Academic literature on the topic 'Surcharge load'

The three-dimensional finite difference method was used in this study to analyze the deformation and stresses of a passive pile under surcharge load in extensively deep soft soil. A three-dimensional numerical model was proposed and verified by a field test. The horizontal displacements of the pile agreed well with the field results. This study investigated the pile-foundation soil interaction, the load transfer mechanism, the excess pore water pressure (EPWP), and the horizontal resistance of the foundation soil. The results show that the soil in the corner of the loading area developed a large uplift deformation, while the center of the loading area developed a large settlement. The lateral displacement of the pile decreased sharply with the increase of the depth and increased with the surcharge load. The lateral displacement of the soil was negligible when the depth exceeded 30 m. The EPWP increased in a nonlinear way with the increase of the surcharge load and accumulated with the placement of the new lift. The distribution of the lateral earth pressure in the shallow soil layer was complex, and the negative value was observed under a high surcharge load due to the suction effect. The proportion coefficient of the horizontal resistance coefficient showed much smaller value in the situation of large lateral deformation and high surcharge load. The design code overestimated the horizontal resistance of the shallow foundation soil, which should be given attention for the design and analysis of the laterally loaded structures in extensively soft soil.

A series of centrifuge model tests were performed to investigate the behavior of pile groups subjected to lateral soil movements by surcharge loading from approach embankments. The emphasis was on quantifying the time-dependent response in terms of deflections, bending moments, and earth pressures acting on pile groups during embankment construction and over short- and long-term periods after embankment construction. A variety of instruments were used to examine the soil–pile interaction for pile groups adjacent to surcharge loads. Through these studies, it is found that pile cap deflections and bending moments developed to their maximum values under the short-term surcharge loading and decreased gradually to minimum values under the long-term loading. The ground settlement reached its maximum value under long-term loading, however, due to the consolidation of soft clay. It is also found that the lateral mean pressure acting on the pile is about 0.75 and 0.35 times the surcharge load q (= γH, where γ is the unit weight of the soil and H is the height of the embankment) under short- and long-term loading, respectively.Key words: time-dependent response, lateral soil movements, pile groups, centrifuge model tests, surcharge loads, soft clay.

Surcharge slopes are more vulnerable to instability under the effects of earthquake ground shaking, especially considering the tensile stress. In order to account for the adverse factors of seismic forces and tensile stress, the theory of soil with tensile strength cut-off is deduced and analyzed using the upper bound limit analysis method in this paper. Combined with the quasistatic analysis, the equation of critical acceleration expression for surcharge slope subjected to the dynamic conditions has been evaluated. By using the improved Newmark method, permanent displacements have been analyzed in the case of the classical earthquake ground motions. In addition, optimization algorithm has been undertaken, in which several influencing factors such as slope inclination, internal friction angle, surcharge factor, seismic load, and tension cut-off coefficient have been taken into account, and some results are verified with the classical solutions and FEM results. The results concluded the following: (1) The outcomes of verification results are accurate. (2) The critical acceleration of the slope is significantly affected by tension cut-off with the increasing of surcharge factor and seismic effects. (3) The permanent displacements of surcharge slope considering the tensile strength cut-off can be even 2 times of the traditional analysis; meanwhile, with more reduction of tensile strength, the cumulative displacements increase rapidly. Therefore, considering the influence of tensile strength cut-off is fundamental to the dynamic stability design of surcharge conditions.

Surface surcharge changes the existing equilibrium stress field of the stratum and adversely affects the existing tunnel. This paper presents a simplified analytical solution for calculating the longitudinal displacement of existing tunnels that are subjected to adjacent surcharge loading. Based on the Boussinesq solution, the distribution of the additional load matrix caused by the surface surcharge on the existing tunnel was obtained. A Euler–Bernoulli beam with a Pasternak foundation was used as a simplified model for tunnel stress analysis. Using the corrected reaction coefficient of the foundation bed, the differential equation of tunnel deformation was established, and the solution matrix of the longitudinal displacement of the tunnel was obtained by using the finite difference method. The reliability and applicability of the proposed method were verified by comparing the results with finite element simulation results, field test data, and the calculation results of three simplified elastic analysis methods with different foundation bed coefficients. On this basis, the parameters of the load–tunnel model were analyzed, and the effects of the buried depth, the size of the load, the relative positions of the load and the tunnel, and the relative stiffness of the tunnel soil on the maximum displacement of the existing tunnel were calculated. An empirical formula is proposed for calculating the maximum longitudinal displacement of the existing tunnel subjected to surface surcharge. The findings of this research can provide a basis for the theoretical verification of the deformation response of an existing tunnel subjected to adjacent surface surcharge.