To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Tomasello.

Journal articles on the topic 'Tomasello'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Tomasello.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

BUDWIG, NANCY. "How far does a construction grammar approach to argument structure take us in understanding children's language development?" Journal of Child Language 25, no. 2 (June 1998): 443–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s030500099800350x.

Full text
Abstract:
Tomasello's stimulating review of Goldberg's (1995) book, Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure, raises several themes worthy of discussion. Tomasello suggests numerous reasons why functional and cognitive linguistic approaches in general, and Goldberg's approach in particular, are central to current work in child language. In my commentary I will summarize Tomasello's central claims about what he sees as significant about Goldberg's book, and I will raise the question of whether construction grammar – rather than any other cognitive or functional approach – is worth pursuing. While generally sympathetic to Goldberg's approach, I will discuss two issues that I think are worthy of further consideration in future research.Tomasello highlights three very important reasons why he believes Goldberg's approach makes a significant contribution to child language research. First, he states that construction grammar provides a way of understanding language development as a whole, and not just particular aspects of language development, such as core grammar. Second, Tomasello characterizes Goldberg's approach as noteworthy because it provides a way of relating language development to other domains of human cognition. A third advantage, Tomasello claims, is that construction grammar allows for the view of language development as protracted (e.g. not instantaneous), something Tomasello suggests fits well with his own research findings (see Tomasello, 1992).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Reboul, Anne. "Cooperation and competition in apes and humans." Pragmatics and Cognition 18, no. 2 (August 13, 2010): 423–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pc.18.2.08reb.

Full text
Abstract:
In Why We Cooperate (2009), Tomasello addresses the problem of human uniqueness, which has become the focus for a lot of recent research at the frontier between the Humanities and the Life Sciences. Being both a developmental psychologist and a primatologist, Tomasello is especially well suited to tackle the subject, and the present book is the most recent one in a series of books and papers by himself and his colleagues (see below). Tomasello’s basic position is squarely a dual-inheritance account, in which human uniqueness is explained both through genetics and through culture (in other words, both through natural and through cultural evolution). The main idea is that the phylogenetic specificity of humankind rests in its species-specific adaptation for sociability. The account offered by Tomasello contrasts human cooperation and altruism with nonhuman primate competition, and proposes that human altruism leads to shared intentionality (the ability to share attention to a third object and, more generally, to share beliefs and intentions). The evolutionary explanation Tomasello offers is that human ancestors were led through some kind of selection pressure to common foraging leading to collaboration and sharing. After outlining Tomasello’s position as it is described in the book, as well as the comments by Dweck, Spelke, Silk, and Skyrms which follow, I discuss Tomasello’s thesis, noting a few problems with his approach. These criticisms are based on his own work and on a number of his own other books and papers, as well as on other relevant work in the domain.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Gheorghincă, Smărăndița Tapalagă, and Elena Druica. "Alterity, the Trick that Builds Up a Human Society." International Journal of Applied Behavioral Economics 1, no. 1 (January 2012): 1–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/ijabe.2012010101.

Full text
Abstract:
This article relates two highly important views on the social characteristics of Humans: Michael Tomasello’s theory regarding the evolutionary difference between nonhuman and human primates and the Human portrait, as seen by Economics. Never before considered together, these two ideas agree and sustain each other. Tomasello´s common psychological infrastructure of shared intention and attention finds reason into the normativity circumscribing economic behavior, where fairness, morality and justice prevail. Correlatively, integrating alterity into one´s utility calculations, observed by Economics, reminds of Tomasello´s self-other equivalence and prosocial motivation as key features of building a human society. Finally, altruism, encompassed effortlessly into Human Behavior, is the fundament of social exchange and evolution.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Fedorovich, E. Y., and E. E. Sokolova. "Michael Tomasello versus Alexei Leontiev: A Dialogue in Time." Cultural-Historical Psychology 14, no. 1 (2018): 41–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/chp.2018140105.

Full text
Abstract:
The article provides an overview and critical analysis — from the point of view of activity theory of A.N. Leontiev’s scientific school and, more broadly, from the standpoint of cultural and activity psychology — of the latest comparative psychological studies of "joint activity" mechanisms in humans and in apes performed by Michael Tomasello and his colleagues and co-authors. These studies have convincingly proven the fundamental differences between cooperation in animals and collaboration in humans, which confirms many provisions of the psychological activity theory developed in the 1930s. Yet, the comparative analysis of the researches by Tomasello’s group and Leontiev’s scientific school provided in the article reveals that in spite of the seemingly similar results obtained in these studies, their interpretation varies considerably. Unlike M. Tomasello, A.N. Leontiev and his disciples (D.B. Elkonin, A.V. Zaporozhets and others) always claimed that "predisposition" of individuals towards collaboration emerged as a result of their labor activity which required coordinating various actions of individual participants who therefore fulfilled rather social than biological purposes.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Viegas, Jennifer. "Profile of Michael Tomasello." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, no. 34 (August 13, 2018): 8466–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1812244115.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Állan, Sylvio, and Carlos Barbosa Alves de Souza. "Intencionalidade em tomasello, searle, dennett e em abordagens comportamentais da cognição humana." Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa 27, no. 2 (June 2011): 241–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0102-37722011000200015.

Full text
Abstract:
A abordagem de Tomasello da evolução da cognição humana busca integrar processos biológicos, comportamentais e culturais em um mesmo sistema explicativo. No entanto, uma das principais críticas a essa abordagem é a necessidade de uma melhor elaboração do conceito de intencionalidade. O objetivo do presente trabalho foi: (1) analisar o tratamento de Tomasello do conceito de intencionalidade; e (2) estabelecer interlocuções desse tratamento com teorias da intencionalidade na filosofia da mente e com abordagens funcionalistas da cognição humana na psicologia comportamental. Sugerimos que o tratamento do conceito de intencionalidade na abordagem de Tomasello é compatível com essas teorias e abordagens. Além disso, a abordagem de Tomasello pode ampliar a investigação de processos simbólicos mais complexos do que aqueles tradicionalmente investigados pela psicologia comportamental.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Breul, Martin. "Philosophical Theology and Evolutionary Anthropology." Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie 61, no. 3 (September 10, 2019): 354–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/nzsth-2019-0019.

Full text
Abstract:
Summary Being one of most influential anthropologists of contemporary times, Michael Tomasello and his groundbreaking evolutionary approach to a natural history of human beings are still to be received by theological anthropology. This article aims at evaluating the prospects and limitations of Tomasello’s natural history of human ontogeny from a philosophical and theological perspective. The major advantages of Tomasello’s approach are a new conceptual perspective on the mind-brain problem and a possible detranscendentalization of the human mind which leads to an intersubjectively grounded anthropology. At the same time, evolutionary anthropology struggles with the binding force of moral obligations and the human ability to interpret one’s existence and the world in a religious way. This article thus offers a first theological inventory of Tomasello’s account of evolutionary anthropology which praises its prospects and detects its limitations.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Heidi L. Shaw, Matthew H. Scheel, and R. Allen Gardner. "Tomasello Turns Back the Clock." American Journal of Psychology 130, no. 1 (2017): 125. http://dx.doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.130.1.0125.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Jakob, Astrid. "Michael Tomasello: Warum wir kooperieren." Philosophischer Literaturanzeiger 64, no. 2 (June 15, 2011): 166–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.3196/219458451164265.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Parker, Sue Taylor. "Primate Cognition.Michael Tomasello , Josep Call." Quarterly Review of Biology 73, no. 4 (December 1998): 540–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/420514.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

OZEKI, HIROMI, and YASUHIRO SHIRAI. "Semantic bias in the acquisition of relative clauses in Japanese." Journal of Child Language 37, no. 1 (June 15, 2009): 197–215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0305000909009489.

Full text
Abstract:
ABSTRACTThis study analyzes the acquisition of relative clauses in Japanese to determine the semantic and functional characteristics of children's relative clauses in spontaneous speech. Longitudinal data from five Japanese children are analyzed and compared with English data (Diessel & Tomasello, 2000). The results show that the relative clauses produced by Japanese children predominantly have stative/attributive predicates. Additionally, early relative clauses in Japanese are often used to identify a referent that is not present in the context of interaction. These findings contrast with Diessel & Tomasello's (2000) English data, and possible explanations include the input that children are exposed to, which reflects typological characteristics of noun modification in Japanese.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Thies, Christian. "Michael Tomasello und die philosophische Anthropologie." Philosophische Rundschau 64, no. 2 (2017): 107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1628/003181517x15004614386187.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

Satne, Glenda. "A Two-Step Theory of the Evolution of Human Thinking." Journal of Social Ontology 2, no. 1 (March 23, 2016): 105–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jso-2015-0053.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractSocial accounts of objective content, like the one advanced by Tomasello (2014), are traditionally challenged by an ‘essential tension’ (Hutto and Satne 2015). The tension is the following: while sociality is deemed to be at the basis of thinking, in order to explain sociality, some form of thinking seems to be necessarily presupposed. In this contribution I analyse Tomasello’s two-step theory of the evolution of human thinking vis-à-vis this challenge. While his theory is in principle suited to address it, I claim that the specifics of the first step and the notion of perspective that infuse it are problematic in this regard. I end by briefly sketching an alternative.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

GROSS, STEVEN. "Origins of Human Communication - by Michael Tomasello." Mind & Language 25, no. 2 (March 15, 2010): 237–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2009.01388.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Neuber, Matthias. "Michael Tomasello: Eine Naturgeschichte der menschlichen Moral." Philosophischer Literaturanzeiger 74, no. 1 (March 15, 2021): 44–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.3196/219458451974164.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

Tomasello, Michael. "Precís of A Natural History of Human Thinking." Journal of Social Ontology 2, no. 1 (March 23, 2016): 59–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jso-2015-0041.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

Állan, Sylvio, and Carlos Barbosa Alves de Souza. "O modelo de tomasello sobre a evolução cognitivo-linguística humana." Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa 25, no. 2 (June 2009): 161–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0102-37722009000200003.

Full text
Abstract:
O presente trabalho buscou apresentar o modelo de Michael Tomasello sobre a evolução da cognição humana e uma teoria, derivada desse modelo, sobre a aquisição e o desenvolvimento de competências linguístico-simbólicas. Tomasello propõe que a aquisição e o desenvolvimento simbólico dependem de uma cognição cultural exclusivamente humana, mas derivada de adaptações biológicas características da cognição primata. Essas propostas constituem alternativas para as abordagens tradicionais do desenvolvimento cognitivo e linguístico-simbólico humano, uma vez que: (1) destacam aspectos biológicos e culturais como determinantes da cognição humana; (2) consideram as atividades humanas como essencialmente simbólicas; (3) fornecem uma nova concepção de linguagem.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

Koreň, Ladislav. "Joint Intentionality." Journal of Social Ontology 2, no. 1 (March 23, 2016): 75–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jso-2015-0047.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractAccording to the shared intentionality hypothesis proposed by Michael Tomasello, two cognitive upgrades – joint and collective intentionality, respectively – make human thinking unique. Joint intentionality, in particular, is a mindset supposed to account for our early, species-specific capacity to participate in collaborative activities involving two (or a few) agents. In order to elucidate such activities and their proximate cognitive-motivational mechanism, Tomasello draws on philosophical accounts of shared intentionality. I argue that his deference to such cognitively demanding accounts of shared intentional activities is problematic if his theoretical ambition is in part to show that and how early (prelinguistic and precultural) capacities for joint action contribute to the development of higher cognitive capacities.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

Plateau, Samuel. "M. Tomasello. Aux origines de la cognition humaine." L’Orientation scolaire et professionnelle, no. 35/4 (December 15, 2006): 600–602. http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/osp.1232.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

Roothaan, Angela. "Michael Tomasello. A Natural History of Human Thinking." Philosophy, Theology and the Sciences 4, no. 1 (2017): 129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1628/219597717x14884498299367.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Liebsch, Burkhard. "Michael Tomasello: Mensch werden. Eine Theorie der Ontogenese." Philosophischer Literaturanzeiger 73, no. 3 (September 15, 2020): 253–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.3196/219458451973378.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

Trabant, Jürgen. "Michael Tomasello. 2014. Eine Naturgeschichte des menschlichen Denkens." Zeitschrift für Rezensionen zur germanistischen Sprachwissenschaft 7, no. 1-2 (December 1, 2015): 177–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/zrs-2015-0034.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

Braun, Robyn. "Tomasello, Michael, Becoming Human: A Theory of Ontogeny." Canadian Journal of Sociology 45, no. 1 (March 29, 2020): 95–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.29173/cjs29659.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

Umbres, Radu. "A natural history of human thinkingby Tomasello, Michael." Social Anthropology 22, no. 3 (August 2014): 387–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12084_20.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

Kretzschmar, Franziska. "Review of Tomasello (2008): Origins of Human Communication." Language and Dialogue 1, no. 1 (May 27, 2011): 166–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/ld.1.1.11kre.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

Gauvain, Mary. "The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Michael Tomasello." Quarterly Review of Biology 76, no. 4 (December 2001): 529. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/420646.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

Bjorklund, David F. "Michael Tomasello. Becoming Human: A Theory of Ontogeny." Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture 4, no. 1 (December 1, 2020): 137–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.26613/esic.4.1.180.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

HOWE, CHRISTINE J. "The countering of overgeneralization." Journal of Child Language 29, no. 4 (November 2002): 875–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0305000902005329.

Full text
Abstract:
Commenting on Goldberg's (1995) ‘construction grammar’, Tomasello (1998) proposes a model of language acquisition in which children move from highly specific utterance–event pairings to abstract, verb-general structures. Despite their many strengths, models of this kind predict considerably more overgeneralization of the argument structures of verbs than seems to occur. In recognition of this, the paper explains (and supports with data from a previously unpublished study of 44 children aged 2;0 to 4;4) how processes which are side effects of the emergence of the verb form class could counter the overgeneralizing tendencies. It is argued that these processes are consistent not just with the model proposed by Tomasello but also (in large part) with the grammatical theory developed by Goldberg.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

Beck, Maria-Luise, and Lynn Eubank. "Acquisition Theory and Experimental Design." Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13, no. 1 (March 1991): 73–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0272263100009736.

Full text
Abstract:
In their recent contribution on the Garden Path Technique, Tomasello and Herron (1989) suggested that the experimental results they obtained on this means of providing negative feedback lend support to a “cognitive comparison model” of second language (L2) acquisition, and they further hypothesize that it may be useful in eliminating other L2 overgeneralizations. The results Tomasello and Herron (henceforth TH) present are clearly interesting, for they appear to show that negative evidence—here, a special type of error correction—may be crucial in L2 learning. As promising as the TH results may be, however, there is reason to believe that they also should be viewed with caution. In the following, we provide some of the reasons why caution should be taken.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

Olson, David R., and Janet Wilde Astington. "Cultural learning and educational process." Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no. 3 (September 1993): 531–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00031460.

Full text
Abstract:
Tomasello, Kruger & Ratner relate the evolution of social cognition – the understanding of others' minds – to the evolution of culture. Tomasello et al. conceive of the accumulation of culture as the product of cultural learning, a kind of learning dependent upon recognizing others' intentionality. They distinguish three levels of this recognition: of intention (what is x trying to do), of beliefs (what does x think about p), and of beliefs about beliefs (what does x think y thinks about p). They then tie these levels to three discrete forms of cultural learning – imitative, instructed, and collaborative – which children become capable of when they are 9 months, 4 years, and 6 years old respectively, at least in Western culture where relevant data are available.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

Tomasello, Michael. "Response to Commentators." Journal of Social Ontology 2, no. 1 (March 23, 2016): 117–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jso-2015-0042.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThis paper is a reply to the comments by Henrike Moll, Glenda Satne, Ladislav Koreň and Michael Schmitz on Michael Tomasello, A Natural History of Human Thinking (Harvard University Press, 2014).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

MCCLURE, KATHLEEN, JULIAN M. PINE, and ELENA V. M. LIEVEN. "Investigating the abstractness of children's early knowledge of argument structure." Journal of Child Language 33, no. 4 (November 2006): 693–720. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0305000906007525.

Full text
Abstract:
In the current debate about the abstractness of children's early grammatical knowledge, Tomasello & Abbott-Smith (2002) have suggested that children might first develop ‘weak’ or ‘partial’ representations of abstract syntactic structures. This paper attempts to characterize these structures by comparing the development of constructions around verbs in Tomasello's (1992) case study of Travis, with those of 10 children (Stage I–II) in a year-length, longitudinal study. The results show some evidence that children's early knowledge of argument structure is verb-specific, but also some evidence that children can generalize knowledge about argument structure across verbs. One way to explain these findings is to argue that children are learning limited scope formulae around high frequency subjects and objects, which serve as building blocks for more abstract structures such as S+V and V+O. The implication is that children may have some verb-general knowledge of the transitive construction as early as Stage I, but that this knowledge is still far from being fully abstract knowledge.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

Krichevets, A. N. "Tomasello, Wittgenstein, and Vygotsky: The Problem of the Intermental." Journal of Russian & East European Psychology 55, no. 2-3 (May 4, 2018): 176–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10610405.2018.1529526.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

Glazer, Trip. "A Natural History of Human Morality by Michael Tomasello." Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 26, no. 3 (2016): e-10-e-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/ken.2016.0031.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

Larsen, Steen Nepper. "Critical Notice: Michael Tomasello on the “Prosocial” Human Animal." Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology 5, no. 2 (April 2014): 257–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09766634.2014.11885630.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

Heyes, C. M. "Imitation and flattery: a reply to Byrne & Tomasello." Animal Behaviour 50, no. 5 (1995): 1421–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(95)80057-3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

Mitchell, Robert W. "Kinesthetic-visual matching, perspective-taking and reflective self-awareness in cultural learning." Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, no. 3 (September 1993): 530–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00031459.

Full text
Abstract:
Tomasello, Kruger & Ratner deserve congratulations for their well-reasoned ideas on the development of cultural learning. Their arguments are generally convincing, perhaps because their distinctions and developmental relations among types of cultural learning and agency mirror concepts of my own.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

CHEN, JIDONG, and YASUHIRO SHIRAI. "The acquisition of relative clauses in spontaneous child speech in Mandarin Chinese." Journal of Child Language 42, no. 2 (March 20, 2014): 394–422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0305000914000051.

Full text
Abstract:
ABSTRACTThis study investigates the developmental trajectory of relative clauses (RCs) in Mandarin-learning children's speech. We analyze the spontaneous production of RCs by four monolingual Mandarin-learning children (0;11 to 3;5) and their input from a longitudinal naturalistic speech corpus (Min, 1994). The results reveal that in terms of the syntactic role of the head noun in the matrix clause, isolated noun phrase RCs dominate, followed by those that modify the subject or object of the matrix clauses and predicate nominal relatives. This pattern differs from those observed in English (Diessel & Tomasello, 2000), German (Brandt, Diessel & Tomasello, 2008), and Japanese (Ozeki & Shirai, 2007). Regarding the syntactic role of the head noun inside the RC (i.e. subject, object, or oblique relatives), the early RCs are dominated by object relatives. This pattern also differs from those observed in English and Japanese. We propose a multifactorial usage-based learning account for the developmental patterns.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

BOEG THOMSEN, DITTE, and MADS POULSEN. "Cue conflicts in context: interplay between morphosyntax and discourse context in Danish preschoolers' semantic role assignment." Journal of Child Language 42, no. 6 (January 19, 2015): 1237–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0305000914000786.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractWhen learning their first language, children develop strategies for assigning semantic roles to sentence structures, depending on morphosyntactic cues such as case and word order. Traditionally, comprehension experiments have presented transitive clauses in isolation, and cross-linguistically children have been found to misinterpret object-first constructions by following a word-order strategy (Chan, Lieven & Tomasello, 2009; Dittmar, Abbot-Smith, Lieven & Tomasello, 2008; Hakuta, 1982; McDonald, 1989; Slobin & Bever, 1982). In an act-out study, we replicated this finding with Danish preschoolers. However, object-first clauses may be context-sensitive structures, which are infelicitous in isolation. In a second act-out study we presented OVS clauses in supportive and unsupportive discourse contexts and in isolation and found that five- to six-year-olds' OVS comprehension was enhanced in discourse-pragmatically felicitous contexts. Our results extend previous findings of preschoolers' sensitivity to discourse-contextual cues in sentence comprehension (Hurewitz, 2001; Song & Fisher, 2005) to the basic task of assigning agent and patient roles.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

Kukkonen, Karin. "Flouting figures: Uncooperative narration in the fiction of Eliza Haywood." Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 22, no. 3 (August 2013): 205–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963947013489238.

Full text
Abstract:
Eliza Haywood’s narrators often display what could be termed ‘uncooperative narration’ in that they defy the smooth course that fictional narration is supposed to take, and claim to be unable to narrate strongly emotional states (in Love in Excess, 2000; first published 1719) or precipitate readers’ reactions to future events (in The History of Miss Betsy Thoughtless, 1998; first published 1751). Haywood’s strategies of uncooperative narration are based on rhetorical figures which flout the cooperative principle underlying human communication according to Grice: the denial of narration, adynaton, flouts the maxim of quantity; the time-based playing with readers’ meaning-making, prolepsis, flouts the maxim of manner. This article will develop an account of uncooperative narration on the basis of Gricean pragmatics (Grice, 1989) and Tomasello’s work on communication and cooperation in human evolution (Tomasello, 2008), which extends the traditional narratological focus on unreliable narration. Uncooperative narration challenges readers to find the communicative purpose behind flouting figures like adynaton and prolepsis, contributes to the characterisation of the narrator and, in Eliza Haywood’s fiction, often holds up a mirror to readers themselves.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

Schmitz, Michael. "A History of Emerging Modes?" Journal of Social Ontology 2, no. 1 (March 23, 2016): 87–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jso-2015-0054.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractIn this paper I first introduce Tomasello’s notion of thought and his account of its emergence and development through differentiation, arguing that it calls into question the theory bias of the philosophical tradition on thought as well as its frequent atomism. I then raise some worries that he may be overextending the concept of thought, arguing that we should recognize an area of intentionality intermediate between action and perception on the one hand and thought on the other. After that I argue that the co-operative nature of humans is reflected in the very structure of their intentionality and thought: in co-operative modes such as the mode of joint attention and action and the we-mode, they experience and represent others as co-subjects of joint relations to situations in the world rather than as mere objects. In conclusion, I briefly comment on what Tomasello refers to as one of two big open questions in the theory of collective intentionality, namely that of the irreducibility of jointness.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

Gauvain, Mary. "What are the consequences of understanding the complex goal-directed actions of others?" Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28, no. 5 (October 2005): 700–701. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x05320127.

Full text
Abstract:
Four issues that build on the ideas offered by Tomasello et al. are discussed: the developmental course of shared intentionality and its relation to other developing abilities and experiences, and the conceptualization of three key features of the process: motivation, plans and the development of planning, and culture.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

Żuromski, Daniel. "Zagadnienie normatywnych podstaw zdolności kognitywnych człowieka w koncepcji Michaela Tomasello." Humanistyka i Przyrodoznawstwo, no. 22 (August 18, 2018): 149–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.31648/hip.385.

Full text
Abstract:
We współczesnych szeroko pojętych interdyscyplinarnych dyskusjach łączących filozofię, psychologię, biologię, kognitywistykę, neuronaukę, a toczonych na temat zdolności poznawczych człowieka, wyróżnia się stanowisko Michaela Tomasello. W odpowiedzi na pytanie dotyczące podstaw zdolności kognitywnych człowieka wyodrębnia on współintencjonalność jako specyficznie ludzką zdolność poznawczą, by następnie wskazać na motywację do angażowania się w działania z podzielaną intencjonalnością, co z kolei prowadzi do pytania: dlaczego w ogóle ludzie współpracują? W tej strategii kwestie dotyczące podstawowych zdolności poznawczych - pewnych form intencjonalności - sprowadzają się do dyskusji nad podstawami moralności i normatywności.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

Geoffrey Galt Harpham. "“It Just Must Be True”: Tomasello on Cognition and Morality." Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture 1, no. 1 (2017): 193. http://dx.doi.org/10.26613/esic.1.1.26.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

Harpham, Geoffrey Galt. "“It Just Must Be True”: Tomasello on Cognition and Morality." Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture 1, no. 1 (July 31, 2017): 192–202. http://dx.doi.org/10.26613/esic/1.1.26.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

Jeffery, Peter. "Music and Ritual at Papal Avignon, 1309-1403. Andrew Tomasello." Speculum 61, no. 1 (January 1986): 215–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2854582.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

Merrill, Michelle Y. "Investigating the Primate Intellect Primate Cognition Michael Tomasello Josep Call." BioScience 48, no. 11 (November 1998): 954–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1313299.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

Allen, Jon G. "A Natural History of Human Thinking, edited by Michael Tomasello." Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes 77, no. 3 (September 2014): 305–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/psyc.2014.77.3.305.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

Suchak, Malini, and Frans B. M. de Waal. "Reply to Schmidt and Tomasello: Chimpanzees as natural team-players." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113, no. 44 (October 19, 2016): E6730. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1614598113.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

Katz, Adam. "A Natural History of Human Thinking by Michael Tomasello [Review]." Double Helix: A Journal of Critical Thinking and Writing 2, no. 1 (2014): 1–3. http://dx.doi.org/10.37514/dbh-j.2014.2.1.11.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography