Academic literature on the topic 'Tarif preferences'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Tarif preferences.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Tarif preferences"
Yandito, Mezky Matthew, and Alvinsyah . "MODEL PILIHAN PENUMPANG ANGKUTAN KOTA DAN KERETA REL LISTRIK DI JAKARTA." Jurnal Transportasi 19, no. 1 (April 29, 2019): 39–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.26593/jt.v19i1.3261.39-48.
Full textAhmad, Jaleel. "Diversion et création d’échanges commerciaux dans le cadre du système canadien de préférences tarifaires." Articles 55, no. 1 (June 29, 2009): 68–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/800814ar.
Full textJang, Minseok, Hyun-Cheol Jeong, Taegon Kim, and Sung-Kwan Joo. "Load Profile-Based Residential Customer Segmentation for Analyzing Customer Preferred Time-of-Use (TOU) Tariffs." Energies 14, no. 19 (September 26, 2021): 6130. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en14196130.
Full textCADOT, OLIVIER, CELINE CARRERE, JAIME DE MELO, and BOLORMAA TUMURCHUDUR. "Product-specific rules of origin in EU and US preferential trading arrangements: an assessment." World Trade Review 5, no. 2 (May 16, 2006): 199–224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1474745606002758.
Full textManushina, A. P., and A. V. Efimov. "The Role of the Eaeu Tariff Preferences Provided to the Goods of Developing Countries in Modern World Trade." International Trade and Trade Policy, no. 3 (October 8, 2019): 124–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.21686/2410-7395-2019-3-124-136.
Full textWu, Wen-Chin. "Rethinking coalition size and trade policies in authoritarian regimes: Are single-party dictatorships less protectionist?" Party Politics 26, no. 2 (January 12, 2018): 143–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354068817752517.
Full textKISHORE, PALLAVI. "A Critical Analysis of Conditionalities in the Generalized System of Preferences." Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international 54 (July 18, 2017): 98–133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cyl.2017.8.
Full textSullivan, Emmett. "Revealing a preference: Imperial preference and the Australian tariff, 1901–14." Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 29, no. 1 (January 2001): 35–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03086530108583111.
Full textBarsegyan, D. E. "Analysis of the impact of tariff preferences on the foreign trade of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Serbia." Upravlenie 8, no. 4 (December 25, 2020): 42–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2020-8-4-42-50.
Full textSwitzer, Stephanie. "ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND THE GENERALIZED SYSTEM OF PREFERENCES: A LEGAL AND APPROPRIATE LINKAGE?" International and Comparative Law Quarterly 57, no. 1 (January 2008): 113–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0020589308000055.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Tarif preferences"
Sánchez, Arnau Juan Carlos. "The generalised system of preferences and the developing countries' trade /." Fribourg : [s.n.], 2001. http://aleph.unisg.ch/hsgscan/hm00054029.pdf.
Full textSorriaux, Jonathan. "Le système de préférences généralisées de l'Union Européenne : le droit douanier facteur de développement." Thesis, Paris Est, 2014. http://www.theses.fr/2014PEST0043/document.
Full textUnder the GSP program, the European Union provides customs tariff reduction to developing countries in order to help them improve their development. Goods of least developed countries (LDC) and vulnerable countries which respect a list of human rights, fundamental labour rights, good governance and the environment norms enjoy a duty free access to the EU market. The GSP utilisation's interest (the benefit ?) is the heart of this study wich include two parts. The first concern the economic developement, the second the social and political developement. In the first title, the economic developement promotion framework is the topic of the first sub-title. It tries to explain how EU favorises some countries (LDC) and protects some sectors of it economy (textile and agriculture). Furthermore, this subtitle seek to know what economical advantages EU can have with the GSP and if this instrument has been efficient in it aim to reduce the poverty in developing countries. While it will have been explain that the GSP's impact in the poverty reduction is not important the second subtitle explain the reasons of this fail. The first reasons are extern of the system. While the MFN notion is challenged with the bilateral trade agreement multiplication, consequently, preferential margin notion is questioned too. So, this notion have to be rethinked. Their relevance must be discuted because without a high MFN level, the GSP can't work. Furthermore, the non tariff measure and service importance must be taken into account in the GSP (a tariff instrument) evaluation. Regarding intern obstacle, rules of origine problem has a central role. More generally, the simplification (and so cost reduction) of the GSP is treated in order to know how the system can be more efficient. In the second title, the first subtitle concern the fundamental rights promotion framework (historical, normative, geogragraphical and methodical framework). The GSP+ and the processal aspect are also treaten in this subtitle. The second subtitle is dedicated to the fundamental rights application advantages in the UE GSP. So, the fundamental rights application by developing countries is positive for the EU economy whether or not their protectionnist aspect. Regarding developing countries, if a fundamental rights application is benefit, it can also be a burden. There are few GSP withdrawal request in case of fundemental rights violation, especialy by trade union and NGO. The last chapter tries to explain this fact
Cooke, Edgar F. A. "Essays on trade preferences of the USA and exports of developing countries." Thesis, University of Sussex, 2014. http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/49937/.
Full textSuominen, Kati. "Rules of origin in global commerce /." Diss., Connect to a 24 p. preview or request complete full text in PDF format. Access restricted to UC campuses, 2004. http://wwwlib.umi.com/cr/ucsd/fullcit?p3127017.
Full textEke, Bede Ugwuanya. "Preferential Trade Agreement as Path to Economic Development: The Case of Nigeria's Response to African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA)." Oxford, Ohio : Miami University, 2007. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc%5Fnum=miami1185563473.
Full textDe, boras Sandrine. "Vers une refondation de la tarification sociale ferroviaire?- Le cas de la carte Familles Nombreuses." Thesis, Lyon 2, 2011. http://www.theses.fr/2011LYO22012/document.
Full textThe aim of our study is to determine, in the context of dysfunctions with social tariffs in the French railway industry, challenging of public policy, and deregulation of network industries, if it is possible to reform this type of tariff and which ways we can use. Our work deals with the case study of the card “Familles Nombreuses”, which is a social tariff imposed by the State to the French railway operator, SNCF.First we analyze social tariffs in a practical and theoretical approach to make a generic definition. Then we analyze some alternative ways of organizing and financing social tariffs.Then, we are seeking, through a detailed historical analysis of the social tariff “Familles Nombreuses” and the governance relations between SNCF and government, elements that allow these changes. We highlight the changes proposed until today and the events that cause these changes.With these lessons and a stated preference survey, we make, some proposals to reform the social tariff “Familles Nombreuses”. They are based on the sensitivity and real consumer choice, not on assumptions or deductions and are evaluated with calculations of surplus. In terms of results, if we can’t make a single proposal that would be "the" solution, we make some recommendations depending on the objectives of different actors and the role they wish to give to social tariffs. We can also determine the commitment to social tariffs. Leeways appear in fact limited. The changes based on the current commercial tarifs may cause a stir discontent and the surplus could be finally low or even negative. One solution could consist in inserting the social tariff « Familles Nombreuses » into the global system of yield management. This would allow the SNCF to have greater leeway on this tariff, the State to face no longer the funding constraints and the user to be offered more discount. Thus, through a policy between commercial and social logic, the yield management could be a tool of social policy, source of social justice and redistribution
Müller, Ralf. "Europäische Entwicklungspolitik zwischen gemeinschaftlicher Handelspolitik, intergouvernementaler Außenpolitik und ökonomischer Effizienz /." Frankfurt am Main [u. a.] : Lang, 2007. http://www.gbv.de/dms/zbw/523584253.pdf.
Full textWang, Yeh-Lih. "The United States generalized system of preferences and its influence on the economic development of the Republic of China on Taiwan." 1989. http://catalog.hathitrust.org/api/volumes/oclc/23102763.html.
Full textTerdudomtham, Thamavit. "The effects of ASEAN preferential trading arrangements on intra-ASEAN trade 1978-1985 /." 1988. http://catalog.hathitrust.org/api/volumes/oclc/32921512.html.
Full textImada, Pearl. "Evaluating economic integration in developing countries an application for the ASEAN preferential trading arrangement /." 1990. http://catalog.hathitrust.org/api/volumes/oclc/29647406.html.
Full textBooks on the topic "Tarif preferences"
Linda, Low, and Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. ASEAN Economic Research Unit., eds. Economic impact of the withdrawal of the GSP on Singapore. Singapore: ASEAN Economic Research Unit, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 1991.
Find full textKeuangan, Indonesia Departemen. Keputusan Menteri Keuangan Republik Indonesia nomor 94/KMK.01/1997 tentang penetapan tarif bea masuk atas importasi barang dalam rangka skema common effective preferential tarif (CEPT) untuk periode 1 Januari 1997 s.d. 31 Desember 2003. Jakarta: Departemen Keuangan, Republik Indonesia, Direktorat Jenderal Bea dan Cukai, 1997.
Find full textKeuangan, Indonesia Departemen. Salinan Peraturan Menteri Keuangan nomor 129/PMK.011/2007 tentang penetapan tarif bea masuk atas barang impor dalam rangka skema common effective preferential tariff (CEPT): Dilengkapi himpunan peraturan Menteri Keuangan tentang ekspor-impor, peraturan Direktur Jenderal Bea dan Cukai, surat edaran (SE). [Jakarta]: Menteri Keuangan, Republik Indonesia, 2007.
Find full textKeuangan, Indonesia Departemen. Salinan Peraturan Menteri Keuangan nomor 129/PMK.011/2007 tentang penetapan tarif bea masuk atas barang impor dalam rangka skema common effective preferential tariff (CEPT): Dilengkapi himpunan peraturan Menteri Keuangan tentang ekspor-impor, peraturan Direktur Jenderal Bea dan Cukai, surat edaran (SE). [Jakarta]: Menteri Keuangan, Republik Indonesia, 2007.
Find full textDean, Judith Myrle. Quantifying the value of U.S. tariff preferences for developing countries. Washington, D.C: World Bank, 2006.
Find full textLee, Hiau Looi. Market access for sale: Latin America's lobbying for U.S. tariff preferences. Washington, D.C: World Bank, 2004.
Find full textLanghammer, Rolf J. Economic impact of generalized tariff preferences. Aldershot, Hants, England: Gower Pub. Co., 1987.
Find full textSproule, Thomas S. Speech of T.S. Sproule, M.P., on preferential trade with Great Britain, Ottawa, Friday, March 16, 1900. [Ottawa?: s.n., 1994.
Find full textUnited States International Trade Commission. President's list of articles which may be designated or modified as eligible articles for purposes of the U.S. generalized system of preferences: Report to the President on investigation nos. TA-503(a)-18 and 332-279. Washington, DC: U.S. International Trade Commission, 1989.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Tarif preferences"
Schukat, Philipp, Jenny Rust, and Julia Baumhauer. "Tariff Preferences for Sustainable Products: A Summary." In Voluntary Standard Systems, 419–30. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35716-9_27.
Full textAtul Kaushik. "WTO Dispute on EC—Tariff Preferences: Systemic Implications." In WTO Dispute Settlement at Twenty, 159–77. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0599-2_9.
Full textFrancois, Joe. "Comment: the Effects of Tariff Liberalizations and Preference Erosion." In Coping with Trade Reforms, 59–65. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230377806_3.
Full textRaimondi, Valentina, Margherita Scoppola, and Alessandro Olper. "Trade Preference Through Tariff Rate Quotas and the Gravity Equation: Does the Tariff Equivalent Matter?" In The Trade Impact of European Union Preferential Policies, 175–95. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16564-1_9.
Full textSilva, Armindo da. "The Portuguese Experience of European Integration—A Quantitative Assessment of The Effects of EFTA and EEC Tariff Preferences." In European Integration and the Iberian Economies, 87–143. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09712-8_5.
Full textYannopoulos, George N. "The Effects of Tariff Preferences on Export Expansion, Export Diversification and Investment Diversion : A Comparative Analysis of the Iberian and Other Mediterranean Economies." In European Integration and the Iberian Economies, 66–86. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09712-8_4.
Full text"Tariff Preferences." In Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, 1261. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95963-4_300175.
Full textMcguire, E. B. "Imperial Preference." In The British Tariff System, 256–78. Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315099415-18.
Full text"Explanatory notes on the preferential tariff scheme of Norway." In Generalized System of Preferences, 3–12. UN, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.18356/c011b44a-en.
Full text"Checklist: How to benefit from the preferential tariff scheme of Norway." In Generalized System of Preferences, 1–2. UN, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.18356/7dc05557-en.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Tarif preferences"
Clairand, Jean-Michel, Javier Rodriguez Garcia, and Carlos Alvarez Bel. "Smart charging for an electric vehicle aggregator considering user tariff preference." In 2017 IEEE Power & Energy Society Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT). IEEE, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/isgt.2017.8086068.
Full textNewton, R., S. Dunn, C. Neail, C. Brown, J. Diegnan, R. Thalava, and R. Puttha. "G161(P) The best practice tariff in paediatric diabetes –patient views and preferences." In Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, Abstracts of the Annual Conference, 24–26 May 2017, ICC, Birmingham. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2017-313087.160.
Full textHawthorne, Bryant D., and Jitesh H. Panchal. "Policy Design for Sustainable Energy Systems Considering Multiple Objectives and Incomplete Preferences." In ASME 2012 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/detc2012-70426.
Full textReports on the topic "Tarif preferences"
Dey Ancharaz, Vinaye, and Paolo Ghisu. Deepening India’s Engagement with the LDCs: An in-depth Analysis of India’s Duty-free Tariff Preference Scheme. ICTSD, October 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.7215/co_ip_20141029.
Full text