Academic literature on the topic 'Synchronization of ovulation'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Synchronization of ovulation.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Synchronization of ovulation"
Gibbons, John, and Leigh Anne Busbee. "Ovulation Synchronization in Sheep." Biology of Reproduction 81, Suppl_1 (July 1, 2009): 586. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biolreprod/81.s1.586.
Full textKishida, K., T. Nishisouzu, S. Aoki, M. Iwata, O. Dochi, and H. Koyama. "337THE ONSET AND DURATION OF OVULATION IN DAIRY COWS SUPEROVULATED FOLLOWING SYNCHRONIZATION OF FOLLICLE WAVE WITH CIDR AND ESTRADIOL BENZOATE." Reproduction, Fertility and Development 16, no. 2 (2004): 288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/rdv16n1ab337.
Full textAali, M., J. A. Small, G. Giritharan, N. Ramakrishnappa, K. M. Cheng, and R. Rajamahendran. "In vitro assessment of corpus luteum function in cattle following Ovsynch and CIDR ovulation synchronization protocols." Canadian Journal of Animal Science 84, no. 4 (December 1, 2004): 721–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/a03-044.
Full textFerraz, Priscila A., Mariana A. A. Silva, Bia S. S. Carôso, Endrigo A. B. Araujo, Thereza C. B. S. C. Bittencourt, Marcos Chalhoub, Rodrigo F. Bittencourt, and Antonio L. Ribeiro Filho. "Effect of eCG on the follicular dynamics and vascularization of crossbred cows with different circulating progesterone concentrations during synchronization of ovulation in an FTAI protocol." Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira 39, no. 5 (May 2019): 324–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-5150-pvb-5520.
Full textBruno-Galarraga, Macarena, Virginia Cano-Moreno, Beatriz Lago-Cruz, Teresa Encinas, Antonio Gonzalez-Bulnes, and Paula Martinez-Ros. "The Use of hCG for Inducing Ovulation in Sheep Estrus Synchronization Impairs Ovulatory Follicle Growth and Fertility." Animals 11, no. 4 (April 1, 2021): 984. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11040984.
Full textSilva, Otávia Reis, Marco Roberto Bourg de Mello, Lara Nogueira Silenciato, Joaquim Esquerdo Ferreira, Samuel Rodrigues Bonamichi do Couto, Rosane Scatamburlo Lizieire Fajardo, and Osvaldo De Almeida Resende. "Comparison of estradiol benzoate and cypionate in Girolando cows submitted to a timed artificial insemination." Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science 56, no. 3 (October 10, 2019): e155078. http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2019.155078.
Full textMartinez-Ros, Paula, and Antonio Gonzalez-Bulnes. "Efficiency of CIDR-Based Protocols Including GnRH Instead of eCG for Estrus Synchronization in Sheep." Animals 9, no. 4 (April 3, 2019): 146. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9040146.
Full textStuhr, Bhárbara Delboni, Isaac Santos Gil, Tracy Ferreira Lacerda, Mauricio Gomes Favoreto, and Bárbara Loureiro. "Consequences of eight consecutive applications of equine chorionic gonadotropin on ovarian follicle development and ovulation in bos indicus cows." Ciência Rural 46, no. 11 (August 15, 2016): 2018–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20160091.
Full textBrogliatti, G. M., H. Lagomarsino, and G. P. Adams. "Follicle ablation for ovulation synchronization in cattle." Theriogenology 49, no. 1 (January 1998): 339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0093-691x(98)90692-6.
Full textWiltbank, Milo C., and J. Richard Pursley. "The cow as an induced ovulator: Timed AI after synchronization of ovulation." Theriogenology 81, no. 1 (January 2014): 170–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.09.017.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Synchronization of ovulation"
Peeler, Iris Dawn. "Synchronization and Resynchronization of Ovulation and Timed Insemination in Lactating Dairy Cows and Heifers." Thesis, Virginia Tech, 2004. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/9880.
Full textMaster of Science
Stutts, Kyle Jeffrey. "Synchronization of follicular wave emergence, luteal regression, and ovulation for fixed-time artificial insemination in beef cows and heifers." Texas A&M University, 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/4208.
Full textCline, Mark Andrew. "Efficacy of Synthetic Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Analogs for Control of Ovulation During Estrus Synchronization Protocols." Thesis, Virginia Tech, 2002. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/31372.
Full textMaster of Science
Gordon, Miriam Bronwen. "Strategies to improve ovulation synchronization/timed artificial insemination protocol to increase pregnancy rate in dairy cattle." Thesis, University of British Columbia, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/2429/37788.
Full textButtrey, Brad Sterling. "Human chorionic gonadotropin and gonadotropin-releasing hormone influence pregnancy survival and resynchronized ovulation before timed artificial insemination in Holstein cattle." Thesis, Manhattan, Kan. : Kansas State University, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/2097/542.
Full textMpoyo, Robert Kabyla. "Effects of different estrus synchronization and superovulation treatments on ovarian response and embryo collection in the South African Boer goat." Thesis, Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2004. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/70201.
Full textFull text to be digitised and attached to bibliographic record.
ENGLISH ABSTRACT: Different synchronization and superovulation treatments were evaluated in the South African Boer goat (n = 367). Two progestagen implants, Synchro-Mate-B (SMB)/Crestar™ and Controlled Internal Drug Releases (CIDR), containing 3mg norgestomet and 0.33gm of natural progesterone, respectively, were used in the synchronization treatments. A luteolytic agent, Estrumate (Cloprostenol) 125)lg, was administered 12h before progestagen withdrawal. Synchronization treatment groups were: 1) 5MB x 1 (n = 123), one dose of 5MB for 13 to 17 days; 2) 5MB x 2 (n = 32), two doses of 5MB implanted for 10then 17 days; 3) CIDR x 1 (n = 187), one dose of CIDR; 4) CIDR x 2 (n = 25), two doses of CIDR, inserted for 9 to 17 days. On day 1 of the treatment, 0.5mg of estradiol cypionate (ECP) was administered to a group of randomly chosen goats (n = 112). Superovulation treatments consisted of Ovagen ™ or Embryo-STM. An additional single dose (300 UI) of Pregnant Mare Serum Gonadotropin (PMSG) was administered to a group of randomly chosen does. Superovulation treatment groups were: 1) OV alone (n = 147), Ovagen 9 mg every 12h, 8 times starting 72h prior to progestagen removal; 2) OV + PMSG (n = 164), same treatment as 1 plus 300 ru ofPMSG once 48h prior to progestagen removal; 3) E-S alone (n=16), Embryo-S 25 units twice a day, 8 times starting 72h before progestagen removal; 4) E-S + PMSG (n=40), same treatment as 3 plus 300 ru of PMSG once 48h prior to progestagen removal. Most does were naturally bred to bucks. Embryos were collected using the surgicallaparascopic procedure on day 6 and corpora lutea counted. Data were not normally distributed and therefore analyzed using a nonparametrie test (Wilcoxon, 1945 and Kruskal- Wallis, 1952) with outcome variable using the Mixed Procedure of SAS and the Tukey test. Differences were considered significant at p<0.05. Slightly more CL were on the left (52%) than on the right (48%) ovary. Superovulation treatment was significantly associated (p
Pulley, Stephanie Leeann. "Hormonal responses and pregnancy outcomes after five-day ovulation synchronization and presynchronization programs in lactating dairy cows." Diss., Kansas State University, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/2097/18266.
Full textDepartment of Animal Sciences and Industry
Jeffrey S. Stevenson
Two experiments assessed pregnancy outcomes (pregnancy per AI; P/AI) after 5-d Ovsynch-56 Resynch (RES; GnRH injection 5 d before [GnRH-1; d 0] and 56 h (GnRH-2) after the last PGF2α [PGF] injection on d 6 given 24 h after first PGF injection on d 5, and TAI on d 8) with and without a 5-d progesterone insert. In Exp. 1, only 76% of 1,023 nonpregnant cows enrolled on d 34 post-AI had high (≥1 ng/mL) progesterone. The RES-CIDR cows with low progesterone at treatment initiation had greater P/AI than RES-CON (37.7 vs. 29.4%), whereas RES-CIDR cows with high progesterone had lesser P/AI than RES-CON (27.4 vs. 34.3%) suggesting that supplemental progesterone is progesterone-dependent. In Exp. 2, 381 cows were enrolled in similar treatments on d 31 with RES on d 41post-AI plus a third treatment including PG-3-G (Pre-PGF on d 31, Pre-GnRH on d 34, and RES on d 41. The P/AI was similar among treatments but was greater in cows starting RES on d 41 when progesterone was low (44%) than high (33%).Experiment 3 determined LH and ovulatory responses in cows enrolled in two treatments before AI: 1) Pre10 (n = 37): PGF-1 and PGF-2 given 14 d apart (Presynch); or PG3G (n = 33): PGF given concurrent with the PGF-2, 3 d before GnRH-1 followed in 7 d by Ovsynch [injection of GnRH (GnRH-2) 7 d before PGF (PGF-3) and GnRH-3 at either 56 or 72 h after PGF-3] that was initiated 10 d after PGF-2 for Pre10 or 7 d after GnRH-1 of PG3G. The GnRH- 1 increased incidences of LH surges and ovulation in PG3G compared with Pre10. The LH in serum of Pre10 was greater than that of cows receiving PG3G after GnRH-2. Following GnRH- 3, cows receiving GnRH at 72 h had increased incidence of spontaneous LH surges before GnRH-3. The P/AI for PG3G vs. Pre10 and for 56 vs. 72 h was similar, but the Pre10-72 h treatment combination was less than all other treatment combinations. Release of LH is protocol dependent and flexibility of GnRH timing is an advantage for PG3G before first-service TAI.
Reway, Ana Paula. "Desenvolvimento de protocolo de sincronização da onda folicular e determinação do momento ideal para indução da ovulação na espécie equina." Universidade de São Paulo, 2017. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/10/10132/tde-30032017-101852/.
Full textFive experiments were conducted with the objective of estrus synchronization and fixed time ovulation induction in mares. Experiment I: evaluated the efficacy of a new hormonal protocol for estrus synchronization in mares whose reproductive status was unknown during the transitional period. Experiment II: was designed to determine the best time to remove the P4 intravaginal device (PID). The device was removed on day 7, 8 or 9 of the hormonal treatment protocol. Experiment III: tested if protocol efficiency depends on the stage of mares estrus cycle and indicated the best time for hormonal induction of ovulation. Experiments IV and V: mares were submitted to the full protocol of follicular wave synchronization and ovulation induction at different stages of estrus cycle or at known reproductive status. The tested hypothesis was that the estrus synchronization and induction of ovulation, using an PID of 1.44g, causes suppression of follicular growth, and ovulation induction using hCG and GnRH promote ovulation within 42 ± 6 hours of at least 75% of treated animals. The effect of prostaglandin and progestagens at specific times were evaluated for the ability to synchronize follicular wave. A new treatment to induce fixed time ovulation was tested with GnRH and hCG combination in two strategic moments (D10 and D12) to maximize the number of ovulated mares. Administration of prostaglandin at D0, D6 and D8 together with PID maintained for 8 days (D0 to D7) proved to be effective to suppress follicular growth during reproductive period. In mares submitted to this protocol, ovulation occurred naturally and concentrated between D10 and D13. The ovulation induction efficiency was tested at D10 and D12. Most of the animals had preovulatory follicle responsiveness to GnRH and hCG, promoting the success of ovulation induction. The efficiency of the tested synchronization of estrus and ovulation induction protocol was 76.73% and supported the hypothesis of this study. Further studies should be performed on a larger number of animals for possible adjustments in hormonal therapy and verification of the result in a large number of animals.
Saldarriaga, Lopez Juan Pablo. "Ovarian and hormonal events during synchronization of ovulation and timed appointment breeding of Bos indicus-influenced cattle using intravaginal progesterone, GnRH and prostaglandin F2(alpha)." Texas A&M University, 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/4733.
Full textCosta, AntÃnio Nelson Lima da. "SincronizaÃÃo do estro e da ovulaÃÃo em novilhas girolandas: comparaÃÃo entre os protocolos hormonais âcidr-bâ e âovsynch." Universidade Federal do CearÃ, 2006. http://www.teses.ufc.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=1385.
Full textAvaliou-se a eficiÃncia de dois protocolos de induÃÃo e sincronizaÃÃo do estro e da ovulaÃÃo (âCIDR-Bâ âOVSYNCHâ) em 90 novilhas acÃclicas da raÃa Girolanda. Os animais foram distribuÃdos em trÃs grupos, onde o primeiro (n=30) foi submetido ao protocolo âOVSYNCHâ, que consiste na aplicaÃÃo intramuscular (IM) de 1,0ml de GnRH, sete dias depois 2,0ml de prostaglandina F2a (PGF2a), 48h depois mais 1,0ml de GnRH e IATF 16h apÃs a segunda dose de GnRH. O segundo grupo (n=30) foi submetido ao tocolo âCIDR-Bâ, que consiste na introduÃÃo do implante intravaginal âCIDR-Bâ juntamente com a aplicaÃÃo IM de 2,0ml de benzoato de estradiol (BE), apÃs 8 dias à feita a remoÃÃo do âCIDR-Bâ e a aplicaÃÃo IM de 500UI de gonadotrofina sÃrica da Ãgua prenhe (PMSG) e 2,0ml de PGF2a, 24h apÃs à feita mais uma aplicaÃÃo IM de BE e IATF 30h depois desta aplicaÃÃo, ou seja, 54h apÃs a remoÃÃo do âCIDR-Bâ. O rceiro grupo (n=30), grupo controle, nÃo foi submetido a tratamento hormonal. Os diagnÃsticos de gestaÃÃes foram feitos 35 dias apÃs a primeira, segunda e terceira nseminaÃÃes artificiais (IA) por meio de ultra-sonografia (US). TambÃm foi avaliado o custo/benefÃcio de cada protocolo. O tratamento âCIDRBâ mostrou-se mais eficiente em primeira IA (p<0,05), assemelhando-se ao grupo controle com taxas de concepÃÃo e prenhez de 60 e 50%, respectivamente, demonstrando ter uma qualidade de estro comparÃvel ao natural. Na segunda IA, os tratamentos foram equivalentes nas taxas de prenhez, mas diferiram nas de concepÃÃo (96% âCIDR-Bâ e 76% âOVSYNCHâ). Deste modo, o protocolo âCIDR-Bâ mostrouse mais eficiente na induÃÃo da puberdade em novilhas girolandas com melhores taxas de concepÃÃo e prenhez em primeira IA, reduzindo onsideravelmente a idade ao primeiro parto. AlÃm disso, apresenta-se economicamente viÃvel com possibilidade de reutilizaÃÃo do implante, devendo-se atentar aos cuidados com higiene e manipulaÃÃo do produto.
Two oestrus and ovulation synchronization protocols (CIDR-B and OVSYNCH) were tested on 90 acyclical Girolanda heifers. The animals were distributed in three groups. Group I (n=30) was submitted to the OVSYNCH protocol, consisting of: intramuscular (IM) application of 1.0 ml gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), 2.0 ml rostaglandin F2a (PGF2a) after 7 days, 1.0ml GnRH 48h later, then timed artificial insemination (TAI) 16h after the second application of GnRH. Group II (n=30) was submitted to the CIDR-B protocol, consisting of: introduction of intravaginal CIDR-B implant and application of 2.0 ml estradiol benzoate (EB) IM, implant removal after 8 days, application of 500 UI pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (PMSG) and 2.0 ml PGF2a, a second IM application of BE 24h subsequently, then TAI 30h later (i.e. 54h following implant removal). Group III (n=30; control group) received no hormonal treatment. Gestation was verified ltrasonographically 35 days after the first, second and third AI. The cost-benefit ratio of each protocol was also determined: The CIDR-B protocol was most efficient in the first AI in which it was comparable to the control group in providing a near-natural oestrus quality (conception and pregnancy rates of 60% and 50%, respectively; p<0.05). In the second AI, the two treatments yielded similar pregnancy rates, but differed in conception rates (96% for CIDR-B; 76% for OVSYNCH). Thus the CIDR-B protocol was the more efficient in inducing puberty in Girolanda heifers, featuring the best conception and pregnancy rates in the first AI and considerably reducing age at first birth. It is moreover economically feasible as the implant may be reused provided apropriate care is given to hygiene and handling.
Book chapters on the topic "Synchronization of ovulation"
Thatcher, W. W. "OESTRUS CYCLES, CONTROL | Synchronization of Ovulation and Insemination." In Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences, 2178–84. Elsevier, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b0-12-227235-8/00424-7.
Full textPINTO, CARLOS R. F., and PATRICK J. MEYERS. "Control and Synchronization of the Estrous Cycle and Ovulation." In Current Therapy in Large Animal Theriogenology, 91–98. Elsevier, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-072169323-1.50013-1.
Full textThatcher, William W., and Jose E. P. Santos. "Control of Estrous Cycles: Synchronization of Ovulation and Insemination." In Reference Module in Food Science. Elsevier, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-818766-1.00059-3.
Full textPURSLEY, JAMES RICHARD, and NORA M. BELLO. "Ovulation Synchronization Strategies in Dairy Cattle Using PGF2α and GnRH." In Current Therapy in Large Animal Theriogenology, 286–93. Elsevier, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-072169323-1.50041-6.
Full textVAUGHAN, JANE. "Ovarian Synchronization and Induction of Ovulation in Llamas and Alpacas." In Current Therapy in Large Animal Theriogenology, 884–89. Elsevier, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-072169323-1.50123-9.
Full textThatcher, W. W., and J. E. P. Santos. "Reproduction, Events and Management | Control of Estrous Cycles: Synchronization of Ovulation and Insemination." In Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences, 454–60. Elsevier, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-374407-4.00453-2.
Full textJoselin, Calderón-Luna, and Santos-Calderón Carlos. "Bibliographic Review of the Application of Ovulation Synchronization Protocol Based on Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) and Insulin to Increase the Conception Rate in Crossbred Holstein Cows." In Estrogen. IntechOpen, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.85523.
Full text