Academic literature on the topic 'Teacher homework practices'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Teacher homework practices.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Teacher homework practices"
Al-Maamari, Saif. "Social Studies Teachers’ Homework Practices in Oman." Asian Social Science 16, no. 7 (June 29, 2020): 146. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v16n7p146.
Full textFox, Kathy Renita. "Family Literacy Practices Surrounding Homework." Journal of Family Diversity in Education 2, no. 2 (December 5, 2016): 100–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.53956/jfde.2016.72.
Full textScott, Catherine M., and Nelda Glaze. "Homework Policy and Student Choice: Findings from a Montessori Charter School." Journal of Montessori Research 3, no. 2 (November 15, 2017): 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v3i2.6585.
Full textJohnson, Janice K., and Andrulee Pontius. "Homework: a survey of teacher beliefs and practices." Research in Education 41, no. 1 (May 1989): 71–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/003452378904100108.
Full textEkstam, Ulrika, Karin Linnanmäki, and Pirjo Aunio. "The Impact of Teacher Characteristics on Educational Differentiation Practices in Lower Secondary Mathematics Instruction." Lumat: International Journal of Math, Science and Technology Education 5, no. 1 (December 31, 2017): 41–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.31129/lumat.5.1.253.
Full textBrock, Cynthia H., Diane Lapp, James Flood, Douglas Fisher, and Keonghee Tao Han. "Does Homework Matter? An Investigation of Teacher Perceptions About Homework Practices for Children From Nondominant Backgrounds." Urban Education 42, no. 4 (July 2007): 349–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0042085907304277.
Full textNagy, Philip, Ross E. Traub, Kathryn MacRury, and Roslyn Klaiman. "High School Calculus: Comparing the Content of Assignments and Tests." Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 22, no. 1 (January 1991): 69–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.22.1.0069.
Full textMoorhouse, Benjamin Luke. "Standardized Homework Practices and Teacher Autonomy: Experiences of Primary English Language Teachers in Hong Kong." Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 27, no. 5 (June 27, 2018): 345–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0391-4.
Full textFaure, Karine Millon, Teresa Assude, Julie Gobert, and Claire Guille-Biel Winder. "Who Can Help a Student to do Their Homework? Reflections on the Knowledge and Beliefs Used to Support Students in Their Individual Work." Education and Society 40, no. 1 (July 1, 2022): 65–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.7459/es/40.1.05.
Full textBarlow, Angela T., and Jill Mizzell Drake. "Division by a Fraction: Assessing Understanding through Problem Writing." Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School 13, no. 6 (February 2008): 326–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.5951/mtms.13.6.0326.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Teacher homework practices"
Hoeke, Christy E. "Homework Practices: Teacher and Parent Perceptions of Efficacy and Purpose." Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University, 2017. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/3283.
Full textPatton, Sebrina Rochell. "Parents' and Teachers' Perceptions of Parental Involvement." ScholarWorks, 2019. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/7419.
Full textBedford, Pandora D. "Teachers' beliefs and practices regarding homework| An examination of the cognitive domain embedded in third grade mathematics homework." Thesis, The University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee, 2014. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=3629906.
Full textThe purpose of this phenomenological study was to gain a better understanding of third grade math teachers' beliefs and practices regarding homework, to explain how teachers' beliefs and practices regarding homework aligned to the framework of the Revised Bloom's Taxonomy Cognitive Domain, and to determine the administrative influences on homework practices. The data were collected during October and November 2013. Six third grade math teachers (primary unit of analysis) and four principals (secondary unit of analysis) were interviewed from Dell School District. Each participant (teacher and principal) was interviewed for approximately one hour. A second meeting was set at a later time with the teachers. This second meeting was arranged in order to ask additional questions based on the interviewees' responses from the initial interview and also to collect homework samples. The follow-up meetings varied between 10 to 15 minutes. The interview transcripts were then transcribed. The data were analyzed to determine the themes: teachers' beliefs and practices of homework, alignment of homework items to the Revised Bloom's Taxonomy, and administrative influences on homework.
Three major themes emerged regarding teachers' beliefs about homework—extra repetition of practice, connection between home and school, and building responsibility. Four major themes related to teachers' homework practices were found— quantity of homework, type of homework, source of homework, and differentiation of homework. Overall, the majority of homework items, across all cognitive domain levels, were aligned to a low category (remembering, 68%); however, there were some variations among the distributions of homework. In comparing what teachers espoused about homework practices and what was actually assigned, the majority were aligned. Four major themes emerged from the principals' comments—school-wide expectations for homework, complaints about homework, principals' beliefs and value about homework, and cognitive domain of homework. The four major findings of the study included: homework was used primarily for low-level practice, more so than high-level thinking; teachers' homework practices were not part of the principals' leadership agenda, because principals took a “hands-off approach” to homework; teachers assigned low-level homework with little attention to Bloom's Taxonomy cognitive domain, because this allowed students to be successful and responsible for completing their homework and; homework was a lost art, because principals did not utilize the opportunity to talk with teachers about using homework more effectively to promote students' learning; therefore, teachers continued implementing their same homework practices from the past.
(9829964), Susan Richardson. "Teacher homework practices in Queensland state primary schools." Thesis, 2015. https://figshare.com/articles/thesis/Teacher_homework_practices_in_Queensland_state_primary_schools/13437326.
Full textNunes, Ana Rita Silva. "Did you do your homework? Teacher’ perspectives of homework follow-up practices." Master's thesis, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/1822/37542.
Full textThe teachers’ homework practices, namely the strategies used to monitor students’ homework assignments, impacts on students’ homework behaviors and academic achievement. However, the homework follow-up practices were not yet extensively examined. This paper explored middle school teachers’ perspectives of homework follow-up practices and the purposes underpinning their choices. The data collected from six focus groups with 47 mathematics’ middle school teachers (10 men) were analyzed using thematic analysis. Findings revealed that teachers monitor their students’ homework using different practices solely or combined (e.g., controlling homework completion, correcting homework on the board, monitoring homework process). The purposes (e.g., promoting school engagement, addressing students’ academic difficulties) underpinning teachers’ choices for the usage of the homework followup practices were also identified and discussed. In addition results indicated the use of some homework follow-up practices are linked to specific purposes. Furthermore, teachers shared common constraints limiting the usage of their homework follow-up practices (e.g., class size, maladaptive students’ homework behaviors). The recommendations and ideas discussed in this study may facilitate the development of effective homework follow-up practices. This study also addresses new avenues for future research.
As práticas de follow-up do trabalho de casa utilizadas pelos professores em sala de aula influenciam os comportamentos dos alunos durante a realização desta tarefa e o seu rendimento académico. Contudo, estas práticas têm sido pouco estudadas na literatura. Este estudo explora a perspetiva dos professores de matemática do 3.º Ciclo do Ensino Básico sobre as práticas de follow-up do trabalho de casa e os propósitos que norteiam a sua implementação. Os dados foram recolhidos através de seis grupos de discussão constituídos, no total, por 47 professores. Procedeu-se à análise temática para analisar os dados. Os resultados sugerem que os professores monitorizam o trabalho de casa através de práticas isoladas ou combinadas (e.g., controlo do completamento, correção do trabalho de casa no quadro), estando guiados por diferentes propósitos (e.g., promover school engagement). Além disso, os resultados demonstram que a utilização de algumas práticas está relacionada com propósitos específicos. No discurso dos professores emergiram alguns constrangimentos que limitam a implementação destas práticas. Implicações para a prática e para a investigação são apresentadas e discutidas.
Eita, Pauline. "Teacher practices to involve parents in homework in Namibian schools." Diss., 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/2057.
Full textEducational studies
M. Ed.
Cunha, Jennifer Silva. "Homework monitoring in mathematics: mapping and examining practices of teachers, students and parents." Doctoral thesis, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/1822/56466.
Full textHomework, defined as the set of tasks assigned by teachers to students to be completed during non-school hours, is widely used in schools as a tool to promote students’ learning. This has been consistently studied for the last decades in order to analyze its impact on students’ academic achievement and behavioral, cognitive, motivational and emotional variables. Recently, the research has been focused on exploring and analyzing variables related to each of the actors in the homework process (i.e. teachers, students, and parents) to maximize the benefits of homework. In order to fill the gaps in the research (focused mainly on the process of monitoring homework by teachers and students in the classroom, as well as by parents at home), the first part of this thesis is comprised of three studies: i) a qualitative study that aims to explore teachers’ conceptions of the homework feedback focusing on four key aspects: definition, purpose, types of practices, and perceived impact; ii) a mixed methods study (sequential explanatory design) that aims to understand the predictive impact of five types of homework feedback reported by teachers and perceived by students on students’ school engagement; and iii) a quantitative study that aims to validate the parental homework management scale. Given that mathematics is a subject of great relevance to other areas of knowledge, as well as a concern for educators due to the high rates of failure in the subject, all studies are focused on mathematics. In the first study, 47 elementary and middle school teachers participated. Data were collected through two methods (focus groups and classroom observations) and analyzed through content analysis. Findings indicated that participants conceptualized homework feedback in three directions (i.e. teachers’ feedback provided to students, students’ feedback provided to teachers, and homework self-feedback), and the purpose reported by most teachers is their monitoring of students’ learning. Participants also reported the types of homework feedback frequently used in class (corroborated by classroom observations) and their perceived impact on students. This study provided implications for educational practice (e.g., identification of specific training needs) and for research (e.g., relationships between homework feedback types and dimensions of student school engagement that were not yet analyzed). In the second study, 4,288 6th grade students and their teachers (N = 170) participated in the quantitative phase. At this phase, multivariate multilevel regression models showed positive and statistically significant relationships between the five types of homework feedback and the students' school engagement, although with low effect sizes and with different results at the student and class levels. In the qualitative phase of this mixed methods study, 29 students were randomly selected to participate from the initial sample. Thematically analyzed data indicated, among other aspects, that students: i) did not identify some homework feedback types (e.g., praise); ii) reported maladaptive behaviors during homework monitoring in the classroom (e.g., students did not check their homework); and iii) reported not using the homework feedback provided on a regular basis. The data allowed concluding that homework feedback is beneficial for students' school engagement, yet their full potential is not reached. In the third study, 2,118 parent-child dyads (6th grade) were split into two groups to conduct two phases of data analysis: exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Results indicated that the parental homework management scale is comprised of two distinct yet related factors: environment-time and motivation-emotion management. The scale revealed good psychometric quality, being a useful instrument for future research. The results of the research are of great relevance for educational practice. However, teachers do not have enough time or technical knowledge to interpret results of the studies due to its complexity. For these reasons and in order to contribute to improve teachers’ homework practices and, consequently, students' learning; the second part of this thesis presents two documents aiming to disseminate the results of research: i) an article focused on homework practices under a self-regulated learning lens, and ii) an e-book focused on feedback practices in general and on homework feedback in particular.
O Trabalho Para Casa (TPC), definido como o conjunto de tarefas prescritas pelos professores aos alunos para serem realizadas fora do horário letivo, é muito utilizado no contexto escolar como ferramenta promotora da aprendizagem dos alunos. Este tem sido objeto de estudo intensivo nas últimas décadas, no sentido de analisar o seu impacto no rendimento académico e nas variáveis comportamentais, cognitivas, motivacionais e emocionais dos alunos. Mais recentemente, os investigadores estão focados em explorar e analisar variáveis, relacionadas com cada um dos intervenientes do processo de TPC (i.e. professores, alunos e pais), que possam maximizar os seus benefícios. Com o propósito de responder às lacunas da investigação (centradas, essencialmente, no processo de monitorização do TPC na sala de aula pelos professores e pelos alunos e em casa pelos pais), a primeira parte da presente tese é constituída por três estudos: i) um estudo qualitativo com o objetivo de explorar as conceções dos professores acerca do feedback de TPC relativas a quatro aspetos-chave: definição, propósito, tipos de práticas e impacto percebido; ii) um estudo misto (design sequencial explicativo) com o objetivo de compreender o impacto preditivo de cinco tipologias de feedback de TPC reportadas pelos professores e percebidas pelos alunos no seu envolvimento escolar; e iii) um estudo quantitativo com o objetivo de validar uma escala de envolvimento parental na gestão do TPC dos alunos. Uma vez que a disciplina de matemática é de grande relevância para outras áreas do saber, assim como alvo de preocupação por partes dos educadores, devido às suas elevadas taxas de insucesso; todos os estudos realizados são focados na matemática. No primeiro estudo participaram 47 professores do 2.º e 3.º ciclos do Ensino Básico, sendo os dados recolhidos através de dois métodos (grupos focais e observações de sala de aula) e analisados através da análise de conteúdo. Os resultados indicaram que os professores concetualizam o feedback de TPC em três direções (feedback de TPC para os alunos, feedback de TPC para o professor e auto feedback de TPC), sendo “monitorização da aprendizagem dos alunos pelo professor” o propósito mais reportado. Os professores referiram também quais as tipologias de feedback de TPC mais utilizadas na sala de aula (corroboradas pelas observações) e o seu impacto percebido. Este estudo providenciou implicações para a prática educativa (e.g., identificação de necessidades de formação) e para a investigação (e.g., relações entre tipologias de feedback e dimensões do envolvimento escolar dos alunos que ainda não tinham sido analisadas). No segundo estudo participaram 4,288 alunos do 6.º ano de escolaridade e os respetivos professores (N = 170) na fase quantitativa. Nesta fase, a partir de um modelo multinível de regressão multivariada, encontraram-se relações positivas e estatisticamente significativas entre as cinco tipologias de feedback de TPC e o envolvimento escolar dos alunos, embora com baixos tamanhos do efeito e com resultados diferentes ao nível do aluno e da turma. Na fase qualitativa deste estudo misto participaram 29 alunos selecionados aleatoriamente da amostra inicial. Os dados, analisados a partir de uma análise temática, indicaram, entre outros aspetos, que os alunos: i) não identificam algumas tipologias de feedback (e.g., elogio); ii) reportam comportamentos desadaptativos durante a monitorização do TPC na sala de aula (e.g., não corrigem o TPC); e iii) reportam não utilizar o feedback de TPC providenciado de forma regular. Os dados permitiram concluir que o feedback de TPC é benéfico para o envolvimento escolar dos alunos, contudo o seu potencial é subaproveitado. No terceiro estudo participaram 2,118 díades pais-filhos (6.º ano de escolaridade), divididas em dois grupos para realizar duas fases de análise de dados: análise fatorial exploratória e análise fatorial confirmatória. Os resultados indicaram que a escala de envolvimento parental na gestão de TPC é constituída por dois fatores distintos, contudo relacionados: gestão do ambiente-tempo e gestão da motivação-emoção. A escala revelou boa qualidade psicométrica, sendo um instrumento útil para estudos futuros neste domínio. Os resultados da investigação são de grande relevância para a prática educativa; contudo, os professores não têm tempo nem conhecimento técnico suficiente para interpretar os dados dos estudos devido à sua complexidade. Por estes motivos e com o intuito de contribuir para melhorar as práticas de TPC dos professores e, consequentemente, a aprendizagem dos alunos; na segunda parte desta tese são apresentados dois documentos de disseminação dos resultados da investigação: i) um artigo sobre as práticas de TPC sob uma lente autorregulatória da aprendizagem e ii) um e-book sobre as práticas de feedback em geral e do TPC em particular.
A presente tese de doutoramento beneficiou do apoio da Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT) através da Bolsa de Doutoramento Individual com a referência SFRH/BD/95341/2013;
Os trabalhos desta tese foram realizados, em parte, no Centro de Investigação em Psicologia (UID/PSI/01662/2013), Universidade do Minho, financeiramente suportado pela Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia e pelo Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior, através de fundos nacionais, e co- financiado pelo FEDER, através do COMPETE2020, no âmbito do acordo Portugal 2020 (POCI-01-0145- FEDER-007653).
Books on the topic "Teacher homework practices"
Foyle, Harvey Charles. Homework: A practical teacher's guide. Portland, Me. (P.O. Box 658, Portland, Me. 04104-0658): J.W. Walch, 1989.
Find full textZhukova, Galina, and Margarita Rushaylo. Math 100 points. ru: INFRA-M Academic Publishing LLC., 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/1077344.
Full textHOLT, RINEHART AND WINSTON. Holt Mathematics: Teacher Homework Practice Workbook Course 1. HOLT, RINEHART AND WINSTON, 2007.
Find full textLimoges, Norman G. The perceptions and attitudes of teachers, parents, and students regarding the assignment of practice, preparation, and extension homework for high school students. 1987.
Find full textMCDOUGAL, HOLT. Holt McDougal Mathematics: Homework and Practice Workbook Teacher's Guide Grade 7. HOLT MCDOUGAL, 2011.
Find full textHolt McDougal Mathematics: Homework and Practice Workbook Teacher's Guide Grade 8. Holt McDougal, 2011.
Find full textHolt McDougal Mathematics: Homework and Practice Workbook Teacher's Guide Grade 6. HOLT MCDOUGAL, 2011.
Find full textKanold, Timothy D., Bill Barnes, Matthew R. Larson, Jessica Kanold-McIntyre, Sarah Schuhl, and Mona Toncheff. Mathematics Homework and Grading in a PLC at WorkTM (Math Homework and Grading Practices that Drive Student Engagement and Achievement) (Every Student Can Learn Mathematics). Solution Tree Press, 2018.
Find full textHolt. Homework and Practice Workbook : Teacher's Edition (Holt Middle School Math Course 1.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 2003.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Teacher homework practices"
Fox, Kathy R. "Lessons Learned From Virtual Home Visits." In Advances in Early Childhood and K-12 Education, 47–63. IGI Global, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-4569-3.ch004.
Full textLim, Sun Sun. "At School." In Transcendent Parenting, 64–87. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190088989.003.0004.
Full textSikma, Lynn M., and Peter Hunt. "Evolving Literacies." In Advances in Early Childhood and K-12 Education, 19–31. IGI Global, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-4569-3.ch002.
Full textLipovec, Alenka, and Jasmina Ferme. "Some Factors Influencing Effectiveness of Mathematics Homework." In Theory and Practice: An Interface or A Great Divide?, 330–35. WTM-Verlag Münster, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.37626/ga9783959871129.0.63.
Full textMatsuda, Toshiki. "Cultivating Student-Teachers’ Problem-Solving Abilities by Promoting Utilization of Various Ways of Thinking through E-Learning and E-Portfolio Systems." In Cases on Inquiry through Instructional Technology in Math and Science, 439–63. IGI Global, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-0068-3.ch016.
Full textFerguson, Robert J., and Karen Lee Gillock. "Visit 3." In Memory and Attention Adaptation Training, 49–58. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780197521571.003.0004.
Full textMeuret, Alicia E., Halina J. Dour, Amanda G. Loerinc Guinyard, and Michelle G. Craske. "Let’s Get Started!" In Positive Affect Treatment for Depression and Anxiety, edited by Alicia E. Meuret, Halina J. Dour, Amanda G. Loerinc Guinyard, and Michelle G. Craske, 25–30. Oxford University PressNew York, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med-psych/9780197548608.003.0003.
Full textPulley, Philip G. "Blending Face-to-Face and Technology." In Practical Applications and Experiences in K-20 Blended Learning Environments, 105–19. IGI Global, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4912-5.ch008.
Full textKing, Shande. "Formative Assessment Online via Flipped Interactive Screencasts." In Handbook of Research on Online Pedagogical Models for Mathematics Teacher Education, 257–72. IGI Global, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1476-4.ch016.
Full textRogers, Holly, and Margaret Maytan. "The Second Class." In Mindfulness for the Next Generation, edited by Holly Rogers and Margaret Maytan, 85–98. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med-psych/9780190905156.003.0007.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Teacher homework practices"
Bempechat, Janine. "Preparing Teachers to Navigate Conflict When Equity Is at Stake: Teacher-Educators' Beliefs About Homework-Related Practices." In 2021 AERA Annual Meeting. Washington DC: AERA, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/1688869.
Full textNakk, Anne-Mai. "Primary Teachers’ Instructional Behavior as Related to Learning Engagement and Homework Practices." In 3th International Conference on Cognitive - Social, and Behavioural Sciences. Cognitive-crcs, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2015.08.20.
Full textSakai, Rena, and Christine Bakke. "Student Ownership of Learning: A Student’s Experience." In InSITE 2022: Informing Science + IT Education Conferences. Informing Science Institute, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.28945/4992.
Full textUğur, Latif Onur, and Kadir Penbe. "A Social Media Supported Distance Education Application for the Building Cost Course Given in Civil Engineering Education During the COVID 19 Quarantine." In 4th International Conference of Contemporary Affairs in Architecture and Urbanism – Full book proceedings of ICCAUA2020, 20-21 May 2021. Alanya Hamdullah Emin Paşa University, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.38027/iccaua2021tr0030n9.
Full textCimbala, John, Shane Moeykens, Ashish Kulkarni, and Ajay Parihar. "Using FlowLab, A Computational Fluid Dynamics Tool, to Facilitate the Teaching of Fluid Mechanics." In ASME 2004 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. ASMEDC, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/imece2004-59870.
Full text