Academic literature on the topic 'Ten years later (Television program)'

Ogles, B. M., K. S. Masters, and V. W. Gurney. "ADULT FITNESS PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS TEN YEARS LATER 802." Medicine &amp Science in Sports &amp Exercise 28, Supplement (May 1996): 135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005768-199605001-00800.

Demyanovich, Corinne, and Courtney Jones. "Book Bonanza! Celebrating Ten Years of the Bookapalooza Program." Children and Libraries 15, no. 4 (December 1, 2017): 30. http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/cal.15.4.30.

Stack, Lois Berg. "Interactive Television Delivers Master Gardener Training Effectively." HortTechnology 7, no. 4 (October 1997): 357–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.21273/horttech.7.4.357.

Kooijman, Jaap. "I Want My MTV, We Want Our TMF." VIEW Journal of European Television History and Culture 6, no. 11 (September 22, 2017): 93. http://dx.doi.org/10.18146/2213-0969.2017.jethc126.

Valkenburg, Patti M., Marcel W. Vooijs, Tom H. A. van der Voort, and Oene Wiegman. "The Influence of Television on Children's Fantasy Styles: A Secondary Analysis." Imagination, Cognition and Personality 12, no. 1 (September 1992): 55–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/99qn-1ecb-g7f0-je6e.

Vida, Stephen, Johanne Monette, Machelle Wilchesky, Michèle Monette, Ruby Friedman, Anh Nguyen, Dolly Dastoor, et al. "A long-term care center interdisciplinary education program for antipsychotic use in dementia: program update five years later." International Psychogeriatrics 24, no. 4 (November 30, 2011): 599–605. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1041610211002225.

Barham, Tania, Karen Macours, and John A. Maluccio. "Boys' Cognitive Skill Formation and Physical Growth: Long-Term Experimental Evidence on Critical Ages for Early Childhood Interventions." American Economic Review 103, no. 3 (May 1, 2013): 467–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.3.467.

Moon, John T., Patrick E. Guinan, David J. Snider, and Anthony R. Lupo. "CoCoRaHs in Missouri: Four Years Later, the Importance of Observations." Transactions of the Missouri Academy of Science 43, no. 2009 (January 1, 2009): 8–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.30956/0544-540x-43.2009.8.

BRUYNOOGHE, MAURICE, and KUNG-KIU LAU. "Special issue on ‘Program development’." Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 2, no. 4-5 (July 2002): 423–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1471068402001424.

Sheehan, Mary, Cynthia Schonfeld, Rod Ballard, Frank Schofield, Jackob Najman, and Victor Siskind. "A Three Year Outcome Evaluation of a Theory Based Drink Driving Education Program." Journal of Drug Education 26, no. 3 (September 1996): 295–312. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/rprv-7gp1-xh7f-3lhn.

Hodge, Cherise A. "Virginia's Instructional Technology Resource Teacher Program: Ten Years Later, What We Know, -Where Do We Need to Go?" VCU Scholars Compass, 2017. http://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/4731.

Good eats 3: The later years. New York: Stewart, Tabori & Chang, 2011.

Trevor, McDonald, ed. News at Ten: A celebration of 32 years of television news. London: Boxtree, 1999.

David, Stanley. News at ten: A celebration of 32 years of television news. London: Boxtree, 1999.

Allcock, Thomas Tunstall. Thomas C. Mann. University Press of Kentucky, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.5810/kentucky/9780813176154.001.0001.

Hall, Joe B., and Marianne Walker. Coach Hall. University Press of Kentucky, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.5810/kentucky/9780813178561.001.0001.

Ames, Melissa. "Screening Terror." In Small Screen, Big Feels, 21–41. University Press of Kentucky, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.5810/kentucky/9780813180069.003.0002.

Burks, Arthur W. "An Early Graduate Program in Computers and Communications." In Perspectives on Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. Oxford University Press, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195162929.003.0010.

Goldstein, Inge F., and Martin Goldstein. "Childhood Leukemia Near Nuclear Plants." In How Much Risk? Oxford University Press, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195139945.003.0009.

Copeland, Jack. "Baby." In The Turing Guide. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198747826.003.0029.

"Introductory Overview." In Climate Variability and Ecosystem Response in Long-Term Ecological Research Sites, edited by David Greenland, Douglas G. Goodin, and Raymond C. Smith. Oxford University Press, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195150599.003.0006.

"operations following the 1986 deregulation of the French television market. Since the buyers declined to comment, it might be fair to let the selling agent have the last word: “Viewers have been bluffed by vandals . . . . They were not passionate enough” (Cousin 1992). It’s inescapable. Every channel needs to create a regular and loyal audience without spending too much on doing so. There aren’t a thousand different solutions. I’ll bet you that in ten years every channel will run one or two soaps. The question is: will they be French or bought in from other countries? (Cousin, quoted by Pélégrin 1989: 37) Conclusions The major conclusion will already be clear, namely that importing countries’ cultural and televisual norms, especially the contours of their “soapscapes,” constitute the crucial determinant of the success or otherwise of an imported soap. Massive success is predicated, as for Neighbours in Britain, upon the recognizability/acceptability of the textual features described above; upon such favorable – and sometimes fortuitous – cultural and institutional features as Kylie Minogue’s singing career and the expansion of British tabloids; and upon the acceptability of difference across such axes as weather, accent, and home-ownership. Culturally and televisually, Britain is far closer to Australia than are the other two territories. In the USA and France, given the time taken to build a soap audience, Neighbours barely achieved the threshold of visibility which would have enabled its potentially attractive textual features to come into play with viewers. In both countries, executive decisions to cut the program arose from the challenging, deregulationary ethos of the late 1980s. A second conclusion concerns the conceptualization of audiences. In writing of audiences as defined by various nation states I have, of necessity, homogenized hugely diverse audience responses. As I have argued elsewhere, to hypostatize the national is to deny both the subnational and the supranational (Crofts 1993). What is entailed in this essay, on this topic, is the necessity to work at a certain level of abstraction. There is no contradiction between such work and that of Marie Gillespie in this collection (Chapter 18). Methodologically, journalistic commentary and interviews with buyers and sellers are as appropriate to the former as are surveys of, participant and non-participant observation of, and interviews with viewers to Gillespie’s ethnographic research into the social use-value of Neighbours for Punjabi youth in the outer London suburb of Southall. Macro- and micro-levels of research are both valuable and complementary." In To Be Continued..., 128. Routledge, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203131855-30.

"In France, Neighbours, dubbed as Les voisins, was launched by Antenne 2 in August 1989. Screened twice daily at 11:30 and 5:45, it secured ratings of 24 per cent of the market, in fact Antenne 2’s average for that year. However, for reasons which Antenne 2 is unwilling to disclose, the evening screening was shifted after only ten editions to 6:30. This put it up against stronger competition from others of the then five channels, and its rating dropped to just below 16 percent of market share. A further scheduling change briefly preceded its demise after a total of only seven months’ screening. The 185 episodes purchased only just included the debut of Kylie Minogue at episode 169. According to its French agent, Rolande Cousin, Antenne 2 bought Neighbours exclusively on the basis of its colossal British success (Cousin 1992), a phenomenon mentioned by all six articles heralding Neighbours’s arrival on French screens; its Australian success was referred to by four articles (Baron 1989; Brugière 1989; Lepetit 1989; Pélégrin 1989; Thomann 1989; and A.W. 1989). The Minogue factor also appears significant. Her singing career peaked in 1988–1989, and among the six articles she rated one cover story (Télé 7 jours), an exclusive interview and a cover story with Jason Donovan (in Télé poche), and two other references (Brugière 1989; and Thomann 1989). Cousin identifies five other potential appeals in the program for French viewers: its sun, its “acceptable exoticism,” its lack of blacks (a sensitive topic in France, as witness the racist political career of Jean-Marie Le Pen), its lack of other disturbing social material, and its everyday issues (Cousin 1992). For all this potential appeal, Antenne 2 still delayed transmitting by three months, pushing its opening into August, when most of France goes on holiday, and opted instead for the American Top Models (Baron 1989: 25). This lack of confidence in its purchase instances what Cousin called a “Pavlovian reflex” against non-US serial fiction (Cousin 1992), and points to broader issues than the fame of two of the program’s principals. The French commentaries differ noticeably from the American in their assessment of the ten textual features of Neighbours singled out above. One feature – women as doers – is not mentioned at all. All other features are mentioned at least once. The two most often referred to are the everyday, and the domestic and suburban. But Neighbours’s non-exceptionality, its everyday realism, had a different status for French than for American reviewers. For most of the latter it offered a desirable antidote to the spectacular confections of home-grown soaps. For French reviewers it was treated in one of two ways. While some derogated the program’s perceived banality (Brugière 1989; Pélégrin 1989), others, whether high(er) brow or plugging the Minogue factor, remained curiously non-committal about its everyday realism. There was a similarly curious abstention from either positive or negative evaluation of the program. Commentators’ apparent unease with this centrally distinguishing feature of Neighbours, its everyday realism, suggests that it represented something of a conundrum in the mediascape, in particular the field of television serial fiction screened in France, and may well echo the unease evidently felt by its buyer. The reasons require some clarification." In To Be Continued..., 125. Routledge, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203131855-27.

"Max Ramsay is the cardboard cutout Ozzie clod who warns his son, Shane, against dating Daphne because she works as a stag-night stripper. His main fear seems to be the effect the newly arrived Daphne might have on the price of his property. (Smurthwaite 1986) As Grahame Griffin notes, “the closing credit sequence . . . is a series of static shots of suburban houses singled out for display in a manner reminiscent of real estate advertisements” (Griffin 1991: 175). Small business abounds in Neighbours: a bar, a boutique, an engineering company, with no corporate sector and no public servants or bureaucrats apart from a headmistress. 10 Writing skills must be acknowledged. It is very hard to make the mundane interesting, and indeed to score multiple short plot lines across a small number of characters (twelve to fifteen), as is appropriate to representing the local, the everyday, the suburban. As Moira Petty remarks, Neighbours is successful because “it’s very simple. The characters are two dimensional and the plots come thick and fast. The storylines don’t last long, so if you don’t like one, another will come along in a few days” (quoted by Harris 1988). These ten textual reasons doubtless contribute, differentially across different export markets, to Neighbours’s success in many countries of the world. Its wholesome neighborliness, its cosy everyday ethos would appear to be eminently exportable. However, lest it be imagined that Neighbours has universal popularity or even comprehensibility, there remain some 150 countries to which it has not been exported, and many in which its notions of kinship systems, gender relations, and cultural spaces would appear most odd. The non-universality of western kinship relations, for example, is clearly evidenced in Elihu Katz and Tamar Liebes’s comparison of Israeli and Arab readings of Dallas (Katz and Leibes 1986). And, indeed, there are two familiar territories to be considered later – the USA and France – in which it has been screened and failed. Significantly, the countries screening Neighbours are mostly anglophone and well familiar with British, if not also with Australian soaps. But why does Neighbours appeal so forcibly in the UK? In the UK market, I suggest, five institutional and cultural preconditions enabled Neighbours’s phenomenal success. Some of these considerations are, of course, the sine qua non of Neighbours even being seen on UK television. The first precondition was its price, reportedly A$54,000 per show for two screenings; with EastEnders costing A$80,000 per episode, Neighbours was well worth a gamble (Kingsley 1989: 241). Scheduling, too, was vital to Neighbours’s success. This has two dimensions. Neighbours was the first program on UK television ever to be stripped over five weekdays (Patterson 1992). BBC Daytime Television, taking off under Roger Loughton in 1986, while Michael Grade was Programme Controller, was so bold in this as to incur the chagrin of commercial." In To Be Continued..., 112. Routledge, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203131855-14.

Deissenboeck, Florian, and Markus Pizka. "Concise and Consistent Naming: Ten Years Later." In 2015 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC). IEEE, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icpc.2015.9.

Gregory, Phillip C. "WIPP: A Perspective From Ten Years of Operating Success." In ASME 2009 12th International Conference on Environmental Remediation and Radioactive Waste Management. ASMEDC, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/icem2009-16189.

Bos, Mark, Olger Koop, and Ernst Bolt. "Safety Level of a Probabilistic Admittance Policy." In ASME 2011 30th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. ASMEDC, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/omae2011-49357.

Gravely, Michael, Bruce La Belle, and John Balachandra. "Independent Assessment of the Energy Savings, Environmental Improvements and Water Conservation of Emerging Non-Chemical Water Treatment Technologies." In ASME 2010 Citrus Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/cec2010-5602.