Relevant bibliographies by topics / Territoriality principle

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters

Academic literature on the topic 'Territoriality principle'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 1 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Territoriality principle.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Territoriality principle"

1

DE SCHUTTER, HELDER. "The Linguistic Territoriality Principle — A Critique." Journal of Applied Philosophy 25, no. 2 (May 2008): 105–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.2008.00397.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Synodinou, Tatiana Eleni. "Geoblocking in EU Copyright Law: Challenges and Perspectives." GRUR International 69, no. 2 (January 30, 2020): 136–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikaa001.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract EU copyright law has attempted to resolve the antithesis between the ideal of the single market and the concept of copyright territoriality through a modest approach, which is based on the axiom of safeguarding copyright territoriality and of the accompanying geoblocking practices. The aim of this article is to critically analyse the EU’s steps towards the circumvention of the principle of territoriality and of geoblocking and to demonstrate that, as the efforts to create a digital single market are intensified, a strict EU geoblocking policy in relation to services offering access to copyright-protected works cannot be retained. The article is divided into three parts. Part one is dedicated to the consequences of the principle of territoriality on European copyright law (II). Part two is dedicated to the steps, both jurisprudential and legislative, which have been taken to move away from the principle of copyright territoriality at the European level (III). Part three is dedicated to the recently adopted Geoblocking Regulation 2018/302, while possible ways to move forward are also analysed (IV).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Jakubowski, Andrzej. "Territoriality and State Succession in Cultural Heritage." International Journal of Cultural Property 21, no. 4 (November 2014): 375–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0940739114000277.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract:The international legal discourse on the topic of state succession in cultural property has long been dominated by the concept of territoriality—the territorial provenance (origin) of cultural assets. This traditional reasoning was essentially rooted in the idea of the European nation-state. In the last 50 years, the principle of territoriality has also become accommodated within the framework of the preservation of cultural heritage. Yet such territorial and protective approaches do not take into account the value of cultural heritage for society, that is, groups and individuals that have created or maintained a given heritage. This article attempts to explore the potential clash between the principles of territoriality and human rights, with respect to state succession in cultural heritage matters. In this context, it deals with some recent ongoing interstate negotiations on the allocation of and access to cultural property with respect to post–World War II developments in state succession among Poland, Germany, and Ukraine.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Dembinska, Magdalena, László Máracz, and Márton Tonk. "Introduction to the special section: minority politics and the territoriality principle in Europe." Nationalities Papers 42, no. 3 (May 2014): 355–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2013.867934.

Full text
Abstract:
Territorial arrangements for managing interethnic relations within states are far from consensual. Although self-governance for minorities is commonly advocated, international documents are ambiguously formulated. Conflicting pairs of principles, territoriality vs. personality, and self-determination vs. territorial integrity, along with diverging state interests account for this gap. Together, the articles in this special section address the territoriality principle and its hardly operative practice on the ground, with particular attention to European cases. An additional theme reveals itself in the articles: the ambiguity of minority recognition politics. This introductory article briefly presents these two common themes, followed by an outline of three recent proposals discussed especially in Eastern Europe that seek to bypass the controversial territorial autonomy model: cultural rights in municipalities with a “substantial” proportion of minority members; the cultural autonomy model; and European regionalism and multi-level governance.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Vizi, Balázs. "Territoriality and Minority Language Rights." International Journal on Minority and Group Rights 23, no. 4 (November 18, 2016): 429–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718115-02304006.

Full text
Abstract:
Territorial principle emerges not only in domestic legislations on language rights, but also in international documents. The article aims at offering an overview of the interpretations of territoriality in international documents relevant for minority language rights, with a special focus on the European Charter for Regional and Minority Languages and the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities. While states often use territorial requirements as a tool of political control over minority language use, the interpretation of their obligations under the two Council of Europe treaties would require a more practical and technical approach to territorial limitations.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Csata, Zsombor. "Linguistic Justice and English as a Lingua Franca from a Minority Perspective." Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, European and Regional Studies 9, no. 1 (October 1, 2016): 83–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/auseur-2016-0012.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract The article is a brief evaluation of the regulatory environment of language use in Transylvania, Romania based on Van Parijs’ conceptual toolkit presented in his 2011 book Linguistic Justice for Europe and for the World. This linguistic regime is a coercive hybrid regulation containing elements stemming from both the categorical regime (personality principle) and territoriality. In municipalities or counties where the official use of minority languages is permitted, it is typically present in a conjunctive manner, but its enforcement is weak and inconsistent. The principle of territorially coercive linguistic subdivision – proposed by Van Parijs as an optimal solution for a greater linguistic justice – is not accommodated in any of the fields of official communication and under present political circumstances it has no further plausibility. A hypothetical alternative for the territorially coercive regime would be the introduction of English as a lingua franca in interethnic communication. We argued that this latter option would be fair only if English could entirely replace the official languages currently in use or it would receive a fully equivalent status at least in those regions where a considerable number of linguistic minorities live.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Agudo González, Jorge. "La superación del paradigma territorial y sus efectos en el Derecho Administrativo. Bases normativas del Derecho Administrativo transnacional // The overcoming of territorial paradigm and its effects in Administrative Law. Normative Basis of Transnational Administrative Law." Revista de Derecho Político 1, no. 103 (December 16, 2018): 155. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/rdp.103.2018.23200.

Full text
Abstract:
Resumen:El Derecho Administrativo aborda con creciente frecuencia fenómenos jurídicos que podemos denominar como «transnacionales». Esta calificación se debe a que no son susceptibles de una ordenación integral por el Derecho Administrativo estatal. En este estudio abordamos el análisis de esos fenómenos jurídicos desde la perspectiva del principio de territorialidad. El objetivo es mostrar los efectos de la incompatibilidad de fenómenos inherentes a la globalización con el paradigma de la territorialidad del Derecho Administrativo y su concepción estatutaria como Derecho del Estado. El estudio comienza con una exposición sobre la trascendencia del principio de territorialidad en la Teoría General del Estado y en la Teoría jurídica; esta parte analiza la relevancia del territorio como base y límite del poder público, y en las relaciones con otros ordenamientos. A continuación, el estudio aborda los fenómenos jurídicos alumbrados en el contexto actual de fragmentación y pluralismo jurídico, para mostrar una realidad jurídica que condiciona la capacidad explicativa del principio de territorialidad. La constatación de la superación del paradigma territorial del Derecho Administrativo provoca la necesidad de afrontar las consecuencias de ese panorama jurídico transformador. El estudio muestra cómo la desterritorialización del Derecho tiene implicaciones directas no sólo en las relaciones entre órdenes normativos, sino también en la summa divisio, al igual que en la vis autoritaria que tradicionalmente ha caracterizado al Derecho Administrativo. Estas transformaciones abren paso a un Derecho Administrativo no exclusivamente estatal, basado en relaciones interordinamentales y focalizado en relaciones jurídicas dinámicas. SummaryI. Introduction. II. The Territoriality Principle in the State General Theory and in the Legal Theory. 1. The territoriality and exclusivity principles of sovereign power. 2. State law «toward outward». 2.1. Foundations of international law. 2.2. Conflicts of laws and private international Law. III. The Loss of Centrality of the Territoriality Principle. 1. The overcoming of the exclusivity of State law. 1.1. Legal fragmentation and international (private) «norms». 1.2. Administrativelaw is international law and vice versa. 1.3. Relations between State legal orders. 2. The overcoming of the division public law versus private law. IV. Final Remarks: the «Relational Character» of the Transnational Administrative Law. 1. From the exclusivity and the completness of the State Administrative Law to the relations between legal orders and conflicts of law. 2. From an authoritarian conception centered in static legal status, to a conception ex parte civium and focused on dynamic legal relationships. Abstract:Administrative Law is increasingly tackling with legal phenomena that can be named as «transnational». This denomination is due to the fact that cannot be embraced entirely by State Administrative Law. In this paper we approach the analysis of these legal phenomena from the perspective of the territoriality principle. The objective of this paper is to show the effects of the incompatibility of a legal phenomenon inherent to globalization, with the paradigm of the territoriality of Administrative Law and its statutory conception as State law. The study begins with an exposition on the relevance of the territoriality principle in the State General Theory and in the Legal Theory; for this reason, we analyze the relevance of the territory as the basis and limit of public power, but also in the relations other legal orders. Then the study deals with the current context of fragmentation and legal pluralism to show a legal reality that undermines the explanatory capacity of the territoriality principle. The verification of the overcoming of the territorial paradigm of Administrative Law causes the need to face the consequences of this transforming legal reality. The paper shows to what extent the deterritorialization of law has direct implications not only in the relations between legal orders, but also in the «summa divisio» and in the traditional authoritarian characterization of Administrative Law. These changes open the scene to a non-statist legal regime, based on relations between legal orders and focused on dynamic legal relations.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Shakhnazarov, B. A. "General Object and Special Object Principles of the Legal Regulation of Industrial Property in Cross-Border Relations." Lex Russica 73, no. 10 (October 23, 2020): 41–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2020.167.10.041-062.

Full text
Abstract:
International agreements, as well as the national legislation of various States, in addition to the territorial principle of protection of industrial property, the principle of national treatment, the principle of convention or exhibition priority, do not specifically identify other principles of protection of industrial property that would uniform national legislation in the field of protection of industrial property in most aspects of protection, and that would also take into account the specifics of a particular object of protection. The paper distinguishes and formulates general object principles of protection of industrial property, not expressly enshrined in international agreements, as well as special object principles of protection of individual objects of industrial property. It is noted that the operation of general principles applied universally for protection of all objects of industrial property and historically established universal principles of national regime, territoriality, principles of convention and exhibition priority are supplemented by such general object principles as the principle of exclusive protection of industrial property, the principle of production and technical development. These principles can be considered general in view of their extension to other objects not expressly specified in the Paris Convention. At the same time, with regard to separate objects (groups of objects) of industrial property, one can determine special object principles of protection on the ground of their specificity.The author applies formal legal and comparative legal methods of the study, on the basis of which special international principles of protection were formulated: the principle of exclusive protection, the principle of focus on production and technical development. The paper describes special principles of protection for individual objects: the declarative and evidentiary principle of protection of registered industrial property, the principle of protection of marks “such as they are”, the principle of protection of new creative results in relation to patentable objects, the principle of absolute nature of the rights certified by the patent.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Djordjevic, Dejan, and Tijana Dabovic. "Mondialization: The negation of territory." Glasnik Srpskog geografskog drustva 87, no. 2 (2007): 165–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/gsgd0702165d.

Full text
Abstract:
The main objective of this paper is to present some weaknesses and inconsistence of the mondialization/globalization concept, especially regarding obvious negation of territoriality as a principle and a crude reality of uneven spatial distribution of resources, wealth and population on global scale. The domination of the globalism and neo-liberalism in the spheres of economy, society, culture and even language leads toward greater differences, in such intensity that some authors describe it as a "clash of civilizations". Loosing territoriality means loosing "raison d?etre" of spatial planning. Some efforts to introduce participation as a planning solution for the beginning of the new century is actually a Trojan horse and a step in the wrong direction.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Cole, Rowland JV. "Validating the Normative Value and Legal Recognition of the Principle of Equality of Arms in Criminal Proceedings in Botswana." Journal of African Law 56, no. 1 (December 21, 2011): 68–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0021855311000222.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThe principle of equality of arms is firmly entrenched in the jurisprudence of international tribunals, but hardly at all in domestic systems. This article argues for the principle to be applied in Botswana's adversarial system, as a way of ensuring procedural equality and enhancing fair trials. After examining the normative value of the principle, the article refers to a number of domestic jurisdictions that have applied the principle. It also examines the general acceptability of equality and fairness in Botswana case law. This represents a foundation for applying the principle in Botswana. The principle was developed by the European Court of Human Rights, creating its own concept of fairness in trials, irrespective of the position in domestic systems. Since the principle is of international origin, it is necessary to note that “judicial territoriality” and Botswana's dualist system do not pose obstacles to the application of the principle.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Territoriality principle"

1

Havlíková, Barbora. "Territorial Copyright Licenses for Audio-visual Content:Steps Towards Overruling the Principle of Copyright Territoriality?" Thesis, Uppsala universitet, Juridiska institutionen, 2020. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-413118.

Full text
Abstract:
The thesis evaluates the  competition law and new legislation adopted under the Digital Single Market Strategy framework and itf effect on the principle of copyright territoriality and current territorial licensing practices. The interest of consumers to access cultural content, the interest of right holders to exploit their work in exchange for renumeration and interest of distributors to secure a broader audience and high income are interests which are taken into account. The thesis discusses how the EU legislation reflects and balance these interests. The thesis also discusses the role of principle of copyright territoriality for business and financial practices in the audio-visual industry.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Rugsveen, Terese, and Sofia Norström. "Territorialitetsprincipens ställning som rättfärdigandegrund i EG-rätten : En utredning baserad på etableringsfriheten i artiklarna 43 EG och 48 EG." Thesis, Jönköping University, JIBS, Commercial Law, 2006. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-372.

Full text
Abstract:

Den internationella rätten utgörs av mellanstatliga samarbeten mellan suveräna stater på olika områden. De suveräna staterna har exklusiv behörighet att lagstifta inom sina territorier och således har ingen annan stat rätt att stifta lagar som blir gällande på en annans stats territorium. Denna exklusiva rätt till självbestämmande benämns territorialitetsprincipen. På den internationella skatterättens område innebär territorialitetsprincipen att en stat har rätt att beskatta all inkomst som har ett samband med den staten. Detta görs genom att obegränsat skattskyldiga beskattas för all sin inkomst oavsett var den uppstått och begränsat skattskyldiga beskattas endast för den inkomst som uppkommit i den staten.

Då en självständig stat överlämnar en del av sin suveränitet till ett sådant internationellt samarbete som till exempel EG utgör, splittras det i internationell rätt vedertagna territorialitetsbegreppet eftersom den exklusiva lagstiftningskompetensen i viss mån måste delas med EG: s lagstiftande makt. Etableringsfriheten som stadgas i artiklarna 43 EG och 48 EG utgör en del av de åtaganden som medlemsstaterna måste beakta efter inträdet i EG. Medlemsstaterna får därigenom inte i sin nationella lagstiftning ha åtgärder som inskränker gemenskapsmedborgares och bolags rätt till fri etablering. Med tanke på att beaktandet av EG-rätten föranleder att territorialitetsbegreppet splittras kan det ifrågasättas om territorialitetsprincipen har någon ställning i EG-rätten. Härav är det även av intresse att utreda hu-ruvida territorialitetsprincipen kan utgöra en självständig rättfärdigandegrund av nationellt inskränkande åtgärder som anses strida mot etableringsfriheten.

Trots att det råder osäkerhet kring huruvida territorialitetsprincipen utgör en självständig rättfärdigandegrund eller inte åberopar medlemsstater principen på grund av att EG-domstolen erkänt principen i ett mål rörande etableringsfrihet. Därav kan territorialitetsprincipens ställning som rättfärdigandegrund inte enkelt avfärdas.

Vi anser dock inte att territorialitetsprincipen har en ställning som självständig rättfärdigandegrund av nationell lagstiftning som inskränker etableringsfriheten i artiklarna 43 EG och 48 EG. Territorialitetsprincipen fördelar enbart upp beskattningsbehörigheten mellan medlemsstaterna och har enligt oss samma definition inom EG-rätten som den har i den internationella skatterätten. På grund av att territorialitetsprincipen i internationell skatterätt endast används för att definiera en stats beskattningsbehörighet anser vi att principen inte går att använda som stöd för att neka en gemenskapsmedborgare eller ett bolag en skatteförmån enbart med hänvisning till principen.


International law is composed by cooperation between sovereign states within different areas. Sovereign states have the power to legislate within their territories and because of this no other state can make binding laws on another state’s territory. This sovereign right to legislate is known as the principle of territoriality. Within international tax law the principle of territoriality means that a state has the right to taxation within its territory on all income related to that state. This means that those liable to full taxation are taxed on all their income regardless of where the income is earned and those liable to limited taxation are only taxed on income earned in that particular state.

When a sovereign state gives up parts of its sovereignty to the European Community (EC), which is a part of the international cooperation among states, the concept of territoriality is fragmentized since the exclusive legislative power that a state holds must be shared with the legislative power of the EC. The freedom of establishment in articles 43 EC and 48 EC must be respected by the Member States since they through the admission of the EC granted that they would not apply laws that restricted the right for community citizens and companies to establish themselves in other member states than their own. With the limitation of the state’s sovereignty the term of territoriality becomes vaguer and it can be ques-tioned if the principle of territoriality has a position within EC law. It is also interesting to examine whether the principle can be seen as a justification for national law that is in conflict with the freedom of establishment or not.

Even though there is some uncertainty whether the principle of territoriality can be seen as a valid justification or not the member states are still trying to invoke it. Since the European Court of Justice recognized the principle of territoriality in a case concerning the right to freedom of establishment it can not easily be dismissed.

We do not, however, consider the principle of territoriality to be an independent justification for laws that are in conflict with the freedom of establishment in articles 43 EC and 48 EC. We believe that the principle only attributes the right to taxation between the Member States and that the principle is defined as in international tax law. Because the principle is given this definition it can only be used to define a states ability to taxation. We believe that the principle can not be relied upon to deny a Community citizen or a company a right to a tax relief.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Aba'a, Megne Harry. "Lex loci protectionis et droit d'auteur." Thesis, Université Côte d'Azur, 2020. http://theses.univ-cotedazur.fr/2020COAZ0013.

Full text
Abstract:
Le principe de territorialité domine la matière de la propriété intellectuelle et en particulier celle du droit d’auteur. Si ce principe et la règle de conflit qu’il inspire, la lex loci protectionis, constituaient de véritables avancées à la fin du XIXème s., de nos jours, ils peinent à convaincre. En effet, le principe de territorialité qui est rattachable au principe de souveraineté dans sa dimension de régulation de l’ordre juridique interne subit de multiples remises en cause. Or, en raison de l’intensification des échanges transnationaux, de l’extension des marchés, de la montée des pouvoirs privés économiques, de l’exploitation dématérialisée des œuvres et notamment, la possibilité de les diffuser sur des réseaux mondiaux comme internet, la souveraineté tend à perdre en puissance. Cela oblige à questionner la pertinence d’un rattachement territorial vis-à-vis de réalités a-territoriales. Le maintien tel quel du principe de territorialité, en termes de conflit de lois, atteint alors la sécurité juridique et les attentes légitimes des parties. Le parti pris de ces travaux est celui d’une réévaluation. Il ressort en effet que le recul dans les relations transnationales du principe de souveraineté - qui sous-tend le principe de territorialité - devrait se traduire sur le plan de la règle de conflit, par un recul de ladite territorialité. A rebours de la tendance générale qui consacre l’hégémonie de la lex loci protectionis, les présents travaux proposent d’une part, d’en circonscrire la compétence dans les domaines où le principe de territorialité ne s’impose pas comme une nécessité, et d’autre part de réorienter le rattachement de manière à limiter la concurrence des lois applicables. Il s’agit, en d’autres termes, de réserver une place à l’universalisme compris comme un rempart contre la variabilité du droit applicable et l’insécurité juridique que cette variabilité pourrait emporter
The principle of territoriality dominates the field of intellectual property and that of copyright. If this principle and the conflict rule it inspires, the lex loci protectionis, were real advances at the end of the 19th century, they are nowadays difficult to convince. Indeed, the principle of territoriality, which is linked to the principle of sovereignty in its dimension of regulation of the internal legal order, is undergoing multiple challenges. However, because of the intensification of transnational exchanges, the extension of markets, the rise of private economic powers, the dematerialised exploitation of works and in particular the possibility of disseminating them on global networks such as the Internet, sovereignty tends to lose significance. This forces us to question the relevance of a territorial connection to a-territorial realities. Maintaining the principle of territoriality as it stands, in terms of conflict of laws, then reaches legal security and the legitimate expectations of the parties. The approach taken in this work is that of a re-evaluation. It emerges in fact that the retreat in transnational relations of the principle of sovereignty - which underlies the principle of territoriality - should be translated in terms of conflict rule by a retreat of the said territoriality. Against the general trend which confirms the hegemony of the lex loci protectionis, the present work proposes, on the one hand, to circumscribe its competence in the fields where the principle of territoriality is not imposed as a necessity, and on the other hand to reorient the connection in such a way as to limit the competition of the applicable laws. In other words, to reserve a place for universalism understood as a bulwark against the variability of the applicable law and the legal insecurity that this variability could entail
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Lang, Michael. "The Principle of Territoriality and its Implementation in the Proposal for a Council Directive on a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB)." WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, Universität Wien, 2012. http://epub.wu.ac.at/3769/1/2012_09_Lang_2012.pdf.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Robert, Eric. "Eléments d'une théorie de la frontière appliqués au droit fiscal." Thesis, Paris 2, 2011. http://www.theses.fr/2011PA020046/document.

Full text
Abstract:
Alors que sa disparition semble se profiler à l’horizon, du moins à l’intérieur de l’espace Européen, la notion juridique de frontière qui dessine les limites du territoire de l’Etat reste l’objet d’une imprécision surprenante. Aucune définition générale et intelligible ne semble encore lui avoir été consacrée, nonobstant la place centrale qui lui est attribuée par nombre d’analyses savantes sur les institutions de la modernité politique (Etat, souveraineté, territoire). Une tentative de définition (ou de théorisation) de la frontière est donc nécessaire. Théoriser la frontière n’implique pas de s’éloigner de la réalité : ce sont au contraire des données empiriques, sélectionnées à l’intérieur d’une foison d’informations disponibles sur le sujet, qui doivent guider un travail de systématisation. Au sein de celles-ci, la place privilégiée du droit fiscal (interne, communautaire et internationale) s’explique par les affinités personnelles de l’auteur. Ce dernier n’a toutefois pas omis de balayer d’autres disciplines, à l’instar du droit international public ou du droit international privé, aux fins de caractériser une substance irréductible et invariable de la frontière. Deux fonctions distinctes, bien que complémentaires, s’imposeront très rapidement comme les éléments constitutifs de la notion de frontière : la ligne réputée impénétrable en droit international qui sépare les territoires des Etats, d’un côté (ou « frontière internationale »), le filtre perméable qui régule les circulations entre les territoires des Etats (ou « frontière-obstacle »), de l’autre. Le temps et l’espace imposeront de limiter l’analyse au premier élément, à savoir la frontière internationale. À raison de ses fonctions pour commencer : quel est son rôle ? Mais aussi à raison de son objet : à quoi, ou à qui, s’applique-t-elle ? L’analyse des fonctions permettra d’abord de vérifier que la frontière internationale, en tant que cause et conséquence du principe de l’exclusivité territoriale, est étroitement liée à la notion d’Etat moderne. La naissance de la notion moderne de souveraineté, dans la mesure où elle est largement tributaire de la conquête du monopole de la violence légitime au profit des autorités centralisatrices de l’Etat, n’aurait pas été envisageable sans la constitution de frontières impénétrables aux limites du royaume. Plus largement, bien des notions fondamentales associées au droit étatique moderne (intégrité territoriale, centralisation de la contrainte, dualisme juridique,…) peuvent être reconsidérées à la lumière de la notion de frontière. L’analyse de l’objet de la frontière internationale permettra, ensuite, de surmonter bien des incertitudes. Celle qui touche, en particulier, au rapport entre la frontière impénétrable et le principe de territorialité des lois (ou des impôts) : la territorialité normative, sous toutes ses formes, ne peut-être assimilée à une manifestation (ou à une composante) de la frontière internationale. Celle qui touche, aussi, à la nature et à la portée de l’assistance administrative internationale entre les Etats dans le domaine fiscal. Le développement récent de celle-ci, sous toutes ses variantes (assiette et recouvrement), ne se traduit qu’exceptionnellement par des entorses à l’impénétrabilité des frontières. Toutes les activités de l’Etat n’ont pas, en effet, vocation à s’arrêter aux limites du territoire en application du droit international public. Seul l’imperium de l’Etat entendu stricto sensu, c’est-à-dire le pouvoir coercitif proprement dit, semble être soumis au respect de cette imperméabilité. En somme, à défaut de parvenir à dresser une théorie générale de la frontière en droit, certaines de ses caractéristiques majeures seront en l’espèce esquissées dans l’espoir de fournir au juriste une grille de lecture supplémentaire, et si possible originale, du droit positif
Even though its disappearance seems to be predictable, at least within the European Union, the legal notion of “Border” remains subject to a high degree of uncertainty. No general definition which combines clarity and precision, has been formulated on this matter yet. Therefore, time has come to provide a rigorous “definition” of this limit which separates the territories of the states. In other words, an attempt to theorize the notion of “Border” will be carried out in this book. The choice of a theoretical approach does not necessarily imply, however, to undertake a study remote from reality. To the contrary, an appropriate definition must be based on empirical data: selected matters among the huge amount of information available will be, as a result, the main source of this work. Among them, tax law (domestic, European and international) will play a key role due to the personal background of the author. The latter, however, did not forget to cover other disciplines. A wide-ranging scope is necessary where the objective is to reach the irreducible gist of a legal notion: International Public Law, Private International Law, Political Science as well as Sociology will be dealt with in this book. Two distinct functions (meanwhile complementary) will immediately be identified as the main components of the notion of “Border”: the dividing line, seen as impenetrable under International Public Law, that separates the territories of the States on one hand (so-called "international border"), and the permeable filter which regulates by way of discriminatory rules the movements (e.g. goods, persons, rights, values) between the states on the other hand (so-called “obstacle-border"). Due to limited time and space, however, this book will only focus on the first component, namely the international border. A study of its functions (i.e. what is the purpose for the impenetrability of the border?), will be followed by a study of its object (what is the scope of the impenetrability of the border?). The study of the functions will demonstrate that the international border, as a cause and a consequence of the principle of territorial exclusivity (i.e. monopoly of violence within the territorial borders), has strong ties with the concept of “Modern State”. Moreover, many fundamental notions generally attached to modern statute law (e.g. coercion, sovereignty, legal dualism) will be reconsidered in the light of this principle of impenetrability. Further, the analysis of the object of the international border will enable the author to eliminate certain jeopardizing uncertainties. Among others, the issue concerning the existence (or not) of a kinship between the “Border” and the territoriality of the law (including Power to Tax) will eventually be resolved: the territoriality principle, irrespective of its forms, is not an appearance (neither a component) of the international border. All activities undertaken by a state (i.e. legislative and executive powers), therefore, are not forced by law to be circumscribed to the territorial limits of that state. Only the core of the Imperium of a Modern State, that is to say the coercive power itself, seems to be subject to the impenetrability of the Border. In short, this book does not provide for (and is not aimed at) a general and all-comprehensive theory on “Borders”. Some of the major features of the latter are, however, clearly characterized herewith in order to provide the reader with another tool to scrutinize positive law
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Fischerová, Alena. "Ochranná známka v kontextu evropského a amerického práva." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2010. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-85951.

Full text
Abstract:
The diploma thesis deals with trademark protection in the system of Community and US law by using the scientific comparative method. The Community trademark is used as the comparatum and the federal trademark as the comparandum. The main goal of the thesis is the comparison of the EU and US perspective on the trademark as one of the subjects of industrial rights. To reach the set goal, the key aspects of the trademark protection are fully discussed in compared legal systems. The first part of the thesis represents the theoretical introduction into the field of trademarks. Here, the historical development is summarized, the evolvement of the single community protection together with principles of trademark protection in the USA are explained, completed by a summary of the sources of law in compared legal systems. In the main part of the thesis, the trademark in both legal systems is discussed, starting with the trademark definition according to both the Community and US law together with the key international treaties; followed by an explanation of different trademark types with an emphasis on non-traditional trademarks; right to trademark; Community and US trademark registration compared to the international registration; trademark use; and concluding with the rights the trademark holder possesses.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Lundstedt, Lydia. "Territoriality in Intellectual Property Law : A comparative study of the interpretation and operation of the territoriality principle in the resolution of transborder intellectual property infringement disputes with respect to international civil jurisdiction, applicable law and the territorial scope of application of substantive intellectual property law in the European Union and United States." Doctoral thesis, Stockholms universitet, Juridiska institutionen, 2016. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-133470.

Full text
Abstract:
The principle of territoriality is a truism in intellectual property (IP) law. A premise underlying the principle is the right of each state to determine the extent to which IP rights exist and are protected within its own territory to fulfil its own economic, social and cultural policy goals. This is done by giving a right to prevent others from doing within the protected territory any of the acts that are exclusively reserved to the right holder under the IP statute that granted or protects the IP right. The principle of territoriality informs that IP rights granted or protected by a state are independent from those granted or protected by other states, and that the rights conferred under each state’s IP law are limited to the territory of that state. As the principle of territoriality neatly allocated jurisdiction among states on a territorial basis, it purportedly obviated the need for private international law. Each state exercised jurisdiction over the infringement of its own rights and applied its own domestic IP law, which served the interests of the states and of the parties. With the increase in the protection and exploitation of IP rights across national borders, infringements do not remain within hermetically sealed national territories. Acts taken in one state can have effects in other states and impair the policies that the rights were designed to fulfil. This raises questions concerning the territorial scope of application of the domestic IP law, that is, whether it is interpreted with respect to a domestic tangible act, effects on a domestic policy goal or both. In addition, the transborder exploitation of IP rights raises questions of private international law with respect to whether states exercise jurisdiction and apply national law to disputes concerning infringements of their domestic rights or whether states exercise jurisdiction and apply national law to disputes arising from acts committed in their territories (or both). These determinations may depend on different factors such as the different interests taken into consideration (e.g. state or party interests), the different legal traditions upon which the legal systems are based and the characteristics and functions of the IP rights themselves. This dissertation compares the interpretation and operation of the principle of territoriality of IP law in the private law resolution of transborder IP infringement disputes in the legal systems of the European Union and the United States, two distinctly different legal systems that have significant trade and investment relations with each other. The comparison shows that while the systems are functionally similar, the principle of territoriality is interpreted and operates somewhat differently in the two legal systems.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Joly, Marine. "La matérialité de l'infraction à l'épreuve des extensions du principe de territorialité." Thesis, Paris 2, 2014. http://www.theses.fr/2014PA020088/document.

Full text
Abstract:
Avec le développement de la criminalité et de la délinquance internationale, de nombreuses infractions se réalisent partiellement ou totalement hors du territoire de la République. Afin de soumettre ces infractions comportant un élément d’extranéité au droit pénal français, le législateur et les juridictions internes tentent de ramener ces dernières sur le territoire de la République en établissant un lien entre le territoire national et l’infraction transnationale. A défaut pour le territoire d’être modifié, l’infraction est manipulée. Par conséquent, les règles de sa consommation vont se trouver altérées pour les besoins de sa localisation. La présente étude conduit à dégager une progression dans l’artifice qui consiste à retenir un critère de rattachement, soit appartenant à l’élément matériel de l’infraction mais ne pouvant pas être pris en compte, soit n’appartenant pas à l’élément matériel de l’infraction, et donc ne devant pas être pris en compte
With the constant increase of international felony and criminality, more and more offences take place partially or totally out of France. In order to submit theses offences with a foreign element to the French criminal law, the national lawmaker and criminal courts are trying to repatriate these breaches within the French territory by trying to establish a link between France and the offence incorporating the foreign element. Since the National boundaries cannot be modified therefore the offence is legally modified. Consequently, the rules regarding the accomplishment of the offence will be modified in order to establish its location. The present Thesis leads to enhance an artificial progression which consists in retaining a connection for the offence, either pertaining to the material element of the offence but which cannot be taken into account or, either not pertaining to the material element of the offence which should not be taken into account
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Bouche, Nicolas. "Le principe de territorialité de la propriété intellectuelle." Dijon, 1999. http://www.theses.fr/1999DIJOD010.

Full text
Abstract:
Le principe de territorialité est, depuis longtemps, une notion-clé de la propriété intellectuelle, tant dans le droit français que dans les droits étrangers. C’est également une notion dont l’ambiguïté est cependant restée immense, qu’il s’agisse de son sens, de son fondement ou de ses conséquences. C’est dont l’objet de cette thèse que de cerner cet « illustre inconnu » et ce, à travers ses deux acceptions les plus importantes : le « principe de territorialité de conflit de lois » selon lequel le droit international de la propriété intellectuelle est régi par le droit du pays pour le territoire duquel sont revendiqués l’existence et l’effet d’un droit subjectif de propriété intellectuelle
The principle of territoriality, for a long time, a key-word of the intellectual property in French law as in the foreign laws. However, it is also o nation whose ambiguity is still huge regarding its meaning, its ground or its consequences. It is therefore the object of this thesis to understand this principle through two of its most important meanings l the “principle of territoriality of limitation” according to which a right exists and is effective only on the territory covered by the legal order which has crated it, and the “principle of territoriality of conflit of laws” according to which the international private law of the intellectual property is governed by the law of the country for which territory the existence and the effect of a right of intellectual property are claimed
Das Territorialitäsprinzig ist seit langer Zeit ein Schlüsselbegriff für das Recht des geistigen Eigentums, im französischen Recht ebenso wie in den ausländischen Rechtsordnungen. Sein Inhalt, seine Begründung oder seine Wirkungen sind jedoch immer vieldeutig geblieben. Es ist also Gengenstand dieser Dissertation, dieses schwierig zu fassende Prinzip über seine zwei wichtigsten Ausprägungen näher zu untersuche : das “Territorialitätsprinzig der Beschränkung”, nach dem ein subjektives Recht raümlich nur innerhalb dem Territorium dur Rechtsordnung besteht und wirkt, die dieses subjektive Recht geschaffen hat, und das “Territorialitätsprinzig des Kollisionsrechts”, welches besagt daB das Recht jeweils desjenigen Landes anzuwenden ist, für dessen Gebiet die Existenz und di Wirkung eines subjektiven Immaterialgüterrechts in Anspruch genommen sind
Le principe de territorialité est, depuis longtemps, une notion-clé de la propriété intellectuelle, tant dans le droit français que dans les droits étrangers. C’est également une notion dont l'ambiguïté est cependant restée immense, qu'il s'agisse de son sens, de son fondement ou de ses conséquences. C'est donc l'objet de cette thèse que de cerner cet "illustre inconnu" et ce, à travers ses deux acceptions les plus importantes : le "principe de territorialité de limitation" selon lequel un droit subjectif n'a d'existence et d'effet géographiquement que sur le territoire couvert par l'ordre juridique qui l'a créé, et le "principe de territorialité de conflit de lois" selon lequel le droit international de la propriété intellectuelle est régi par le droit du pays pour le territoire duquel sont revendiqués l'existence et l'effet d'un droit subjectif de propriété intellectuelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Neto, Ayrton Ruy Giublin. "O espaço na norma jurídica tributária: territorialidade, critério espacial e elementos de conexão." Universidade de São Paulo, 2014. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2133/tde-11022015-161438/.

Full text
Abstract:
O objeto da pesquisa é o critério espacial da regra-matriz de incidência tributária. A pesquisa tem início nos enunciados do texto constitucional para avaliar se existem critérios espaciais constitucionais. Avançando no ciclo de positivação da norma jurídica, o estudo analisa o papel da lei complementar na função de dispor sobre conflitos de competência e suas possíveis relações com a determinação do critério espacial. Por fim, o estudo analisa o critério espacial na estrutura normativa da regra-matriz de incidência tributária.
The object of the research is the spatial criterion of matrix rule of tax incidence. The research starts in the text of Constitution to examine whether there are constitucional spatial criteria. Advancing in the positivization cycle of the legal norm, the study examines the role of complementary law in the function of dispose about conflicts of jurisdiction and possible relationships with determining the spatial criterion. Finally, the study analyzes the spatial criterion in the structure of the matrix rule of tax incidence.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Territoriality principle"

1

Frédéric, Pollaud-Dulian, ed. Le principe de territorialité de la propriété intellectuelle. Paris: L'Harmattan, 2002.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Monsenego, Jérôme. Taxation of foreign business income within the European internal market: An analysis of the conflict between the objective of achievement of the European internal market and the principles of territoriality and worldwide taxation. Amsterdam: IBFD, 2012.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Svantesson, Dan Jerker B. The Tyranny of Territoriality. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198795674.003.0002.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter provides an in-depth analysis of the sources most commonly cited concerning the reason why the current paradigm is so focused on territoriality. In particular, attention is given to the Lotus case and the Harvard Draft—the two sources often relied upon without proper analysis. In addition, a broader analysis is provided highlighting that: (1) the territoriality principle cannot alone be the jurisprudential core of jurisdiction; (2) a strict application of territoriality is destructive; (3) State practice has already moved beyond territoriality, territorial sovereignty, and the Harvard Draft principles; (4) the imprecise, and conceptually flawed, concept of extraterritorial jurisdiction undermines territoriality as a concept; (5) territoriality is a component of a dysfunctional system; and (6) the flaws associated with territoriality also impact the offline world of jurisdiction.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

FitzGerald, David Scott. Refuge beyond Reach. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190874155.001.0001.

Full text
Abstract:
The core of the asylum regime is the principle of non-refoulement that prohibits governments from sending refugees back to their persecutors. Governments attempt to evade this legal obligation to which they have explicitly agreed by manipulating territoriality. A remote control strategy of “extraterritorialization” pushes border control functions hundreds or even thousands of kilometers beyond the state’s territory. Simultaneously, states restrict access to asylum and other rights enjoyed by virtue of presence on a state’s territory, by making micro-distinctions down to the meter at the borderline in a process of “hyper-territorialization.” This study analyzes remote controls since the 1930s in Palestine, North America, Europe, and Australia to identify the origins of different forms of remote control, explain how they work together as a system of control, and establish the conditions that enable or constrain them in practice. It argues that foreign policy issue linkages and transnational advocacy networks promoting a humanitarian norm that is less susceptible to the legal manipulation of territoriality constrains remote controls more than the law itself. The degree of constraint varies widely by the technique of remote control.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Gamberini, Andrea. The Political Cultures of the City and the Territory. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198824312.003.0005.

Full text
Abstract:
The projection of the city commune beyond the walls raised the issue of confrontation not only with imperial political culture, but also with that of the territorial bodies. The civitates initiated a dialogue with the latter which initially valorized those elements in common above all—those, in other words, on which it was possible to build agreements. These ranged from the allodiality of power to the culture of possession, to feudalism, etc.—elements consistent with a policy of expansion that in these initial stages generally took place peacefully. One case apart was the political culture of territoriality, which jurists from a later age summed up with the formula iurisdictio cohaeret territorio: not unknown to the society of the countryside, it acquired increasing importance only when the civil courts, called upon to resolve jurisdictional litigation between lords, elected it as the ordering principle of the power struggles in the countryside.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Svantesson, Dan Jerker B. Solving the Internet Jurisdiction Puzzle. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198795674.001.0001.

Full text
Abstract:
Internet jurisdiction has emerged as one of the greatest and most urgent challenges online, severely affecting areas as diverse as e-commerce, data privacy, law enforcement, content take-downs, cloud computing, e-health, Cyber security, intellectual property, freedom of speech, and Cyberwar. In this innovative book, Professor Svantesson presents a vision for a new approach to Internet jurisdiction––for both private international law and public international law––based on sixteen years of research dedicated specifically to the topic. The book demonstrates that our current paradigm remains attached to a territorial thinking that is out of sync with our modern world, especially, but not only, online. Having made the claim that our adherence to the territoriality principle is based more on habit than on any clear and universally accepted legal principles, Professor Svantesson advances a new jurisprudential framework for how we approach jurisdiction. He also proposes several other reform initiatives such as the concept of ‘investigative jurisdiction’ and an approach to geo-blocking, aimed at equipping us to solve the Internet jurisdiction puzzle. In addition, the book provides a history of Internet jurisdiction, and challenges our traditional categorisation of different types of jurisdiction. It places Internet jurisdiction in a broader context and outlines methods for how properly to understand and work with rules of Internet jurisdiction. While Solving the Internet Puzzle paints a clear picture of the concerns involved and the problems that needs to be overcome, this book is distinctly aimed at finding practical solutions anchored in a solid theoretical framework.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Steffek, Jens. International Organization as Technocratic Utopia. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192845573.001.0001.

Full text
Abstract:
As climate change and a pandemic pose enormous challenges to humankind, the concept of expert governance gains new traction. This book revisits the idea that scientists, bureaucrats, and lawyers, rather than politicians or diplomats, should manage international relations. It shows that this technocratic approach has been a persistent theme in writings about international relations, both academic and policy-oriented, since the 19th century. The technocratic tradition of international thought unfolded in four phases which were closely related to domestic processes of modernization and rationalization. The pioneering phase lasted from the Congress of Vienna to the First World War. In these years, philosophers, law scholars, and early social scientists began to combine internationalism and ideals of expert governance. Between the two world wars, a utopian period followed that was marked by visions of technocratic international organizations that would have overcome the principle of territoriality. In the third phase, from the 1940s to the 1960s, technocracy became the dominant paradigm of international institution-building. That paradigm began to disintegrate from the 1970s onwards, but important elements remain until the present day. The specific promise of technocratic internationalism is its ability to transform violent and unpredictable international politics into orderly and competent public administration. Such ideas also had political clout. This book shows how they left their mark on the League of Nations, the functional branches of the United Nations system, and the European integration project.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Zürn, Michael. Normative Principles. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198819974.003.0002.

Full text
Abstract:
The global governance system rests on three normative principles, each of which qualifies the Westphalian principle of sovereignty. The first questions the implicit notion that all political communities are territorially segmented by highlighting the notion of common goods that need to be achieved together. The second questions the idea that political authorities are absolute by noting the rights of individuals and entitlements of non-state actors that they have independent of being members of a state. The third principle questions the notion that there are no authorities other than the state by mooting the possibility of international authority. This chapter discusses these normative principles and their “empirical appropriateness.” In using the method of rational reconstruction, it is shown that the assumptions of a global governance system seem to be better suited to understand world politics in the twenty-first century than the notion of an anarchic international system or an international society.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Vandenhole, Wouter. Challenging Territoriality in Human Rights Law: Foundational Principles for a Multi Duty-Bearer Human Rights Regime. Taylor & Francis Group, 2015.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Ando, Clifford. Legal Pluralism in Practice. Edited by Paul J. du Plessis, Clifford Ando, and Kaius Tuori. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198728689.013.22.

Full text
Abstract:
The Roman Empire systematically recognised alien polities in provincial landscapes and allowed them local powers of jurisdiction and legislation. It also created conditions of heightened human mobility and regularly endowed aliens with Roman citizenship. This chapter explores the procedural and theoretical resources developed by Roman authorities to deal with the conflicts of law that resulted from these processes. It explores principles governing choice of law, to wit, those of personality and territoriality. It also investigates procedural mechanisms that temporarily bracketed distinctions that rendered actions non-justiciable, for example, the legal fiction that assimilated aliens to citizens for the purposes of dispute resolution.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Territoriality principle"

1

Wunn, Ina, and Davina Grojnowski. "Heroes, Gods, Sanctuaries—The Male Principle and Collective Cult." In Ancestors, Territoriality, and Gods, 197–218. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-52757-3_11.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Saluzzo, Stefano. "The Principle of Territoriality in EU Data Protection Law." In Borders, Legal Spaces and Territories in Contemporary International Law, 121–41. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20929-2_5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Dioh, Adrien. "Access to Social Protection by Immigrants, Emigrants and Resident Nationals in Senegal." In IMISCOE Research Series, 277–87. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51237-8_16.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThe Senegalese social protection system has been designed and implemented for the exclusive benefit of workers and their families to protect them against economic and social risks which may cause a (partial or total, temporary or permanent) loss of their earning capacity or the capacity to satisfy their basic needs. The system, which is essentially financed by the contributions of workers and employers, does not include the larger part of the population which evolves in the informal sector. The relevant regulations introduced a principle of equal opportunity for all benefits offered to Senegalese and migrant workers as well as their family members. Nationality is therefore irrelevant since wage-earning remains a fundamental criterion. Nevertheless, because of the territoriality of social security laws, the various benefits provided by the system are not applicable. The system only benefits Senegalese and foreign workers residing in the national territory. Not only is it disadvantageous to nationals living abroad, but it can also hinder the return of foreign workers to their countries of origin at the end of their professional career. The situation can be improved by bilateral or multilateral social security agreements binding the different countries.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Vintila, Daniela, and Jean-Michel Lafleur. "Migration and Access to Welfare Benefits in the EU: The Interplay between Residence and Nationality." In IMISCOE Research Series, 1–32. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51241-5_1.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract Increasing mobility to and from European Union (EU) countries has started to challenge the principles of territoriality and national citizenship through which European democracies traditionally conditioned access to social benefits. Existing typologies of immigrant social protection regimes do not seem to adequately capture (nor explain) the diverse repertoire of policy configurations through which European welfare regimes adapt to migration-driven societal dynamics. This introductory chapter provides a critical reflection on the link between migration and access to welfare in the EU. In doing so, it aims to propose a comprehensive analytical framework that allows for a systematic comparison of the inclusiveness of social protection systems towards mobile individuals. We argue that states’ responsiveness towards the social protection needs of their immigrant and emigrant populations has to be examined through a combination of factors, including the characteristics of these populations, the migration history of these countries, as well as the main features of their welfare state.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Ryngaert, Cedric. "The Territoriality Principle." In Jurisdiction in International Law, 42–84. Oxford University Press, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199544714.003.0003.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Blattner, Charlotte E. "The Unexplored: Direct Extraterritoriality." In Protecting Animals Within and Across Borders, 161–98. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190948313.003.0006.

Full text
Abstract:
Chapter 5 examines whether the jurisdictional principles of international law can be used to directly protect animals abroad under the lex lata. It determines how and when states can invoke the territoriality principle, the subjective and objective territoriality principles, the personality principle, and the protective principle in the realm of animal law. By using the subjective and objective territoriality principles, states can regulate continuing offenses (e.g., improper transport or cross-border theft), cross-border crimes committed in different countries, and cross-border duties of care owed to animals. The active personality principle gives states jurisdiction over their nationals or residents when they deal with animals abroad. They can further extend their jurisdiction to multinationals operating worldwide by relying on established doctrines of company law, like piercing the corporate veil or the control theory. The author then shows how the protective principle enables states to protect animals abroad by regulating foreign agricultural industries that significantly pollute the environment.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Rutherglen, George. "Territoriality and Its Troubles." In The Restatement and Beyond, 371–88. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197533154.003.0018.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter examines what the presumption against extraterritoriality means and how it operates. The presumption against extraterritoriality itself presumes a set of complicated rules about which features of a transnational case count: which features make a case territorial and within the scope of a federal statute because these features can be located within the United States or, if they cannot, make the case extraterritorial and outside the statute’s scope. The dependence of the presumption upon a network of other rules both complicates its operation and makes it a less than certain guide to statutory interpretation. The chapter then considers the justification for territorial allocation of government power generally, and addresses the question of whether any presumption about the territorial scope of statutes must await a new consensus on the appropriate rules of choice of law. It argues that the presumption against extraterritoriality requires a flexible interpretation that makes it more of a principle than a rule. From that premise, the chapter studies the choice between an ad hoc and a principled application of the presumption, both of which are exemplified in recent decisions.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Hörnle, Julia. "Jurisdiction of the Criminal Courts in Cybercrime Cases in Germany and England." In Internet Jurisdiction Law and Practice, 115–44. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198806929.003.0005.

Full text
Abstract:
Chapter 5 deals with the jurisdiction of the criminal courts and the applicable criminal law (the ambit of the criminal law) and contrasts the English common law with German law in cybercrime cases, highlighting the similarity of the challenges and the differences in approach of both countries. As a broad rule of thumb, English common law (largely) restricts criminal jurisdiction to the territoriality principle, whereas German law recognizes the active and the passive personality principle, sometimes coupled with the double criminality rule, meaning that the act must be a criminal offence in the place where it was carried out. Notably, German law has codified the universality principle for certain offences, and by so doing exceeds its obligations under international treaties; for example, in respect of child sexual exploitation and abuse materials. Both countries face the same challenges in applying the territoriality principle and connecting cybercrime offences to their respective territories (eg in respect of the question where illegal content online was published). Criminal jurisdiction (subject to specific statutory exceptions) in England has long been confined by the terminatory approach, but has now been reformed by a substantial measure test. Finally, the chapter examines inchoate offences and the specific provisions on jurisdiction contained in the Computer Misuse Act.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Hörnle, Julia. "Intellectual Property—Internet Jurisdiction and Applicable Law." In Internet Jurisdiction Law and Practice, 406–35. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198806929.003.0012.

Full text
Abstract:
Chapter 12 covers jurisdiction and applicable law in respect of internet cases involving intellectual property (IP). It covers both registered rights (eg trademarks, patents, design rights) and unregistered rights (eg passing off, copyright). It incisively discusses the relationship between IP and the territoriality principle, and how the English courts have moved away from the strict territoriality rule in recent years. The chapter discusses the Berne Convention and, within the EU, the Copyright Directive overcoming the strict territoriality of copyright. It includes a discussion of domain names and in rem jurisdiction at the place of registration of the domain name. The chapter then moves to an explanation of the jurisdictional rules in England, as well as the harmonized EU rules in the Brussels Regulation. The chapter analyses in rem, subject-matter jurisdiction and its interplay with personal jurisdiction under the Brussels Regulation and the English Jurisdiction rules. The chapter briefly discusses the jurisdictional provisions in the EU Trademark Regulation, Community Design Regulation, and the European Patent. Finally, it covers the rules on applicable law in the Rome II Regulation and the Berne Convention.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Henriksen, Anders. "5. Jurisdiction." In International Law. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198753018.003.0005.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter discusses the international legal concept of jurisdiction as well as the content of the relevant legal principles. The term jurisdiction relates to the authority of a state to exert its influence and power — in practice make, apply, and enforce its rules — and create an impact or consequence on individuals or property. The chapter explains the difference between, respectively, the jurisdiction to prescribe and the jurisdiction to enforce and the main elements thereof. It analyses the different principles of prescriptive jurisdiction (the principle of territoriality, nationality, universality, protection, and so-called passive personality) and discusses the issue of concurring jurisdictions as well as jurisdiction on ships and aircraft. It also discusses the prohibition on enforcing jurisdiction on the territory of another state as well as the legal consequences of violating that prohibition.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Territoriality principle' for particular source types:
Journal articles Dissertations / Theses
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography