Academic literature on the topic 'Third Party Inspection'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Third Party Inspection.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Third Party Inspection"
ISHIGAI, Seikan. "Quickening of Third-Party Inspection System in Japan." Journal of the Society of Mechanical Engineers 89, no. 812 (1986): 720–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1299/jsmemag.89.812_720.
Full textPetersen, DR, RE Link, and A. Kay. "Third-Party Inspection Agency Response to Changing Needs." Journal of Testing and Evaluation 24, no. 1 (1996): 32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1520/jte11286j.
Full textXu, Wei Pu, Lie Gao Wang, Hong Bo Ma, and Yi Ting Liu. "The Third Party Inspection Research of Valves for Liquefied Natural Gas Project." Advanced Materials Research 1006-1007 (August 2014): 367–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.1006-1007.367.
Full textAvenhaus, R. "APPLICATIONS OF INSPECTION GAMES." Mathematical Modelling and Analysis 9, no. 3 (September 30, 2004): 179–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/13926292.2004.9637251.
Full textKunreuther, Howard C., Patrick J. McNulty, and Yong Kang. "Third-Party Inspection as an Alternative to Command and Control Regulation." Risk Analysis 22, no. 2 (April 2002): 309–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.00029.
Full textSugita, Yoshihiro. "OS1-5 Periodic inspection by third party for safety of elevator." Proceedings of the Industrial, Chemical Machinery & Safety Division Conference 2012 (2012): 21–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1299/jsmeicm.2012.21.
Full textFeder, Judy. "Best Practices for Avoiding Erosion in Annular Fracturing." Journal of Petroleum Technology 73, no. 06 (June 1, 2021): 46–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/0621-0046-jpt.
Full textStarobin, Shana, and Erika Weinthal. "The Search for Credible Information in Social and Environmental Global Governance: The Kosher Label." Business and Politics 12, no. 3 (October 2010): 1–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.2202/1469-3569.1322.
Full textZhang, Ling Ling, Gang Fu, and Xian Fu Wang. "Application of the FTA in the Risk Management of Refined Oil Pipeline." Applied Mechanics and Materials 226-228 (November 2012): 2211–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.226-228.2211.
Full textMishra, Mowmita, Soumya Kanti Hota, Santanu Kumar Ghosh, and Biswajit Sarkar. "Controlling Waste and Carbon Emission for a Sustainable Closed-Loop Supply Chain Management under a Cap-and-Trade Strategy." Mathematics 8, no. 4 (March 27, 2020): 466. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/math8040466.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Third Party Inspection"
Fang, Tsai Shih, and 蔡石芳. "A study on fulfilling fire safety inspection system with the third-party fire fighting." Thesis, 2010. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/10310324453291114260.
Full textHsieh, Tung-Hsun, and 謝東勳. "The Feasibility Study of Outsourcing Trusted Third Party for Architectural Construction Site Inspection in New Taipei City." Thesis, 2018. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/y4865c.
Full text國立中央大學
土木工程學系在職專班
106
Taiwan is located at the boundary between the Philippine Sea Plate and the Eurasian Plate.With more than 33 active faults in the main island, Taiwan is an earthquake prone region. Earthquakes often cause irreversible damage to the structures and pose serious threats to the public. Asides from the structural design to improve the earthquake resistance level of the buildings, the construction quality is also an important part. It is an urgent and essential issue to improve the construction quality of buildings for the government. New Taipei City has an estimated population of 4 million within 2,503 square kilometers. Its number and the scale of architectural projects is the top of the five major cities in Taiwan for years. Article 56 of the Construction Law clearly stated that for the parts of construction works that require inspection, the municipal or county (city) competent authority of construction shall, upon approval of the construction plan, designate the constructor together with the supervisor to submit reports in time before to continue construction, and the competent authority of construction may carry out inspection at any time. The mechanism for inspections do exist, however, the authority does not have enough administrative and adequate human resources to conduct thorough architectural construction inspections. The existing mechanism seems to be insufficient to ensure the construction quality of buildings. Gradually, the ideas of commissioning trusted third party by the authority to ensure the construction quality are generated. The means of the commissioning may be carried out by requesting professional associations to appoint experts who are competent, capable, and willing to take responsibility for the inspections with professional signing and sealing. The feasibility study is conducted through collecting and analyzing data including the existing building regulations and inspecting systems in Taiwan and Japan, the construction works inspection process of the construction works of the New Taipei City Government Works Bureau, and the mechanism and experiences of commissioning the New Taipei City Architects Association in issuing building licenses. Supplemented by questionnaires, the study includes the comments and opinions of the current inspection process and outsourcing inspections from relevant professional practitioners. With above mentioned analysis and discussions, the feasibility study of outsourcing trusted third party for architectural construction site inspection in New Taipei City is conducted. The goal of this study is to achieve a win-win situation by improving construction quality of buildings and ensuring the safety of the buildings for the public without jeopardizing the administrative efficiency.
Books on the topic "Third Party Inspection"
Ray, Sumantra (Shumone), Sue Fitzpatrick, Rajna Golubic, Susan Fisher, and Sarah Gibbings, eds. Archiving. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199608478.003.0023.
Full textBook chapters on the topic "Third Party Inspection"
"Third Party Inspection." In Power Boilers, 151–53. ASME Press, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.859674.ch8.
Full text"Third-Party inspection, testing, and verification." In Identity-Preserved Systems. CRC Press, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781420040241.sec8.
Full text"Section 8: Third-party inspection, testing, and verification." In Identity-Preserved Systems, 123–28. CRC Press, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781420040241-11.
Full textKokemuller, Linda. "The Value of a Third Party Inspection Program During the Construction of Natural Gas Pipelines in Maine." In Environmental Concerns in Rights-of-Way Management: 7th International Symposium, 869–74. Elsevier, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-008044117-7/50095-5.
Full textParkin, Jack. "Grounding Cryptocurrencies." In Money Code Space, 119–60. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197515075.003.0007.
Full textJackson, Ben, and Genevieve Joy. "Mahindra First Choice." In Putting Purpose Into Practice, 354–62. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198870708.003.0032.
Full textCrouch, Dora P. "Natural Models for Water Elements." In Water Management in Ancient Greek Cities. Oxford University Press, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195072808.003.0019.
Full text"Southern Water Authority v Pegrum and Pegrum [1989] Crim LR 442 (DC) Facts: The respondents were charged with an offence contrary to s 31(1) of the Control of Pollution Act 1974, causing polluting matter (pig effluent) to enter a stream. The respondents reared pigs; effluent produced by the pigs was held initially in tanks and then transferred by gravity into a lagoon constructed for the purpose. The lagoon itself was emptied of liquid content for use as manure several times a year and of sediment annually. In the winter of 1987, after heavy rain, a blocked drain resulted in rain water flowing into the lagoon. A fissure developed at the top of one side of the lagoon and polluting liquid escaped, finding its way into a stream and eventually into a river. The magistrates found that the overflow from the lagoon was caused by an act of God – the ingress of rainwater – and that it was unnecessary to consider whether the respondents were negligent either in not inspecting the drain or discovering the overflow promptly enough or in not providing an adequate drain. They further found that the blocked drain causing the ingress of rainwater was an intervening event ‘breaking the chain of causation’. They dismissed the information and the prosecutor appealed by way of case stated. Held, allowing the appeal and remitting the case with a direction to convict, the following principles applied: (1) where the defendant conducts some active operation involving the storage, use or creation of material capable of polluting a river should it escape, then if it does escape and pollute, the defendant is liable if he ‘caused’ that escape; (2) the question of causation is to be decided in a common sense way; (3) a defendant may be found to have caused that escape even though he did not intend that escape and even though the escape happened without his negligence; (4) it is a defence to show that the cause of the escape was the intervening act of a third party or act of God or vis major which are the novus actus interveniens defences to strict civil liability referred to in Rylands v Fletcher (1868) LR 3 HL 330; (5) in deciding whether the intervening cause affords a defence the test is whether it was of so powerful nature that the conduct of the defendant was not a cause at all, but was merely part of the surrounding circumstances. On the facts of the present case, the active operations or positive acts of the respondents were the storage and re-use of the effluent which resulted in the formation of the toxic sediment which polluted the stream. The magistrates erred in finding that the ingress of rainwater was an act of God; an act of God is an operation of natural forces so unpredictable as to excuse a defendant all liability for its consequences. The quantity of rain could not properly be regarded in itself as an act of God and in any event the ingress of rainwater into the lagoon was the result of the overflow from the blocked drain. Although unpredictable and unforeseeable operation of animate forces can amount to an act of God (see Carstairs v Taylor (1870) LR 6 Exch 217), there was no factual basis for such finding in the present case. The respondents submitted that the blocked drain was an effective intervening cause relegating the respondent’s effluent operation to a mere surrounding circumstance; it was sought to distinguish Alphacell Ltd v Woodward [1972] AC 824 on the basis that in." In Sourcebook Criminal Law, 143. Routledge-Cavendish, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781843143093-71.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Third Party Inspection"
Zhang, Yan, Xiangpeng Zeng, Hongyang Li, and Yousong Wang. "Establishing a Third-Party Inspection System of Construction Work Safety." In International Conference on Construction and Real Estate Management 2019. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/9780784482308.098.
Full textZhang, Yu, and Yingxue Zhao. "Analysis of the third party inspection strategy under asymmetric quality cost information." In 2012 International Conference on Systems and Informatics (ICSAI). IEEE, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icsai.2012.6223268.
Full textMontemurro, David, Kim McCaig, Richard Hoffmann, and Reena Sahney. "Capturing Best Practices for Third Party Inspections of Pipeline Construction." In 2016 11th International Pipeline Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/ipc2016-64116.
Full textDhamija, Lalit K. "Ensuring Materials Procurement Quality through Third Party Inspection and Materials Certification - The ADCO way." In Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/36254-ms.
Full textZhang, Lei, Hongyang Li, Yin Wu, Yousong Wang, Gui Xiong, and Hui Yan. "A Study on the Management Mechanism of Third-Party Safety Inspection within the Chinese Context." In International Conference on Construction and Real Estate Management 2019. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/9780784482308.051.
Full textSaito, Shinobu, Mutsuki Takeuchi, Masatoshi Hiraoka, Tsuyoshi Kitani, and Mikio Aoyama. "Requirements clinic: Third party inspection methodology and practice for improving the quality of software requirements specifications." In 2013 IEEE 21st International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE). IEEE, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/re.2013.6636732.
Full textJohnston, Dennis C., and Stephen S. Thomas. "Colonial’s Experience With Finding Longitudinal Defects With Internal Inspection Devices." In 1996 1st International Pipeline Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/ipc1996-1842.
Full textBoszczowski, Eduardo Bomfim, Carlos Renato Aragonez de Vasconcellos, Kleber Vini´cius da Cruz, Ozias Pereira Filho, and Sarah Marcela C. Cartagena. "Best Practices for Third Party Pipeline Damage Risk Management With Social and Environment Responsibility: Transpetro—Petrobras Transporte S.A." In 2008 7th International Pipeline Conference. ASMEDC, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/ipc2008-64595.
Full textFinley, Daniel, Simon Daniel, and Paul Ogden. "Pipeline Depth of Cover: Can You Demonstrate Compliance?" In 2020 13th International Pipeline Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/ipc2020-9426.
Full textJäger, Wolfram. "Qualifications and Internal Checks versus Independent Proof of Structural Design." In IABSE Workshop, Helsinki 2017: Ignorance, Uncertainty, and Human Errors in Structural Engineering. Zurich, Switzerland: International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE), 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.2749/helsinki.2017.059.
Full text