Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Tjalling Koopmans / Journal articles

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Tjalling Koopmans.

Journal articles on the topic 'Tjalling Koopmans'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 5 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 26 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Tjalling Koopmans.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Spear, Stephen E., and Warren Young. "OPTIMUM SAVINGS AND OPTIMAL GROWTH: THE CASS–MALINVAUD–KOOPMANS NEXUS." Macroeconomic Dynamics 18, no. 1 (July 25, 2013): 215–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1365100513000291.

Full text

Abstract:

This paper surveys the contributions of David Cass, Tjalling Koopmans, and Edmond Malinvaud over the decades during which modern optimal growth theory was developed. By utilizing material ranging from dissertations, drafts, and working papers through conference presentations, discussions, and published papers, we show that both Malinvaud and Cass had significant impacts on the evolution of Koopman's thought, and the development of his part of what is known as “the Cass–Koopmans model.” Based on our findings, we conclude that the modern optimal growth model should include the contributions of Malinvaud, and be retitled “the Cass–Malinvaud–Koopmans” model accordingly.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Phillips, Peter C. B. "THE TJALLING C. KOOPMANS ECONOMETRIC THEORY PRIZE: 1994–1996." Econometric Theory 14, no. 6 (December 1998): 699. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0266466698146078.

Full text

Abstract:

Econometric Theory is proud to announce the winning article for the Tjalling C. Koopmans Econometric Theory Prize over the period 1994–1996 (inclusive). The prize is jointly supported by the publishers, Cambridge University Press, and Mrs. Truus Koopmans. It is named in honor of Tjalling C. Koopmans, the 1975 Nobel Laureate in Economic Science. The selection of the winning article was made by the Advisory Board of the Journal, and all articles published in Econometric Theory (1994–1996) were candidates for the prize, except those that were authored or coauthored by the Editor and members of the Advisory Board. The prize is accompanied by a financial award of $500 to each of the winning authors.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Arrow, Kenneth J., George B. Dantzig, and Alan Manne. "In memory of Tjalling C. Koopmans." Mathematical Programming 32, no. 2 (June 1985): 123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01586086.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Assaf, Matheus, and Pedro Garcia Duarte. "Utility Matters." History of Political Economy 52, no. 5 (October 1, 2020): 863–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-8671855.

Full text

Abstract:

The present-day standard textbook narrative on the history of growth theory usually takes Robert Solow’s 1956 contribution as a key starting point, which was extended by David Cass and Tjalling Koopmans in 1965 by introducing an intertemporal maximization problem that defines the saving ratio in the economy. However, the road connecting Solow to the Ramsey-Cass-Koopmans model is not so straightforward. We argue that in order to understand Koopmans’s contribution, we have to go to the activity analysis literature that started before Solow 1956 and never had him as a central reference. We stress the role played by Edmond Malinvaud, with whom Koopmans interacted closely, and take his travel from the French milieu of mathematical economics to the Cowles Commission in 1950-51 and back to France as a guiding line. The rise of turnpike theory in the end of the 1950s generated a debate on the choice criteria of growth programs, opposing the productive efficiency typical of these models to the utilitarian approach supported by Malinvaud and Koopmans. The Vatican Conference of 1963, where Koopmans presented a first version of his 1965 model, was embedded in this debate. We argue that Malinvaud’s (and Koopmans’s) contributions were crucial to steer the activity analysis literature toward a utilitarian analysis of growth paths.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Phillips, Peter C. B. "The Tjalling C. Koopmans Econometric Theory Prize." Econometric Theory 6, no. 2 (June 1990): i. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0266466600005077.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Hahn, Frank H., and Tjalling C. Koopmans. "Scientific Papers of Tjalling C. Koopmans. Vol. II." Economic Journal 97, no. 387 (September 1987): 766. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2232946.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Phillips, Peter C. B. "TJALLING C. KOOPMANS ECONOMETRIC THEORY PRIZE 2015–2017." Econometric Theory 34, no. 4 (June 18, 2018): 947–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0266466618000208.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Phillips, Peter C. B. "TJALLING C. KOOPMANS ECONOMETRIC THEORY PRIZE 2018 – 2020." Econometric Theory 37, no. 4 (August 2021): 849–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0266466621000414.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Monfort, Alain. "A Reappraisal of Misspecified Econometric Models." Econometric Theory 12, no. 4 (October 1996): 597–619. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0266466600006952.

Full text

Abstract:

This paper is the text of the 1994 Tjalling Koopmans Lecture of the Cowles Foundation. The aim of this lecture was to survey the roles of misspecified models in econometrics. Through 10 stories we show how the misspecifipation problems can be dealt with and how misspecified models can play a positive role in inference processes.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Düppe, Till. "KOOPMANS IN THE SOVIET UNION: A TRAVEL REPORT OF THE SUMMER OF 1965." Journal of the History of Economic Thought 38, no. 1 (February 16, 2016): 81–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1053837215000772.

Full text

Abstract:

Tjalling C. Koopmans, research director of the Cowles Foundation of Research in Economics, was the first US economist after World War II who, in the summer of 1965, travelled to the Soviet Union for an official visit to the Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Koopmans left hoping to learn from the Soviet economists’ experience with applying linear programming to economic planning. Would his own theories, as discovered independently by Leonid V. Kantorovich, help increase allocative efficiency in a socialist economy? Inspired by a vague notion of universal reason spanning the iron curtain, Koopmans may have even envisioned a research community that transcends the political divide. Yet, he came home having discovered that learning about Soviet mathematical economists might be more interesting than learning from them. On top of that, he found the Soviet scene caught in the same deplorable situation he knew all too well from home: that mathematicians are the better economists. Reconstructing Koopmans’s voyage from a first-person perspective puts the spirit of universal economic knowledge at Cowles to test: Is it capable of establishing a dialogue across the political divide of the Cold War or is it limited to the Western academic cocoon?

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Phillips, Peter C. B. "THE 2009–2011 TJALLING C. KOOPMANS ECONOMETRIC THEORY PRIZE." Econometric Theory 28, no. 4 (May 29, 2012): 933–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s026646661200031x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Houthakker, Hendrik S. "Toward a New Iron Age? Quantitative Modeling of Resource Exhaustion.Robert B. Gordon , Tjalling C. Koopmans , William D. Nordhaus , Brian J. Skinner." Journal of Political Economy 98, no. 2 (April 1990): 440–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/261688.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Bockman, Johanna, and Michael A. Bernstein. "Scientific Community in a Divided World: Economists, Planning, and Research Priority during the Cold War." Comparative Studies in Society and History 50, no. 3 (June 25, 2008): 581–613. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0010417508000261.

Full text

Abstract:

During the Cold War, economists utilizing mathematical methods in both the Soviet Union and the United States found they shared a common research project. After the Stalinist years in which they could communicate very little, they found that they had much to learn from each other. Mathematical economics came to bridge the divide between East and West even though the meetings and collaborations between American and Soviet colleagues were fraught with tension and misunderstanding. The Cold War excitement about mathematical economics and the East-West cooperation it allowed, however, dwindled with the end of détente, the global shift in economic science away from mathematical economics, and the end of state socialism in the East Bloc. To understand the rise and fall of this cooperation and convergence, we examine the case of the connection between Tjalling C. Koopmans, a Dutch economist living in the United States as a result of World War II, and Leonid V. Kantorovich, a Russian scientist living in the Soviet Union. These two men jointly won the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Science in 1975. Their scientific connections reflect the broader experiences of East-West scientific collaboration during the Cold War. At the same time, they offer insights for scholars regarding struggles over scientific research priority and the potential for convergence between capitalism and socialism during the Cold War era.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Rust, John. "The Limits of Inference with Theory: A Review of Wolpin (2013)." Journal of Economic Literature 52, no. 3 (September 1, 2014): 820–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jel.52.3.820.

Full text

Abstract:

This essay reviews Kenneth I. Wolpin's (2013) monograph The Limits of Inference without Theory, which arose from lectures he presented at the Cowles Foundation in 2010 in honor of Tjalling Koopmans. While I readily agree with Wolpin's basic premise that empirical work that eschews the role of economic theory faces unnecessary self-imposed limits relative to empirical work that embraces and tries to test and improve economic theory, it is important to be aware that the use of economic theory is not a panacea. I point out that there are also serious limits to inference with theory: 1) there may be no truly “structural” (policy invariant) parameters, a key assumption underpinning the structural econometric approach that Wolpin and the Cowles Foundation have championed; 2) there is a curse of dimensionality that makes it very difficult for us to elucidate the detailed implications of economic theories, which is necessary to empirically implement and test these theories; 3) there is an identification problem that makes it impossible to decide between competing theories without imposing ad hoc auxiliary assumptions (such as parametric functional form assumptions); and 4) there is a problem of multiplicity and indeterminacy of equilibria that limits the predictive empirical content of many economic theories. I conclude that though these are very challenging problems, I agree with Wolpin and the Cowles Foundation that economists have far more to gain by trying to incorporate economic theory into empirical work and test and improve our theories than by rejecting theory and presuming that all interesting economic issues can be answered by well-designed controlled, randomized experiments and assuming that difficult questions of causality and evaluation of alternative hypothetical policies can be resolved by simply allowing the “data to speak for itself.” (JEL B41, C18)

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

"Tjalling Koopmans." Physics Today, August 28, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/pt.5.031039.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

"Two Photographs of Tjalling C. Koopmans." Econometric Theory 8, no. 01 (March 1992): 133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0266466600010793.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

"TJALLING C. KOOPMANS ECONOMETRIC THEORY PRIZE 2012–2014." Econometric Theory 31, no. 3 (May 20, 2015): 668–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0266466615000122.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Phillips, Peter C. B. "THE 2000–2002 TJALLING C. KOOPMANS ECONOMETRIC THEORY PRIZE." Econometric Theory 19, no. 06 (September 24, 2003). http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0266466603196168.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Phillips, Peter C. B. "THE 2003–2005 TJALLING C. KOOPMANS ECONOMETRIC THEORY PRIZE." Econometric Theory 22, no. 04 (May 23, 2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0266466606060488.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

"THE 2006–2008 TJALLING C. KOOPMANS ECONOMETRIC THEORY PRIZE." Econometric Theory 25, no. 5 (October 2009): 1447–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0266466609990028.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

"The Tjalling C. Koopmans Econometric Theory Prize: 1991–1993." Econometric Theory 13, no. 1 (February 1997): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0266466600005600.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

"The Tjalling C. Koopmans Econometric Theory Prize: 1988–1990." Econometric Theory 8, no. 3 (September 1992): i. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0266466600012949.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

"Winners of the 1996 Tjalling C. Koopmans Econometric Theory Prize." Econometric Theory 13, no. 1 (February 1997): 143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0266466600005685.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

"Winners of the 1990 Tjalling C. Koopmans Econometric Theory Prize." Econometric Theory 9, no. 1 (January 1993): 115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0266466600007362.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

"Winners of the 1992 Tjalling C. Koopmans Econometric Theory Prize." Econometric Theory 9, no. 1 (January 1993): 116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0266466600007374.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Fisher, William P. "Separation Theorems in Econometrics and Psychometrics: Rasch, Frisch, Two Fishers and Implications for Measurement." Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, August 23, 2021, 026010792110334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02601079211033475.

Full text

Abstract:

In 1959, Ragnar Frisch prompted Georg Rasch to formalise a separability theorem that continues today to serve as the basis of a wide range of theoretical and applied developments in psychological and social measurement. Previously unnoted are the influences on Rasch exerted by Frisch’s concerns for data autonomy, model identification and necessary and sufficient conditions. Although Rasch acknowledged Frisch’s prompting towards a separability theorem, he did not acknowledge any substantive, intellectual debt to him, nor to Irving Fisher, but only to Ronald Fisher. Rasch appears to have developed a special interest in sufficiency and identified models when studying with Frisch in 1935, and in 1947, when Rasch accompanied Tjalling Koopmans to the University of Chicago and the Cowles Commission for Research in Economics. I. Fisher’s separation theorem continues to be relevant in econometrics, and interest in Rasch’s separability theorem is growing as the measurement models based on it are adopted in metrological theory and practice. The extensive interrelations between measurement science, metrological standards and economics suggest paths towards lower transaction costs and more efficient markets for individualised exchanges of human, social and natural capital. Equally, if not more, surprising are the implications for a poetic art of complex, harmonised relationships played out via creative improvisations expressed using instruments tuned to shared scales. JEL: B41, C10, C13, C20, C42, D70, E60, H54, I11, I21, I31, P11

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!