Relevant bibliographies by topics / Theories of International Relations / Journal articles
To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Theories of International Relations.

Journal articles on the topic 'Theories of International Relations'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 10 March 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Theories of International Relations.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Lawler, Peter. "Theories of international relations." International Affairs 73, no. 1 (January 1997): 153. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2623557.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Harris, Ian. "Classical theories of international relations." International Affairs 73, no. 1 (January 1997): 152. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2623556.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Kafandaris, Stelios, and Michael Nicholson. "Formal Theories in International Relations." Journal of the Operational Research Society 41, no. 9 (September 1990): 889. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2583512.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Kafandaris, Stelios. "Formal Theories in International Relations." Journal of the Operational Research Society 41, no. 9 (September 1990): 889–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/jors.1990.134.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Krotki, Karol J., and M. Nicholson. "Formal Theories in International Relations." Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society) 154, no. 2 (1991): 364. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2983055.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Balan, Dinu. "Parisian Perspectives on International Relations Theories." Codrul Cosminului 27, no. 1 (2021): 285–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.4316/cc.2021.01.014.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Walt, Stephen M. "International Relations: One World, Many Theories." Foreign Policy, no. 110 (1998): 29. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1149275.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Zalewski, Marysia. "Political Theories of International Relations (review)." Journal of World History 13, no. 2 (2002): 529–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jwh.2002.0058.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Lerner, Hanna, and Amir Lupovici. "Constitution-making and International Relations Theories." International Studies Perspectives 20, no. 4 (July 19, 2019): 412–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekz007.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract Constitution-making has become an intrinsic component of international politics, nevertheless, international relations scholars largely refrain from theorizing it tending to view formal constitutional drafting as a domestic project. The article proposes an understanding of constitution-making as an international (in addition to national) political phenomenon. We develop a new and comprehensive classification of international influences on constitution-making. We also demonstrate how the empirical study of constitution-making can illuminate overlooked areas of research and challenge existing international relations theories. Our focus here is on the study of international norms. We present three theoretical insights concerning the emergence of international norms, their dissemination, and the role of epistemic communities in facilitating their expansion. We conclude by highlighting how the interaction between international and domestic factors in the crafting of constitutions further challenges the disciplinary distinction between domestic and international politics.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Köstem, Seçkin. "International Relations Theories and Turkish International Relations: Observations Based on a Book." All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace 4, no. 1 (January 9, 2015): 59. http://dx.doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.167333.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Kertzer, Joshua D. "Microfoundations in international relations." Conflict Management and Peace Science 34, no. 1 (September 19, 2016): 81–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0738894216665488.

Full text
Abstract:
Many of our theories of international politics rely on microfoundations. In this short note, I suggest that although there has been increasing interest in microfoundations in international relations (IR) over the past 20 years, the frequency with which the concept is invoked belies a surprising lack of specificity about what microfoundations are, or explicit arguments about why we should study them. I then offer an argument about the value of micro-level approaches to the study of conflict. My claim is not that all theories of IR need to be developed or tested at the micro-level in order to be satisfying, but rather, that many of our theories in IR already rest on lower-level mechanisms—they either leave these assumptions unarticulated or fail to test them directly. In these circumstances, theorizing and testing micro-level dynamics will be especially helpful. I illustrate my argument using the case of resolve, one of the central explanatory variables in the study of international security. I argue that the absence of microfoundations for resolve is one reason why IR scholars have had difficulties testing whether resolve has the effects we often claim, and sketch out a two-stage research design political scientists can use to study unobservable phenomena.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Williams, Michael C. "Hobbes and international relations: a reconsideration." International Organization 50, no. 2 (1996): 213–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s002081830002854x.

Full text
Abstract:
Hobbes has long been a central figure in the theory of international relations. He has also been a badly misunderstood one. While often invoked to support contemporary theories of international politics, Hobbes's thinking actually challenges rational-choice theories, the structural realism of Kenneth Waltz, and the “rationalist” approach of the English school. Indeed, the skeptical foundations of his political vision place him closer to contemporary postpositivist positions, though here, too, his views raise difficult and important questions for such a stance. In general, Hobbes's theory of international relations focuses not upon the determinations of anarchy in any conventional sense but upon issues of knowledge, ideology, and legitimacy in the construction of political orders both domestically and internationally.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

HASENCLEVER, ANDREAS, PETER MAYER, and VOLKER RITTBERGER. "Integrating theories of international regimes." Review of International Studies 26, no. 1 (January 2000): 3–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0260210500000036.

Full text
Abstract:
Several years after students of international relations started to ask questions about international regimes, there continues to be a strong scholarly interest in the principles, norms, rules, and decision-making procedures that govern the behaviour of states in particular issue-areas. Indeed, international regimes have been a major focus of theoretical and empirical research in International Relations for many years now. Three schools of thought have shaped the discussion thus far: neoliberalism, which bases its analyses on constellations of interests; realism, which treats power relations among states as its key variable; and cognitivism, which emphasizes actors' causal and social knowledge. Each of these schools of thought has articulated and defended a distinct view on the origins, stability, and consequences of international regimes. In this article we explore the possibilities of achieving additional explanatory power in the study of international regimes by working toward a synthesis of these schools of thought.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

Gupta, Arvind. "International Relations Theories and the Contemporary World." Strategic Analysis 32, no. 6 (October 23, 2008): 1155–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09700160802412987.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Więcławski, Jacek. "Considering Rationality of Realist International Relations Theories." Chinese Political Science Review 5, no. 2 (February 5, 2020): 111–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41111-020-00144-3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

Graff-Mcrae, Rebecca. "Theories of International relations and Northern Ireland." Irish Studies Review 28, no. 2 (March 30, 2020): 272–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09670882.2020.1748137.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

Walsh, Dawn. "Theories of international relations and Northern Ireland." Irish Political Studies 33, no. 3 (November 9, 2017): 415–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07907184.2017.1401313.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

Wedderburn, Alister. "Tragedy, genealogy and theories of International Relations." European Journal of International Relations 24, no. 1 (February 9, 2017): 177–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354066116689131.

Full text
Abstract:
This article interrogates the role of tragedy within the work of International Relations theorists including Michael Dillon, Mervyn Frost, Richard Ned Lebow and Hans Morgenthau. It argues that a tragic sensibility is a constituent part of much thinking about politics and the international, and asks what the reasons for this preoccupation might be. Noting that a number of diverse theoretical appeals to tragedy in International Relations invoke analytically similar understandings of tragic-political subjectivity, the article problematises these by building on Michel Foucault’s intermittent concern with the genre in his Collège de France lecture series. It proposes that a genealogical consideration of tragedy enables an alertness to its political associations and implications that asks questions of the way in which it is commonly conceived within the discipline. The article concludes by suggesting that International Relations theorists seeking to invoke tragedy must think carefully about the ontological, epistemological, ethical and political claims associated with such a move.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

Kelly, Laura. "Poverty and International Relations Theory." Politikon: The IAPSS Journal of Political Science 10 (November 1, 2005): 23–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.22151/politikon.10.2.

Full text
Abstract:
World Poverty. Why has this problem persisted through years of unprecedented economic growth throughout most of the world? This paper proposes that the problem is theoretical. The main theories, such as Realism and Modernization rely on fundamental assumptions such as international order through the maintenance of state power, or free market ideology, which serve to exacerbate, rather than solve, the problem of poverty. The result is either the misrepresentation of poverty, or the blatant ignorance of its existence by these dominant theories.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

Scherrer, Christoph. "Critical International Relations. Kritik am neorealistischen Paradigma der internationalen Beziehungen." PROKLA. Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialwissenschaft 24, no. 95 (June 1, 1994): 303–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.32387/prokla.v24i95.1004.

Full text
Abstract:
»Critical International Relations« versuchen positivismuskritische Theorien für das Fach Internationale Beziehungen fruchtbar zu machen. Bezugspunkte sind dabei u. a. Gendertheorien, Gramscianische Ansätze, die Kritische Theorie und der Poststrukturalismus. Vorgestellt werden die CIR-Arbeiten anhand ihrer Kritik am vorherrschenden Paradigma der Internationalen Beziehungen, dem Neorealismus.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Nuruzzaman, Mohammed. "Western and Islamic International Theories." International Studies 55, no. 2 (April 2018): 106–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0020881718790687.

Full text
Abstract:
Islamic theories of international relations (IR) have been traditionally dominated by debates between two distinct approaches—traditionalism and modernism. A third perspective, often labelled the ‘jihadist perspective’, has emerged following the 11 September 2001 attacks and this radical perspective principally embodies the worldview of al-Qaeda and its off-shoot the Islamic State. The jihadist perspective directly challenges the Western concepts, methods and theories of IR. This article examines how the Islamic and Western international theories clash in terms of ontological foundations, epistemological approaches and modes of inquiry. It argues that Islamic discourse on IR has contributed to the development of a set of theories to analyse and interpret relations between the Islamic and the non-Islamic world, and secondly, it implicitly presents arguments in favour of opening up IR for rather more global perspectives.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

Dunne, Tim, Lene Hansen, and Colin Wight. "The end of International Relations theory?" European Journal of International Relations 19, no. 3 (September 2013): 405–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354066113495485.

Full text
Abstract:
With a view to providing contextual background for the Special Issue, this opening article analyses several dimensions of ‘The end of International Relations theory?’ It opens with a consideration of the status of different types of theory. Thereafter, we look at the proliferation of theories that has taken place since the emergence of the third/fourth debate. The coexistence and competition between an ever-greater number of theories begs the question: what kind of theoretical pluralism should IR scholars embrace? We offer a particular account of theoretical engagement that is preferable to the alternatives currently being practised: integrative pluralism. The article ends on a cautiously optimistic note: given the disciplinary competition that now exists in relation to explaining and understanding global social forces, International Relations may find resilience because it has become theory-led, theory-literate and theory-concerned.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Miles Kahler, and Alexander H. Montgomery. "Network Analysis for International Relations." International Organization 63, no. 3 (July 2009): 559–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0020818309090195.

Full text
Abstract:
International relations research has regarded networks as a particular mode of organization, distinguished from markets or state hierarchies. In contrast, network analysis permits the investigation and measurement of network structures—emergent properties of persistent patterns of relations among agents that can define, enable, and constrain those agents. Network analysis offers both a toolkit for identifying and measuring the structural properties of networks and a set of theories, typically drawn from contexts outside international relations, that relate structures to outcomes. Network analysis challenges conventional views of power in international relations by defining network power in three different ways: access, brokerage, and exit options. Two issues are particularly important to international relations: the ability of actors to increase their power by enhancing and exploiting their network positions, and the fungibility of network power. The value of network analysis in international relations has been demonstrated in precise description of international networks, investigation of network effects on key international outcomes, testing of existing network theory in the context of international relations, and development of new sources of data. Partial or faulty incorporation of network analysis, however, risks trivial conclusions, unproven assertions, and measures without meaning. A three-part agenda is proposed for future application of network analysis to international relations: import the toolkit to deepen research on international networks; test existing network theories in the domain of international relations; and test international relations theories using the tools of network analysis.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

Haggard, Stephan, and Beth A. Simmons. "Theories of international regimes." International Organization 41, no. 3 (1987): 491–517. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0020818300027569.

Full text
Abstract:
Over the last decade, international regimes have become a major focus of empirical research and theoretical debate within international relations. This article provides a critical review of this literature. We survey contending definitions of regimes and suggest dimensions along which regimes vary over time or across cases; these dimensions might be used to operationalize “regime change.” We then examine four approaches to regime analysis: structural, game-theoretic, functional, and cognitive. We conclude that the major shortcoming of the regimes literature is its failure to incorporate domestic politics adequately. We suggest a research program that begins with the central insights of the interdependence literature which have been ignored in the effort to construct “systemic” theory.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

Chugrov, S. "Sources and Trends of Japanese International Relations Theories." World Economy and International Relations 64, no. 5 (2020): 73–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-5-73-83.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

Crano, William D., Donald M. Taylor, and Fathali M. Moghaddam. "Theories of Intergroup Relations: International Social Psychological Perspectives." Political Psychology 17, no. 4 (December 1996): 815. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3792147.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

Devetak, Richard. "Theories, practices and postmodernism in international relations 1." Cambridge Review of International Affairs 12, no. 2 (March 1999): 61–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09557579908400243.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

WANG, YIWEI. "Between Science and Art: Questionable International Relations Theories." Japanese Journal of Political Science 8, no. 02 (June 8, 2007): 191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1468109907002629.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

Zhang, Yuwei. "Analyze Russia's Foreign Relations with Three Main Theories of International Relations." Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences 1 (July 6, 2022): 27–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v1i.625.

Full text
Abstract:
With the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, Russia's foreign relations and diplomatic strategy have become the focus of academic research. However, previous studies on Russian diplomatic relations tend to start from a single theoretical perspective. Although this approach is detailed and in-depth enough, countries do not develop diplomatic strategies from a single perspective, so it is difficult to fully explain Russia's diplomatic motives from a single perspective. This paper will analyze Russia's foreign relations, and speculate the deep needs and diplomatic logic of The Russian authorities in the Russia-Ukraine crisis from the three mainstream theories. The analysis method this paper adopted was literature review, and all papers cited were from CNKI and Google Scholar. Through the analysis and comparison, it is obvious that Russia mainly maintains the neorealist diplomatic strategy in the conflict with Ukraine. Russia aims to maintain the neutral status of Ukraine and promote the establishment of an alliance to compete with the US-led NATO countries. From the perspective of the three major theories, this paper comprehensively analyzes Russia's foreign relations, which is conducive to providing a new analytical perspective for the Conflict between Russia and Ukraine. It can rationally view the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, and have a deeper understanding of the role and purpose of Russia in the conflict, so as to provide help for the settlement of the conflict.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

Faraj, Anwar M., and Tara T. Othman. "Post Positivism and Theoretical Debates in International Relations." Journal of University of Human Development 4, no. 2 (June 30, 2018): 61. http://dx.doi.org/10.21928/juhd.v4n2y2018.pp61-68.

Full text
Abstract:
This research deals with the problem of the failure of the positivist-rationalist theories of international relations (realism and liberalism) in predicting the end of the Cold War era and a deep understanding of the transformations that have taken place in the field of international relations. This has paved the way for the post- positivist trends, to show their influence in the fourth debate, and demonstrating their response to the challenges of the fifth debate in IR theories. Post-positivism rejected the using of the standards of proof associated with natural sciences in international relations in order to reach similar levels of interpretation, certainty and prediction. The post-positivists participated in the two last great debates of IR theories by emphasizing a number of points, the most important of which were: re-evaluation of the theories based on rational choice, review of the role and functions of theories: description, interpretation and prediction, Non-linearity as a description of contemporary international relations, and the inability of causation to explain the contemporary international relations.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

Bain, William, and Terry Nardin. "International relations and intellectual history." International Relations 31, no. 3 (September 2017): 213–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0047117817723069.

Full text
Abstract:
The history of international thought has traditionally focused on a limited number of canonical texts. Such an approach now seems both naive and parochial. International Relations scholars often read their own ideas into these texts instead of getting ideas from them – ideas that if properly understood have the potential to undermine theirs. By ignoring non-canonical texts, we overlook resources that are not only necessary to establish the historical contexts of canonical writings but that can also help theorists of International Relations to understand their subject better. Judgements of what is and is not canonical are in any case themselves context-bound and contestable. Intellectual history can help us understand how the International Relations canon was constructed and for what purposes. It can also counter the abstractions of theory by reminding us not only that theories are abstractions from the activities of people living in particular times and places but also that our own theories are embedded in historicity. In these and other ways, paying attention to intellectual history expands the repertoire of ideas on which International Relations theorists can draw and against which they can measure their conclusions. The articles in this issue illustrate these points in relation to a wide range of texts and contexts. They suggest that whether one approaches international relations from the angle of description, explanation, policy or ethics, knowing how past thinkers have understood the subject can lead to better informed and more robust scholarship.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

Onwutuebe, Chidiebere J. "Theories of International Relations and the Fluidity of the International Political System." Journal of Contemporary International Relations and Diplomacy 3, no. 2 (December 30, 2022): 587–602. http://dx.doi.org/10.53982/jcird.2022.0302.06-j.

Full text
Abstract:
The international political system continues to undergo varying degrees of permutation which often beckon the need to (re)appraise, contest, revise and reposition hitherto existing theories of international relations with a view to achieving relative precision in the analysis of global events. Recent developments in the international political system resonate and validate the fluidity and evolving nature of theories of international relations as tools required to describe, explain, analyse and predict global trends. This study underscores the place and role of prevailing global forces in shaping the nature, direction and character of theories of international relations. It demonstrated ways in which centripetal and centrifugal subtleties of the international system orchestrate new political thoughts and search for more apposite theoretical frameworks necessary to capture the exigencies of emerging world realties. Secondary data and descriptive method of analyses were used in the study. The study showed that regardless of the usefulness of theories of international relations in creating relevant links necessary to explain observable scenarios in the global arena, their importance resides largely in their capacity to reasonably account for global actions, behaviours and events irrespective of differences in historical time boundaries as well as variations in geographies. In conclusion, the study stressed the susceptibility of theories of international relations to vagaries of an ever-evolving international system majorly characterized by trends in peace and war, cooperation and conflicts, conflictual national foreign policy objectives as well as general interest of states and non-state actors.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

Kulumbayeva, B. О., S. К. Aliyeva, and Zh M. Medeubayeva. "Фактор науки и технологий в теориях международных отношений." BULLETIN of the L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University.Political Science. Regional Studies. Oriental Studies. Turkology Series. 139, no. 2 (2022): 42–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.32523/2616-6887/2022-139-2-42-50.

Full text
Abstract:
The article examines the factor of science and technology in the theories of international relations from classical paradigms, political realism, and liberalism/neoliberalism to modern concepts of social constructivism and science, technology, and society STS at the interface with international relations. On the one hand, researchers recognize the importance of this factor, especially against the background of increasing globalization, in the modern era of rapid development of information and communication technologies and universal digitalization. On the other hand, there is a gap in the academic literature in the theoretical understanding of the mutual influence of science, technology, and international relations. The relevance of the topic is due to conceptualizing theoretical approaches in the context of the problem of Kazakhstan's integration into the global scientific space. As a result of the analysis, one of the most acceptable concepts reflecting modern trends in the interdependence and interdependence of science, technological innovations in society, and international relations, in the opinion of the authors, is an interdisciplinary field - science and technology in society. Based on the prospects for further integration of Kazakhstan into the international academic community, at the initial stage, such an approach involves the establishment and expansion of interdisciplinary ties both in scientific research and in the development and implementation of state projects and programs in the field of science and technology in the Republic of Kazakhstan
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

He, Gang. "Practice Theory in International Relations." Scientific and Social Research 4, no. 6 (June 20, 2022): 37–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.26689/ssr.v4i6.4040.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper reviews the practice turn in the international relations studies, and the development of its related theories. This paper, particularly focuses on the use of practice theory from different perspectives, further proposed a new hypothesis for the practice theory. In the future, this research may provide an idea for the development of the practice theory.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

Holsti, K. J. "The Necrologists of International Relations." Canadian Journal of Political Science 18, no. 4 (December 1985): 675–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0008423900059539.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractTwo contemporary streams of thought in international relations offer significant theoretical challenges to the field and to the way it has been organized since the time of Rousseau. New power cycle theories propose that the etiology of war resides in different growth rates among the major powers. Hegemonic wars are a recurrent consequence of the states system. The literature suggests that the patterns of the past are likely to be repeated in future; hence, the only solution to the problem of war is the transcendence of the states system. The second body of literature proposes that growing interdependence is bringing profound structural changes that are already leading to the demise of the nation state and to the transformation of the states system. The essay critically examines these theories and outlines reasons why both are empirically and logically deficient. These bodies of literature also illustrate how even among rigorous quantitative analysts, normative concerns animate research. Finally, the author suggests why the search for a theory or model of international politics is doomed to failure, and why a healthy field will be characterized by intellectual pluralism.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

Polcumpally, Arun Teja. "Non –Traditional Security Approach in International relations :." Jindal Journal of International Affairs 2, no. 5 (December 1, 2021): 44–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.54945/jjia.v2i5.73.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper explores the phenomenon of Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS or IS) brides and tries to explain their role in global politics through the International Relations (IR) theories. Further, it argues that the approaches of critical securitization theory would be enriched by accommodating newer agencies into the explanatory models of IR. Historical agency considerations, the emancipation of the Islamic minorities in several countries, and deriving alternatives to the problem are much needed in the 21st century. With all such developments and the rapidly changing geopolitical dynamics, one must re-structure theories in understanding the changed geopolitics. It must answer how the nature and role of ISIS brides is critical in comprehending Middle-Eastern politics, European Islamophobia, etc. The factors mentioned above, even though considered in the traditional approaches, critical securitization theory provides an agency to them. Accordingly, the paper concludes that the critical theories are the product of decades of scientific debates and would be the priority framework to examine the international issues in future
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

Peterson, V. Spike. "Transgressing Boundaries: Theories of Knowledge, Gender and International Relations." Millennium: Journal of International Studies 21, no. 2 (June 1992): 183–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03058298920210020401.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

Inoguchi, Takashi. "Are there any theories of international relations in Japan?" International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 7, no. 3 (May 21, 2007): 369–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcm015.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

Brands, Maarten. "The Obsolescence of almost all theories concerning International Relations." European Review 6, no. 3 (August 1998): 349–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1062798700003392.

Full text
Abstract:
The implosion of the Soviet empire undermined most theories concerning International Relations. Only a few political scientists have conceded afterwards the weakness of their theories, which were mostly ahistorical, based on the deformation of politics with history omitted. The question asked in this article is what kind of International Relations as a discipline may be more reliable and helpful in the future.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

Fearon, James D. "DOMESTIC POLITICS, FOREIGN POLICY, AND THEORIES OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS." Annual Review of Political Science 1, no. 1 (June 1998): 289–313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.1.1.289.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

Telò, Mario. "Building a Common Language in Pluralist International Relations Theories." Chinese Journal of International Politics 13, no. 3 (2020): 455–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poaa009.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract This article aims to contribute to the gradual building of a common scientific language within the world International Relations (IR) epistemic community. The author shares the objective, indicated by many leading Chinese scholars, of a pluralist IR theory that goes beyond Western-centric mainstream theories to provide a European continental perspective. Such a perspective takes stock, on the one hand, of the legacy of Gramsci, Bobbio, and Habermas, and, on the other, of the theoretical implications of European unity as a sophisticated instance of regional cooperation. Since the dialogue must be at the highest possible theoretical level, the author selects as main partners two leading theories from the increasingly rich and internally various Chinese IR scholarship: the books recently published in English by Qin Yaqing and Yan Xuetong, who represent—not only in China, but at world level—two fundamental references in the international theoretical debate. They lead two innovative approaches: Qin’s relational theory and Yan’s theory of moral realism. The author discusses their main theses and concepts regarding IRT and global governance in a free, open, and dialectic way, notably, the balance between background cultures and multilateral convergence; and the differences between the crucial concepts of hegemony, domination, and leadership, as well as alternative perspectives on global governance within a multipolar world—a new post-hegemonic multilateralism? Or a bipolar global power structure competing for leadership?
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

Humphreys, Adam R. C. "The heuristic application of explanatory theories in International Relations." European Journal of International Relations 17, no. 2 (February 22, 2010): 257–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354066109344008.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

Moon, Chung-in, and Taehwan Kim. "International Relations Studies in South Korea." Journal of East Asian Studies 2, no. 1 (February 2002): 45–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1598240800000667.

Full text
Abstract:
In this paper, we review and summarize recent trends of international relations studies in South Korea on three distinct dimensions and, on the basis of this, suggest future directions of research in the field. Our focus throughout the paper is on the constraints and opportunities for the development of indigenous international relations theories and models. Although the confrontational Cold War legacy on the Korean Peninsula sustains the validity of the powerful realist paradigm, we argue that critical challenges are breathing a new life into the academic field of international relations in a time of great change when a new global and regional order has been taking shape since the end of the Cold War. In order to accommodate these new changes and call attention to epistemological pluralism, we posit liberal constructivism, which combines liberalism with constructivism, as a new epistemological alternative to the existing lines of international relations theories. Given the opportunities and intellectual resources, we conclude, the future of the discipline of international relations in South Korea is quite promising.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

Ali, Omran. "Conflict and Cooperation in International Relations: Theoretical Contributions of the Debate between New Realism and Neoliberalism." Humanities Journal of University of Zakho 8, no. 4 (December 30, 2020): 659–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.26436/hjuoz.2020.8.4.653.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper deals with the debate between neo-realism and neo-liberalism within the field of international relations and highlights the most important propositions of the two theories, especially regarding their views on the structure of international relations and whether it is characterized by anarchy and conflict or cooperation. The study of conflict and cooperation in international relations has been one of the main tasks of research and analysis for theorists and researchers of international relations, and this conflict-cooperation nexus has become the main issue in the debate between the two prevailing theories in international relations. Neorealism and neoliberalism are the most influential theories on international relations, and the debate between them has considered one of the most important one in the field of international relations. This research seeks to clarify and explain the theoretical contributions of each of the two theories regarding conflict and cooperation in international relations, and the extent to which neoliberal assumptions, especially with regard to the role of international institutions in increasing international cooperation, has contributed to reducing the dominance of the realistic vision in international relations, especially with regard to conflict and anarchy. It argues that the debate between neorealism and neoliberalism did not significantly contribute to developing the theory of international relations, as this debate did not contribute significantly to reducing the dominance of power politics in international relations and solving the international problems resulting from it.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

Smith, Steve. "Theories of foreign policy: an historical overview." Review of International Studies 12, no. 1 (January 1986): 13–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s026021050011410x.

Full text
Abstract:
Although it is natural to consider the development of the comparative approach known as Foreign Policy Analysis (FPA) as the most obvious source of theories of foreign policy behaviour, it is important to remember that all perspectives on the subject of international relations contain statements about foreign policy. Historically this has been the case because virtually all approaches to the study of international relations took the state to be the central actor. Thus, approaches as diverse as those concentrating on political economy, international society and Marxism have all included a notion of what the state is and how its foreign policy results, regardless of the way in which policy might be defined. Theories of foreign policy are therefore intrinsic to theories of international relations, even for those who deny the centrality of the state as an actor in international society.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

Mitchell, Christopher. "International Migration, International Relations and Foreign Policy." International Migration Review 23, no. 3 (September 1989): 681–708. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019791838902300315.

Full text
Abstract:
Recent literature on migration, international relations and foreign policy is reviewed in this article, stressing applications of global systems paradigms, studies of state entry and exit rules, and anatomies of domestic policy-setting processes on migration. After a concise assessment of the contemporary theory of global political economy, the paper argues for seeking midrange generalizations on the international relations of migration. It also suggests that analysis begin with the policy-setting processes of the state. Especially through the use of comparative perspectives available from domestic policymaking studies and from the field of international comparative public policy, this approach offers the opportunity to fix empirically the political roles of transnational social forces, which often present themselves as participants in domestic policy contests. Promising future directions in the study of state-to-state relations are also evaluated, with the anticipation that verifying regional or other intermediate patterns of world migration politics may contribute to more general theories of international political economy.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

Kochetkov, V. V. "International relations in the interpretation of theories of Historical sociology." Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science 25, no. 3 (October 28, 2019): 49–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2019-25-3-49-70.

Full text
Abstract:
International affairs specialists turn to historical sociology to explain the world political realities that remain hidden to other theories of international relations. However, in the national scientific tradition, historians, sociologists, and international affairs specialists give it unjustly little attention, despite the fact that the science of international relations is at the intersection of history and sociology. This article intended to compensate to some extent for the lack of information about this most interesting and promising approach to the study of international relations. The author formulates the concept of historical sociology and characterizes three main directions in its development. The first direction gives priority to the explanation of international relations of such factors, as types of power and methods of production. The second direction considers the events of international life through the prism of morality, culture, emotions and other spiritual components. The third direction seeks to unite the first two groups of research approaches within a single explanatory framework.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

Fioretos, Orfeo. "Historical Institutionalism in International Relations." International Organization 65, no. 2 (April 2011): 367–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0020818311000002.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThis article reviews recent contributions to International Relations (IR) that engage the substantive concerns of historical institutionalism and explicitly and implicitly employ that tradition's analytical features to address fundamental questions in the study of international affairs. It explores the promise of this tradition for new research agendas in the study of international political development, including the origin of state preferences, the nature of governance gaps, and the nature of change and continuity in the international system. The article concludes that the analytical and substantive profiles of historical institutionalism can further disciplinary maturation in IR, and it proposes that the field be more open to the tripartite division of institutional theories found in other subfields of Political Science.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

Mexhuani, Burim. "The Foreign Affairs of a State is Based on Its Strength in the International System." European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research 10, no. 2 (May 19, 2017): 322. http://dx.doi.org/10.26417/ejser.v10i2.p322-325.

Full text
Abstract:
Neorealists say that a country's Foreign Affairs is based on its power or position as the power that has a state in the international system. Field of International Relations based on international legal policies and norms; It can be defined by different political perspectives and phenomena, depending on certain theories. Theories are the best determinant of defining policies in the International System. For a long time, in the international system have dominated realistic, liberal and radical theories; After the Second World War for the purposes of explaining or defining international policies, other theories, including neo-realism, were listed. As a structured theory versus reality that defined the theory of alignment for defining political theories in the international system. In International Relations there is no central authority or world government, the state and the international environment is in a state of anarchy, which pushes the states to create the conditions to create an environment where they can survive. Special studies of International Relations theory were spurred especially after World War I and World War II. The neorealistic theory itself contains some elements that differ from other theories and that as its base takes the strength or position of power of states in the international system. Responses to the framework of action, the theories are directed as perimeters to solve the problems of the international system. The international relations system may be positioned in other circumstances when a power is not balanced, depending on the different circumstances of politics and politicians
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

Zakharov, Timofey. "MULTILATERALISM IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS AND CHALLENGES OF GLOBAL GOVERNING." Pravovedenie IAZH, no. 4 (2022): 205–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.31249/rgpravo/2022.04.17.

Full text
Abstract:
The review presents the debatable positions of scientists on the development of international relations and international law, the role and importance of international organizations in this process. The problems of international politics are touched upon. The review presents an attempt to apply constitutional theories in the law of international organizations. The current situation of the UN and WHO is considered.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the bibliographies on the topic 'Theories of International Relations' for other source types:
Dissertations / Theses Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography