood. Both these examples rely for their explanation on a combination of corpus stylistic analytical techniques and other stylistic methods of analysis.

The stylistics are based on the concepts of tropes and figures. Embellishments of speech have been considered and analyzed since antiquity. In this direction, the works of many orators, philosophers and stylists are known (Theophrastus, Aristotle, Demetrius, Cicero, Quintilian, etc.). In linguistics, stylistic devices are studied in detail, but it analyzes how stylistic devices were translated into the Kyrgyz language containing information about English culture and history, what which correspond to the Kyrgyz culture in the tragedy of the great English writer W. Shakespeare "Richard 3".

The article is devoted to the study of the evolution of stylistic devices in scientific research and the birth of stylistics. The methodological base consists of general scientific methods: analysis, synthesis and generalization of information from historical sources and practical research of scientists in stylistics and rhetoric. The analysis revealed that stylistic devices, as an efficient and impactful way of expressing thoughts and influencing the audience, contributed to the emergence of such a science as stylistics. The main sources of stylistics were the national language, dialects, classical and modern literature, works of artists, and mass media. The theoretical basis for the development of stylistics was rhetoric, linguistics, psychology and logic. Stylistics can be broadly defined as the linguistic science of the means of expression and the regularities of the functioning of language, determined by the most appropriate use of language units in the text, depending on the content of the statement, goals, situation and sphere of communication. The article also considers the issue of classification of stylistic devices in modern domestic and foreign linguistics. Due to the diversity and multifacet nature of this issue in modern stylistics, there is a certain variety of approaches to the classification of stylistic devices. Depending on the focus of the analysis, researchers distinguish: lexical-grammatical, rhetorical, discursive-pragmatic, functional-stylistic classifications, as well as the classification of emotional language, stylistic figures and stylistic techniques. In the English-speaking tradition, stylistic devices are classified by the type of influence on the target audience: logos, pathos, ethos, and kairos. Another approach involves the division of rhetorical figures into 3 diverse groups: sound-related, order-related and meaning-related.

Lexical stylistics is one of the main sections of stylistics, which studies the stylistic expressiveness of words. They also differ in lexicological and semantic stylistics. When studying the vocabulary of each language, it is necessary to determine the expressive role and stylistic coloring of different words. Different linguists were interested in the lexical stylistics of the Armenian language. Many of them have written both monographs and articles. Studies are still ongoing. Stylistic studies of vocabulary, as the most rapidly changing part of language, can bring new linguistic realities to light. They can refer to the direct and figurative meanings of words, the expressive possibilities of words belonging to exfoliation of lexicon, the stylistic value of colloquial, idiomatic, dialectal words, vulgarism, barbarism, as well as word usage, and various related issues. The article presents the basic problems of development of lexical stylistics (from the 1950s to the present day). We examined the semantic groups and exfoliation of lexicon based on S. Melkonyan and S. Eloyan's stylistic classifications and explained the stylistic analysis. We have studied the works written about lexical stylistics of the Armenian language, analyzed the provisions in various researches. The methodological basis is the combination of existing theoretical provisions.

This article offers an analytical review of the Department of Stylistics, Culture of Language, and Sociolinguistics’ study outcomes in 1991—2021. It focuses on the publications with the expanded linguo-stylistic analysis and the developing of the terminological system of Ukrainian stylistics. The authors reinterpret a term style and concept of language culture and outline the contribution to the development of structural stylistics, i.e., linguistic text analysis, and interpretive stylistics from the Department staff also naming major studies which determined the connection of linguistic stylistics with the history of Standard Ukrainian and establishing the significant role of historical stylistics. Being determined by the view of language as a system of signs the structural approach in linguistic stylistics dominated at early stages the Ukrainian stylistics formation. The paper advances a new idea regarding the fluidity of the modern system of functional styles and the need to revise and restructure their socially significant hierarchy with respect to the linguo-cultural and communicative-pragmatic reinterpretation of integrative linguo-stylistics. The interdisciplinary aspects of functional-stylistic and genre-stylistic researches are the following: linguoculturology, linguofolkloristics, linguosophy, linguopersonology, linguoconflictology, discourseology, media stylistics, legal linguistics, psycholinguistics, ethnolinguistics, and linguistic expertise. The conclusion evaluates the digital methods to process texts in Standard Ukrainian and the need to create lexicographic sources of stylistic terminology and expand the aspects of stylistic lexicography. Keywords: linguo-stylistics, style, culture of language, norm, interdisciplinarity, research method, integrative linguo-stylistics

In society, the word criticism has always been considered a negative attitude in literature, its meaning is different. Interpretation and explanation of any work of art is not criticism. Just as Urdu literature has developed a lot, criticism has also introduced new trends, one of the branches of linguistics is stylistics. The word style is not new in literature. Writing style for it. Words like language and statement are taken as synonyms. Stylistic criticism is objective and analytical. In which the phonetics of the author's style of writing. Semantic. Syntactic and lexical reviewIt is taken so that the value and dignity of this writing can be properly estimated.

The modern school of Ukrainian linguistic stylistics produces new approaches, formulates new theoretical positions, generates current, relevant directions of research, marks the latest ideas in the field of linguistic stylistic studies, which testifies to the significant achievements of the national linguistic stylistic scientific school in the world continuum. Ukrainian scientists, noting the change in the scientific paradigm of linguistic-stylistic research, direct attention to the integrative approach in modern linguistic-stylistics as a field of scientific knowledge. Justifying integrative approaches to the definition of the main categories of stylistics and style, pointing out the need to use new methods of interpreting artistic texts, they emphasize the role of linguistic stylistics in the education of linguistic personality. The proven emergence of stylistic research into a wider range of linguistic, literary, folkloristic, cultural, social and communication topics is dictated by the scientific and educational demands of our time. At the time of integration of linguistic stylistics with oral folk literature – a linguistic oral lexicologist. Linguistics is the science of language styles, varieties, forms of speech, language means of all levels. Linguistic oral verbal science studies the language of folklore works. Today, in stylistics, the question of the independence of the folk language style remains unsolved. There is an opinion that folklore can be qualified as a separate type of artistic style or, more broadly, as a separate functional style of literary language. The proven influence of the language of oral creativity on the development of the stylistic system of the Ukrainian language (the selection of colorful and stylistic varieties of the language). In linguistic stylistics, folk songs have been established as a stylistic category. The doctrine of linguistic and aesthetic signs of Ukrainian culture (S.Ya. Yermolenko) also appeals to the depths of the language of oral folk creativity. Connections of linguistic oral word science with all sections of stylistics are observed. The use of stylistic terminology in the process of analyzing the language of texts of oral folk literature is evidenced. The influence of oral folk literature on the development of the artistic style of the Ukrainian language is undeniable.

Abstract: This article discusses stylistic peculiarities of Herbert Bates stories. In addition, the specific stylistic features encountered in his works are analyzed separately. Special aspects of the works are cited using examples. Keywords: language, stylistics, style, stylistic devices, syntactic, coloring.

This article introduces the special issue. In it, we argue that research into reader response should be recognised as a vital aspect of contemporary stylistics, and we establish our focus on work which explicitly investigates such responses through the collection and analysis of extra-textual datasets. Reader response research in stylistics is characterised by a commitment to rigorous and evidence-based approaches to the study of readers’ interactions with and around texts, and the application of such datasets in the service of stylistic concerns, to contribute to stylistic textual analysis and/or wider discussion of stylistic theory and methods. We trace the influence of reader response criticism and reception theory on stylistics and discuss the productive dialogues which exist between stylistics and the related fields of the empirical study of literature and naturalistic study of reading. After offering an overview of methods available to reader response researchers and a contextualising survey of existing work, we argue that both experimental and naturalistic methods should be regarded as ‘empirical’, and that stylistics is uniquely positioned to embrace diverse approaches to readers and reading. We summarise contributions to the special issue and the valuable insights they offer into the historical context of reader response research and the way readers perceive and evaluate texts (either poetry or narrative prose). Stylistic reader response research enables both the testing and development of stylistic methods, in accordance with the progressive spirit of the discipline, and also the establishment of new and renewed connections between stylistic research and work in other fields.