Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Technocracy / Journal articles

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Technocracy.

Journal articles on the topic 'Technocracy'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 30 July 2024

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Technocracy.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Berch, V. V. "Key factors of the influence of technocracy on the tendentious aspects of the development of democracy: a global dimension." Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence, no. 4 (September 14, 2023): 110–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2023.04.16.

Full text

Abstract:

The scientific article examines the key factors of the influence of technocracy on the tendentious aspects of the development of democracy.It has been established that the form of government and the peculiarities of the choice of value approaches to empowering individuals with the powers to form and implement state policy affect the development of democratic processes in one or another state.It is emphasized that during the last few years, anxiety about the future of democracy has spread throughout the world. Scholars have documented a global “democratic recession” and argue that even long-established “consolidated” democracies may be losing their commitment to freedom and leaning toward more authoritarian policies.It has been determined that pro-democratic attitudes co-exist to varying degrees with openness to non-democratic forms of government, including the rule of a strong leader, experts or the military. Even in established democracies, non-democratic models find some support. Although commitment to representative democracy is relatively high in affluent, strong democracies, significant minorities in such countries are open to non-democratic alternatives.Emphasized, technocracy is a model of governance in which decision-makers are elected to office based on their expertise and expertise in a particular field. In practice, since technocrats must always be appointed by some higher authority, the political structure and incentives that influence that authority will always also play a role in the selection of technocrats.It is clear that an official who is called a technocrat may not possess the political acumen or charisma normally expected of an elected politician. Instead, a technocrat can demonstrate more pragmatic and focused problem-solving skills in the political arena.In a state where citizens are guaranteed certain rights, technocrats may seek to encroach on them if they believe that the application of their specialized knowledge will satisfy a wider range of public interests. A technocrat can make decisions based on calculations of data, not based on the impact on the population, individual citizens or sections of the population.It has been established that in the modern world we have the opportunity to observe the phenomenon of digital technocracy. Noted, technical experts, artificial intelligence, rule many areas of politics in many parts of Europe. However, EU member states differ significantly in their approaches to privacy regulation, for example, in terms of setting privacy standards.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Laniuk, Yevhen. "Technocracy as a challenge to political freedom in the digital age." Grani 24, no. 4 (April 30, 2021): 31–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.15421/172136.

Full text

Abstract:

The government of the former Prime-Minister of Ukraine Olexiy Honcharuk named itself “the government of technocrats”. This shows that the concept of technocracy becomes attractive in Ukraine. Technocracy is the form of government, which attempts to distance itself from political representation or affiliation with a particular ideology. Technocrats derive their legitimacy from their skills and expertise, and focus primarily on problem-solving and optimizing the society’s useful functions. Technocracy has always been a promising political concept. The Republic by Plato can be regarded as the first attempt to substantiate a technocratic society, in which power proceeds from the expertise of its dominant elite. Technocracy was very appealing in the industrial age, when scientific management of factories inspired the idea that society at large could be governed by similar methods. Today, digital technologies and Big Data reinvigorate the technocratic project. In this article it has been shown that technocracy, if taken too far, can be antithetical to liberal democracy and its core value – political freedom. Technocratic society resembles a corporation run by the board of directors rather than a republic of citizens. We have pointed out the factors, which make it appealing in the modern world. We then have analyzed the ideas of Howard Scott, the founder of the movement Technocracy Inc., who advocated this political model in the industrial age, and Parag Khanna, who has made similar claims about the benefits of technocracy in the digital age. It has been proven that both these thinkers share the same illiberal mindset including the common faith in the applicability of scientific methods of social management without regard for popular votes and opinions, admiration of autocratic powers of the day, and disregard for democratic procedures, which they see as hurdles on the path toward economic well-being and political domination. Finally, we asked the question: if the challenge to political freedom in Ukraine proceeds from technocracy, will it be defended in the same way as during the three Ukrainian Maidans (1990, 2004, 2014)? We deliberately leave this question unanswered, hoping that the answer will be investigated in future publications.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Aziz Sh. O, Azimli. "Technocracy as the Ideology." Humanitarian Vector 16, no. 2 (April 2021): 39–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.21209/1996-7853-2021-16-2-39-45.

Full text

Abstract:

The study examines the position of a man and society in the philosophy of technology and technocracy development that were connected with the technological progress in Europe and North America in the 19th century. The issue of relations within the “man – machine” system has become a great interest among sociologists, historians, psychologists and philosophers. The study is based on methods of analysis and synthesis of scientific writings from Plato to F. Dessauer, who referred to the important role of science and technology in the society development. The technology increasing impact on people’s lives was reflected in the emergence of technocratic concepts. They reflected the vision of technological evolution modern problems and a vision of its future development. The cornerstone of the technocracy concepts was the idea of political power transition to the technocrats’ social layer. However, during the 20th century, technocrats’ categories like scientific and technological intelligentsia, plants and factories heads, scientists and engineers did not constitute a unified political power. They were invited to discuss the economic development problems, as experts, where they were adapted to the existing political regimes rather than trying to modify them. The technocratic strata of population transformation, their political views and preferences, the impact on the socio-political situation in the country had become the main topics in the respective philosophical concepts. Thus, one important issue is man’s status in a technological society, which in turn is a relevant topic for study in the 21 st century, the century of technology. Keywords: philosophy of technology, “man – machine” system, technocracy, scientific and technological progress, political power

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Thurston, Alexander. "The Politics of Technocracy in Fourth Republic Nigeria." African Studies Review 61, no. 1 (March 5, 2018): 215–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/asr.2017.99.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract:The technocrat, a supposedly apolitical figure who joins government on the basis of technical expertise, looms large in discussions of governance. The empowerment of technocrats has sometimes been taken as a barometer for Africa’s economic and democratic progress. Rejecting this conventional wisdom, this article argues that technocrats are inevitably trapped in a web of politics—politicians leverage the apolitical image of technocrats for political gain, and public debates implicate technocrats as targets of protest. This article pursues this argument through a case study of Nigeria, where technocrats were both politicized and politicizing figures during the rule of the People’s Democratic Party between 1999 and 2015.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Salgiriev, Ali, Mair Makhaev, Fatima Dimaeva, Magomed Soltamuradov, and Vakha Gaziev. "Problems and prospects of technocratic model of government." SHS Web of Conferences 164 (2023): 00123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202316400123.

Full text

Abstract:

The paper deals with technocracy as one of the ways to organize the political life of society and variants of the state system. The paper analyzes the concept of technocracy and provides an overview of the main classical concepts of technocracy. It states that the concept of technocracy does not have an unambiguous definition, but has three basic features. Classical technocracy relies on the principle of exclusivity and the ideal of aristocratic rule laid down in Plato’s writings. The paper describes a new -deliberative model of technocracy, tailored on the principle of inclusiveness. Deliberative technocracy is a kind of technocracy by which political (and, in particular, state) decisions are taken based on expert opinion. Expert opinion is shaped following intellectual operations and is delineated in expert findings. Deliberative technocracy proclaims neither the power of abstract demos (mass men) nor the power of intellectual aristocracy. Deliberative technocracy brings a new force onto the political stage, otherwise referred to as experts. Thus, deliberative technocracy implies the majority rule, not the minority... but it is the rule of a qualified and competent majority.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

LEWANDOWSKI, Piotr. "TECHNOCRATIC TOTALITARIANISM AS A RESPONSE TO THE CRISIS OF DEMOCRACY." National Security Studies 30, no. 4 (October 18, 2023): 25–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.37055/sbn/174282.

Full text

Abstract:

The article addresses the context of the transition and evolution of post-industrial societies, in which technocracy is emerging as an alternative to traditional democracy, better able to cope with the challenges of the present day. The purpose of this article is to explore how the level of meta-analysis contributes to assessing the effectiveness of technocracy compared to democracy by analyzing the nature of the crisis of democracy, the relationship between democracy and technocracy, the advantages of technocracy over democracy, the changes required by technocracy, and the impact of technocracy on the quality of social life and political power. The research problem, therefore, is to evaluate the effectiveness of democracy versus technocracy as a political system. This study conducts a holistic and comparative analysis of technocracy, democracy and their interrelationship in the context of contemporary political systems. Technocracy, based on the optimisation of processes and data, offers long-term strategies and instant responses to social and economic change. Despite this, critics point to its lack of moral and ideological underpinnings, leading to risks such as bureaucratisation and specialisation, limiting pluralism and individual freedom. An analysis of technocracy in the context of Neil Postman's concept shows the potential risk of losing social values, authority and individual freedom due to bureaucratisation. Technocracy, as a cult of science and technology, deifies science and reifies religion, leading to totalitarianism and dehumanisation, transforming individuals into means of production and consumption. This study emphasises that technocracy is not clearly positive or negative, but a complex phenomenon. On the one hand, it can bring efficiency and social development and, on the other, lead to a loss of fundamental values and freedom. The analysis of this issue takes into account different perspectives and contexts, allowing for a fuller understanding of its implications for contemporary societies. The study presented here is an in-depth analysis of technocracy, revealing its advantages, disadvantages and the risks it poses to society. It offers a comprehensive perspective on technocracy and its relationship with democracy, shedding light on the controversial debate on the future of governance in the post-industrial era.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Fatile, Jacob Olufemi, Iyabo Olojede, and Kehindde David Adejuwon. "Techno-Bureaucratic Governance and Public Service Delivery: Indonesia and Nigeria in Perspectives." Africa’s Public Service Delivery and Performance Review 3, no. 3 (September 1, 2015): 149. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/apsdpr.v3i3.93.

Full text

Abstract:

Techno-bureaucratic governance is fundamental to contemporary public service. This is because the roles of the bureaucrats and technocrats become more relevant in policy formulation and implementation when the government had to (re)invent its institutions to move from routine administration to that of development planning and management. Utilizing a qualitative approach, the paper notes that techno-bureaucratic ideology values technical expertise itself and its technical experts, efficiency, economic development and effective public service delivery. Adopting comparative perspective, the paper examines techno-bureaucratic governance and public service delivery in Indonesia and Nigeria. The paper takes a cursory look at the similarities and differences between the two countries. The paper notes that the technocracy nurtured by the New Order in Indonesia was cohesive and effective because of its technical expertise and has helped Indonesia to turn oil income into productive investments,whereas in Nigeria the oil income was used for prestigious projects to the detriment of productive investments. The paper therefore recommend among others that developing societies need a new strategy in delivery services in their public service, and this can be achieved through skilled <br />professionals, technocrats and knowledge based actors. It concludes that for public service to deliver effective services, an efficient bureaucracy and technocracy remain invaluable.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Losonc, Alpar. "European union and the technocracy-based guardianship." Theoria, Beograd 61, no. 2 (2018): 7–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/theo1802007l.

Full text

Abstract:

The article consists of three parts. In the first part, the discussions on technocracy in the twentieth century are related to the problems of dynamics of technocracy in the European Union. In the second part, the paper tries to point to the fact that the problem of technocracy is already determined by the genesis of EU. In this section the paper articulates the special contribution of German ordoliberalism in relation to EU structures and technocratic governmentality. Specifically, the juridization and economization of politics, and the economization of constitutionality are mentioned. The third part deals with the momentum of technocracy after the crisis in 2008 and the technocracy is treated as a crisis-based guardianship. The paper concludes that given modalities of technocracy in EU are not accidental or by products; it can be derived from the genesis and structure of the EU.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Nelsen, Bonalyn J., and Beverly Burris. "Technocracy at Work." Industrial and Labor Relations Review 48, no. 4 (July 1995): 851. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2524362.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Vallas, Steven Peter, and Beverly H. Burris. "Technocracy at Work." Contemporary Sociology 23, no. 5 (September 1994): 725. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2074326.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Fischer, Frank, and Beverly H. Burris. "Technocracy at Work." Administrative Science Quarterly 39, no. 4 (December 1994): 681. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393777.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

MACK, JENNIFER. "An awkward technocracy:." American Ethnologist 46, no. 1 (January 21, 2019): 89–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/amet.12736.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Mujżel, Jan. "Democracy or Technocracy?" Eastern European Economics 26, no. 3 (March 1988): 72–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00128775.1988.11648391.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Gabriel, Sidonia. "The Technocracy Trap." perspektive mediation 14, no. 3 (2017): 153–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.33196/pm201703015301.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Zang, Xiaowei. "The Fourteenth Central Committee of the CCP: Technocracy or Political Technocracy?" Asian Survey 33, no. 8 (August 1, 1993): 787–803. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2645088.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Zang, Xiaowei. "The Fourteenth Central Committee of the CCP: Technocracy or Political Technocracy?" Asian Survey 33, no. 8 (August 1993): 787–803. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/as.1993.33.8.00p0305i.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Van Der Meer, Frits M., and Gerrit S. A. Dijkstra. "An Unbound Prometheus? Bureaucracy, Technology, Technocracy, and Administrative Innovation." Administory 6, no. 1 (December 1, 2021): 208–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/adhi-2022-0008.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract We will focus on the intensifying technologization of government affairs and the ensuing question: does this lead to a bureaucratically dominated technocracy? The coining of the concept of ›technocracy‹ is attributed to the engineer William Henry Smyth in 1919: »The rule of the people made effective through the agency of their servants, the scientists and engineers«. We will examine past and present debates on possible adverse effects of technocracy on the scope for democratic governance and thus the position of political leaders and citizens in decision making.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Obermeyer, Nancy J. "The Hidden GIS Technocracy." Cartography and Geographic Information Systems 22, no. 1 (January 1995): 78–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1559/152304095782540609.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Predeyna, M. "ROMANTICISM, TECHNOCRACY AND CITIZEN." Scientific notes of Taurida National V.I. Vernadsky University, series Philosophy, no. 1 (2020): 35–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.32838/2709-2933/2020.1/07.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Farukshin, M. "Technocracy: Hopes and Risks." Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, no. 5 (May 2019): 76–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.31857/s013216250004959-7.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Davies, Gareth. "The Crisis of Technocracy." Amsterdam Law Forum 1, no. 3 (April 26, 2009): 23. http://dx.doi.org/10.37974/alf.71.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Cocioc, Paul. "Competition, Technocracy and Inequality." Virgil Madgearu Review of Economic Studies and Research 13, no. 2 (November 23, 2020): 51–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.24193/rvm.2020.13.60.

Full text

Abstract:

The article present a brief analyze of theoretical virtues of free competition in relation with some visible limits and negative consequences observed in real economic life. Social intervention to correct (at least in part) those social failures and the new responses of the firms are discussed too. Possible motivations of these new actions are presented in connection with technocratic model of firm management. It seems that the model of professionalization of firm leadership created not only a new structure within the category of the intermediaries (one with extremely high powers), but later generated new interests typical for a social category. The intermediary develops his own agenda and seeks to control not only the market but also the business owners (which is possible in the conditions of the fragmentation of the large property). They have the power to distort and undermine normal competition (or at least to try it) and that conduct to some practices at legal and ethical borderline.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

SINGH, RAMANDEEP, and ANNA ALEXANDROVA. "Happiness economics as technocracy." Behavioural Public Policy 4, no. 2 (January 14, 2020): 236–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2019.46.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractHappiness economics as advocated by Frijters et al. makes three assumptions: that policy should be based on facts about the net effect of a factor on happiness; that wellbeing policy should be technocratic and centralized; and that the only credible objections come from critics who do not value happiness. We argue that all three should be rejected and that the science and policy of wellbeing should instead be pluralistic, context-sensitive and participatory.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Outhwaite, William. "The lure of technocracy." Cambridge Review of International Affairs 28, no. 4 (August 18, 2015): 757–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2015.1076633.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Horton, Richard. "Offline: The coming technocracy." Lancet 396, no. 10266 (December 2020): 1869. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)32668-4.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Calow, Peter. "Technocracy Turns People Off." Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 16, no. 1 (January 2020): 8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4226.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Tapio, Petri. "From technocracy to participation?" Futures 28, no. 5 (June 1996): 453–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(96)00019-5.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Burris, Beverly H. "Technocratic Organization and Control." Organization Studies 10, no. 1 (January 1989): 1–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/017084068901000101.

Full text

Abstract:

Technocracy, a new type of organizational control structure, is defined and analyzed. The culmination of a dialectical process of organizational rationalization, technocracy transcends and integrates earlier forms of organizational control, particularly technical control, bureaucratic control, and professional control. Technocratic organizations are characterized by a flattening of bureaucratic hierarchies, a polarization into 'expert' and 'non-expert' sectors, a substitution of expertise for rank position as the primary basis of authority, a de-emphasis on internal job ladders in favour of external credentialing and credential barriers, flexible configurations of centralization/decentralization, and other related organizational changes. Technocracy is analyzed with regard to its theoretical background, historical development, contemporary manifestations, and socio-political implications.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Reiser, Marion, and Jörg Hebenstreit. "Populism versus Technocracy? Populist Responses to the Technocratic Nature of the EU." Politics and Governance 8, no. 4 (December 17, 2020): 568–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3361.

Full text

Abstract:

While populism and technocracy have attracted enormous scientific attention in recent years, surprisingly how the two concepts relate to each other has rarely been investigated. Looking at the case of the EU, we investigate how populist parties position themselves in relation to technocracy in general and the technocratic nature of EU institutions in particular. In a first theoretical step, we identify the core elements, modes of governance, and policy output of technocratic governance and use them to derive potential responses of populist parties. In the empirical part, we investigate these aspects of technocracy by applying quantitative and qualitative approaches using the 2019 European election manifestos of 12 populist parties. We show that left- and right-wing populist parties articulate anti-technocratic positions, particularly regarding the core elements of technocratic governance. The concrete technocratic critique differs regarding the respective host ideology. However, within the group of hybrid populist parties, ANO 2011 and GERB appear not to have a critical stance towards technocracy and thus can be classified as technocratic populist parties.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Dmitry, Kovalev. "Transformation of the Ideology of Technocracy as the Determinant of the Imperial Project of Globalization." Almanac “Essays on Conservatism” 2 (May 27, 2022): 270–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.24030/24092517-2022-0-2-270-276.

Full text

Abstract:

Globalization is the project of a new type of world empire, eliminating civilizational-state sovereignty through technicalization and virtualization of social relations, social institutions and culture, and establishing of special forms of hierarchy. In the ideological evolution of technocracy, which integrated bureaucracy and management, one can distinguish several stages, the implementation of which made it possible to replace the “state – science – technology” value triad with the “TNK – science – technology” triad. The manipulative inconsistency of the ideology of technocracy, its diversity, instrumentality and ability to transform is most clearly manifested in the framework of transmodernism as the dialectical synthesis of industrial technocracy and postmodernism, imitating the absence of coherent ideology and system of goals.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Litwack, Eric B. "Wittgensteinian Humanism, Democracy, and Technocracy." Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 22, no. 3 (2018): 314–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/techne2018111486.

Full text

Abstract:

In this article, the author explores some possible applications of Wittgenstein’s humanistic psychology, epistemology and philosophy of culture for the philosophy of technology, and more particularly, for the question of valuing a possible future technocracy over contemporary democratic systems. Major aspects of the article involve a discussion of some of Wittgenstein’s key views on certainty, cultural relativism, the problem of other minds, and gradual socio-cultural change. In order to examine these problems, the author draws from both a wide range of Wittgenstein’s works, as well as secondary sources in Wittgenstein studies. An analogy is made between socio-cultural change over time and gradual visual loss. The author has incorporated important elements of Wittgenstein’s biography, both as a philosopher and as an engineer and architect, underlining the profound link between his life and thought.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Mushakoji, Kinhide. "From technocracy back to humanism." World Futures 40, no. 1-3 (July 1994): 75–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02604027.1994.9972419.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Ginty, Roger Mac. "Routine peace: Technocracy and peacebuilding." Cooperation and Conflict 47, no. 3 (August 22, 2012): 287–308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0010836712444825.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Rockman, Bert A. "Bureaucracy Between Populism and Technocracy." Administration & Society 51, no. 10 (September 18, 2019): 1546–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0095399719874758.

Full text

Abstract:

Democratic institutions were on the rise in the 1990s but in many instances are under stress currently threatened by populist authoritarianism. The independence of the civil service, of the courts, and of the press is under various levels of threat in many countries including long-established liberal democracies. This article explores the causes and consequences of this threat particularly for the ability of governments to function effectively and lawfully.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Mattei, Clara Elisabetta. "Keynesianism, technocracy and class struggle." Journal of Cultural Economy 11, no. 5 (May 7, 2018): 476–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2018.1466189.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Jaques, Elliot. "Social Therapy: Technocracy or Collaboration?" Journal of Social Issues 3, no. 2 (April 14, 2010): 59–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1947.tb01492.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Dillard, Jesse F., and Beverly H. Burris. "Technocracy and management control systems." Accounting, Management and Information Technologies 3, no. 3 (July 1993): 151–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0959-8022(93)90014-w.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

CARAMANI, DANIELE. "Will vs. Reason: The Populist and Technocratic Forms of Political Representation and Their Critique to Party Government." American Political Science Review 111, no. 1 (February 2017): 54–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0003055416000538.

Full text

Abstract:

The article compares analytically populism and technocracy as alternative forms of political representation to party government. It argues that populist and technocratic principles of representation challenge fundamental features of party democracy. The two alternative forms of representation are addressed theoretically from the perspective of political representation. First, the article identifies the commonalities between the two forms of representation: both populism and technocracy are based on a unitary, nonpluralist, unmediated, and unaccountable vision of society's general interest. Second, it highlights their differences. Technocracy stresses responsibility and requires voters to entrust authority to experts who identify the general interest from rational speculation. Populism stresses responsiveness and requires voters to delegate authority to leaders who equate the general interest with a putative will of the people. While the populist form of representation has received considerable attention, the technocratic one has been neglected. The article presents a more complete picture of the analytical relationship between them.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Ouyang, Guangwei. "Scientism, Technocracy, and Morality in China." Journal of Chinese Philosophy 30, no. 2 (February 1, 2003): 177–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15406253-03002003.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Contreras Acevedo, Ramiro. "Habermas, Jürgen, The Lure of Technocracy." Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional 1, no. 16 (January 1, 2016): 597. http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/iij.24487872e.2016.16.540.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Heydebrand, Wolf, and Frank Fischer. "Technocracy and the Politics of Expertise." Contemporary Sociology 20, no. 3 (May 1991): 395. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2073702.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Burris, Beverly H. "Technocracy and Gender in the Workplace." Social Problems 36, no. 2 (April 1989): 165–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/sp.1989.36.2.03a00050.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Burris, Beverly H. "Technocracy and Gender in the Workplace." Social Problems 36, no. 2 (April 1989): 165–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/800806.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Deleon, Peter, and Frank Fischer. "Technocracy and the Politics of Expertise." Public Productivity & Management Review 15, no. 4 (1992): 506. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3380637.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Bella, David A., Charles D. Mosher, and Steven N. Calvo. "Technocracy and Trusts: Nuclear Waste Controversy." Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering 114, no. 1 (January 1988): 27–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1052-3928(1988)114:1(27).

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Smith, Michael G. "Marx, technocracy, and the corporatist ethos." Studies in Soviet Thought 36, no. 4 (November 1988): 233–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02342284.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Ryan, Phil. "“Technocracy,” democracy … and corruption and trust." Policy Sciences 51, no. 1 (November 11, 2017): 131–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11077-017-9305-1.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Ouyang, Guangwei. "Scientism, Technocracy, and Morality in China." Journal of Chinese Philosophy 30, no. 2 (June 2003): 177–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-6253.00113.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Sassower, Raphael. "Medical Technology: Indicator of Modern Technocracy." Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 6, no. 1 (February 1986): 53–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/027046768600600111.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Bickerton, Christopher, and Carlo Invernizzi Accetti. "Populism and technocracy: opposites or complements?" Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 20, no. 2 (April 7, 2015): 186–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2014.995504.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!