Academic literature on the topic 'Tlatelolco, Massacre de (1968)'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Tlatelolco, Massacre de (1968).'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Tlatelolco, Massacre de (1968)"
1
Sorensen, Diana. "Tlatelolco 1968: Paz and Poniatowska on Law and Violence." Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos 18, no. 2 (2002): 297–321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/msem.2002.18.2.297.
Full textAbstract:
Examination of two texts generated by the student massacre at the Plaza de Tlatelolco in 1968: Postdata by Octavio Paz, and La noche de Tlatelolco by Elena Poniatowska. Paz's totalizing vision interprets the events as providing answers to the questions about the nation posed in El laberinto de la soledad, and he insists on the need to rewrite Mexico's history under the aegis of a new genealogy. Poniatowska's book, instead, is ruled by fragmentation and plurality, to convey the often dissonant voices of civil society. The analysis scrutinizes literary form as it is made to represent relations between violence, justice and aesthetics. Examen de dos textos generados por la masacre estudiantil de la Plaza de Tlatelolco en 1968: Postdata de Octavio Paz y La noche de Tlatelolco de Elena Ponioatowska. La visióón totalizadora de Paz interpreta el evento como proveedor de respuestas a las cuestiones planteadas acerca de la nacióón en El laberinto de la soledad, e insiste en la necesidad de reescribir la historia de Mééxico bajo el eje de una nueva genealogíía. El libro de Poniatowska, en cambio, se rige por la fragmentacióón y la pluralidad, para transmitir las frecuentes voces disonantes de la sociedad civil. El anáálisis examina los modos en que la forma literaria representa relaciones entre la violencia, la justicia y la estéética.
2
Bixler, Jacqueline E. "Re-Membering the Past: Memory-Theatre and Tlatelolco." Latin American Research Review 37, no. 2 (2002): 119–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0023879100019543.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractThis study discusses the responses of Mexican intellectuals to the 1968 massacre in the Plaza de Tlatelolco. Several published studies and anthologies have covered the poetry, narrative, and essays written on the subject, but no such consideration has been given to the theatrical works written and staged since 1968. Jeanette Malkin's theory on memory-theatre, Pierre Nora's “lieux de mémoire,” and Michel Foucault's concept of countermemories all shed light on how these dramatic works function in a changing Mexico, now moving toward authentic democracy and ready to revive a segment of history suppressed and distorted but never forgotten. Of the many plays commemorating the events of 1968, four that focus on the process of memory are analyzed in this essay. Because of the slow democratization of Mexico, the growing maturity of former participants and witnesses, and the postmodern craving for testimony, the repressed memories of Tlatelolco have not faded into oblivion but continue to inspire the dramatic imagination.
3
Young, Dolly J. "Mexican Literary Reactions to Tlatelolco 1968." Latin American Research Review 20, no. 2 (1985): 71–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s002387910003449x.
Full textAbstract:
In Mexican colonial history, the night the Aztecs of Tenochtitlán massacred Cortés's troops, 30 June 1520, is known as la noche triste. In Mexican contemporary history, the night of 2 October 1968 is known as la nueva noche triste, a night that saw the deaths of numerous student protesters in the Plaza de las Tres Culturas (Tlatelolco) in Mexico City. It is also referred to as la noche de Tlatelolco or merely as Tlatelolco '68. Some writers contend that the events at Tlatelolco and the emergence of the student movement of 1968 leading to the confrontation are among the most important occurrences in Mexico since the revolution and that Mexico is profoundly different today because of them. It is therefore not surprising that a significant portion of the Mexican literature written since 1968 reflects in various ways the impact of these events on the Mexican national consciousness. A variety of texts, both fictional and nonfictional, appeared immediately after the incident, and others have continued to appear in contemporary Mexican literature in the ensuing years. These texts either address or refer to the dramatic occurences in the Plaza de las Tres Culturas and are collectively known as “Tlatelolco literature.”
4
Bixler, Jacqueline E. "Performing Tlatelolco and the Past That Never Dies: Auxilio: Au secours and El pasado nunca se muere, ni siquiera es pasado." TDR/The Drama Review 64, no. 4 (December 2020): 108–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/dram_a_00967.
Full textAbstract:
The 50th commemoration of the 2 October 1968 massacre of students and bystanders in the Plaza de Tlatelolco included performances that forced spectators to confront the nagging legacy of 1968 and to think collectively about what a future Mexico could look like if nothing is done to change the course of its history. Auxilio: Au secours by TeatroSinParedes and El pasado nunca se muere by Lagartijas Tiradas al Sol share a mix of genres, a tripartite structure, and spatiotemporal dislocations that oblige the audience to leave their seats, to connect the dots, and, ultimately, to determine for themselves the meaning of each work.
5
Izaguirre, José G. "Reckoning with Tlatelolco: Arturo Rosenblueth and a Cybernetic Rhetoric." Rhetoric and Public Affairs 25, no. 2 (June 1, 2022): 57–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.25.2.0057.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract This essay examines the cybernetic rhetoric of Dr. Arturo Rosenblueth, a cybernetician and prominent Mexican intellectual. Published in a journal reaffirming Mexico's political image in the aftermath of the Tlatelolco Massacre in 1968, his essay offered a counter to one of the government's rationales for the violence enacted against the movimiento estudiantil at Tlatelolco—the influence of el extranjero. Rosenblueth's essay evinced a mediating path between complete disavowal of Mexico's statist tendencies and support for the Mexican state in post-Tlatelolco Mexico. Yet, in invoking cybernetics as a rhetoric for public intervention in this moment of crisis, I argue that Rosenblueth's use of cybernetics both empowered his proposals calling for an adjustment to perceptions of el extranjero and supported the survival of a strong Mexican state enacting violence against it. I conclude from my reading of Rosenblueth's essay that the political possibilities of cybernetic rhetoric lie not only on the cybernetician's ideological commitments or political context(s) but by a plasticity constitutive of cybernetics.
6
KENNY, IVAN. "The Right to Tlatelolco: Space, State and Home in Rojo amanecer (1989), Directed by Jorge Fons." Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 97, no. 10 (November 1, 2020): 1113–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.3828/bhs.2020.62.
Full textAbstract:
This article addresses the issue of spatiality in the Mexican film Rojo amanecer (Jorge Fons, 1989), which dramatizes the events surrounding the massacre of student demonstrators in the plaza de Tlatelolco, Mexico City, on 2nd October 1968. The film has received a good deal of critical attention and yet a detailed analysis of its rendering of narrative space remains to be done. With reference to the spatial theories of Henri Lefebvre and Gaston Bachelard, I argue that the film’s innovative use of narrative space establishes a symbolic connection between the events in the public space of the Plaza de las Tres Culturas and the intimate space of the Mexican family home. The harrowing depiction of an invasion of state power into the space of the home serves to critique the Partido Revolutionario Institutional (PRI) regime’s core ideology and its modernist housing project in Tlatelolco.
7
Mejia, Tania Bañuelos. "The Tlatelolco Massacre, Mexico 1968, And The Emotional Triangle of Anger, Grief and Shame." Journal of Iberian and Latin American Research 24, no. 3 (September 2, 2018): 289–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13260219.2018.1625181.
Full text
8
Braun, Herbert. "Protests of Engagement: Dignity, False Love, and Self-Love in Mexico during 1968." Comparative Studies in Society and History 39, no. 3 (July 1997): 511–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0010417500020740.
Full textAbstract:
A few thousand young Mexicans were standing together in large groups in the Plaza de las Tres Culturas at Tlatelolco in downtown Mexico City to remember the massacre which had brought the student movement of 1968 to a sudden end ten years before. Many turned their heads upward to the balcony of a residential building that faced the plaza to hear Carlos Monsiváis, a well-known intellectual who had savored the protests, tell them that they “no longer saw the state as a tyrannical and omnipresent father.” Still another ten years later, many of them, and others as well, read the words of Hugo Hiriart, a promising young journalist in 1968, who claimed that the students had “dared to lead in a frontal and uncompromising opposition to the paternal and authoritarian Mexican state.”
9
Perutka, Lukáš, and Luz Araceli González Uresti. "La masacre de Tlatelolco y los gobiernos de los Estados Unidos de América y de Gran Bretaña." IBERO-AMERICANA PRAGENSIA 48, no. 2 (August 2, 2022): 55–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/24647063.2022.4.
Full textAbstract:
The presented article analyzes the international dimension of the so-called Tlatelolco massacre of 1968. It focuses on the diplomatic reaction of two of Mexico’s neighbors, the United States of America and the United Kingdom that still held its colony of British Honduras. This topic has been neglected by historiography so far. It is based on the archival resources from British National Archives in Kew and online declassified American documents available thanks to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The reaction of both governments was minimal and relatively calm because they understood the massacre did not endanger their strong ally Gustavo Díaz Ordaz and the students’ protests were not anti-American nor anti-British. Similarly, there was a vague connection to the international communist movement, and no countries from the communist camp were directly involved. The only difference we could find was in the evaluation of the massacre. The British saw it as an opportunity for further democratization of Mexico, i.e., they took a more normative stance. The Americans approached the situation more pragmatically. They were supportive of the undemocratic regime as long as it took an anti-communist stance.
10
Troncoso, Alberto del Castillo. "Memória e representações: a fotografia e o movimento estudantil de 1968 no México." Revista Brasileira de História 33, no. 65 (2013): 85–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0102-01882013000100004.
Full textAbstract:
A história recente do movimento estudantil de 1968 no México indica que esse acontecimento tem um peso fundamental para o entendimento das atuais condições políticas do país. O artigo analisa as complexas relações entre a imprensa e o poder político da época e apresenta exemplos relevantes em torno do papel estratégico desempenhado pela fotografia na cobertura de alguns dos episódios mais significativos. Por exemplo, as multidões presentes às manifestações nas ruas, a tomada violenta das universidades por militares e o massacre da população civil em Tlatelolco por conta do Estado. Em todos esses acontecimentos houve uma disputa simbólica, entre os estudantes e o governo, pela apropriação de imagens. Depois de pouco mais de 40 anos, é possível analisar a questão e reconhecer a importância do uso político e cultural das fotografias pelos diferentes grupos.
Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Tlatelolco, Massacre de (1968)"
1
Guyomarch, Le Roux Sandrine. "Théâtre et histoire : le "teatro del 68" au Mexique et le travail de mémoire." Perpignan, 2007. http://www.theses.fr/2007PERP0783.
Full textAbstract:
Le Mexique a été, en 1968, la scène d’un conflit étudiant d’une violence insolite, qui s’est terminé dans un bain de sang, appelé « massacre de Tlatelolco. » Face à la censure officielle, des intellectuels et artistes mexicains ont assuré la transmission de la mémoire de ces événements. A l’heure où cette histoire alternative demande à être officiellement reconnue, la contribution des dramaturges mexicains à ce travail de mémoire continue, quant à elle, à être ignorée. Le recensement effectué, dans le cadre de ce travail, entre 1968 et 2003, permet pourtant d’établir que la production dramaturgique sur le mouvement étudiant mexicain de 1968 est très vaste. Montées principalement, dans les milieux étudiant et indépendant, ces pièces sont, en outre, une manifestation vivante du travail de mémoire sur 68. L’analyse de l’articulation entre histoire et théâtre met en évidence l’existence de cinq catégories distinctes, au sein de pièces que le dramaturge Felipe Galván a rassemblées sous l’étiquette Teatro del 68. La nature protéiforme de ce phénomène appelle d’autres commentaires, concernant sa cohérence, sa définition générique, et la légitimité de la dénomination « Teatro del 68 ». Une analyse plus précise de trois pièces montre, enfin, que les ressources propres au théâtre pour s’emparer d’un référent historique problématique, lui permet de jouer un rôle essentiel dans la problématique mémorielle actuelle sur 68. Ce travail espère, ainsi, contribuer à faire connaître un phénomène qui demeure absent du panorama du théâtre mexicain contemporainMexico was, in 1968, the scene of a surprisingly violent student conflict, which finished in a repression called “Tlatelolco massacre. ” Some intelectuals and artists tried to transmit the memory of these events, silent by official story. Today, even if this “other” story pretends to get a place in official one, the mexican players’ tribute to this memory remains unknow. Whereas the proportions of the dramatic production on the 1968’s mexican student strike, between 1968 and 2003, is worth to being considered, and its manifestations obviously demonstrate its own way of enriching the work of memory on the events of 68, this production remains completely absent in mexican theatre’s today’s story. The analisis shows that five different articulations between story and theatre are posible in this production called Teatro del 68, by the player Felipe Galván. These different ways of focusing the facts make the question of its definition problematic. A focus on three of the plays enhances the proper hability of theatre to catch a problematic referent, and to enable the memory process to be activated. The purpose of this work is, thus, to make it known and permit its evaluation
2
Rosa, Sandra. "Hacer memoria, hacer resistencia. : Un análisis de la representación de la memoria individual y colectiva en Amuleto (1999) de Roberto Bolaño." Thesis, Stockholms universitet, Institutionen för spanska, portugisiska och latinamerikastudier, 2013. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-95565.
Full textAbstract:
En este trabajo vamos a analizar la representación de la memoria, individual y colectiva, en la novela Amuleto (1999) del novelista y poeta chileno Roberto Bolaño, con la finalidad de mostrar la importancia de la memoria para la construcción de la novela. La investigación está dividida principalmente en dos apartados: un análisis narratológico y un análisis sobre teorías de la memoria. En la primera parte del análisis se colocarán los diferentes actantes en un esquema actancial para evidenciar sus respectivas funciones e importancia dentro del texto. En la segunda parte se analizarán más en profundidad algunos apartados de la novela a partir del esquema actancial, con la ayuda principalmente, de las teorías e ideas sobre la memoria de Maurice Halbwachs, Paul Ricoeur y Márcio Seligmann-Silva. Hemos llegado a la conclusión de que Auxilio, la protagonista de la novela, construye, con la ayuda de su memoria individual, una representación histórica de México de los años sesenta y setenta. A partir de ello, la novela de Bolaño se presenta como una narración importante, puesto que está en contraste con otras versiones de un hito en la historia mexicana.In this paper we will analyse the representation of memory, individual and collective in the novel Amuleto (1999) by Chilean novelist and poet Roberto Bolaño, with the intention of showing the importance of memory for the construction of the novel. The investigation is primarily divided into two parts: a narratological analysis and an analysis of theories regarding memory. In the first part the different actants will be placed in an actancial model to evidence their function and importance in the text. In the second part we will do an in-depth analyses of some passages of the novel, according to the actancial model with the help of theories on memory presented by among others Maurice Halbwachs, Paul Ricoeur, Márcio Seligmann-Silva and Héctor Schmucler. We have come to the conclusion that Auxilio, the protagonist of the novel, constructs a representation of the history of Mexico in the sixties and the seventies. Accordingly, the novel by Bolaño is an important narration seeing that it represents a contrast to other versions of a milestone in Mexican history.
3
Sisson, Timothy Wallace Patricia Ward. "Uncovered the cover-up of the My Lai massacre /." Waco, Tex. : Baylor University, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/2104/5278.
Full text
4
Mallea, Rodrigo. "A questão nuclear na relação argentino-brasileira (1968-1984)." Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, 2012. http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=6312.
Full textAbstract:
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorEste trabalho visa explorar a dinâmica da relação nuclear entre Argentina e o Brasil ao longo do período 1968-1984. Em particular, ele procura analisar a interação de duas dimensões desta relação. A primeira, de ordem bilateral, centra-se no estudo da rivalidade argentino-brasileira e procura medir o seu impacto tanto nas decisões nucleares de cada país como nas tentativas de estabelecer um acordo de cooperação nesta área. A segunda dimensão, de ordem internacional, analisa o impacto que teve sobre o relacionamento argentino-brasileiro a coincidente postura de ambos os países frente o regime de não proliferação nuclear (Tlatelolco e TNP) e a pressão internacional que ambos tiveram que suportar sobre os seus programas nucleares. Com esse objetivo, o trabalho se concentra em uma abordagem histórica guiada por fontes primárias (pesquisa de arquivo e entrevistas pessoais) com o objeto de reconstruir a narrativa histórica e contribuir a novas interpretações sobre o relacionamento argentino-brasileiro no período em questão em base à nova evidencia apresentada. São apresentadas quatro conclusões centrais: (1) mesmo sob uma situação de competição regional e crescente disputa geopolítica na Bacia da Prata, não houve uma corrida armamentista para a obtenção da bomba devido à natureza da rivalidade argentino-brasileira; (2) em todo momento os dois países têm incentivos para cooperar no campo nuclear por causa da sua visão compartilhada respeito à ordem nuclear global e a falta de informação perfeita sobre as atividades nucleares do outro país; (3) a dinâmica da rivalidade regional argentino-brasileira é fundamental para explicar por que, apesar de numerosas tentativas de cooperação nuclear de ambos os lados, escolhem uma lógica de não-cooperação entre as décadas de 1960 e 1970, e posteriormente, passam a uma de cooperação no começo de 1980 (4) a democratização como variável central para explicar o rapprochement nuclear teve um papel menor do que a literatura sugere.
El presente trabajo tiene como objeto explorar la dinámica de la relación nuclear argentino-brasileña entre 1968-1984. En particular, se propone estudiar la interacción de dos dimensiones de esta relación. La primera, de orden bilateral, se centra en un análisis de la rivalidad regional argentino-brasileña con el fin de medir en qué grado ello se trasladó al campo nuclear y qué efectos tuvo sobre las tentativas de alcanzar un acuerdo en dicha área. La segunda, de orden internacional, analiza el impacto que tuvo sobre la relación bilateral argentino-brasileña la coincidente postura de ambos países frente al régimen de no proliferación nuclear (Tlatelolco y TNP) y la presión internacional que ambos debieron soportar sobre sus programas nucleares. Para ello, el trabajo propone una investigación histórica guiada por fuentes primarias (investigación de archivo y entrevistas personales) con el fin de reconstruir la narrativa existente y contribuir a nuevas interpretaciones sobre la relación argentino-brasileña en dicho período. Se presentan cuatro conclusiones centrales: (1) aún en un contexto de competencia regional signado por la creciente disputa geopolítica en la Cuenca del Plata, no existió una carrera armamentista por la bomba debido a la naturaleza de la rivalidad argentino-brasileña; (2) en todo momento ambos países tienen incentivos para cooperar en el campo nuclear por causa de su visión compartida frente al orden nuclear internacional y la falta de información perfecta sobre las actividades nucleares del otro país; (3) la rivalidad regional es central para explicar por qué, a pesar de numerosas tentativas de cooperación nuclear de ambos lados, se pasa de una lógica de nocooperación entre las décadas de 1960 y 1970 a una de cooperación en el comienzo de 1980 y (4) la democratización como principal variable para explicar el rapprochement nuclear argentino-brasileño tiene un rol menor del que sugiere la literatura.
5
Crane, Nicholas Jon. "Between Repression and Heroism: Young People's Politics in Mexico City After 1968." The Ohio State University, 2014. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1403108272.
Full text
6
Estévez, Ayala Dulce María. "Causas, desarrollo y consecuencias del movimiento estudiantil de 1968 en la obra La estela de Tlatelolco: una reconstrucción histórica del movimiento estudiantil del 68, de Raúl Álvarez Garín." Tesis de Licenciatura, UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DEL ESTADO DE MÉXICO, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11799/67357.
Full text
7
Vlach, Tomáš. "1968: Masakr v Tlatelolco pohledem zpravodajských služeb a diplomatické mise Spojených států amerických v Mexiku." Master's thesis, 2017. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-370057.
Full textAbstract:
(in English): This diploma thesis deals with events related to student protests in 1968 in Mexico during which occurred a violent suppression of demonstrations against a rigid political system controlled by the PRI for several decades. This diploma thesis describes the course of the demonstrations from June to October 1968, using declassified diplomatic notes and intelligence prepared by relevant bureaus of the United States of America operating in Mexico as a source. The well-known and mapped events of student protests in Mexico in 1968 which escalated with the bloodshed in the square in Tlateloclo, Mexico, D.F., where soldiers and policemen interfered with protestors, are examined in the perspective of American diplomats and intelligence officers.
8
Thivierge, Paule. "La historia carnavalesca del 68 en Palinuro de México de Fernando del Paso." Thèse, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/1866/3564.
Full textAbstract:
Résumé
Ce travail cherche à révéler les stratégies utilisées dans Palinuro de México (1977) de Fernando del Paso pour représenter l’histoire du mouvement étudiant de 1968, qui se termina par le massacre de Tlatelolco. Afin de protéger son image, le gouvernement censura cet événement, qui compte parmi les plus marquants de l’histoire contemporaine du Mexique.
Nous situons Palinuro de México dans un corpus littéraire qui résiste au silence imposé par les autorités avec la création d’une poétique capable de raconter l’histoire et de dénoncer la censure. Notre hypothèse s’appuie sur les réflexions de Paul Veyne et Jacques Rancière, qui démontrent que l’écriture de l’histoire ne possède pas de méthode scientifique, mais procède plutôt d’une construction littéraire. Cela nous permet d’affirmer que l’histoire, puisqu’elle relève de la littérature, peut aussi être racontée dans un roman.
La théorie de la littérature carnavalesque de Mijail Bajtin, qui se caractérise par le rire, la liberté d’expression et l’opposition aux règles officielles, nous sert à identifier les procédés utilisés dans Palinuro de México pour créer une mémoire de Tlatelolco. Ce style rappelle la vitalité du mouvement étudiant, en soulignant la joyeuse subversion des valeurs. De plus, son caractère polyphonique permet d’inclure une pièce de théâtre dans un roman et de confronter les différentes idéologies qui s’opposaient durant le conflit.Summary This work aims to reveal the strategies used in Fernando del Paso’s Palinuro de México (1977) to represent the history of the 1968 student movement, which ended with the massacre of Tlatelolco. In order to protect its image, the government censored this event, among the most significant of Mexico’s contemporary history. We approach Palinuro de México as part of a literary corpus that resists the silence imposed by the authorities with the creation of a poetics capable of recounting the student movement’s history and denouncing the regime’s censorship. Our working hypothesis borrows from research by Paul Veyne and Jacques Rancière, who demonstrate that the writing of history does not possess a scientific method, but is instead a form of literary construction. It allows us to assert that history, because it uses literature, can also be told in a novel. Mijail Bajtin’s theory of the carnavalesque, which is characterized by its humour, liberty of expression, and opposition to official rules, allows us to identify the literary processes used in Palinuro de México to create a memory of Tlatelolco. This style recalls the vitality of the student movement by underlining their merry, non-violent subversion of values. Its polyphonic element also allows the author to include a theatrical play within the novel and to represent the different ideologies opposed during the conflict.
Sumario Este estudio busca revelar las estrategias utilizadas en Palinuro de México (1977) de Fernando del Paso para representar la historia del movimiento estudiantil de 1968, que terminó con la masacre de Tlatelolco. Para proteger su imagen, el gobierno censuró este acontecimiento, que cuenta dentro de los más destacados de la historia contemporánea de México. Situamos a Palinuro de México dentro de un corpus literario que resiste al silencio impuesto por las autoridades con la creación de una poética capaz de contar esta historia y de denunciar la censura. La hipótesis que sostenemos se apoya en las reflexiones de Paul Veyne y Jacques Rancière, que demuestran que la escritura de la historia no tiene un método científico, sino que resulta de una construcción literaria. Esto nos permite afirmar que si la historia utiliza la literatura, puede también ser contada en una novela. La teoría de la literatura carnavalesca de Mijail Bajtin, que se caracteriza por la risa, la libertad de expresión y la oposición a las reglas oficiales, nos sirve para identificar los procedimientos literarios utilizados en Palinuro de México para crear una memoria de Tlatelolco. El estilo carnavalesco recuerda la vitalidad del movimiento estudiantil, subrayando la alegre subversión de los valores. Además, su carácter polifónico permite incluir una pieza de teatro en una novela y confrontar las distintas ideologías que se oponían durante el conflicto.
9
Keller, Renata Nicole. "Capitalizing on Castro : Mexico's foreign relations with Cuba and the United States, 1959-1969." Thesis, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/2152/25101.
Full textAbstract:
This dissertation explores the central paradox of Mexico's foreign relations with Cuba and the United States in the decade following the Cuban Revolution--why did a government that cooperated with the CIA and practiced conservative domestic policies defend Castro's communist regime? It uses new sources to prove that historians' previous focus on the foreign and ideological influences on Mexico's relations with Cuba was misplaced, and that the most important factor was fear of the domestic Left. It argues that Mexican leaders capitalized upon their country's "special relationship" with Castro as part of their efforts to maintain control over restive leftist sectors of the Mexican population. This project uses new sources to illuminate how perceptions of threat shaped Mexico's foreign and domestic politics. In 2002, the Mexican government declassified the records of the two most important intelligence organizations--the Department of Federal Security and the Department of Political and Social Investigations. The files contain the information that Mexico's presidents received about potential dangers to their regime. They reveal that Mexican leaders overestimated the centralization, organization, and coordination of leftist groups, and in so doing gave them more influence over policy than their actual numbers or resources logically should have afforded. The dissertation uses the concept of threat perception as an analytic and organizational tool. Each chapter considers a different potential source of danger to the Mexican regime in the context of the Cold War and the country's relations with Cuba. For the sake of clarity, it breaks the threats into the categories of individual, national, and international, even though these subjective categories may blend into one another throughout the course of the analysis. The first chapter begins with an individual threat: Lázaro Cárdenas, a powerful former president who became one of Fidel Castro's most dedicated supporters. The next three chapters analyze threats on the national level by looking at the domestic groups that Mexican leaders perceived to be the greatest dangers to their regime. The final two chapters move to the international level and examine the roles of Cuba and the United States. As a whole, this study of the connections between Mexico's foreign and domestic politics makes a significant and timely contribution to the historiographies of modern Mexico, U.S.-Latin American relations, and the Cold War.text
Books on the topic "Tlatelolco, Massacre de (1968)"
3
La noche de Tlatelolco: Testimonios de historia oral. Ciudad de México: Ediciones Era, 2014.
Find full text
4
1968: Prohibido prohibir : a 40 años del movimiento estudiantil popular. Toluca, Estado de México: Centro Toluqueño de Escritores, 2008.
Find full text
5
Poniatowska, Elena. La noche de Tlatelolco. Ciudad de México, México: Giron Books, 1999.
Find full text
6
1938-, Monsiváis Carlos, and García Barragán Marcelino, eds. Parte de guerra, Tlatelolco 1968: Documentos del general Marcelino García Barragán : los hechos y la historia. Ciudad de México, México: Nuevo Siglo/Aguilar, 1999.
Find full text
7
Montemayor, Carlos. Rehacer la historia: Análisis de los nuevos documentos del 2 de octubre de 1968 en Tlatelolco. México, D.F: Planeta, 2000.
Find full text
8
Poniatowska, Elena. La noche de Tlatelolco: Testimonios de historia oral. 4th ed. México, D.F: Ediciones Era, 1988.
Find full text
9
La noche de Tlatelolco: Testimonios de historia oral. 2nd ed. México, D.F: Ediciones Era, 1998.
Find full text
10
author, García Sánchez José, ed. La traición se volvió gobierno. México, D.F: Editora Alternativa Periodistica, 2014.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Tlatelolco, Massacre de (1968)"
1
Kriza, Elisa. "Redefining the Outsider: Anti-Communist Narratives and the Student Massacre in Tlatelolco (1968)." In The Palgrave Handbook of Anti-Communist Persecutions, 203–23. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54963-3_9.
Full text
2
Philip, George. "Díaz Ordaz and the Student Massacre at Tlatelolco." In The Presidency in Mexican Politics, 19–63. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12192-2_2.
Full text
3
Rojo, Juan J. "Introduction: Silencing the Storm—The Never-Ending Search for “Truth” After Tlatelolco." In Revisiting the Mexican Student Movement of 1968, 1–18. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55611-0_1.
Full text
4
"3. 1968—The Massacre at Tlatelolco." In The Romance of Democracy, 61–72. University of California Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/9780520936638-005.
Full text
5
Harris, Chris. "On the Commemoration of Mexico ’68: Los agachados de Rius, número especial de los cocolazos de julio-agosto-septiembre y octubre quién sabe si tambor …" In Legacies of the Past, 19–39. Edinburgh University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474480536.003.0002.
Full textAbstract:
Contemporary Mexican society is haunted by the spectres of Tlatelolco and the massacre of students on the 2nd of October that can be found in the as yet, under-explored work of comic artists. This chapter will take a key example and consider the value of comic art to communicate trauma. With an eye to the fiftieth anniversary of Tlatelolco a special edition of Los agachados from 1968, the ‘número especial de los cocolazos’, emerges as a comic by Rius with a distinctively hauntological dimension. It is a comic that must now be considered, as an integral part of the literature of Tlatelolco, and also as a site of Mexican visual culture that provides an exceptionally productive terrain for revisiting and re-thinking Derrida’s concept of ‘hauntology’. The principal critical dilemma to be addressed through the analysis of this comic concerns the idea of the text not simply as a passive ‘site of memory’ but rather as an active ‘site of memorialisation’. The comic raises key issues about the events leading up the massacre of students in 1968 and those implicated in the deaths.
6
"Eyewitness and Newspaper Accounts of the Tlatelolco Massacre (1968) *." In Mexican History, edited by Nora E. Jaffary, Edward W. Osowski, and Susie S. Porter, 389. Routledge, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429498978-78.
Full text
7
Camps, Martín. "From the Center to the Margins." In The Oxford Handbook of the Latin American Novel, C10.S1—C10.N9. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197541852.013.10.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract This chapter begins by studying Fernández de Lizardi’s (1776–1827) novel El Periquillo Sarniento (The Mangy Parrot, 1816), considered the first Mexican novel. The twentieth century opens with Santa (1903) by Federico Gamboa (1864–1939), borrowing from realist and naturalist styles. A watershed moment in the country’s history was the Mexican Revolution. Its violence and failure inspired novels by Mariano Azuela (1873–1952), among others. Two masterpieces published in 1955, Agustín Yáñez’s (1904–1980) Al filo del agua (The Edge of the Storm, 1955) and Juan Rulfo’s (1917–1986) Pedro Páramo (1955), open the era of the modern novel in Mexico. The mid-century generation modernized Mexican fiction by moving away from regional themes with works by Carlos Fuentes (1928–2012), and Elena Garro (1916–1998), among others. The 1960s in Mexico were marked by the 1968 Tlatelolco massacre, a moment of change expressed in the novels of La onda (The Wave), by José Agustín (1944) and Gustavo Sáinz (1940–2015). In the 1970s, Luis Zapata’s (1951–2020) El vampiro de la colonia Roma (Adonis García: a Picaresque Novel 1979) became a milestone in Mexican homosexual literature. In the 1980s, Fernando del Paso’s (1935–2018) Noticias del Imperio (News from the Empire, 1986) revisits the period of Emperor Maximilian in a masterful historical novel. Another important 1990s movement is the Generación del Crack (Generation of the Crack). Notwithstanding Mexico City’s magnetic pull, writers from the north of Mexico also write from or about the marginal “provinces.” The chapter closes by looking at a talented group of women writers, such as Fernanda Melchor (1982-) and Valeria Luiselli (1983).
8
Flaherty, George F. "Gestures of Hospitality." In Hotel Mexico. University of California Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520291065.003.0005.
Full textAbstract:
In Chapter 4 the unfinished mega Hotel de México (started in 1966) performs as the double to the nation-state. The hotel—archetypal building of modernity—conceals its operations and administrative apparatus, very much like the ruling PRI. By extension, the metaphor of hospitality illuminates how this self-proclaimed host treated its citizens, “limiting” or “conditioning” their status as perpetual guests. The analysis of the late major mural by the famous Mexican muralist David Alfaro Siqueiros The March of Humanity on Earth and Towards the Cosmos (1964–71), housed in the cultural center adjacent to the Hotel, reveals contradictions that parallel the challenge of reconciling the revolutionary rhetoric with capitalist modernization faced by the regime and its elites. The chapter argues that militant Siqueiros contradicted the official vision of “cosmic communion” proposed by the architect Guillermo Rossel de la Lama by crafting the mural whose story lines and gestures, especially the motif of hands, contested Mexico’s political status quo, echoing the unruliness of the 68 Movement after the Tlatelolco massacre.
9
Palacio, Raymundo Riva. "The Nightmare of Tlatelolco." In 1968, 103–9. Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315083704-15.
Full text
10
"6. An-archaeologies of 1968." In Photopoetics at Tlatelolco, 170–94. University of Texas Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.7560/305485-008.
Full text