Contents
Academic literature on the topic 'Thailand Research Collaboration'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Thailand Research Collaboration.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Thailand Research Collaboration"
1
Boontanon, Nithirat, and Gamolporn Sonsri. "District-level Collaboration for Improving Quality of Life of Older People in Thailand." Lex localis - Journal of Local Self-Government 21, no. 4 (2023): 937–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.4335/21.4.937-958(2023).
Full textAbstract:
Thailand established district-level collaborations to improve citizens' quality of life and promote self-governance. Despite successful district-level collaborations to improve the quality of life (QoL) of older people through long-term care (LTC) policies, a lack of analysis of the collaborative process across the country persisted. To address this gap in knowledge, this study aimed to analyze the collaborative process at the district level in implementing LTC activities in Thailand. In this study, qualitative research was employed to collect data through in-depth interviews and non-participating observations during collaborative meetings in four regions of Thailand. The findings of this study indicate that in Thailand, district-level collaboration was overseen by the Committee for the Improvement of the Quality of Life at the District Level (CIQ), which comprised representatives from the public, private, and civil sectors. The CIQ was responsible for improving the QoL of older people and its activities included member selection, appointment, problem identification, problem prioritization, problem-solving planning, task delegation, joint operation, and monitoring. This collaboration was implemented in accordance with legal preferences for decentralization and has contributed to the effective and appropriate implementation of LTC operations. Furthermore, the collaborative approach utilized in this study may also be applicable to other collaborative operations.
2
Safreed-Harmon, Kelly, David A. Cooper, Joep MA Lange, Chris Duncombe, and Praphan Phanuphak. "The HIV Netherlands Australia Thailand research collaboration." AIDS 18, no. 15 (2004): 1971–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00002030-200410210-00001.
Full text
3
Charungkaittikul, Suwithida, Sornnate Areesophonpichet, and Watcharapol Malaiwong. "Fostering Self-Direction in Foresight and Skills Anticipation of Undergraduate Students Through University-Industry Engagement." International Journal of Adult Education and Technology 12, no. 3 (2021): 47–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/ijaet.2021070104.
Full textAbstract:
University-industry engagement is an essential factor for students' learning outcomes in higher education. This study aims to describe the unique educational process using foresight and skills anticipation through the university-industry engagement of future signs for the Thailand project as a good practice to foster self-direction of undergraduate students and proposes strategies to enhance collaboration among different key stakeholders. The “Kizashi Project” was organized during December 2, 2019-March 27, 2020, through the collaboration between Hitachi Asia (Thailand) Company Limited and Chulalongkorn University to create the research and development localization activities for identifying future social trends and anticipating new business opportunities in Thailand. The project applied “Kizashi,” the design thinking field, to describe Thailand's future to illustrate an ideal society with a human-centered perspective. This included Target year, 2030, which might be a milestone year before completing Thailand 4.0.
4
Hamada, Shigeyuki, Naokazu Takeda, and Taroh Kinoshita. "Japan-Thailand Collaboration Research on Infectious Diseases: Promotion and Hurdles." Journal of Disaster Research 9, no. 5 (2014): 784–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2014.p0784.
Full textAbstract:
The Thailand-Japan Research Collaboration Center on Emerging and Re-emerging Infections (RCC-ERI) was established in 2005 by the Research Institute for Microbial Diseases (RIMD), Osaka University, in collaboration with the National Institute of Health (NIH), Department of Medical Sciences (DMSc), Ministry of Public Health (MOPH), Thailand. This was initiated based on the recognition that, with today’s highly developed transportation networks including those between Japan and Thailand, infectious disease outbreak and transmission are no longer limited to a single country. Indeed, such diseases are likely to be transmitted immediately to a third country. This makes it essential to cooperate globally in exchanging information fast and often. A dozen Japanese researchers are working regularly at RCC-ERI, where they conduct joint research with Thai researchers on bacterial and viral infectious diseases prevailing in Thailand that could conceivably affect Japan. Examples of such diseases include cholera, meningitis with Streptococcus suis, AIDS, chikungunya fever, and dengue fever. Conducting long-term research in other countries often reveals gaps in perception due to differences in national laws and regulations, in rules and operating customs within research institutions, in economic and cultural backgrounds, and in values and ways of thinking among individual researchers. RCCERI is being operated as fine adjustments are made to achievemaximumproductivity and developing human resources. Some of the many researchers stationed at the Center faced unpredicted situations such as social chaos due to political instability or evacuation due to flooding and had to take emergency response measures. In this article, we cover aspects related to these experiences.
5
Skar, Lowell, and Pornrat Damrhung. "Roundtables on Performance Research, Developing Cultural Ecologies, and Artistic Research Networking in the Asia-Pacific." Manusya: Journal of Humanities 23, no. 3 (2020): 450–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/26659077-02303012.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract Three sessions of international and local participants from a July 2019 conference created active ecosystems which generated living examples of intercultural improvisation, performance research, cultural ecologies and artistic research in Thailand. Summarized and assessed in this article, these sessions revealed some of the first fruits of Thailand’s work in these areas through engagement with other practitioners in the region. Besides offering creative improvisation among Thai artists and artist-centered critical assessments of their work, the article captures active thinkers seeking to reimagine the “festival” format for performance research, and seeks for ways to continue future regional collaboration in artistic research. The article embodies the ecological aspects of live collective thinking in the arts.
6
Fei, Hongmian. "Research on the Development of Chinese Teaching Resources in Thailand." BCP Education & Psychology 10 (August 16, 2023): 297–308. http://dx.doi.org/10.54691/bcpep.v10i.5398.
Full textAbstract:
Chinese education in Thailand has a long history, but early teaching resources were scarce. It was not until the 21st century that Chinese education in Thailand entered a period of rapid development. This paper systematically reviews the development of Chinese teaching resources in Thailand at different stages, from different sources and of different types. It points out that the early experience of Chinese schools laid a solid foundation for the construction of contemporary Chinese teaching resources. While the development of Chinese teaching resources in Thailand has been rapid, there are still issues such as the lack of top-level design and policy implementation, insufficient teaching resources in higher education, and the need to improve the quality of Chinese teaching resources in vocational education. Suggestions are made to strengthen collaboration from a macro perspective, deepen Sino-Thai cooperation to improve localized teaching resources, and enhance the development of "Chinese + vocational education" teaching resources. These measures will further improve the construction of Chinese teaching resources in Thailand.
7
Ruangpermpool, Somchai, Barbara Igel, and Sununta Siengthai. "Trust and dynamic governance mechanisms in the university-industry R&D alliances." Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management 11, no. 2 (2020): 171–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jstpm-02-2019-0018.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose This paper aims to examine how the dynamic interplay of governance mechanisms of the university-firm R&D alliance reduces obstacles and enables the successful commercialization of research collaboration output. Design/methodology/approach A longitudinal case research and retrospective strategy were used to collect relevant data and information in the four university-and-firm alliance teams collaborating on R&D projects in Thailand during 2008-2014. In-depth interviews and meetings were conducted with representatives of all partners and R&D project teams. Findings The authors found that formal and informal control mechanisms act as complementary forms of governance. The informal control (trust) serves as the frame of intentions whether the formal control is interpreted as a guideline or a commitment. Both formal and informal control mechanisms must be put in place to successfully and sustainably develop collaborative research into a commercial product. Research limitations/implications This study investigated four Thai government-funded research collaboration teams from a single industry. It would be worth investigating such research collaboration in other industries and those without any government funding. Originality/value This study applied an exploratory case research method which is rarely used in research on R&D alliance teams. It generates cross-functional insights on how to build trust in such R&D context, especially in an emerging economy.
8
Rodriguez Espinosa, Patricia, Nipat B. Pichayayothin, Panita Suavansri, et al. "Found in Translation: Reflections and Lessons for Qualitative Research Collaborations Across Language and Culture." International Journal of Qualitative Methods 21 (January 2022): 160940692211012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/16094069221101280.
Full textAbstract:
Qualitative scholars are increasingly engaged in global research where members of the research team are from different countries and cultures and have different primary languages. However, in-depth descriptions of how to work as a transnational team successfully and rigorously are scarce. Using a collaboration between Stanford University in the US and Chulalongkorn University in Thailand as a case example, we present the nuances and challenges experienced in this research collaboration, as well as the strategies employed to optimize the validity and reliability of the study findings. While we started our data analysis following a more typical qualitative analysis path, shortcomings of this approach brought us to explore an alternative, involving data review and coding by transnational coding sub-teams. This approach was better able to illuminate cultural nuances, address coding discrepancies, and bring forward discussions to enhance interpretation and validity of findings. We describe our collaborative and iterative approach, and highlight methodological implications around team composition, language nuances and translation challenges, our coding process involving transnational coding sub-teams, and important considerations for managing team dynamics (e.g., power and hierarchy) and the partnership process and engagement over time. Moreover, we highlight the benefits of integrating insiders and outsiders throughout the research process, from data collection to coding and interpretation. Our process can serve as a model for similar transnational teams seeking ways to fully benefit from cross-cultural research collaborations.
9
Thiamwong, Ladda, Wayne Chong, Rick Kwan, Inthira Roopsawang, Ramraj Gautam, and W. Q. Lou Vivian. "An International Aging Research Collaboration During The COVID-19 Crisis: Mitigating Global Health Consequences." Innovation in Aging 5, Supplement_1 (2021): 141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.544.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract There are several reasons for forming an aging international research collaboration; however, creating a successful and productive research team during the global crisis may require extensive planning and efforts. Our team consists of ten scholars from five countries, including Hong Kong, Nepal, Singapore, Thailand, and the United States. To accomplish this initiative, we employ ten simple rules for establishing international research collaborations proposed by R. de Grijs (2015). We aim to examine impacts of the pandemic on physical activity, frailty, falls, depression and social networks in diverse older adults. We collect data by online survey and/or face-to –face survey using questionnaires including fear of the COVID, face mask use, Social Network, Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity, a simple frailty questionnaire, CDC fall risk checklist, short Fall-Efficacy Scale International and Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Topics of discussion included: research progression, lessons learned and barriers to international collaboration during the COVID-19 crisis.
10
Nakhonsong, Phannavich, and Viyouth Chamruspanth. "Promoting Community Enterprises in Thailand: Challenges and Opportunities." Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental 18, no. 4 (2024): e06505. http://dx.doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n4-123.
Full textAbstract:
Objective: The study examines how policy implementation, policy network management, and capacity building can help promote community enterprises in Thailand. Theoretical Framework: A theoretical approach has been used in this study. Concepts such as Small and Micro Community Enterprise Policies, Policy Networks, Policy Implementation, and Community Enterprise Management Potential have been considered. Method: This qualitative study examined how policy implementation, policy network management, and capacity building can help promote community enterprises in Thailand. Several government agencies and community enterprises were interviewed for the research. While community enterprise promotion policies are widely supported, there are challenges in tailoring them to local contexts and ensuring effective collaboration among stakeholders. Bottom-up and context-sensitive policymaking is needed, as well as stronger interorganizational coordination and data sharing mechanisms. Results and Discussion: The research highlights the importance of tailoring policies to local contexts, fostering collaboration among stakeholders, and addressing capacity building needs in a comprehensive manner to promote the success of community enterprises in Thailand. The findings offer guidance for policymakers and practitioners while also suggesting areas for further research to deepen understanding and inform future interventions. Research Implications: This study contributes to a more nuanced understanding of what it takes to promote community enterprises in Thailand and offers valuable guidance for policymakers and practitioners working to support community-based entrepreneurship. The findings underscore the importance of context-sensitive policies, strong collaboration among stakeholders, and a holistic approach to capacity building. Originality/Value: The study contributes to a nuanced understanding of what shapes community enterprise success in Thailand. This report offers policymakers and practitioners valuable insights into creating an enabling environment for community-based entrepreneurship.