Academic literature on the topic 'Testicular self examination'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Testicular self examination.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Testicular self examination"
&NA;. "TESTICULAR SELF-EXAMINATION." American Journal of Nursing 99, no. 7 (July 1999): 49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000446-199907000-00036.
Full textTugwell, Moray. "Testicular self-examination." Primary Health Care 6, no. 5 (May 1988): 18–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.7748/phc.6.5.18.s13.
Full textSANDEMAN, T. F. "Testicular self-examination." Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 24, no. 1 (February 1988): 3–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1754.1988.tb01323.x.
Full textRudberg, Lennart, Sten Nilsson, Karin Wikblad, and Marianne Carlsson. "Testicular Cancer and Testicular Self-examination." Cancer Nursing 28, no. 4 (July 2005): 256???262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00002820-200507000-00003.
Full textFadich, Ana, Salvatore J. Giorgianni, Michael J. Rovito, Gregory A. Pecchia, Jean J. Bonhomme, Wesley B. Adams, Colin L. Stephenson, Felipe E. Mesa-Morales, and Justin Scott Sparkes. "USPSTF Testicular Examination Nomination–Self-Examinations and Examinations in a Clinical Setting." American Journal of Men's Health 12, no. 5 (May 2, 2018): 1510–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1557988318768597.
Full textCook, Neal. "Testicular cancer: testicular self-examination and screening." British Journal of Nursing 9, no. 6 (March 2000): 338–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2000.9.6.6337.
Full textAnderson, John, and Thomas Francis. "Testicular Cancer and Self-Examination." InnovAiT: Education and inspiration for general practice 6, no. 2 (February 2013): 93–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/innovait_ins101.
Full textPeate, Ian. "Testicular cancer and self examination." Practice Nursing 9, no. 9 (May 19, 1998): 28–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/pnur.1998.9.9.28.
Full textKaya, Eymen. "Testicular cancer and self-examination." InnovAiT: Education and inspiration for general practice 9, no. 11 (September 26, 2016): 663–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1755738016666570.
Full textMistry, Rahul. "Tips on - Testicular self examination." BMJ 331, Suppl S6 (December 1, 2005): 0512462a. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sbmj.0512462a.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Testicular self examination"
Pee, Barbel Christel Giesela. "Health promotion : social cognitions and testicular self examination." Thesis, University of Surrey, 1997. http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/844306/.
Full textSoler, Lisa. "The effect of text messaging alerts upon testicular self-examination (tse) adherence." Honors in the Major Thesis, University of Central Florida, 2012. http://digital.library.ucf.edu/cdm/ref/collection/ETH/id/625.
Full textB.S.
Bachelors
Health and Public Affairs
Health Professions
Rovito, Michael Joseph. "Developing a Health-Based "Control Identity" Typology: A Testicular Self-Examination Application." Diss., Temple University Libraries, 2009. http://cdm16002.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p245801coll10/id/61543.
Full textPh.D.
The primary aim of this research was the development of a typology of respondents based on their "control identity"– i.e., perceived sense of control over themselves, their environment, and aspects of their health, including perceived vulnerability to disease and perceived value of health promotion. Testicular cancer and testicular self examination (TSE) were selected as the disease focus, with the realization that, if successful, the typology could be applied across a variety of diseases. The constructs of "realistic vs. unrealistic control" and "internal vs. external locus of control" provided the theoretical foundation to initially define the control-identity types that were then verified through cluster/segmentation analyses. Testicular cancer rates are rising among 15-54 year old men with the majority of those cases affecting males under the age of 35. Regular screening techniques for the disease, most notably testicular self-examination, are rarely performed among surveyed males. If testicular cancer is caught in its early stages, the survival rate is approximately 95%; however, if diagnosed in later stages, survival rates drop below 50%. The lack of published psychosocial behavioral research in this area has contributed to a general misunderstanding by men of the disease and its preventative/screening measures. If continued, this lack of screening for testicular cancer can only lead to increasing incidence and mortality rates. This exploratory study developed a Control Identity Survey, a 41-item questionnaire soliciting information on perceived vulnerability, value of health promotion, health control beliefs, and intention to perform testicular self-examination (TSE). The survey was administered via in-person and internet data collection methods to 300 men between the ages of 18-35. A principal components factor analysis of the survey’s key control variables (realistic vs. unrealistic illusory control constructs and internal v. external locus of control) defined the underlying structure of the data. The resulting factors were then used to create indices for use in the cluster analysis process. From this cluster analysis, control-identity groups were identified and profiled. Given the control-identity types, perceptual mapping techniques were then applied to model how each type of respondent perceives their vulnerability to testicular cancer, the value of testicular self-examination, and overall health control beliefs. This study equated perceptions with an individuals’ ‘outcome expectancy’, or attitude. The findings confirmed the following: •The hypothesized four-group control-identity typology was verified among men based on the variables of health control beliefs, perceived vulnerability, and perceived value of health promotion. The groups were labeled: 1) Realistic Externals, 2) Realistic Internals, 3) Unrealistic Internals, 4) Unrealistic Externals. •Unrealistic Externals perceive the value of TSE to be significantly lower than other types. •Unrealistic Externals perceived their control over health outcomes to be lower than all other types. •Each control-identity type structures perceptions of health control beliefs, vulnerability, and the value of health promotion similarly in a 3-dimensional perceptual mapping space, but the location of “self” within the concept set differs by control-identity type. •Realistic Internals scored the highest among types on value of health promotion, but not significantly so compared to the other groups, with the exception of the Unrealistic Externals, who least value health promotion. •The two “Realistic” types (Internal & External) scored significantly higher on perceived Vulnerability than did the two "Unrealistic" types (Internal & External), with the "Internals" v. "Externals" not differing significantly. •Unrealistic Internals scored highest on perceived self-efficacy (I-Control), but not significantly higher than Realistic Internals, which appears consistent with the fact that "internals" have a higher sense of health-related self-efficacy than do "externals". •Implications for social marketing and for the development of future behavioral intervention strategies are suggested. The methods used in this research could have wide application across the cancer continuum from primary prevention and screening to treatment and end-of-life decisions. From this research, it is clear that men differ significantly in their “control identity”-- the extent to which they perceive themselves as having an internal v. external and/or realistic vs. unrealistic sense of control over their health. Consistently, the control-types differed on perceptions of their own vulnerability to disease, their perceived value of health promotion, and their individual health control beliefs. The resulting typology appears to have exceptional potential for future research across a variety of health related behaviors and diseases. As well, the typology holds promise as a cost-effective way to tailor evidence-based decision aids for each of the control-identities. Since there is little reported success in promoting sustainable TSE among males, it is suggested that building on the control-identity approach will aid testicular cancer and TSE researchers in developing more effective, tailored messages for their study designs.
Temple University--Theses
Slider, Cara L. "Encouraging testicular self-examination behaviors in college males examining the role of fear appeals in protection motivation theory /." Morgantown, W. Va. : [West Virginia University Libraries], 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/10450/10148.
Full textTitle from document title page. Document formatted into pages; contains iii, 76 p. : ill. Includes abstract. Includes bibliographical references (p. 40-43).
List, Penelope Anne Denman. "Individual differences associated with adults' self-examination for breast cancer and testicular cancer." Thesis, Keele University, 2008. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.558321.
Full textMcGilligan, Caroline M. "Testicular self-examination behaviour, the development and longitudinal evaluation of a theory-based intervention utilizing the theory of planned behaviour : A clustered randomized control trial." Thesis, University of Ulster, 2010. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.531028.
Full textLodyga, Marc. "The Relationship Between Health Belief Model Constructs and Factors Influencing Cancer Self-Examinations in College Students." OpenSIUC, 2013. https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/dissertations/767.
Full textAnderson, Linda L. "Behavioral self-management issues of college age young adult men related to testicular self-examination a research proposal submitted in partial fulfillment ... /." 1988. http://catalog.hathitrust.org/api/volumes/oclc/68788068.html.
Full textSalgueira, Sofia Gomes. "Perceptions of testicular cancer among Portuguese university students." Master's thesis, 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/10316/98511.
Full textIntrodução: O cancro do testículo (CT) corresponde ao tumor sólido mais frequente em homens entre os 18-35 anos de idade e tem uma sobrevivência global aos 5 anos de 99% na doença localizada. Existe uma perceção geral de que subsiste uma falta de conhecimento significativa sobre a doença dentro desta população. Assim, este estudo tem como objetivo determinar o conhecimento da população universitária Portuguesa sobre o CT.Métodos: Neste estudo transversal, 871 estudantes universitários responderam a um questionário online relativamente às suas perceções sobre o CT. Foram questionados sobre a faixa etária com maior risco para CT e sobre a deteção, o prognóstico e o impacto da doença na qualidade de vida dos doentes, bem como sinais e sintomas comuns da doença. Os participantes do sexo masculino foram questionados sobre sua prática de autoexame testicular. Por fim, foram questionados sobre suas motivações para aprender mais sobre o assunto e o método de comunicação preferido.Resultados: 89,2% (n = 777) dos alunos já ouviram falar em CT, mas apenas 31,8% sabiam a faixa etária de risco. Os alunos foram capazes de reconhecer um nódulo testicular palpável como um sinal comum (90,2%) de CT, mas o score calculado de conhecimento geral sobre a doença foi baixo. A prática do autoexame testicular é reduzida, com apenas 53 homens (n = 275) realizando o autoexame mensalmente. A grande maioria (90,9%) demonstrou interesse em saber mais sobre o diagnóstico precoce de CT e sobre o autoexame testicular. Profissionais / serviços de saúde (73,8%) e Internet / Redes sociais (69%) foram as fontes preferenciais de informação mais relatadas.Conclusão: Concluímos que os jovens do sexo masculino possuem pouco conhecimento sobre CT, e a maioria ainda não pratica o autoexame testicular mensalmente. Futuras campanhas de consciencialização e intervenções educacionais são necessárias para aumentar a compreensão sobre a doença.
Background: Testicular cancer (TC) is the most frequent tumor in males between 18-35 years old and has a 5-year survival rate of 99% in localized disease. Within this populations there is a general perception there is significant lack of knowledge about this disease. Thus, this study aims to determine the knowledge about TC amongst Portuguese university students.Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 871 university students answered an online questionnaire on their perceptions about TC. They were inquired about the age-risk group for TC and detection, prognosis and impact of the disease on patients' quality of life, as well as common signs and symptoms. Male participants were also asked about their testicular self-exam (TSE) practice. Lastly, they were questioned about their motivations to learn more about the subject and preferred method of communication.Results: 89,2% (n=777) of students had heard of TC, but only 31,8% knew the age-risk group. Students were able to recognize a palpable testicular nodule as a common (90,2%) sign of TC, but the general knowledge score was still low. TSE practice was also low, with only 53 males (n=275) performing TSE monthly. The vast majority (90,9%) were interested in learning more about TSE and TC early diagnosis. Health professionals/facilities (73,8%) and Internet/Social media (69%) were the most reported preferable sources of information.Conclusion: We conclude that young males have poor knowledge about TC, and most still do not practice TSE monthly. Future awareness campaigns and educational interventions are needed to increase consciousness about the disease.
Del, Pino Marlene. "Development and pilot testing of a questionnaire examining men's beliefs regarding testicular self-examination utilizing the Theory of Reasoned Action." 1992. http://hdl.handle.net/1993/17985.
Full textBooks on the topic "Testicular self examination"
Testicular self-examination. [Bethesda, MD]: U.S. Dept. of Health, and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, 1985.
Find full textNational Cancer Institute (U.S.), ed. Testicular self-examination. [Bethesda, MD]: U.S. Dept. of Health, and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, 1985.
Find full textNational Cancer Institute (U.S.), ed. Testicular self-examination. [Bethesda, MD]: U.S. Dept. of Health, and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, 1986.
Find full textTesticular self-examination. [Bethesda, MD]: U.S. Dept. of Health, and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, 1985.
Find full textNational Cancer Institute (U.S.), ed. Testicular self-examination. [Bethesda, MD]: U.S. Dept. of Health, and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, 1985.
Find full textWatt, Simon. Evaluating a health education intervention promoting testicular self-examination in adolescent men. 1996.
Find full textO'Connell, Linda Gale. THE INFLUENCE OF KNOWLEDGE, SELF-CONCEPT, AND HEALTH BELIEFS ON YOUNG MEN'S PRACTICE OF TESTICULAR SELF-EXAMINATION. 1989.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Testicular self examination"
Jones, Irene Heywood. "Breast and Testicular Self-examination." In Skills Update, 8–9. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13969-9_4.
Full text"Testicular Self-Examination." In Adult-Gerontology Practice Guidelines. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/9780826159311.0161.
Full text"Testicular Self-Examination." In Canadian Family Practice Guidelines. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/9780826194985.0149.
Full text"Testicular Self-Examination." In Adult-Gerontology Practice Guidelines. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/9780826195197.0161.
Full text"Testicular Self-Examination, Family." In Family Practice Guidelines. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/9780826153425.0025ef.
Full textMurray, R. C., S. M. Crawford, and CP Shinn. "An Evaluation of a Testicular Self-Examination Video." In Germ Cell Tumours III, 433. Elsevier, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-042198-8.50105-9.
Full text