Relevant bibliographies by topics / Supreme Court of the US

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters
  5. Conference papers
  6. Reports

Academic literature on the topic 'Supreme Court of the US'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 1 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Supreme Court of the US.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Supreme Court of the US"

1

Roylance, Stephen M. "US Supreme Court further strengthens IPR’s." Journal of Generic Medicines: The Business Journal for the Generic Medicines Sector 16, no. 4 (November 5, 2020): 171–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1741134320962532.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

&NA;, &NA;. "US SUPREME COURT RULES ON GRAMMRUDMAN." Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing 13, no. 6 (November 1986): 23A. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00152192-198611000-00013.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Jaffe, Susan. "US Supreme Court upholds ACA subsidies." Lancet 386, no. 9988 (July 2015): 16–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(15)61187-4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

LE MON, CHRISTOPHER J. "Post-Avena Application of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations by United States Courts." Leiden Journal of International Law 18, no. 2 (June 2005): 215–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s092215650500261x.

Full text
Abstract:
Following the judgment of the International Court of Justice in the Avena case, US courts have had a mixed record in applying the decision domestically. In this article, I examine the treatment by US courts of claims by criminal defendants alleging Vienna Convention violations, subsequent to the Avena judgment. First, I discuss the two limited decisions so far taken by the US Supreme Court regarding the Vienna Convention, and briefly explain several of the judicially-created rules that have prevented most US courts from reaching the merits of Vienna Convention claims. Next, I analyse the ICJ judgment in the LaGrand case, and provide an overview of the reception of that case by the US courts. After a summary of the Avena decision, I turn to the latest cases in which Vienna Convention claims based on Avena have been raised in US courts, focusing on the two most important decisions, and examining their contradictory rulings. As the US Supreme Court has now decided to hear an appeal in one of these cases, I conclude by arguing that the Supreme Court should take the opportunity to elucidate the role of the International Court of Justice in US law when the United States has consented to binding treaty interpretation by that court.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Songer, Donald R., John Szmer, and Susan W. Johnson. "Explaining Dissent on the Supreme Court of Canada." Canadian Journal of Political Science 44, no. 2 (June 2011): 389–409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0008423911000151.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract.While there is an extensive literature on the causes of dissensus on appellate courts in the US, few empirical studies exist of the causes of dissent in Canadian Supreme Court. The current study seeks to close that gap in the literature, proposing and then testing what we call a Canadian model of dissent. We find that the likelihood of dissent is strongly related to four broad factors that appear to exert independent influence on whether the Court is consensual or divided: political conflict, institutional structure, legal ambiguity in the law and variations in the leadership style of the chief justice.Résumé.Les causes de dissension dans les cours d'appel aux États-Unis font l'objet de nombreux articles et publications, mais il existe très peu d'études empiriques sur les causes de dissidence à la Cour suprême du Canada. La présente étude vise à combler cette lacune en proposant, un modèle canadien de dissension, puis en le mettant à l'épreuve. Nous avons constaté que le risque de dissension est fortement lié à quatre facteurs genéraux qui semblent exercer une influence indépendante, que la Cour soit en accord ou divisée. Ces facteurs sont le conflit politique, la structure institutionnelle, la présence d'une ambiguité juridique dans la loi et le style de direction du juge en chef.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Zeisberg, Mariah. "Should We Elect the US Supreme Court?" Perspectives on Politics 7, no. 4 (December 2009): 785–803. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1537592709991800.

Full text
Abstract:
Extensive political science research reveals that the decisions of the US Supreme Court are deeply political. And both advocates and critics of judicial elections concede that partisan elections are a democratic method of judicial selection. Does the value of democratic representation mean that US Supreme Court Justices should be selected through partisan elections? I argue not. Partisan judicial elections are actually far poorer institutional mechanisms for capturing the judgment of the people on legal matters than has been recognized. The role of parties in structuring a campaign distorts the deliberative environment surrounding judicial elections, creating significant barriers to voters expressing a judgment on matters of legal meaning. The kind of distortion is best understood through reference to aprocessualcriterion of deliberative democracy, which provides a fitting normative template to ground theoretical inquiry into the reason-giving possibilities of existing democratic institutions and practices. Hence, answering why the US Supreme Court should not be elected on democratic grounds also reveals new insights about the role of parties in sustaining (or subverting) deliberative democratic ideals.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Jaffe, Susan. "US Supreme Court makes historic health ruling." Lancet 380, no. 9836 (July 2012): 14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61111-8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Jukes, Thomas H. "US Supreme Court to review Louisiana appeal." Nature 324, no. 6096 (December 1986): 423–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/324423a0.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Samuel, Adam. "The US Supreme Court does Kompetenz-Kompetenz." Arbitration International 35, no. 2 (May 16, 2019): 263–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiz007.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract In Henry Schein and New Prime, the US Supreme Court reached two unanimous decisions on arbitration. Both cases in quite different ways gave rise to questions about the original German doctrine or version of Kompetenz-Kompetenz, the ability of the parties to submit by agreement their jurisdictional disputes to arbitration. Each decision, though, contains so much more. In Henry Schein, the court rejected the view that the court could effectively terminate an arbitration by concluding that the right to arbitrate was clearly not there. It required a proper enquiry including an investigation as to whether the AAA Commercial Rules constitute a Kompetenz-Kompetenz agreement. The facts presented suggested a more complex enquiry than that about the arbitrator's jurisdiction and powers. In New Prime, the Court applied the exclusion from the Federal Arbitration Act for employees engaged in interstate commerce to a self-employed lorry driver. It refused to save the clause on the basis on a Kompetenz-Kompetenz agreement or an inherent jurisdiction.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Fox, Jeffrey L. "“Festo” manifesto heard before US Supreme Court." Nature Biotechnology 20, no. 2 (February 2002): 103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt0202-103a.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Supreme Court of the US"

1

Bundzen, Anna. "The United States Supreme Court and the European Court of Justice : A Comparative Study of Compliance." Thesis, Örebro universitet, Akademin för juridik, psykologi och socialt arbete, 2011. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-20655.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper comparatively compares compliance to the rulings of the United States Supreme Court and the ECJ by the state/member state courts. Besides comparing the compliance to the two courts judgements, the paper also tries to establish how to increase compliance with these rulings in the future. This is done because compliance is an important aspect of a functioning judicial system, and a comparison might reveal solutions from one side that could be utilized on the other. The main resources used in this book are: articles, books, webpages and statistics on the subject. The main focus lies on the legal approach, but as a comparative study, elements of political science have been used as well. The results of the comparison show that although statistical compliance is quite high, the actual compliance might be lower due to lack of knowledge or political divisions. Increasing the actual compliance is then a good strategy to be sure that lower courts follow the rulings correctly. The conclusion of this paper is that political and policy divisions in a country, or between an organization and its members results in non- compliance. Reducing this kind of friction will help increase compliance to decisions, not only statistically but also in practice, as the lower courts will feel more comfortable with the rulings. An increase of knowledge of the subject, and the development of efficient judicial mechanisms in a state will also help assure correct interpretation of the rulings.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Winters, Kathleen H. "Motivations for the Use of Concurring Opinions on the U.S. Supreme Court." The Ohio State University, 2011. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1306777128.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Hauser, Astrid. "Der Europäische Gerichtshof und der US Supreme Court eine vergleichende Analyse ausgewählter Aspekte." Frankfurt, M. Berlin Bern Bruxelles New York, NY Oxford Wien Lang, 2007. http://d-nb.info/986335142/04.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Hoff, Stefanie von. "Die Rolle des US-Supreme Court im Prozess der Verfassungsänderung in den Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika." Frankfurt, M. Berlin Bern Bruxelles New York, NY Oxford Wien Lang, 2007. http://d-nb.info/986185817/04.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Dregger, Sebastian [Verfasser]. "Die Verfassungsinterpretation am US-Supreme Court : Begründungen und politische Ausrichtung zwischen "Originalism" und "Living Constitution" / Sebastian Dregger." Baden-Baden : Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, 2019. http://d-nb.info/1192101715/34.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Hübener, Fabian [Verfasser]. "Vertikale Mindestpreisbindungen im US- und EU-Recht : Die Auswirkungen des Leegin-Urteils des U.S. Supreme Court / Fabian Hübener." Baden-Baden : Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, 2016. http://d-nb.info/1106337859/34.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Tober, Tessia [Verfasser]. "Das Bundesverfassungsgericht und der US Supreme Court zur Sicherungsverwahrung gefährlicher, strafrechtlich verantwortlicher Straftäter. : Eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung. / Tessia Tober." Berlin : Duncker & Humblot, 2019. http://d-nb.info/1238442641/34.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Abel, Alexander [Verfasser]. "Der Alien Tort Statute nach der Entscheidung des US-Supreme Court in der Sache Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain : Ein US-amerikanischer Weg zum Schutz der Menschenrechte / Alexander Abel." Aachen : Shaker, 2007. http://d-nb.info/1170527248/34.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Hessel, Tobias J. [Verfasser]. "Ein Vergleich der Eingriffsschwellen im deutschen und US-amerikanischen Recht unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Rechtsprechung des U.S. Supreme Court bei Eingriffen in die Privatsphäre. / Tobias J. Hessel." Berlin : Duncker & Humblot, 2010. http://d-nb.info/1238364667/34.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Oliveira, Junior Jorge Ferraz de. "ATIVISMO JUDICIAL (OU JURÍDICO), AUTOCONTENÇÃO E ÚLTIMA PALAVRA NA INTERPRETAÇÃO DA CONSTITUIÇÃO: O que o Supremo Tribunal Federal pode aprender com o ativismo judicial norte-americano e as teorias do diálogo." Universidade Federal do Maranhão, 2014. http://tedebc.ufma.br:8080/jspui/handle/tede/654.

Full text
Abstract:
Made available in DSpace on 2016-08-18T12:54:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 DISSERTACAO_JORGE FERRAZ DE OLIVEIRA JUNIOR.pdf: 775239 bytes, checksum: 807e822b6702aee8818a57787af9b4be (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-12-12
This dissertation, based on the investigation of the "emergence" of judicial activism expression s arrising, on pendulous phases between judicial activism and self-restraint of American Supreme Court s jurisprudence, on dialogue s theories and on the contribution of many authors who advocate the adoption of a Constitution s constructive and moral interpretation, aims to demonstrate two theses about the judicial activism s limits and who should have the last word at Constitution s interpretation. The first one, refered to the idea of, in not being in a case of fundamental rights guarantee, protection of minorities and the unblocking of access channels to political power, the Supreme Court should adopt a selfrestraint posture, preferring decisions that encourage the Legislature to exercise its prerrogatives provided by the Constitution. Cases in which the democratic process will be strengthened, through a greater accountability of elected representatives before the true holder of sovereignty: the people. The second one, that there is no definitive last word (but only temporary) at Constitution s interpretation and that the legislative activism, when exercised to confirm or even to contest a Supreme Court s decision, far from meaning a crisis between the powers, may serve to strengthen the democratic process, increasing the possibility of providing more correct answers to especific constitutional problem.
A dissertação, partindo da investigação da emergência da expressão ativismo judicial , das fases pendulares entre ativismo judicial e autocontenção na jurisprudência da Suprema Corte Norte-Americana, das teorias do diálogo e do contributo de diversos autores que preconizam a adoção de uma interpretação construtiva e moral da Constituição, pretende demonstrar duas teses concernentes aos limites do ativismo judicial e quanto a quem deve dar a última palavra na interpretação da Constituição. A primeira, a de que se não se está em um caso de garantia de direitos fundamentais, proteção de minorias e de desobstrução dos canais de acesso ao poder político, a Suprema Corte deve adotar uma postura autorrestritiva, preferindo decisões que instiguem o Poder Legislativo a exercer as prerrogativas previstas na Constituição. Casos em que o processo democrático resultará fortalecido, mediante a maior responsabilização dos representantes eleitos perante o verdadeiro titular da soberania: o povo. A segunda, a de que não há última palavra definitiva (mas apenas provisória) na interpretação da Constituição e que o ativismo legislativo, quando exercido para corroborar ou até mesmo para contestar uma decisão da Corte Suprema, longe de significar uma crise entre os poderes, pode servir para fortalecer o processo democrático, aumentando a possibilidade de fornecimento de respostas mais corretas a dado problema constitucional.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Supreme Court of the US"

1

Nelson, Garrison, Maggie Steakley, and James Montague. Pathways to the US Supreme Court. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137351722.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Us Supreme Court Transcript Of Record Us. Gale, U.S. Supreme Court Records, 2011.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

US Supreme Court Cases and Comments. Matthew Bender and Company Inc, 1997.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

File, Facts on. Supreme Court & Evolving Constitutionc/Win/Us. Facts on File, 1996.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

US Supreme Court Transcript of Record US V Patrick. Gale, U.S. Supreme Court Records, 2011.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Fix, Michael P., and Benjamin J. Kassow. US Supreme Court Doctrine in the State High Courts. Cambridge University Press, 2020.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Fix, Michael P., and Benjamin J. Kassow. US Supreme Court Doctrine in the State High Courts. Cambridge University Press, 2020.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Us Supreme Court Transcript Of Record Helvering. Gale, U.S. Supreme Court Records, 2011.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Us Supreme Court Transcript Of Record Bergere. Gale, U.S. Supreme Court Records, 2011.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Us Supreme Court Transcript Of Record Mcdonald. Gale, U.S. Supreme Court Records, 2011.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Supreme Court of the US"

1

Costello, Robert, and Colleen Eren. "The US Supreme Court." In The Impact of Supreme Court Decisions on US Institutions, 5–18. New York: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003021438-2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Nelson, Garrison, Maggie Steakley, and James Montague. "Building Supreme Courts." In Pathways to the US Supreme Court, 7–46. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137351722_2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Nelson, Garrison, Maggie Steakley, and James Montague. "Introduction: Whither the Supreme Court?" In Pathways to the US Supreme Court, 1–6. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137351722_1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Nelson, Garrison, Maggie Steakley, and James Montague. "Presidential Court Changers." In Pathways to the US Supreme Court, 187–222. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137351722_7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Nelson, Garrison, Maggie Steakley, and James Montague. "Court Paths and Confirmation Patterns." In Pathways to the US Supreme Court, 77–111. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137351722_4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Gadbin-George, Geraldine. "UK Supreme Court Versus US Supreme Court: Modern Use of Magna Carta." In The Rights and Aspirations of the Magna Carta, 39–63. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42733-1_3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Nelson, Garrison, Maggie Steakley, and James Montague. "How Courts Change." In Pathways to the US Supreme Court, 157–86. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137351722_6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Nelson, Garrison, Maggie Steakley, and James Montague. "The Arena and the Monastery: Four Career Paths to the Supreme Court." In Pathways to the US Supreme Court, 47–75. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137351722_3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Nelson, Garrison, Maggie Steakley, and James Montague. "From Consensus to Conflict, 1937–2010." In Pathways to the US Supreme Court, 113–55. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137351722_5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Nelson, Garrison, Maggie Steakley, and James Montague. "Stormy Weather Ahead." In Pathways to the US Supreme Court, 223–41. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137351722_8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Supreme Court of the US"

1

Sanchez, George. "Using Unlabeled Data for US Supreme Court Case Classification." In 2020 International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW). IEEE, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icdmw51313.2020.00116.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Aleven, Vincent, Kevin D. Ashley, and Collin Lynch. "Helping law students to understand US Supreme Court oral arguments." In the 10th international conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1165485.1165494.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Douglas, Garrath. "“I Know It When I See It”: Where to Look for Social License." In 2014 10th International Pipeline Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/ipc2014-33599.

Full text
Abstract:
It has become axiomatic that a social license is a critical success factor for Canadian pipelines. Regulators may permit a pipeline, but on-the-ground consent for a project is a function of communities. Social license is an intangible quality outside of formal regulation, occupying the gap between community expectations and existing laws. Increasingly, gaining social license is seen as an important aspect of managing environmental and social risks, and the presence or absence of social license affects project budgets, timelines, corporate reputation and even project outcomes. There are regulatory risks to not demonstrating social license; and even with regulatory approval social license may be the difference between legal challenges and none. Social license is not easy to find, is difficult to measure, and is capricious and dynamic in nature. It is an inherently vague and changeable standard that means different things to different people. Simply defining social license can be a futile enterprise: as with US Supreme Court Justice Stewart’s famous 1964 judgment, we can’t neatly define social license, but we know it when we see it. The emergence of social media has meant that communities are better engaged, informed, and networked than ever before. Gaining social license happens when trust is built, earned and maintained with communities: it can take a long time to build that trust, and today’s digital citizen expects engagement across many platforms in order for that trust to be maintained. Though there is no ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach to gaining social license, the approach of this paper is to lay out a case-study roadmap for navigating towards it by building relationships, countering misinformation, and mobilizing existing support. The paper will also recognize potential wrong turns such as inattention to social media, lack of transparency or a clear message, and the mistaken belief that regulatory approval is the only approval necessary.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Ashley, Kevin, Niels Pinkwart, Collin Lynch, and Vincent Aleven. "Learning by diagramming Supreme Court oral arguments." In the 11th international conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1276318.1276370.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Zein, Fitriyani, Alfitra, Aminudin Yakub, Mu’min Roup, and Dewi Angggraini. "Indonesian Supreme Court Judicial Decision on Sharia Economic Disputes." In International Conference Recent Innovation. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0009925312181223.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

"The Indian Supreme Court Investiture in the World Rainbow." In International Conference on Law, Management and Humanities. International Centre of Economics, Humanities and Management, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.15242/icehm.ed0614016.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Jilkine, Vladimir. "THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NE BIS IN IDEM-PRINCIPLE IN THE SUPREME COURT AND THE SUPREME ADMINISTRATIVE COURT OF FINLAND CONCERNING TAX FRAUD." In SGEM 2014 Scientific SubConference on POLITICAL SCIENCES, LAW, FINANCE, ECONOMICS AND TOURISM. Stef92 Technology, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2014/b21/s5.114.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Rissland, E. L. "Dimension-based analysis of hypotheticals from supreme court oral argument." In the second international conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/74014.74030.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Liu, Chao-Lin, and Kuan-Chun Chen. "Extracting the Gist of Chinese Judgments of the Supreme Court." In ICAIL '19: Seventeenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3322640.3326715.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Rosfiana, Rosfiana, and Evita Israhadi. "Legal Protection of State Assets in the Supreme Court (MA)." In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Law, Social Science, Economics, and Education, ICLSSEE 2021, March 6th 2021, Jakarta, Indonesia. EAI, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.6-3-2021.2306855.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Reports on the topic "Supreme Court of the US"

1

Rissland, Edwina L. Dimension-Based Analysis of Hypotheticals from Supreme Court Oral Argument. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, October 1987. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada249336.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Dave, Dhaval, Andrew Friedson, Kyutaro Matsuzawa, Drew McNichols, and Joseph Sabia. Did the Wisconsin Supreme Court Restart a COVID-19 Epidemic? Evidence from a Natural Experiment. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, June 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w27322.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Garrett, A. Bowen, and Sherry Glied. The Effect of U.S. Supreme Court Ruling Sullivan v. Zebley on Child SSI and AFDC Enrollment. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, August 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w6125.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

McMahon, Adam. From Blooming Judicial Philosophies to Castrated Legislation: Sexuality, Desire, and Nominations to the Supreme Court of the United States. Portland State University Library, January 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.15760/etd.288.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Gostin, Lawrence. The Future of the Affordable Care Act is a Social and Political Decision That Should Not be Decided by Unelected Supreme Court Justices. Milbank Memorial Fund, April 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1599/mqop.2021.0428.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Ashley, Caitlyn, Elizabeth Spencer Berthiaume, Philip Berzin, Rikki Blassingame, Stephanie Bradley Fryer, John Cox, E. Samuel Crecelius, et al. Law and Policy Resource Guide: A Survey of Eminent Domain Law in Texas and the Nation. Edited by Gabriel Eckstein. Texas A&M University School of Law Program in Natural Resources Systems, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.37419/eenrs.eminentdomainguide.

Full text
Abstract:
Eminent Domain is the power of the government or quasi-government entities to take private or public property interests through condemnation. Eminent Domain has been a significant issue since 1879 when, in the case of Boom Company v. Patterson, the Supreme Court first acknowledged that the power of eminent domain may be delegated by state legislatures to agencies and non-governmental entities. Thus, the era of legal takings began. Though an important legal dispute then, more recently eminent domain has blossomed into an enduring contentious social and political problem throughout the United States. The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution states, “nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” Thus, in the wake of the now infamous decision in Kelo v. City of New London, where the Court upheld the taking of private property for purely economic benefit as a “public use,” the requirement of “just compensation” stands as the primary defender of constitutionally protected liberty under the federal constitution. In response to Kelo, many state legislatures passed a variety of eminent domain reforms specifically tailoring what qualifies as a public use and how just compensation should be calculated. Texas landowners recognize that the state’s population is growing at a rapid pace. There is an increasing need for more land and resources such as energy and transportation. But, private property rights are equally important, especially in Texas, and must be protected as well. Eminent domain and the condemnation process is not a willing buyer and willing seller transition; it is a legally forced sale. Therefore, it is necessary to consider further improvements to the laws that govern the use of eminent domain so Texas landowners can have more assurance that this process is fair and respectful of their private property rights when they are forced to relinquish their land. This report compiles statutes and information from the other forty-nine states to illustrate how they address key eminent domain issues. Further, this report endeavors to provide a neutral third voice in Texas to strike a more appropriate balance between individual’s property rights and the need for increased economic development. This report breaks down eminent domain into seven major topics that, in addition to Texas, seemed to be similar in many of the other states. These categories are: (1) Awarding of Attorneys’ Fee; (2) Compensation and Valuation; (3) Procedure Prior to Suit; (4) Condemnation Procedure; (5) What Cannot be Condemned; (6) Public Use & Authority to Condemn; and (7) Abandonment. In analyzing these seven categories, this report does not seek to advance a particular interest but only to provide information on how Texas law differs from other states. This report lays out trends seen across other states that are either similar or dissimilar to Texas, and additionally, discusses interesting and unique laws employed by other states that may be of interest to Texas policy makers. Our research found three dominant categories which tend to be major issues across the country: (1) the awarding of attorneys’ fees; (2) the valuation and measurement of just compensation; and (3) procedure prior to suit.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

The Supreme Court and Health Reform. Project HOPE, September 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hpb20120927.369613.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Supreme Court of the US' for particular source types:
Journal articles Dissertations / Theses Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography