Relevant bibliographies by topics / Tom Animals Animal rights

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters
  5. Reports

Academic literature on the topic 'Tom Animals Animal rights'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 1 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Tom Animals Animal rights.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Tom Animals Animal rights"

1

Chakraborty, Sreetama. "Animal Ethics: Beyond Neutrality, Universality, and Consistency." Bangladesh Journal of Bioethics 7, no. 3 (January 2, 2017): 34–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bioethics.v7i3.30951.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper reflects a possibility of going beyond the postmodernists’ way of ethically examining non-human animals based on the tripartite pillars of neutrality, universality, and consistency. My concentration focuses on some interrelated queries, such as – What does animal ethics conventionally mean? How did power, hierarchy, and domination separate humans from other animals? How does the fate of non-human animals (whether they ought to be morally considered or not) depend on humans’ moral values? How far is it justified to secure animal rights in the age of perilous animal use, especially for food or during animal experimentation? While examining these issues, I bring into light the several arguments and positions put forward by thinkers such as Jeremy Bentham, Peter Singer, Tom Regan, Carl Cohen, Brian Berry, and others. Moreover, my search is for a non-anthropocentric sustainable paradigm, to balance human interests and animal needs together, in order to sustain the future generations of human and non-human intimacy.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Paccagnella, Amanda Formisano, and Patricia Borba Marchetto. "Animal welfare versus animal abolitionism: a comparison of the theories by Peter Singer and Tom Regan and their influence on the Brazilian Federal Constitution." Revista de Direitos e Garantias Fundamentais 20, no. 2 (December 20, 2019): 251. http://dx.doi.org/10.18759/rdgf.v20i2.1493.

Full text
Abstract:
With the emergence of environmental concerns and the awakening regarding animal treatment issues, the anthropocentric paradigm has begun to shift, causing many countries to review their position on the legal status of animals. Within the movement for animals, there are two mainly followed philosophical theories: the animal welfare perspective, which has Peter Singer as its leading author, and the animal rights theory, likewise known as the abolitionist movement, with Tom Regan as its central theorist. Utilizing the method of comparative analysis, this article seeks to analyze each author’s thought process and compare theories, contrasting each viewpoint’s moral and philosophical foundations and which principle each author has determined as most fundamental. The main differences between them will also be compared, as well as their conclusions and effects on society, with a particular focus on their influences on the Brazilian Federal Constitution of 1988.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Weisberg, Zipporah. "“The Simple Magic of Life”." Humanimalia 7, no. 1 (October 5, 2015): 79–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.52537/humanimalia.9983.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper explores the important contribution phenomenology can make to animal ethics. The underlying assumption is that animal ethics is as strong as the conception of animal ontology it takes for granted. I contend that Peter Singer’s reductive ontology of animals as suffering beings leads him astray not least because it prevents him from opposing killing animals as a matter of principle. Other leading ethicists such as Martha Nussbaum and Tom Regan offer more nuanced accounts of animal ontology and correspondingly richer theories of justice and rights, but they do not go far enough. Nussbaum even contradicts her own theory of capabilities by also refusing to refuse killing. Marc Bekoff, Jonathan Balcombe, and other ethologists, on the other hand, do a marvellous job of filling in the gaps in our understanding of the complexity of animals’ emotional, social, and moral lives. Not surprisingly, as a result of their insights into animal ontology, they categorically reject killing animals and advocate for the total transformation of their conditions of existence. Maurice Merleau-Ponty's phenomenology of embodiment, I suggest here offers another crucial inroad into a more meaningful and robust animal ethics by illuminating the complex perceptual dimensions of animal subjectivity.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Demetriou, Dan, and Bob Fischer. "Dignitarian Hunting." Social Theory and Practice 44, no. 1 (2018): 49–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract201811928.

Full text
Abstract:
Faced with the choice between supporting industrial plant agriculture and hunting, Tom Regan’s rights view can be plausibly developed in a way that permits a form of hunting we call “dignitarian.” To motivate this claim, we begin by showing how the empirical literature on animal deaths in plant agriculture suggests that a non-trivial amount of hunting would not add to animal harm. We discuss how Tom Regan’s miniride principle appears to morally permit hunting in that case, and we address recent objections by Jason Hanna to environmentally-based culling that may be seen to speak against this conclusion. We then turn to dignity, which is especially salient in scenarios where harm is necessary or justifiable. We situate “dignitarian” hunting within a larger framework of adversarial ethics, and argue that dignitarian hunting gives animals a more dignified death than the alternatives endemic to large-scale plant agriculture, and so is permissible based on the kinds of principles that Regan endorses. Indeed, dignitarian hunting may actually fit better with Regan’s widely endorsed animal rights framework than the practice of many vegans, and should only be rejected if we’re just as willing to condemn supporting conventional plant agriculture.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

WANG, Yungling. "對虐貓事件的儒家生命倫理學思考——兼論動物權利." International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine 5, no. 2 (January 1, 2007): 65–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.24112/ijccpm.51445.

Full text
Abstract:
LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English.二O O 六年春，中國發生了一次女子虐貓引發民眾憤怒的事件。許多批評者措詞激烈，不少媒體也介入了對該事件的報道和評論。在這種報道和評論中，包括記者和專家在內，幾乎毫無例外地對女子虐貓的行為給予了否定，他們認為女子虐貓行為殘忍變態，激進者認為虐貓行為侵犯動物權利，中國應當對動物權利保護立法。但是這些認識和評論或者源於生活經驗，或者源於道德直覺，或者源於糢糊不清的道德認知，卻缺乏其正理性的深入的哲學或者倫理學思考，在儒家生命倫理學看來是荒謬的。對動物權利的主張起源於動物保護運動， 今天的主要代表人物是辛格和湯姆．雷根 (Tom Regan)。但在儒家生命倫理學看來，他們關於動物與人平等和動物享有權利的觀點都是站不住腳的。儒家生命倫理學認為， 萬物之中人為貴， 人的地位無可爭辯地高於動物。儒家思想家幾乎從來沒有把動物放在與人平等的地位上加以考慮， 而是把人放在差等之愛的最高地位。此外，在儒家思想體系中， 動物不但地位低下，而且其心智、認識、行為均不可與人相比。儒家思想家會同意湯姆．雷根關於人是“生活的主體”的觀點，但卻不承認動物也能成為“生活的主體”，理由很簡單，動物沒有父子之親，沒有男女之別，沒有行為規範。儒家經典著作認為，人獸之別，還在於人有禮，而動物則沒有。在儒家看來，道德與倫理只與人類生活有關，而與動物無闕，人與動物的關係不能成為道德之一倫。總之，動物權利無法得到儒家生命倫理學的辯護。動物權利論危害甚大。抬高動物的權利地位，其實質就是降低人類的權利地位，傷害人類，或者說反人類。主張為動物權利或動物福利立法，是十分危險的事情。In the spring of 2006, a Chinese woman maltreated a cat and caused indignation in Chinese society. Many individuals launched critiques on the woman with severe tongue, and public media took part in the report and critique of the incident. Some individuals argue that the woman infringed animal rights and the Chinese government should formulate a law to protect animal rights. This essay draws on Confucian moral and intellectual resources to contend that animals do not have rights and the Chinese government should not issue any law on animal rights.The proposition of animal rights came from the modern Western "animal-protecting movement". The primary representative scholars who attempt to argue for animal rights are Peter Singer and Tom Regan: they hold that human beings and animals are equal and animals should have rights. This view, however, cannot fit into Confucian bioethics. On the Confucian view, human beings are the noblest beings in the world. The status of human being is without question higher than the status of animals. Confucian scholars would never give a position to animals that would be same as human beings. Although Confucian scholars can agree with Tom Regan on the view that human beings are "the subjects of life," they cannot accept the view that animals could be "the subjects of life." The Confucian arguments are very clear: Animals do not have the virtue of qin (intimacy) between the father and the son; they do not have the virtue of bie (difference) between the male and the female; and they do not have behavior norms (de). In short, human beings and animals are essentially difference, on Confucianism, because human beings can cultivate the virtues based on the practice of rituals (li, 禮), while animals do not have the practice of rituals at all. Accordingly, from the Confucian perspective, morality or ethics is only related with human life, but is outside of animal life. The relationship between human beings and animals does not belong to the moral relationship. In a word, animal rights cannot be accepted by Confucian bioethics.Upholding animal rights is consequently undesirable. Heightening animal status is equivalent to debasing human status. This is to harm human beings. This paper concludes that legalizing animal rights is very dangerous.DOWNLOAD HISTORY | This article has been downloaded 169 times in Digital Commons before migrating into this platform.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Takooshian, Harold. "Book Review." Society & Animals 1, no. 1 (1993): 101–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853093x00181.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThe aim of the book is to "capture the movement's moral vision and sense of mission, with sensitivity to its concerns but also an awareness of some of its excesses" (book jacket). It is a brave book in its attempt to provide a dispassionate account of what has become (along with abortion) one of the most passionate controversies of our era. The authors are two sociologists currently at New York University, with long and prolific careers writing about the interface of science and social values. Jasper has written widely on nuclearism, technology, and social change, and Nelkin on genetic engineering, biotechnology, AIDS, nuclearism, ecology, and job safety. Regarding animals, apparently their only two prior studies were co-authored presentations at recent sociology meetings (Jasper & Poulsen, 1989; Jasper, Nelkin, & Poulsen, 1990). Seven of the 12 chapters analyze the nature of the movement. Over the centuries, several social forces (urbanization, industrialization, democratization) have caused a shift in humans' view of animals, from instruments to be used for food, clothing, and farm work to companions to be cherished - pets given a name and family status. It has led to what the authors term "sentimental anthropomorphism," people's attribution to animals of human sentiments such as the abilities to feel emotions and communicate, and to form social relationships. Borrowing tactics from other reformist movements, animal advocates have become more effective in several ways - protests, litigation, boycotts, lobbying, and public relations. Since the 1970s, philosophers like Peter Singer and Tom Regan have honed a notion of "animal rights," providing an important ideological base that has further accelerated the movement. The remaining five chapters focus on five specific themes of the crusade: Regarding "animals in the wild," strong protests have been mounted against large-scale seal hunts, dolphin-safe tuna, trapping, and hunting. "From rabbits to petri dishes" describes the dramatic drop in industrial testing of cosmetics, drugs and toiletries since 1980, to the point where the once-routine Draize and LD-50 tests are now viewed by many as obsolete. "Test tubes with legs" documents the dramatic rise in biomedical research after World War II, and the effectiveness of protests challenging this- reportedly more easily at some labs (Cornell, Berkeley, Museum of Natural History) than at others (New York University, Stanford). "Animals as commodities" concludes that the crusade has persuasively made moral issues of factory farming, humane slaughter, and fur production (both wild and ranch). Finally, in "Animals on display," earlier protests against pit bull and cock fighting have now expanded to rodeos, circuses, Hollywood films, zoos, and animal shows, with only partial impact. Jasper and Nelkin present an overview of the evolution of the animal rights movement by dividing the movement into three parts: (1) Since the 1860s, the original SPCA "welfarists" were part of a larger humanitarian tradition of helping others; (2) Since the 1970s, more assertive "pragmatists" like Henry Spira have demanded "animal rights," using stronger methods in order to force negotiation with those who violate these rights; (3) Since the 1980s, "fundamentalists" like People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) have sought to protect animal rights without "hobnobbing in the halls with our enemy" (p. 154) or compromising. Even in the 1990s, welfarist groups like the HSUS and SPCA remain the largest in both membership and funding. Yet there has been a meteoric rise of the crusader factions, eclipsing the welfarists - pragmatists like Spira's Animal Rights International, Joyce Tischler's Animal Legal Defense Fund, Cleveland Amory's Fund for Animals, as well as fundamentalists like PETA, Trans-Species Unlimited, and the Animal Liberation Front. Moreover, the achievements of the crusader groups are telling. For instance PETA grew from its two founders in 1980 to 300,000 in 1990 (p. 31), and between 1980-87 much of the cosmetics industry had come to pledge an end to all animal testing and allocated $5,000,000 for research on alternatives (p. 2). Some of this strength comes from alliance with parallel movements against pollution, racism, sexism, nuclearism, agribusiness, even cholesterol.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Lengauer, Erwin. "Tom Regan’s Philosophy of Animal Rights: Subjects-of-a-Life in the Context of Discussions of Intrinsic and Inherent Worth." Problemos 97 (April 21, 2020): 87–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/problemos.97.7.

Full text
Abstract:
Modern animal rights debates began in the 1970s, mainly as part of the budding field of applied ethics in Anglo-American philosophy. In just a short time, these animal rights discourses received international academic respect, especially through analytically trained philosophers. Central for this development was the analysis that rights language can be principally used species neutrally. This paper’s contribution is to examine the central terms of Tom Regan’s still widely discussed theory for their actuality and usefulness. Hence strengthening these arguments for modern animal rights theory as a serious approach in (inter)national ethical and legal disputes. Translated from German by Gary Steiner, Bucknell University
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Probucka, Dorota. "O moralnych obowiązkach ludzi wobec zwierząt. Etyka Gary’ego Francione." Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae 13, no. 2 (June 30, 2015): 93–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.21697/seb.2015.13.2.05.

Full text
Abstract:
The purpose of my article is to present and analyze the ethical views of Gary Francione – the leading, contemporary representative of the Animal Rights Movement. He built his theory by criticizing the views of two other supporters of the idea of animal liberation: Peter Singer and Tom Regan. In his opinion, neither of these philosophers did not escape from the anthropocentric paradigm binding the moral obligations to animals with the primacy of human interest. Singer believed that only humans have the ability to plan their own future, and only they want to live and extend their own existence. While according to Regan, in conflict situations, respect for human interest should be dominant. Francione agrees that only people understand a deeper meaning of their own existence, but it does not follow that only they want to live and do not want to die. The need to preserve and continue life is not the result of mental states, but it is a consequence of sensitivity – the biological trait which aims to safeguard and continuation of life. According to Francione, if every sensitive creature has an interest in preserving his own life and avoiding suffering it they also have a moral right to life and not being treated in a cruel manner.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Leite, Fábio Carvalho. "Liberdade de Crença e o Sacrifício de Animais em Cultos Religiosos." Veredas do Direito: Direito Ambiental e Desenvolvimento Sustentável 10, no. 20 (April 14, 2014): 163. http://dx.doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v10i20.370.

Full text
Abstract:
O presente artigo tem por propósito analisar em que medida a proteção à fauna pode impor-se como um limite à prática de cultos religiosos nos quais ocorrem sacrifícios de animais. A questão é delicada se assumirmos que a liberdade religiosa só tem sentido se compreendida como o direito não apenas de ter uma crença, mas de se determinar em razão dela. Como, por outro lado, nenhum direito ou valor pode ser compreendido em seu sentido absoluto, a premissa acima, embora necessária à caracterização do caso como um problema constitucional, está longe de ser suficiente para a sua solução. Nesse quadro, o trabalho pretende identificar critérios minimamente seguros para uma interpretação constitucional adequada dos valores em questão nos casos de sacrifícios de animais em rituais religiosos. AbstractThis work intends to analyze to what extent animal protection may be a limit to animal sacrifice rituals. It’s a delicate point if we agree that religious freedom should be understood not only as a right to hold religion belief, but also the right to self-determination based on the same religion beliefs. On the other hand, if there are no ‘absolute’ rights, the premise above, even though it is necessary to depict such case as a constitutional problem, it is far from sufficient. In this scenario, I try to identify minimally safe criteria to a constitutional interpretation that is adequate to those values when it comes to animal sacrifice rituals. KeywordsReligious freedom. Animal protection. Cruelty to animals.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Soble, Alan. "Rights, Killing, and Suffering. R. G. FreyAnimals and Why They Matter. Mary MidgleyThe Case for Animal Rights. Tom Regan." Ethics 96, no. 1 (October 1985): 192–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/292733.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Tom Animals Animal rights"

1

Bardwell, James B. Regan Tom. "A critical evaluation of Tom Regan's book The case for animal rights." Theological Research Exchange Network (TREN), 1993. http://www.tren.com.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Saraiva, Rutiele Pereira da Silva. "Por uma Ãtica antiespecista: o lugar dos animais nÃo humanos na filosofia moral de Tom Regan." Universidade Federal do CearÃ, 2014. http://www.teses.ufc.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=12717.

Full text
Abstract:
CoordenaÃÃo de AperfeÃoamento de Pessoal de NÃvel Superior
Este trabalho pretende mostrar que o debate sobre os Direitos Animais possui relevÃncia filosÃfica. Ele destaca o fato de que questÃes concernentes aos animais remetem tambÃm ao homem. Trata-se de um esforÃo para mostrar que restringir aos seres humanos a condiÃÃo de detentores de direitos morais consiste num equÃvoco e, portanto, hà a necessidade de uma Ãtica nÃo antropocÃntrica. O foco principal à a contribuiÃÃo de Tom Regan, o autor afirma que por serem sencientes, os animais sÃo sujeitos de uma vida e possuem o que ele chama de valor inerente, ou seja, suas vidas tÃm um valor e fim em si. Tais afirmaÃÃes sÃo fundamentadas em pesquisas cientÃficas sobre a consciÃncia animal e estudos de etologia. à tambÃm objeto desta investigaÃÃo a abordagem de Peter Singer, que defende o Bem-estarismo animal tendo a senciÃncia como um princÃpio moral. Ressaltamos ainda que, uma vez que a expressÃo âdireitos dos animaisâ comumente se refere à concessÃo de respeito pelos seres humanos aos animais a partir de determinados critÃrios sem que lhes caibam direitos especÃficos, a noÃÃo de âdireitos animaisâ parte do pressuposto de que possuem direitos e que devemos reconhecÃ-los a despeito de nossa vontade; tentaremos corroborar a segunda tese.
This work is intended to show that the debate concerning animal rights is philosophically relevant. It points out the fact that animal issues are related to human beings as well. Therefore, this dissertation is an effort to demonstrate that it is wrong to attribute only to human beings the status of holders of moral rights and that it is necessary to conceive an ethical framework grounded on a non-anthropocentric view. Particular attention is devoted here to the contribution of Tom Reagan who asserts animals are subjects of life and possess what is called inherent value, i.e., animalsâ lives are not means to accomplish ends external to themselves. These affirmations are grounded on scientific studies of animal consciousness and on ethology. Peter Singerâs defense of the well-being of animals based on the fact that they are sentient beings will be also investigated. The expression rights of animals is not used in the context of this demarche because it relates to the respect humans beings should have to non-human animals without the recognition of them as holders of specific moral rights. The expression animal rights is purported to corroborate the notion that such rights are a reality to be accepted regardless the will of human beings.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Beck, Daniel Phillip. "Animals on Lifeboats: a Defense of a Sliding Scale Model of Moral Status." Miami University Honors Theses / OhioLINK, 2009. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=muhonors1240373673.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Ali, Cairo F. "Animal rights and animal research." The Ohio State University, 1987. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1371556393.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

McCarron, Gary. "Animals as moral others obligation in the context of animal emancipation /." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1998. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk2/tape15/PQDD_0011/NQ33541.pdf.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Taylor, Nicola Jane. "Respecifying animals : sociological aspects of human-animal relations." Thesis, Manchester Metropolitan University, 1999. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.302628.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Childers, Lindsey. "Extending Human Compassion by Implementing Legal Rights for Animals." ScholarWorks@UNO, 2013. http://scholarworks.uno.edu/honors_theses/31.

Full text
Abstract:
The purpose of this essay is to critically examine the current legal status of animals in the United States and offer possible alternatives to the current legal rights for animals. This essay examines the failures of the legal system in protecting animals that have abilities very similar to our own. With an examination of these types of animals, this essay will explain why some animals merit the status of legal personhood to protect them from being carelessly used by others. Ultimately, this essay is an attempt to open the field of legal protection for many animals starting with a few through legal personhood.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Rodd, R. A. "Biology, ethics and animals." Thesis, Open University, 1987. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.377940.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Gilbert, James Burkhart. "Animals and morality." Thesis, McGill University, 1992. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=56924.

Full text
Abstract:
This thesis examines questions concerning the place of animals within our moral thought. In particular it is an investigation of the rationale behind extending our ethical systems to encompass the inclusion of animals. The thesis begins with a presentation of a general framework defining rights and their relationship to obligations. It then includes an assessment of whether or not animals, according to the general framework, can properly be called rights bearers. In order to do this, the questions of whether or not animals have value independent of their value to human beings and whether or not animals have interests are examined.
Though the thesis concerns itself with animals it is not merely an examination of animal rights. In order to investigate fully the place of animals within our moral thought, many concepts which are central to ethics such as "rights", "equality", "value", and "affinity" are examined. The thesis concludes with the implications its findings have on human actions.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Corapi, Wayne Victor. "Every living thing a theological justification for the promotion of animal welfare /." Online full text .pdf document, available to Fuller patrons only, 2000. http://www.tren.com.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Tom Animals Animal rights"

1

The animals' lawsuit against humanity: A modern adaptation of an ancient animal rights tale. Louisville, Ky: Fons Vitae, 2005.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Flury, Andreas. Der moralische Status der Tiere: Henry Salt, Peter Singer und Tom Regan. Freiburg [im Breisgau]: K. Alber, 1999.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Avhadeev, V., L. Bitkova, C. Bogolyubov, I. Bondarchuk, A. Vinokurov, E. Galinovskaya, D. Gorohov, et al. Implementation of the Law on Responsible Treatment of Animals: from the quality of norms to effective law enforcement. ru: INFRA-M Academic Publishing LLC., 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/1410760.

Full text
Abstract:
The collection contains articles on the quality of the conceptual apparatus and terminology of Federal Law No. 498-FZ of December 27, 2018 "On Responsible Treatment of Animals and on Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation", the subject of its legal regulation, the effectiveness of the mechanism for its implementation laid down in the law, state supervision and public control in the field of animal treatment. The problems of organizing the activities of animal shelters without owners, protecting animals from abuse and responsibility for such offenses, directions and ways to improve Federal Law No. 498-FZ and the practice of its application are also highlighted. Attention is paid not only to modern, but also to historical, international and foreign experience of legal regulation of the considered social relations, norms-requirements, restrictions and prohibitions in the field of keeping and using animals, moral and ethical aspects of interaction between people and animals, which emphasizes the complex and interdisciplinary nature of the presented research. The publication is addressed to lawyers-scientists and practitioners, subjects of the law of legislative initiative, employees of state authorities and local self-government bodies directly involved in the application of the norms of Federal Law No. 498-FZ, employees of various organizations engaged in the maintenance, use and protection of animals, animal rights activists, students and postgraduates of law schools, as well as a wide range of readers interested in this issue.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Jacobsson, Kerstin, and Jonas Lindblom. Animal Rights Activism. NL Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.5117/9789089647641.

Full text
Abstract:
We're in an era of ever increasing attention to animal rights, and activism around the issue is growing more widespread and prominent. In this volume, Jonas Lindblom and Kerstin Jacobsson use the animal rights movement in Sweden to offer the first analysis of social movements through the lens of Emile Durkheim's sociology of morality. By positing social movements as essentially a moral phenomenon-and morality itself as a social fact-the book complements more structural, cultural, or strategic action-based approaches, even as it also demonstrates the continuing value of classical sociological approaches to understanding contemporary society.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Animal rights. Hillside, N.J: Enslow Publishers, 1993.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Barbara, James. Animal rights. Austin, Tex: Raintree Steck-Vaughn, 1999.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Animal testing: Lifesaving research vs. animal welfare. Mankato: Compass Point Books, a Capstone imprint, 2015.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Brooks, Yolanda. Do animals have rights? Mankato, Minn: Arcturus Pub., 2009.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Barton, Miles. Animal rights. New York: Gloucester Press, 1987.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Animal rights. New York: Gloucester Press, 1987.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Tom Animals Animal rights"

1

Rowlands, Mark. "Tom Regan: Animal Rights as Natural Rights." In Animal Rights, 58–97. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230245112_4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Rowlands, Mark. "Tom Regan: Animal Rights as Natural Rights." In Animal Rights, 87–119. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26780-4_5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Milburn, Josh. "Robert Nozick on Nonhuman Animals: Rights, Value and the Meaning of Life." In Ethical and Political Approaches to Nonhuman Animal Issues, 97–120. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54549-3_5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Scheutz, Matthias, Jack Harris, and Sunny K. Boyd. "How to Pick the Right One: Investigating Tradeoffs among Female Mate Choice Strategies in Treefrogs." In From Animals to Animats 11, 618–27. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15193-4_58.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Forrester, Mary Gore. "Animal Rights." In Persons, Animals, and Fetuses, 129–36. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1633-3_11.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Rowlands, Mark. "Virtue Ethics and Animals." In Animal Rights, 98–117. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230245112_5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Ryder, Richard D. "Putting Animals Into Politics." In Animal Rights, 166–93. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25176-6_9.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Peggs, Kay. "Animal Experiments and Animal Rights." In Animals and Sociology, 127–44. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230377271_8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

McMullen, Steven. "Property Rights and Animal Rights." In Animals and the Economy, 141–57. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-43474-6_9.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Horsthemke, Kai. "Moral Education and Animals." In Animal Rights Education, 111–29. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98593-0_4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Reports on the topic "Tom Animals Animal rights"

1

Yatsymirska, Mariya. SOCIAL EXPRESSION IN MULTIMEDIA TEXTS. Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, February 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/vjo.2021.49.11072.

Full text
Abstract:
The article investigates functional techniques of extralinguistic expression in multimedia texts; the effectiveness of figurative expressions as a reaction to modern events in Ukraine and their influence on the formation of public opinion is shown. Publications of journalists, broadcasts of media resonators, experts, public figures, politicians, readers are analyzed. The language of the media plays a key role in shaping the worldview of the young political elite in the first place. The essence of each statement is a focused thought that reacts to events in the world or in one’s own country. The most popular platform for mass information and social interaction is, first of all, network journalism, which is characterized by mobility and unlimited time and space. Authors have complete freedom to express their views in direct language, including their own word formation. Phonetic, lexical, phraseological and stylistic means of speech create expression of the text. A figurative word, a good aphorism or proverb, a paraphrased expression, etc. enhance the effectiveness of a multimedia text. This is especially important for headlines that simultaneously inform and influence the views of millions of readers. Given the wide range of issues raised by the Internet as a medium, research in this area is interdisciplinary. The science of information, combining language and social communication, is at the forefront of global interactions. The Internet is an effective source of knowledge and a forum for free thought. Nonlinear texts (hypertexts) – «branching texts or texts that perform actions on request», multimedia texts change the principles of information collection, storage and dissemination, involving billions of readers in the discussion of global issues. Mastering the word is not an easy task if the author of the publication is not well-read, is not deep in the topic, does not know the psychology of the audience for which he writes. Therefore, the study of media broadcasting is an important component of the professional training of future journalists. The functions of the language of the media require the authors to make the right statements and convincing arguments in the text. Journalism education is not only knowledge of imperative and dispositive norms, but also apodictic ones. In practice, this means that there are rules in media creativity that are based on logical necessity. Apodicticity is the first sign of impressive language on the platform of print or electronic media. Social expression is a combination of creative abilities and linguistic competencies that a journalist realizes in his activity. Creative self-expression is realized in a set of many important factors in the media: the choice of topic, convincing arguments, logical presentation of ideas and deep philological education. Linguistic art, in contrast to painting, music, sculpture, accumulates all visual, auditory, tactile and empathic sensations in a universal sign – the word. The choice of the word for the reproduction of sensory and semantic meanings, its competent use in the appropriate context distinguishes the journalist-intellectual from other participants in forums, round tables, analytical or entertainment programs. Expressive speech in the media is a product of the intellect (ability to think) of all those who write on socio-political or economic topics. In the same plane with him – intelligence (awareness, prudence), the first sign of which (according to Ivan Ogienko) is a good knowledge of the language. Intellectual language is an important means of organizing a journalistic text. It, on the one hand, logically conveys the author’s thoughts, and on the other – encourages the reader to reflect and comprehend what is read. The richness of language is accumulated through continuous self-education and interesting communication. Studies of social expression as an important factor influencing the formation of public consciousness should open up new facets of rational and emotional media broadcasting; to trace physical and psychological reactions to communicative mimicry in the media. Speech mimicry as one of the methods of disguise is increasingly becoming a dangerous factor in manipulating the media. Mimicry is an unprincipled adaptation to the surrounding social conditions; one of the most famous examples of an animal characterized by mimicry (change of protective color and shape) is a chameleon. In a figurative sense, chameleons are called adaptive journalists. Observations show that mimicry in politics is to some extent a kind of game that, like every game, is always conditional and artificial.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Tom Animals Animal rights' for particular source types:
Journal articles Dissertations / Theses Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography