Books on the topic 'Tarif preferences'

Linda, Low, and Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. ASEAN Economic Research Unit., eds. Economic impact of the withdrawal of the GSP on Singapore. Singapore: ASEAN Economic Research Unit, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 1991.

Keuangan, Indonesia Departemen. Keputusan Menteri Keuangan Republik Indonesia nomor 94/KMK.01/1997 tentang penetapan tarif bea masuk atas importasi barang dalam rangka skema common effective preferential tarif (CEPT) untuk periode 1 Januari 1997 s.d. 31 Desember 2003. Jakarta: Departemen Keuangan, Republik Indonesia, Direktorat Jenderal Bea dan Cukai, 1997.

Keuangan, Indonesia Departemen. Salinan Peraturan Menteri Keuangan nomor 129/PMK.011/2007 tentang penetapan tarif bea masuk atas barang impor dalam rangka skema common effective preferential tariff (CEPT): Dilengkapi himpunan peraturan Menteri Keuangan tentang ekspor-impor, peraturan Direktur Jenderal Bea dan Cukai, surat edaran (SE). [Jakarta]: Menteri Keuangan, Republik Indonesia, 2007.

Keuangan, Indonesia Departemen. Salinan Peraturan Menteri Keuangan nomor 129/PMK.011/2007 tentang penetapan tarif bea masuk atas barang impor dalam rangka skema common effective preferential tariff (CEPT): Dilengkapi himpunan peraturan Menteri Keuangan tentang ekspor-impor, peraturan Direktur Jenderal Bea dan Cukai, surat edaran (SE). [Jakarta]: Menteri Keuangan, Republik Indonesia, 2007.

Dean, Judith Myrle. Quantifying the value of U.S. tariff preferences for developing countries. Washington, D.C: World Bank, 2006.

Lee, Hiau Looi. Market access for sale: Latin America's lobbying for U.S. tariff preferences. Washington, D.C: World Bank, 2004.

Langhammer, Rolf J. Economic impact of generalized tariff preferences. Aldershot, Hants, England: Gower Pub. Co., 1987.

Sproule, Thomas S. Speech of T.S. Sproule, M.P., on preferential trade with Great Britain, Ottawa, Friday, March 16, 1900. [Ottawa?: s.n., 1994.

Duckworth, H. T. F. The significance of tariff-barriers. [S.l: s.n., 1997.

United States International Trade Commission. President's list of articles which may be designated or modified as eligible articles for purposes of the U.S. generalized system of preferences: Report to the President on investigation nos. TA-503(a)-18 and 332-279. Washington, DC: U.S. International Trade Commission, 1989.

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Effects of competitive need exclusions and redesignations under the United States scheme of generalized preferences. [S.l: United Nations], 1986.

Stephen, Woolcock, ed. The rise of bilateralism: Comparing American, European, and Asian approaches to preferential trade agreements. New York: United Nations University, 2009.

Ronald, Reagan. Status of Portugal under the Generalized System of Preferences Program: Communication from the President of the United States transmitting notification of the intent to remove Portugal from the list of beneficiary developing countries under the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) Program, pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 2462(a). Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1985.

Commission, United States International Trade. President's list of articles which may be designated or modified as eligible articles for purposes of the U.S. generalized system of perferences: Report to the President on investigations nos. TA-503(a)-13 and 332-238. Washington, DC: U.S. International Trade Commission, 1986.

Arnau, J. C. Sanchez. The generalised system of preferences and the World Trade Organisation. London: Cameron May, 2002.

Reagan, Ronald. According Greenland preferences: Message from the President of the United States transmitting notification of his intention to add Greenland to the list of beneficiary developing countries under the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP), pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 2462(a). Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1987.

Lederman, Daniel. Geopolitical interests and preferential access to U.S. markets. [Washington, D.C: World Bank, 2005.

Nhara, Anselmo. The impact of WTO duty-free and quota-free market access for least developed countries (LDCs). Harare: Trade and Development Studies Centre, 2006.

Bakır, A. Fikri. Genel preferanslar sistemi, ABD uygulaması ve Türkiye. Beşiktaş, İstanbul: Türkiye Dış Ticaret Derneği, Araştırma Merkezi, 1988.

Ronald, Reagan. According Greenland preferences: Message from the President of the United States transmitting notification of his intention to add Greenland to the list of beneficiary developing countries under the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP), pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 2462(a). Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1987.

Reagan, Ronald. According Greenland preferences: Message from the President of the United States transmitting notification of his intention to add Greenland to the list of beneficiary developing countries under the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP), pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 2462(a). Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1987.

Commission of the European Communities. Practical guide to the use of the European communities' scheme of generalized tariff preferences. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1986.

Ozden, Caglar. The perversity of preferences: The generalized system of preferences and developing country trade policies. Washington, D.C: Trade, Development Research Group, World Bank, 2003.

Ferreira, Jonathan R. U.S. trade preferences for developing countries. Edited by Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service. [Hauppauge,] N.Y: Nova Science Publishers, 2012.

Relating to consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 3009) to extend the Andean Trade Preference Act, to grant additional trade benefits under that act, and for other purposes: Report (to accompany H. Res. 450). [Washington, D.C: U.S. G.P.O., 2002.

Silva, Peri Agostinho da. The role of importers and exporters in the determination of the U.S. tariff preferences granted to Latin America. [Washington, D.C: World Bank, 2005.

Michaely, Michael. Trade preferential agreements in Latin America: An ex-ante assessment. Washington, DC: Latin America and the Caribbean Regional Office, Office of the Chief Economist, 1996.

United States International Trade Commission. Advice on providing additional GSP benefits for least developed countries. Washington, DC: U.S. International Trade Commission, 1997.

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Rules. Relating to consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 3009) to extend the Andean Trade Preference Act, to grant additional trade benefits under that act, and for other purposes: Report (to accompany H. Res. 450). [Washington, D.C: U.S. G.P.O., 2002.

Brenton, Paul. Integrating the least developed countries into the world trading system: The current impact of EU preferences under everything but arms. Washington, D.C: World Bank, 2003.

Ranjan, Prabhash. Industrial tariffs and South Asia: Interpreting for development. New Delhi: Centre for Trade and Development, 2006.

Ranjan, Prabhash. Tariff negotiations in NAMA & South Asia: July agreement and beyond. New Delhi: Centre for Trade and Development, 2005.

chính, Vietnam Bộ tài. CEPT 2006-2013: Danh mục hàng hoá và mức thuế suất thuế nhập khẩu ưu đãi đặc biệt của Việt Nam để thực hiện hiệp định về chương trình ưu đãi thuế quan có hiệu lực chung (CEPT) của các nước ASEAN giai đoạn, 2006-2013. Hà Nội: Nhà xuất bản Tài chính, 2006.

Mitchell, Donald O. Sugar in the Caribbean: Adjusting to eroding preferences. Washington, D.C: World Bank, 2006.

V, Gustavo del Castillo. U.S.-Mexican trade relations: From the generalized system of preferences to a formal bilateral trade agreement. La Jolla, Calif: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego, 1985.

V, Gustavo del Castillo. U.S.-Mexican trade relations: From the generalized system of preferences to a formal bilateral trade agreement. La Jolla, Calif: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego, 1985.

Council, Pakistan Business. A road map for optiminzing Pakistan's GSP plus status. Karachi: Pakistan Business Council, 2014.

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Government Operations. Government Information, Justice, and Agriculture Subcommittee. The generalized system of preferences: In a rush to import trouble? : hearing before the Government Information, Justice, and Agriculture Subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives, One Hundred Second Congress, second session, April 30, 1992. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1993.

Panagariya, Arvind. Preferential trading in South Asia. Washington, D.C: World Bank, 2006.

U.S. preference programs: Options for reform : hearing before the Committee on Finance, United States Senate, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, second session, March 9, 2010. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 2010.

Karacaovali, Baybars. The clash of liberalizations: Preferential versus multilateral trade liberalization in the European Union. [Washington, D.C: World Bank, 2005.

Institute of Policy Studies (Colombo, Sri Lanka), ed. Utilization of preferential trade arrangements: Sri Lanka's experience with the EU and US GSP scheme. Colombo: Institute of Policy Studies, 2007.

Subramanian, Arvind. The Africa Growth and Opportunity Act and its Rules of Origin: Generosity undermined? Washington, D.C: World Bank, Development Research Group, Trade, 2002.

Chakraborty, Debashis. Preferential trade agreements and India: A review of issues. New Delhi: Rajiv Gandhi Institute for Contemporary Studies, 2005.

Cho, Mi-jin. Ch'oebin kaedoguk e taehan t'ŭkhye kwase chedo hwaryong hyŏnhwang mit kwaje. Sŏul T'ŭkpyŏlsi: Taeoe Kyŏngje Chŏngch'aek Yŏn'guwŏn, 2010.

Edmonds, Christopher M. The role of preferential trading arrangements in Asia. Manila: Asian Development Bank, 2002.

Krishna, Kala. Conditional policies in general equilibrium. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2005.

Cho, Mi-jin. Han'guk ŭi ilban t'ŭkhye kwanse chedo (GSP) toip ch'ujin panghyang. Sŏul T'ŭkpyŏlsi: Taeoe Kyŏngje Chŏngch'aek Yŏn'guwŏn, 2011.

Anderson, Kym. Doha merchandise trade reform: What's at stake for developing countries ? Washington, D.C: World Bank, 2006.

Extension of Generalized System of Preferences: Report (to accompany H.R. 3010) (including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office). [Washington, D.C: U.S. G.P.O., 2001.